Hi,
some weeks ago I've purchased a System 37 in ebay. This unit was ebay in
the year 2020 and the owner was made this video too:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F1CZKQtaoSo
When I power up the displays shows a 1. Sometimes if I stop and start fast
the display shows a 2, but in all the cases all the leds stills lighted.
The voltages on the power supply are OK, and in general I the unit have a
good look, I don't see corrosion or leakages from capacitors.
Looking the SPU training PDF of Bitsavers/HPMuseum , looks that maybe is
related with a ROM or the WCS.
Somebody have more info about this error, or know if is possible get some
schematics / service manual?
Thanks a lot
Iban
Is there a simh for the otrona attache? I have some.disk images created
with Dunfield's utility..if not I will try to read them by using the Zorba
portable, which is pretty good with varied formats.
Bill
I found a vintage rackable linear PSU at a sale over the weekend, appears
to be late '70s vintage going by date codes on some of the high-power
components inside.
Front panel is plain black with just a power switch and telltale lamp.
Back has a ratings sticker which says "PPI 1247-000-91 ADDS".
Outputs are +24V at 3A, +12V at 2A, +5V at 30A, -12V at 4A.
Ring a bell with anyone? I'm familiar with ADDS in a terminal context, of
course, but this lump is obviously for something larger - perhaps a
"washing machine size" fixed/removable drive unit or similar, but I'm
surprised there's not obvious branding on it if so.
cheers
Jules
Hello,
Does anyone have HP 9000/200 series running HP-UX instead of HP Basic ?
The 5.1 image from hpmuseum.net can be booted only on 300 series with 68010.
Best regards,
Plamen
Hello all,
Long time lurker, extremely rare poster, I was reading the Wikipedia
article on the IBM 1620 and became quite intrigued. I know that there is a
simulator for it on SimH but I have never ran or simulated any card-driven
machines before. I have all the documentation and the ibm1620.zip file
>from bitsavers but I am not sure what to do next. I know I would like to
try Monitor, Fortran-II and possibly GOTRAN but I have so many questions.
I read the SimH documentation which gave me some understanding but I don't
know exactly how the card decks work, how to install Monitor or how to boot
Monitor once it is installed since I know you have to boot off a deck. My
final question is, is there an easy to use card-driven machine to cut my
teeth on? Also, any anecdotes on any of the old IBM computers would be
both welcome and greatly appreciated.
Thanks in advance
Ray
Its been fun? working with Ultrix-11 and have had success with the help
of the list.? Thanks.? The tape file from Bill Gunshannon will create a
working system.? Yay!
I'm at the point of trying to network the SIMH pdp11 Ultrix-11 system.
I have a few observations:
1. The youtube video 'Ultrix-11' shows connecting to sunOS systems. OK,
he did this by simply issuing a single ifconfig command.? That didn't
work for me.
2. Instead, I used the netsetup script supplied with the system, and had
to reboot to get networking up.? I did seem to come up OK.
3. The SIMH FAQ suggests using a 2nd ethernet port, I was able to do
this.? The linux computer I am running SIMH on has 2 ports.
4. The Ultrix-11 telnet ftp are old, unsecure versions, how do you
connect to a modern Linux machine?? The Linux machines refuse the
connections.
5. I also looked at the tuhs archive.? The Fred build script that
generates a tk50 bootable tape image didn't work for me.? I substituted
a file for the tape device and it caused SIMH to Halt.
Doug
I've written a Venix/86 userland emulator. It uses FreeBSD's vm86 to run
binaries natively and intercepts traps for things like system calls. I
finally have it to the point where it can run the compiler via cc (which
forks and execs c0, copt, cpp, as, ld, etc). My plans to try to recreate
the sources for the binaries for Venix/86 from V7 and other extant sources
have taken a step forward. Don't know if I'll ever get there, but at least
I don't need a working Rainbow and can run the compiler at ~4GHz rather
than ~4MHz....
http://bsdimp.blogspot.com/2021/08/a-new-path-vm86-based-venix-emulator.html
has my latest blog entry on it. The code lives in tools/vm86venix in my
https://github.com/bsdimp/venix repo for those that want to take a look. It
uses vm86 mode of 32-bit intel processors and traps all INT xx and other
privileged instructions and provides appropriate emulation... And the
compiled binary is smaller than the venix kernel (but it does less).
Warner
Back in the 2007 time frame, Andrew Lynch had written a utility to read
Vector Graphic hard-sectored diskettes on a Catweasel board. Called "CWVG",
does anyone have a copy of the program?
Mike Loewen mloewen at cpumagic.scol.pa.us
Old Technology http://q7.neurotica.com/Oldtech/
Has anyone tried to compile the sources? succeeded?
I'm not even going to try, but I think the actual low-level formatter code
is missing. Was curious if anyone else noticed that too.
-chuck
My next project once I finish my IBM 1410 FPGA implementation (so, a
couple of years out, probably) would be to write an emulator for the
boat anchor known as the IBM 8100. I had exposure to these things back
in the 1980s. The project was not really a success: the DPPX operating
system was way overkill for the underpowered machine, and wasn't
reliable enough or capable enough to run them at remote locations with
central administration.
The machine had some fairly sophisticated features:
Two groups of 64 sets of registers with 8 32 bit registers each
Auto increment and auto decrement indexed addressing
Address translation - but not paging
A primitive form of I/O channel
I have a set of install floppies for the DPPX operating system and some
of the associated software (but, sadly, not COBOL or Assembler), imaged,
and verified to contain what the labels say (via dd conv=ascii), but am
short on information.
(Of course, if someone else has floppies, all the better. I can image
them - they are 8" DSDD, with the first track single density, kinda like
an RX02).
I do have the Principles of Operation GA23-0031 and
the DASD devices (including floppy) Description GA23-0053
But in order to manage an emulator and actually install DPPX I would
need just a bit more hardware info - or I would be flying blind to some
degree as far as the operator panel I/O interaction.)
Hardware Manuals:
8130 Processor Description GA27-3196 and/or
8140 Processor Description GA27-2880
(There was also an 8150, but I doubt the releases I have would run on it.)
8140 Processor Operators Guide GA27-3197 and GA27-2879 (Expanded front
panel)
8101/8102 Storage / I/O Unit GA27-2882
Communications: Loop, Display, Printer: GA27-2883
(The "Loop" was a LAN like thing - kind of akin to the Apollo Domain
ring, off of which one hung local terminals, such as the IBM 8775).
Distributed Processing Programming Executive (DPPX) Manuals
Installation Primer: G320-6048
Installation Guide: SC27-0401
IPO Planning Guide: GC20-1883
Assembler: SC27-0412
Assembler Messages: SC27-0416
(The machine also supported APL, PL/I, COBOL (which we used), FORTRAN...
But I don't have floppies for those - heck, if the assembler wasn't
standard (I doubt it was), I don't even have that, even though we had it
at our installation, along with COBOL)
DTMS (database, transaction mgmt.)
Messages: SC26-3918
Customization Guide (SC26-3937)
Application Development Guide (SC26-3938)
Administration Guide (SC26-3939)
Operation Guide (SC26-3940)
Reference (SC26-3941)
True story: The early releases of DPPX were just awful buggy. We ended
up dedicating 3 conference rooms (with the dividers open) for a "warm
room" for something like 3 months, housing our personnel and IBM
personnel up from Texas. At one point one of the IBM'ers was overheard
on a public phone in the hallway of our public building telling someone
he was there "to help the hicks from Wisconsin". That got reported to
our management and to IBM's management, and he was on the next flight
back to Texas. ;)
On the flip side, I was testing database recovery (it was my thing, back
in the day - though we did not end up using the database / transaction
manager). I found some bugs in the database log journal recovery
process. I mentioned it to one of the IBM'ers in passing, also pointing
out it wasn't urgent since we were not going to use DTMS anyway, at
least not soon. He pretty much begged me to report it - and anything
else I found wrong. Completely polar opposite attitude of the guy in
the previous paragraph.
JRJ
What's the recommended method for adjusting the track 0 switch and track 0
stop on a Tandon TM100-2, if you don't have an alignment disk? I do have a
scope.
Mike Loewen mloewen at cpumagic.scol.pa.us
Old Technology http://q7.neurotica.com/Oldtech/
I can archive your disk content if you end up needing some assistance.
I have a few Vector Graphic machines with 100tpi Micropolis and Tandon 100-4M drives as well as Mod-I drives at 48tpi. I also have utilities to archive and recreate disks on these drives by exchanging the disk image with a PC via XMODEM (FLOP2PC and PC2FLOP). Note that these disk images can also be mounted and run under SIMH.
Mike
I just printed some board handles for a 32k OMNIBUS board (thanks Vince
Slyngstad, et al.) I now notice that all the OMNIBUS boards have an extra
0.1in spacer between the board and the handle. UNIBUS and QBus boards and
logic flip chips don't have the spacer.
Anyone else notice this and understand why?
The only thing I can see is that it might adjust for the over the top
connectors used on a lot of OMNIBUS boards.
-chuck
Re:
"My next project once I finish my IBM 1410 FPGA implementation (so, a
couple of years out, probably) would be to write an emulator for the
boat anchor known as the IBM 8100. I had exposure to these things back
in the 1980s."
I encountered one, once. Probably 1979, in a small conference room in
building 47U of Hewlett-Packard's Cupertino site. Sitting all alone in the
room. I was looking at it, and an HP engineer came in and explained
that they were waiting for IBM service to fix the memory board ...
the board HP had removed to look at closely :)
Now that I am finally getting my vintage computer accumulation
in order, I need a punched card file cabinet. Does anyone know
of one that might be available for purchase or trade? I am willing
to pick up anywhere in the western US.
In an ideal world, I would love to find one of the ones with a slanted
front on each drawer that holds a single card for a label.
I have an old wooden library catalog file cabinet (60 drawers) that
I would be willing to trade, as well as some DEC Q-bus chassis.
Any leads would be appreciated.
Alan Frisbie
When I worked at Apparat around 1981, we used a lot of *male* IDC edge card
connectors. I've almost never seen any since, and I couldn't remember the
name of the vendor. I just found out that it was Kel-Am, but the internet
knows almost nothing about them.
Here's an example:
https://www.elliottelectronicsupply.com/connectors/card-edge/male-card-edge…
That photo doesn't show the Kel-Am logo, which is just a stylized "KEL-AM".
There are some eBay auctions of the corresponding female connector (which
other vendors did make), some of which show the logo.
I wonder what happened to Kel-Am. Maybe they were acquired, maybe they went
under. It would be nice to find a copy of their catalog.
Speaking of which, it would also be nice to see some Robinson Nugent
connector catalogs from the late 1970s and early 1980s. I am especially
interested in seeing specs for their bottom-entry square-pin receptacles,
which I think _might_ be the ones used on Apple /// memory boards.
A friend and I are trying to get a PDP-11/70 running, and we'd like to get
a DHU11 async mux board. Anyone have an extra?
There's an Ebay listing claimed to be a DHU11, but that one is actually a
Qbus M3104.
Al Kossow <aek at bitsavers.org> wrote:
> On 8/25/21 4:51 PM, Alan Frisbie via cctalk wrote:
> > I recently acquired a Wilson Laboratories SX-530 disk exerciser
> > for SMD interface disk drives.? Unfortunately, it did not come
> > with a manual.? Does anyone out there have a copy they could
> > make available?? Yes, Bitsavers was the first place I checked.?
> it's up now under test equipment
Thank you very much! I've already downloaded it. I really appreciate
all the work you do to keep this information available.
> do you happen to have any service manuals for century data
> winchesters? i have a bunch of manuals for the removable drives
No, I do not. The only Century Data manuals I have are for the T-302,
which I believe you already have.
Alan Frisbie
Bill Gunshannon wrote:
>
> With 3.1 available why would you want to run 2.0? Someone mentioned
> a 4.0. I don't remember there ever being anything after 3.1 (promised,
> but never saw it delivered) Would be fun to look at. But I suspect
> anything beginning with 4 is actually Ultrix-32 which I think went as
> far as 4.5.
That seems likely, because AFAIR Ultrix-11 never got past 3.X.
In any way I would like to point out that Ultrix-11 and Ultrix-32 are
completely different: Ultrix-11 based on V7 (+addons) and Ultrix-32
based on 4.2BSD (+addons).
I actually still have Ultrix-32 3.1 running on a DECstation. It really
is nothing like running Ultrix-11 3.1, which I did many years ago.
Dennis
Hello,
For the sake of illustration to folks who are not necessarily used to
thinking about what computers do at the machine code level, I'm interested
in collecting examples of single instructions for any CPU architecture that
are unusually prolific in one way or another. This request is highly
underconstrained, so I have to rely on peoples' good taste to determine
what counts as "interesting" here. Perhaps a whole lot of different kinds
of work or lots of different resources accessed is what I'm after. I expect
these kinds of "busy" instructions were more common in architectures that
are now less common, so perhaps this list is a good place to ask.
For example, if we're thinking "number of times an item is retrieved from
RAM", then any application of the x86 string instructions that could walk
over memory for a while perhaps aren't so interesting. By contrast, by my
count, the NS32000 series instruction "addw ext(4), ext(7)" requires at
least five separate noncontiguous retrievals just to fetch the arguments
into the ALU. (Note that I'm not differentiating between different sizes of
data here: loading a 16-bit item and loading a 32-bit address both count as
a "retrieval" in this example.)
Instructions that are simply lengthy might be interesting, but not always:
long literals or lots of redundant prefixes on x86 aren't that impressive,
for example.
Number of registers read or modified might be good too, but just saving or
loading for the sake of subroutine calls (e.g. "movem.l r0-r7/a0-a6,-(sp)"
on the 68k) seems pretty pedestrian.
Other criteria may seem worthwhile; I trust peoples' judgement on this.
Although I don't know it well, I suspect VAX will place well in one way or
another. But to give an example of a candidate instruction that's prolific
in a way I find more noteworthy, I'll go back to the NS32k and offer
addw ext(4)+6[r1:w], ext(7)+12[r2:w]
which in order to get its arguments (I think) requires the five retrievals
already mentioned and adds two shifts and four additions to the bill. I
think this statement reads: "Add the r1'th word counting from 6 bytes past
the fourth address in the current module's link table to the r2'th word
counting from 12 bytes past the seventh address in the current module's
link table". That's a mouthful --- it takes a lot of work to describe what
that one line does! Maybe that's what I'm hoping to share with people.
I hope this is interesting to discuss,
--Tom
Hi!
I'm offering an Atari Portfolio HPC-004 along with a 64 KB Memory Card
for the cost of shipping (located in Germany.) It boots / works (using
batteries), but I'm missing its original wall wart.
Is anybody interested?
Thanks,
Jan-Benedict
--
I've been working on a new memory board for the Apple ///, using (somewhat)
modern and still-in-production components, especially CMOS static RAM
rather than DRAM. Last night I soldered the connectors, sockets, and
passives of my first prototype:
https://flickr.com/photos/_brouhaha_/albums/72157719738576267
I need to do some testing for shorts, etc. before I attempt to actually use
it in an Apple ///. I expect that some debugging of the design will be
required.
The Apple /// design is _much_ more complex that the Apple II and IIe. I
intended this board to provide 512KiB of RAM, but I've already determined
that some design changes will be required for that, so this prototype will
only support 256KiB.
The early Apple /// design, as documented in US patents, would have
supported up to 512KiB of RAM, but the actual shipped design reduced that
to 256KiB. There was a third-party 512Kib emory board from "On Three",
which required pulling various chips from the motherboard and running
cables from those to the memory board.
The SOS operating system, as shipped, only supported 256KiB. On Three
modified the SOS bootloader to detect and use 512KiB. Some Apple ///
application software also had trouble with 512KiB, and On Three patched
some of those.
>Hello,
>
>For the sake of illustration to folks who are not necessarily used to
>thinking about what computers do at the machine code level, I'm interested
>in collecting examples of single instructions for any CPU architecture that
>are unusually prolific in one way or another. This request is highly
>underconstrained, so I have to rely on peoples' good taste to determine
>what counts as "interesting" here.
This is perhaps outside even the vague bounds you were thinking of, but it
probably wins the 'unusually prolific' prize by a gigabyte-mile.
Behold, the hidden, secret and heinous X86 2-byte 'launch instruction' 0x0F, 0x3F.
See this talk about the discovery:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jmTwlEh8L7g
DEF CON 26 - Christopher Domas - GOD MODE UNLOCKED Hardware Backdoors in redacted x86 46:03
DEFCON Conference Oct 23, 2018
Complexity is increasing. Trust eroding. In the wake of Spectre and Meltdown, when it seems that things cannot get any darker for processor security, the last light goes out. This talk will demonstrate what everyone has long feared but never proven: there are hardware backdoors in some x86 processors, and they're buried deeper than we ever imagined possible. While this research specifically examines a third-party processor, we use this as a stepping stone to explore the feasibility of more widespread hardware backdoors.
After which you will never trust your Intel-based PC, ever again.
Guy
The Hitachi SH4 has a set of pipelineable vector instructions that
work on 4x4 and 4x1 length vectors (implemented as 2 sets of 16 FP
registers). Nothing compared to MMX/SSE/AVX, but relatively complex.
There are indications in the KDJ11-B processor spec on bitsavers that the
M8190 could be used in a multiprocessor configuration. For example, bit 10
of the Maintenance Register (17 777 750) is labeled "Multiprocessor Slave"
and indicates that the bus arbitrator is disabled. There is also section
6.6, "Cache Multi-Processor Hooks", that describes cache features that
allow multiprocessor operation.
Would it be as simple as connecting to 11/83 qbus together? And adding the
proper software.
Anybody ever heard of such a thing?
Chuck
I think I may need to get a small part 3d printed (some plastic board
mounting guide rails from a PDP 11/24 H7140 PSU). What software is best for
a novice? Preferably free!
Thanks
Rob
Hello Rob,
FreeCAD is nice for modeling 3D shapes.
For 3D printing, depending on the technology of 3D printer, you need to process original model to convert compact sections into hollow honeycomb structure, and add small plastic bars into empty volumes to support the model while it's printed.
I'm not expert of this latter procedure and tools.
Andrea
Aug 23, 2021 19:07:55 cctech-request at classiccmp.org:
> Send cctech mailing list submissions to
> ? cctech at classiccmp.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> ? http://www.classiccmp.org/mailman/listinfo/cctech
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> ? cctech-request at classiccmp.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> ? cctech-owner at classiccmp.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of cctech digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> ?? 1. Tektronix XpressWare 8.1 (Cameron Kaiser)
> ?? 2. Re: Tektronix XpressWare 8.1 (Doc Shipley)
> ?? 3. Re: Ultrix-11 (Peter Allan)
> ?? 4. Need Spectravideo SVI-328 parts.... (geneb)
> ?? 5. 3d modelling software (Rob Jarratt)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Sun, 22 Aug 2021 17:16:49 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Cameron Kaiser <spectre at floodgap.com>
> To: cctalk at classiccmp.org
> Cc: Cameron Kaiser <spectre at floodgap.com>
> Subject: Tektronix XpressWare 8.1
> Message-ID: <202108230016.17N0Gn3c16973864 at floodgap.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
>
> Bitsavers has 6.3 (thank you Al) but I'm trying to push my luck and find
> 8.1 for this XP421CH Xterm. Anyone know of where it can be found?
>
> --
> ------------------------------------ personal: http://www.cameronkaiser.com/ --
> ? Cameron Kaiser * Floodgap Systems * www.floodgap.com * ckaiser at floodgap.com
> -- FOOLS! I WILL DESTROY YOU ALL! ASK ME HOW! -- "Girl Genius" 8/29/07 --------
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Sun, 22 Aug 2021 21:08:21 -0500
> From: Doc Shipley <doc at vaxen.net>
> To: Cameron Kaiser via cctalk <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
> Subject: Re: Tektronix XpressWare 8.1
> Message-ID: <8c287f5c-4ad8-1002-570c-1c671c689494 at vaxen.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
>
> On 8/22/21 19:16, Cameron Kaiser via cctalk wrote:
>> Bitsavers has 6.3 (thank you Al) but I'm trying to push my luck and find
>> 8.1 for this XP421CH Xterm. Anyone know of where it can be found?
>>
>
> Well....
>
> There's this:
>
> http://bio.gsi.de/DOCS/NCD/www.technogoths.demon.co.uk/tekxp400/node3.html
>
> and there's this:
>
> http://www.docsbox.net/V81106.tgz
>
> Please don't kill my server.
>
> ? It's been a long long time since I had the XP400D, and I don't think I
> ever tried connecting from Windows, so you're kind of on your own.? Good
> luck!
>
>
> ? Doc
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2021 10:11:26 +0100
> From: Peter Allan <petermallan at gmail.com>
> To: Warner Losh <imp at bsdimp.com>
> Cc: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts"
> ? <cctalk at classiccmp.org>, Ethan Dicks <ethan.dicks at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: Ultrix-11
> Message-ID:
> ? <CAJCrz55x935vV+O2=eoRyb2ythgQmRVGXx6HGZZFi8rjdv0TEA at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
>
> Thanks Warner and Ethan. That is very helpful.
>
> I had not realised that the partition sizes were REALLY hard wired - as in
> set in the code. That explains why there is no option to set the size at
> installation time.
>
> I will redo the installation with that in mind.
>
> Cheers
>
> Peter
>
> On Fri, 20 Aug 2021 at 22:03, Warner Losh <imp at bsdimp.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 20, 2021, 2:26 PM Peter Allan via cctalk <
>> cctalk at classiccmp.org> wrote:
>>
>>> The idea of using an RA81 drive as it is bigger sounds like a simple
>>> solution, but does it actually give a larger /usr partition? Even though
>>> an
>>> RD54 drive is not huge, most of it is not taken up by the root partition
>>> plus the /usr partition, but is available for use as (on the video at
>>> least) /user1.
>>>
>>> I will give it a try after the weekend and see what happens.
>>>
>>
>> I was going to try tonight. The dksizes.c table suggests that it is 10MB
>> instead of 8.5MB on the RD54. Yet someone else said it was smaller, so I
>> wanted to check....
>>
>> Warner
>>
>>
>> Cheers
>>>
>>> Peter Allan
>>>
>>> On Fri, 20 Aug 2021 at 17:38, Ethan Dicks <ethan.dicks at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 11:50 AM Peter Allan via cctalk
>>>> <cctalk at classiccmp.org> wrote:
>>>>> I just installed Ultrix-11 3.1 using the ultrix31.tap file from
>>>>> https://pdp-11.org.ru/files.pl?lang=en
>>>>> which is the location from the comments in Stephen's Machine Room
>>> video
>>>> on
>>>>> YouTube that I think started this thread.
>>>>>
>>>>> It installed just fine, but just like the video, I ran out of space on
>>>> /usr.
>>>>
>>>> /usr was usually tight back in the day.
>>>>
>>>>> How can I make a larger /usr partition? Is it possible to do this at
>>>>> installation time? There did not seem to be an option for this. Can
>>> it be
>>>>> done by using an additional disk? That would seem likely, but not
>>> what a
>>>>> system manager back in the 70's or 80's would expect to need to do,
>>>>> especially as there is a relatively large amount of space left to
>>> create
>>>>> /user1.
>>>>
>>>> In the 70s and early 80s, it was not at all uncommon to have multiple
>>>> disk drives mounted to add up to enough space, especially to put user
>>>> files on their own device to keep them from competing with free space
>>>> in the system areas.? Also, older, smaller disks were often cheaper
>>>> than the newest/largest disk drives, or systems would be put together
>>>> from repurposed hardware rather than purchasing new.? For a single
>>>> data point, my employer bought a new RA81 in 1984.? For 424MB it was
>>>> $24,000.? Most machines had a _lot_ less disk in those days.? Our main
>>>> UNIX machine was an old 11/750 (2MB RAM) with 2x RK07 (28MB each).? It
>>>> was quite a jump when I put Ultrix 1.1 on an 11/730 w/RB80.? The CPU
>>>> was 30% slower, but it had 5MB of RAM and a 121MB disk, so as a
>>>> machine that spent most of its time with a single user (me), it was
>>>> fine.
>>>>
>>>> When disks were routinely 1-30MB (RK05... RK07 or RP03), it was
>>>> totally common to have 2-3 disks on a machine.
>>>>
>>>> All that said, I looked over this install write-up and it seems to
>>>> assume you have one disk and it slices and dices with default sizes...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> http://ftp.fibranet.cat/UnixArchive/Distributions/DEC/Fred-Ultrix3/setup-3.…
>>>>
>>>> I've installed older versions of UNIX where you had to explicitly set
>>>> up disks and partitions (where you _could_ resize partitions).? Prior
>>>> to restoring the contents from tape.? That didn't appear to be as easy
>>>> with this installer script.
>>>>
>>>>> I noted the options for installing software using soft links to other
>>>>> locations. Was that the preferred method when installing additional
>>>>> software?
>>>>
>>>> That was done, as was mounting an entire second disk for /usr.? One of
>>>> the challenges is making sure you have enough tools accessible on the
>>>> boot device to bring the machine up far enough to mount the additional
>>>> devices.? This is part of why there are system tools in /bin,
>>>> /usr/bin, etc.? You could depend on the contents of /bin being there
>>>> before /usr was mounted.? Also, traditionally, programs in /bin were
>>>> statically linked so that you didn't have to have specific libraries
>>>> available at the time.
>>>>
>>>> The simplest solution, of course, is just get a bigger disk, but where
>>>> that wasn't possible (which was most of the time), people did use soft
>>>> links or multiple spindles to aggregate enough space to get by.
>>>>
>>>> Back in the day, I struggled to get enough disk space to install
>>>> 2.9BSD on an 11/24.? Two RK07s would have been a luxury.? I had an
>>>> RL02 (10MB) and I think maybe an RL01.? I could get the initial
>>>> restore to work but I didn't have enough space to rebuild my kernel.
>>>>
>>>> -ethan
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2021 07:57:44 -0700 (PDT)
> From: geneb <geneb at deltasoft.com>
> To: cctalk at classiccmp.org
> Subject: Need Spectravideo SVI-328 parts....
> Message-ID:
> ? <alpine.LRH.2.21.2108230756300.23222 at sidewinder.deltasoft.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII
>
>
> I've got a very nice SV-328 that's had the sad misfortune of having the
> "K" key rather violently removed. (https://i.imgur.com/IxBIQTj.jpg)
>
> Can someone point me to where I could obtain a replacement key top and
> post?
>
> Thanks!
>
> g.
>
>
> --
> Proud owner of F-15C 80-0007
> http://www.f15sim.com - The only one of its kind.
> http://www.diy-cockpits.org/coll - Go Collimated or Go Home.
> Some people collect things for a hobby.? Geeks collect hobbies.
>
> ScarletDME - The red hot Data Management Environment
> A Multi-Value database for the masses, not the classes.
> http://scarlet.deltasoft.com - Get it _today_!
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2021 17:29:08 +0100
> From: "Rob Jarratt" <robert.jarratt at ntlworld.com>
> To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts"
> ? <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
> Subject: 3d modelling software
> Message-ID: <00b401d7983b$ff929d50$feb7d7f0$(a)ntlworld.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> I think I may need to get a small part 3d printed (some plastic board
> mounting guide rails from a PDP 11/24 H7140 PSU). What software is best for
> a novice? Preferably free!
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> Rob
>
>
>
> End of cctech Digest, Vol 83, Issue 23
> **************************************
The quick-'n-easy solution I found when I needed to model some parts
for a keyboard was https://www.tinkercad.com/ - needs a modern-ish web
browser and a modestly beefy system tho.
I've got a very nice SV-328 that's had the sad misfortune of having the
"K" key rather violently removed. (https://i.imgur.com/IxBIQTj.jpg)
Can someone point me to where I could obtain a replacement key top and
post?
Thanks!
g.
--
Proud owner of F-15C 80-0007
http://www.f15sim.com - The only one of its kind.
http://www.diy-cockpits.org/coll - Go Collimated or Go Home.
Some people collect things for a hobby. Geeks collect hobbies.
ScarletDME - The red hot Data Management Environment
A Multi-Value database for the masses, not the classes.
http://scarlet.deltasoft.com - Get it _today_!
I just installed Ultrix-11 3.1 using the ultrix31.tap file from
https://pdp-11.org.ru/files.pl?lang=en
which is the location from the comments in Stephen's Machine Room video on
YouTube that I think started this thread.
It installed just fine, but just like the video, I ran out of space on /usr.
How can I make a larger /usr partition? Is it possible to do this at
installation time? There did not seem to be an option for this. Can it be
done by using an additional disk? That would seem likely, but not what a
system manager back in the 70's or 80's would expect to need to do,
especially as there is a relatively large amount of space left to create
/user1.
I noted the options for installing software using soft links to other
locations. Was that the preferred method when installing additional
software?
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Cheers
Peter Allan
Bitsavers has 6.3 (thank you Al) but I'm trying to push my luck and find
8.1 for this XP421CH Xterm. Anyone know of where it can be found?
--
------------------------------------ personal: http://www.cameronkaiser.com/ --
Cameron Kaiser * Floodgap Systems * www.floodgap.com * ckaiser at floodgap.com
-- FOOLS! I WILL DESTROY YOU ALL! ASK ME HOW! -- "Girl Genius" 8/29/07 --------
Hi cctalk,
I'm looking to replicate the 24-contact connector system that IBM used on
SLT and MST cards for many years. Has anyone done this before?
The best photos of this connector that I can find online are on this page:
http://techandtrouble.blogspot.com/2014/04/happy-50th-system360-pt5-anatomy…
I haven't searched Bitsavers documentation extensively for IBM
specifications, but I've seen some details around page 54 of this document:
http://www.bitsavers.org/pdf/ibm/logic/SY22-2798-2_LogicBlocks_AutomatedLog…
I'm interested in reproducing both polarities of this connector: plug and
socket. Also, even though the most familiar use of this connector is for
board-to-board interconnect, I'm most interested in wire-to-board
interconnect. IBM used this method for DC power connectors in its 5100,
5110, and 5120 computers. Here are images of this specific connector:
http://stepleton.com/connector/
taken as still images from a YouTube video on the IBM 5120 by Jerry Walker (
https://www.youtube.com/c/JerryWalker-JMPrecision/videos).
I've designed and built a device that monitors DC power supply voltages for
overvoltage and undervoltage excursions and cuts off all power rails if any
voltage goes out of spec. I hope to use it to protect my own IBM 5100 from
major power supply faults like the one CuriousMarc encountered with his
9825T:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b-eN93L6yX8
In order to put my device between my 5100's power supply and the logic card
backplane, I need to recreate a plug and a socket so that I can fashion a
cable that goes out to my device. If anyone has created dependable modern
versions of these connectors, would you mind sharing any pointers?
Thanks for any help,
--Tom
> From: Bill Degnan
> Was there a UNIBUS storage system that used a cassette player as the
> storage device .., rigged to send receive signals via a serial card
> connection.
Yes and no. There is the TA11 Magnetic Tape Cassette System, which used the
TU60 Dual DECasette Transport (I need to create a page for that in the
CHWiki), but it uses a special controller card, the TA11 Magnetic Tape
Cassette controller:
https://gunkies.org/wiki/TA11_Magnetic_Tape_Cassette_controller
There is a small cheap tape system which used a stock serial interface to talk
to the computer, the TU58, but those used DECtpe-II cartridges, not standard
casettes.
Noel
I just saw there is an ME11 Memory Expansion unit on eBay (not mine), stamped 'M11'.
https://www.ebay.com/itm/114941479208
Until seeing this one I had not heard of any other units out there apart from the one I recovered
(ex-BHP steelworks) a few years ago. Mine was connected by a flexprint cable to a rebadged PDP-11/15.
If anyone here ends up with it, I have an OpenSCAD model of the Mazak bracket p/n 1211221 that holds
the regular 5-1/4" DEC fascia panel onto the front of the H-909 cabinet this unit uses.
This is the same cabinet as the slimline PDP-11/05 and to be honest when I found the ME11 that's
what I thought it was, and that the console and CPU boards were missing. I then found the fascia panel
with the original brackets close by, and it fitted exactly.
I've printed a few from PET and they work as well as the originals (including the threaded hole), so
I could do a few more for whoever gets the eBay one should they want them.
I am slowly scanning the ME11 print set too as I've not found any online copy out there so far.
Steve.
Hi all!
The book about John Nash ("Beautiful Mind'")[1] mentioned that he wrote
computer programs:
"Edward G. Nilges, a programmer who worked in Princeton University?s
computer center from 1987 to 1992, recalled that Nash ?acted frightened and
silent? at first. In Nilges?s last year or two in Princeton, however, Nash
was asking him questions about the Internet and about programs he was
working on. Nilges was impressed: ?Nash?s computer programs were
startlingly elegant.?"
Has anybody seen them?
Are they available somewhere for downloading?
Wondering...
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Beautiful_Mind_(book)
At 12:56 AM 7/31/2021, Randy Dawson via cctalk wrote:
>As some here know, I collect some dusty deck fortran graphics. We have MOVIE.BYU up and running! (Thanks Douglas Taylor and Emanuel Steibler).
Once I was in the business of making 3D file format translators,
and I still have code that runs under Windows that can read
and write Movie.BYU format.
- John
Was there a UNIBUS storage system that used a cassette player as the
storage device (like an old Panasonic or RadioShack cassette player),
rigged to send receive signals via a serial card connection. I.e. the
system would have one serial card for the terminal and another serial card
on a different port for the cassette player? It might have to load as if
it was a high-speed papertape but it in theory would work.
Bill
Hi all --
Recently picked up a DH11-AD and now I just need to track down an
appropriate bulkhead panel to go with it. Originally this would have been
the H317-B, I'm not sure if there were others that are directly compatible,
but if anyone has one lying around drop me a line!
Thanks!
- Josh
Charles Dickman <chd at chdickman.com> wrote:
> There are indications in the KDJ11-B processor spec on bitsavers that
> the M8190 could be used in a multiprocessor configuration. For
> example, bit 10 of the Maintenance Register (17 777 750) is labeled
> "Multiprocessor Slave" and indicates that the bus arbitrator is
> disabled. There is also section 6.6, "Cache Multi-Processor Hooks",
> that describes cache features that allow multiprocessor operation.
>
>Would it be as simple as connecting to 11/83 qbus together? And adding
> the proper software.
>
> Anybody ever heard of such a thing?
Such a system was put together and tested at DEC with the RSX group
(who did the PDP-11/74 multiprocessor work). I'm told that while it
worked, it wasn't terrible successful, and the project was abandoned.
I was given a gift of one of the CPU modules that was used in the test
and I might still have it around here. I can't recall for certain,
but I think the module required some ECOs to make it work in a
multi-processor configuration.
The person to ask about this, Brian McCarthy, is unfortunately no
longer with us. :-(
Alan Frisbie
I ran into a YouTube video, that it is 5 years old, titled "Ultrix-11
3.1 on an emulated PDP-11/73" and I found it very interesting.
It shows installation of Ultrix-11 under SIMH.? The fellow steps through
the installation process and appears to be quite knowable.
I wanted to replicate it but couldn't locate the *.tap file used in the
video that was an image of the bootable TK50 distribution.
Bitsavers and tuhs.org have Ultrix-11 files, but not the bootable tape
image.
Anyone know where the tape image is located?
Doug
I have a CDC 9427H drive ( https://i.imgur.com/Wn87MRb.jpg ) that is
absolutely desparate for a new home. It's quite likely over 80lbs, so
shipping would be problematic. I'm in Graham, WA.
It's free, it's lonely, and it's desparate for your gentle touch. Please
won't you think of the disk drives?
g.
--
Proud owner of F-15C 80-0007
http://www.f15sim.com - The only one of its kind.
http://www.diy-cockpits.org/coll - Go Collimated or Go Home.
Some people collect things for a hobby. Geeks collect hobbies.
ScarletDME - The red hot Data Management Environment
A Multi-Value database for the masses, not the classes.
http://scarlet.deltasoft.com - Get it _today_!
Is it still useful to linearize PDFs?
I've been scanning and PDFing manuals for 16 years, and I've been
linearizing them regularly. My understanding is that this made them
accessible on a page-by-page basis in Web browsers without requiring a
complete file download first. But given the increase in typical bandwidth
in 16 years, I wonder if this is still useful. It is an extra step, and it
does make the files somewhat larger.
Recommendations? Does linearizing confer any advantage locally once the
entire file is downloaded?
Thanks.
-- Dave
Hi all,
you're invited to the Update computer club[0] public lecture series
"Updateringar"[1]!
When: 2021-08-14, 19:00 CEST
Where: https://bbb.cryptoparty.se/b/upd-0mo-m2u-aq8
The Whirlwind I
The Whirlwind was a computer of the first generation built at the
servomechanisms lab at MIT. It was the first computer designed to be a
highly reliable part of a system, and to be controlled in real time,
rather than be a programmable calculator for scientific research. Its
interactive nature directly started a tradition of computer engineering
at MIT which includes the TX-0, TX-2 and DEC's PDP line of
minicomputers. Its role in a simulated air defense system led to the
development of the AN/FSQ-7 computer, the center piece of the SAGE
system. In my talk I will give the historical context in which Whirlwind
was designed and built, explain its architecture and block diagrams, go
into how it was built and how it evolved over its lifetime, and of
course show some simple demos in my emulator. Those who want to stick
around for a bit longer are encouraged to join me in a little hands-on
hacking session where we look at some original code, but also write our
own to get a feeling for what programming the Whirlwind is like.
Angelo Papenhoff (Humboldt University of Berlin)
The lecture is free and open to everyone.
Upcoming: 2021-09-11, 19:00: The evolution of TECO and EMACS ? hands-on
demo. Lars Brinkhoff (ICtech)
Hope to see you there,
Anke
[0] http://www.update.uu.se/index_eng.html
[1] https://www.update.uu.se/wiki/doku.php/projekt:updateringar
On Monday, August 16, 2021 at 14:20, Wayne Sudol wrote:
> Out of curiosity, is there a reason you do not use Acrobat for
> creating pdfs?
Primarily because I have not purchased a license for Acrobat. Also, when I
started scanning manuals ten years ago, Al Kossow recommended tumble, which
worked well. And with source available, I've been able to extend it to
give me finer control over some aspects of PDF production.
-- Dave
On Mon, 16 Aug 2021 at 23:21, Wayne Sudol via cctech
<cctech at classiccmp.org> wrote:
>
> Out of curiosity, is there a reason you do not use Acrobat for creating
> pdfs?
I have been making PDFs for at least 20 years now, probably more.
AFAIK I have _never_ used Acrobat to create them. I print from
LibreOffice to its PDF generator, or I use any random Mac OS X app as
under that OS all apps can output PDF -- PDF is the native rendering
format of Mac OS X.
I do not normally use Windows but I believe that most modern Win10
apps can save as PDF.
I mostly use Linux and there is no Acrobat for Linux. The reader app
was discontinued years ago and no longer works on most modern distros.
With considerable effort I have managed to start it inside a Docker
container but it's complex and difficult; normally I just use Xviewer
or Okular.
You ask as if Acrobat were the normal or default way to make PDF
files. I don't think that's been true for decades now.
P.S. Please bottom-post on mailing lists. Thunderbird, for instance,
runs on all major OSes and talks to Hotmail/Outlook.com just fine.
--
Liam Proven ? Profile: https://about.me/liamproven
Email: lproven at cix.co.uk ? gMail/gTalk/gHangouts: lproven at gmail.com
Twitter/Facebook/LinkedIn/Flickr: lproven ? Skype: liamproven
UK: +44 7939-087884 ? ?R (+ WhatsApp/Telegram/Signal): +420 702 829 053
Tickets and News Here:
https://www.kennettclassic.com/2nd-annual-kennett-classic-announced/
Located across the street from Kennett Classic's museum at the Garage
Community Center in downtown Kennett Square, PA (btwn Philadelphia and
Baltimore).
Classic Computing Workshop Hack-a-thon
If a day of vintage computer hacking sounds like fun, register to claim a
workspace for your vintage computing project. The Kennett Square area has
a lot of new hobbyists that would really benefit from the tutelage of
experienced CCTalk members interested in sharing their knowledge.
Exhibitors Show Their Stuff
Exhibitors wanted! This is your chance to show off your favorite
restoration project or your prized retro computer to the public. We have
had many visitors to Kennett Classic this year who expressed interest in
attending this event and are eager to experience how antique computers once
operated.
An Evening of Chiptunes and Computer Music
This year for Kennett Classic?s evening entertainment we have three
talented chiptune / waveform synthesizer music performers/bands.
Thanks for your support of this event.
Bill Degnan
vintagecomputer.netkennettclassic.com