16 Aug
2021
16 Aug
'21
3:16 p.m.
On Monday, August 16, 2021 at 14:20, Wayne Sudol wrote:
Out of curiosity, is there a reason you do not use
Acrobat for
creating pdfs?
Primarily because I have not purchased a license for Acrobat. Also, when I
started scanning manuals ten years ago, Al Kossow recommended tumble, which
worked well. And with source available, I've been able to extend it to
give me finer control over some aspects of PDF production.
-- Dave
17 Aug
17 Aug
10:47 a.m.
but? does tumble OVER compress? things?a lot of what we have we like? to? go? back and
pull nice? things? out? for? display...?In a message dated 8/16/2021 10:45:48 PM US
Mountain Standard Time, cctalk at classiccmp.org writes:?
On Monday, August 16, 2021 at 14:20, Wayne Sudol wrote:
Out of curiosity, is there a reason you do not use
Acrobat for
creating pdfs?
Primarily because I have not purchased a license for Acrobat.? Also, when I
started scanning manuals ten years ago, Al Kossow recommended tumble, which
worked well.? And with source available, I've been able to extend it to
give me finer control over some aspects of PDF production.
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? -- Dave
11:38 a.m.
On Aug 17, 2021, at 1:47 PM, ED SHARPE via cctalk
<cctalk at classiccmp.org> wrote:
but does tumble OVER compress things?
Over compress? The normal, and only really valid, practice with black & white
documents is lossless compression, where that term has no meaning.
There are those who don't understand that JPEG is intrinsically unfit for bitonal
material and line graphics of any kind. If you're dealing with the output of such,
then you may indeed have "overcompressed" material. But I believe the people
here all know better
paul
993
days inactive
994
days old
2 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
couryhouse＠aol.com -
jdbryan＠acm.org -
paulkoning＠comcast.net