Does any one know if there's a copy of the PDP-11/70 Processor
Handbook somewhere out there on the intertubes? Manx says no,
similarly looking on BitSavers finds nothing.
Cheers,
Christian
--
Christian M. Gauger-Cosgrove
STCKON08DS0
Contact information available upon request.
Does anyone have an extra copy of the Mostek Z80 Microcomputer System
Micro-Reference Manual (a small 30ish page reference booklet, Mostek
publication number MK78516) that they'd be willing to part with? I'd like
to have an original, but a good scan would be the next best thing. There
doesn't appear to be a decent scan of it online. There's a common scan of
it that missing pages, poor registration, etc.
Also looking for the Zilog Z80 DMA Technical Manual (not the data sheet).
The more recent (late 80s through present) Zilog documentation is
absolutely riddled with errors. It looks like it went through several
generations of conversions between typesetting systems, getting worse at
each step.
I'm willing to pay modest prices and postage for those, and for other 70s
and early 80s Z80 family documentation from either Mostek or Zilog, in
order to produce good quality scans.
I still haven't figured out how to get interrupts from the uPD765 FDC in
the Quay. I think they're probably routed via a Z80-PIO input, but no luck
so far.
While the DMA support in the uPD765 is by design optional, they clearly
*really* intended that interrupts be used. The Quay boot ROM just uses a
very long fixed delay after the recal before doing a read. That's
obviously not great if you want good performance.
I tried several unsuccessful approaches to waiting for a recal or seek to
complete before finally noticing that the FDC will reject the "sense
interrupt status" command as illegal if there isn't a pending interrupt.
Now my code issues that command repeatedly until it does not report an
illegal command.
Has anyone found an easier way to use the uPD765 without interrupts?
I'd noticed that one, it looked promising. No mention of support for
the E signals, but it seems likely that they'd available somehow.
Given
your signature, it's interesting that the main target is my Bally
'Doctor Who' pinball machine!
On 3/07/2014 7:28 a.m., The Doctor wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA512
>
> On 07/01/2014
09:34 PM, Mike van Bokhoven wrote:
>
>> Now there's a suggestion that
has my attention. I have thought
>> about this before, but I have no
FPGA experience at all, and
>> wouldn't know how to start. If it's just
a matter of taking a a
>> core model,
>
> For what it's worth, there's
one out there right now:
>
>
http://opencores.org/project,6809_6309_compatible_core
>
> I don't know
if it's sufficiently developed to be of use to you (I
> haven't tried to
synthesize it), but it's a place to start.
>
> - --
> The Doctor
[412/724/301/703] [ZS]
>
> PGP: 0x807B17C1 / 7960 1CDC 85C9 0B63 8D9F
DD89 3BD8 FF2B 807B 17C1
> WWW: https://drwho.virtadpt.net/
>
> "Why
couldn't you put the bunny back in the box?"
Anyone happen to have the schematic for the original SuperBrain's power
supply / I/O board? I thought I'd found it on Bitsavers (see here:
http://bitsavers.trailing-edge.com/pdf/intertec/schematic.pdf, pages 11
and 12) but now that I've sat down to do some debugging the two don't
appear to match (the schematic is dated 1981, so it's likely describing
a later revision than the one in my machine...)
Mine's labeled:
Intertec Data Systems
(c) 1979
Power I/O Board
1424002-04
Rev. 04
Currently the +12V rail is only reading a couple of volts under load and
a schematic'd help trace down the fault. (I will get better at
debugging power supplies, I will...)
Thanks,
- Josh
I am still gathering info on the Sun-1 (or -2 in a -1 box) I posted
about recently. I expect I'll be doing so for some time but I have
gathered some interesting clues as well as historical bits that I will
assemble at some point.
For now, I have a board inventory and photographs for the Multibus
voyeurs out there:
http://silent700.blogspot.com/2014/07/sun-1-board-inventory.html
- jht
Trying to help out some folks on the cbm hackers list read the 6500/1
ROM in the 1520 plotter. It turns out, based on the data sheet, there
is a way to put the CPU in a "test" mode and send opcode data to the
CPU, and we are going to try to to use that to read the contents of the ROM.
The test mode is engaged by placing 10V on the RESET pin.
And, you know, before tonight, I thought I was at least average on
transistor theory and application, but I'm stumped, and I'm hoping
someone can help.
To support 3 voltages on RESET (0,5,10), I placed a 2n3904 with the
collector on the RESET pin, and emitter on ground. base is biased via
10K resistor to an IO pin on an AVR uC I am using the drive the CPU.
That works fine.
TO support putting 10V on the RESET, I built a PNP/NPN pair. PNP has E
on 10V, C on RESET, and B is biased via 10K to C on NPN. B on NPN is
biased via 100K to another IO pin, and E is at GND.
The thought was that driving the IO pin high, the NPN will pull the PNP
base to ground, thus turning on the PNP, and placing 10V on RESET.
And, it works, but it "fades". Over 2ms, RESET slow falls from 10V to
~6V. If I turn the transistor off and then back on, the cycle repeats.
So, I obviously am doing it wrong, but I can't seem to determine where
my theory fails me, and I thought someone on here could help (or suggest
another simple way to support 3 voltages on the RESET pin under SW control.
Jim
--
Jim Brain
brain at jbrain.comwww.jbrain.com
At 01:28 PM 7/6/2014, Mattis Lind wrote:
>When repairing a TU60 drive that had faulty DEC8881 I replaced them with
>DM7439. They were $2.76 each when buying 25 pieces. The original faulty
>chips were marked 7439 on the backside.
By way of confirmation, I have a bunch of (I think Signetics) 8881
chips marked 7439 on the bottom as well.
-Rick
Back on June 9th, I wrote that my KA630 emulator was to the point of
passing POST.
I've been working on the DEQNA emulation, and it's now to the point
where it MOP-loads and runs the NetBSD bootloader. Now I need to
juggle things around to get it running on the same cable as my house
netboot server; once that's done I'll see how much of NetBSD it runs!
[DP-Frank] 35> run -deqna 0tap/dev/tap0 -ram 15
XQA0: MAC 02:00:58:51:41:30, connected to tap0
(0 041f0000) 20040000: 11 4e brb 20040050
vax> g
[c
[c
[c
[c
\[4i
KA630-A.V1.3
Performing normal system tests.
7..6..5..4..3..
Tests completed.
>>> b xqa0
2..1..0..
>> NetBSD/vax boot [Jul 3 2014 18:00:10] <<
>> Press any key to abort autoboot 0
> boot netbsd
Trying BOOTP
(Admittedly, the comamnd-line syntax could use improving. :-)
/~\ The ASCII Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTML mouse at rodents-montreal.org
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B
Hello All,
I recently acquired a Northstar Horizon machine that didn't have any memory boards. I also received a Dynabyte 800589-G 64k dynamic RAM board. Unfortunately, there is no documentation on this board (other than a single set of jumper settings for use in a Dynabyte 5505 computer - http://bitsavers.informatik.uni-stuttgart.de/pdf/dynabyte/404512A_5505_Comp… )
So far, I have the Northstar rebuilt (power supply tested, capacitors reconditioned, IC legs cleaned, etc). I added the components to install a boot PROM on the Z80 CPU card, and I can successfully boot up to a monitor ROM. From here, I can examine and deposit memory and ports. From this, I can determine that I appear to have a problem with the Dynabyte card, assuming I've reverse engineered the jumpers.
The jumpers allow me to enable/disable 4 banks of 16k at 0000,4000,8000,C000. I can either have the bands be there on reset, or switch them on/off by setting/resetting bits in a bank select port that can be defined.
I can successfully switch on/off banks from the monitor (visible with the LEDs on the board, as well as seeing 00 or a random value instead of FF in the memory location).
However, when I try to write any value, I always write FF. Refresh appears to be working, because any FF I deposit will stay there for hours.
This is really tough because I don't have a schematic for the memory board. Are there any S100 experts that could point me in a direction to start looking? Port I/O is working (to the serial port as well as to the bank select port). Memory read appears to work, because I get values that are consistent (the RAM will sometimes boot up with random values, and the random value will stay that way in that memory location until I attempt to write anything to it, then it goes FF). It appears to be a write issue.
I've enabled a wait state on the CPU in case it was a timing issue, but no difference.
I'd appreciate any suggestions on where I should put my logic probe :)
Image of the memory board here if interested: http://www.broadbandpig.com/?attachment_id=51
Ian
Who was it that wanted the Sun Type 4 keyboard?
I have one here, complete with cable, but no way to test it.
Looks to be in good condition.
First $25 including shipping slowboat to lower 48 states takes it home..
Cindy Croxton
Electronics Plus
1613 Water Street
Kerrville, TX 78028
830-792-3400 phone
830-792-3404 fax
sales at elecplus.com
AOL IM elcpls
On Jul 6, 2014, at 11:00 AM, John Ames wrote:
>> I figured out the problem with test /util command. The problem with the SHOW
>> KBD still exists.
> I could be wrong, but I thought that command only deals with
> directly-attached DEC keyboards when using the keyboard/mouse/video as
> the terminal? I don't think it does anything with a serial-port
> console. I'll try and remember to check on mine this week.
I tested today, and with the serial console, SHOW KBD does display the error message. When configured to use the graphic console and DEC keyboard, the ROM prompts for the keyboard language (3 for English) and displays that in response to SHOW KBD.
I hate to open this discussion again, but Jack Rubin and I are both
repairing DEC Omnibus boards and need some DEC 8881 driver chips.
Since my PDP-8/e only has a 20 slot backplane and only has a few
boards installed I will try a lower drive SN7401 in place of the DEC
8881.
--
Michael Thompson
Hello All,
I recently acquired a Northstar Horizon machine that didn't have any memory boards. I also received a Dynabyte 800589-G 64k dynamic RAM board. Unfortunately, there is no documentation on this board (other than a single set of jumper settings for use in a Dynabyte 5505 computer - http://bitsavers.informatik.uni-stuttgart.de/pdf/dynabyte/404512A_5505_Comp… )
So far, I have the Northstar rebuilt (power supply tested, capacitors reconditioned, IC legs cleaned, etc). I added the components to install a boot PROM on the Z80 CPU card, and I can successfully boot up to a monitor ROM. From here, I can examine and deposit memory and ports. From this, I can determine that I appear to have a problem with the Dynabyte card, assuming I've reverse engineered the jumpers.
The jumpers allow me to enable/disable 4 banks of 16k at 0000,4000,8000,C000. I can either have the bands be there on reset, or switch them on/off by setting/resetting bits in a bank select port that can be defined.
I can successfully switch on/off banks from the monitor (visible with the LEDs on the board, as well as seeing 00 or a random value instead of FF in the memory location).
However, when I try to write any value, I always write FF. Refresh appears to be working, because any FF I deposit will stay there for hours.
This is really tough because I don't have a schematic for the memory board. Are there any S100 experts that could point me in a direction to start looking? Port I/O is working (to the serial port as well as to the bank select port). Memory read appears to work, because I get values that are consistent (the RAM will sometimes boot up with random values, and the random value will stay that way in that memory location until I attempt to write anything to it, then it goes FF). It appears to be a write issue.
I've enabled a wait state on the CPU in case it was a timing issue, but no difference.
I'd appreciate any suggestions on where I should put my logic probe :)
Image of the memory board here if interested: http://www.broadbandpig.com/?attachment_id=51
Ian
Howdy,
A couple of DS2D 5.25 floppies landed on my desk from an AT&T Unix
PC/3B1. As I understand it, these are essentially UFS beasts. (I have
both 8 and 10 sector ones; neither appear to be bootable).
Are there any utilities out there available to digest these things?
If not, I suppose I can write one.
TIA,
Chuck
> I figured out the problem with test /util command. The problem with the SHOW
> KBD still exists.
I could be wrong, but I thought that command only deals with
directly-attached DEC keyboards when using the keyboard/mouse/video as
the terminal? I don't think it does anything with a serial-port
console. I'll try and remember to check on mine this week.
>
>i have here a VAXstation 4000/60 with a VT100 Terminal attatched the
>serial console.
>In >>> console mode are some commands not availible and i can not figure
>out why.
>
>I want top set kbd to 1 . >>>set kbd answer is ?23 ILL CMD. Also by
>typing set kbd 1.
>The test / util commands do not work also...
>
>I tried to set a password. Type set pse 1. Login. But there is even the
>same isue.
>
>Any Ideas what is happen?
>
Make sure the VT100 is set to 9600 baud, no parity.
I tried with my VAX 4000/100A (KA52-A) and I get similar errors if I connect
to it using a terminal emulator set to odd parity.
Regards,
Peter Coghlan.
The title says it all. I'm looking to repair/configure a OIS 527 24k RAM
board for my Challenger 4P. Anyone have or know of the existence of a
manual for this board?
Thanks
Terry (Tez)
Hi
i have here a VAXstation 4000/60 with a VT100 Terminal attatched the
serial console.
In >>> console mode are some commands not availible and i can not figure
out why.
I want top set kbd to 1 . >>>set kbd answer is ?23 ILL CMD. Also by
typing set kbd 1.
The test / util commands do not work also...
I tried to set a password. Type set pse 1. Login. But there is even the
same isue.
Any Ideas what is happen?
Marco
In most cases, I find the remarked ICs are actually OK. They're
obviously fakes still (commonly the origin printed on the top is
different to the origin in the casting on the bottom), but functionally
they're fine. This puzzled me initially, but I asked one of the sellers
about this, and he said that it was done because the process of removing
the ICs from the boards often marks or damages the printing. So the
standard process involves remarking, straightening the legs to factory
original angles, and re-tinning. It results in used ICs that look new.
Sometimes they're sold as 'remanufactured' (which is sort of accurate),
other times they're sold as new, which is obviously untrue. I'm not that
bothered so long as they work, though I probably should complain about
it.
On 3/07/2014 9:03 a.m., Tony Duell wrote:
> This is becoming real
problem. The remarked devices, of course, have no relation to what they
claim to be, they can't possibly work. Heck, I once enqired about a
replacement for an HP custom IC and was asked 'what package, and how
many pins'. Given this device had only ever existed in one pacakge, with
one particualr pin count, it wa obvious I was goign to get a fake. I do
wonder why they botyher. They can't make that much money selling to
hobyists, surely no commercial company wants such fakes.
>
>> I spent
a while looking
>> over the datasheets of the 68B09 as compared to the
68B09E. It's obvious
>> that there's some difference in the way the
timing works, but I haven't
>> been able to come to any firm conclusions
what the exact difference is,
>> and what purpose it serves. The best I
can do is that it's related to
>> synchronization with some external
devices.
>
> he difference is where hte clock circuitry is.
>
> The
6809 (normal and E_) need a pair of clocks in hase quadrature. The E
>
clock (Enable) and the Q clock (Quadrature). FWIW, the 'clock rate' of
> the 6809 is specified as the frequency of these clocks
>
> The 6809
(on E) has an internal clock generator. It can be driven by a
> crystal
of 4 tiems the CPU clock rate (soe a 68B09 can use an 8 MHz
> crystal).
The E and Q pins o nthe chip are outputs
>
> The 6809E (E=External) has
no internal clock generator. The E and Q pins
> are inputs, to be
driven by an extgernal circuit that produces the
> approrpatie signals
in phase quadrature.
>
> IIRC, i f you use the 6883 SAM (DRAM
controller) you prettty much hace to
> use the 6809E. The SAM generates
E and Q, and expsects to eb able to
> synchroinse the CPU to them.
>
>> So - can anyone explain
>> the difference, in terms that aren't too
hard to understand? And - is
>> there any hope of modifying a machine
that would normally require a
>> 68B09E to be able to use a 68B09?
>
>
That depends on the circuitry around the CPU. However, if it sues the
>
6809E CPU, it's a fair bet it is goign to do oomething odd with E or Q
> (perhaps stretchign one of them when acessing slower memory or
>
something). In which case, tryign to use the plain 6809 is goignt to be
a
> lot of owrk. The 6809E was origianlyl chosen for a reason, after
all (and
> I doubt it was cost, the cost of the external clock curcuit
would
> outweight any difference in price of the 2 chips when new), so
the reason
> is more likey that said clock circuit does soemthing extra
that can't
> easily be done wit hthe plain 6809.
>
> -tony
Yes, I'm certain it'd be possible. All the digital components are
very standard, apart from the later WPC system, which includes an
undocumented ASIC. I think producing a working CPU would be a good first
step though. Then, if I'm keen, I could try integrating all the I/O etc
and see what happens.
On 2/07/2014 5:04 p.m., ben wrote:
> On
7/1/2014 10:39 PM, Mike van Bokhoven wrote:
>
>> I don't think the
requirement is there yet. 68B09Es are still
>> available; they're
getting a bit more expensive, but you can still pick
>> them up for
under $10 without too much trouble. They don't fail that
>> often
either, failures usually seem to be in the RAM, 6821s, sockets
>> etc.
When you say 'use a small FPGA development board', do you mean to
>>
emulate the entire controller board, or just the CPU? Just curious what
>> you had in mind.
>
> I have seen the 6809 color computer emulated
as well as the SWTP 6800
> on a FPGA. The only thing lacking is GOOD
I/O for the devices as
> most FPGA's have just a SD card interface for
I/O.
> Ben.
Hi all,
FYI I am starting to trim down my collection and have listed my running
HP3000 Micro3000XE system on EBay, auction number: 221481360061
Classic 3000 with lots of spares and software included. Email with
questions or for a detailed spreadsheet of items.
Thanks!
--
Lee Courtney
. The man's name is Jonathan Gill, email
<mailto:jmhgill at hotmail.com> jmhgill at hotmail.com.
. I will be out of pocket for the next couple of weeks, please
contact him directly if you are interested in any of his stuff before it
becomes landfill.
Cindy Croxton
Electronics Plus
1613 Water Street
Kerrville, TX 78028
830-792-3400 phone
830-792-3404 fax
sales at elecplus.com
AOL IM elcpls
Hi Cindy,
I'm having a big clearout of my shed here.
There is all kinds of stuff from cp/m, xt, 286, 386sx, 386, 486sx,486,
586amd, k62,P1, pII,P3,P4,Athalon y Sempron.
There are mothers, micros, ram, fdd, hdd, cd power supplies, cabinets -you
name it I probably have it.
So if you have a wish list of any old stuff let me know before it becomes
landfill !
Please email me if you want his email address, he will ship.
Will sell tested and untested.
Also has 360KB and 1.2MB floppies, not yet tested, lots of them.
Cindy Croxton
Electronics Plus
1613 Water Street
Kerrville, TX 78028
830-792-3400 phone
830-792-3404 fax
sales at elecplus.com
AOL IM elcpls
Just to make sure for anyone who is reading, this code will be for a
PDP-11 which supports 16-Bit values.
About 10 years ago, I produced some rather complicated subroutines
for multi-precision Unsigned Integer Multiply and used inverse Multiply
to effectively produce Divide. Since they were mostly for a minimum of
128-Bit and larger arithmetic, I felt that they were reasonable as a first
effort.
More recently, I find that I now need a small and reasonably efficient
routine (both in code size and efficiency - assume the extra multi-integer
instructions MUL and DIV are present) to Encode 32-Bit (perhaps up
to 48-Bit, but certainly no larger than 64-Bit) Unsigned Integers - which
requires effective division by TEN. I already have very simple
alternatives
which can perform Unsigned Division of 32-Bit Unsigned Integers (and
by extension 48-Bit Unsigned Integers); they either require lengthy one
bit at a time manipulation for all 32 bits or a table for subtracting
all of the
9 powers of TEN vs all of the 32 Bit Unsigned Integer. Since I already
MUST have a subroutine to Encode a 16-Bit Unsigned Integer, that is
the acceptable starting point at the present time.
The alternative I am using right now is to (R0,R1 holds the 32-Bit Value):
Cmp #4999.,R0 ;5000.*65536.=327680000.
Bhis 110$ ;Branch if DIV will
not overflow
10$: ; Subtract 100,000,000 up to 42 times
;.....
110$: Div #10000.,R0 ;Get two values to Encode
;.....
As long as the 32-Bit value is less than 327,680,000 (which means that
R0 is less than 5000 - if you divide 327,680,000 by 65536, you get the
high order portion of the 32-Bit value - otherwise the quotient overflows),
the Div #10000.,R0 can be used.
That results in three cases for any Unsigned 32-Bit Integer:
(a) Less than 65,536 which is just the remainder, R1 to Encode
(b) Less than 327,680,000 which uses the DIV to produce both the
quotient, R0, and the remainder, R1 to Encode
(c) Less than 4,294,967,296 (which is one more than the maximum
for an Unsigned 32-Bit Integer) for which I subtract 100,000,000
up to 42 times (rare and quite acceptable), Encode that value, then
finish by taking care of the remainder of up to 99,999,999 using (b)
above. Note that the number of subtractions can be greatly reduced
(to 12 times or less) if the first subtractions are for 1,000,000,000
Is there some (relatively simple and code size efficient) algorithm that
can use the SIGNED PDP-11 DIV instruction for values that are
equal or greater than 327,680,000 so that ONLY 16-Bit values need
to be Encoded? OR, if the 32-Bit value is first shifted, is there some
value that I can use to MUL or DIV with to obtain the first value
under (c), i.e. the upper two digits for the HUNDREDS of MILLIONS
and BILLIONS without having to subtract up to 42 times (or even
12 times)?
For example, if just the upper portion of the 32-Bit value, in R0, is
divided by 1525, the result will usually be the required upper two
digits, but as each multiple of 100,000,000 is closely approached,
the result will (rarely) be one too high. Dividing by 1526 produces
a result which will (rarely) be one too low. Perhaps there is an
algorithm that will always be correct and the multiple subtract is
not needed? Maybe someone has found a correction factor which
uses the remainder of the DIV by 1526 plus the lower portion of the
original 32-Bit value, in R1, to correct the result when that result is
one too low.
Just thought I would ask to see if anyone else already found a much
better algorithm.
Jerome Fine
My crew is supposed to start on my last storage unit, 25 ft, next week or
so and be done before school starts. There are about 30 or more VTs, VRs,
and LAxxs close to the door, I would really like to sell most of them.
Most worked about a year ago, except for the VT340s and VT340+s. There are
several almost complete LA210s, and should be complete LA12s, 50s, 75s,
100s, 120s, LS120s and maybe others.
There are no VT05, 50, 52, 55, 61, 72,or 100s at this time. Everything is
newer except a few WT and / or WD78.
most can be shipped, but cost a bit, especially vrc21s. I have a lot of
LA120 and other parts. I also have new tubes for the VT330s and 330+s , all
three colors, which may fit in other terminals.
Please contact me off list. Shipping from IL, 62853. Pickup is great.
Thanks, Paul
I wasn't expecting such an enthusiastic response, thanks everyone! Right now, I'm focused on getting the RL02s back in proper working order. Both drives have worn spindle ground brushes (the little graphite conical things under the spindle) and I'm looking around for replacements.
Graphite is neat in that it's a conductive, self-lubricating material. There are a few places that will manufacture custom graphite parts that I'm looking into, but it will likely need to be a bulk order to make it economically effective (and it may still be obscene).
An alternative material is brass. That part is affordable in small quantities ($30ish for 1). It's still significantly softer than steel, but friction and galling could be a problem.
> You may want to consider using clang instead of gcc for your compiler.
Thanks for the info. After looking at the software architectures more closely, I really do like how de-coupled and abstracted everything is in LLVM/Clang. When it gets to that point, that's what I'll use.
> Have you seen Reinhards work? Not quite what you are doing but
> maybe it can be of help.
> http://www.pdp11gy.com/indexE.html#file:///E:/homepage/indexE.html
That was one of the first things I saw in Google when I originally researched the disk interface. There's plenty of good information there about the packs and the drive communication. Between that and the bitsavers technical manual, I think I have everything I need. I foresee some irony involving an emulated RL02 connected to an emulated RL02 controller...
> But to be honest, I don't see the logic in using an RL02 on an HP-1000 system in the first place.
It all comes down to price and technical challenge. Original accessories are hard to find, and the ones I have seen are very expensive. By comparison RL02s are everywhere and packs cost almost 10 times less, but that's not the *real* reason.
By day, I am a freshly minted computer scientist, but I find far more enjoyment developing system level stuff. I love vintage computing, and what better way to spend my off-hours than using super-modern technology to add new features to these landmarks of computing? In order to develop an interface between the HP and the RL02, I've had to learn all sorts of things about Verilog, timing closure, proper design constraints, etc. For me, it's the best of both worlds. I get to play with computers that are older than I am (don't judge me ;) ) and learn marketable skills that should help me down the road.
Christopher
A question for someone with specialist knowledge in 6809s. I work on
pinball machines a lot, and the 68B09E is a commonly used CPU.
Unfortunately, it's getting harder to find 68B09Es (though by no means
impossible quite yet). It seems that most of them on eBay are
counterfeits; the last lot I bought were all fake, marked Japan on the
front, but China on the back. They looked very convincing, with the
markings etched very nicely, rather than printed. Unfortunately, they
didn't work. Overall, it looks like getting 68B09Es is becoming harder,
and I'm wondering if there's some alternative.
I spent a while looking
over the datasheets of the 68B09 as compared to the 68B09E. It's obvious
that there's some difference in the way the timing works, but I haven't
been able to come to any firm conclusions what the exact difference is,
and what purpose it serves. The best I can do is that it's related to
synchronization with some external devices.
So - can anyone explain
the difference, in terms that aren't too hard to understand? And - is
there any hope of modifying a machine that would normally require a
68B09E to be able to use a 68B09?
Now there's a suggestion that has my attention. I have thought
about this before, but I have no FPGA experience at all, and wouldn't
know how to start. If it's just a matter of taking a a core model,
setting it up for the target device (assign pins etc.), and writing it,
I'm sure I could cope with that. But I suspect I'm simplifying things
greatly there. It'd also depend on whether a 6809 model would make it
obvious how to get at the LIC and TSC signals. Maybe there's someone on
this list who I can pester with questions?
On 2/07/2014 3:19 p.m.,
David Riley wrote:
> My advice, faced with a dwindling supply of pulls
(you
> used to be able to buy 'em by the bushel from Jameco)
> is to
consider making a drop-in replacement using
> one of the many
VHDL/Verilog models now available and
> a cheap, tiny FPGA like the MAX
II (which Altera likes to
> call a CPLD, even though it really isn't)
mounted on a
> DIP carrier board.
>
> I wonder if there's a market in
that for the arcade community...
>
> - Dave
Does anybody have a source or replacement for LA120 DECwriter III ribbons?
I've actually got about 8 "new old stock" ones, still shrink wrapped, but
all that I've tried are pretty much dried out despite the shrink wrap. They
barely make a mark on the paper, even with the little print impression lever
cranked all the way up.
Thanks,
Bob
I don't think the requirement is there yet. 68B09Es are still
available; they're getting a bit more expensive, but you can still pick
them up for under $10 without too much trouble. They don't fail that
often either, failures usually seem to be in the RAM, 6821s, sockets
etc. When you say 'use a small FPGA development board', do you mean to
emulate the entire controller board, or just the CPU? Just curious what
you had in mind.
On 2/07/2014 3:41 p.m., ben wrote:
> I thought the
arcade market would use a small FPGA development board.
> Note small is
relative here.
Yep, I'm hoping that I might get away with a few adjustments on the
clock side of things. It all depends on those signals that aren't
brought out on the 6809. Will find out, hopefully tonight.
On 2/07/2014
3:04 p.m., Brian L. Stuart wrote:
> Without seeing the full design, I
can't really say. However, I
> encountered the whole issue when doing a
6809 SBC and did
> end up converting what I had originally designed for
6809Es to
> 6809. I did the second rev of the board with jumpers so you
could
> use either one. If none of the rest of the machine uses any of
>
the processor signals that are unique to the E part, then making
> the
changes to use a 6809 aren't too major. How feasable it is
> in practice
really depends on the rest of the design.
>
> BLS
A nice simple explanation - thanks! So 34 and 35 are effectively
output on the 6809, and input on the 6809E. No problem there, but it
looks like LIC and TSC (38 and 39) not being available on the 6809 would
be an issue. I might take a look over a few designs (Williams WPC, Data
East audio processor, Williams audio processor) and see if they make use
of those. I expect they do...
On 2/07/2014 2:56 p.m., Eric Smith
wrote:
> The 68x09 (no E suffix) has an internal crystal oscillator
circuit (pins 38 and 39) and generates the required quadrature clock (E
and Q, pins 34 and 35). The 68x09E requires an external quadrature clock
input (E and Q, pins 34 and 35), and uses pins 38 and 39 for other
functions (LIC and TSC, respectively).
> From: healyzh at aracnet.com
> To: cctalk at classiccmp.org
> Cc:
> Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 11:39:35 -0700
> Subject: 9-Track Tape Questions
> Asking for a friend...
>
> Is it possible to still get new BOT markers? If so, does anyone know a
> source? Can markers from Audio tapes be used?
>
> Also, does anyone have a list of common error codes from 9-Track tape drives?
>
> Zane
I bought a roll of audio ones here:
http://usrecordingmedia.com/netmerefoset.html
They work find on the 7-track TU20 at the RICM.
--
Michael Thompson
Hi Everyone,
I know this is slightly off topic, but I'm wondering if anyone knows of,
or is a member of, any mailing lists that are related to computer games,
preferably older, but with the same quality as this list.
Thanks for your time and happy hacking.
- Josh
This message has been forwarded from Usenet. To reply to the
original author, use the email address from the forwarded message.
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 14:01:00 -0700 (PDT)
Groups: comp.sys.cdc
From: mmccrossen at arletak8.net
Subject: Re: Chippewa Labs Rollcall, June-December 1964
Re: <3cc1ca19_2 at news.iglou.com>
Id: <f5640b38-afa0-42a6-a760-e121353fbd61 at googlegroups.com>
========
My dad, Garner McCrossen was the main FORTRAN programmer from what I've been to
ld (other than Seymour). I had lunch with Les Davis, Edna Bunn, and Verene Cray
last year (2013) and Les is a gold mine of early Cray history.
Please do not use the email address above. pdxmelinda @ comcast.net is best.
> Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 11:41:45 +1200
> From: Terry Stewart <terry at webweavers.co.nz>
>
> Hi Mark,
>
>>You said that the computer was promoted by the "late" Bill Cosby.
>>That must be news to him, as he is very much alive. (
>
> Yea. LOL. I actually meant "late-70's comedy icon" but it can be
> interpreted as "the late 1970s icon...". You can't see the hyphen in
> audio. Someone pointed this out when the video first went up. If you run
> that part of the video now, you'll see I've got an annotation in the top
> right hand pointing out what I meant!
I almost made the same mistake in understanding you, but since I knew
he was still alive, I thought for a second and realized that you were
using the (hidden) hyphen.
>
>>There was absolutely no way to actually get into the innards of the
>>machine as the BASIC had no peek or poke commands.
>
> Indeed. This is what confused me about the sprites. I confused "no user
> generated sprites" (under standard BASIC) with no sprites at all. I
> corrected this mistake via annotation in the video too. However I
> understand Peeks and Pokes were available via the Extended BASIC cartridge.
>
> I didn't now about the heating problem. Interesting.
>
> Terry (Tez)
Bill was pretty popular in the mid-to-late '60s too. I remember
listening to a friend's parent's Bill Cosby LP with the "chocolate
cake for breakfast" routine on it back then. It's still funny today,
like pretty much all of his stuff which didn't require crudity or
profanity to attract audiences. I'm not against crudity/profanity in
general, but some so-called "entertainers" go a bit too far I think,
trying to out-cuss each other.
To get back on topic, I've got two (or one and a half TI-99/4As,
depending on how you count the parts machine). Now I'll have to dig
them out and try to program/play with them using the TV set I saved
for the C-64 I've got. I've got one other (physically) smaller
machine, maybe a Sinclair or similar that requires a TV set as a
display.
Everything else either required a "real" terminal (PDP-8 "Family",
PDP-11 [Q-Bus machines], VAX-4000/200 [I think]) or came with a
"CRT/monitor" of one type or another (B/W, Apple III display, CGA,
VGA, etc.).
<I'll duck now in case I've mistakenly misused any religious
terminology in the sentence above.>
Bob
Asking for a friend...
Is it possible to still get new BOT markers? If so, does anyone know a
source? Can markers from Audio tapes be used?
Also, does anyone have a list of common error codes from 9-Track tape drives?
Zane
My take on the Texas Instrument TI-99/4a. Remembered most as being on the
wrong side of a discounting war with Commodore but a classic computer of
the early '80s nonetheless.
http://youtu.be/p6VjsVwRXYk
Terry (Tez)
Hi guys,
Does anyone know of a (preferably UK/EU) source of HP type plotter pens,
suitable for the 7470A pen plotter?
It seems most of my coloured pens have dried out while the plotter was
in storage, leaving me with a single pack of Roland XD-4SPA 0.2mm black
pens and a couple of of unbranded, considerably thicker black pens.
Failing that, it looks like I might be looking for a Linux-based
alternative to John Miles' "7470.EXE" plotter emulator...
Thanks,
--
Phil.
classiccmp at philpem.me.uk
http://www.philpem.me.uk/
I'm trying to find the top of me desk and found these. I'm sure I pulled
them for someone, but can't remember who.
Any interest? Please contact me off list. Shipping from 61853, IL
Thanks, Paul
Enjoyable Wiki with not only details of lots of editors classic and
modern, but some history and stories which I found really interesting.
http://texteditors.org/
--
Liam Proven * Profile: http://lproven.livejournal.com/profile
Email: lproven at cix.co.uk * GMail/G+/Twitter/Flickr/Facebook: lproven
MSN: lproven at hotmail.com * Skype/AIM/Yahoo/LinkedIn: liamproven
Cell: +44 7939-087884
Is there any way at this late date to acquire a copy of Mark of the
Unicorn's MINCE editor for CP/M? While it originally was supplied with
partial source, it's rumored that full source might have been available
later.
Back in the day I used Wordstar in non-document mode, but in 1984 my
fingers were retrained for Emacs and now I have almost as much trouble with
Wordstar as with vi. (You can't spell "evil" without "vi".)
I'm looking to buy a SPARCstation 5, 10, or 20. I'd also be interested in
one of those Sun PS/2 adapters, if anyone has any. I'm located in St.
George, UT (about 2 hrs Northeast of Las Vegas) so if you're close by, I'd
be doubly interested! Let me know.
--
Thanks,
Kevin