> > http://oldcomputermuseum.com/logix_kosmos.html
>
> That was the first one I had - the overlays inside were, IIRC, printed
> tissue paper.
Me too. I still remember how I would forget that they were not
symmetric, so if you put them in backwards the separators between
the output values and the plastic separators between the lights
don't line up.
> > Mine died of corrosion on the contacts, and was (regrettably)
> > trashed, I'm pretty sure.
>
> I remember the contacts weren't great on the best of days. I think my
> step-mother threw mine out when she decided my room was too messy.
> :-(
Yeah. The contacts were my biggest source of frustration. I probably
would have done a lot more with it, if I hadn't had to wiggle wires
and adjust the contacts for every "program" on it.
Believe it or not, I still have mine. I even have it upstairs where
I can find it. Not that I've used it any time recently.
> My only real complaint with it as a teaching tool was that even though
> I did all the projects, there was no abstraction of the underlying
> concepts presented.
I agree. They also didn't do a good job of clarifying that the
device only implemented combinatorial logic. As I recall, I got
it before the idea of a stored program really clicked with me.
Unless I missed it, they didn't have a discussion in the manual
that said, this "computer" does this, but real computers also
have memory that stores not only data, but instructions too.
BLS
Sorry, I just had to share this with someone, and I thought some of you
guys might appreciate it...
I've been working on a Three Rivers PERQ emulator since last year in my
spare time, though I've had basically no time the past eight months or
so. Last I left the code, it managed to boot POS about halfway before
the boot process would hang. Well, I managed to fix (or at least, work
around) the bug causing the hang, which brought me to this:
http://yahozna.dyndns.org/projects/PERQemu/PERQ-3.png
Ok, it doesn't look like _much_, but compare it with the photo here:
http://yahozna.dyndns.org/computers/perq/photos/pos-boot.jpg
(Hint: They're the same thing, only one's really scrambled up :P)
The boot process is still erroring out, but it's about 99% there (at DDS
951). Of course, I obviously still have a ways to go. As evidenced by
the completely garbled text, I have yet to get the PERQ's unique (and
extremely complicated) RasterOp hardware emulated to any significant
degree. And after that I have a ton of hardware details to work out.
But this is a major milestone, and I'm so excited that I just had to
share my excitement with someone... I never thought I'd get anywhere
near this far with the emulation, given how complicated the PERQ is.
And if I've seen so far, it's because I've been standing on the
shoulders of giants. Or one giant, at least -- our own Tony Duell who's
been ever-so-patient with my questioning and who probably knows more
about the PERQ hardware than the original designers did...
Thanks for taking a look, and sorry for tooting my own horn...
Josh
Hi,
Does anyone have any experience with using a TOP2049 as a TTL 74xxx chip
tester?
How did it work for you? Do you recommend it as a worthwhile piece of test
equipment?
Thanks!
Andrew Lynch
Greetings all;
I'm reading up on the Onyx (rackmount, original Onyx) and the manual says
that units with three power supplies (OLS') are configured for three
phase, and units with two OLS' are configured for two phase.
While my machine does have the optional lower VME card cage and also the
second SCSI box (thus necessitating the 3 OLS'), I won't be likely to use
either of them. 220v I can do (handy-dandy nearby 40A circuit for a stove)
- 3 phase would require wiring changes in the building.
Is anyone aware if there was an established procedure to go from 3 phase
back to 3 phase on these units? Could I be lucky enough to have someone
here who has done it?
Thanks!
JP Hindin
Sridhar Ayengar wrote:
> David Griffith wrote:
>>> I think it goes like this, someone please correct me if I'm wrong:
>>>
>>> 1984 IRIS (terminal/workstation)
>>> 1988? Personal Iris
>>> 1990 Indigo
>>> 1992 Indigo^2
>>> 1993 Indy
>>> 1996 O2
>>> 1999 Octane
>>> 2000 Octane2
>>> 2002 Fuel
>>> 2003 Tezro
>>
>> I seem to recall the O2 coming out in 1999, roughly at the same time as
>> the Octane.
>
> Didn't the O2, O20 (Octane), O200 and O2000 come out at roughly the same
> time?
More or less. Besides that, the Indigo2 and Indy represent a split in the low-end line, both being offspring of the Indigo, with O2 being Indy's successor and Octane being Indigo2's successor. The O200 was the offspring of the Challenge S (and M) low-end server offering. The Fuel and Tezro are also pretty much complementary machines.
Also, since Octane sported the Cube logo, I seriously doubt that 1999 introduction date. The logo was changed in 1997/1998 and debuted on the Octane2/O2+ in the IRIS workstation line.
Here's the family tree, then:
/-> Indigo2 -> Octane -> Octane2 -> Tezro
Personal Iris -> Indigo -<
\-> Indy -> O2 -> O2+ -> Fuel
,xtG
tsooJ
Hi gang,
> > > Can I use a PC mouse/keyboard with that?
> >
> > You cannot. You need to use a SGI keyboard and mouse.
>
I have plugged a PC kybd/mouse into a SGI Crimson and an Octane
and they seemed to work OK.
> > > Are the monitor frequencies suitable for a modern PC monitor?
> >
> > They aren't. It's sync-on-green, so you either need a good monitor and
> > you definitively need an adaptor.
>
Needed a special cable
so I used a Sun cable on the SGI monitor.
Worked OK.
Have not tried any other monitors.
Regards
Ray vk2ilv
Does anyone have docs for this beastie? it's an apple-II on a card that
goes into an XT... or does anyone have any interest in it? it's been
sitting on my shelf for ~ 12 years now...
At 01:42 PM 10/19/2007, you wrote:
>Grant Stockly wrote:
>>What do you guys think? The thing has a peripheral expansion header.
>>We could hook a modern floppy chip to that, connectors for
>>different drives, and off we go...
>
>What's the cost like? Is the board made up of separate components
>(CPU, ROM, RAM, USB chip, buffers for I/O, Ethernet chip etc.)?
>
>I'd find Ethernet more useful than USB, and in an ideal world I'd
>prefer a board where the functional areas are segregated (rather
>than some complex and expensive single chip, where if disaster
>strikes the thing basically needs throwing out and replacing as a
>complete unit)
The base eZ80SBC from howard is $250. Add $100 for the disk board...
-----REPLY-----
Hi,
By the time you add in all the costs of the CPU board with IO, case, power
supply, cables, documentation, plus the specialized disk controller, AND
write most if not all of the software this project is quickly going to
become uneconomical for all but the most patient and financially well off.
You could use a throw away old 486 or Pentium II computer with ISA and/or
PCI slots to provide any interface you'd like (ethernet, SCSI, ST506, USB,
whatever) for a whole lot less time and effort. A double sided 48tpi floppy
drive will read practically any format given the right controller. The same
can be done for whatever sort of drive you'd like to test.
I have made and am using a few bench stations for testing floppy drives,
ST506/ST412 hard drives, SCSI, etc for a small fraction of what the cost you
are proposing. I am sure many others here are doing the same thing as well.
In addition, reusing old PCs effectively removes them from the waste stream
which is not only economical it is environmentally friendly as well. Get a
small enough PC and they are portable assuming you choose standard interface
for peripherals like VGA, PS/2 keyboards & mice, etc.
On top of the above, as an added bonus much of the software is already
written. You can use ImageDisk for soft sector floppy disks, SpinRite II
for ST506/ST412 hard disks, etc.
Respectfully, it seems like the proposals being discussed are reinventing
the wheel by developing and/or repurposing a new CPU and IO board rather
than reusing proven and cost effective solutions which already exist.
It is just my $0.02. Best of luck with your project. Thanks!
Andrew Lynch
Hey folks...I don't know if there are any Atari hackers around
here; I may be alone...but I wanted to let any interested parties
know that I've located a source for the proprietary connectors that
Atari used for their "SIO" bus, which is used to connect nearly all
of their peripherals in a daisy-chain configuration.
http://www.connectworld.net/cgi-bin/iec/fullpic?AZndUfrS;AT13F;6
I've purchased a connector from the page referenced above, and it
is indeed the right thing.
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire
Port Charlotte, FL
Farewell Ophelia, 9/22/1991 - 7/25/2007