> From: Tony Duell <ard(a)p850ug1.demon.co.uk>
<> >Any other AM29xx chips on it, like a 2909 or 2910 sequencer? Or is this
<> >just a demo board for a 4-bit ALU chip?
<> >
<> >It sounds like a really interesting find, though. The 29xx series chips
<> >were interesting devices that have been used in all sorts of machines.
<>
<>
<> Yep, there is a 2909 on board too....
<
<Ah, so there's a sequencer. And presumably, therefore, there's some kind
<of control store (ROM or RAM) on the output of that. So it sounds like
<it's a complete processor, albeit a small one.
How small depends on the microcode. It could easily be PDP8 or Nova
emulation with one 2901 though it would be slow. I've seen at one commercal
design that use it as a fast version of TMS1000 4bitter.
It's an interesting chip. I have a bunch of the raw 2901C and 2911 parts.
One day when I have time I'd like to try an extended wordlength PDP-8 like
machine using them. Say something obcenely long like 20 or 32bits. After
all working with that chip 8bits or 80 is as easy from the microcode
perspective. Besides it's the microcontroller that is the complex part.
Allison
>Anyone remember these? Are there copies?
<
<There was a Byte Press book "Threaded Interpreted Languages"
<from back then. I have it on the shelf at the office, if you
<want the ISBN number.
Thats it. The ISBN number is likely useless by now. The articles
were supposed to get you to a working language but I never saw them
all.
I've been thinking about languages and OSs and building one for myself
figuring what I'd seen back then may help. I'm still leaning toward OS/8
RTS-8 as models. Target cpu is of course z80. Though DEC T-11 would make
a good forth engine.
Allison
Still in need of a copy of the docs for an IBM/Lexmark 4033-001 token
ring printer server box. I have 5 units to add to a non-profit group's
network son and without them I'll likely be stabbing in the dark. Each
unit has it's own unique address on the label but I still need either
text, xerox, pdf, or something to go on. Any help is appreciated.
Russ Blakeman
IT Techie
Clarkson, KY
Hi,
After having so many people interested in the Cypher F880 op/maintenance
manual, I spent a couple of hours scanning it tonight (er...last night),
and put it online:
http://www.retrobytes.org/docs/cipher/
I indicated "most of them" in the subject because I haven't found a
satisfactory way to scan the engineering diagrams, which include
schematics and detailed breakdowns, yet. They are 11" x 17" and are very
finely detailed. My Ricoh IS430 will only scan that large at a max 400dpi,
which is still too coarse to show the details legibly (esp. the
schematics) and I think my solution is going to be to scan them in 2
letter-size pieces at 600dpi.
Also, in scanning the illustrated parts breakdown figures, many of which
are also 11" x 17", I scanned them as 2 8.5" 11" pages and included them
inline in the proper section. I have, however, also provided them
seperately in their original 11" x 17" form as well, you can't miss 'em.
I'll try to get the engineering figures up tomorrow; in the meantime, hope
this stuff helps someone!
Cheers,
Aaron
I have a MicroVAX 3100 on which I intend to install NetBSD and a 2000
with a trashed VMS installation.
Is there a way I can create a backup of the VMS installation on the 3100
which I can restore to the 2000, bearing in mind that it probably has a
much smaller hard disk?
--
Regards
Pete
> If anyone out there doesn't think sorting 1000 signed integers
>in 6.8 millisecs isn't fast, code it up on your PC and
>see how fast it is.
It depends a lot on the algorithm you use in the sort, of course :-).
I believe it's in _Numerical Recipes_ that possibly the worst sort
algorithm of all is disucssued: "Bogosort":
1. Take the list of numbers you want to sort.
2. Randomly reorganize them.
3. Check to see if they're sorted. If not, go back to step 2.
This is a Order(n*factorial(n)) algorithm. I've tried, but I've been
unable to come up with anything worse.
For your example of 1000 numbers, it'd take (assuming that each operation
takes a microsecond) about 10^2554 years to complete.
I think the only reason they discuss Bogosort is to emphasize that
just because Bubble Sort is the example used in lots of introductory
classes, that doesn't mean that you should ever actually use it for
anything :-). (Pre-RT-11 5.7 DIR/SORT notwithstanding, of course!)
--
Tim Shoppa Email: shoppa(a)trailing-edge.com
Trailing Edge Technology WWW: http://www.trailing-edge.com/
7328 Bradley Blvd Voice: 301-767-5917
Bethesda, MD, USA 20817 Fax: 301-767-5927
At 18:55 01-03-2000 -0500, Bear Stricklin wrote:
<snip>
>The drive is an Archive 5945L-2. What is the significance of this; how
>similar is it to other, older Archive QIC units, what interface did they
>use (it and a similar Archive QIC unit in one of my Convergent NGEN
<snip>
The 5945L series is, if I recall, QIC-02 interface. The local used PC
place near me has a couple of the old 'L' series with intact rollers. If
you'd like, I can see if I can snarf them (probably). They'd be yours for
shipping, pretty much.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Bruce Lane, Owner and head honcho, Blue Feather Technologies
http://www.bluefeathertech.com // E-mail: kyrrin(a)bluefeathertech.com
Amateur Radio: WD6EOS since Dec. '77
"Our science can only describe an object, event, or living thing in our
own human terms. It cannot, in any way, define any of them..."
In case there is anyone interested in such a machine, I just got
mail from someone who told me that he has seen a VAX6000 which is
otherwise going to be dismantled and discarded... but it is
in Brazil.
If anyone wants it, can afford to ship it, or lives closer to where
it is... contact the I&T people at 55212776000 (that's all I have).
I've asked the person who send me the info to send me anything further
info he can find out...
Megan Gentry
Former RT-11 Developer
+--------------------------------+-------------------------------------+
| Megan Gentry, EMT/B, PP-ASEL | Internet (work): gentry!zk3.dec.com |
| Unix Support Engineering Group | (home): mbg!world.std.com |
| Compaq Computer Corporation | addresses need '@' in place of '!' |
| 110 Spitbrook Rd. ZK03-2/T43 | URL: http://world.std.com/~mbg/ |
| Nashua, NH 03062 | "pdp-11 programmer - some assembler |
| (603) 884 1055 | required." - mbg |
+--------------------------------+-------------------------------------+
Howdy;
Last night I discovered with no small amount of chagrin that the rubber
capstan in the Symbolics' QIC drive had turned to proverbial goo.
Fortunately the Genera distribution tape I used to discover this is only
superficially damaged, since it's my only copy. That'll teach me. (:
Anyway, I hoped to take the capstan out of a newer Archive QIC and just
replace the whole assembly, but they are mechanically dissimilar just
enough so this won't work. Enough of the original rubber is gone that I
have no indication of what the original diameter of the capstan is.
The drive is an Archive 5945L-2. What is the significance of this; how
similar is it to other, older Archive QIC units, what interface did they
use (it and a similar Archive QIC unit in one of my Convergent NGEN
machines both use the same, 50-ish conductor IDC edge-connectors), and how
likely is it that this is a common drive?
I need to find out what the thickness of rubber in the capstan (and/or its
full outside diameter) is so I can begin considering how to repair this.
Thoughts, comments, musings? Tony, I think this might be just up your
alley. (:
ok
r.
<he provider, but they use AT&T for content and Sprint for the backbone. Wh
<I first got it, it was like having my own T1 for $40 per month. As they add
<more and more people, they began throttling the rates to fit more slots, an
<now limit uploads to 128K.
I've heard similar in this area. Also to get the bargan rate they want it
all and I'm not comforablt with them being the broker for phone, cable and
internet and they own little if any of the wire.
<You can't put a server on the line, several have tried and they've been kic
<off. They also forbid you to tunnel, although I occasionally do. Instead o
<tunneling through the $40 cable, they want you to buy @work, which is
Of course thats exactly what I'd want (or a IP masqurading router) and
also to hang my whole net here on it (vaxen, PCs and whatnot).
Allison
Hello, all:
I got one of these a few weeks ago, and I'm desperately trying to
get the pen working with Windows 95. I want to use it for an Ethernet-
tethered data sheet display terminal. I can call-up PDF-based
data sheets at my work bench, in stead of trying to locate my
paper files.
Anyway, I have Windows 95 running; acceptably, too. But no
matter what I do, I can't get Windows to recognize the TP digitizer.
I've downloaded various files from http://www.penwin.com/ but it's
still a no-go.
Has anyone done this before? I also understand that there are two
sister IBM ThinkPads, the 360C/CS/P/PE and the 750/755C/755CS.
What I need is a working machine to compare my installation to.
So close, but yet, so far...
Thanks.
Rich
[ Rich Cini
[ ClubWin!/CW1
[ MCP Windows 95/Windows Networking
[ Collector of "classic" computers
[ http://highgate.comm.sfu.ca/~rcini/classiccmp/
<================ reply separator =================>
I'm sure some of you have seen this already...
http://www.ramtrom.com
Ramtron is a producer of "ferroelectric ram" devices. Two weeks
ago they announced a 256k bit part.
To keep on topic: this is exactly what I need for my single-board
Scenix-based PDP-8 emulator! No damn battery backup needed and
you don't have to reload RIM every time you boot.
-Gary
<To add insult to injury, here in Pac*Hell land both PB and Covad consider
<DSL to be a "best effort" service; if they can't get it to work they can
<just walk away from the deal.
Or here 25mi west of Boston where I can nearly see the CO and BellAtlantic
says "soon" which translates to, your small fry, we can't bother.
In the meantime I have RCN ringing the doorbell every week for cable,
broadband and phone... I hold little interest in cable modem as I can
see that loading up and getting bogged down.
Allison
>Now, I vaguely remember a series of articles in Kilobaud, Dr Dobbs or
>maybe Byte on constructing your own forth like language in the early 80s.
>Anyone remember these? Are there copies?
There was an issue of BYTE dedicated to threaded languages; it's been a
while since I read it, but IIRC it was pretty much devoted to FORTH.
There was also a book which somehow was related to the articles that
went through the process of building your own FORTH. Unfortuantely, I
don't have a copy of that.
Roger Ivie
ivie(a)cc.usu.edu
All,
I suspect you've seen this, but if not, here it is. I can't get the
machine from San Bruno, but for anybody that can, looks pretty neat.
- Mark
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Tuesday, February 29, 2000
Thanks for your inquiry about the VAX 11/785 we have available. We are
located in San Bruno, California, about 15 miles south of San Francisco.
Here are the specs:
DEC VAX 11/785 2MB memory CPU
(4) 622MB fixed disk drives/qbus ([3] SI RA90's, [1] DEC RA82 system disk)
UDA50 controller
Exabyte 8200 8mb cartridge tape drive
CIPHER streaming tape drive
BASIC license
VMS 5.3 license
Topaz line conditioner (220 volt line)
We also have quite a few Dec manuals and books related to VMS 5.3 and
you're welcome to them as well if you are interested.
Last time I checked, everything worked, but if you take it, it is as-is
condition.
We are retiring this big boy and want to move it out of our server room.
We will take the highest bidder under the following conditions:
1) Bidder must arrange and pay for all shipping and freight costs.
2) All equipment must be off our premises by March 17, 2000.
3) Payment must be cash or certified check.
We're not looking for a lot of money, just moving this guy off our premises
soon as possible!
Let me know if you're interested ASAP at the email address below.
Joyce Wright
MIS Manager
Joyce_Wright(a)sclay.com
vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv
>This is almost 20 year old memory cells trying to activate here, but I
>thought Forth was generally implemented by "compilation" into a non-standard
>pCode which was then run interpretively by a stack oriented run time engine.
That's one way of doing it, but the most traditional (and still most
popular, at least from what I see) way of doing it is to compile
straight to threaded machine code.
Note that even though threaded code is usually most commonly associated
with Forth and other "non-traditional" languages, the technique
is applicable to old-line languages as well. For example, Fortran IV
compilers on the PDP-11 could optionally compile to threaded machine code,
usually producing smaller object code as a result.
>Thus, I would have said it was a stack oriented language. But I guess it
>depends on if you're looking at the language itself or how it is normally
>executed?
To me, at least, threaded means "you call a subroutine for everything".
For instance, if you want to add two numbers, you push them onto a
(or the) stack and call the add routine. It's the extreme opositte
of "inline" code, to the point where you can think that you're working
on a "virtual" machine that doesn't have the limitations of your
"real" machine (probably why you've confused Forth with p-Code type
intermediate representations - after all, conceptually they aren't that
different!)
--
Tim Shoppa Email: shoppa(a)trailing-edge.com
Trailing Edge Technology WWW: http://www.trailing-edge.com/
7328 Bradley Blvd Voice: 301-767-5917
Bethesda, MD, USA 20817 Fax: 301-767-5927
Greetings again!
I'm in need of some printed documentation with regards to the HP2100 or
HP21MX diagnostics. While each of the diagnostics are available separately,
a large chunk of diagnostics are put on a single set of 3 paper tapes. I do
have the tapes, but not the manual that goes with it. The manual is
24396-14001. That's the one I need as this "manual" actually is a manual on
each diagnostic included in the three tapes above. Can any of the 2100 or
21MX folks check and see if they have this manual laying around?
In the event no one has 24396-14001, I would also be able to just get along
with the manuals on a few of the diagnostics. Those critical ones would be:
02100-90219 Core memory (2100/16/15/14)
24395-90001 Semiconductor memory (21MX)
02100-90221 Memory Parity Check
02100-90216 Power fail auto restart
24391-90001 General purpose register
24322-90002 Direct Memory Access (2100/21MX)
Thanks for checking!
Jay West
It is still work in progress. I have a new location for it and I am in the
process rebuilding it on this new server. It won't be much longer now.
--
Kevan
'Those who do not understand Unix are condemned to reinvent it, poorly.'
- Henry Spencer
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Aaron Christopher Finney [mailto:af-list@wfi-inc.com]
> Sent: 01 March 2000 07:07
> To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org
> Subject: List archives available?
>
>
>
> In searching for various things, I keep running into Kevan
> Heydon's now
> defunct archive. Has someone else made the archive available online?
>
>
>
>
Howdy;
I've long been intrigued by Symbolics LISP machines and I finally had the
opportunity to get one to poke at. (English grammar now requires me to
point out that I took advantage of that opportunity. (: )
I've been thumbing through some of the docs to get a better idea of how
things work, which effort has lead me to two questions:
1) Where am I likely to find a mouse for this beast? I haven't one and it
appears as though the environment expects to use one.
2) Can the FEP software be loaded onto a virgin disk by someone other than
Symbolics? The disk in my system may have problems, and as near as I can
tell the machines arrived new with at least a bare modicum of software on
the disk.
Inquiring minds want to know.
ok
r.
I have a MPI (CDC) 5.25 full height 2sided drive and some questions.
Part number is 77711800
is this 35, 40 or "other" cylinders?
is it 48tpi, 96 or maybe 100 tpi?
It gets cranky from tracks 9-14 inward (even a Format) and it makes me
wonder what it is or is it just flakey? Appearances suggest flakey but I'm
making sure it's not an oddball MPI 100tpi.
FYI: it's a NS* Advantage and it runs fine off a generic HH5.25/48tpi
floppy.
Anyone have a NS* CP/M OS manual for it. It has CP/M and it's apparently
a NS* version for the Advantage and slightly strange compared to others I've
seen?
Allison
Forth and PostScript are quite similar but I wouldn't
<say that LISP was a stack based language. It uses stacks
<but most languages use stacks. In Forth, you have direct
<control of two stacks as necessary for the language.
First to me stack languages are the post-fixed non register
variable oriented ones that are very unlike Pascal, C or Basic.
< Forth has the advantage that action is read
<left to right or "Do-it As You See It". LISP
<has the ability to concatenate several of similar
<operations like (+ ).
I know Forth by way of postscript as they are very similar if you pull
the graphic operators out of postscript. Lisp, I doubt I've seen it.
<LISP has the advantage over
<Forth in that all parameters are specific in the
This is lost one me as lisp is largely unknown.
Allison
Hello all,
I just obtained a box of goodies, and these Intersil ICL7601CPD 14 pin
ceramic dips were in the lot. I can't seem to locate any information on
them. Can anyone give me a clue?
BTW, also in the box were a bunch of common NOS (mid 1970s era) TTL, 2 Zilog
Z-80s, and a National Semi DT1050 Digitalker Standard Vocabulary Kit still
in the original NS box in an antistat bag, along with the DT1050 docs
Thanks,
Bill
whdawson(a)mlynk.com
In a message dated 2/27/2000 8:16:47 AM Pacific Standard Time,
kyrrin(a)bluefeathertech.com writes:
> The annual Mike and Key Amateur Radio Club swap meet is coming up again at
> the Western Washington (Puyallup) Fairgrounds on Saturday, March 11, from
> 09:00-15:00 Pacific time. Parking is free, admission is $6.00 with kids
> under 16 free when accompanied by an adult.
>
One great swapmeet. Very large. Get there early. Or better yet get a table.
Paxton
Aaron:
I happen to like the combination of Acrobat Exchange 3.01 and my HP Scan
Jet with document feeder. It's not blazingly fast, but it works. I have it c
onnected to my AHA2940UW controller.
Rich
[ Rich Cini
[ ClubWin!/CW1
[ MCP Windows 95/Windows Networking
[ Collector of "classic" computers
[ http://highgate.comm.sfu.ca/~rcini/classiccmp/
<================ reply separator =================>
On February 28, Shawn T. Rutledge wrote:
> Do they still have performance advantages over less specialized systems?
> What kind of hardware modifications would optimize execution of Lisp?
Hmm...what processor instructions might one create to deal with a
language with more parens than actual code? ;)
-Dave McGuire
On February 28, Shawn T. Rutledge wrote:
> > Hmm...what processor instructions might one create to deal with a
> > language with more parens than actual code? ;)
>
> I doubt that is an issue... I've never written a lisp interpreter (wish
> I'd had one of those CS classes where they do that) but I'd guess the
> ASCII source code gets tokenized into some kind of tree structure which
> is probably interpreted by doing a tree traversal, so the parens are all
> gone by that point (they just tell it how to build the tree). But I can't
> think of any hardware optimizations that help with trees, other than the
> concept of a "stack", which is hardly a new one. Evidently there are some
> though.
'Twas a joke, man...
-Dave McGuire
Greetings;
I've finally gotten (again) my HP2100's to the point where I can run real
diagnostics. The memory architecture doesn't appear all that different from
a PDP-8E at the board level anyways (there's a memory controller board, a
load board, an ID board, an XY driver board, and the core array).
My question is this: I heard from a reseller that one should run the memory
diagnostics in loop mode for 48 to 72 hours before assuming the memory
subsystem is a good one. Bear in mind that when the diagnostic is run
without loop mode, it only takes about 8 minutes to complete. This would
mean 360 passes being made in 48 hours. From others experience, is 48 hours
really necessary? I mean, isn't a good 4 hours enough to test for heat
problems, etc? Unlike the reseller, I don't need to be 100% positive a board
is perfect before sending it to a customer, I just want to be reasonably
sure I can remove the memory system from the list of possible trouble spots
as I go on to test other things. I was hoping that there would be nothing
about the HP core subsystem that would require that long of burn in, and
thus the experience others have had with other systems might be valid
experience.
So how long do YOU loop memory diags to test a core memory system to be
reasonably sane?
Thanks in advance!
Jay West
Yes, I consider this on-topic because two of my intranet's servers will be
MicroVAX III's. ;-)
After much fencing with my local telco over loop lengths, and a snail-mail
letter asking them why their competition (AT&T and Covad) were willing to
do what they were not (at the time), I have a due date for my DSL
connection! It'll be (minimum) 256K up/downstream guaranteed, and those
rates could fluctuate a bit depending on the usual variables.
This means that, shortly thereafter, I'll be taking full control of my own
domain, including all servers, and (finally!) starting to set up what I
hope will be a very useful FTP and web site for anyone who futzes with
"classic" computing or electronic equipment (ham radio stuff included).
This won't happen overnight! It's going to take some time to build up the
thing the way I want it to be.
With that in mind, I have a request: Those of you who are fluent with
setting up servers (Unix/NetBSD-based) on a small intranet, and tying said
intranet through a Livingston IRX/Firewall router to the outside world, AND
that would be willing to help me keep from making too many mistakes in
setting things up, please raise your hand and let me know if I can contact
you periodically for help and advice.
FWIW, I plan to have: Two DNS, two mail (for redundancy/fault tolerance),
single news/FTP box combined, and a single web server.
My current setup is on one of the InterNIC-reserved Class C net spaces:
192.168.42.0 - 192.168.42.254. The DSL "modem" (a misnomer if I ever saw
one) will be a Cisco 675. Its Ethernet port will tie to one side of the
Livingston router. Said router will provide firewalling and
packet-filtering capabilities that the Cisco lacks.
The Livingston will also provide NAT services to translate the five static
IPs I get from USWest onto the private network side.
I plan to use my own pair of DNS servers as primary and secondary hosts
for my domain, with USWest acting as tertiary. The DNS boxes will be old
Sun IPC's. They've already been configured.
Thanks much!
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Bruce Lane, Owner and head honcho, Blue Feather Technologies
http://www.bluefeathertech.com // E-mail: kyrrin(a)bluefeathertech.com
Amateur Radio: WD6EOS since Dec. '77
"Our science can only describe an object, event, or living thing in our
own human terms. It cannot, in any way, define any of them..."
I just talked to a guy that worked (in an executive type position) years ago
at a company called MeasureX. According to him, MeasureX bought a lot of
HP2100's for their process control stuff. They got tired of the problems
associated with the cpu card set consisting of 8 cards (9 with DMA - er -
DCPC in HP lingo) and the problems with the wire-wrapped backplanes.
They redesigned the 2100 cpu to fit on a single card - one PCB - no
wirewrapping, all etched traces. They sold this redesigned cpu (actually
just a relayout of the circuits) back to HP, and HP dubbed it the 21MX
(where the MX is for MeasureX). This was also the origin of the "build your
own modular HP", called the K series where you pick and choose cpu boards,
slot assemblies, etc. at time of order.
He also mentioned that HP used to charge (at the time) $1400 to "clean the
backplane". MeasureX found out that the CE's were just taking out all the
cards and taking the unit to a car wash and spraying them with pressured
water and then sun-drying them in the back of a closed up station wagon in
the summer. So---- MeasureX just started doing it themselves and save a huge
sum of money :)
I found these tidbits interesting!
Regards,
Jay West
I know we've discussed this ad nauseum here, but I had a specific question
for those who have a little more experience with scanning documents.
What I'm interested in doing is creating searchable, text-imbedded pdf
files as well as tiff files. For those who've done this, could you give me
a little rundown on the process you used? I've got Acrobat 3.0, which
works fine to produce image-only pdf files that are, incidentally,
slightly bigger than that source tiff files. So far I've been scanning
bi-tonal at 300dpi, which seemed to me to provide the best quality/size
ratio for the image files.
Any help at all with this would be much appreciated...
Aaron
Hi all,
Kind of a blah trip for me to TRW this month; last time I had almost no
money and there was a bunch of stuff I wanted, this time I went loaded and
only bought two extender boards for $1 each. Hmph.
However, I did get to meet up with Marvin and Eliot Moore, from whom I
acquired a couple of nifty qbus boards...one of which is an Emulex TC31.
Does anyone have any documentation for this board, or have a minute to run
over the dip switches for me? As always, help is much appreciated...
Cheers,
Aaron
"Bill Dawson" <whdawson(a)mlynk.com> wrote:
> I just obtained a box of goodies, and these Intersil ICL7601CPD 14 pin
> ceramic dips were in the lot. I can't seem to locate any information on
> them. Can anyone give me a clue?
It is an Op-Amp, officially listed as Commutating Auto-Zero (CAZ) Operational
Amplifier. It is listed in their 1979 databook.
1 C1 Capacitor across pins 1/2
2 C1
3 +IN
4 AZ Auto-Zero
5 -IN
6 C2 Capacitor across pins 6/7
7 C2
8 V-
9 Bias
10 Output
11 V+
12 OSC
13 n/c
14 DR
V+/V- supply up to +/- 18 volts
HTH
Mike
Here it is, 24 hours down the log. I have recieved quite a few
thoughtful e-mails from various Folk on this List: Thank you all.
I have given even *more* thought to my situation here, in light of
various developments, and will try an experiment, vizt.,
I will dump some of the Junk... and believe me some of it's no
more than scrap.... list to follow. ;}
I will place some items in a long-term storage facility that I have
currently warehousing one of my oldest 'dormant' hobbies... my
lovely ten-rank pipe organ, which come to think of it, would probably
fit where the computers are now.... no, forget it.
I will concentrate on a few systems, and NOT collect any more
stuff for the nonce.
The offer to sell my Vintage Computer Collection is hereby
withdrawn, and again, my great "thank yous" to all who responded. It
was a valuable exercise for me, if nothing else. Guess I'm a hard
core mainline computer junkie.
The MINC is *still* going to CCHM.
sigh.
Cheers
John
Hi all
>Lots of sites are starting to refuse mail from open relays. Your ISP is
>going to have to come up with a better solution.
I'm --><-- this close to blocking mail from all of .co.jp
Open relays, *nobody* seems to have an abuse@ address, and we don't
have customers over there anyway. :-)
But I'll probably use the open relay database...
W
Jay wrote
>Bruce wrote...
>> connection! It'll be (minimum) 256K up/downstream guaranteed, and those
>> rates could fluctuate a bit depending on the usual variables.
>Um... you might want to check the fine print on the DSL service agreement.
I agree fully here! There's vast differences between DSL service from
different suppliers. The el-cheapo suppliers might route all of your
traffic to the other side of the continent and back before it goes
anywhere. (Flashcom does this, for example.) The really good providers
have real service level agreements, guaranteed time commitments, and
other frills. (My DSL carrier, UUNet, will call me within a few minutes
if for any reason they are unable to ping my DSL router. So whenever
the power is out, or I'm just moving some wires here in the shop, I know
who's going to be the first to call me.) (Another top-notch DSL provider
is Savvis.)
Also thoroughly check out your options in terms of multiple static IP's, etc.,
if this is important to you. These aren't important issues to folks who are
using a PC-clone to surf the web over a DSL line, but if you want to hook
older machines to your LAN to get to the outside world through DSL you do
need to pay attention here.
--
Tim Shoppa Email: shoppa(a)trailing-edge.com
Trailing Edge Technology WWW: http://www.trailing-edge.com/
7328 Bradley Blvd Voice: 301-767-5917
Bethesda, MD, USA 20817 Fax: 301-767-5927
On Feb 28, 19:49, Jay West wrote:
> Pete wrote....
> > My ISP runs two SMTP mail servers, one open, the other not;
> Open relays have NOTHING to do with the above situation - talk about
> throwing the baby out with the bathwater - the above scenario is akin to
> saying "gee, I want to allow http through my firewall, so lets just open
the
> firewall up for all ports and all services to and from anywhere".
Well, maybe, which is why the European ISPs (and mine in particular) are
looking for another method. As more and more sites use MAPS or other
services, the need for a better solution becomes greater.
> There are two other much more "standard" methods of allowing the above.
> First, the user could still check his email at his original/local
provider
> via pop or imap,
they do that anyway -- *receiving* mail isn't part of the problem.
> and he could send mail from the smtp server at his
> nonlocal/traveling provider.
But it would have the "wrong" address, and lots of people can't seem to
cope with that.
> Second, any time an ISP sets up an agreement
> with another ISP to let their users roam, they could just add the roaming
> ISP's domain name to their sendmail.cw file to allow relaying from that
> domain only.
Agreed, but we're talking about hundreds of ISPs, not just a few. And for
reasons I've never really understood, quite a number of European ISPs,
including one of the biggest UK providers, don't provide DNS PTR records
for their dialups (so authentication is more difficult).
I'm not personally advocating the use of open relays, BTW. The servers I
help manage are not open, because we were hit a long time ago. I'm merely
pointing out an instance where a bunch of ISPs have seen them as an interim
solution -- and issue warnings to roaming users that some of their mail may
bounce because recipient servers may block them.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
On Feb 29, 0:53, Eric Smith wrote:
> Pete writes:
> > My ISP runs two SMTP mail servers, one open, the other not;
> This can be solved by having your POP or IMAP daemon open up temporary
> access to your SMTP server from the roaming IP address after the POP or
> IMAP connection is authenticated. This is what I do for some of my
users.
> If you use qmail there's a readymade program available, but it should be
> easy to set it up for Sendmail.
That's one of the methods being trialled by my ISP (they use Exim for
(E)SMTP). They'r also loking at some sort of password-based authentication
but I don't know how that works.
> Another approach is for the "roaming" relay to only accept email with
both
> envelope sender and from headers of legitimate customers. This isn't as
> secure, but is still much better than a wide-open relay. If a spammer
> discovers the relay by scanning IP addresses for SMTP ports, they still
> won't be able to use it unless they also can determine who the legitimate
> users of that SMTP server are.
True, but that requires spoofing the envelope sender address, which isn't
so easy to do on some systems. It also requires even more setup for the
ISP than Jay's suggestion of adding domains to sendmail.cw.
I know of one common SMTP package (Mercury, for Novell) that allows a
simpler system. It's much less secure, because it doesn't really check the
addresses; it merely relies on the From address matching the server's own
domain. Needless to say, that's easy for anyone -- including a spammer --
to spoof.
> > However, until there's a sensible system to deal with roaming users'
need to
> > send mail as well as receive it, there will be open relays.
>
> Lots of sites are starting to refuse mail from open relays. Your ISP is
> going to have to come up with a better solution.
Indeed, and they are looking. IPv6 should eventually remove the problem,
of course, but that's some way off.
Anyone know the number of the RFC for roaming IP, which Shawn mentioned?
I'd like to take a look at it.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
Harris recently spun the Intersil division off into its own entity. Believe
it or not, you may find data at www.intersil.com.
Dick
-----Original Message-----
From: Bill Dawson <whdawson(a)mlynk.com>
To: Classiccmp@Classiccmp. Org <classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org>
Date: Monday, February 28, 2000 9:00 PM
Subject: INTERSIL ICL7601CPD info needed
>Hello all,
>
>I just obtained a box of goodies, and these Intersil ICL7601CPD 14 pin
>ceramic dips were in the lot. I can't seem to locate any information on
>them. Can anyone give me a clue?
>
>BTW, also in the box were a bunch of common NOS (mid 1970s era) TTL, 2
Zilog
>Z-80s, and a National Semi DT1050 Digitalker Standard Vocabulary Kit still
>in the original NS box in an antistat bag, along with the DT1050 docs
>
>Thanks,
>
>Bill
>
>whdawson(a)mlynk.com
>
>
<compete for bandwidth availability. As a result, DSL speed guarantees have
<absolutely NOTHING to do with the internet speed you get. I won't go into
<examples, but I'm sure many folks here will immediately see the
<ramifications of this. Think of a file download where each packet comes at
<256k but there's 300ms pauses between each packet!
I already hit sites like that with my 33.6 modem.
My take is the path is as good as the narrowest point and likely the DSL
connection is not that choke point.
Allison
On Feb 24, 21:15, Eric Smith wrote:
> Hans wrote:
> > What's proper or not is a matter of opinion, and in my mind
> > open relays are a basic part of the mail system.
>
> Can you cite any legitimate use for a completely open relay? I can't
> think of any. Lacking such examples, I agree with Scott G. Taylor's
> statement:
> > The simple fact-of-the-matter is, open relays are wrong.
My ISP runs two SMTP mail servers, one open, the other not; for a very good
reason. A large number of customers travel across Europe, and it is not
practical for them to always dial the ISP at international rates. Hence,
there are a number of agreements between several ISPs in several European
countries, which allow customers registered with one ISP to use the
points-of-presence of another. However, the roaming user typically wants
to keep his normal email address (ie, have mail appear to originate from
his normal address). To do so, he must either use his "home" server
despite his temporary IP address/hostname not matching that server's domain
(which would look like an attempted forgery to a spam-blocking server) or
must use the "local" server and forge the sender address (which would also
fail on any normal spam-blocking server).
This practice is quite widespread in Europe. Jay's use of MAPS doesn't
bother me, because I can (almost) always use the blocking server, and I
expect that for most roaming users the inconvenience is minimal. However,
until there's a sensible system to deal with roaming users' need to send
mail as well as receive it, there will be open relays.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
The ringing voltage is over 250 volts peak-to-peak but at a high enough
voltage to make you jerk your hand away if you touch it. The voltage range
that's most dangerous is from 25volts to about 60 volts, as it won't make
you jerk your hand (or other body part) away, yet it is capable of
disrupting normal operation of the cardio-vascular system.
I've never seen a precise write-up of what it takes to kill you, but I'd
avoid contact with voltages such as this just to avoid the pain.
Dick
-----Original Message-----
From: Bruce Lane <kyrrin(a)bluefeathertech.com>
To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org <classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org>
Date: Monday, February 28, 2000 8:25 AM
Subject: Re: Is ringing voltage dangerous?
>At 05:56 28-02-2000 -0800, you wrote:
>
>>You know, I've been told it's painful, but is it dangerous?
>
> <snarph>
>
> Any voltage along those lines can be dangerous if it passes through the
>chest. My understanding is that it takes less than 20mA of current flow to
>kill a person.
>
> Be safe rather than sorry.
>
>
>
>-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>Bruce Lane, Owner and head honcho, Blue Feather Technologies
>http://www.bluefeathertech.com // E-mail: kyrrin(a)bluefeathertech.com
>Amateur Radio: WD6EOS since Dec. '77
>"Our science can only describe an object, event, or living thing in our
>own human terms. It cannot, in any way, define any of them..."
Careful, Joe . . . the ring voltage spec I remember said it was about 128
volts AC centered about the battery voltage, which is conventionally -48
volts. That's where the 80-volts at 20 hertz comes from, since that's what
you see by way of a rectifier diode. That's not a true sinusoid, though,
it's the humps from a sinusoid rectified to ground when the median of the
sinusoid is at -48Vdc.
I don't really know that this can kill or even harm you in some other major
way, but it's unpleasant enough that it makes sense to avoid it. That urge
to pull my hand out of the box when I'm bitten by a higher voltage than I
like is what's made me unwilling to work on TV sets with their puched
chassis, etc.
Dick
-----Original Message-----
From: Joe <rigdonj(a)intellistar.net>
To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org <classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org>
Date: Monday, February 28, 2000 9:45 AM
Subject: Re: Is ringing voltage dangerous?
>At 05:56 AM 2/28/00 -0800, Danial wrote:
>>You know, I've been told it's painful, but is it dangerous?
>>I just told another group about the supply I have (It outputs 110AC, 30hz,
>>.06 amp), and realized it's 110. Isn't that dangerous? If I really did
zap
>>my kid brother with it, would it just hurt or could it really HURT him?
>>-------
>>
>
> No, it'll just hurt him. It'll sure get his attention though! I've been
>shocked by them dozens of times. FWIW the normal (US) telephone ringing
>voltage is only 48 volts or so. The old telephones and military field
>phones with the hand cranks with put out over 100 volts. Those hurt!
>
> Joe
>
These comments are clearly made by someone who has experience with this
matter!
Dick
-----Original Message-----
From: Tony Duell <ard(a)p850ug1.demon.co.uk>
To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org <classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org>
Date: Monday, February 28, 2000 4:40 PM
Subject: Re: Is ringing voltage dangerous?
>>
>>
>> >RULE 1, unless the voltage is very low it _can_ be dangerous. Low is
hard
>> > number be exact about but, over 12-30V is the watch out zone.
>> >RULE 2, All efforts are to be made to avoid crossing the heart or chest
>> > as a possible path for safety. One hand in pocket rule is
derived
>> > from this.
>> >RULE 3, if you not sure, make sure. get a meter and find out if it's
live
>> > and how hot hot is.
>>
>>
>> I just want to add a rule - Don't always trust what the meter says. I
took
>
>I believe that when working on live power lines and other circuits
>carrying dangerous voltages, you test the meter on a known HV source,
>then you test the line, then you test the meter again on said known HV
>source. Then, normally, you connect the power line to earth, assuming
>it's shown to be dead. And only then do you touch it.
>
>Some HV meters used for this sort of thing have a 'proving unit' (a small
>PSU that gives out a few kV at a minimal current, running off batteries)
>in the carrying case for these tests.
>
>> 1950 v from an electron multiplier supply because the meter read around
40
>> volts. There was a common failure mode of this supply that it would shut
>> down to 40 v. Instead of walking around to shut it off before
>
>Ouch!. That's not pleasant :-(. Oh, and never trust indicator lamps (they
>can burn out), and never trust on/off switches to isolate something. Pull
>the mains plug and put it where you can see it (or some idiot will plug
>it in again).
>
>I'll add another 'rule'... When you are sure something is not live, brush
>it with the back of your finger. If, by some strange chance it _is_ still
>live, your finger will be thrown off. Touch it with the front of your
>finger and you'll be forced into better contact with it.
>
>-tony
>
I didn't expect such a response for this! Tell you what I'll do, since I
don't really have the proper facilites for making good copies of the
extended pages...I'll just scan it and post it within the next couple of
days to the web site.
BTW, the actual nice paper copy I have was spoken for within 5 minutes or
so of my original post...
Cheers,
Aaron
>RULE 1, unless the voltage is very low it _can_ be dangerous. Low is hard
> number be exact about but, over 12-30V is the watch out zone.
>RULE 2, All efforts are to be made to avoid crossing the heart or chest
> as a possible path for safety. One hand in pocket rule is derived
> from this.
>RULE 3, if you not sure, make sure. get a meter and find out if it's live
> and how hot hot is.
I just want to add a rule - Don't always trust what the meter says. I took
1950 v from an electron multiplier supply because the meter read around 40
volts. There was a common failure mode of this supply that it would shut
down to 40 v. Instead of walking around to shut it off before
disconnecting the meter (after all the supply was dead right? ) I just
disconnected the meter. Surprise the supply was good and the meter was
dead. I almost was also. I had severe cramps in that arm and shoulder for
almost 2 days.
Dan
>Over the years working with RF and transmitters I've been hit with RF and
>DC to 1800V (ouch!) and LF AC power to 200V/400hz. Some were annoying,
>a few painful, one nearly bluecrossed me and the better ones left scars
>(and a willingness to NOT stick fingers in).
>
>
>Allison
>
>
Hi all,
I finally got the rest of the RT-11v2 System Reference Manual online
tonight:
http://www.prinsol.com/~aaron/classiccmp/rt11v2manual/
I haven't had time to put together the rest yet (appendices, etc.) and I
also have release notes from Fortran IV and some other stuff to put up.
Also in the works are a couple of handbooks and the like, an IBM
System/360 Fortran IV manual, some older SunOS docs...and whatever else I
can find around here to scan.
Cheers,
Aaron
:wq
No, I wasn't really gonna zap my kid brother! That was a hypothetical question.
I was more worried about zapping myself, and I try to follow the one-hand-in
your-pocket rule whenever I can. I know better than to zap anyone with anything
I wouldn't zap myself with.
(But a good shot of signal voltage (+28VDC, 2 amps) across his earlobes next
time he gets out of the shower is very tempting! J/K!)
Oh, and the 9V battery story, I got told it was a Navy guy who fell on his
voltmeter probes. It's probably another urban legend.
-------
You know, I've been told it's painful, but is it dangerous?
I just told another group about the supply I have (It outputs 110AC, 30hz,
.06 amp), and realized it's 110. Isn't that dangerous? If I really did zap
my kid brother with it, would it just hurt or could it really HURT him?
-------
One of my 2100's has developed a problem. It was working fine for some time,
but was only powered up occasionally. The problem started when I ran some
burn-in diags over several days. The machine started acting funny, and when
I powered it off and back on, there's no front panel display at all - no
lights. However, all the fans come up, one of the internal boards that has
an on-board led is lit, and I checked all the outputs of the power supply
and they're just peachy. I moved every single card (including the front
panel) from the bad system to another system and it then runs fine so I know
it's not any cards. I suspect the power supply, but as I said all the
outputs appear good. Gawd I hope nothing happened to that wire-wrap
backplane.
Can anyone offer some advice? I'm starting to pour over the schematics on
the power supply - wondering if something is amis with the poweron or
powergood signal perhaps but I don't know much about it.
Any tips most appreciated!
Jay West
Hi all...
I am still looking for any information I can find on a Sony SMC-70. User
Manual, pinout diagrams etc. Any info would be appreciated. I have CP/M
disks.
tia
jeff duncan
Here's a new discussion for ya': a top ten list of the best laptop
kayboards! I already know who's going to be number 1, but, just the same,
here are my picks for the list:
Postion Laptop
1. TRS-80 Model 100
2. TRS-80 Model 200
(In the Top 5) Macintosh Portable
(In the Top 10) Toshiba T-1000
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
I got a couple of "free" VT320 terminals with a system I picked up and they
both work but they are both pretty dim. (one is reasonably bright after a
30 - 40 minute warm up). Now in the video game market there are kits to
rejuvenate a tube but I don't know what the equivalent would be for a
VT320. Tony? Anyone? Is there anything I can do?
--Chuck
Hi,
I've got a photocopy of the technical manual (mechanical breakdowns/etc)
for a Cipher F880/C880 available to anyone who wants it. It's a
professional-quality photocopy that John L. made and the original claimant
didn't want. Anyone with a need can have it...
Cheers,
Aaron
Here is someone with a Tandy 6000 system that needs to go to a good home.
Please contact the owner directly.
Reply-to: catskill(a)catskill.net
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2000 09:04:36 -0500
From: Catskill <catskill(a)catskill.net>
To: Vintage Computer Festival <vcf(a)siconic.com>
Subject: Re: Old Working Computer
In Fleischmanns, NY 12430. The town is located in the southeastern tier of
New York (Catskill Mountain) about 100 miles due northwest of New York
City and 110 miles due east from Binghamton, NY.
Incidentally, I forgot to mention that then Tandy 6000 HD comes with a
harddrive and a "memory expansion unit" - also a few 8" disks.
----- Original Message -----
To: Catskill
Sent: Friday, February 25, 2000 12:24 AM
Subject: Re: Old Working Computer
On Sun, 20 Feb 2000, Catskill wrote:
> One vintage Tandy 6000 in very good working order for the price of
> shipping it to you if you are interested.
Sellam International Man of Intrigue and Danger
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Looking for a six in a pile of nines...
VCF Europe: April 29th & 30th, Munich, Germany
VCF Los Angeles: Summer 2000 (*TENTATIVE*)
VCF East: Planning in Progress
See http://www.vintage.org for details!
John,
Well I know that A: I can;t afford all of it, and B: I don't need more than
one 11/34, etc., hehe. Anyways, I wanted to ask if you have a spare 11/34
front panel you could possibly spare, since mine has none. Also, the 2nd
weekend in March will be Wang day.
Will J
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
--- "Clint Wolff (VAX collector)" <vaxman(a)uswest.net> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I have spent all day trying to get VMS 5.4 loaded onto my 11/750, but
> I can't figure out how to get standalone backup to find the hard drive.
>
> My configuration:
>
> CPU:
> 11/750
> Massbus?
> Emulex SC750/B? (RM03/RM05/RM80 compatible)
> Fujitsu Eagle (M2351?)
> Emulex SC750/B? (RM03/RM05/RM80 compatible)
>
> 4.3 BSD recognizes the Fuji drive, and calls it hp(0,0), but I can't
> get standalone backup (version 4.4) to recognize it...
All unicies I've worked with in the DEC world were great about non-DEC
disk controllers. Even 2.9BSD for the PDP-11 loves Unibus SMD disk
controllers in the install (xp driver).
> Any suggestions? I've tried DUA0, DRA0, DBA0, and several others...
ISTR that with third-party disk controllers, it was common to cut custom
SA Backup tapes. We always had SI/9900 controllers so I can't comment to
your Emulex boards specifically, but I know we had to patch the DRDRIVER.EXE
to recognize an Eagle as an oversized RM05. The smaller Fuji drive (a 160Mb)
showed up under VMS and UNIX as a pair of RM03s, DRA0 and DRA1. We didn't
have to do anything to the drives for that one - the geometry was emulated
exactly.
Depending on MASSBUS slot number (set by the jumpers on the backplane, but
typically never altered from factory spec), it's possible that your drive
might show up as DRB0 or DRC0, especially if there are multiple MASSBUS
options installed or even a second Unibus (L0010 card).
One of the features of later SA Backups was that it would print out your
available disk and tape configuration as part of the startup process. If
you are loading such a version and the tape drive shows up but not your
Emulex disk, suspect driver issues with the SA Backup tapes, especially if
they are DEC standard. I think that crept in around VMS 5, though. If
you can get a newer Backup, it might help you identify what, if any, drive
letters it shows up as.
-ethan
=====
Infinet has been sold. The domain goes away on 15 March.
See http://www.infinet.com/ for details.
Please update your address lists to reflect my new address:
erd(a)iname.com
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger.
http://im.yahoo.com
--- Christian Fandt <cfandt(a)netsync.net> wrote:
> Upon the date 02:27 PM 2/27/00 -0800, John Lawson said something like:
> >again I stress that this is an all-or-nothing, I'm leaving the Hobby
> >and never looking back type of deal.
>
> I'm really sorry to see you leave John!
I agree.
> Not many of us folks have yet figured out how to make a typical
> minicomputer look like a piece of wood furniture in order to please
> the spouse/S.O. ;)
I do have these LSI-11/03 machines in 3' tall DEC cabinets with casters and
woodgrain formica tops - they could pass for end tables. I got them from OSU
at the surplus yard about 8 years ago - 11/03 w/DLV11J, RXV11, RX01 and a
small amount of MOS memory (8K?) They make up an important segment of my
basement work area as portable Qbus space with useful work surface on top.
-ethan
=====
Infinet has been sold. The domain goes away on 15 March.
See http://www.infinet.com/ for details.
Please update your address lists to reflect my new address:
erd(a)iname.com
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger.
http://im.yahoo.com
<I have spent all day trying to get VMS 5.4 loaded onto my 11/750, but
<I can't figure out how to get standalone backup to find the hard drive.
The 750 kit had one tu58 with standalone backup on it. You need to get
tape or other removeable media that is bootable.
<PS I shudder to think of my electric bill this month... Yesterday I
<installed and played with 4.3 BSD, today I tried to install VMS...
<Fortunately it is cool enough outside, I can just open the door to
<keep it from overheating...
Shouldn't be that bad for the vax alone, the disks I don't know.
Allison
Heads Up... here's the Deal:
After much mental anguish and thought-form hand wringing, I think
it is best that I unload a Hobby or two and concentrate on other
things..
Therefore:
Seeing as how the Computers are taking up over 30% of my living
space, consuming financial, electrical, and temporal resources, but
not getting used for months at a time... well, you get the Picture.
I am going to sell everything that I now have related to classic
computing.. that is, all the Minis and Micros and everything related
to them: parts, spares, software, documentation, peripherals, sales
material, the related books library, cables, stuff, junk, and even
the little plastic bags full of odd lockwashers.
The Collection is primarily DEC PDP-11 Minis, several 11/34s,
several 11/44s, a few uVAXen, two PRO-350 etc.
The Micros are Apple IIs, Kaypros, various early portables, an
Intecolor with display and trackball, NorthStar Horizons, etc etc
etc etc......
And, 'Yes' this includes the IMSAI, the Altair, and the Heathkit
Large Analogue Computer, and several other quite rare items.
There are not a lot of conditions, save that I will be asking
somewhere between the high four-figures / low five-figures in US
Dollars, and that the Buyer is expected to take *everything*.. ie no
'cherry picking'. My intent is to get my living room back, not start
a part-time surplus business. The Buyer must come to my location
with a truck big enough to do the job, unless the Buyer is local
enough to make two or three trips in the space of a weekend.
The deal will be: We agree on price, you pay me, the check clears
the bank, you show up with truck, we load gear all day, I wave
goodbye when you/it leaves, period, as in sale final, as-is,
where-is, don't even say the word 'warranty' around me.
I'll be happy to discuss in detail with you as to what works, what
doesn't, etc.
The only exception to all of this is the MINC-11, which has been
promised to the Computer History Museum at Moffet Field.
I will send a complete inventory to serious requestors... and
again I stress that this is an all-or-nothing, I'm leaving the Hobby
and never looking back type of deal.
I am located in Los Angeles, CA for your logistical information.
Cheers
John
Lawrence LeMay <lemay(a)cs.umn.edu> wrote:
> Gods gift to computing ;)
> Surely you're referring to something other than the 3000/200... They couldnt
> even write a proper FORTRAN compiler for it. And we never did use the
> 5.25" floppy drives, they didnt seem to provide a proper file oriented
> way to access them (though I suppose it could have been just a lack
> of documentation).
Sounds like a 9000 to me; there never was a 3000 series 200. The only
floppy disc drives I ever heard of on 3000s were 8", and I don't think
that notion caught on.
And if you were using a 3000, you'd have noticed! 3000s don't run
Unix, they run MPE, which (back then at least) was clearly not
Unix-like. They also used to have a thoroughly record-structured
filesystem. Most folks just hate that, though I can't fathom why.
-Frank McConnell
Hi all,
I have spent all day trying to get VMS 5.4 loaded onto my 11/750, but
I can't figure out how to get standalone backup to find the hard drive.
My configuration:
CPU:
11/750
Massbus?
Emulex SC750/B? (RM03/RM05/RM80 compatible)
Fujitsu Eagle (M2351?)
Emulex SC750/B? (RM03/RM05/RM80 compatible)
Memory:
14Meg
Unibus:
TU80 controller
misc other boards
4.3 BSD recognizes the Fuji drive, and calls it hp(0,0), but I can't
get standalone backup (version 4.4) to recognize it...
Any suggestions? I've tried DUA0, DRA0, DBA0, and several others...
Thanks in advance,
clint
PS I shudder to think of my electric bill this month... Yesterday I
installed and played with 4.3 BSD, today I tried to install VMS...
Fortunately it is cool enough outside, I can just open the door to
keep it from overheating...
<He said _a_ 2909. That implies a 4 bit microcode address, which limits it
<to 16 locations. 16 micorocode words and a 4 bit ALU is a small processor
<IMHO. And being an AMD design they won't have simply concatenated an
<'instruction' from external memory (which this board probably doesn't
<have anyway) with those 4 bits.
The 16word microcode limit is the greater problem but, once you understand
how it word concatinating a few more solves that nicely. It's one heck of a
demonstrator.
<For people who've not come across the AMD sequencer chips, they're quite
<nice, and even have things like a return stack (about 4 levels IIRC) to
<allow for subroutines in the microcode.
Depends on which one. the 2910 is 5 and the 09/11 is 4. They are pretty
useful parts for lots of things.
<The 2910 is essentially 3 2909s together with some glue logic in a single
<chip. If you only need 4K of control store it's a nice chip _but it can't
<be extended to give more bits without kludging_. Three rivers made that
<mistake on the PERQ -- the first PERQ had 4K of control store and used a
<2910, all later models had 16K and used a 2910 and a '2 bit kludge' (pun
<intended!).
;) 2910 is a good part and easy to live with unless your doing complex
stuff.
Allison
Hello, all you guys out there
I'm wanting to try out one (or both) of Open BSD and NetBSD on my lil' ol'
Amiga -- I really need someone who has gone through the teething process of
formatting drives and instaling necessary files, etc.
Amiga o/s is neat, but Id like to get into something with a more viable
future.
Gary Hildebrand WA7KKP
Amigaphile and boatanchor collector
PS -- liked that ref to Univax -- reminded me of the Jetsons cartoon where
the robot was called Uniblab . . .
I still have two quick-reference guides for HP1000's available. Cost is
$5.00 each (includes mailing costs -- I decided to discount them some more).
First two takers in order of arrival of an E-mailed response get them.
Thanks much.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Bruce Lane, Owner and head honcho, Blue Feather Technologies
http://www.bluefeathertech.com // E-mail: kyrrin(a)bluefeathertech.com
Amateur Radio: WD6EOS since Dec. '77
"Our science can only describe an object, event, or living thing in our
own human terms. It cannot, in any way, define any of them..."
Thanks go to Craig Smith and Paxton Hoag for claiming the last of the
HP1000 quick-ref guides.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Bruce Lane, Owner and head honcho, Blue Feather Technologies
http://www.bluefeathertech.com // E-mail: kyrrin(a)bluefeathertech.com
Amateur Radio: WD6EOS since Dec. '77
"Our science can only describe an object, event, or living thing in our
own human terms. It cannot, in any way, define any of them..."
On February 27, Innfogra(a)aol.com wrote:
> I just noticed that I have a 6 wide, Probably Unibus, DEC card with 8 Am
> 2901s on it. The number on the tab is L0400. Any idea what it is?
That's the data path board for a CI750, which is a CI interface for
a VAX-11/750.
-Dave McGuire
-----Original Message-----
From: Tony Duell <ard(a)p850ug1.demon.co.uk>
>Any other AM29xx chips on it, like a 2909 or 2910 sequencer? Or is this
>just a demo board for a 4-bit ALU chip?
>
>It sounds like a really interesting find, though. The 29xx series chips
>were interesting devices that have been used in all sorts of machines.
Yep, there is a 2909 on board too....
;)
- Mike: dogas(a)leading.net
If anybody is interested in this then contact Robert directly...
> From: rib(a)cannon-co.freeserve.co.uk>
>
> I have an ancient system dating from circa 1980. It uses the old 8"
> floppy disks. it is quite heavy and bulky but would fit into an estate
> car. It is probably now quite rare but I want to get rid of it (free
> of charge) to anyone who is prepared to pick it from my address in
> Kent. The monitor has packed up but the disk drive/ CPU is working.
> I shall dump it unless you know of anyone who might have it.
>
> Robert Cannon
--
Kevan
On February 26, Mike wrote:
> Yep, she's a beaut... Its an Advanced Micro Devices Am2901 Evaluation and
> Learning Kit. It's basicly a complete front panel board with the cpu and
> everything.. It works. It has 3 nibbles of LEDs (for data display,
> pipeline register, and microword memory) and toggles for address, data,
> ram/mux select, run, load, and single-stepping.
I've got one of those too. What a cool board! I *really* like Am2901s.
-Dave McGuire
Aaron Christopher Finney <af-list(a)wfi-inc.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Feb 2000, Stan Sieler wrote:
> > I thought the 2649 was the OEM version of the 2645 ... and that some
> > of them were sold to people who developed 2649-resident software.
>
> Exactly the case. In fact, I believe it was Wirt Amir on the hp3000-l list
> who was telling me about how his company actually programmed them to be
> stand-alone wordprocessors.
Yeah, I've just never gotten a close enough look at one to be sure.
Other 264X terminals do differ: 2640s have a processor card with
an 8008, and I never figured out what the processor was in the 2647F.
> Thanks for the info! $300 is more than I want to spend on this one, but I
> may have to figure out something if my patience starts to run out...
Hey, this isn't for a PDP-11 or a VAX, it's for an HP3000, which is
God's gift to computing.
-Frank McConnell
The annual Mike and Key Amateur Radio Club swap meet is coming up again at
the Western Washington (Puyallup) Fairgrounds on Saturday, March 11, from
09:00-15:00 Pacific time. Parking is free, admission is $6.00 with kids
under 16 free when accompanied by an adult.
Web info can be found here: http://www.mikeandkey.com/flyer00.htm
(shameless plug alert!) I'll be there selling this year. Here's a partial
listing of what I plan to bring:
Exabyte 8200 and 8500 8mm SCSI tape drives, cleaned and checked out.
A small (400W or so) UPS.
Motorola 'Micor' radios.
A Western Electric "shoebox" 1A2 key system cabinet and line cards.
Anything else I can think of to grab, and that will fit.
I want to bring out some DSD-880's, and maybe a Cipher front-loader, but
Eric Smith was supposed to pick such up from me. On the other wing, he did
not appear when he was scheduled to, and my E-mails to him have gone
unanswered.
Eric, if you're reading this, PLEASE GET IN TOUCH WITH ME! I'm willing to
hold the stuff you wanted for a reasonable amount of time if you'll just
commit to a pickup date. However, I need to clear space for future projects.
Thanks for reading, and I hope to see at least some of you there.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Bruce Lane, Owner and head honcho, Blue Feather Technologies
http://www.bluefeathertech.com // E-mail: kyrrin(a)bluefeathertech.com
Amateur Radio: WD6EOS since Dec. '77
"Our science can only describe an object, event, or living thing in our
own human terms. It cannot, in any way, define any of them..."
AT&T #B2 model 310 and Model 400
I just ran across these two machine along with some sort of AT&T external
case that goes with them. The model 400 has a damaged case, I haven't
looked inside. Rare, interesting, should I save them? I have read the 3B2
FAQ. Anybody else want them?
Mike
mmcfadden(a)cmh.edu
-----Original Message-----
From: Clint Wolff (VAX collector) <vaxman(a)uswest.net>
>How many Am2901's does it have? Is it the 'HEX-29' 16bit computer that
>is shown in AMDs 'Bit-Slice Microprocessor Design' book and app notes?
Just one.
>> ;)
>> - Mike: dogas(a)leading.net
I have a Zenith (Heathkit) H/Z-110 low profile computer with all the options
including the latest MB and 768K of RAM, Dual internal hard drives, outboard
1/2 height 8" Zenith drive unit, the color monitor and the Gemini IBM PC card
(boots PCDOS directly). User, Technical and Service manuals: Full, original
set. Software: Yeah! Lots of it. 15 to 20 original H/Z 3 ring binders of
documentation and at least 150 4.25" disks of software. Operating systems:
ZDOS, MSDOS, CP/M-80 and CP/M-86. I need room. Make me an offer. Shipping
is NOT desired as it will take 3 or 4 large boxes and a lot of work to do it.
Located in the St. Louis area.
Jay West is still working through the pile of H/Z-89 stuff he picked up from
me last month and I may have a few more items of that vintage, spare parts,
software and maybe one more computer, available also. If Jay doesn't want
them, they will be available. Again, I really don't want to ship the big
stuff.
Mike Stover, KB9VU
Really great radios glow in the dark
CCA# 404
MARS AFA3BO
Florissant, MO
I received this charming message from someone today regarding
the audio storage section of my web page http://www.threedee.com/jcm .
- John
:
:::
From: xxxxx(a)aol.com
:
::
:
Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2000 12:35:59 EST
Subject: Cassete tape data storage
To: jfoust(a)threedee.com
:
:
:
When I first saw your page, I was surprised that such a technology ever
existed. Lately, I have been writing a windows program that stores data on
standard cassette tapes, like a cheap alternative to a tape backup drive. I,
being fourteen years old, was not around when the Commodore and other such
systems dominated the market, so I did not know that there was ever a way to
store data on cassette tapes. Once I am completely done, and I can fit a fair
amount of data onto a cassette, I will send you the program. If you know of
any other such programs, please tell me of them. I am interested to find out
more.
Can someone point me in the direction of info on the Sun SServer 690MP. I
have read THE SUN HARDWARE REFERENCE
compiled by James W. Birdsall and need more info.
I seem to have gotten a board set, no backplane, and am interested in
identifying some of the cards. Also looking for more info on the Ross CPU? Is
anyone running one?
OT because it seem to date from 1993.
Have CPU (dual Ross 40 MHz) wi 2 differential SCSI & Fiber & 128 meg ram.
501-2055 wi 2X 501-1902 & 370-1388
Extra memory card wi 128 Meg. 501-1767
PDX92B VME card to SBus ??? 201 963-02
3 IPI controllers 501-1539 & 2X 501-1855
HP 2xxx stuff
Just received this from someone who posted a paper tape punch on eBay.
I asked if he had anything else. Someone on the East Coast may be able
to work something out with him.
"From: Craig Smith <ip500(a)roanoke.infi.net>
Reply-To: ip500(a)roanoke.infi.net
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.04 [en] (Win95; U)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Al Kossow <aek(a)spies.com>
Subject: Re: HP 2100 parts
References: <200002251910.LAA28768(a)spies.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Hi Al,
No 2100 series stuff available but I do have a fair bit of 21MX and
HP 1000 [series E and F] computers and pieces around. Also just hit the
motherload on 2100 documentation----binders full! Am in the process of
sorting it all out. What are you in need of and are you close enough to
Roanoke for some heavy stuff. I've got a number of NICE rack cabinets
and a bunch of the big floor model disc drives in storage and rack mount
disc controllers. Also 2 or 3 of the 7970?? Reel to Reel
data recorders [HEAVY!!]. Lots of 2640 terminals and some of the later
terminals for the 3000 series.
I'm cleaning out a warehouse full of stuff I recently bought and really
am not sure of total numbers of stuff that will be available [or what
else is in there] Every day is a new find. Let me know what your looking
for and I'll do some digging.
Regards, Craig
"
In a message dated 2/26/2000 1:08:02 AM Pacific Standard Time,
rigdonj(a)intellistar.net writes:
> I went into a surplus store today and found a complete set of HP logic
> probes, pulser, chip clip and comparator. I asked what the price was and
> the onwer ran over to his computer and checked to see what they were
> selling for on E-bay. Needless to say, I left without buying it.
Well, Joe, you are a good scrounger. I bet you will find another. Out of
curiosity what was he asking for the set?
Paxton
-----Original Message-----
From: Joe <rigdonj(a)intellistar.net>
> Anytime! I had a ball! Mike forgot to tell everyone about his AMD 2900
>bit slice single board computer. THAT'S COOL!
I've had that one for awile and think I've mentioned it before, but....
Yep, she's a beaut... Its an Advanced Micro Devices Am2901 Evaluation and
Learning Kit. It's basicly a complete front panel board with the cpu and
everything.. It works. It has 3 nibbles of LEDs (for data display,
pipeline register, and microword memory) and toggles for address, data,
ram/mux select, run, load, and single-stepping.
;)
- Mike: dogas(a)leading.net
"Careful Al,
You never know who's on the list server."
I figured you'd probably be here, but since you didn't post that
the stuff was available..
"No, pinhead, you give me a price, and I say 'yes' or 'no' to it..."
Did I say this was about you?
>At 04:37 26-02-2000 EST, a few wrote:
>
>>> I went into a surplus store today and found a complete set of HP logic
>>> probes, pulser, chip clip and comparator. I asked what the price was
and
>>> the onwer ran over to his computer and checked to see what they were
>>> selling for on E-bay. Needless to say, I left without buying it.
Yeah, I was there and pretty appaled too. Especially having to wait on the
owner's cheesy computer and connection speed to get the price quote. ;)
The scary thing is that this is where the Univac is and a resuce may entail
a purchase at Ebay's street price... LOL!
> They do turn up. Just be aware that there was a nearly identical model to
>the 545 that was only for ECL circuits, and the physical appearance
>(outside of the model number) is no different.
545A and 10525T probes came with my first 5036A trainer.
;)
- Mike
" Based on my conversations with him, I don't think he's
interested in selling anything off of E-bay"
My 'favorite' line from eBay sellers is
"If you're interested in something, let me know and I'll list
it on eBay"
No, pinhead, you give me a price, and I say 'yes' or 'no' to it...
Hmm... How big are we talking here?
-- Tony
> ----------
> From: Mike[SMTP:dogas@leading.net]
> Reply To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org
> Sent: Friday, February 25, 2000 9:08 PM
> To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org
> Subject: Re: A classic classiccmp day...
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Eros, Anthony <Anthony.Eros(a)compaq.com>
>
>
> >Where's the UNIVAC? Is there any possibility of a rescue on it?
> >
>
> It's almost in Orlando, FL. I'd probably be available to help in a
> rescue
> attempt... ;)
>
> - Mike: dogas(a)leading.net
>
>
-----Original Message-----
From: Eros, Anthony <Anthony.Eros(a)compaq.com>
>Where's the UNIVAC? Is there any possibility of a rescue on it?
>
It's almost in Orlando, FL. I'd probably be available to help in a rescue
attempt... ;)
- Mike: dogas(a)leading.net
Hi everyone,
What a cool day. I woke up to a beautiful Florida morning and hopped in
the car and drove to Orlando and met Joe to 'hit the spots' (Thanks for
comming out to play, Joe!)
One stop yielded a Motorola EXORcisor chassis(woo hoo!), two ASR-32's with
tape r/w er's , and a 20 slot crate based on a General Micro Systems
6502/6802/6809/z80 sbc/card (currently with the 6809 module installed. It
has ports for pinter, i/o, rs232, and ieee-488) from circa 83 maybe...with
other cards including a Smoke Signal Broadcasting DCB-4E, a Digalog Systems
64k mem,. a Digalog Systems T Buss Controller, and a few other ufo's.
Anyone know anything about this one?
Also obtained on the trip: a pdp 11/05 that has the front panel, an ICE
sytem for Intel's 960/20, several boards with memory and a few with some
Am2901 processors, and a Fourth Cartridge (and entire setup) for a Commie
64.
I saw alot of interesting things that didn't come home with me (...yet...
;)) letsee.... The coolest was probably the Univac 1540. Never seen one
before, it had a lot of dings but *GREAT* front panallage and full
headdress. Wish someone would save that one. Something else I almost
picked up was an Intel GUIO MCS-51 thingy that I'm sure will cause regret in
time.
Well, guess I'll go play...
;)
- Mike: dogas(a)leading.net
Where's the UNIVAC? Is there any possibility of a rescue on it?
-- Tony
> ----------
> From: Mike[SMTP:dogas@leading.net]
> Reply To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org
> Sent: Friday, February 25, 2000 7:48 PM
> To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org
> Subject: A classic classiccmp day...
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> What a cool day. I woke up to a beautiful Florida morning and hopped in
> the car and drove to Orlando and met Joe to 'hit the spots' (Thanks for
> comming out to play, Joe!)
>
> One stop yielded a Motorola EXORcisor chassis(woo hoo!), two ASR-32's
> with
> tape r/w er's , and a 20 slot crate based on a General Micro Systems
> 6502/6802/6809/z80 sbc/card (currently with the 6809 module installed. It
> has ports for pinter, i/o, rs232, and ieee-488) from circa 83
> maybe...with
> other cards including a Smoke Signal Broadcasting DCB-4E, a Digalog
> Systems
> 64k mem,. a Digalog Systems T Buss Controller, and a few other ufo's.
> Anyone know anything about this one?
>
> Also obtained on the trip: a pdp 11/05 that has the front panel, an ICE
> sytem for Intel's 960/20, several boards with memory and a few with some
> Am2901 processors, and a Fourth Cartridge (and entire setup) for a Commie
> 64.
>
> I saw alot of interesting things that didn't come home with me (...yet...
> ;)) letsee.... The coolest was probably the Univac 1540. Never seen one
> before, it had a lot of dings but *GREAT* front panallage and full
> headdress. Wish someone would save that one. Something else I almost
> picked up was an Intel GUIO MCS-51 thingy that I'm sure will cause regret
> in
> time.
>
> Well, guess I'll go play...
>
> ;)
> - Mike: dogas(a)leading.net
>
>
>
>
<Hmm, all this talk about anti-spam stuff and then suddenly "poof" I don't
<hear anything for hours. Wondering what happened....
<--Chuck
Donno.
Allison
>Stopped by the scrapper today and found this: IBM 3742 Dual Data Station.
>There's not much left of it, so I grabbed the little nametag off it for my
>archaic weird stuff to decorate the walls collection, but I'm curious what
>it is.
There may not be left of that particular unit, but the IBM 3740 series
(of which the 3742 is a variant) lives on today in every PC clone.
> The only thing I could find (in German, no less) was a mention from
>1975 about it having something to do with 8" disks and System/32.
In particular, every PC-clone uses a floppy disk format that's a very
direct descendant of the IBM 3740 format. Change the modulation from
FM to MFM, up the data rate, and that's all. And at least some of the
PC FDC's will read a IBM 3740 format floppy (see the discussions from
the past few years in comp.os.cpm about single-density capable
FDC's).
--
Tim Shoppa Email: shoppa(a)trailing-edge.com
Trailing Edge Technology WWW: http://www.trailing-edge.com/
7328 Bradley Blvd Voice: 301-767-5917
Bethesda, MD, USA 20817 Fax: 301-767-5927
In a message dated 2/25/2000 1:10:07 AM Pacific Standard Time,
rhudson(a)ix.netcom.com writes:
> 1 CRT (which was
> displayed in two displays with a mirror arrangement). the two users would
> sit
> facing each other with the floppy drive on the right for each. Each with
> their
> own keyboard.
I stand corrected. This is true. One monitor with mirrors to two displays. It
has been a long time. It was made by IBM.
Paxton
In a message dated 2/24/2000 8:55:15 PM Pacific Standard Time,
xds_sigma7(a)hotmail.com writes:
> IBM 3742 Dual Data Station.
1975 about it having something to do with 8" disks and System/32.
A classic example of a huge plastic data entry workstation that resembled a
desk for two operators with a couple of small IBM boards in it. 150 pounds of
non recyclable plastic, IIRC. Two small 9"? mono monitors & two keyboards for
two operators to enter data. Two original IBM 8" disk drives. It has been 10
years since I have seen one so I hope my memory is correct.
It was a small business data entry station that could be better done with two
terminals. I believe it could be used with the System one besides the /32. I
also think you could hook up a printer directly.
IBM made things large because it was expected of them. After all in 1975 it
couldn't be a real computer peripheral or worth big bucks if it wasn't large.
Very poor scrap. 60 Cubic feet of plastic garbage. It definitely is a
collectable if complete and you have space for it. I doubt many were saved.
The chassis stuck around because 4 of them would fill a dumpster.
Paxton
Hi,
Stopped by the scrapper today and found this: IBM 3742 Dual Data Station.
There's not much left of it, so I grabbed the little nametag off it for my
archaic weird stuff to decorate the walls collection, but I'm curious what
it is. The only thing I could find (in German, no less) was a mention from
1975 about it having something to do with 8" disks and System/32.
Will J
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
Greetings;
We have recently made changes to our mail servers here that may possibly
affect some list users. In our ongoing effort to limit SPAM, our mail
servers were recently configured to utilitize the MAPS RBL, DUL, and RSS
databases (see www.mail-abuse.org for details).
Entities that send spam typically make use of mail servers that are
improperly configured in such a way as to allow relaying (ie. they are "open
relays"). This means that these problem mail servers are often used to
bounce mail off of and redistribute spam. Our mail servers have been
configured to properly reject mail that is neither from or to a "local"
address for many years. However, if our users (or any domains we host,
including classiccmp.org) are on the spammers mailing list we have not been
able to reject that spam in the past because the target address was both
valid and local. By utilizing MAPS, any inbound mail is checked to see if it
originated from a system or network that is known to be an open relay - if
so, the message is rejected. Thus not only are we not an open relay, but we
will refuse to accept or send mail that is from or to any system that is an
open relay. That is the function of RBL and RSS; DUL is a blacklist of
non-open relays that are however known originators of spam.
You can check the above URL for details, but the basic gist is that when
anyone on the internet receives junk mail via an open relay, they can submit
the open relay's IP address to the MAPS database. The MAPS folks will test
the server and if problematic they'll contact the administrator for that
system and ask them to fix their open relay. If they do not fix the system
within 5 days, they are added to the maps database. Once the administrator
fixes the open relay their system is retested by MAPS and if compliant it is
removed from the database. Our mail servers will not accept mail from or
deliver mail to any system in the MAPS database. You can tell if you've
encountered this by your message being returned to you with a note clearly
stating that your message was rejected due to RBL, DUL, or open-relays.
As you may gather, this does open the possibility of "throwing the baby out
with the bath water". If your ISP has an open relay, we will not accept your
mail. In this case you need to call your ISP and ask them to fix their mail
server security deficiency. If one of your ISP's other customers is a source
of spam, it is somewhat possible your ISP will be blocked (which albeit
unfairly blocks you). This generally isn't much of a problem because most
ISP's are very responsive to requests from MAPS. After weighing these issues
we decided that there's no reason that our servers should have to converse
with other servers that are known to be insecure or frequent sources of
spam. We really really really dislike spam, and feel that this action is
wholly appropriate.
Regards,
Jay West
Here is someone with a bunch of classic to semi-classic software for sale.
Please reply to the original sender.
Reply-to: urdahl(a)telus.net
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2000 14:08:00 -0800
From: Hans and Sharon Urdahl <urdahl(a)telus.net>
To: vcf(a)vintage.org
Subject: Software for sale
Could you please let me know if there is a internet site where I could
list these items Thank you.
Inventory list of software: Quantity:
Packard Bell MS-Dos 4.0 OPERATING 3 1
Combase (c) 1987 Data base communications inc. 8 New
Tandy 1000 Cat.no.25-1504 technical referenc manual 1
Tandy 1000 Cat.no.25-1501 MS-Dos reference manual 5
Packard Bell MS-Dos 4.0 SHELL 1
SVGV-UTILITY (disk 1&2) 5" floppy 1
Racal Interlan, Diags and drives for ni 5210 ver 2.0
contains 158-0248-00 24 New
Poly-XFR CP/M Comms communications for Rainbow 100 2
VISI CALC.instantly calulates elec.work sheet
user's guide for APPLE II&II plus 48k 16 sector 3
AccPac. Accouts receivable 10
AccPac. Accounts payable 8
AccPac. General ledger and financing report 3
Zenith data systems Heath software 3
Olivetti software libary STK 286 5 new
Olivetti MS-Dos pc 286 10 new
Microsoft M Basic 86 basic interpreter for rainbow 100 4
Rainbow 100 cp/m-86/80 operating system 1
Rainbow 100 user kit 1
Diskette drive head cleaning kit FD-08 Series 2024 5 new
Irish 5" floppy 1
Micom Philips 8" floppy 380
Flexible disk caddy for 8" floppy 33
Come Base user guide communication program for IBM PC 2
Packard Bell Modem 2400 BPS reference manual 2
Sellam International Man of Intrigue and Danger
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Looking for a six in a pile of nines...
VCF Europe: April 29th & 30th, Munich, Germany
VCF Los Angeles: Summer 2000 (*TENTATIVE*)
VCF East: Planning in Progress
See http://www.vintage.org for details!
<> with a seven deadly dirty words it was a risk to us as well. So it was a
<> condition of service or else...
<
<If you were a Common Carrier, the material transmitted by your customers
<would not be your problem. If you had to police it, you were NOT a
<Common Carrier.
In the radio biz during the early 70s FCC was as powerful as IRS and
equally inclined to take actions as they saw fit. THe only one that
Had official common carrier back then was TPC (The Telephone Company)
Loosing a license for a repeater could mean a lot of lost business.
The profit was from service contracts on the users as the repeater was
not a profit mechanism. This may have changed in the last 20 years.
So no law said so but I did use the word civil penelty. Also other
customers hearing the bad stuff on the repeater (despite PL tone)
often did complain.
Allison