I am not sure what you mean by 'in one package'. I personally think the
Epson QX10 is one of the nicest CP/M machines ever, but that has a
separate monitor and keyboard so it might not be 'one package'.
What I mean by "one package" is that the machine is a complete
computer -- monitor and keyboard built in. One plug, one diskette, and
you're off... My personal preference is for separates, in computers,
Well, the Epson QX10 meets the second of those criteria. It's 3 units
(processor box, keyboard, monitor), but there's only one mains cable (the
monitor, and obviously the keyboard  take power from the PSU in the
 Although I do have a keyboard from a Ramtek graphics unit which does
have it's own internal mains PSU.
partial to the RML380Z, but mainly becasue that was the first
CP/M machine I used )at school).. And to be honest, CP/M was a let-down
after the LDOS I used at home on my TRS-80 Model 1.
Perhaps... But CP/M was a hobbyist O/S that sort of became the
industry standard. Cool, in a way. The closest thing to THAT today is
Linux, and that's a tad bit complicated (and too good) for hacking it to
be much use.
I've always thought the analogy is between CP/M and MSDOS (and not
because of the obvious technical similarities). Both are pretty minimal
OSes, both became industry standards, and in both cases there were often
better choices available.
And, truth be told, it's clear that a lot of
the people I've seen
post in the last 24 hours obviously know a lot more than I do about
quite a few things. That is as it should be. Normally, I'm the alpha
geek wherever I am, so it's refreshing to think I'll be LEARNING things
for a change. So far, it reminds me of the Aloha Computer Club back in
the 70s... Everybody is knowledgeable, and some VERY much so, but all
experienced in somewhat different areas. Seems like a friendly group,
too. I'm a painfully honest person (I know, I know, liars say that,
too) so I'll let people know when I don't know something. But, I have
I think you are going to fit in here. I certainly consider that the day I
stop learning is the day I die. And I think everyone here is basically
very honset (certainly all the classic computer collectors I've met face
to face are).
picked up quite a bit of knowledge since 1971, when I
started out with
computers by dialing in to an HP 2000B timeshare BASIC machine. It's
odd, spotty knowledge, but, one never knows WHAT issue is coming up
assembly language. Am currently looking for a repair manual for
the Monroe, as it has crapped out. I have *** ALL *** the software for
Produce your own repair manual. I've done it (but not for that machine).
It's not that hard to trace out schematics of a classic computer ,
it's then not too hard to interpret what they mean and what should be
Can I claim laziness as an excuse? I know what you mean, a friend
of mine used to make repair manuals for obsolete,
equipment. I do recall how he used to smoke a cigarette, drink his
coffee, and stare at circuit boards for hours on end, and how,
occasionally, he would set down the coffee, stub out the cigarette, walk
calmly outside, close the door, and primal scream into the night. He
would then come back in, sigh, light another cigarette, take a sip of
coffee, and go back to staring. I have reached a point in my life where
I value my time and blood pressure more than the $50 bucks or so for an
Oh, I buy manuals when they are available, but sometimes they aren't. For
example, one of my intersts is HP desktop computers. AFAIK most of them
never had real service manuals, only what I call 'boardswapper guides'.
The same applies ot the PERQ AGW3300. Or the Torch XXX.
In all cases I have (or at least I've seen) the official service manual,
but it doesn't contain schematics. So I've had to sit down for a few
days/weeks/montsh and trace out schematics. And there's a lot more to
producing a schematic than just noting down what connects where. A good
shcematic is drawn in such a way that it's obvious what a circuit does
(an obvious example of this would be a pair of cross-coupled NAND gats as
an SR flip-flop. You don't want to draw it with one on one page and the
other on a different page, even if you give the signals sensible names.
Come back to that <n> months later and you won't spot it's a flip-flop!).
In any case, you might not need a schematic. What
does 'crapped out'
mean? Have you checked the power supply outputs (at least the 5V line
should be easy to find)? Is there a clock signal at the CPU? Are the
buses doning anything? What about address lines on the DRAMs,
Symptom is no video. I don't have access to a 'scope any more,
So the fualt could be just about anywhere. PSU, video circuit, CPU (not
intialising the video controller), monitor circuit, CRT, etc.
I know nothing about this machine, but you could at least (given a
multimeter) check the 5V line. And maybe see if there are any voltages on
the CRT electrodes (which would indicate the horizontal output stage is
runniog). Given a logic probe or 'scope you could do a lot more.
This is one
reason I stick to the older machines. I understand them. I
know what every last chip a PERQ CPU does. I can see the connections, hang
my 'scope and logic analyser on them and sort it out.
I hear you, brother. I know my IMSAI that way... but no other. I
didn't put the Monroe together, and that's a handicap to understanding.
Well, I didn't design or build the PERQ either. Or any of the other
classics I've had to repair over the years...
While I like to have schematics, I have fixed many machines without them.
The most recent was an HP9816 that I picked up on E-bay. For those who
don't know this machine, it's a 9" monitor with a 68000-based computer
Physcially the layout is :
Large PCB at the bottom containing the CPU, 256K RAM, boot ROM, HPIB
interface, RS232 interface, keyboard interface, etc
This plugs into a small backplane which carries 2 DIO slots (standard
HP9000/200 series expansion slots)
Also plugging into the backplane is a PCB above the expansion slots which
carries the monitor analogue circuity, +/-12V regulators and the mains
connector/switch/fuse (!). Also on this PCB are 2 more connectors for :
Test (alpha) video PCB. A 6845 + RAM + a fair bit of TTL
Graphics PCB (DRAM + TTL)
There's a SMPSU mounted inside the case which connects by cables to the
Anyway, when I got it, it didn't work (this was declared in the E-bay
listing, I am not moaning). It gave an error message 'Alpha video
failure, RAM error, address = <nnn> W=<nnnnnn> R=<nnnnnn>'
Well, I had no documetnation at all, but the 9836 boardswapper guide
(over on http://www.hpmuseum.net/
) told me that address was in the text
video RAM area. So it was likely all the errors refered to one problem.
Assuming 'W' mandt the value that had been written and 'R' was the value
read back, it appeared that bit 11 (IIRC) of the RAM had failed.
So I took the machine apart. It was obvious there were 2 2K RAM chips
(6116-like) on the text PCB. I traced data bit 11 from the DIO slot
(which I had a pinout of) across the monitor PCB to the text video PCB
connecotr. Then on that board, I traced it through a buffer chip to a
data pin on one of the RAMs. Decoldered that RAM and put in a new one
from the junk box.
And yes, the machine worked. I'd only had it for 12 hours...
I'm an NIST certified calibration technician, so
I'm not intimidated by
FWIW I have no qualifications at all in electronics or computing.
Oh, no, not at all. When I whipped up a computer,
though, when I
got done I had something better than most people owned. I can't do that
now, unless you call buying a motherboard off the shelf, dropping a CPU
into it, and plugging in the various cards "building a computer." I
I call that 'assembling a computer' To me 'building' implies starting
from simpler components and using a soldering iron or