It could also be from the popular article about George RR Martin using a vintage dos computer with wordstar 4.0 for his writing rig. Similar to some other authors I've heard look for a machine that doesn't offer distractions.
My own mis-remembrance though for some reason I thought it was a trs-80 model 4p but I'm not finding specifics in the quick google search.
-------- Original message --------From: Evan Koblentz via cctalk <cctalk at classiccmp.org> Date: 10/30/17 2:47 PM (GMT-06:00) To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts" <cctalk at classiccmp.org> Subject: Re: looking at buying a pocket PC / PDA
> Radio Shack M100 ... still used by some writers for the very reason you mention.
That is not true.
It was an urban legend in the 1990s that a handful of old farts in the
entirely sportswriting industry (thousands of writers overall) may
"still" be using their Model 100s. I'm sure if you looked hard enough
some of them still used typewriters too.
In 2017? It's ridiculous to even speculate.
Jim I thought all TI computers had one? But I am new to TI's never
owned one when were new... just dealing with one in a museum
environment now.
In a message dated 10/30/2017 8:25:17 P.M. US Mountain Standard Time,
cctalk at classiccmp.org writes:
On 10/30/2017 9:32 PM, Ed via cctalk wrote:
> ok .. does this mean I can put lots of ti 99/4 software on the sd
> card for people to play with in the museum?
> Ed#
Do you have a HexBus interface for the 99/4a?
I thought all of them had it?
Hey all, I've been doing research on Multics front panels, which it turns out
are slightly different from those on the Honeywell 6000 series machines which
ran GCOS, and are often confused with them.
So, I've put together a Web page about them:
Multics and Related 6000 Series Front Panels
http://ana-3.lcs.mit.edu/~jnc/tech/multics/MulticsPanels.html
and I've taken some new images, so make sure the captions are all readable.
I'm having an issue with the images, though: taking a picture of a flat,
rectangular panel with a camera usually produces distortion (even with the
lens set to the narrowest angle possible).
Does anyone know of any freeware which will fix this? The image tool I
normally use (ImagePals, sort of a poor man's Photoshop) does have a 'warp'
function, but it requires setting up a grid of points, and is a pain to use:
optimal would be something where you mark the 4 corners, and few intermediate
edge points, and the image is automagically fixed.
I did find this:
http://guides.library.illinois.edu/c.php?g=347882&p=2345440
but it's even hairier than the warp function in my image tool; it's very
powerful (and thus complex, sigh) and can straigten out badly warped old book
pages.
I'm hoping there's a simpler tool, for the simple case of distortion of
rectangles by a lens - does anyone know of anything?
Thanks!
Noel
ok .. does this mean I can put lots of ti 99/4 software on the sd
card for people to play with in the museum?
Ed#
In a message dated 10/30/2017 7:06:33 P.M. US Mountain Standard Time,
cctalk at classiccmp.org writes:
On Sun, 29 Oct 2017 12:14:41 -0500
Jim Brain via cctalk <cctalk at classiccmp.org> wrote:
> In case anyone has a fondness for niche tech...
>
> At VCF-SE this year, the TI folks had a great exhibit, and perusing
> it I saw an unfamiliar machine, the TI CC-40 (Compact Computer-40).
> While I was investigating, the exhibitor (MillipedeMan aka Mark),
> told me the machines were frustrating to use, as TI only supported
> one communications method on the unit, a proprietary protocol called
> HexBus, and produced very low quantities of very few peripherals that
> work on the bus. Most frustratingly, they never producing a mass
> storage device in any appreciable quantity, and there was no other
> way to save programs written on the unit.
>
> Mark did note there was an eBay seller liquidating units, so I bought
> a 2 unit combo from eBay before I left the show.
>
> Sadly, Summer happened, but I was finally able to get to the unit,
> and started working on an SD-based mass storage device for the unit.
> It was an interesting journey to learn a new protocol.
>
> The (development in progress) result is HEX-TI-r, the HexBus SD drive:
>
> GitHub source code is here: https://github.com/go4retro/HEXTIr
>
> Video of unit operating: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LX5ahVCRdvM
>
> I don't have a project page up yet, but will work on that.
>
> Jim
>
Nice work, Jim. Thanks for the effort you've put into this.
jbdigriz
In case anyone has a fondness for niche tech...
At VCF-SE this year, the TI folks had a great exhibit, and perusing it I
saw an unfamiliar machine, the TI CC-40 (Compact Computer-40).? While I
was investigating, the exhibitor (MillipedeMan aka Mark), told me the
machines were frustrating to use, as TI only supported one
communications method on the unit, a proprietary protocol called HexBus,
and produced very low quantities of very few peripherals that work on
the bus. Most frustratingly, they never producing a mass storage device
in any appreciable quantity, and there was no other way to save programs
written on the unit.
Mark did note there was an eBay seller liquidating units, so I bought a
2 unit combo from eBay before I left the show.
Sadly, Summer happened, but I was finally able to get to the unit, and
started working on an SD-based mass storage device for the unit.? It was
an interesting journey to learn a new protocol.
The (development in progress) result is HEX-TI-r, the HexBus SD drive:
GitHub source code is here: https://github.com/go4retro/HEXTIr
Video of unit operating: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LX5ahVCRdvM
I don't have a project page up yet, but will work on that.
Jim
--
Jim Brain
brain at jbrain.comwww.jbrain.com
From: Paul Koning
Sent: Friday, October 27, 2017 12:07 PM
> True if you have a TTL machine. 6600 is discrete transistor, and the actual
> transistor specs are nowhere to be found as far as I have been able to tell.
> But that doesn't directly relate to gate level emulation. If you have gate
> level documentation you can of course build a copy of the machine out of
> actual gate-type parts, like 7400 chips. Or you can write a gate level model
> in VHDL, which is not the most popular form but certainly perfectly
> straightforward. Either way, though, you have to start with a document that
> shows what the gates are in the original and how they connect. And to get it
> to work, you need to deal with timing issues and logic abuse, if present. In
> the 6600, both are very present and very critical. For example, I've been
> debugging a section (the central processor branch logic) where the behavior
> changes quite substantially depending on whether you favor S or R in an R/S
> flop, i.e., if both are asserted at the same time, who wins? And the circuit
> and wire delays matter, down to the few-nanosecond level.
Paul,
I asked the Principal Engineer here, who has spent the last 3 years making our
6500 run, about transistors in the 6000 series. He replied:
Near as I can tell, the 6500 uses 2n2369 transistors in a slightly shorter
version of the to-18 package. I have had good success with both the 2n2369
for replacements, and mmbt2369 for the modules I have re-manufactured.
Since the flip-flops are merely cross coupled transistors, if they are both
set at once, both outputs will be true. In my experience, the set and reset
run on different phases of the clock, so that doesn't happen.
What you see on the logic diagrams can be interpreted this way: Each arrow
is a transistor, with the emitter tied to ground. The base usually has
about a 150 ohm resistor. The circle or square is the collector pull-up
resistor, so in the example of the PC module in 1n15 of the 6500, there are
two gates that can set flip-flop 0, and they come in on transistor 15, and
17, and the other side of the flip-flop comes in on transistor 19. All
three transistor collectors are connected together to 1 pull-up. If the
output pin does not go anywhere internal to the card, there will be a 120
ohm resistor in series with a diode to ground on it. If it does go
somewhere internal to the card, they will leave off the resistor/diode, as
the load will provide it.
Hope that helps.
Rich
Rich Alderson
Vintage Computing Sr. Systems Engineer
Living Computers: Museum + Labs
2245 1st Avenue S
Seattle, WA 98134
mailto:RichA at LivingComputers.orghttp://www.LivingComputers.org/
On Oct 29, 2017 09:54, "Dave Wade via cctalk" <cctalk at classiccmp.org> wrote:
I am not sure they invented computer emulation. I think that the concept
Emulation/Simulation is as old as, or perhaps even older than computing.
Whilst it was a pure concept Alan Turing's "Universal Turing Machine" was a
Turing machine that could emulate or simulate the behaviour of any arbitrary
Turing machine...
1. Did Turing use the word "emulate"? I honestly have no idea. My (possibly
wrong) impression was that no published literature used the word emulate
with that meaning (one computer emulating another) before the IBM papers.
2. What a UTM does is simulate another machine using only a general-purpose
machine. In fact, the UTM is arguably the most general-purpose machine ever
described. What IBM defined as emulation was use of extremely specialized
hardware and/or microcode (specifically, not the machine's general-purpose
microcode used for natively programming the host machine). If anyone else
did _that_ in a product before IBM, I'm very interested.
I've acquired a Multi-Tech FM300 acoustic modem and even though I could
figure out the pin-outs
and switch settings, it would be great if I could get a copy of the
original manual.
Goal is to add it to a Teletype 33 or 35 and a Bell System 500 desk set.
-pete
I am now looking at the H7826 PSU that came with a TURBOchannel Extender. It
looks like there may have been capacitor leakage and some heatsinks will
need to be replaced. I have posted pictures here:
https://robs-old-computers.com/2017/10/23/corroded-h7826-power-supply/
So two questions:
1. Any suggestion on how to clean the board? Some of the corners are a
bit inaccessible to reach with just a cotton bud and isopropyl.
2. Do those heat sinks have a particular name/spec that I can search
for?
Thanks
Rob
Lars Brinkhoff wrote:
> Jon Elson wrote:
> > I'm not sure the original DEC PDP-10 (KA-10) used microcode, but the
> > KI-10 did.
>
> As far as I understand, the PDP-6 (type 166), KA10, and KI10 were
> hardwired. KL10 and KS10 were microcoded. The Foonly F1 preceeded and
> influenced the KL10 design.
This is exactly correct.
BTW: they still are...
--Johnny
I recently picked up a job at an electronic recycling center. Harris
is right around the corner from us, as well as a bunch of technical
schools and aerospace related businesses. All of thier old stuff ends
up at the shop to be resold as surplus or broken down and scrapped.
There tends to be to much to process, and inside space is limited.
Excess equipment is stored outside in tents, and it goes to crap quite
quickly unfortunately. The humidity and rain destroys stuff outside
quickly. I am uncertain of how many requests I will get, but if anyone
is looking for something in particular, please send me an email and I
will keep an eye out for you. The place is a goldmine, and a lot of
nice older gear is going to waste because the store owners do not know
what it is.
Examples of stuff that comes in are old microcomputers like the c64,
nice 486 like machines with good isa cards in them, TONS of HP and
tectronics test equipment, ham radio gear, you name it.
There is a ton of good stuff here, i am trying to find some a good
home before it gets stripped out.
Some of this stuff works fine, the tandy 1000 computer I picked up
this weekend works flawlessly for example. Other things are in a
broken or parts state, but within reach of repair. There is a lot of
new gear there as well, not many machines come in with nice graphics
cards in them, but tons of workstations with lots of ram and hard
drives are common. We get so many servers they are broken down almost
immediately unless they are particularly new or unique in some way.
Lets see how busy my inbox gets, if you are in need of something,
please send me an email, i can keep an eye out for it and hopefully be
of service.I work on Saturdays, that is the day i will be on site to
look for things.
Stuff will be priced as surplus/used. Hopefully i can be of use and
keep some of this stuff out of the scrap pile.
--Devin
And I found the Columbia.plt HPGL I believe I generated using the method below. Sending directly to Mike.
Marc
-----Original Message-----
From: CuriousMarc [mailto:curiousmarc3 at gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, October 29, 2017 6:16 PM
To: 'Mike Stein'; 'General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts'
Subject: RE: HPGL plotter art files
The space shuttle comes from a .dwg that was included in an version of AutoCAD, the file is named Columbia.dwg if you want to search it on Google. I can send you the original .dwg file if you want. Then you need to use AutoCAD to print out an HPGL file. I used Autodesk DWG TrueView which is free. You'll need to spin it around in 3D until you get a top view, then zoom to it. Then I printed it from TrueView using Roland DXY 880 output with the following options: A4 paper, landscape orientation, print to file, center, print extent. Out will come an HPGL file that you might want to further massage depending how early or late your plotter is, as was said by Brent.
Marc
-----Original Message-----
From: cctalk [mailto:cctalk-bounces at classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of tom sparks via cctalk
Sent: Sunday, October 15, 2017 11:36 PM
To: cctalk at classiccmp.org
Subject: Re: HPGL plotter art files
On 16/10/17 15:07, David Collins via cctalk wrote:
> Brent could you send it to curator at hpmuseum.net as well?
>
> Thanks!
>
> David Collins
>
>> On 16 Oct 2017, at 2:32 pm, Brent Hilpert via cctalk <cctalk at classiccmp.org> wrote:
>>
>>> On 2017-Oct-15, at 4:20 PM, Mike Stein via cctalk wrote:
>>> Can anybody direct me to some interesting HPGL plotter files for a display at the upcoming World of Commodore show?
>>
>> I'm sending (in a separate, direct message with attachment) the semi-famous / once ubiquitous Space Shuttle plot from the 1980s.
>>
>> I received it from someone after making a similar request to the list 10 years ago.
>>
>> Some things to note though: this plot uses multiple colored pens and was scaled to some (largish, IIRC) size of paper.
>> I was targetting a HP 9872 plotter which was too early to understand some of the more complex HPGL directives present in the SS plot, such as drawing arcs.
>> I wrote a language filter/converter that will optionally scale the image, offset it relative to the plotter bed, converts certain directives e.g. arcs to a series of line-segment directives, reduces the number of pens, etc.
>>
>> I'll send the original SS plot, if you figure you could use the filter program, I can send it along, or a modified plot, upon request.
>>
inkscape has hpgl export support
[Chiplotle](http://cmc.music.columbia.edu/chiplotle/) gives you a python API these is also [tsp art](http://wiki.evilmadscientist.com/TSP_art) witch can drawn on plotter
tom
I'll add a few more problem specs than answers but the down side of a lot of devices is lack of backlit screen so working in a dark space can be a problem, and I'd be quite interested to see real battery life reviews.?
?So many devices that can work only last a few hours on battery. Could be age issues but that's what I've accepted as a reason not to collect too many handheld devices. Proprietary batteries and most are dead.
Do you want keyboard or is palm like writing acceptable? On the bright side, despite battery age palms are easy to find and relatively cheap. Most are at goodwill because of obsolescence not because theyre broken.? I find them all the time for $10.
null
Anyone in the list has a copy of PowerPrint 2.5.2 from GDT Software? It's a
collection of printer drivers for the Mac for non-Apple printers that works
under System 6.0.7. I am particularly looking at a driver for an HP 2225D
(the serial version of the ThinkJet). It is said that GDT had a one.
Marc
I picked up a tandy 1000 TX with a color CM 11 monitor. Both are in
the original boxes with keyboard,monitor and the printer cable. It
powers on but i can not seem to get it to boot from the floppy drive.
Ive tried writing 720K boot disks from my windows computer but it is
still not booting. Some better pictures to follow soon.
I do not particularly need such a machine, and am open to trade or
offers. If no one wants it perhaps it can be put to use as a BBS or
something packet radio related over here. Also, the boxes both had us
goverment stickers on them, kinda intersting.
https://s20.postimg.org/fr7iox7kt/image3.jpg
--Devin
Hello Steve,
Found ur post re: a copy DDJ DVD 6. Wondering if u ever got a response.
Also, I'm looking for an archive of Computer Language. If u know where one
is at be greatful if u can pass along the info.
--
Joe Seiwert III
jseiwert07 at berkeley.columbia.eduhttp://www.linkedin.com/in/jseiwert
I'd second the Z88. A lot of people get put off by the keyboard but it
actually works really well, and I'm a proper mechanical keyboard snob. You
get can a proper turn of speed up on it.
Mark
On 29 Oct 2017 4:04 p.m., "Lawrence Woodman via cctalk" <
cctalk at classiccmp.org> wrote:
On 29/10/17 15:22, Mike Stein via cctalk wrote:
> Radio Shack M100 (if you've got a large pocket); still used by some
> writers for the very reason you mention.
>
> m
>
> On 29/10/17 06:01, Evan Koblentz wrote:
>
>> I am looking at buying a pocket PC / PDA, so I can write idea/notes
>>>>> when I
>>>>> am away from my computer
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
I was also thinking of something a little bit bigger, such as the M100.
The Cambridge Z88 is an excellent machine and they are still being sold new
in box.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cambridge_Z88
Lorry
Hi, Emanuel,
I have a quantity of 4164 DRAM from the Comboard days, new in tube. It is
likely to mostly be 150ns and I don't know the brands until I dig it out,
but I will check when I get home. If it matches what you need, I'm happy
to send some to you.
-ethan
On Oct 28, 2017 12:32, "emanuel stiebler via cctalk" <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
wrote:
Hi all,
anybody has some spare in the bin, he doesn't need?
Looking for 18 pieces, preferably NEC, -12.
Thanks!
I was just wasting time with TVTropes and, on the page
http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/FandomBerserkButton, came
across this quote:
The editor of one early (late 1970s) British computer magazine
persistently claimed that the difference between compilers and
interpreters was "academic", even in the face of corrections from
knowledgeable readers, until one month he learned the hard way just
how wrong he was, by wasting three pages of the mag on a worthless
hex-dump of the workspace of a BASIC interpreter. The mag didn't
last very much longer after that issue.
Does anyone know what magazine this was? I'm not sure I understand what
the hex dump thing is all about.
--
Eric Christopherson
Hi Noel -
http://www.dvq.com/
is the master site it seems..
I goggled dvg and dec as it said it was copyrighted dvg I
figured that would show up elsewhere and it did.
Ed# _www.smecc.org_ (http://www.smecc.org)
In a message dated 10/28/2017 5:43:37 A.M. US Mountain Standard Time,
cctalk at classiccmp.org writes:
Does anyone know who does this site:
http://decmuseum.org/index.html
I looked, and didn't see anything in the site itself, and doing a 'whois'
didn't turn up anything useful.
The site has some really nice PDP-5 photos which I was wondering if that
person could/would put in the public domain, so I can use them for a PDP-5
article I'm working on for Wikipedia and the CHWiki. So I'd like to get in
contact with them.
Noel
Does anyone know who does this site:
http://decmuseum.org/index.html
I looked, and didn't see anything in the site itself, and doing a 'whois'
didn't turn up anything useful.
The site has some really nice PDP-5 photos which I was wondering if that
person could/would put in the public domain, so I can use them for a PDP-5
article I'm working on for Wikipedia and the CHWiki. So I'd like to get in
contact with them.
Noel
On Sat, Oct 28, 2017 at 1:42 PM, Paul Birkel <pbirkel at gmail.com> wrote:
> Are you sure that you're not looking at a local cache?
It doesn't look like a local cache to me:
tingo at kg-core1$ curl http://pdp8.org/ | head
% Total % Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Time Time Current
Dload Upload Total Spent Left Speed
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 --:--:-- --:--:--
--:--:-- 0<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01
Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type"
content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1">
<meta name="POSTINFO" content="http://www.pdp-8.org/postinfo.txt">
<meta name="ProgId" content="FrontPage.Editor.Document">
<meta name="keywords" content="pdp8, pdp12, pdp-8, pdp-12, linc">
<meta name="GENERATOR" content="Microsoft FrontPage 4.0">
<title>PDP-8.org: a PDP-8 and PDP-12 resource</title>
100 8656 100 8656 0 0 8656 0 0:00:01 --:--:-- 0:00:01 30265
curl: (23) Failed writing body (0 != 1603)
and
tingo at kg-core1$ host pdp8.orgpdp8.org has address 216.99.193.149
pdp8.org mail is handled by 10 mx.spiritone.com.
tingo at kg-core1$ ping pdp8.org
PING pdp8.org (216.99.193.149): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 216.99.193.149: icmp_seq=0 ttl=55 time=139.792 ms
64 bytes from 216.99.193.149: icmp_seq=1 ttl=55 time=140.435 ms
^C
--- pdp8.org ping statistics ---
2 packets transmitted, 2 packets received, 0.0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 139.792/140.113/140.435/0.322 ms
HTH
--
Regards,
Torfinn Ingolfsen
On 10/27/2017 01:01 PM, Paul Koning wrote:
> Oh yes, and if you look at the wire lists (on Bitsavers) you will get the length of every wire in the machine. The trouble is that, even if you use the documented delay per foot, things don't necessarily match. The stated logic stage delay is 5 ns, no special numbers given for twisted pair drivers. In my model, I do everything in 5 ns multiples (to keep the simulation time under control). That works pretty closely, but not 100 percent, not for some of the CPU pieces. The other thing that's nuts is that the CPU effectively has a 20-phase clock: the documentation shows clock signals with offsets from the reference time given in multiples of 5 nanoseconds (for the 100 ns clock period). And yes, it matters. And yes, many (I'm not sure about all) of the 20 phases are actually used in the CPU.
I can't recall, but didn't the 6600 have something like 10 clock
sources, all kept synchronized?
In any case, it's a gross oversimplification to say that the 6600 had a
10 MHz clock.
--Chuck
Folks,
I have an Apple II that produces one beep at power on, but my monitor says
"no video present". A scope on the output shows frame sync but at low
levels. The odd thing is that ic A9 appears to be a 74S151 not a 74LS151. I
wouldn't expect this to work, but I assume it was working at some point in
time!
I have done some googling and can't see any reference to this substitution.
Is it something any one else has seen?
Dave Wade
> From: "Rob Jarratt"
> I misread your email as suggesting that the 124 was more suitable than
> the 122
No, it's just cheaper (at the moment), and can be made to work.
> My H960 is not very accessible but I attempted to measure it front back
> and it may be 25". Do you know where should the length be measured?
You don't need to measure anything. The C-230-S-122 is the _exact_ part DEC
used originally for mounting RK05's in H960's.
Noel
Hello,
I've been trying to unsubscribe from the list. I did it once before and
hadn't seen anything for months. However, I suddenly started receiving
mails last weekend. I went to the webpage to unsubscribe but I can't login
and neither the password reset or unsubscribe confirmation make it to me.
So I'm hoping someone can tell me how to contact the list admin. I emailed
an address I found on the website but I hadn't received a response yet. I
may not have waited long enough but I don't know.
Cheers,
Mike
> From: Kip Koon
> I tend to get emulation and simulation a bit confused.
You and me both!
I think part of the problem is that there is no generally-agreed-upon
definition of the two terms.
I like this one a lot, though:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/1584617/simulator-or-emulator-what-is-t…
Emulation is the process of mimicking the outwardly observable behavior to
match an existing target. The internal state of the emulation mechanism
does not have to accurately reflect the internal state of the target which
it is emulating.
Simulation, on the other hand, involves modeling the underlying state of
the target. The end result of a good simulation is that the simulation
model will emulate the target which it is simulating.
Ideally, you should be able to look into the simulation and observe
properties that you would also see if you looked into the original target.
In practice, there may some shortcuts to the simulation for performance
reasons -- that is, some internal aspects of the simulation may actually be
an emulation.
...
EDIT: Other responses have pointed out that the goal of an emulation is to
able to substitute for the object it is emulating. That's an important
point. A simulation's focus is more on the modelling of the internal state
of the target - and the simulation does not necessarily lead to emulation.
... SPICE, for example, cannot substitue for an actual electronics circuit
There's also the question of what's being emulated.
Ersatz-11, for example, does a good job of looking like a PDP-11 - for the
software. However, it does not like a PDP-11 for the hardware (although John
used to sell boards you could plug into a PC, which provided a QBUS, IIRC).
So is it a simulator or an emulator? Good question.
About the only _generally-agreed_ example of the terminology I can think of
are 'in-circuit emulators', which _exactly_ match the behaviour of a given
chip.
Noel
> From: "Rob Jarratt"
> Thanks for this info Noel.
Sure; I figured it would be useful to someone, glad to know it was.
> So it sounds like I would need the C-230-S-124. ... My metalworking
> abilities are limited.
If you don't want to have to do any mods, the C-230-S-122 is a straight
bolt-in, albeit $30 or so more than the -124, which requires..
> I am not clear from the picture you linked to, what the modification is?
Drilling the two holes.
Noel
So, you have an RK05 drive, but you're missing the slides to mount it?
Your troubles are over (sort of :-).
It turns out the slide DEC used was the General Devices 'Chassis Trak'
C-230-S-122 (22") - and those are still available (e.g. from Newark). They're
somewhat pricey - the -124 (24") is slightly cheaper, and can easily be
modified to fit an H960, viz:
http://ana-3.lcs.mit.edu/~jnc/tech/jpg/24InchSlide.jpg
The one in the image actually came off an -11/05 in a 10-1/2" box; the 3-3/8"
outer slide pair from the RK05 slides does in fact fit the inner slides (i.e.
the part permanently fixed to the box) used on a lot of BA11 boxes.
One hitch: the location of the safety latches (the 'buttons' on the inner
slides that pop out through holes in the intermediate slides) is different on
most of the BA11-K inners (on the three BA11-F's I've looked at, they do
match), and so the latches don't work. (Unless of course you make the correct
hole in the intermediates, or drill new holes in the inners that come with the
slide set, to match the mounting holes on the BA11-K, and use them instead.)
So, better than nothing, if you have BA11's (or similar) and don't have the
outer slides, to mount them.
Noel
The old extended/expanded memory manager for DOS. Anyone remember?
I'm playing with bootable USB keys with PC DOS 7 (and DR-DOS 7 to follow).
I have it working and booting now, but I'd like to disable QEMM's
memory check on startup. I'm sure there was a switch, but I can't
remember it. Even with just -- "just" -- 4GB of RAM it takes quite a
while.
If anyone knows of a place where there's a summary of QEMM's
command-line switches, that'd be great. I have found some manuals but
nothing helpful.
I'm using QEMM 9, the last version, for Win9x.
Any suggestions?
--
Liam Proven ? Profile: https://about.me/liamproven
Email: lproven at cix.co.uk ? Google Mail/Talk/Plus: lproven at gmail.com
Twitter/Facebook/Flickr: lproven ? Skype/LinkedIn/AIM/Yahoo: liamproven
UK: +44 7939-087884 ? ?R/WhatsApp/Telegram/Signal: +420 702 829 053
> From: Kip Koon
> I was initially thinking of a strictly software only solution
Whatever you eventually do in the way of hardware, it might be a good idea to
start with this. You can get familiar with whatever OS you decide to go with,
and get used to its tools, get to know the instruction set of that
machine, etc, etc.
So then, if you do do a hardware project, it won't be such a big gulp, and
you'll have the knowledge base covering all the above already there to draw
on.
> which still presents a problem for me and that is which PDP do I teach
> myself and set up.
Probably the way to answer that is, if you're going to build hardware at some
point, a combination of 'what's out there that I can get to talk to', and
'how complicated a beast are we talking about'.
For the first, there's a lot of QBUS stuff around, some UNIBUS, and basically
zilch on the PDP-10 or PDP-15 front. For the second, most -11's (both QBUS
and UNIBUS) are relatively simple and straightforward. Any kind of PDP-10 is
pretty complex (depending on if you emulate the original busses, or not).
> 3rd, and this is a big factor in the choice of DEC PDP computer to pick
> for simulation or emulation and that is the small cash flow and itty
> bitty storage space I have available to me.
Noted.
> The choice so far it seems is the PDP-11/70.
If all you're doing is simulation (software), the -11/70 would be fine. It's
no more work to set up than one of the other timesharing-capable models; it's
only slightly more complicated than say, an -11/45, _from the programmer's
point of view_ (there's a UNIBUS map as well as the usual memory mapping
hardware), but if you're running an existing OS, that should not affect you.
> Remember I still have no idea ... what boards and peripherals
> a PDP-11/70 consists of.
Hardware-wise, the -11/70 could be a complex project - it depends on exactly
how much you try and emulate, a full emulation could be a very complex
undertaking indeed.
The thing is that while the /70 looks to the programmer a lot like one of the
simpler models, the hardware is quite a lot more complicated: there is a
cache, a separate memory bus, high-speed I/I controllers with their own
special bus to the devices (MASSBUS), etc. It's basically an -11/45 with a
bunch of extra stuff glued onto the sides of it to boost the performance; the
board count went from 10 (w/o floating point, which adds an extra 4) to a
minimum of of 16 (w/o FP), plus 4 for each high-speed I/O controller (up to
4).
Now, if all you're doing is emulating the system, _without_ providing any of
the busses, no problem; all that complexity is hidden inside the simulator.
But once you start emulating real busses (i.e. to be able to plug in real
hardware) - whole different kettle of fish.
Noel
> From: Kip Koon
> f I were to have to decide on just one model DEC PDP system to run in a
> DEC Emulator, which one would be the most useful, versatile and has the
> most software available for it?
To echo what others have said, when you say 'emulator', do you mean hardware
(the usual meaning of emulator), or software (which would be a simulator)?
And if you mean hardware, are you going to emulate the bus as well?
Having said that, I think you should ask yourself 'what do you want to do
with it'? The thing is there are a lot of DEC machines which are
'interesting', and have a lot of software available for them: the -8, -10,
11, -15 and VAX (dunno if you consider that a 'PDP') are all in that category.
> I hear a lot about the PDP-11. I found out that there were 16 major PDP
> models at one time so I'm not too sure which one to pick.
They aren't really that different; many of them are more 'the optimal
technology to implement in' changed over the (fairly) long life of the
architecture, so many of models are where an earlier one was replaced by a
more cost-effective equivalent. E.g. for one 'class', the /20 (TTL SSI) was
followed by the /05 (microcoded TTL SSI), and then the /04 (TTL MSI), and then
the /03 (LSI); in another the /40 was followed by the /34 and then the
/23. Etc. There are really only 3 kinds of -11:
- Those without memory management (the /20, etc)
- Those with 'simple' memory management (the /40, etc)
- Those with 'complex' memory management (all the others)
Simple software will run on all three; more complex (e.g. Unix) only on the
latter two.
> Back in the day when Bill Gates and company 1st started out
> ... a B/W photo of a young Bill Gates bending over the operator at what
> looked like a very small computer. Maybe it was just a terminal. I
> don't remember. I understand they did software development on a DEC PDP
> of some sort.
The very earliest version of their BASIC was done on PDP-10's running TOPS-10
- first the one at Harvard, and then some commercial time-sharing system in
the Boston area.
> I have many projects in the works already so I decided to setup a
> software emulation of just one of the DEC PDP models.
OK, so it's going to be just running a simulator?
> I have heard a lot about the PDP-11 which if the information I read is
> correct was 16-bits. in the world... The PDP-11 is the model I hear the
> most about.
Well, for good reason, I think.
It was at one point (1980), the best-selling computer, and really made the
minicomputer (yes, I know the -8 was the first successful mini, but their
size/computing power range was a lot smaller than the -11, and so it didn't
have as widespread a utilization as with the -11).
It's also the machine that Unix was developed on, so if you want to play
around with the 'classic' early Unixes (e.g. Version 6), you'll be wanting
to go with the -11.
Finally, it is to me the finest architecture ever, in terms of elegance, and
bang/buck - the power they squeezed into a 16-bit instruction is pretty
mind-blowing. If you want to see a really elegant design, look at the -11. A
lot of later architectures stole a lot of ideas from the -11.
If you want to go the -11/V6 route, there are instructions for doing
so here:
http://gunkies.org/wiki/Running_Unix_v6_in_SIMHhttp://gunkies.org/wiki/Installing_UNIX_Sixth_Edition_on_Ersatz-11
and I have a very detailed page for doing so with the Ersatz-11 simulator
(which is _very_ fast, and easy to work with), with a lot of useful pre-built
disks, and tools, here:
http://www.chiappa.net/~jnc/tech/V6Unix.html
The other one I would point to as 'interesting' is the PDP-10, _especially_
if you run ITS on it. There's a very complete and detailed page here:
https://www.cosmic.com/u/mirian/its/itsbuild.html
for bringing it up under SIMH. There's also KLH10 as a simulator, which I
know a lot of people like for running ITS; instructions here:
http://its.victor.se/wiki/setup
which has a lot of detail about how to get things running _on_ your ITS once
you have it up.
Please let us know what you decide... :-)
Noel
Here is the latest batch of items up for sale. Full running list with
updates are here:
http://www.vcfed.org/forum/showthread.php?58709-New-Items-For-Sale-Check-th…
New items for October 26, 2017:
Boards:
3Com Corp IE Controller (1982) ASST 0345-03 REV J - very early(?) IBM PC
ethernet controller; BNC and AUI connectors; good condition, maybe probably
still works [
http://bitsavers.informatik.uni-stuttgart.de/pdf/3Com/3C500_Mar83.pdf]
3Com Etherlink II ASSY 2227-00 REV 08 - 8-bit PC ethernet controller; BNC
and AUI connectors; excellent condition
HP 82335 8-bit HP-IB ISA board - excellent condition - $35
Future Domain TMC-850MER "Apple Signal Port" 8-bit ISA SCSI board - has
socket for BIOS EPROM; comes with 50-pin ribbon and Y-splitter power
cables; like new; [http://www.vcfed.org/forum/archive/index.php/t-9546.html]
- $30
Unpopulated (New Old Stock) Motorola MC68000 Educational Computer board -
like new condition - $20 shipped anywhere in USA
Sirius Systems Tech peripheral mainboard - for Victor 9000/ACT Sirius 1
computers; excellent physical condition, unknown functional condition - $13
shipped anywhere in USA
Peripherals
Panasonic Interface Adaptor RP-K100 - parallel port interface for Panasonic
word processor(?) - $5
Kroy Digital Cassette Drive Cat. No. 1674400 "290 Keyboard" - digital
microcassette data drive; 34-pin dual row connector; includes digital
microcassette tape - $15
APCON ACI-2016 SCSI Booster - 68-pin SCSI booster, w/power supply - $10
Advanced Electronic Applications PK-64 PAKRATT-64 - packet radio modem for
Commodore 64; excellent condition - $60
Remex 5.25" drive - inside external enclosure with power supply and 34-pin
connector; excellent condition inside and out - $15
HP 82950A Modem - includes severely water damaged but mostly readable users
manual - $45
HP 00085-15001 Mass Storage ROM - HP-85 mass storage ROM, allows HP 85A to
connect to disc drives - $25 shipped anywhere in USA
Avatex 1200HC 300/1200 external modem - $5
Atari SC1224 (Version 2) color monitor - powers up, has raster, do not have
cable to test - $70
Atari SH305 MegaFile 30 - contains Seagate ST-238R hard drive; powers up,
drive spins up, sounds healthy; case was slightly hacked by a less than
skilled hand to add status LEDs to the front as well as a slot for a 3.5"
removable drive (not present; includes custom internal 34-pin slot
connector to external DIN connector cable) - $50
Atari 1064 - 48K parallel port memory module for Atari XL series - $20
Atari SX212 Modem - for IBM PC and compatibles; in original box with
manual, power supply, and data cable
BMUGNET adaptors for Macintosh - made by Bay Area Mac User Group;
pre-Farallon PhoneNet adaptors; works similar to Apple LocalTalk - 2/$10
Sun Type 4 optical mouse - $5
Commodore 1531 Datasette - $15
Plus Development Corp. Impulse dual external hard drive unit - same maker
as Plus Hardcard; includes (2) Conner CP-340 40MB RLL drives, powers up and
drives spin up with healthy sound; unable to test further; requires DB-19
cable and PC interface board to be fully useful - $20
DSP 225 Tempest InkJet Printer - HP ThinkJet Model 2225A (HP-IB interface)
fitted inside an all black TEMPEST resistant enclosure, fine working
condition - $75
Computers and Such
Tektronix 4050 - complete working system in excellent condition with
manuals and software on QIC
Apricot F1 - CPU only; powers up, blurts out some strange "beep" and seeks
a boot disk; (2) internal 3" drivesl unable to test further
Motorola Envoy - (3) units with (1) charge station and extra battery
Commodore 16 - untested - $30
Osborne 1 - original tan case; fairly low serial number (A01284); powers
up, screen is good, tries to boot from disk drive; very good cosmetic
condition with some scuffs, leather handle is broken - $160
HP 7475A Plotter - full complement of pens are mostly dried out but it
performs the demo function admirably; excellent condition - $85
Lynx 460 floppy disk drive exerciser w/User's Manual and Xerox Supplement -
$25
Atari Mega ST4 - powers up, seems to boot from the floppy drive, no monitor
cable so unable to test further; includes Practical Solutions Tweety Board
(adds true stereo) - $250
Radio Shack TRS-80 Model 100 - works great; very good condition with minor
yellowing and a couple scratches; includes form fitting faux leather case
in excellent condition - $40
Miscellaneous
Dolch Logic Instruments 9604 uP Trace Unit - logic analyzer module for
National Semiconductor NSC-800 microprocessor - $15
Tandy data cable - 34-pin slotted connector to Centronics male connector,
approx. 10' - $5
As always, please send inquiries to me directly via e-mail at for best
results.
Thanks!
Sellam
Beginning of the 70's I was using a pdp-10 at TSL (Time Sharing Limited, UK)
over a phone line writing logic simulation software in Fortran. Remember it
fondly, especially the number of times I needed to redial in and try to
reconnect to my session. Still smell the teletype. Cost about ?10 for the 20
seconds cpu-time or so just to compile the program!!!
Roll on a few years and I was actually at the console of a 10 at Smiths
doing IC layout graphics interactively on their Lady Jane suite. What a
great single-user machine!
(and I still remember my username and password from TSL, typed it so often
it burned in).
Bob
> -----Original Message-----
> Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2017 18:42:42 +0100
> From: "Rob Jarratt" <robert.jarratt at ntlworld.com>
> To: "'Dave Wade'" <dave.g4ugm at gmail.com>, "'General Discussion:
> On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts'" <cctalk at classiccmp.org>, "'Kip
> Koon'"
> <computerdoc at sc.rr.com>
> Subject: Re: Which Dec Emulation is the MOST useful and Versatile?.
> Message-ID: <003101d34cef$7eca53c0$7c5efb40$(a)ntlworld.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
>
>
> Ah the PDP10! Although the very first computer I used was a PDP11, it
> was so briefly that I really consider the PDP10 (in DECSYSTEM-20 form)
> to be my first computer. It is easy to emulate in SIMH, although the
> SIMH emulation is of a less capable processor (KS10) and I think KLH10
> is the best emulator for that (but I have never used it).
>
...
>
> Rob
Here is an interesting mini-documentary on the fight Gilbert Hyatt (patent
holder for the concept of the microcomputer) had with the Franchise Tax
Board of State of California:
https://youtu.be/rfyPZdSBwBQ
Sellam
Yes, but the irony if us replying on-list isn't lost.
-------- Original message --------From: Robert via cctalk <cctalk at classiccmp.org> Date: 10/24/17 11:40 AM (GMT-06:00) To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts" <cctalk at classiccmp.org> Subject: Re: Is it really that quiet out there?
The last one that I received was October 20th.
Robert
oddly there were times you could dial into a broken dec 10 connect
and end up connected to someone elses session.... Ed#
In a message dated 10/25/2017 2:18:30 P.M. US Mountain Standard Time,
cctalk at classiccmp.org writes:
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cctalk [mailto:cctalk-bounces at classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Robert
> Adamson via cctalk
> Sent: 25 October 2017 20:56
> To: cctech at classiccmp.org
> Subject: Digression - Ah Yes!! The PDP-10
>
> Beginning of the 70's I was using a pdp-10 at TSL (Time Sharing Limited,
UK)
> over a phone line writing logic simulation software in Fortran. Remember
it
> fondly, especially the number of times I needed to redial in and try to
> reconnect to my session. Still smell the teletype. Cost about ?10 for the
20
> seconds cpu-time or so just to compile the program!!!
>
I used to use the DECSYSTEM-20 from a Teletype (until they got replaced by
VDUs). That is why I really wanted a nice Model 33 ASR, which I now have.
I
sometimes connect it up to SIMH running TOPS-20 to relive the happiest part
of my school days.
> Roll on a few years and I was actually at the console of a 10 at Smiths
doing IC
> layout graphics interactively on their Lady Jane suite. What a great
single-user
> machine!
>
> (and I still remember my username and password from TSL, typed it so
often
it
> burned in).
>
Hi,
In case anyone is interested, I have finally cobbled together a web page
that documents the construction of the Popular Electronics Cyclops camera
that I exhibited at the 2016 VCF East. It also documents my work to produce
a Cromemco S-100 Cyclops that I hope to exhibit at the 2018 VCF East. The
page is here:
http://wsudbrink.dyndns.org:8080/cyclops/index.html
The Cromemco S-100 Cyclops starts down the page a bit.
Bill S.
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
Hello,
the vertical heat sinks for the TO220 with this design are fairly common, I
saw them many times on various boards.
However, as they are simply aluminum parts, you can clean them for sure.
After removing the screw, you could try simply with an hard brush.
If badly corroded, remove the bubbles of oxide with a thin sanding paper,
then you could restore the opaque aspect submerging for few seconds in
caustic sodium solution. Be aware to protect eyes and skin!
Replace the RIFA X2 capacitor!!!!
Andrea
Anybody familiar with the internals of these disks? I have one here
which seems to have the positioner stuck at track zero. I'm not sure
whether it's likely to be just a bit sticky and in need of some
assistance or whether there is some sort of latch involved, and I am a
bit reluctant to just pull the lid off the chamber to find out.
Thanks
Phil
IT RUNS MEMORY RESIDENT LOADED FROM PAPER TAPE?
ED#
In a message dated 10/20/2017 7:37:48 A.M. US Mountain Standard Time,
jwest at classiccmp.org writes:
"Forth-like" system that is well developed/flushedout. So in addition to
BASIC, you get oh-so-many-wonderful-things. I very highly recommend that
anyone messing with 21mx/1000 systems take a good look at HP-IPL/OS.
Hi DEC Enthusiast's,
If I were to have to decide on just one model DEC PDP system to run in a DEC
Emulator, which one would be the most useful, versatile and has the most
software available for it?
I have only ever used a real PDP-8/e system way back in high school so I'm
not up to par on any other model of DEC PDP system and I only know BASIC on
the PDP-8/e so not much there either.
I hear a lot about the PDP-11. I found out that there were 16 major PDP
models at one time so I'm not too sure which one to pick.
I built Oscar Vermeulen's PiDP-8/I which I'm waiting on 1 part for. Other
than that project which is in a holding pattern at the moment, I have no
other PDP anything running in any form.
Back in the day when Bill Gates and company 1st started out, I had always
wondered how they developed their very 1st software program - Altair Basic.
I was pleasantly surprised one day when I saw a B/W photo of a young Bill
Gates bending over the operator at what looked like a very small computer.
Maybe it was just a terminal. I don't remember. I understand they did
software development on a DEC PDP of some sort.
Finding this out regenerated my interest in the DEC PDP line of computers.
I have many projects in the works already so I decided to setup a software
emulation of just one of the DEC PDP models. I have heard a lot about the
PDP-11 which if the information I read is correct was 16-bits. My PiDP-8/I
is 12 bits. I understand the PDP 10 was 36-bits and the PDP-15 was 18-bit.
The PDP-11 is the model I hear the most about.
I also have some experience on some version of a VAX when I was in the Air
Force so I'm thinking of getting a VAX emulation going at some point too.
So if I'm going to do this, what suggestions, pointers, experiences,
etcetera do you guys have for me. I am very interested in the DEC PDP
equipment though next to no experience so I have no basis to make a
decision. This is a serious request so I would definitely like to hear what
you all have to say. If you have read this far, thank you. Take care my
friends.
Kip Koon
computerdoc at sc.rr.comhttp://www.cocopedia.com/wiki/index.php/User:Computerdoc
Anybody want some Convex Computer Corporation manuals on microfiche. The
titles are:
- CONVEX C Guide
- CONVEX C Optimization Guide
- CONVEX FORTRAN User's Guide
- CONVEX FORTRAN Reference Manual
- CONVEX FORTRAN Optimization Guide
- CONVEX VECLIB User's Guide
- CONVEX LSQPACK User's Guide
Free to a good home or it will be plastic recycling
The last one that I received was October 20th.
Robert
On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 2:27 PM, jim stephens via cctalk
<cctalk at classiccmp.org> wrote:
> Last one of those was a couple weeks ago. Then there were a bunch of backed
> up ones.
>
> List has been steady and in real time (from what I've seen).
> thanks
> Jim
>
>
> On 10/20/2017 11:30 AM, Chuck Guzis via cctalk wrote:
>>
>> Lately, I've received
>> message "belches"
>
>
On 10/19/2017 05:00 PM, Jon Elson wrote:
> On 10/19/2017 06:44 PM, Chuck Guzis via cctalk wrote:
>> My question for those knowledgeable with this drive is what's the
>> downside of adjusting the gain to create an output of, say, 7V P-P?
>>
>>
> Well, you might have to turn it back down for newly recorded tapes. But,
> if you are using it only for recovery of old data, maybe no downside at
> all.
>
> But, there are so many defects in old tapes.? There's print-through,
> wrinkles from the tape pack scrunching, weave, oxide flaking, dirt
> buildup, and maybe some others.
No, it turns out the answer is to set the preamp gain at spec. It
appears to do nothing but create more problems if turned up higher than
that.
It was worth a try.
--Chuck
I have a couple of hard disks I want to make dd copies of. I have Ultrix
running on my DECstation 5000/240 with the disk I want to clone attached to
it. The trouble is that I don't have enough disk space on the machine to
clone the disk and then grab the image using FTP. I have been trying to find
a way to pipe the dd output over the network to a SIMH Ultrix machine that
has plenty of disk space. I tried piping dd into rcp, but rcp doesn't seem
to take input from standard input. I have looked at cpio, but that too
appears not to accept input from standard input.
Unix is not my strong point. Are there any other ways I could pipe the dd
output across the network to a machine that has enough disk space?
Thanks
Rob
On Sun, 22 Oct 2017, Sean Conner via cctalk wrote:
By gum! Alpine does indeed translate the 'A' into a '?' and I never
noticed. It seems that my tiny mind simply translated the character
and moved on.
> I have:
>
> LANG=en_US.UTF-8
> LC_COLLATE=C
>
> as part of my environment, and I'm using a font that supports UTF-8...
And how does one know that a font supports UTF-8?
And yes UTF-8 has been around for decades but as an English speaker I didn't
have to think about unicode and locale and stuff like that.
--
Richard Loken VE6BSV : "...underneath those tuques we wear,
Athabasca, Alberta Canada : our heads are naked!"
** rlloken at telus.net ** : - Arthur Black
> Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2015 21:41:53 -0500 (EST)
> From: ethan at 757.org
> Subject: Re: Could someone make this topic go away?
> Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1511192141030.32673 at users.757.org>
> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
>
> Am I the only one left using Pine!?
>
> I get odd looks when I'm checking email from my cell phone.
No you are not.
I use (al)pine on my OpenVMS system here as well as my main Linux host. I
have mail going back to 2004 here and since 1996 at another public access
Unix host I use. It's great when I'm out of town and can ssh in from my
phone and check the mail. :) Pine does most everything I need without
having to worry about malware, phishing, etc ... the beauty of text.
Fred
I'm going to put it on my list of projects to create a CPU card for my Microtutor that uses the 1802 instead I think.? I can get some blue PCB stock.? As far as I understand the 1802 is fully backward compatible.
Maybe the 1801s will show up on day.? I've found all kinds of chips I was told were impossible to locate.
Sent from my Samsung device
-------- Original message --------
From: Steven Feinsmith <steven.feinsmith at gmail.com>
Date: 2017-10-20 7:32 PM (GMT-08:00)
To: Brad H <vintagecomputer at bettercomputing.net>, "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts" <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Subject: Re: CDP1801
RCA 1801 disappeared from face of Earth forever... You would be better off to purchase at:
http://www.sunrise-ev.com/membershipcard.htm to use 1802. The 1802 was very successful microprocessor that replaced 1801 because it required to have a pair of chips to work together. I believe I saw 1801 was more than 30 years ago.
Good luck!
Steven
On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 9:45 PM, Brad H via cctalk <cctalk at classiccmp.org> wrote:
Hi there,
I just purchased an RCA Microtutor minus the rather important CPU card.? I
can recreate the card but I expect locating the 1801 chips will be
difficult.? I am just posting this in various forums in case anyone has any
leads on where I might find either the complete card or the required chips
to make a replacement.? I'm wondering what, if any devices were built with
the 1801 that I might be able to scrounge from.
Thanks again,
B
Steve,
I don't think I qualify to receive the whole shebang, nor would I have
room, but I will gladly take any box(es) un-tested / for parts / etc. C-64
hardware that you would care to offer.
I endeavor to repair CBM machines, primarily C-64s and peripherals, and I
am basically out of parts. I have almost a dozen machines stacked up that
can't run for want of various parts...
I'm in St. Paul, MN, and unable to work due to total disability (stage 5
kidney disease. among other things).
Best,
Bill Layer
On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 1:25 AM, Digital Aeon via cctalk <
cctalk at classiccmp.org> wrote:
> After many years of collecting, Im tired of moving it all
>
> So ive picked out 4 or 5 systems that mean alot to me. And i want to
> pass the rest of the collection onto someone starting out in the hobby that
> wouldnt otherwise have the funds to get some of the stuff I have.
>
> So if there is anyone out there starting out and wants what I have I will
> gladly hand it over to them free of charge. I would like to see this go
> to someone who doesn't have anything.
>
>
> I have apple, commodore, sun, x86 you name it I got it. about 4
> truckloads full if not more.
>
> Im located in Mid Michigan
>
> Steve
>
The list has been quite for 24 hours for me, so sorry if this is a
duplicate!
The sources for the the latest version of PC-MOS/386 are up on github.
Antonio
--
Antonio Carlini
arcarlini at iee.org
On 10/20/2017 6:46 AM, Camiel Vanderhoeven via cctalk wrote:
> On 10/19/17, 6:22 PM, "cctalk on behalf of Douglas Taylor via cctalk"
> <cctalk-bounces at classiccmp.org on behalf of cctalk at classiccmp.org> wrote:
>
>> Is there a potential problem here?
>>
>> I have an 11/53 microPDP11 with a RQZX1 controller connected to a single
>> DEC DSP3043 drive (535MB) and a single RX33 floppy.
>>
>> The autoconfigure setup in the RQZX1 puts the hard disk at DU0 and the
>> Floppy as DU1. OK. I boot RT11 from the disk, V5.7. Works fine.
>>
>> I would like to use some of the extra space on the disk by setting up
>> RT11 disk partitions.
>>
>> However, one of the partitions is DU1, but that is what the Floppy is
>> called. How do I stay away from what seems like a conflict?
>>
>> Doug
> SET DU2: UNIT=0,PART=1
> SET DU3: UNIT=0,PART=2
> ...
>
> ** reboot **
>
> INIT DU2:
> INIT DU3:
> ...
>
>
Thanks, it did work. I'll just stay away from DU1:.? I forgot about the
reboot required for these changes to take effect.
Steve,
I don't think I qualify to receive the whole shebang, nor would I have
room, but I will gladly take any box(es) un-tested / for parts / etc. C-64
hardware that you would care to offer.
I endeavor to repair CBM machines, primarily C-64s and I am basically out
of parts. I have 8-10 machin
On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 1:25 AM, Digital Aeon via cctalk <
cctalk at classiccmp.org> wrote:
> After many years of collecting, Im tired of moving it all
>
> So ive picked out 4 or 5 systems that mean alot to me. And i want to
> pass the rest of the collection onto someone starting out in the hobby that
> wouldnt otherwise have the funds to get some of the stuff I have.
>
> So if there is anyone out there starting out and wants what I have I will
> gladly hand it over to them free of charge. I would like to see this go
> to someone who doesn't have anything.
>
>
> I have apple, commodore, sun, x86 you name it I got it. about 4
> truckloads full if not more.
>
> Im located in Mid Michigan
>
> Steve
>
On Sun, Oct 08, 2017 at 03:36:00PM -0700, Zane Healy via cctalk wrote:
> While it?s still in need of a major update, the DEC Emulation
> website now has a new home. It?s now on my server, and
> realistically I should have moved it years ago.
>
> http://www.avanthar.com/healyzh/decemulation/decemu.html
Cool, thank you.
> Believe it or not, I am planning to update the pages in the near
> future, who knows, I might even modernize them a little. When I
> started them, one of the design goals was that they be readable with
> Lynx. I?m not sure how important that is anymore. :-)
I have browsed it just few moments ago with lynx, emacs-w3 and my new
textual favourite, elinks (it multitabs!! and shows tables!! and I could
play with configuration a lot, so on 256-colors-enabled term it looks
a bit nicer to my eyes). In all them, and in some old graphical one,
the site looks decently.
As of "modernisation"... You know, just MHO and stuff but sometimes
when I see modern pages it seems like their creators have had been
abducted to some sect and brainwashed clean. I have 1600x1200 and I
like to have some other window besides browser (say, an editor, like
emacs). So I open such page, and the browser has about 3/5 of estate
and I am not going fullscreen, no way. And there is huge menu on the
left side, so I can choose. And there is some (expletive0) "top bar",
all white and empty, or maybe with page title (I already have one
(expletive0) title on a title bar of browser window), then there is
(expletive0) bottom bar, all empty. And for a text, there is area left
which is about five to ten (expletive0) lines high. There is no
(expletive0) way to make those (expletive0) elements go the (subseq
(expletive0) 0 4) away. The last resort is to turn styles off, which
quite often gives me almost the view that I would like to have, plus
(quite often) a parade of (expletive0) leftovers from the leftside
menu, which after switch takes more than 90% of (expletive0) web
page. I swear I do not make this up. The usable part of the modern
webpage is on average the (expletive0) ten percent, as measured by
scrollbar - and sometimes even less.
The only reason I keep using very old Opera 1x.x is because it:
A) does not multithread (so when I load heavily crapped page, it only
(subseq (expletive0) 0 4)s with one core of my cpu max, rather then
(expletive0) with me fulltime
B) is able to show very decently a page with styles turned off; this
also sometimes means lowering core usage by half (the usage which is
there even when (expletive0) browser is expected to sit on its
(expletive1) and do nothing).
C) I turned a lot of CSS off by default, but I am not quite sure if
this really works (software, trust, does not compute) - and I put
fixed/monotype fonts wherever I can see them, because I love the idea
that space is same width as "i" and "W". So all the job done to max my
pleasure with downloadable fonts is lost, and (expletive0) good for me.
I have tried switching to Firefox, but somehow having eighty tabs does
not work very nicely there, for me at least. But I launch it when
there is something that poor Op cannot render properly. Overally, I
have few browsers opened as day goes by, one for Common Lisp docs,
another for casual reading, one for sci articles heavy with equations
and gfx (mostly up-to date rendering 'gine), few text browsers for
interesting stuff, books or longer reads etc. I have recently started
to experiment with Dillo - this is very nice piece of (expletive2),
recommended to everybody even if it not always shows things, kind of
like text browser with graphics (sometimes) and multitabs. Perhaps
will also try "old new" Mosaic - the old one got lost during
innumerable system upgrades.
As I could have observed, plenty of people out there think that
"modern" means "optimised for mobile", but what does it mean in
practise? The text, i.e. useful part of the page might take 10
kilobytes (optimist, me, always), there might be even useful pictures
on it, and then there goes a (expletive2)load of javascript. Megabyte
is a, kind of, norm. So, this (expletive2) eats my download/upload
quota, for which I pay (in theory, because I never was in such
position). And then it starts running and eats from my battery, which
can be loaded for peanuts, but who wants to recharge every few hours -
this is supposed to give me mobility, but not to/from wallsocket.
Which is how I came to brainwashing - the words being used are
redefined. Optimised no longer means what it used to mean. Now it just
means conformance to some group's standard. Optimised for pats in a
back, just not from enduser (some endusers dream of packing boot deep
into webdevel's (expletive1) and leaving it there, and the second boot
would go to their halfbrained tasteless boss'es (expletive1), only
deeper).
For me, "optimised for mobile" is something like HTML1.0, or maybe
even 3.0 (if this is when tables were defined). And "modern" is
unimportant, if a goal is information retrieval. If you (or anybody)
plan to upgrade your webpage, please consider doing it like XIX
century guy, just barely after computer lessons. Text is
everything. Because this is how information is being
transmitted. Pictures are few, and if they are there, there must be a
purpose (like, they too convey some information somehow related to
text).
So this is my opinion on modern web design, and mind you, I am not
using it on a cell phone, but on something as big as two A4 pages, and
the (expletive0) web cannot do very well on such (expletive0) huge
area, or significant part of it. What are "they" using for making
their creations - a monitor wall? I cannot imagine my state of mind if
I started to depend on a cellphone for web reading, but I guess a
dictionary of expletives could get few new words. There is no day
without cursing the web here, despite all the heavy measures I took to
protect myself from poor (i.e. modern) design. Well, maybe I curse the
web only every other day, plus every time the page almost loads except
one small element (perhaps some JS dependence, and server is
down/restarting so I wait minutes because reloading only makes things
worse in this case - but perhaps this is my ISP's fault, but then ISP
is part of it, too).
As of Javascript - sure there is a place for it. I dream of writing a
compiler in Javascript. A few have been written. Ok, maybe I do not
dream so much to learn Javascript. But the whole "page is an app" is
just misunderstanding in best case, or more probably, some kind of
crime - crime against reason, for example.
This was meant to be short(er), but got long(er). Blame the web.
--
Regards,
Tomasz Rola
--
** A C programmer asked whether computer had Buddha's nature. **
** As the answer, master did "rm -rif" on the programmer's home **
** directory. And then the C programmer became enlightened... **
** **
** Tomasz Rola mailto:tomasz_rola at bigfoot.com **
Hey Kevin.
This is all good advice, but there is also another way to go - and it's a
bit more future-proof. For about the same cost as the Zoom floppy, you can
get a device called an SD2IEC or similar. It's very simple - it connects to
the IEC (disk drive) port on the C-64 and accepts a micro or mini SD card.
This way you only need copy your C-64 titles to SD card (any way you like)
and they will be accessible to the C-64. The device behaves like a 1541 /
1571 drive.
I say the SD2IEC is future proof, as it doesn't rely on original 15X1 disk
drives or 5-1/2" media, all of which could go away someday.
Now _personally_ I use a home-built XM1541 cable with opencbm (free/OSS) to
transfer my images to genuine 5-1.4" disk. I only do this as I'm too cheap
/ broke to buy something else like the SD2IEC. It is exceptionally stable
and reliable - once set up, it "just works". Though if you a) run Linux and
b) accept a kernel update you will need to c) recompile & re-install
opencbm as the module is built specific to the running kernel. This takes
only seconds, literally.
-Bill
On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 7:48 AM, Robert via cctalk <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
wrote:
> I recently bought a ZoomFloppy from here: http://store.go4retro.com/
> zoomfloppy/
>
> I got the version with an IEEE488 conector, for use with a PET, but it
> also supports the serial interface used on the C64.
>
> On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 9:11 PM, Cameron Kaiser via cctalk
> <cctalk at classiccmp.org> wrote:
> >> There are some online repositories of C64 software. Having only a little
> >> knowledge when it comes to C64_s how do I get a C64 disk
> >> image onto a 5 1/4_ floppy?
> >
> > I use a ZoomFloppy and a real 1541 (actually a 1571). These devices are
> > available from many places; Jim Brain built mine, or you can look for any
> > xu1541 or xum1541-type device and use OpenCBM to copy that floppy.
> >
> > --
> > ------------------------------------ personal:
> http://www.cameronkaiser.com/ --
> > Cameron Kaiser * Floodgap Systems * www.floodgap.com *
> ckaiser at floodgap.com
> > -- BOND THEME NOW PLAYING: "Moonraker" ------------------------------
> ----------
>
NOPE NOT A BIG RTE PERSON - BUT YES THERE WOULD BE MULTI SERIAL
BOARDS IN SOME INCOMING PROCESSORS
RAN IT ONCE AND PLAYED WITH IT...
BROKE 1000 SYSTEMS DOWN AND SOLD THE PIECES. THE ONLY SYSTEMS THAT WE
SUPPORTED SOFTWARE WISE WERE F AND THEN ACCESS
THIS 21 WHATEVER IS THE SKINNY ONE! DOUBLE SIDED KEY - AND IF I
REMEMBER WILL YANK IT UP OFF THE FLOOR IN MY OFFICE TOMORROW AND SEE THE #
BUT SUSPECT 2108 AS
ABOUT ALL I REMEMBER LIKING ABOUT IT WAS IT HAD THE BOOT BUILT IN
,GRIN!.
WHAT I DID NOT LIKE WAS IT WAS NOT CORE MEMORY.
SURE WERE FUN TIMES...
ALTHOUGH THERE WAS ALWAYS A FOND SPOT FOR THE 21XX STUFF... I GOT
REALLY OCCUPIED WITH THE 3000 AS A COMPUTER THAT I WOULD REALLY USE. IN THE
EARLY DAYS OF RUNNING THE ACCESS THOUGH WHAT GREAT FUN AND THE
100 BOARD BBS/MULTI USER CHAT/VOTE AND POL/EMAIL AND MOST GAMES WE DID
GOT MOVED TO THE 3000.
ED - WHOSE KEYBOARD THINKS IT IS AN ASR 35 TELETYPE SO THAT IS HOW THE
REST OF THE MESSAGE GOT FININSHED
In a message dated 10/20/2017 7:37:48 A.M. US Mountain Standard Time,
jwest at classiccmp.org writes:
Ed wrote...
------
HP 21mx/whatever processor works with double sided key... (I forgot
model#)
------
Given the way you phrased it, the correct replacement for 'whatever' is M
series. E and F never used the double sided key.
However, even that is not entirely correct. Older M's used the double sided
key. Later M's used the single sided key that is the same as the E and F.
And....
-------
It has ... of all things 3 tty boards in it? what is with that? Multi
user without a mux?
-------
Didn't you sell and support these things in a prior life? It was always far
more common to see the 21MX machines with 'discrete' tty boards rather than
muxes. There were only two mux boards, the one in 2000/Access which was
very
uncommon as far as 21mx's go... and the one that RTE commonly used which
was
also not super common to find in the wild. If you had a mux board, then I
would have been a bit surprised. Multiple tty boards? Not surprised, that
was the far more common thing.... more often than not, the 21mx's weren't
really used/targeted for multiuser (except 2000 TSB of course). RTE did
multiuser well, but... still was probably most often used in situations
that
really didn't require it. Mux's weren't super common.
And....
--------
Has 2 memory boards think I remember 64k total.
--------
64kb or 64kw? Remember, the M.E.M. option is required to support more than
32kw. On the M, MEM was optional. I believe it was standard on E & F.
And...
-------
need to find a paper tape basic to play with.
-------
There are plenty of those floating around. Google is your friend... I think
MU-BASIC may have been the one I heard people using? See below for a better
option....
And...
------
Any other advice?
------
You should probably start by reading an introduction to the 21MX to get
some
basic background on the machines...
Go to: http://www.hpmuseum.net/exhibit.php?hwdoc=108
You should start with 02108-90004 followed by 02108-90002
Finally - for you (and anyone else) that has just a cpu or a cpu and
minimal
peripherals, the best thing you can use to play with the machine is Terry
Newtons HP-IPL/OS.
See http://www.infionline.net/~wtnewton/oldcomp/hp2100/ and
http://newton.freehostia.com/net/hpiplos.html
Yes, you can run BASIC like you mention above. But it is a very well done
"Forth-like" system that is well developed/flushedout. So in addition to
BASIC, you get oh-so-many-wonderful-things. I very highly recommend that
anyone messing with 21mx/1000 systems take a good look at HP-IPL/OS.
Best,
J
RCA 1801 disappeared from face of Earth forever... You would be better off
to purchase at:
http://www.sunrise-ev.com/membershipcard.htm to use 1802. The 1802 was very
successful microprocessor that replaced 1801 because it required to have a
pair of chips to work together. I believe I saw 1801 was more than 30 years
ago.
Good luck!
Steven
On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 9:45 PM, Brad H via cctalk <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
wrote:
> Hi there,
>
>
>
> I just purchased an RCA Microtutor minus the rather important CPU card. I
> can recreate the card but I expect locating the 1801 chips will be
> difficult. I am just posting this in various forums in case anyone has any
> leads on where I might find either the complete card or the required chips
> to make a replacement. I'm wondering what, if any devices were built with
> the 1801 that I might be able to scrounge from.
>
>
>
> Thanks again,
>
>
>
> B
>
>
I have a bus backplane here, very similar to an S100 backplane but the 2x50 connectors use .1 in spacing instead of .125 and the supply voltages are regulated +5 and +/- 12V.
I also have the power supply; what are they from?
TIA,
m
I was looking at an old GI catalog and casually noting the CP1610 that was most of a PDP11 processor. I did some more web surfing and noticed that the Intellivision game machine used this chip. It just never dawned on me that they used this processor.
I see that one could even get a keyboard for these.
Dwight
Hello,
Does anyone have a setup to image RL02 packs to a pc file that can be mounted with simh? I have a couple of dozen I would like transferred because I am downsizing. I have a bunch of gear I can trade, also rum and/or dollars. Hopefully you are close to Houston.
Sincerely,
John Welch
Spring cleaning time!
I have three vintage HP 9836 computers, two monochrome monitors, one
color monitor and three printers.
I'm sure they are going to need work to get running. No testing has been
done. Could probably get two out
of the three working. Somewhere I have a few various I/O cards also that
will be included.
Photos can be seen here: http://anifur.com/clist/
Pickup in Santa Cruz, CA, I just don't have time to (or the back) to
pack and ship, though I can help load.
-Bob
--
Vintage computers and electronics
www.dvq.comwww.tekmuseum.comwww.decmuseum.org
That's a starting bid at 20,000 euros?
-------- Original message --------From: St?phane Tsacas via cctalk <cctalk at classiccmp.org> Date: 5/30/17 5:56 PM (GMT-06:00)Subject: Micral N (1974) for sale
If it happens you're in Tours (in France, https://goo.gl/maps/BXNZ4YJixYq)
June 11 2017, a Micral N from 1974 will be auctioned.
More info -- in French -- on the auction house website
https://www.rouillac.com/fr/news-1252-le_micral_n_premier_micro_ordinateur
Starting price : 20 K?.
Good luck ;-)
--
??phane tsacas
I have a couple of the Corona and Cordata desktops. Apparently Corona
Data Systems was forced to change their name when the manufacturer of
Corona typewriters objected. So yes, Corona did predate the Cordata
computer.
My first PC clone was the PPC-400, and I still have the service manual
(copy.)
Marvin
> From: Sam O'nella <barythrin at gmail.com>
>
> I have a similar but think mine says cordata which i guess yours is an early model? Is there no model number or serial or was that edited out? Just curious. ?If you post on vcfed.org some younger collectors will find the historical significance interesting of a potential unauthorized IBM compatible. I find those companies that were sued out of existence or folded easily an interesting time in an aggressive young home computer market.?
> -------- Original message --------From: Bob Rosenbloom via cctalk <cctalk at classiccmp.org> Date: 5/27/17 10:38 PM (GMT-06:00) To: cctalk at classiccmp.org Subject: Corona Data Systems PC available
> More spring cleaning. This time it's a Corona Data Systems PC.
> Kinda like an old Compaq unit. Has floppy and hard disk, but does not
> boot up.
>
> Pickup in Santa Cruz, CA
>
> http://anifur.com/clist/corona1.JPG
>
> http://anifur.com/clist/corona2.JPG
>
> http://anifur.com/clist/corona3.JPG
I have a similar but think mine says cordata which i guess yours is an early model? Is there no model number or serial or was that edited out? Just curious. ?If you post on vcfed.org some younger collectors will find the historical significance interesting of a potential unauthorized IBM compatible. I find those companies that were sued out of existence or folded easily an interesting time in an aggressive young home computer market.?
-------- Original message --------From: Bob Rosenbloom via cctalk <cctalk at classiccmp.org> Date: 5/27/17 10:38 PM (GMT-06:00) To: cctalk at classiccmp.org Subject: Corona Data Systems PC available
More spring cleaning. This time it's a Corona Data Systems PC.
Kinda like an old Compaq unit. Has floppy and hard disk, but does not
boot up.
Pickup in Santa Cruz, CA
http://anifur.com/clist/corona1.JPGhttp://anifur.com/clist/corona2.JPGhttp://anifur.com/clist/corona3.JPG
Did you get an actual Firefly (research) board, or a prduction VAXstation
3520/3540 board? I don't think you're likely to find schematics or pinouts
for either, but it's not impossible to find 3520/3540 stuff, while I've
never before heard of anyone encountering any actual Firefly boards in the
wild.
Back in the 80's I had some archive disks (maybe SIG/M or CPM/UG or maybe
something else?) which had files on the disk named like ZOSO.022 (for disk
#22) which was the Star Trek basic game disk. I'm attaching below the text
>from that file (best viewed with a monospace font). I seem to recall this
person who went by the moniker of Zoso had written others as well, but I
can't find them right now.
Just curious if any of you had seen those and if anyone knows who this
mysterious Zoso person was? If I find others I'll post them.
Regards,
Amardeep AC9MF
* * * * *
THIS DISK CONTAINS THE FOLLOWING FILES:
STARTREK.TXT THIS IS THE ORIGINAL SOURCE FILE FROM WHICH THIS PACKAGE WAS
DEVELOPED. IT IS PURPORTED TO RUN AS IS WITH MITS 8K BASIC. IT
CONTAINS ALL THE REMARKS, AUTHOR CREDITS ETC. IF YOU HAVE THIS
BASIC WITH ASCII-LOAD CAPABILITY, TRY IT !!
BIGTREK.ASC THIS IS THE RESULT OF HAVING TRIED TO TRIM THE ABOVE SOURCE SO
AS TO GET IT TO RUN (IN A 64K SYSTEM) WITH MICROSOFT'S MBASIC.
IT PRESENTLY IS ALMOST SHORT ENOUGH, BUT NOT QUITE. BECAUSE OF
THIS, THE OBJECTIVE BECAME TO MAKE IT SUITABLE FOR TDL'S DISK
BASIC RUNNING IN 64K. IT RUNS QUITE NICELY THAT WAY. ALL OF THE
FEATURES OF THE ABOVE PROGRAM ARE RETAINED, AND A COUPLE OF NEW
ONES HAVE BEEN IMPLEMENTED.
BIGTREK.BAS THIS IS THE COMPACTED MACHINE CODE OF THE ABOVE FILE WHICH
LOADS ABOUT 50 TIMES FASTER THAN THE ASCII VERSION (TDL DISK
BASIC ONLY). THE PROPER STEPS TO LOAD THIS ARE AS FOLLOWS :
(ASSUME YOU HAVE LOADED TDL BASIC INTO A 64K SYSTEM)...
1 - OPEN#1,"I","BIGTREK.BAS" <CR>
2 - LOAD "B" <CR>
3 - CLOSE#1,"I" <CR>
4 - RUN <CR>
TREKINFO.DOC A BRIEF TUTORIAL ON THE RULES FOR PLAYING THIS, CROSS-REFER-
ENCED WHERE POSSIBLE WITH THE FAMILIAR COMMANDS OF THE MORE
COMMONLY AVAILABLE 'STARTREKS'.
TREKMOD.ASC SEE EXPLANATION (IN POST-SCRIPT).
STRTRK/2.ASC THIS IS INCLUDED BECAUSE I LIKE THE 'COMMUNICATIONS' AND 'MIS-
SION-PROGRESS-REPORTS' THAT HAVE BEEN IMPLEMENTED IN THIS MUCH
SMALLER (STILL > 20K) VERSION.
NO MATTER HOW YOU GO WITH THIS, IT IS LIKELY THAT YOU WILL NEED 64K (PERHAPS
60K IF YOU USE 8K BASIC) TO RUN IT AT ALL. ONLY GUARANTEE IS THAT IT WILL
RUN
WITH TDL DISK BASIC/64K AS IS.
SINCE I CAN RUN THIS, I LEAVE IT TO SOMEONE ELSE TO GET IT WORKING WITH
EITHER
MICROSOFT DISK BASIC (OR BASIC-E). ONE SUGGESTION FOR THE FORMER PROJECT
MIGHT
BE TO PARTITION THIS PROGRAM INTO TWO MODULES. THE FIRST WOULD CONTAIN ALL
OF
THE LINES RELATING TO GALAXY INITIALIZATION, DIMENSIONING STATEMENTS, DATA-
TABLES AND ALL BEGINNING OF GAME DIALOGUE - IN OTHER WORDS, LINES NOT REFER-
ENCED AFTER GAME IS IN PROGRESS. THIS FILE MIGHT BE CALLED 'STARMOD1.ASC'.
THE
OTHER MODULE, 'STARMOD2.ASC' WOULD CONTAIN EVERYTHING ELSE. THE LAST COMMAND
(TO BASIC) IN 'STARMOD1.ASC' WOULD BE: MERGE"STARMOD2.ASC". BOTH MODULES
WOULD
HAVE TO BE RENUMBERED IN SUCH A WAY THAT AT THE BEGINNING OF THE 'MERGE',
EACH
NEW LINE OF 'STARMOD2' WOULD WIPE OUT A LINE OF 'STARMOD1' WHICH HAD THE
SAME
LINE NUMBER (UNTIL EVERY LINE OF FIRST MODULE WAS OVERWRITTEN BY A NEW LINE
>FROM SECOND MODULE). ONE CHANGE WOULD BE NECESSITATED IN THE SECOND MODULE:
IF
A PLAYER REPLIED 'Y' TO THE QUESTION, 'ANOTHER GAME ?' A BRANCH WOULD NEED
TO
BE MADE TO A LINE WITH THE FOLLOWING COMMAND, - RUN "STARMOD1.ASC". THIS
SOL-
UTION IS A BIT 'KLUGEY', BUT PERHAPS PREFERABLE TO FURTHER TRIMMING. SEE THE
'P.S.' BELOW; THE MICROSOFT MANUAL IMPLYS (BY NO PROHIBITION) THE LIKELIHOOD
OF SUCH (ABOVE-MENTIONED) ARTIFICES BEING EFFECTIVE. THE DISAPPOINTMENT THAT
MR. DOGGE ENCOUNTERED SHOULD BE ATTRIBUTED TO HONEST EXPERIMENTATION
COMBINED
WITH (THE TYPICALLY) INADEQUATE DOCUMENTATION.
HAVE FUN !!! - ZOSO
LATE NOTE: THE EXPERIMENT WITH MERGING TWO OR MORE MODULES HAS BEEN TRIED.
I
AM SAD TO REPORT THAT THIS APPROACH APPARENTLY DOES NOT WORK. IT SEEMS THAT
THE EFFECT OF THE 'MERGE' FUNCTION IS TO DESTROY DATA (IN ADDITION TO
CERTAIN
LINE NUMBERS). MY THANKS TO MR. E. DOGGE FOR THIS INFO. E.D. ALSO SENT A
'TRIM-
JOB' OF 'BIGTREK' CALLED 'TREKMOD'; IT PLAYS THE SAME GAME, BUT LACKS THE
'SCO-
RING' AND 'VISUAL' FUNCTIONS. NOT TO DEMEAN MR. DOGGE'S EFFORT, I CAN'T PER-
SONALLY SEE HOW THIS PARTICULAR 'STARTREK' CAN BE MEANINGFUL WITHOUT THE
SCO-
RING ROUTINE. IF THIS WERE MY 'BABY', I WOULD (IF NECESSARY) REDUCE EVERY
BIT
OF (TEXTUAL) CONSOLE OUTPUT TO A 2 DIGIT CODE SO AS TO RETAIN 'SCORING'; THE
'VISUALS' ARE CUTE BUT NON-ESSENTIAL. SEE WHAT YOU THINK. ALSO !!! THERE ARE
(IN THE 'BIGTREK' FILES ONLY) SOME CRUCIAL ERROR TRAPS WHICH I INSERTED.
LOOK
FOR THESE AT THE BEGINNING OF THE 'NAVIGATE' AND 'IMPULSE' SUBROUTINES. THE
COMMON STARTREK PRACTISE OF INPUTTING A '0' WARP-FACTOR (DISTANCE) TO ABORT
AN IMPROPERLY ENTERED NAVIGATION ROUTINE WILL, WITHOUT THESE TRAPS, GIVE YOU
A 'SUBSCRIPT OUT OF BOUNDS' ERROR, AND THE GAME WILL HAVE BEEN (LITERALLY)
LOST. I SUGGEST COPYING THESE EXACTLY IF YOU WILL BE TRYING THE 'TREKMOD'
IM-
PLEMENTATION.
Hi everyone,
I am very interested in DEC stuff and I would love a PDP11 to play with
and have in my (small) collection. If anyone has one in the UK that they
would be interested in selling, please contact me off list. I'm
interested in both Q-bus and Unibus models.
Pretty unlikely but I thought I'd ask.
Thanks!
--
Aaron Jackson
PhD Student, Computer Vision Laboratory, Uni of Nottingham
http://aaronsplace.co.uk/
Al struck a memory cell I haven't used in at least a quarter century. No, I do not know who
The Mysterious Zoso actually was but he was legendary. His flaming just barely crosses the
line into early trench industry journalism I guess. Certainly not the shine of Charlie Matco
or Ted Dziuba, but maybe the first step in that direction?
>From CPMUG 21:
BITCH, BITCH, BITCH !!! SOME PEOPLE ARE JUST INCAPABLE OF BEING CONTENT. NO
SOONER THAN I HAD FINISHED MY REPLY TO ALL OF THE TTY PEOPLE (VOLUME 13.21),
TONY INFORMED ME THAT SOME VDM OWNERS HAD TROUBLE READING MY 80 CHARACTER
LINES ON THEIR QUAINT I/O DEVICES. I WILL NOT ACCOMODATE YOU, AND HERE'S WHY:
I PAID GOOD BUCKS FOR THE TOOLS I USE, AND I CHOOSE TO USE THEM. FRANKLY, I
CAN'T FATHOM WHY ANYONE WOULD ADMIT TO OWNING ONE OF THOSE THINGS AT ALL. I'VE
SEEN WHAT YOU GUYS ARE UP TO: THOSE HORRID, NARROW LITTLE PROGRAMS WRITTEN IN
PROCESSOR TECHNOLOGY'S 5K BASIC (YOU KNOW THE ONES WITH A LINE FOR EVERY SINGLE
LITTLE THING - 15 DECWRITER PAGES JUST TO PRINT YOUR VERSION OF WUMPUS [ABOUT
WHICH I SHALL BE HEARD FROM LATER]). YOU GUYS HAVE EXPOSED YOURSELVES TO CAT-
ARACTS AND MYOPIA BY LOOKING AT YOUR VDM'ED TVS. LEAVE ME OUT OF IT !!! THE
COMPANY WHO SUPPLIED THOSE B & W CRAYON BOXES TO YOU IS A PLACE TO SUSPECT...
SEMI-KITS, 8K BASIC THAT WILL BE READY IN 1976 AND ENOUGH ADVERTISING TO EN-
SURE YOU WILL HAVE PAID TOO MUCH FOR YOUR 'SOL'; ANOTHER MITS I THINK...
ZOSO
The following would like to find new homes: Not ESPECIALLY interested
in boxing/shipping (the docs would be easy, and would love to see them
preserved for posterity).
BOXED SunOS 4.0 doc set with 4.0.1 update
2 lg , 1 medium, 2 small boxes
Also have SunOS 4.1.2 install manual
Sun Hardware (specs from stickers, not validated)
2 SPARCstation IPC
2 SPARCstation IPX (1 w/ PowerUp 80Mhz CPU, which stopped working?)
any all of the above may have bad power supplies
2 SPARCstation LX (one marked 32MB, no floppy)
1 SPARCstation Classic (no floppy)
3 SPARCstation 10 (10/30 w/ 16MB, 10/41 w/ 80MB, 10/41 w/ 64MB)
1 SPARCstation 4 (bad P/S)
1 SPARCstation 5
SUN QIC (150?) drive in box
SCSI CD-ROM in enclosure
Many 50 pin SCSI cables
AT&T "UNIX PC" (7300?) w/ mobo, monitor, keyboard & mouse
No hard drive. The owner got bored when the grounding on the
HD started making noise. I think he yanked the 68000 chip,
and perhaps others.
Another eBait wonder:
http://www.ebay.com/itm/182597510806
The listing says "Local pick-up only", and it's in Denver, Colorado. Someone
should really save this (although the chances of finding all the boards to go
with it is pretty slim).
Noel
> From: Warner Losh
> Will it fit in a pickup truck?
Should fit into most 4-wheeled transport devices (except a new Ford GT, those
supposedly only have 2 cubic feet or so of storage :-).
Noel
> From: Paul Koning
> For some definition of "standard". ... other machines of that time or earlier
> numbered bits according to the power of 2 they represent, i.e., the "current
> standard".
Well, the vast majority of computers 'back then' numbered bits (and byes)
>from left to right - which is why in numbers in TCP and IP, the bytes go from
left to right (necessitating byte swaps on most current architectures before
sending a packet out into the network).
The majority of computers being attached to the network when TCP/IP was being
defined used that byte order (I think PDP-11's were the only exception, but
I'm too lazy to check a copy of HOSTS.TXT to make sure), and so that's what
we're stuck with now.
So, I can see, centuries in the future, the bytes in a word on the Internet
(and it _is_ capitalized) still being in an order set by long-dead computers.
Kind of like how rail gauge today still mimics the width of Roman carts (yes,
I know the story is only half-true, but it's not wholly wrong).
Noel
Against my better judgement, I obtained a DEC SRC Firefly dual processor
card. If i read this* correctly, then this card is interfaced to the
shared memory bus (MBUS) as opposed to the QBUS (the card uses a Q bus
format).
I realize it's probably hopeless, but I'll ask anyway: Are there any
schematics or specifications on the connectors anywhere?
*IEEE Computer, also available on Bitsavers as a technical report.
We need to find a source of the pin feed paper for the 43! Also a
great thing to round out the display would be to have the aux. tape reader
punch that was marketed for it- non working is ok visually - working
would be a wonderful thing!
Ed# _www.smecc.org_ (http://www.smecc.org)
In a message dated 5/24/2017 8:26:28 A.M. US Mountain Standard Time,
cctalk at classiccmp.org writes:
On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 7:20 PM, Jim Brain via cctalk
<cctalk at classiccmp.org
> wrote:
> On 5/23/2017 1:07 AM, dave.g4ugm at gmail.com wrote:
>
>> You probably need a null modem cable.
>>
> I had one (and used it), but not all null modem cables are evidently the
> same :-) I soldered up a loopback as you suggested, and the unit dropped
> into DATA MODE on startup. I then played with the signals. The unit
> really does want DCD to be active, as just doing CTS/RTS, DTR/DSR, and
> RX/TX did not do the trick. Evidently, my null modem cable I had tested
> with previously does not connect DCD. Swapped out for a null modem
adapter
> (from our old now deceased friend Radio Shack) and the unit works with a
> new Dell M4800 laptop (so "newer" style +-10V RS232 levels must be OK.
>
The minimum legit voltage swing for RS-232 is supposed to be plus and minus
5 volts and the
maximum allowed voltage swing is plus and minus 25 volts. The problems
occur when gear didn't
bother to do the negative swing to minus 5 volts. Plus and Minus 10 volts
is more than adequate.
The printer ribbon has less life left in it than I anticipated, but a list
> member is helping me, so it should be good to go after a deep cleaning
and
> a light oiling. I did notice the printhead starts to stutter at times on
> long lines, but I *think* it's a function of the damage to the ribbon, so
> we'll troubleshoot that only if it continues after ribbon fixes.
>
The ribbon on my 43 is a reinking type. The ribbon loop is maybe 18
inches? I have a new in bag
ribbon which I am sure is also dried out. I used a drop of thin oil on the
reinking roller the last time
I messed with it and that seemed to work. You probably want to use
something that will lubricate
because the pins on the dot matrix print heads do need that to keep them
>from rusting and wearing
out.
The "stutter" you mention is normal. The printer electronics buffers a few
characters during the slow
carriage return and prints slightly faster than 30cps so when a new line is
started it goes at full speed
until the buffer is empty at which point it goes into the stutter mode.
This eliminated the need to send
nulls after a carriage return that was necessary on the earlier purely
mechanical printers.
--
Doug Ingraham
PDP-8 SN 1175
If there's anyone out there with a rack-mount DEC AlphaServer 2100A - the
one with the underslung pair of power supplies -- I'd appreciate your help
in determining the 15-pin control-cable configuration for J3. It may
require examining the other end of the "power supply control cable assembly"
P#17-04014-01, which is 24-pin (to handle the dual/redundant power supply
configuration).
Available hardware documentation is pretty sparse. Physical examination of
an AlphaServer 2100A system backplane (54-24129-01) would certainly help!
While I'm pretty sure that I've figured out the +5V +- sense lines (pins
3-4), and the +3.3V +- sense lines (pins 15-14), I've failed to determine
the purpose of other control lines - most particularly which one(s) turn it
on. Pins 10 is suspect, but there's no obvious reference point for voltage
measurement or evidence whether it should be shorted to another pin, or .
something else.
There's no control relay or other obvious mechanism. The PCB is
dense-packed with surface-mount components on one side and power components
on the other; tracing circuits is a bear.
Applying AC starts up the 24VDC fans, but none of the four switchers kick in
:-<.
Thanks for any clues!
paul
I have long had an interest in server tech and "technology with character" I finally took the plunge and got a DEC and I am looking for something of a similar vintage to connect it to.
I have read about VAXstations, z80 based mainframes. This seems like the kind of devices I would like to acquire and learn the workings of.
I also require a keyboard for my DEC terminal.
As this is my first post to the list, I am mostly looking for resources (UK would be preferable)
-- H
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
Here's the page for now for your perusal - the temporary URL is subject to change.
http://oldcomputers.net/some-collectors.html
There's a submit button in the upper right, but it just emails me.
The entry field in the upper left is kind of fun - enter a valid address or location, select it from the drop-down box, and it takes you there. It also gives GPS coordinates.
This is a very cool COSMAC VIP that has been slightly modded to act as a
front-end processor for an SC/MP II processor board with a custom-built
front panel for the SC/MP as well as some interesting add-ons for the VIP
(PROM programmer, Tiny BASIC ROM card, CDP1855 math co-processor) and more.
Full description and links to photos here:
http://www.vcfed.org/forum/showthread.php?58035-RCA-COSMAC-VIP-with-SC-MP-I…
I also produced a video to show off the setup for historical purposes:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BozGSTumwXc
Thanks!
Sellam
Hello,
I tried to clone a boot drive ( on a bigger one ), using one of the scripts on nekochan.
The disk was initialized , labelled
Then formatted by the script, and cloned. The data is present if I mount it
The issue starts when I change the id and try to boot from it... this is what I get
esf read error, bad count
esf read error, bad count
no file system found for "unix".
unable to execute dksc(0,1,0)unix: media not loaded
autoboot failed
dksc(0,1,0)unix: media not loaded
>From Prom, ls gives :
dksc(0,1,8)/:
sgilabel sash symmon
esf read error, bad count
no file system found for "/".
Any suggestion is accepted.
Alessandro
Hello!
I recently received a HP9816 machine. The previous owner originally got the
machine without a keyboard but subsequently sourced a keyboard off ebay.
Unfortunately this keyboard was not in the best shape. One key was stuck
and when taking it apart it was evident that it has taken a bath for quite
some time. At least the electronics around the space bar were quite
affected with corrosion. Luckily this keyboard is quite simple design with
only CMOS 4XXX IC, and better yet, Tony Duell has already reverse
engineered it (together with the rest of this little machine). Thanks a lot
Tony!
But the stuck key appeared to be cause by the "plunger" (is that the
correct english word?) is slightly cracked in the corner. When the keytop
is inserted it is not sliding very well.
I have not found a method of repairing it so I am asking the community if
there are anyone that has spare "plungers" for the HP9816 keyboard.
http://i.imgur.com/q5aRQnC.jpg?1http://i.imgur.com/67xWZ8q.jpg?1http://i.imgur.com/cGWCKFw.jpg?1
This is the keyboard at the hpmuseum.net page:
http://www.hpmuseum.net/images/200serieskeyboardsmall-35.jpg
/Mattis
So I had a random thought in the wee hours this morning and I leave it
to you, the cctalk braintrust, to tell me exactly how stupid this idea is:
I have a VAX-11/750, an Able QNiverter (UNIBUS->Qbus adapter), a 22-bit
Qbus backplane, and a VCB02 (QDSS) 4-bit graphics boardset.
Theory: With an appropriately modified NetBSD driver for the VCB02, such
that it provides only 18-bit addresses to the VCB02's DMA engine, I can
get X running on the VCB02 on the 11/750.
That is, the configuration is: 11/750->Unibus->QNiverter->Qbus->VCB02.
Obviously the console functionality of the VCB02 won't work since that
requires support on the VAX side of things that won't be present, but I
think everything else should work. I've browsed the technical manual
and I don't see anything that should get in the way, I'll just need to
hack up the driver appropriately.
But this is something that randomly popped into my head (I was inspired
by a research paper, "A VAX Based Data Acquisition Computer System at
the Nuclear Structure Research Laboratory" wherein a Matrox QRGB Qbus
graphics board was lashed to an 11/750 in a similar manner...
What say you all?
- Josh
My flatmate has one of these. Just the small subassembly with the 2
push-buttons and a red light between them. Is this something that
would be of interest to anyone? I'm trying to persuade him to eBay it
instead of throwing it away.
We've also got the plastic covers from a few disk packs, an empty
metal chassis and a few other odds and sods. Sadly most of the machine
was binned long long ago. :-(
--
Liam Proven ? Profile: https://about.me/liamproven
Email: lproven at cix.co.uk ? Google Mail/Talk/Plus: lproven at gmail.com
Twitter/Facebook/Flickr: lproven ? Skype/LinkedIn/AIM/Yahoo: liamproven
UK: +44 7939-087884 ? ?R/WhatsApp/Telegram/Signal: +420 702 829 053
Hi,
will join a group buy, need caps for 2 drives ..
With best regards
Gerhard
-----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht-----
Von: cctalk [mailto:cctalk-bounces at classiccmp.org] Im Auftrag von
cctalk-request at classiccmp.org
Gesendet: Montag, 06. M?rz 2017 19:00
An: cctalk at classiccmp.org
Betreff: cctalk Digest, Vol 33, Issue 6
Send cctalk mailing list submissions to
cctalk at classiccmp.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://www.classiccmp.org/mailman/listinfo/cctalk
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
cctalk-request at classiccmp.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
cctalk-owner at classiccmp.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than
"Re: Contents of cctalk digest..."
Oh boyee:
http://www.ebay.com/itm/112414315290
I thought the M variants all had blank front panels and bootstraps, but
this has all the pretty stuff!
How difficult are those switchers to fix for one trained in EE, but better
at debugging logic?
=]
--
Anders Nelson
+1 (517) 775-6129
www.erogear.com