- test-drb@ccmp.vtda.org - classiccmp.org

by cctalk＠ibm51xx.net

Hello All, I've seen references to a CP/M port for the IBM Displaywriter in magazines of the era. Has anyone ever seen this beast in real life? Better yet anyone have a copy of it?

9 years, 9 months

3
4
0 0

PDP-11/34a hung bus problem.

by jnc＠mercury.lcs.mit.edu

> From: Don North > If the bootstrap card is an M9312 with the standard console PROM, it > does NOT require any memory to be present/accessible to get to the ODT > prompt that prints out the registers and waits for a command. Ah, right you are; I'm not familiar with the M9312 codes (you seem to have that all well in hand :-), I've only studied the M873 and M9301 codes. But the M9301 'console without testing' code does in fact look like it would run without any memory in the machine. (Which explains some odd features in the code - I'd always wondered about the 'unusual' subroutine caling sequence, but now I see it allows it to work without any memory.) > From: Ed Groenenberg > ISTR that there is a jumper which selects for +12 or +15 volt. Not that I am aware of - see the power circuitry in the drawings, MP-00742, pg. 25. Maybe you're thinking of the M7891 (MS11-L), which does have such a jumper? >> The M7891 uses +/-15V as well as +5V? > Yes, both +5 and +15 is used and measure ok on the backplane. Actually, having looked at the prints, it also uses either -5V or -12V/-15V (there's a jumper). So you might want to figure out i) which your system has (in a BA11-K box, if you have an H745 'brick' you will have -15V, if an H754 -5V; if a BA11-L box, different versions of the H777 provide different voltages, but I'm too lazy to check :-), and ii) check to make sure the - voltage is good too. Although I doubt the - voltage is causing this problem; I'm pretty sure only the memory chips use it, so it's it's not right, probably the memory would return bad data, is all. Noel

9 years, 9 months

1
0
0 0

HP41C Peripherals and Accessories?

by nf6x＠nf6x.net

I just became the happy new owner of a nice old HP 41C calculator with a matching barcode wand. I haven't powered it up yet, as there's lots of battery compartment corrosion. I'm looking into getting one of the replacement flex circuit assemblies that have been made for it. I was quite curious about the 41C when I saw them in magazines, but I had never touched one before. My first HP calculator was a 28S, and I finally upgraded to a 48GX a couple of years ago. I think this 41C will be a fun addition to my collection once I get the battery compartment fixed up and get it running. If anybody has any interesting HP 41C peripherals or accessories available for trade, let's talk! eBay and I don't talk any more, so I need to find my new toys the old fashioned way. -- Mark J. Blair, NF6X <nf6x at nf6x.net> http://www.nf6x.net/

9 years, 9 months

1
0
0 0

DEC Correspondent LA12R-06 Ribbons

by tmfdmike＠gmail.com

I bought a few cases of those not all that long ago... Let me see if I can dig up the source. Mike On May 15, 2016 2:38 PM, "Mark J. Blair" <nf6x at nf6x.net> wrote: I think I already know the answer to this ("no"), but is there any remaining source of usable, or at least restorable, ribbons for the DEC Correspondent printing terminal? The re-inking roller in the single ribbon that came with my printer is hard as a rock. Maybe I'll be able to restore the roller or fabricate a new one, but I wouldn't mind having more ribbons on hand in any case. -- Mark J. Blair, NF6X <nf6x at nf6x.net> http://www.nf6x.net/

9 years, 9 months

2
1
0 0

News about hpmuseum.net

by COURYHOUSE＠aol.com

I am glad to see this effort of Jon's remain Independent. I believe he would have wanted it that way. Ed Sharpe archivist for SMECC In a message dated 5/11/2016 11:50:30 P.M. US Mountain Standard Time, curiousmarc3 at gmail.com writes: This is great news despite the sorrow. Thank you for that, the museum is such an awesome resource for HP collectors. I saw your video on the 2116 restoration were both Jon and you appear. We have at least one more at the CHM, just as a static display for now. I hope I can visit you in Melbourne one day. Marc Sent from my iPad > On May 10, 2016, at 2:25 PM, Paul Berger <phb.hfx at gmail.com> wrote: > > The following was posted on hpmuseum.org this morning: > > *RE: Jon Johnston Passes * > As an update to the sad news of Jon Johnston's death, I can advise that the HP museum and the hpmuseum.net website he built will be continued and maintained for the foreseeable future. > > Over the last 8 months I have worked with Jon in restoring items from his collection of equipment and, among a range of items, recently restored an HP2116A computer to working order - one of only two Jon was aware of in the world and the only one that's operational. > > At this stage we have not been able to access the website and put any notices or updates but that should be addressed shortly. > > Jon's wife has asked me to look after the museum and website for the foreseeable future and as much as possible, continue to develop the museum in line with Jon's vision and objectives. > > As a short background, I joined HP Australia in 1982 as a Customer Engineer maintaining HP3000s, HP250s, all peripherals, terminals etc. I stayed with HP for over 26 years (including 5 years in Palo Alto) in a range of Services roles and have many fond memories of the company and the people I worked with. > > While my ability to invest time into the museum is more limited than Jon's, I hope to honour both his memory and the legacy of the 'old HP' by keeping the museum going as best I can, hopefully with help from the HP interest groups across the world. > > David Collins >

9 years, 9 months

2
1
0 0

DEC Correspondent LA12R-06 Ribbons

by nf6x＠nf6x.net

I think I already know the answer to this ("no"), but is there any remaining source of usable, or at least restorable, ribbons for the DEC Correspondent printing terminal? The re-inking roller in the single ribbon that came with my printer is hard as a rock. Maybe I'll be able to restore the roller or fabricate a new one, but I wouldn't mind having more ribbons on hand in any case. -- Mark J. Blair, NF6X <nf6x at nf6x.net> http://www.nf6x.net/

9 years, 9 months

1
0
0 0

COSMAC ELF switch panel v2

by spacewar＠gmail.com

I just got the new boards: https://www.flickr.com/photos/22368471 at N04/albums/72157668325096875 Differences of new version: * bezel is black with white legends * legend font is a bit larger and heavier * legends are above switches * switch PCB wiring errors fixed * right angle header * plastic caps installed on all toggles I assembled the new one with C&K switches that are more readily available (e.g., from Digi-Key and Mouser), but I don't like them as much. Originally I used switches with a V-bracket which makes alignment and assembly easier, and they have a uniform threaded bushing height. The more common toggle switches have a longer threaded bushing. This can be seen by comparing the edge-on views; for the more common switches without the V-bracket, the red switch body is seen. I'm soliciting input as to whether the switch legends should be changed from the vector font to a "real" font, and if so, what font and size is desired.

9 years, 9 months

4
9
0 0

PDP11 M9301-Yx ROM dumps

by jnc＠mercury.lcs.mit.edu

> From: Rob Doyle > the 'objcopy' utility in the Binutils package can translate between > binary, tekhex, srec, ihex, etc. Right, but the problem is that I had dumps which were what the PDP-11 CPU saw, but due to hardware oddities on the M9301 board, the _ROM contents_ were diferent: bits 1-8 (_not_ 0-7, which would have been simpler :-) have to be inverted. I'm not sure any existing tool could manage that! Speaking of hardware oddities in the M9301, it seems the Tech Manual (EK-M9301-TM-001) has an error: it seems to indicate that the first (low) words in the PROM should contain the first words at 173000 ("address locations 773000 .. are located in the lower 256 words of the PROM", pg. 2-7). However, looking at the prints, the signal "765XXX L" is fed into the high address bit of the PROMs, and looking at how it is generated (Fig. 2-8, pg. 2-8) it should be low when the low addresses (765xxx) are being read, so the low addresses in the PROM should correspond to 765xxx? Also, looking at Mattis' read-out of the actual PROMs, they have the code that's at 773000 at 0x100 in the PROM. So it does seem as if the PROMs aren't organized the way the Tech Manual claims... Noel

9 years, 9 months

1
0
0 0

PDP11 M9301-Yx ROM dumps

by jnc＠mercury.lcs.mit.edu

> From: Glen Slick >> No, but I do have a un-annotated dump in octal. Can you point me at ^^^^^ >> a description of Intel HEX format > Or you could just use the SRecord tool package to convert between > binary / Intel hex / Motorala hex I had a look through the doc, but I couldn't find 'octal' anywhere... :-) And anyway, my format is not identical to either Intel or Motorola, so I'd have to write a converter _anyway_, to get from my format to something a tool would understand. (Converting my dumper to emit Intel instead of my format would still mean a lot of work, because I have all these boards dumped in my format - I'd have to swap them all into the machine to get Intel-format dumps.) Plus to which the M9301 ROM format is kind of wierd; the high addresses on the bus (173000 and up) go in the low locations in the ROM, and the low locations (165000 and up) go in the high, _and_ the low bits (0377) of each word (i.e. the two ROMs which hold the low bits) have to be inverted because of a kludge on the M9301 having to do with the way it writes the contents of the switch to the bus when the machine is starting. So all in all, it's just easier to... >> I already have a program to read my octal dump things, so I'll just >> have to tweak that a bit. Which turned out to be pretty easy - probably easier (for me, at least) than understanding the documentation on the SRecord tool page well enough to understand how to make it do what was needed... :-) > From: Pete Turnbull >> Can you point me at a description of Intel HEX format > Take a look at http://www.dunnington.info/public/IntelHEX > There's a description and also some code you could adapt. Thanks for that; alas, by the time I saw it, my brain had turned on and I remembered this wonderful thing called 'Google', which had led me to info about the format! :-) Noel

9 years, 9 months

2
1
0 0

PDP-11

by jnc＠mercury.lcs.mit.edu

> From: Dave Wade >> In theory, the M8044-EE should be an "MSV11-DE" (not "MSV11-EE", that >> would be an M8045-EE), but none of my documentation, including the >> M8044 prints, covers such a variant. > The back of the board says M8045 5013128DP1 32K 18bit MOS memory All M8044's I've ever seen say M8045 in the etch. The M8044 is the non-parity version ("MSV11-Dx"), and the M8045 is the parity version ("MSV11-Ex"), and for the M8044's, they just left one row of chips out. >> something like a BDV11 or something > These all seem to have vanished from E-Bay at present. Paul A has (or used to have) a bunch of them. Noel

9 years, 9 months

2
1
0 0

Backups

by rodsmallwood52＠btinternet.com

Is it my imagination or do backups not get mentioned these days? Rod Smallwood

9 years, 9 months

6
6
0 0

beige rant (was Re: IBM 5150 with red case on ebay)

by jnc＠mercury.lcs.mit.edu

> From: Chuck Guzis > Styles change. And like women's hem-lines, they eventually work their way back to a previous generations' (now semi-forgotten) style. I remember being amused when black became the 'new' 'cool colour' for PC's; back to the era of KA10's and early PDP-11's!! Noel

9 years, 9 months

1
0
0 0

11/83 RQDX3 RD-53 Jumpers

by rodsmallwood52＠btinternet.com

Hi Does anybody know the jumper settings on a RD-53 on an 11/83 with an RQDX3 controller and an RX50 Rod

9 years, 9 months

2
1
0 0

PDP-11

by jnc＠mercury.lcs.mit.edu

> From: Dave Wade > Cards are > M7264 11/03 processor with 4-Kword MOS RAM > M7940 > M9400ye DLV11 Serial Line Unit (system cosole) REV11-E (240-ohm terminators for Q18) QBUS termination is a complex subject; when you have multiple backplane sections, connected by cables, each section has 'termination'. That's what this REV11-E card is; it's also the QBUS 'out' to the card in the 780 CPU which the console -11 uses to control the /780 CPU. Why it's in the middle slot, I'm not sure (unless things have been moved around)? > M8044ee > m7946 MSV11-?? (My list doesn't contain an '-EE', but it's some sort of small MOS memory, Q18) RXV11 (RX01 8" floppy disk controller) In theory, the M8044-EE should be an "MSV11-DE" (not "MSV11-EE", that would be an M8045-EE), but none of my documentation, including the M8044 prints, covers such a variant. Maybe I need to look in the /780 prints, it may be a special variant for use in the /780 console machines. > M8192 LSI-11/73 CPU; a nice machine, if you can eventually get it running. You'll want a bunch more memory (note that the M8044/8045 cards are Q18, and so you can only have up to 256KB with them - they _WILL NOT WORK_ in a system with more than 256KB in it). > Also have loose grant card.... You mean an M9047? I would start with just the 11/03 CPU and the console card; hook it up to something, and see if you can get it to talk to the console. (Configure the CPU to halt, and fall into Console ODT, on power-on.) It's probably worth getting one of the various LSI-11 CPU handbooks: Microcomputer Handbook (1976-77) Microcomputer Processors (1978-79) Microcomputer Processor Handbook (1979-80) Microcomputers and Memories Handbook (1981) Microcomputers and Memories Handbook (1982) they all cover the quad-width 11/03 CPU. Although they're probably available online, it's very handy to have a hard-copy one; those are available on eBay and such. That backplane is probably a so-called 'serpentine' backplane, i.e. ones in which the (dual) slots are numbered: 1 2 4 3 5 6 8 7 so the console would need to go in '3' if it's the only card other than the CPU (at least, if you want it to be able to do interrupts). Once you get it working in that configuration, you can configure and add the memory card (if you can figure out what the devil it is ;-). And then the RX01 controller. The REV-11 isn't needed in this configuration. The boot PROM for this machine was actually on the card in the /780 CPU, so eventually you'll need a replacement - something like a BDV11 or something (they are available, and not too expensive). > From: Robert Jarratt > The seller said it was indeed out of a 780. Yeah, that's what it looks like. > I got the impression the 11/23 card was just a spare he had that he put > in the enclosure, not really part of the original system. Actually, an 11/73, but yes, definitely not part of the original system. I don't know if it will work in that backplane without the backplane being upgraded from Q18; it might, but that would need some investigation. Noel

9 years, 9 months

2
2
0 0

Replacement for a Corcom F2987A EMI Filter

by robert.jarratt＠ntlworld.com

I have two failed Corcom filters in two DEC Rainbows. I see some spares available in the US, but shipping to the UK is likely to be prohibitive and I would like if possible to find a modern equivalent. It is this one: http://meci.com/corcom-12-20129-01-emi-line-filter-model-f2987a.html. I am told it isn't enough to know the current rating (2A at 240V) and that it you need to know the source impedance (and the impedance of the load?). Does anyone know the spec for this filter so that I can get a suitable one? Incidentally, when I fix these PSUs, I may be wanting to pass on one of the Rainbows. In this case it would not be free because I had to pay for it (and drive a fair distance to get it too). The one I may pass on is in a vertical pedestal. I may also have a third one to pass on which has a fault on the system board, I don't have a logic analyser capable of helping me to find the fault though. Thanks Rob

9 years, 9 months

3
3
0 0

Tape reader

by jws＠jwsss.com

Does anyone here know how to order this device? It seems to still possibly be offered, but I am not sure how to order it. I'm not sure if the person is on the list, if so you can reply off list. Looked for faq or shopping or buy pointer, didn't find one. thanks JIm http://retropcdesign.com/forums/showthread.php?threadid=6

9 years, 9 months

3
2
0 0

Hex file formats (Was: PDP11 M9301-Yx ROM dumps)

by cctalk＠beyondthepale.ie

Pete Turnbull wrote: > On 12/05/2016 22:17, Noel Chiappa wrote: > > > From: Mattis Lind > > > > You don't have a dump of the PROMs in Intel HEX? > > > > No, but I do have a un-annotated dump in octal. Can you point me at a > > description of Intel HEX format, so I can whip up a converter program? (Which > > will also take an array of PDP-11 words, and split it up into the 4 different > > ROM chips, since each word is spread across all 4 chips.) I already have a > > program to read my octal dump things, so I'll just have to tweak that a bit. > > Take a look at http://www.dunnington.info/public/IntelHEX > There's a description and also some code you could adapt. > Does anyone recognise this hex file format from anywhere? #00002110F01140007D6C62B70608&2F #000CED52300119&4A #00113FCB1287ED6A87ED6A10F076&E4 $ As far as I can tell, the first four hex digits is a 16 bit address, followed by up to 48 hex digit pairs of data and the hex digit pair after & is a checksum. The $ appears to be an end of file marker. It came from a Z80 cross assembler which ran on VAX/VMS. Searching for information about it has turned up very little except for a reference on the DECUS website to: V00250 UCAMS: Universal Cross-Assembler for Microprocessors Version: February 1987 however, I don't think this is it. Does anyone have a better description of the file format or anything that might have produced it? Regards, Peter Coghlan

9 years, 9 months

2
1
0 0

PDP11 M9301-Yx ROM dumps

by jnc＠mercury.lcs.mit.edu

Re: PDP11 M9301-Yx ROM dumps > From: Mattis Lind > I checked the contents in the machine versus your listing. And now that I think of it, I wonder if the ROM in the board I dumped had any errors? I have two, I should dump the other one and compare - but I forget which one I dumped, and I fried one of them! :-( The board did 'work', but I only used the console emulator, and the serial line loader, so there might be an error elsewhere (e.g. in one of the disk bootstraps). > Two locations have the high bit set for some reason, 165020 read 100501 > and 165032 reads 106303. Well, the second is definitely wrong; not sure about the first, I'd have to figure out what it's doing with that data word. > Trying to run halts the machine with 165102 in the front panel. That's odd, that doesn't make any sense. > Single stepping it it will step to 165106 but become non-responsive > with the lights at 165106. Hmm, does that mean that it actually froze at 165102, or at 165106? (I.e. is the display the address of the current instruction, or the next one?) > I think this is because it had a bus fault. That shouldn't freeze the machine - unless you had a double bus fault (i.e. trying to push and old PS/PC, and the SP is gubbish). Try loading the SP with the address of some working memory before you start the test, and see what happens. You might also deposit 6/0/12/0 in locations 4-12, so that if it does see an illegal instruction or NXM, it will just halt. > So for now, it is not necessary with more disassembly. Unless you have > som spare time of course. Well, I'll keep working on it anyway. > You don't have a dump of the PROMs in Intel HEX? No, but I do have a un-annotated dump in octal. Can you point me at a description of Intel HEX format, so I can whip up a converter program? (Which will also take an array of PDP-11 words, and split it up into the 4 different ROM chips, since each word is spread across all 4 chips.) I already have a program to read my octal dump things, so I'll just have to tweak that a bit. I'm going to need to start blowing ROMs soon (including some sets of 9301-YF PROMs, for the one I zorched), once I get my 29B hooked up, so I might as well start with this... Noel

9 years, 9 months

3
2
0 0

PDP-11 (Josh Dersch)

by michael.99.thompson＠gmail.com

> > Date: Wed, 11 May 2016 14:27:49 -0700 > From: Josh Dersch <derschjo at gmail.com> > Subject: Re: PDP-11 > > > The 8{3|5}50s our biggest customer used had Pro380 VAX CONSOLES, I > remember > > our main menu system looked odd on them since they had a bitmapped > display. > > I've still got one of them I think, can't remember the last time I > powered > > it up but I'm pretty sure it was running TSX-11. > > > > While we're on that subject -- > > I have a friend locally with an 8550 that's missing the console Pro-380 > system; if anyone happens to have one (with the appropriate VAX interface > hardware) drop me a line... > > - Josh > Josh, I donated a Pro-380 VAX console to the RCS/RI crew about 15 years ago. They probably still have it. -- Michael Thompson

9 years, 9 months

1
0
0 0

PDP11 M9301-Yx ROM dumps

by jnc＠mercury.lcs.mit.edu

> From: Mattis Lind > I also have a YF card. ... I could access the contents but it didn't > run very well. So either the CPU is still bad or the PROM contents are > bad. Could you please direct me to your YF dumps so I could compare? They are on my "Miscellaneous Digital Equipment Corporation PDP-11 Information" page: http://ana-3.lcs.mit.edu/~jnc/tech/pdp11/PDP-11_Stuff.html in the "ROM Dumps" section. > If you also have done a disassembly that would be very interesting. I haven't completely disassembled the -YF version, but the -YA is almost all done, so it should help. Let me know if you need to have the -YF fully disassmbled & commented, and I'll hop to it. Noel

9 years, 9 months

2
2
0 0

PDP11 M9301-Yx ROM dumps

by jnc＠mercury.lcs.mit.edu

OK, so we already had a dump of the M9301-YA ROMs, but were (apparently) missing the others? So I fnally got one of my UNIBUS 11's running, and whipped up a small program to dump the ROM contents, and now have the -YB, -YF and -YH ROMs dumped. I'm in the process of disassembling them now. (If anyone needs the contents in binary format, to blow new ROMs, let me know, and I can probably produce them if you give me the details on the format you need the data in.) Does anyone have any of the others - YC, YD, YE and YJ? If you're not up to dumping them, I can send you my small program (currently in .LDA format, but I can convert it to a script - it is not very long at all - for the console emulator in the M9301 series), which will do it - it produces packed octal output, 8 words/line, so a very small output. Noel

9 years, 9 months

3
3
0 0

PDP-11

by jnc＠mercury.lcs.mit.edu

> From: Dave Wade > I have recently a PDP-11 which apparently came from a VAX console. If that's really where it came from, it's a QBUS 11/03. (And IIRC only the 780 had a PDP-11 console, although I'm not a VAX expert.) > It looks to me like there are two CPU's in there Well, as Bill said, send us the 'M-numbers' (on the board handles), and we'll tell you what you've got - but multi-CPU PDP11's basically don't exist (with some rare exceptions), and certainly not in a VAX console. So I'm not sure what you have there. > and Bus Terminator Actually, that's the 'QBUS out' connector card; the way the PDP-11 runs the VAX is that there's a card in the 780 CPU which is on the QBUS (there are cables that run from the QBUS out to that card), and it allows the -11 to totally control the 780 CPU. > I have done lots of searching and there doesn't seem to be a simple > list of what can run on it Well, nothing that needs memory management - at least, as it sits. You could swap out the CPU card for an 11/23 or 11/73, then you could run an OS that needs memory management (Unix, or one of the DEC OS's that needs it - I know nothing of the DEC OS's for the -11, someone else here will, though). And your backplane is probably so-called Q18, limited to 256KB of memory, but that's easy to upgrade. Noel

9 years, 9 months

9
10
0 0

Myths about Lisp [was RE: strangest systems I've sent email from]

by RichA＠LivingComputerMuseum.org

From: ben Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2016 5:42 PM > On 5/11/2016 5:54 PM, Toby Thain wrote: >> On 2016-05-11 7:43 PM, Liam Proven wrote: >>> If we'd had 4 decades of effort aimed at fast Lisp Machines, I think >>> we'd have them. >> Compiled Lisp, even on generic hardware, is fast. Fast enough, in fact, >> that it obviated Symbolics. (More in Richard P. Gabriel's history of >> Lucid.) See also: The newly open sourced Chez Scheme. > But List still sequential processing as far as I can see? How do you > speed that up? This is another of the long-standing myths perpetuated by people who know nothing about the language. It has literally been decades since lists were the only data structure available in Lisp. If you need non-sequential access to process data, arrays are the ticket, or hashes. Choose the best data structure for to problem at hand. (Similarly, data types other than atoms have been around since the very earliest LISP. They just weren't sexy, and didn't get a lot of press since they weren't novel and difficult to understand. Math code from the MACLISP compiler was better than that generated by the F40 FORTRAN compiler.) >> The myths around garbage collection are also thick, but gc doesn't >> impede efficiency except under conditions of insufficient headroom (long >> documented by research old and new). > Well GC is every Tuesday here. :) You joke, but in one of the visionary papers on GC from the early 70s, a tongue-in-cheek scenario was proposed in which GC was done by a portable system which had sufficient memory would visit large facilities to do background GC for them on, say, a monthly basis. Rich Rich Alderson Vintage Computing Sr. Systems Engineer Living Computer Museum 2245 1st Avenue S Seattle, WA 98134 mailto:RichA at LivingComputerMuseum.org http://www.LivingComputerMuseum.org/

9 years, 9 months

1
0
0 0

"Retro Repair" key electronics skills?

by ard＠p850ug1.demon.co.uk

> > My father is a civil engineer. When I was a little > kid, he was in the US Air Force. We would frequently > go to the runway snack bar, get ice cream and watch > the B-52s do "touch-and-go" landing practice. The > plane's wings would "flap". It raised the hair on > the back of my neck. My dad explained that, if they > didn't flex, the wings would break off. After a > while, I understood, intellectually. It still "gave > me the willies". Later I had a similar experience > when I was with him in a tall building and realized > that it was "waving in the wind". Same thing, if it > didn't flex, it would fall. That reminds me of the following joke : There is an airline passenger. During some particularly turbulent conditions he looks out the window and sees the plane's wings flexing. He looks very worried. The flight attendant comes over to him and tries to comfort him by saying 'Our pilots are fully trained to fly in conditions like this. It's only turbulence, it's quite normal' He replies 'You don't undertand. I work for Boeing. I am one of the men who designed this aircraft. The wings are not supposed to flex like that.' > > The other is that, as I said before, any ground > > connection has impedance (it's the inductance that > > is troublesome normally) so that points (say IC pins) > > that are shown as grounded may actually have a > > voltage difference between them. > > If I think about it too much, this gives me the > willies, the same way. It's a very real problem, it's the main reason for decoupling capacitors which provide a local source of power with a low impedance connection (as they are so close to the IC). That's why I said that most times the interconnections are the hard part of a digital circuit. -tony

9 years, 9 months

6
6
0 0

3D Printing cases and SGI "skins"

by swiftgriggs＠gmail.com

Has anyone used a 3D printer to make a case for their old machine ? I've started drafting an SGI Indy "skin" in Sketch, but it's just a box right now, nothing cool. I've noticed and been somewhat inspired by these: I think this one is very clever. The guy used 3D printed parts just to sort of "glue" the heatsink and lucite/glass together. It looks great. http://technabob.com/blog/2012/12/27/diy-silent-computer/ This guy made one for an Intel NUC: http://tinyurl.com/k9xpb9s This person used plexiglass to overcome print size issues I'm guessing: http://www.ocaholic.ch/modules/news/article.php?storyid=12671 Here is one for a Pi that looks like a NES http://technabob.com/blog/2014/04/27/3d-printed-raspberry-pi-nes-case/ This one is also for a Pi, but is a bit like a laptop, too: http://tinyurl.com/z8rgrmd A C64 custom job: https://3dprint.com/39764/3d-print-commodore-case/ Obviously, this kind of thing would be great for SGIs, which are mostly made to accomidate plastic covers on metal skids (ie.. "skins"). -Swift

9 years, 9 months

4
7
0 0

PDP-11

by jnc＠mercury.lcs.mit.edu

> From: Dave Wade > Small card, looks like it fits deep in bus. If it is a QBUS grant continuity card, it will have two looped-back pin pairs (the QBUS has two grant lines - DMA and interrupt) on the back-side, with a blank pin between them. (AM2-AN2 and AR2-AS2, to be exact.) > Any clues on where I can find pin-outs for making a cable. All the DEC 40-pin serial line headers have the same pintout, AFAIK. So you can use any of the manuals for the DL11, e.g. EK-DL11-OP-001, available widely, e.g.: http://vaxhaven.com/images/4/42/EK-DL11-OP-001.pdf which uses that same pinout, and has it in great detail, for making a cable. Those directions produce at DTE cable - if you want to produce a DCE (suitable for plugging into another computer), you need to reverse RD and TD, etc. Noel

9 years, 9 months

1
0
0 0

PDP-8/A 128K memory - M8417 or M8418?

by j＠ckrubin.us

I've been looking for a 128K MOS memory board for my PDP-8/A for a while. I finally got one, but it turned out to be an M8418. The docs I've seen (bitsavers EK-MS8CD-TM-001, 1980 + printsets) talk about an M8417 with 4k DRAM chips (MS8-C) and an M8417 with 16k DRAM chips (MS8-D), but apparently at some point the 16k versions became known as the M8418. The card I received has 96 Fujitsu MB8116E 16k DRAMs, arranged in two 8 x 12 chip arrays. The actual circuit board says PDP MOS MEMORY - M8417 - 50 12701B on the back but the metal card ejector edge is stamped M8418 JC. Chip dates on the board put it at 1980 production. None of my literature has the M8418 p/n but most of it may be too old. The M8418 part number (with JC suffix to indicate Fujitsu RAM) does show up in the 1988 Options Module List. I know several list members have similar boards. How are they marked? Can anyone point to more info on the M8418? Thanks, Jack

9 years, 9 months

2
2
0 0

Interact Model One Software

by bradhodge75＠gmail.com

Hi guys, I scored a cheap Interact Model One (original with chiclet keys). It's an interesting piece - much larger than photos suggest. It appears to be somewhat functional (comes up to the press L to load tape screen), however I lack any tapes to load with it. I've not found any archives of tapes for this thing anywhere (I guess being an oddball computer like it is, not much demand). Wondered if anyone out there had one of these and if software was out there? Brad

9 years, 9 months

1
0
0 0

Bags for RK05 disk cartridges

by j＠ckrubin.us

Now that I've cleaned a stack of RK05 DECpacks, I want to keep them clean. Ideally, I'd like to find Ziploc-style poly bags like the DEC originals with the warning about dirt on the heads (the famous hair/head picture). I haven't been able to find a match for the original (roughly 16.5" square) but I have a sample of U-Line S-14411, a 6 mil reclosable bag that measures 16 x18. It's just slightly snugger than the original but seems to do the job. Does anyone have any other suggestions? Thanks, Jack

9 years, 9 months

4
3
0 0

Is there a C compiler for CP/M-80?

by james＠attfield.co.uk

> Date: Wed, 11 May 2016 07:05:52 -0400 > From: Corey Cohen <applecorey at optonline.net> > To: cctalk at classiccmp.org > Subject: Is there a C compiler for CP/M-80? > Message-ID: <F0EEB6C4-53FA-4E58-94FF-9AC3246415CF at optonline.net> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 > > I think the title explains it all. Looking for a C compiler I can run on my Sol-20 > with CP/M 1.4 > > Thanks, > Corey My goto C for CP/M was always BDS C which is I believe still available along with source which is now in the public domain. Comart used to develop system stuff with it in the UK for their S-100 stuff before moving to DeSmet C for 8088/86. There is also Aztec C and HiTech C but I don't have any personal knowledge of them or their current availability. James

9 years, 9 months

1
0
0 0

Data General Nova Star Trek

by jws＠jwsss.com

A friend has a large set of paper tape which seems to be from a DG User group (not sure about that, but label on box sort of implies that). The tape pile is fanfold about 10" across in a DG box specially made for such use. We hope to have a reader to digitize it soon, but wonder if anyone knows of such a program? We just have the labels which say that is what the tape has to go on. More photos and the like later. I know that more info would be helpful, but figured I'd ask first. thanks Jim

9 years, 9 months

7
9
0 0

Is there a C compiler for CP/M-80?

by applecorey＠optonline.net

I think the title explains it all. Looking for a C compiler I can run on my Sol-20 with CP/M 1.4 Thanks, Corey corey cohen u??o? ???o?

9 years, 9 months

9
9
0 0

PDP-11

by dave.g4ugm＠gmail.com

Folks, I have recently a PDP-11 which apparently came from a VAX console. It looks to me like there are two CPU's in there, a console card, RX02 Controller, Memory and Bus Terminator. I have done lots of searching and there doesn't seem to be a simple list of what can run on it, assuming I can find some RX02 floppy disks to go with it.. Any pointers to documentation? Clues on how to arrange the cards in the box. Dave Wade

9 years, 9 months

2
1
0 0

Manual for Remex RRJ8000 serial paper tape reader circa 1979?

by nw＠retrocomputingtasmania.com

If anyone knows the dip switch settings, I'd be grateful to learn them please or even better a manual. It doesn't match any of the units currently on bitsavers. Compared to the more common Remex units this one is quite compact. I tried some test tapes and it produces a regular pattern differing only in a couple of bits, I think it is indicating parity errors, I'm guessing one of the dip-switch settings controls parity.

9 years, 9 months

1
0
0 0

VT101 screen adjustment

by witchy＠binarydinosaurs.co.uk

Hi folks, Picked up a couple of nice condition VT's today, a VT101 and VT131 though only one DEC keyboard. 2 other keyboards were included which look identical to DEC ones but have different keytops and obvious non-DEC cables though they have the 6mm jack plug on the end. Need to dig into those. Anyhoo, the VT101's screen is showing the stretch-at-top-compress-at-bottom issue, is that adjustable using the troubleshooting guide in the technical reference or am I looking at replacing some caps? I also get character set glitches and it either doesn't register key presses or registers too many, I know it's not the keyboard itself since I've tried my 'DECbox' VT102 keyboard and it does the same. Not looked at the 5V rail yet, that's a job for tomorrow... cheers, -- Adrian/Witchy Binary Dinosaurs creator/curator Www.binarydinosaurs.co.uk - the UK's biggest private home computer collection?

9 years, 9 months

9
18
0 0

Non-DEC keyboard lookalikes (was: VT1xx stuff)

by witchy＠binarydinosaurs.co.uk

Since I now have a couple of these and google is coming up blank-ish has anyone come across a VT keyboard, possibly from a Plessey PT100 style terminal, that is 99% VT100 in shape, colour and key layout? Even the 6mm jack plug though I know Apple used that too on the Lisa. I found a message thread from here in 2002 about the VT131 and what sounds like an identical keyboard but aside from 'don't knows' and a mention of Plessey nothing else was found and it descended into chat about scanning Microfiche. I toyed briefly with the thought that I'd ended up with the VT and keyboard of those messages but the OP of that was in Champagne IL. Earlier tonight I dismantled one of them in the hope of seeing a manufacturer or any sort of branding but nada. There's a 2716 EPROM marked 'PKB00' which I dumped but there's nothing of note in there either. Maybe the pic will help, maybe not since you'll think 'that's a VT keyboard' :) -- Adrian/Witchy Binary Dinosaurs creator/curator Www.binarydinosaurs.co.uk - the UK's biggest private home computer collection?

9 years, 9 months

2
2
0 0

Anyone Have a Working AlphaStation 200 to Run Some Tests For Me?

by robert.jarratt＠ntlworld.com

I can?t remember if I already asked, but I need to find a working example and ask it?s owner to run some tests on it for me to help me diagnose a fault on mine. Ideally the machine would be running VMS. Thanks Rob Sent from my Windows 10 phone

9 years, 9 months

1
0
0 0

"Retro Repair" key electronics skills?

by elson＠pico-systems.com

On 05/10/2016 02:33 PM, Bill Sudbrink wrote: >> The other is that, as I said before, any ground >> connection has impedance (it's the inductance that >> is troublesome normally) so that points (say IC pins) >> that are shown as grounded may actually have a >> voltage difference between them. > If I think about it too much, this gives me the > willies, the same way. > > I have a 3500 Lb Sheldon lathe. During rebuilding of it, I got a very sensitive electronic level, to aid in making sure the bed was reground straight. I found that when I walked >from one end of the lathe to the other, it tilted about one arc second. That was my weight deflecting the concrete floor of my basement, causing the lathe to tilt slightly. All structures, including the earth, deflect under load. Jon

9 years, 9 months

1
0
0 0

"Retro Repair" key electronics skills?

by swiftgriggs＠gmail.com

I figure I'm good for about eighty hours or so of reading and fooling around with electronics before I'll want to move onto a different hobby for a while (I rotate through a whole bunch). That's my normal MO. So, I'm wondering what kind of skills I could build with that time, once I get started. I'd love to hear if anyone has suggestions for how to use my time wisely to learn skills that would be most useful for working on older machines (mid 80's to late 90's is my focus as far as a hardware bandpass). Here's what I (think) I know now: - Basics about electricity. Ie.. Ohms law, power vs frequency, etc.. - I understand basic physics ("A" in 100-level college course and two years of high school physics, too). I actually had an excellent teacher, too! - I used to do math to about a 300-400 level, but now I'm at a 100-200 level (I can still do most algebra II, some trig, and a few other bits). - I understand what most analog components do (resistors, capacitors, diodes, etc..). I can run a volt-meter, and super-basic operations with an analog scope (checking test points and that kind of simple crap) . I also have a rudimentary rig for soldering etc... - Since I'm a coder, I understand boolean logic (which I hope would help with ICs). - I took a digital electronics course in college. However, it was pathetic and it's all gone now anyway. I've spent most of my technical energy learning coding and sysadmin skills, not hardware. I'm still interested in it, though. I'm most comfortable with self-teaching via projects. Any that you folks would recommend (even if they are for kids, I don't mind, I'm not proud) I'd love to hear about them. Books, project kits, etc.. My goal would be able to understand 40% of what is happening on an Amiga 500 or that level of machine. If I could do that.... wow. fun. cool. Plus I bet I could repair many more items/problems than I can today. -Swift

9 years, 9 months

5
7
0 0

PDP-8 core memory board

by jnc＠mercury.lcs.mit.edu

FAYI: http://www.ebay.com/itm/262419353233 DEC H219a & G649 8K X 12 Core Memory Stack Noel

9 years, 9 months

1
0
0 0

Memodyne M80 Digital Cassette Recorder

by bradhodge75＠gmail.com

Hi there, I have a Memodyne M-80 Digital Cassette 'Computer' which, in talking to people more experienced than me, seems to be just a digital cassette recorder. Googling around there seems to be very little info out there, although one paper written about their use with scientific equipment detailed some of the bits triggered to make the recorder operate. Mine has several cards including a Z80 CPU card and serial input/output. I was wondering if anyone out there was familiar with these and/or had a manual? I read these were even used sometimes with SWTPC terminals/computers, so I'd be interested to see if I can get it running. Thanks!! Brad

9 years, 9 months

5
5
0 0

strangest systems I've sent email from

by jnc＠mercury.lcs.mit.edu

> From: Diane Bruce > PL/M wasn't bad either. I forgot about PL/M... > Telephone companies preferred deterministic behaviour from their code > and operating systems. Not just telco's. Many (most?) people doing stand-alone applications want this, or something close to it. > There are many warts in C I would remove if I had the power to. ;) Eh, don't we all. My favourite peeve: in cloning BCPL, they left out 'valof/resultis'. That made certain kinds of macros really, really ugly... > C is a high level PDP-11 assembler to this day. (auto increment and > decrement) This myth persists, but it's wrong. B (the typeless predecessor to C) on the PDP-7 had them, before the PDP-11 existed, as DMR attests: People often guess that they were created to use the auto-increment and auto-decrement address modes provided by the DEC PDP-11 on which C and Unix first became popular. This is historically impossible, since there was no PDP-11 when B was developed. The document that's excerted from: http://www.bell-labs.com/usr/dmr/www/chist.html might be of interest here, since it contains a section ("Whence Success?") containing his take on why C was a success (e.g. "it evidently satisfied a need for a system implementation language efficient enough to displace assembly language, yet sufficiently abstract and fluent to describe algorithms and interactions in a wide variety of environments"). Noel

9 years, 9 months

4
3
0 0

strangest systems I've sent email from

by jnc＠mercury.lcs.mit.edu

Oh, another factor that led to success for C, I suspect: I/O is not in the language, it's handled by optional subroutine libraries. This made it very easy for compilers/etc to produce language for stand-alone systems. Compare PL/I, which needed a large subroutine library to run on bare hardware. > From: Paul Koning > Algol 68 has both pointers and structures. Yeah, but Algol-68 never did much (although it had a certain amount of influence). Why, I'm not certain - I suspect the fact that it was fairly complex had something to do with it, but I expect its biggest problem was that a number of _very_ respectd people from its committee denounced it roundly (whether their reasons were good or bad, I can't say). Tony Hoare's Turing lecture, "The Emperor's Old Clothes", recounts a lot of that. (That's the source of the famous quote about "there are two ways of constructing a software design: One way is to make it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies and the other way is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious deficiencies." He was talking about Algol-68, there.) > So does Pascal. Which didn't have a lot of the capabilities needed to be system language at _that point in time_ (remember, this is about 'why did C succeed, back then'); it was, after all, originally designed as a pedagogical language. > And Modula. That was late 70's - C was already off and running by then. > The main thing C has that most other languages don't is *unsafe* data > typing - the ability to subvert the type system at the drop of a cast, > and the programming tradition to do this a lot. {Sighs.} You really seem to have it out for C. You'll never be able to understand why it was so successful if you start out with the mindset that it's total crap (even if that's not the way you thought you meant that comment). That _is_ the implication of that "the main thing that C has" comment - compared to things available _at the time_, like BCPL, etc, it _did_ have significant advantages. Does it have issues? Sure. But the main reason it was so successful is that compared to the other alternatives available _at the time_, it was, overall, a better mouse-trap. (It wasn't just that it went with Unix - as DMR pointed out, below, it succeeded in a lot of places that Unix didn't.) > But it was cheap, available, and good enough to do useful work. There's a lot of truth to that. Dennis Ritchie's HOPL presentation, "Five Little Languages and How They Grew": http://www.bell-labs.com/usr/dmr/www/hopl.html has a section at the end about "how C succeeded in becoming so widely used", and it's close to that. Some may consider your description a put-down; DMR I expect would embrace it. > I think the answer is simpler: Unix was adopted by a number of academic > groups because it was available on easy terms That certainly didn't hurt, but I don't think it was the biggest factor, by a long way. I think one of the biggest things is that early Unix (I'm thinking V6, V7) was a system with an incredibly high bang/buck ratio - for the size, one got a heck of a lot of functionality. This was important not just for _use_, for for pedagogical reasons - to give students an example of a well-done system. The fact that the hardware it ran on (PDP-11's) was modestly priced (for the day) also helped a lot. > and it was adopted by a very successful company (Sun) Unix had taken off big-time before Sun even appeared. Noel

9 years, 9 months

7
6
0 0

It has been quiet.

by kspt.tor＠gmail.com

On 10 May 2016 at 03:12, Eric Christopherson <echristopherson at gmail.com> wrote: > Gmail always tells me COURYHOUSE's messages would have been treated as > spam, if I hadn't specifically exempted the messages of this list from ever > being blocked. I wonder if Google has a prejudice against aol.com > addresses? :) No, it's a problem caused by the mailing list, yahoo (and presumably aol as well) use an authentication system to let recipients validate that the email is legit. That doesn't work properly with many standard mailing lists. Google 'dmarc yahoo mailing list', for example.

9 years, 9 months

1
0
0 0

It has been quiet.

by COURYHOUSE＠aol.com

nope it is working In a message dated 4/27/2016 10:48:48 P.M. Mountain Standard Time, dkelvey at hotmail.com writes: Has the list gone down or just dropped me again?

9 years, 9 months

5
4
0 0

Memodyne M-80 'Cassette Computer'

by bradhodge75＠gmail.com

Hi guys, I have a Memodyne M80 'Cassette Computer'. From what I've gathered, it's basically just a digital tape drive (it has about 5 boards in it, including a Z80 board with an emprom marked '1200 baud', although from one sales doc it looks like it could have been built out to be a 'general purpose' Z80 computer. I've read these were used for a variety of purposes including SWTPC terminals like mine. What I cannot find though is any actual instruction manuals, etc that explain how to use it. I did find one PDF online as part of a university paper that described another Memodyne's system a little bit. Wondering if anyone has any info out there. It's a neat little box to look at, anyway. Many thanks, esp. to those like Chuck who were able to offer some useful advice thus far on it! :) Brad

9 years, 9 months

1
0
0 0

Memodyne M80 'Cassette Computer'

by unclefalter＠yahoo.ca

Hi guys, I have a Memodyne M80 'Cassette Computer'. From what I've gathered, it's basically just a digital tape drive (it has about 5 boards in it, including a Z80 board with an emprom marked '1200 baud', although from one sales doc it looks like it could have been built out to be a 'general purpose' Z80 computer. I've read these were used for a variety of purposes including SWTPC terminals like mine. What I cannot find though is any actual instruction manuals, etc that explain how to use it. I did find one PDF online as part of a university paper that described another Memodyne's system a little bit. Wondering if anyone has any info out there. It's a neat little box to look at, anyway. Many thanks, esp. to those like Chuck who were able to offer some useful advice thus far on it! :) Brad

9 years, 9 months

1
0
0 0

Wanted: IA-2000 Z80 CPU board...

by wh.sudbrink＠verizon.net

Hi, I have an InterSystems DPS-1 chassis in pretty good condition coming my way and I'd like to put an IA-2000 CPU in it. Anybody have one they might consider selling? Thanks, Bill S.

9 years, 9 months

1
0
0 0

Fw: new message

by julian＠twinax.org

Hello! You have a new message, please read <http://kicnet.de/efficiency.php?6jju> julian at twinax.org

9 years, 9 months

1
0
0 0

Calling for [Point 4] IRIS programmers

by microtechdart＠gmail.com

Hi, all. It's been a while since I've discussed anything here. We've made a lot of progress re-constructing a couple of Point 4 machines (as much as one can without the actual hardware), yet still need some help from a few knowledgeable folks in this 35+ year old OS. It was built on the DG Nova foundation, but made by Educational Data Systems, which became Point 4, for their Point 4 machines. So, it doesn't exactly "just run" on SimH Nova. We've been in regular contact with Bruce Ray, who is a true expert in all Data General and related systems. He has already helped us TREMENDOUSLY. http://NovasAreForever.org But other than Bruce Ray, are there any other folks here on this forum who may have had any IRIS programming, either on the Point 4, or another system of similarity in the late '70s to early '80s? I've hunted down a handful of people so far on LinkedIn and scouring the internet, and only a few of those have responded. But I just thought I'd make a shout out here. A small handful have kindly responded, with either limited recollection or availability, or both. In addition to Bruce, those who have contributed so far include David Takle, and one of the original Point 4 IRIS designers, Dan Paymar. We've added a LOT of new content and progress to our restoration/re-creation of what is turning out to be TWO distinct Point 4 IRIS systems. Stop by our site if you like, and especially review the directory page "Understranding IRIS": http://microtechm1.blogspot.com/p/understanding-iris.html Does anyone here have anything to add, or IRIS/Point 4 documentation that could be helpful here (other than what we have at http://microtechm1.blogspot.com/p/manuals.html ). Thanks all, I always appreciate the fantastic feedback here. -AJ http://MightyFrame.com http://MicrotechM1.blogspot.com

9 years, 9 months

2
2
0 0

CDC 9429 Floppy maintenance manual

by lists＠loomcom.com

I don't suppose anyone has a copy of the CDC 9429 floppy drive maintenance manual they'd be willing to scan for me? I have reason to believe that the CDC 9428 and 9429 are identical except that the 9429 is jumpered for 80 tracks and the 9428 is jumpered for 40 tracks... but I'm not 100% sure. I do have a copy of the 9428 maintenance manual, thanks to Bitsavers, but having the 9429 manual would put my mind at ease lest I follow the alignment procedures from the 9428 manual and screw something up. -Seth -- Seth Morabito seth at loomcom.com

9 years, 9 months

7
13
0 0

Decmate 2 error codes

by pdaguytom＠gmail.com

Just picked up a Decmate 2 and have managed to get a monitor, keyboard and boot disk (I think) setup for it, but when I attempt to boot it, I'm getting alternating error codes 17 and 19(on different boot attempts). I've searched and found some of the startup error codes but not these particular ones. Anyone know where I could find such a list? Thanks, Tom

9 years, 9 months

1
0
0 0

Facit 4070 to PC interface

by chd＠chdickman.com

Has anyone ever worked up a PC parallel port to Facit 4070 paper tape punch interface? I found one on a Swedish website. The punch parallel input looks like it is TTL compatible, but I can't find anything in the documentation that describes the input voltage specifications. Chuck

9 years, 9 months

6
5
0 0

CMU-CS-78-104

by aek＠bitsavers.org

Came across this in some stuff I got last week and thought it was pretty interesting http://bitsavers.org/pdf/cmu/cs-tr/CMU-CS-78-104_Impact_of_Implementation_D…

9 years, 9 months

1
0
0 0

HP breakup... Website & ftp being trashed ... save what you can

by swiftgriggs＠gmail.com

If you care, you might want to check out: ftp://ftp.hp.com:/pub/alphaserver/firmware I'm always updating firmware on older alphas and I've noticed this site has undergone some changes lately. I've also noticed that HP's web sites have been absolutely trashed for a couple of years now. However, now many alpha related searches return 0 results on most of their portals. When you do find something, it's often a dead link. Many of the Tru64 pages are all a broken link, broken CSS, shambles. Anyhow, my trust in HP is at an all-time-low (more than I even knew was possible after I got my whopping $26 dollar settlement for them ripping folks off on ink cartridges and getting class-action-sued for it). Unsurprisingly, they can't even run a website anymore, and even the FTP site seems to be feeling the shake up (directories moving around, things obviously undergoing some major changes). So, you might want to grab whatever you need off the post-Fiorina walking corpse of HP before they go full zombie and eat their own brains and lose everything. There are patches, firmware etc... many things their management would probably remove if they were literate enough to know they still had them online in an undamaged form (folks so often forget about FTP). -Swift

9 years, 9 months

6
9
0 0

PDP-11/05 microcode dump?

by jnc＠mercury.lcs.mit.edu

> From: Mattis Lind > I'll check all PROM chips on both board sets tomorrow. Check out the Computer History wiki Web page first; I looked at a couple of boards, and added all the chip types I could find. DEC used a vast variety, it seems! Noel

9 years, 9 months

1
0
0 0

PDP-11/05 microcode dump?

by jnc＠mercury.lcs.mit.edu

> From: Mattis Lind > What about compatibility between different revisions? I.e. Is it > possible to mix DataParh board and Control board from different > revisions with different microcode? Well, I don't recall seeing any mention of compatability in the manuals, but that is not definitive either way. I had a look at the two versions of the data path board, and it seems to me that they are basically identical in their interface and function, so that either version would work with any control board version. I looked at the interconnects with i) the other CPU board (on the C-F connectors), and ii) the front console (through the Berg connector), and as far as I can see, both boards use the same interconnects. I didn't track down every last pin, and check them all, but I checked many, many pins, and all the ones I checked were the same. The two versions don't seem that different, internally. The PROMs are the same on the two versions of the data path board, for what that's worth - which is probably not that much. (The PROMs on the data path board don't contain any microcode at all; that's all on the control board.) One major difference is that the register file chips on the older board (which have tri-state outputs, and use that to do a mux) have been replaced by different register file chips, and real mux chips; however, the two versions should work identically. There are differences in the area of the serial line clock, but those should be immaterial. There are some other minor differences, but again, it seems like they should also work identically. So, that's the source of my conclusion that the two versions of the data path card are functionally identical, and can be interchanged. Noel

9 years, 10 months

1
0
0 0

PDP-11/05 microcode dump?

by jnc＠mercury.lcs.mit.edu

> From: Steven Malikoff > I was lucky to find an original 11/05 print set dated 1973. For what > it's worth, the microcode listing in my doc is Revision B Do note that a lot of the PROMs on those boards aren't actually 'microcode', and aren't covered in that listing. For instance, on the M7261 (control) board, there are 7 which aren't 'microcode' (list drawn from the 11/05 article on the Computer History wiki): A01A2 = E12 = Bus Request -> Grant processing A02A2 = E30 = Internal address decode (first stage) A07A1 = E68 = Internal address decode (second stage) A09A1 = E69 = Internal address decode (second stage) A09A2 = E101 = Branch utest service A13A1 = E90 = Internal interrupt acknowledge A14A1* = E100 = Console switch control and 10 which are: A04A2 = E92 = Next instruction (high bits) A05A2 = E93 = Processor Status Word control A07A2* = E95 = Bus control A10A2 = E103 = Next instruction (low bits) A11A2 = E104 = ALU operation select A12A2 = E105 = Branch utest A13A2 = E106 = Multiplexor control A14A2 = E107 = Bus control A15A2 = E94 = ALU control A16A2 = E96 = Miscellaneous And I haven't included the 11 PROM chips on the M7260 (Data paths) board, none of which are 'microcode'. So those 'microcode' listings only cover about 1/3 of the PROM chips in the CPU; so one can't use just the microcode revision level to tell you what's what. E.g there are two chips different between the C and E etch levels of the M7261: A07A2 and A14A1 (marked with a '*' above); one is 'microcode', one isn't. BTW, when you say that the microcode listings in your 1973 print set are "Revision B", are you referring to the "Microprogram Flow", "Microprogram Symbolic Listing", or "Microprogram Binary Listing", because they can be at different revision levels (given in the box in the extreme lower right corner)? E.g. the ones in the KD11-B prints in the GT40 print set (dated February 1973) are 'B', 'C' and 'C', respectively; the hard-copy set I have (not dated explicitly, but apparently mid-1972, given the modification date on the 'Index' sheet) has 'B', 'B' and 'B'. > it is *exactly* the same printout as in the the Bitsavers doc Revision > C You mean the July 1976 set, the ones with microcode revision levels (as above) of 'C', 'E', and 'E', right? That is M7261 etch revision 'F', which uses quite a few different PROM chips >from the earlier ones, so I'd be fairly surprised if the microcode was actually identical. I think you'd have to look at every bit to be sure; the data on which chips changed, here: http://gunkies.org/wiki/PDP-11/05#Control_PROMs would allow anyone who wanted to actually do that to focus in on specific columns of the microprogram to look for differences. (In fact, the 'F' etch rev has one less PROM chip than the 'E' etch rev, but I suspect - i.e. I haven't checked the exact function of each chip on those etch levels - that it's not a micro-program chip, though: there's one less 32x8 PROM chip, and those are generally used for control functions, the microprogram chips are all 256x4.) Noel

9 years, 10 months

2
1
0 0

Interfacing with HP-HIL

by cmhanson＠eschatologist.net

Has anyone used any modern hardware to interface with HP-HIL gear? (HIL is Human Interface Link, not to be confused with HP-IL.) I?d like to interface an HP 46085A Control Dial Box <http://www.hpmuseum.net/display_item.php?hw=684> with my Mac via USB. But before I go any further in this?I?ve already put a bunch of effort into trying to get it to work?I realized I should probably ask here to see if anyone else has done it. Has anyone? HP-HIL uses what *should* be a pretty basic serial protocol with available docs. (Thanks, Bitsavers!) The only odd things about it are (1) a data rate of 100Kbps (rather than say 115Kbps) and (2) the use of 12/O/1 framing (rather than say two 8/E/1 frames per packet and (3) a 12V supply line for what?s otherwise a TTL-compatible bus. Getting the actual host interface IC is just about impossible without removing it from existing equipment, and the client interface IC doesn?t really seem like it would act as a host. The weird framing means virtually no common UART will work, and the data rate means something like an Arduino only has 160 cycles/bit to work with. It looks like I might be looking at either using either an Arduino or a CPLD to implement a 12/O/1 UART to talk to the control dial box, and using a second Arduino to communicate with that (via a parallel interface) to actually implement the USB HID via the builtin HID stack functionality on some models of Arduino. -- Chris

9 years, 10 months

7
12
0 0

When did Memory- and IO Protection Emerge (Esp. in Minis)?

by erik＠baigar.de

Dear Experts, during discussing the Rolms I came accross the following question: What was the first (Minicomputer) architecture which offered memory- and IO protection? I'd define the minimum requirements as: - Existence of a superuser mode (Rolm calls this Executive mode) - Existence of a user mode (With at least two users, Rolm offers 4) - In superuser mode, IO and memory protection for each user can be set up individually. - Any access violation is trapped and handeled by superuser code. - Of course commands for mode switching and setting up the memory and IO ranges must exist. I have got a real machine (Rolm 1602) having this implemented and dating from 1975. A document on this "Access Protection Module" as Rolm calls it also is dated 1975. It consists of a microcode module which realizes an extension of the 16 bit Nova instruction set and an additinoal CPU module, taking care of the new modes and supervising the IO- and memory accesses. My question is not regarding virtual memory memory, but regarding protection (IO and memory) to ensure capsulation of indivitual processes - not necessarily for multi user environments but e.g. for safety critical applications... Probably OS/2 in 1987 was one of the first home computer OSes to support memory protection (how about IO protection?), BSD on some Digital PDP-* was earlier (1977?) but still after the 1602. Any hints out there on other "Mini" architectures of that era having someting similar? Erik.

9 years, 10 months

19
50
0 0

PDP-11/05 microcode dump?

by jnc＠mercury.lcs.mit.edu

> From: Mattis Lind > Now I am convinced that if I program a new A04A2 PROM the machine > should behave much better. Indeed! I have annotated the PROM tables on the Computer History wiki page with the function of each, and that PROM is the high part of the 'next microinstruction' field, so if it's bad, the computer will be acting very strangely indeed! :-) > The failing chip was yet another NS chip in plastic Can you see the type? I'd like to add to the page lists of all the alternate chip types DEC used in place of the Intersil chips specified in the drawings. >> the 'F' etch rev has one less PROM chip than the 'E' etch rev, but I >> suspect .. that it's not a micro-program chip, though My guess was correct; the missing chip is the one I called "Internal interrupt acknowledge"; it was replaced with a 74154 4->16 demux. Noel

9 years, 10 months

2
1
0 0

Free to a Good Home - VAX 4000-105A in the UK

by robert.jarratt＠ntlworld.com

This one has a failed BCACHE, but I am told it will still boot and run VMS, albeit slowly. I have not tried this myself, but I have verified that it boots to the console. It is in a BA42B enclosure (i.e. desktop not rackmount). Is there any interest or should I just take out the bits I want from it and then throw it away? It is in Manchester, UK. I do occasionally travel to the East Midlands and to the Reading area though. Not keen on shipping it, but will do so if it means not throwing it away. The machine is free, any shipping would have to be paid for of course. Regards Rob

9 years, 10 months

2
3
0 0

AlphaStation 200 NVRAM Problem

by robert.jarratt＠ntlworld.com

I want to read the DROM chip with my programmer, but I can't ID the chip. Does anyone know what kind it is? It is in a PLCC32 package and the label on it is: 369E7 AYOMA 49/95 I am sure at least some of that is DEC stuff, unrelated to the type of chip. However, none of those parts of the label seem to correspond to any EPROM I can find. My programmer's software has an auto detect feature, but that also failed to ID the chip. I don't really want to remove the label if I can avoid it. The underside is marked 76394-23 Singapore C4 522 (might be 322) 512X None of these appear to match anything either. Any ideas what it might be? Thanks Rob

9 years, 10 months

3
11
0 0

PDP-11/05 microcode dump?

by jnc＠mercury.lcs.mit.edu

> From: Mattis Lind > Has anyone dumped the microcode of the PDP-11/05? > ... > When tracing the microprogram flow it looks very suspicious. Comparing > the same sequence with a better working pair reveal a few differences. > All these can be narrowed down to one single PROM chip. Josh had an 11/05 that had a uROM fail, and he had to blow a new one (IIRC he sent in a report, it's in the list archive). I'm not sure if it's the same one as the one you need, but if his post doesn't give the chip ID, no doubt he can let us know. > There are microcode listings in the manual but they need to be treated > to get into a dump. Which is exactly what Josh did. Speaking of which, is there any chance we can get those machine-readable listings online? I can host them with my other DEC material, and I can also put them in the Computer History wiki. Noel

9 years, 10 months

5
5
0 0

Facit 4070 to PC interface

by tsw-cc＠johana.com

Request for information about a Facit 4070. Yes, it can be hooked up to a parallel port interface. It takes a single 74LS00 chip to generate the proper signals, and the ACK signals. I did it in a simple jumper wire block (it has a male and female connector along with a jumper field. At the moment I have lost my documentation, but I have a working unit ready to be dissected to produce the proper diagram (it may take a while). I have connected it to a "real" and a USB parallel port and used direct writes to the parallel port device under Linux with no modification. Also if you are interested, I have a program that sends out block letters to be punched on the tape (along with leader). The letters are 5x7 and the 8th is the descender for lower case letters. The various docs for the 4070 are on Bitsavers, and you want to be sure that the "option" board just has jumpers on it (as it comes from the factory).

9 years, 10 months

3
2
0 0

Memory and I/O protection on the 940

by mark.kahrs＠gmail.com

Al mentioned the 940 so I thought I would fill in the details: Lichtenberger and Pirtle extended the hardware to include a page map: 14 bits of VA was divided into 3 bits of page # and 11 bits of offset. The 8 pages were held in 2 x 24 bit words divided into a 8 x 6 bit page numbers. The high order bit of the mapped page number served as the Read Only bit. This meant that "subsystems" (a.k.a. applications) could be shared between users. Additionally, the instruction set was protected against users with specific prohibition against using the I/O instructions. This was described in FJCC 1965 with modifications done in 1964.

9 years, 10 months

4
3
0 0

PDP-11/05 microcode dump?

by jnc＠mercury.lcs.mit.edu

> From: William Degnan >> I would need a dump of .. at least A04A2 / E102 on the Control board. > Can you clarify? Is this a typo? No, there are two different major versions of the M7261 Control board; see http://gunkies.org/wiki/PDP-11/05#CPU_board_versions A04A2 is inded E102 on the later major version of the board; on the earlier version (prints for that version are in the GT40 prints online, pg. 162 and on) A04A2 is E92. Speaking of the two major versions, though, I wonder if the ucode in the two versions is identical? The uROM chip numbers should give it, (if they are the same on both versions, albeit in different locations on the board), but I have yet to check. Does anyone happen to know? Noel

9 years, 10 months

2
1
0 0

Pics of a FASTRAND and other fun things.

by pontus＠Update.UU.SE

Hi I follow a facebook group of Swedes mainly interrested in micros of the 80:ies. While that is fun in it's own right I recently decided to ask what "heavy iron", if any, the members might possess. I was pleasantly surprised of what surfaced. I though that some of you might also enjoy this, so here is the pick of the litter (reproduced with permission). A GE/PAC 4060 Drum memory, from person A: http://www.update.uu.se/~pontus/slask/fb_comphist/ge_pac_4060_drum_1.jpg http://www.update.uu.se/~pontus/slask/fb_comphist/ge_pac_4060_drum_2.jpg Univac artefacts, from person B: http://www.update.uu.se/~pontus/slask/fb_comphist/FASTRAND_III.jpg http://www.update.uu.se/~pontus/slask/fb_comphist/FASTRAND_III_2.jpg http://www.update.uu.se/~pontus/slask/fb_comphist/FASTRAND_III_3.jpg http://www.update.uu.se/~pontus/slask/fb_comphist/1701_memory.jpg http://www.update.uu.se/~pontus/slask/fb_comphist/saab_univac_poster.jpg The following is the teletype that I believe must come from a UNIVAC 418 or 1106 console desk. It looks like a model 28. Can anyone confirm? http://www.update.uu.se/~pontus/slask/fb_comphist/teletypeXX.jpg http://www.update.uu.se/~pontus/slask/fb_comphist/418-II.jpg DIAB racks from person C, probably only interesting for Swedish unix buffs. DIAB machines are somewhat uncommon and the rack versions even more so. http://www.update.uu.se/~pontus/slask/fb_comphist/diab_racks.jpg Have a nice weekend, Pontus.

9 years, 10 months

4
3
0 0

The Radio Boys and Girls: Radio, Telegraph, Telephone and Wireless Adventures f

by COURYHOUSE＠aol.com

Before there were books of kids doing thins with computers there was: The Radio Boys and Girls: Radio, Telegraph, Telephone and Wireless Adventures for Juvenile Readers, 1890-1945 - A View Though Literature By Mike Adams A Review By Ed Sharpe Director and Lead Archivist for Southwest Museum of Engineering Communications and Computation Glendale Daily Planet / KKAT-IPTV Read At http://glendaledailyplanet.com/the-radio-boys-and-girls-radio-telegraph-tele phone-and-wireless-adventu-p570-154.htm

9 years, 10 months

1
0
0 0

PDP-11/05 microcode dump?

by mattislind＠gmail.com

Has anyone dumped the microcode of the PDP-11/05? I am looking into a CPU board pair that are not behaving that well. The only switch that does anything is the START switch. The rest is doing nothing. The CPU clock is stopped. When tracing the microprogram flow it looks very suspicious. Comparing the same sequence with a better working pair reveal a few differences. All these can be narrowed down to one single PROM chip. It doesn't look like it is something else that is wire-ored onto the micor address bus since the enable signals for all those are inactive. And one signal is already low so wire-ORing would not change it. I would need a dump of the chips or at least A04A2 / E102 on the Control board. There are microcode listings in the manual but they need to be treated to get into a dump. So if someone already have a dump that would be highly appreciated. /Mattis

9 years, 10 months

1
0
0 0

FidoNet ....show [was: History [was Re: strangest systems I've sent email...

by COURYHOUSE＠aol.com

fido news when he became editor and they are lamenting the Internet taking away from fido net.... https://gopherproxy.meulie.net/gopher.meulie.net/0/fidonews/2002/fido1902.nw s In a message dated 4/30/2016 7:43:59 P.M. Mountain Standard Time, geneb at deltasoft.com writes: On Sun, 1 May 2016, Tomasz Rola wrote: > On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 10:07:34AM -0700, geneb wrote: >> On Wed, 27 Apr 2016, Sean Conner wrote: >> > [...] >>> Just look into the political machinations of what was known as FidoNet to >>> see how this could end up. >>> >> What IS known as FidoNet (1:138/142 here. :) ) and it's still a >> political shit-show, mostly due to people from Zone 2. *sigh* > > Pardon my ignorant question but is there a place on the net where I > could read some more about it? Or maybe it is short enough to explain > here? > Books could be written about it unfortunately, One of the more annoying aspects is Bjorn Felten, the current editor of FidoNews - he's refused repeated requests to pass on his editor duties for various reasons and he's refused - for at least the last 10 years. Find a telnetable BBS that's a member of FidoNet and start reading the FidoNews echo for a taste of the insanity. The Fido Sysop (FNSYSOP) is also a pretty deranged place. g. -- Proud owner of F-15C 80-0007 http://www.f15sim.com - The only one of its kind. http://www.diy-cockpits.org/coll - Go Collimated or Go Home. Some people collect things for a hobby. Geeks collect hobbies. ScarletDME - The red hot Data Management Environment A Multi-Value database for the masses, not the classes. http://scarlet.deltasoft.com - Get it _today_!

9 years, 10 months

4
5
0 0

_Processor_ magazine/newsprint?

by tshoppa＠wmata.com

Are there any archived issues of _Processor_ from the 80's or early 90's, online anywhere? I seem to recall it went through at least one major printing format change (from newsprint to cheap bound magazine or the other way around). It sometimes had articles but was mostly ads from second-hand minicomputer vendors. Most of what I remember was DEC-aftermarket of course, but there was also overlap with DG, IBM aftermarket, various office machines, and later PC-clones and Sun stuff.

9 years, 10 months

4
4
0 0

Release Notes for version 6.5 of TSX-Plus...

by lbickley＠bickleywest.com

I just received from S&H a PDF copy of the TSX 6.50 Release Notes - and Jay has posted it to the http://tsxplus.classiccmp.org website. Lots of interesting/helpful information for all you TSX-Plus buffs... Cheers, Lyle -- 73 AF6WS Bickley Consulting West Inc. http://bickleywest.com "Black holes are where God is dividing by zero"

9 years, 10 months

2
1
0 0

TEMPEST protection (was Rolm Computers: 1602, 1602A, 1602B, 1666, MSExx)

by jnc＠mercury.lcs.mit.edu

> From: Erik Baigar > very interesting reading If you want to see a great example of why it was important, check out the so-called 'Berlin Tunnel': https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Gold http://www.fas.org/irp/cia/product/tunnel-200702.pdf Some of the traffic that was intercepted was teletype traffic - which had been encrypted. However, the equipment that connected the gear to the line allowed a tiny electronic whisper of the original plain-text onto the line, along with the encrypted form, and it was possible to read the plaintext off the line with suitable gear. Noel

9 years, 10 months

6
7
0 0

Rolm Computers: 1602, 1602A, 1602B, 1666, MSExx (was Data General Nova Star Trek)

by jnc＠mercury.lcs.mit.edu

> From: Erik Baigar >> as was coming up with something that could be both EMP-survivable and >> TEMPEST-worthy. > TEMPEST? A set of standards for allowed levels of emissions (in particular, electro-magnetic radiation) from communication/computing gear, intended to prevent listening to the activity of that gear: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tempest_(codename) Noel

9 years, 10 months

3
3
0 0

AW: When did Memory- and IO Protection Emerge (Esp. in Minis)?

by radiotest＠juno.com

At 11:24 PM 5/4/2016, Andy Holt wrote: >Could someone with access to the OED please check up the first use of the term "minicomputer" I am not the OED, but when I first saw the TX-0 and the PDP-1 at MIT in late 1964 or early 1965 I believe that I heard the term minicomputer applied to them. Certainly when I next saw them in the summer of 1967 both were being called minicomputers by the staff there. Dale H. Cook, Roanoke/Lynchburg, VA Osborne 1 / Kaypro 4-84 / Kaypro 1 / Amstrad PPC-640 http://plymouthcolony.net/starcity/radios/index.html

9 years, 10 months

1
0
0 0

Data General Nova Star Trek (Rockwell Collins vs. Vaisala SPT11A)

by jnc＠mercury.lcs.mit.edu

> From: Erik Baigar > I wanted to have a computer using core memory and so I bought a black > box from the Tornado aircraft which contained core. This started a 10 > year yourney of analyzing it, decyphering the command set and building > tools to program it. ... I have a project page on this: > http://www.baigar.de/TornadoComputerUnit/index.html I am absolutely, completely, blown away. This has got to be one of the most amazing projects I have ever come across. I'm utterly awed by the work you did to reverse engineer this thing. Everyone should check out this site - especially the detailed time-line Noel

9 years, 10 months

12
36
0 0

Firming up rubber? (was: Cleaning rubber goo)

by tlindner＠macmess.org

On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 10:14 AM, Mike Stein <mhs.stein at gmail.com> wrote: > What's the best commonly available solvent for cleaning the rubber goo that used to be pressure > rollers, belts, feet etc.? On a similar note, does any have a solution to firm up rubber that is just starting to gooify? I have some joystick feet that are just starting to get sticky. -- -- tim lindner "Proper User Policy apparently means Simon Says."

9 years, 10 months

5
4
0 0

tsx-plus wikipedia article

by jwest＠classiccmp.org

I was skimming the Wikipedia article for tsx-plus, some of it seemed off to me. Anyone know the facts for sure? 1) They suggest tsxplus generally didn't support more than 8 users well. At my high school, we had 16 users on it constantly and it seemed to perform very well. Anyone have experience along those lines? 2) They say LEX-11 (wordprocessing) was included. I don't believe so. 3) They say a spreadsheet program from Saturn Software was included. I don't think so. Saturn had a wordprocessor, but it was a chargeable product and I don't think S&H distributed it. 4) They say the latest version of TSX-Plus has TCP/IP support. That's not true, at least not built in. There was a TCP/IP stack done by a 3rd party (actually, think it was a person that ported one and put it in a public contributed library) but that wasn't "included" by S&H. Do I have those things wrong? J

9 years, 10 months

5
5
0 0

Steve Dompier's coding...

by pete＠petelancashire.com

Reminds me of a challenge I had in the early 80's The place I worked made IC test and evaluation systems, starting price in 1980 was around $300K and many where close to $1.5 million. This one was for IBM. They were designing a 288K bit ram and one thing they wanted was to be able to 'see' failed bits as parameters such as supply voltage were changed. If you looked at the die it was 9 'squares' of i think 128 x 256 ( i think that was the size) cell or bits. The 9 th was for parity. The memory was read by the system and a 0 or 1 was stored in a buffer in the system. The system was run by a PDP11/44 the display was a Tektronix GMA125 with option 42/43. The GMA 125 was the OEM display used in the 4116, a 25" DVST terminal. Option 42/43 was feed from a DR11. The 42/43 could be driven in Tek 401x format (that's the same you still see today when you put your X11 display into Tek mode) which had a point plotting set of commands. So one had to read in a loop this external memory which came back in some long forgotten 16 bits per something mode, calculate the position of the 'bit' which was in memory block x and position x and y in each block and either display a dot or plus or something at the respective location on the CRT. Doing it all in some time IBM wanted it done in .. loops within loops within loops and finally a test for 1 or 0 and out the DR11W. The only way I could get the code to meet IBM speed requirement was to do the unthinkable. Upon start the inner most work that was test for 'display if zero' or display if one' was modified to be branch of true or branch if false. Sometimes you just have to violate all the rules. Other fun things were using shifting bits and using indexing for some of the coordinate translations. oh well when every instruction time made a difference. it was challenging but fun -pete On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 9:56 AM, Bill Sudbrink <wh.sudbrink at verizon.net> wrote: > I took a peek at the access logs for the Cromemco Dazzler > files that I recently put up on my web server. I'm > gratified to see that a lot of people are taking advantage > of the availability of these documents, that have not > recently (if ever) been easily available on the web. I > also see that a lot of people took the Dazzlemation HEX > file and the Magenta Martini paper tape image, presumably > to run on Udo Monk's great Windows Cromemco Z1 simulator. > > Also, thanks to everyone that generated pdf files for me! > > One thing I noticed is that not many people looked at the > disassembly of Dazzlemation. If you are an 8080 or Z80 > programmer (or any 8-bitter for that matter) I really > recommend that you take a look, it's a real treat. I'm > reliably informed that Mr. Dompier hand wrote that program > LITERALLY (hand, pencil, paper), no editor, no assembler. > He then toggled it in (or maybe raw keyed it in with a > primitive ROM monitor) and went through a few iterations of: > > 1) store to paper tape > 2) modify in memory > 3) test > 4) go to 1 > > It's neat to see some of the "tricks" he used and also the > level of sophistication of the code. It does a lot of > stuff in not a lot of bytes. Also, here and there, in > "dead" areas, you can also see the debris of ideas that he > started and then abandoned. > > Bill S. > > >

9 years, 10 months

1
0
0 0

Steve Dompier's coding...

by wh.sudbrink＠verizon.net

I took a peek at the access logs for the Cromemco Dazzler files that I recently put up on my web server. I'm gratified to see that a lot of people are taking advantage of the availability of these documents, that have not recently (if ever) been easily available on the web. I also see that a lot of people took the Dazzlemation HEX file and the Magenta Martini paper tape image, presumably to run on Udo Monk's great Windows Cromemco Z1 simulator. Also, thanks to everyone that generated pdf files for me! One thing I noticed is that not many people looked at the disassembly of Dazzlemation. If you are an 8080 or Z80 programmer (or any 8-bitter for that matter) I really recommend that you take a look, it's a real treat. I'm reliably informed that Mr. Dompier hand wrote that program LITERALLY (hand, pencil, paper), no editor, no assembler. He then toggled it in (or maybe raw keyed it in with a primitive ROM monitor) and went through a few iterations of: 1) store to paper tape 2) modify in memory 3) test 4) go to 1 It's neat to see some of the "tricks" he used and also the level of sophistication of the code. It does a lot of stuff in not a lot of bytes. Also, here and there, in "dead" areas, you can also see the debris of ideas that he started and then abandoned. Bill S.

9 years, 10 months

1
0
0 0

Titlers, Switchers, Paintboxes, Paint Apps and Old Broadcast Equipment

by swiftgriggs＠gmail.com

Back in the early 90's I remember that many times I'd see a print advertisement for a Video Toaster or a new genlock card, they'd say things like "features you'd have to pay thousands for in a professional paintbox or titler!" I always wondered what they were talking about, since I'd never seen how broadcast was done back then (and still don't know). So, I'm really talking about the tech of the 80's (since that's what the marketing folks were referring to, I assume). Here's what I could find that I'm speculating were the "competition" of the time: The Quantel Paintbox: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantel_Paintbox Superpaint running on a DG Nova 800 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superpaint The Bosch FGS 4000 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9oyGaEu7D7s These are about the only ones I could find. Does anyone know of any others? Also, here are my favorite paint and 2D animation programs of yore. If you guys have others that you loved and remember, what were they? DOS 1. Deluxe Paint II Enhanced 2. PC Paintbrush 3. Autodesk Animator 4. Paul Mace's GRASP 5. Deluxe Paint Animation Amiga 1. Photogenics 2. Photon Paint 3. TVPaint 4. Brilliance 5. Disney Animation Studio Sorry, I didn't use the Mac enough to form any favorites, though I did love Fractal Design Painter (now Corel Painter). -Swift

9 years, 10 months

7
15
0 0

Ideas for running a VB4 application on modern hardware?

by mark＠markesystems.com

> I have a Visual Basic 4 application that I need to run on modern 64-bit > hardware I can do this in a VM, but I really need this VM to be wicked > small, like under a gig. The smallest XP VM I?ve seen is 600MB (which > might > be good) but XP is becoming very hard to source these days. VB4 was a bridge between 16-bit Windows 3.1 applications and 32-bit everything later (such as the DOS-based Win-95, -98, and -ME, and all of the NT-based operating systems, which is everything else through Win-10 64-bit). As such, the package included both a 16-bit an 32-bit compiler. If your application was compiled using the 16-bit version, you're pretty much stuck with XP-32 or earlier (in a VM, if necessary), as it will automatically spawn a 16-bit virtual environment (ntvdm.exe) to run the 16-bit applications. Win7 and beyond, and all 64-bit versions, do not support this feature (I supported a VB3 application for 20 years; Win7 was what finally broke it for good.) If it was compiled to 32-bit, then you should be pretty much good to go; you may run into a few insurmountable problems with some now unsupported OCX's. Other than those, all of the 32-bit code should run fine on anything current. If you have the source, you're also in pretty good shape. VB4 is very easy to port to VB6; there were almost no backward-incompatible features of the later Visual Basic classic languages. Find an old copy of VB6 SP6, re-compile it (perhaps replacing some of the failed OCXs with others that will work - a common one was DBGrid, which is quite easy to replace with FlexGrid), and you're golden. I currently support just such an application, and although the development environment requires a couple of tricks to get working smoothly, the compiled application works just fine on Win10-64. Drop me a note off-line if you'd like any additional or more specific help with this; I have a reasonable amount of experience with just this problem. Of course, there are always older versions of Wine... ~~ Mark Moulding

9 years, 10 months

9
21
0 0

center tapped power transformer help needed

by brain＠jbrain.com

Anyone here do any transformer specification or design and would be interested in some consulting dollars to help me source/create a weird transformer option? What I need is a 12V primary, 12V:12V center tapped secondary that can support 12VA of power. Higher voltages are OK, but not needed. I am struggling on the Xformer details, but I know it needs to be center tapped, 1:1:1 @12VA Jim -- Jim Brain brain at jbrain.com www.jbrain.com

9 years, 10 months

4
4
0 0

Nice LAB11 brochure.

by mattislind＠gmail.com

Yet another nice color brochure. https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/96935524/Datormusuem/lab11.pdf Has anyone seen a VR20 in real? Rather interesting to be able to do a red and green X/Y screen based on different energy levels. Someone care to explain how that works? If I read the fine print on the back correctly (and comparing with the others) I would guess that this brochure is from 1971.

9 years, 10 months

9
14
0 0

Fwd: RSTS and slow DECnet operation in SIMH

by paulkoning＠comcast.net

For those of you running DECnet/E on simulators... paul > Begin forwarded message: > > From: Paul Koning <paulkoning at comcast.net> > Subject: Re: RSTS and slow DECnet operation in SIMH > Date: May 2, 2016 at 1:37:45 PM EDT > To: SIMH <simh at trailing-edge.com> > >> >> On Apr 19, 2016, at 2:46 PM, Paul Koning <paulkoning at comcast.net> wrote: >> >> With help from Mark Pizzolato, I've been looking at why RSTS (DECnet/E) operates so slowly when it's dealing with one way transfers. This is independent of protocol and datalink type; it shows up very clearly in NFT (any kind of file transfer or directory listing) and also in NET (Set Host). The symptom is that data comes across in fairly short bursts, separated by about a second of pause. >> >> This turns out to be an interaction between the DECnet/E queueing rules and the very fast operation of SIMH on modern hosts. DECnet/E will queue up to some small number of NSP segments for any given connection, set by the executor parameter "data transmit queue max". The default value is 4 or 5, but it can be set higher, and that helps some. >> >> The trouble is this: if you have a one way data flow, for example NFT or FAL doing a copy, the sending program simply fires off a sequence of send-packet operations until it gets a "queue full" reject from the kernel. At that point it delays, but the delay is one second since sleep operations have one second granularity. The other end acks all that data quite promptly, but since the emulation runs so fast, the whole transmit queue can fill up before the ack from the other end arrives, so the queue full condition occurs, then a one second delay, then the process starts over. >> >> This sort of thing doesn't happen on request/response exchanges; for example the NCP command LOOP NODE runs at top speed because traffic is going both ways. >> >> I tried fiddling with the data queue limit to see if increasing it would help. It seems to, but it's not sufficient. What does work is a larger queue limit (32 looks good) combined with CPU throttling to slow things down a bit. I used "set throttle 2000/1" (which produces a 1 ms delay every 2000 instructions, i.e., roughly 2 MIPS processing speed which is at the high end of what real PDP-11s can do). Those two changes combined make file transfer run smoothly and fast. >> >> Ideally DECnet/E should cancel the program sleep when the queue transitions from full to not-full, but that's not part of the existing logic (at least not unless the program explicitly asks for "link status notifications"). I could probably add that; the question is how large a change it is -- does it exceed what's feasible for a patch. I may still do that, but at least for now the above should be helpful. > > Followup: I created a patch that implements the "wake up when the queue goes not-full". Or more precisely, it wakes up the process whenever an ack is received; that covers the probem case and probably doesn't create many other wakeups since the program is unlikely to be sleeping otherwise. > > The attached patch script does the job. This is for RSTS V10.1. I will take a look at RSTS 9.6; the patch is unlikely to apply there (offsets probably don't match) but the concept will apply there too. I don't have other DECnet/E versions, let alone source listings which is what's needed to create the patch. > > With this patch, you can run at full emulation speed, with the default queue limit (5). In fact, I would recommend setting that limit; if you make the queue limit significantly larger, the patch doesn't help and things are still slow. I suspect that comes from overrunning the queue limits at the receiving end. (Note that DECnet/E leaves the flow control choice to the application, and most use "no" flow control, i.e., on/off only which isn't effective if the sender can overrun the buffer pool of the receiver.) > > To apply the patch, give it to ONLPAT and select the monitor SIL (just <CR> will give you the installed one). Or you can do it with the PATCH option at boot time, in that case enter the information manually. The manual will spell this out some more, I expect. > > I have no idea if this issue can appear on real PDP-11 systems. Possibly, if you have a fast CPU, a fast network (Ethernet) and enough latency to make the issue visible (more than a few milliseconds but way under a second). In any case, it's unlikely to hurt, and it clearly helps a great deal in emulated systems. > > paul >

9 years, 10 months

1
0
0 0

Cromemco Dazzler 40th birthday presents...

by fritz_chwolka＠t-online.de

Am 03.05.2016 um 04:06 schrieb Bill Sudbrink: > Check it out: > > http://wsudbrink.dyndns.org:8080/dazzler.html > > More to come. > > Bill S. > > > > Look at : http://oldcomputers.dyndns.org/public/pub/manuals/dazzler/index.html greetings

9 years, 10 months

2
1
0 0

Plan9 and Inferno (was Re: strangest systems I've sent email from)

by blstuart＠bellsouth.net

On Thu, 4/28/16, Liam Proven <lproven at gmail.com> wrote: >>> The efforts to fix and improve Unix -- Plan 9, Inferno -- forgotten. > > It is, true, but it's a sideline now. And the steps made by Inferno > seem to have had even less impact. I'd like to see the 2 merged back > into 1. Actually, it's best not to think of Inferno as a successor to Plan 9, but as an offshoot. The real story has more to do with Lucent internal dynamics than to do with attempting to develop a better research platform. Plan 9 has always been a good platform for research, and the fact that it's the most pleasant development environment I've ever used is a nice plus. However, Inferno was created to be a platform for products. The Inferno kernel was basically forked from the 2nd Edition Plan9 kernel, and naturally there are some places that differ from the current 4th Edition Plan 9 kernel. However, a number of the differences have been resolved over the years, and the same guy does most of the maintenance of the compiler suite that's used for native Inferno builds and for Plan 9. Although you usually can't just drop driver code from one kernel into the other, the differences are not so great as to make the port difficult. So both still exist and both still get some development as people who care decide to make changes, but they've never really been in a position to merge. And BTW, if you like the objectives of the Limbo language in Inferno, you'll find a lot of the ideas and lessons learned from it in Go. After all, Rob Pike and Ken Thompson were two of the main people behind Go and, of course, they had been at the labs, primarily working on Plan 9, before moving to Google. BLS

9 years, 10 months

2
1
0 0

Only slightly vintage

by lproven＠gmail.com

http://jalopnik.com/this-ancient-laptop-is-the-only-key-to-the-most-valuabl… -- Sent from my phone - please pardon brevity & typos.

9 years, 10 months

2
1
0 0

Cromemco Dazzler 40th birthday presents...

by wh.sudbrink＠verizon.net

Check it out: http://wsudbrink.dyndns.org:8080/dazzler.html More to come. Bill S.

9 years, 10 months

1
0
0 0

PDP8 MAINDEC ?

by anders＠abc80.net

>Date: Mon, 2 May 2016 12:37:43 +0200 >From: Mattis Lind <mattislind at gmail.com> >To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts" > <cctalk at classiccmp.org> >Subject: Re: PDP8 MAINDEC ? > Selling, trading, giving away. What ever works. Rather than the garbage > bin. I have no need for multiple copies. Just checking if someone like to > play with the real paper tapes. > When it comes to digital copies the plan is to check what is already online > and then scan / read those that aren't. But it is a long time plan since it > takes quite a while. Unless you feel like helping out... A page feed scanner and a couple of thousands of pages. > > /Mattis I can take good care of (some part of) it, a bit depending on which tapes and documents you have. /Anders

9 years, 10 months

1
0
0 0

PDP-8/e sales brochure

by jnc＠mercury.lcs.mit.edu

> From: Pontus Pihlgren > I wonder what the three leftmost cabinets contains. I don't recall what > peripherals have the blinkenlights at the top. RK05 and TU10 > controllers perhaps? I have a half-done page with images of all the 5-1/4 inch indicator panels (PDP-8, -11, -15); so I can identify the indicator panel on the right (above to the two DECTape drives), which is a TC08 DECTape controller (I have a large picture of one of those, for the page, and that's definitely it), which makes sense, given it's in the same cabinet as the DECTape drives. The other one, I have no idea - anyone? I'm pretty sure it's not an RK08. The RK08, like the RK11-C, was wired for an indicator panel, but like the TM08, it only used two rows of lights. (I've never seen an image of one: this is deduced from reading the engineering drawings.) The partial page is here: http://ana-3.lcs.mit.edu/~jnc/tech/DECIndicatorPanels.html if anyone is interested. Good images of the missing 5-1/4" indicator panels (which also include the RF11 and FP15, as well as the mythical RK11, which may not exist) gratefully accepted! Noel

9 years, 10 months

1
0
0 0

PDP-8/e sales brochure

by mattislind＠gmail.com

I found a really nice PDP-8/e sales brochure while browsing through our heaps of documentation. Plenty of nice close up photos and as last picture a system with everything. https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/96935524/Datormusuem/pdp8e-sales.pdf

9 years, 10 months

5
5
0 0

Parts for CDC CMD drive.

by mattislind＠gmail.com

http://bit.ly/23iTFO1 A couple of spindle motors, blower and some electronics. For the cost of shipping. /Mattis

9 years, 10 months

1
0
0 0

PDP8 MAINDEC ?

by mattislind＠gmail.com

We have quite a lot of PDP-8 MAINDEC which are duplicates even when taking different versions into account. This include the paper listing and the actual paper tape. Is there an interest in such tapes / documentation?

9 years, 10 months

3
4
0 0

MEM11A status update

by ggs＠shiresoft.com

Just to let folks know that I just received the prototype boards for the MEM11A (FedEx just left). The boards look great! The parts from Digikey arrived late last week, so once I get my soldering station set up (new microscope and new Metcal soldering iron) I?ll start to build a couple of boards to test out. Once I have a couple working *and* I get firm orders for at least 25 boards (hint, hint) I?ll do a production run. TTFN - Guy

9 years, 10 months

4
4
0 0

MEM11 update

by jnc＠mercury.lcs.mit.edu

> From: Guy Sotomayor > The reality is that an SPC board will be more expensive because of the > gold edge fingers. Oh, right, forgot about that. Yeah, six of one... > I was originally thinking that if I do have to split the board up, that > I'd make them completely independent. But that has the issue of > requiring 2x the number of UNIBUS transceiver parts (which are all but > unobtainium as of now). Actually, 8641's (at least) are still around for not much. See below. > some of the signals I'm running are pretty fast between the FPGA and > some of the other components ... I wouldn't want to run those signals > very far and certainly not across any sort of cabling. For sure. We've been having issues (although we think we have it licked now) with signals running across a flat cable between the prototype QSIC's mother-card (a QBUS wire-wrap card) and its daughter-card (an bought-in FPGA devel card), and that's for much slower signals (the only thing on the mother-card are QBUS transceivers and level converters). Of course, the fact that the interface doesn't put a ground wire between each pair signals wires doesn't help! :-) > From: Ethan Dicks > I'm starting to get sorry I sold off my surplus NS8641s from Software > Results 20 years ago. To be fair, I did get over $4 each for them, so at the > time, it was a good deal for me (ISTR retail was $7.50 even then, so I > got a good spread on the price). > I do have some left, but handfuls, not armloads. NS8641's are still available. I got a bunch from a guy in Hong Kong for US$1.50 each - considering the source, I built a test card to make sure they met specs, and they do, so I'm pretty sure they aren't counterfeits. :-) When I was worried he couldn't find enough, I checked with a supplier (4 Star Electronics, I think) and they had like 50K available, and quoted me a price in about the same region, so I don't think UNIBUS transceivers actually are a problem, at least, not at the moment. Noel

9 years, 10 months

3
2
0 0

File systems expert for a news article (urgent)

by alexmcwhirter＠triadic.us

Sounds like some of the SMR stuff Seagate is working on. Not sure if HAMR needs fs changes or not, but I know SMR does for certain. Sent from my T-Mobile 4G LTE Device -------- Original message -------- From: Eric Christopherson <echristopherson at gmail.com> Date: 5/1/2016 1:44 AM (GMT-05:00) To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts" <cctalk at classiccmp.org> Subject: Re: File systems expert for a news article (urgent) On Fri, Apr 29, 2016, Evan Koblentz wrote: > >>Anyone here on cctalk consider themselves a file systems expert and have > >>the credentials or job title to vouch for it? If so, then I need to > >>interview you ASAP today (in the next hour-ish) for a TechRepublic.com > >>article. Contact me offline: news at snarc.net. > >> > >>Not going to discuss the story itself here in public. > >> > > > >Can you be a little more specific?? File systems is quite broad > > > > One of the hard disk standards bodies is working on a new feature (which I'm > not going to post here) that would require changes to file systems, > otherwise the new feature is academic and useless in the real world. So I am > looking for someone with FS chops to comment on whether the changes can > reasonably happen. Cannot say more except in private. Hopefully not something that would require said filesystem implementators to pay licensing fees or sign NDAs or take affirmative action to limit users' use of data, or onerous things like that. -- ??????? Eric Christopherson

9 years, 10 months

2
1
0 0

Mini-RSTS

by COURYHOUSE＠aol.com

hilpert at cs.ubc.ca that is a valid idea.... or a replacement also for TSS-8 using pdp8s but would timeshare Ed Sharpe Archivist for SMECC In a message dated 5/1/2016 2:20:53 P.M. US Mountain Standard Time, hilpert at cs.ubc.ca writes: On 2016-May-01, at 1:55 PM, Paul Koning wrote: >> On May 1, 2016, at 4:37 PM, Warner Losh <imp at bsdimp.com> wrote: >> >> Cool brochure. When was this price list in force? > > Judging by what it advertises, probably 1972, maybe 1973. Unlikely to be later than that. I wonder if this MINI-RSTS/BASIC-PLUS was a marketing response to HP's timeshared BASIC system for the 2100s.

9 years, 10 months

1
0
0 0

Mini-RSTS

by mattislind＠gmail.com

Yet another nice DEC sales brochure from early seventies. This time DEC education MINI-RSTS-11. It mention PDP-11/21-CA! https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/96935524/Datormusuem/mini-rsts.pdf

9 years, 10 months

6
7
0 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

test-drb