From: dwight <dkelvey at hotmail.com>
> If we'd thought about it we could count to 1023 on our fingers.
I used to play string bass in a symphony, and there were many times that
there would be long periods of rest, where it was important to count the
bars (measures) going by so as to come back in at the right time. To this
day (that was 40+ years ago) I can still count quite rapidly up to 31 on one
hand (either one). Higher numbers slow me down a bit...
Old bass joke: During the last movement of Beethoven's 9th symphony, there
is a very long tacit (rest) for the basses. So the bass section all went
over to the bar across the street for a drink or three. To keep the
conductor from passing by their entry, they put a rubber band around his
music. So the situation was... Bottom of the ninth, basses loaded, score
tied. (sorry...)
~~
Mark Moulding
Greetings
I recently purchased a QCS external hard disk on ebay. This was one of the
companies that was selling DEC Rainbow hard drives. I had hoped it was an
old Rainbow drive with interesting to me bits... Turns out it is an Epson
QX-10 hard drive, full of interesting to bits for the QX-10 CP/M
enthusiast. I've had trouble finding a suitable community to note this in
should there be people around that care... so I thought I'd ask here is
people know of good CP/M groups and/or QX-10/16 groups, mailing lists, irc
channels, discord servers, etc I could find.
Warner
> From: Chuck Guzis <cclist at sydex.com>
> Numbering of bits in a word is also interesting. Is the high order bit
> in a 64 bit word, bit 0 or bit 63? Both conventions have been employed.
This one has always boggled me, because it's the one aspect of the
Endian Wars where there's a simple, straightforward answer grounded in
basic mathematics - base ^ digit-number only gives the correct
place-value when the lowest-order bit is numbered zero. It's beyond my
ken how anybody thought the reverse was *valid,* let alone a good
idea.
Australian HP museum site... yes kudos to them!? What wonderful work they have done and some of the friendliest? peple around!
Even though I pull a copy down from there. If it is,for something we have in the collection? I also try to get original manuals too..
On Sunday, January 31, 2021 Tony Duell <ard.p850ug1 at gmail.com> wrote:
On Sun, Jan 31, 2021 at 6:25 AM Frank McConnell via cctalk
<cctalk at classiccmp.org> wrote:
>
> On Jan 30, 2021, at 10:09, ED SHARPE via cctalk <cctalk at classiccmp.org> wrote:
> > Hi Doug! No, we do not have a copy of this HP JOURNAL.? We do not have manuals? either.? We,are lucky to have the unit wonder if you can still order ink for the printer. I do have an unopened ink cartrige.
You can get scans of the manuals from the Australian HP museum site
Do you have any expansion boards in it? Extra memory is very useful
(and you can turn any of the boards into a 1MByte one by adding the
chips and changing links). As is an RS232 interface (something that
IMHO should have been built-in)
Do NOT leave the ink cartridge in the machine. The ink is somewhat
corrosive and if it leaks onto the flexiprint that connects the
cartridge to the logic PCB it will damage it. Due to the layout of the
machine the flexiprint is longer than the one in a normal Thinkjet so
you can't just raid one of those for spares. Yes there is a way to
kludge it with ribbon cable and connectors but it's best not to have
the problem in the first place.
>
> HP 51604A.? I was surprised a few months ago to find that Staples claims to be able to sell new HP cartridges.? Looking earlier today, HP can too!
>
> Seriously, we?re talking about ink cartridges including replacement print heads for printers manufactured in 1983.
I was equally surprised to find that ink ribbons for the Epson HX20
laptop (M160 printer mechanism) along with the ones for the narrower
M150 mechanism are still being made.
But as I've said before, I'd rather find parts for a machine made 30
years ago than one made 5 years ago.
-tony
> From: Tom Uban
> The part numbers are:
. A106239-ND, TE Connectivity AMP Connectors 1-171196-0, CONN PLUG 6POS MATE-N-LOK NATRL
> A1427-ND, TE Connectivity AMP Connectors 1-480323-0, CONN PLUG 15 POS MATE-N-LOK
> See attached picture
That didn't come through for people on the list; I have posted it here:
http://ana-3.lcs.mit.edu/~jnc/tech/pdp11/jpg/tmp/dec_connectors.jpg
so everyone can see his connectors.
> Looking at the TE.com catalog, the picture for 1-480273-0 does not match
> my DD11-DF connector
Actually, the 1-480273-0 is _exactly_ the unit DEC used; I looked at the power
distribution panel from a BA11-K, and that's what it uses. (I'm too burned out
to look at the engineering drawings and get the part number to confirm; I'll
do that 'soon'.)
I took a picture of the male shells, and added it to the CHWiki page (I'll add
the females tomorrow). The detail of the 6-pin one didn't show up too well, so
I took another closeup of just it, here:
https://gunkies.org/wiki/File:DECPwrConnMaleSml.jpg
Your 15-pin is the same as mine (the part number matches). Your 6-pin has
'wings' on the side (these prevent it pulling through when placed in a hole in
sheet metal); the 6-pin DEC used has little right-angle arms, just like the
ones on the 15-pin, to brace it in place.
They are compatible, though, I think; a female shell that will take one
probably will take the other.
Noel
On Sat, Jan 30, 2021 at 9:01 AM ED SHARPE via cctalk <cctalk at classiccmp.org> wrote:
> Just curious how many Hewlett-Packard Integral? computers were sold.??
>
> We have one here at the SMECC Museum that we are building a display around it for.??
>
> Of course we are looking for any advertising material, posters or anyting visually related to this computer to make the display "more than just a computer on the table"?
>
> Please let us know if you have any material that would fit this need!??
>
> Thank you very much in advance
> Ed Sharpe - Archivist?? for SMECC
As to the number sold, you should be able to get a sense of it by collecting serial numbers from those who have them - once you get enough of them (maybe 20 or so) you should get a sense of about where the numbering started and where it ended. I have two units and if you're interested I can pull the numbers and send them along.
At 06:01 PM 1/30/2021, you wrote:
>>>Which Henry was that?? Henry Spencer perhaps?
>>Yes, Henry Spencer (formerly of zoo.toronto.edu).
>>N.
>
>Another blast from the past. I haven't seen anything of or spoken with him in nearly 30 years.
A legend, indeed, and one that only makes me upset about Google's Usenet archive.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry_Spencerhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_Groups
Couldn't Google just give someone else a copy of what Spencer
(and everyone else) gave them?
- John
Wayne.. yes please send the 2? serial numbers and others are invited to participate also.
Probably good idea to send offlist? to kerp from clogging lister.? Thanks Ed#
On Sunday, January 31, 2021 Smith, Wayne via cctalk <Wayne.Smith at warnerbros.com; cctalk at classiccmp.org> wrote:
On Sat, Jan 30, 2021 at 9:01 AM ED SHARPE via cctalk <cctalk at classiccmp.org> wrote:
> Just curious how many Hewlett-Packard Integral? computers were sold.??
>
> We have one here at the SMECC Museum that we are building a display around it for.??
>
> Of course we are looking for any advertising material, posters or anyting visually related to this computer to make the display "more than just a computer on the table"?
>
> Please let us know if you have any material that would fit this need!??
>
> Thank you very much in advance
> Ed Sharpe - Archivist?? for SMECC
As to the number sold, you should be able to get a sense of it by collecting serial numbers from those who have them - once you get enough of them (maybe 20 or so) you should get a sense of about where the numbering started and where it ended.? I have two units and if you're interested I can pull the numbers and send them along.
I'm trying to repair an LSI-11/93 that has a bus timeout problem.?
Unfortunately the BA23 box it normally sits in lives in a cupboard with
printers stowed on top of it and due to my domestic situation (small
condo) I can't get it out to scope or get a scope anywhere near it to
scope the bus.
I'm thinking that the solution would be to get a small QBUS backplane
that I can put on my desk in the middle of my test equipment.
Like a 4-slot ABAB oir even ABCD would do.
Does anybody have one they don't want?? Power supply not needed.
cheers,
Nigel
--
Nigel Johnson, MSc., MIEEE, MCSE VE3ID/G4AJQ/VA3MCU
Amateur Radio, the origin of the open-source concept!
Skype: TILBURY2591 nw.johnson at ieee.org
> From: Glen Slick
> The KDJ11-E 11/93 has PMI signals on the CD connectors, so you need a
> Q/CD backplane
I have this bit set that plugging a PMI card into a Q/Q slot will damage it?
(I think the issue is that some PMI pins are 12V on normal QBUS; too tired
to check tonight, I'll get to it tomorrow.)
Noel
Thanks? folks for the part number for ink jet cartridges. .. we have differnt interface standards version of Thinkjet? plusevthe one in the integral so we can play still!
Big thanks for the corisive? ink warning. .. I had no idea!
Hopefully we can turn up some poster art and other things? to add? to the display too!? -Ed#
On Sunday, January 31, 2021 Tony Duell <ard.p850ug1 at gmail.com> wrote:
On Sun, Jan 31, 2021 at 6:25 AM Frank McConnell via cctalk
<cctalk at classiccmp.org> wrote:
>
> On Jan 30, 2021, at 10:09, ED SHARPE via cctalk <cctalk at classiccmp.org> wrote:
> > Hi Doug! No, we do not have a copy of this HP JOURNAL.? We do not have manuals? either.? We,are lucky to have the unit wonder if you can still order ink for the printer. I do have an unopened ink cartrige.
You can get scans of the manuals from the Australian HP museum site
Do you have any expansion boards in it? Extra memory is very useful
(and you can turn any of the boards into a 1MByte one by adding the
chips and changing links). As is an RS232 interface (something that
IMHO should have been built-in)
Do NOT leave the ink cartridge in the machine. The ink is somewhat
corrosive and if it leaks onto the flexiprint that connects the
cartridge to the logic PCB it will damage it. Due to the layout of the
machine the flexiprint is longer than the one in a normal Thinkjet so
you can't just raid one of those for spares. Yes there is a way to
kludge it with ribbon cable and connectors but it's best not to have
the problem in the first place.
>
> HP 51604A.? I was surprised a few months ago to find that Staples claims to be able to sell new HP cartridges.? Looking earlier today, HP can too!
>
> Seriously, we?re talking about ink cartridges including replacement print heads for printers manufactured in 1983.
I was equally surprised to find that ink ribbons for the Epson HX20
laptop (M160 printer mechanism) along with the ones for the narrower
M150 mechanism are still being made.
But as I've said before, I'd rather find parts for a machine made 30
years ago than one made 5 years ago.
-tony
Hi Doug! No, we do not have a copy of this HP JOURNAL.? We do not have manuals? either.? We,are lucky to have the unit wonder if you can still order ink for the printer. I do have an unopened ink cartrige.
I will have to get a copy of this journal meanwhile I will read this one you sent the link to!
Back when we were selling? the HP PC? computers? this was a current product but outside our contract? with HP.? I was working with HP 150 abd the display potables HP offered and used 1000 2000 and 3000 systems? but always looked at how neat? this was.
Ed#
On Saturday, January 30, 2021 Doug Salot <doug at blinkenlights.com> wrote:
I assume you already have a copy of the Oct 1985 HP Journal?http://hparchive.com/Journals/HPJ-1985-10.pdf
On Sat, Jan 30, 2021 at 9:01 AM ED SHARPE via cctalk <cctalk at classiccmp.org> wrote:
Just curious how many Hewlett-Packard Integral? computers were sold.??
We have one here at the SMECC Museum that we are building a display around it for.??
Of course we are looking for any advertising material, posters or anyting visually related to this computer to make the display "more than just a computer on the table"?
Please let us know if you have any material that would fit this need!??
Thank you very much in advance
Ed Sharpe - Archivist?? for SMECC
On 1/29/21 12:58 PM, Fred Cisin via cctalk wrote:
>> I like indentation, and demanded it from my students.
>
> That's fine, but when you have a language that makes indentation part of
> the language (i.e. no braces, brackets or keywords denoting boundaries
> of the block) , there be monsters.
>
> And yes, there are such languages.
Uh - Python comes to mind...
~~
Mark Moulding
Just curious how many Hewlett-Packard Integral? computers were sold.??
We have one here at the SMECC Museum that we are building a display around it for.??
Of course we are looking for any advertising material, posters or anyting visually related to this computer to make the display "more than just a computer on the table"?
Please let us know if you have any material that would fit this need!??
Thank you very much in advance
Ed Sharpe - Archivist?? for SMECC
> Whenever I start a new job the first thing I do today is enable
> -Werror; all warnings are errors. And I?ll fix every one. Even
> when everyone claims that ?These are not a problem?. Before
> that existed, I?d do the same with lint, and FlexeLint when I
> could get it.
On Fri, 29 Jan 2021, wrcooke at wrcooke.net wrote:
> That's exactly what I did and was then told I was likely to get fired for
> it. I left that job soon after.
> "A person who never made a mistake never tried anything new." -- Albert
> Einstein
Similarly, "You don't have time to write comments as you go along. You
can go back and add them in AFTER the program is working." Of course, as
soon as it "seems to be working", "We're not paying you to mess with stuff
that's already DONE. We have ANOTHER project that you have to get on
immediately."
It's not good to be in a job where they won't let you be thorough in error
checking nor let you write comments.
And, of course, "Don't waste space with more than two decimal digits for
year. NOTHING that we are doing now will still be in use 30 years from
now."
One of the tasks that I was assigned (working for a contractor at GSFC)
was to work on converting a wall of punch-card subroutines for plotting on
Calcomp plotters that needed to be changed to work on Stromberg-Carlson
(later Stromberg Datagraphics). It was budgeted for a LONG project to
rewrite all of them. I realized that all of the subroutines for Calcomp
called lower and lower level routines, on down to a small number of
primitives. It was easy to write primitives for those lowest level ones,
that worked on the SC/SD. I got some help with the JCL to link my
primitives to the routines for the Calcomps. All of the routines for
Calcomp worked fine calling their lower level routines, and ultimately
calling MY primitives. The company got a small bonus for getting it all
done way sooner than planned, and I got a private major reprimand for
getting it all done way sooner than it was budgeted for. Many others
earned bonuses for the company. The company distributed the bonuses as
BIG bonuses to upper executives (I think that the top guy got a car), and
gave each of us a gift certificate/coupon for a turkey.
I?ve acquired the display and keyboard portion of a CPT Phoenix Jr but the seller didn?t have the system unit. (I suspect someone along the chain of custody thought it was a generic PC and recycled it.)
Does anyone have one that needs a home?
? Chris
? who has an affinity for portrait displays
Sent from my iPhone
In case you need a half-height SCSI enclosure to add to your VAX etc, I
put one up on EBay.
Item ID: 224332273248
https://www.ebay.com/itm/224332273248
Van Snyder
> I have a feeling there are two shell designs for the 6 pin.
Like I said, I have a vague memory of another keying design (I think it used a
ridge running parallel to the direction of insertion), but I don't think it's
>from any DEC gear. There is definitely yet _another_ keying design, with
triangular sawteeth, but again, I don't think any DEC gear used that.
> The one on my DD11-DF that I want to mate has detents in the corners
> while the catalog picture for the 6 pin on your part number shows a
> square in the center of the side.
Yes, the ones on the DD11-[C,D] (female shell, male pins) have 2 filled-in
corners, and the ones on the harness into which they plug (male shell, female
pins) have both the cutout corners (to match the filled-in corners on the
female shells), _and_ "a square in the center of the side".
As I said, I had verified that my female shells plugged into the male shells
on an -11/40 harness; I just went and checked, those males have the exact
identical shape to the ones I got (with the listed part number), including
both cutout corners and the square in the center of the side. (Oddly enough,
the 15-pin male shells used in that generation of DEC power connectors do not
have the square in the center of the side, just the cutout corners.)
Noel
I do not know this guy, this came through my site, but if you do have info
that you think he might find useful and would like to share please contact
CECIL the Specific.
VintageComputer.net Inquiry Contact Information Name: CECIL CRAIN
Email: ccrain at rgoldlegal-got-com Phone: 4157869527
------------------------- Comments:
I'm looking for any information about Bakelite insulating
materials and phenolic resins used in Univac DCT products manufactured
in the Salt Lake City facility from 1970 to 1978.
VintageComputer.net
---------------------------------------------------------------
Bill
> Are the power connectors on the DEC PDP-11 backplanes (e.g. DD11-DF
> 15pin and 6pin) Molex or other?
> Are they still commonly available?
https://gunkies.org/wiki/DEC_power_distribution_connectors#Connectors
I'm not sure why I bothered to write all this stuff up; it was clearly a waste
of time.
Noel
> I may have gotten the wrong 6pin shell.
I have this very vague memory of some similar connector shell, but I have no
memory of what the difference is.
I just checked the shells I have here, and they definitely fit onto the power
harness on an -11/40; and the numbers on the Web page are correct.
If yours arrives, and it works, please send me the number and I'll add it to
the page. Actually, if it _doesn't_ work, send me the number, and I'll add a
'no not use xxx, it doesn't work' note.
Noel
I have an HP 9817 and 9133D disk drive that I am trying to get going. The 9817 has a 98204B composite video card. I can mess with the settings of a composite monitor enough to barely read the text on the screen, which indicates that the machine is trying to boot from device A. I tried to make an image of the hard drive in the 9133D using Dave's MFM emulator, but the drive is pretty much toast and I wasn't able to recover much from it. If I connect the drive to the computer, it fails to boot and goes into BASIC.
I do not have a compatible HP monitor or HIL keyboard to use with the machine. I was planning on building a PS2 to HIL converter, but having an actual keyboard would be far easier. Likewise, having a monitor would be easier than abusing a normal composite display into working.
It looks like there were a bunch of compatible monitors back in the day. The 35721 and 35731B are mentioned on the HP Museum website.
In playing with DECnet I built a DDCMP implementation which deals with a byte stream, normally from a UART. So that works nicely with async link DDCMP as found in RSX and several other operating systems. But the speed is limited.
The other option would be synchronous links, which would enable connections to DMC11 or the like at speeds up to 1 Mb/s. But synchronous comm devices that connect to modern computers aren't so easy to find, though I have seen a few.
After playing with Arduino for LK201 keyboard emulation I started to wonder if one could be made to be a synchronous comm link with a USB back end, with low level things like byte framing and maybe DDCMP packet format handling in there, but the protocol state machine in the host behind the USB interface. For moderate speeds that seems entirely practical. For 1 Mb/s, probably not, though perhaps one of the fast ARM based units with its built-in SPI could be warped into that.
The alternative would be something like a BeagleBone Black (or Green) such as David Gesswein used as the engine for his MFM hard disk emulator. That clearly could do the job without any strain.
So I'm wondering: would there be interest in such a thing? If yes, should it be a modem-connected one (RS232 signaling, bit clock supplied externally by a modem or modem-eliminator)? Or should it be the "integral modem" short distance type, the ones that used a pair of coax with 4-pin AMP connectors like this https://www.digikey.com/en/products/detail/te-connectivity-amp-connectors/2… ?
paul
So, DEC part numbers (xx-yyyyy-zz) have a system where the 'xx' says what
_kind_ of part it is; e.g. bootstrap PROMs are all 23-xxxxx-yy. I seem to
recall reading at some point something which listed all the xx- codes, and
what they meant - but now I can't find it. A Web search didn't turn it up, and
it's not in the 1974 'engineering handbook'?
Does anyone recall seeing it, and if so, where?
Obviously, I could look through a bunch of print sets, and reconstruct it
(e.g. 90- seems to mean mounting hardware - nuts and bolts, etc) but I'd
rather not put the time and energy into reconstructing the wheel, unless
there's no other way.
Noel
Looking for HP marketing posters, in English and other world laguages large systems like HP-3000 as well as HP-150 and other pc and workstations...?? urgent need for monarch butterfly HP-150 poster!!!? Will be part of smecc museum hp display. -? Thanks Ed#
Does anyone still have one of these with the 50 pin drive splitter card and could take some pictures?
I picked one up a while ago and just noticed a 20 pin part is missing at U91, probably a PAL :-(
Ok, with the RX02 running I see that 50 of these disks from Solarex were
formatted with the FD: driver which is probably the MXV21 controller.
Since I don't have a 5.4 version of this driver and to be honest will
not be putting the MXV11 controller online anytime soon I'm offering
these disks for free.
So if you need 50 disks with various versions of RT11 and god knows what
data on them or 50 frisbees let me know and they're yours for the cost
of shipping. I need to either pitch these things or give them away.
Thanks!
Chris
Needed? HP 918lx computer? trim bezel!?a nice? one? appreciated? bit? one needing painting? or?? better? than none!Please? advise !?Ed Sharpe Archivist? for SMECC?
So I found an RXV21 board in the pile of stuff here and popped it into
my 83. Crashes the system. It's an M8029 D board, and I see from this
site that you have to add a few traces and cut a few others to make it
work on an 11/73 or better.
http://www.chdickman.com/rx02/
I'll pop in an 11/23+ CPU just to test it, but is it really just putting
in two wires on the top of the board and cutting a total of three
traces? Looks simple enough...
C
On Sun, 3 Jan 2021 at 03:53, Boris Gimbarzevsky <boris at summitclinic.com> wrote:
>
> Ran into 68000 processor for
> first time in 1986 when my father bought a 512 K
> Mac and couldn't believe performance of this CPU
It is odd. I had read of it, of course, but for me the revelation was
getting an Acorn Archimedes in 1989, with an 8MHz ARM2, and seeing it
blast past benchmarks of ~8MHz 68K machines such as the Amiga 500 or
Atari 512 ST. It was about 4x faster, I believe.
For me -- being a bit too young for the early days of the 68K family
-- it was not a performance chip, but more about its ability to have
lots of flat memory, unlike the crippled Intel chips that IBM used.
> Weird that Rod Coleman had 68000
> instruction set associated with IBM 370 whereas
> to me it was very PDP-11 like
I've heard that before, yes,. and never the IBM comparison.
I suppose it is a matter of what you're more familiar with.
> Thanks for the link as didn't realize 68000 was
> used for home systems before I ran into Mac.
Sinclair's QL used a 68008 and was launched some weeks before the Mac.
Of course Apple's own Lisa was before the Mac, too.
Very soon after came the Amiga and ST -- the "Jackintosh", "power
without the price."
--
Liam Proven ? Profile: https://about.me/liamproven
Email: lproven at cix.co.uk ? gMail/gTalk/gHangouts: lproven at gmail.com
Twitter/Facebook/LinkedIn/Flickr: lproven ? Skype: liamproven
UK: +44 7939-087884 ? ?R (+ WhatsApp/Telegram/Signal): +420 702 829 053
The question was asked (I misplaced the note) if the OS images that are on the Xhomer website work with David Gesswein's MFM emulator on real hardware.
You can turn these into emulator data files, provided you have the latest ext2emu tool that's part of David's software (as of 1/19/2021). The format needed is "Elektronika_85" which is the Pro format, called that because it was first added to the emulator as the format found on the Russian bootleg copy of the Pro of that name.
Results, on my Pro 380:
1. P/OS 3.2: works.
2. Venix: panic at boot, "Bad access number". That doesn't mean anything to me. I wonder if the issue is that Venix doesn't support the 380.
3. RT-11 5.3: works.
For grins I tried a smaller interleave factor than the default 5:1, since it seems reasonable that this should make things go faster on the Pro 380, given that its CPU is about 4x the speed of the one in the Pro 350. Somewhat to my surprise this isn't the case; the performance indicates that at 4:1 or smaller interleave the software misses the next sector and has to wait for another revolution.
paul
As some people here are aware, I have spent probably too much time this summer
hacking on J. David Bryan's excellent Classic HP 3000 simulator and trying to
build up the ultimate classic 1980s HP 3000 system (virtually speaking).
I started with the MPE V/R KIT that's widely available and expanded that into a
5x120MB HP 7925 disc system and configured things like the system directory
size and all the system tables to make a fully functional multi-user server.
I then set about collecting as much old MPE software as I could find, which
included Keven Miller's collection of the old Contributed Software Library tapes
which were conveniently available in SIMH format. This is a huge trove of cool
stuff including most of the classic mini/mainframe games (Dungeon, Warp,
Advent, etc., etc.) and even a little game called DRAGONS that was written in
1980 by a guy named Bruce Nesmith when he was in college and he used it
to get a job at TSR and went on to write parts of many classic D&D products
and eventually landed at Bethesda where among other things he was the
lead designer for another little game called The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim. I was
able to track Bruce down and give him a copy of the system with his 40 year
old game running on it. The CSL tapes also include other amazing goodies
that people developed and gave away over the years, including a FORTH and
LISP, as well as most of the system and utility programs that people used to
run their 3000 shops. It's quite fun to explore.
I was curious how far we could push the 3000 simulator, so I hacked all
the memory bank registers to be six bits instead of four bits, and we
now have a simulated HP 3000 Series III that supports 8MB of memory, 4x
more than any physical system ever did. I started trying to do the same thing
for giant disc drives, but MPE turned out to have too much knowledge of
what the supported disc models look like to make it practical. Bummer.
Since I met my first HP 3000 in 1980 (40 years ago this month), people would
talk about what was probably the most rare and exotic HP software subsystem
ever produced, APL\3000. APL on the 3000 was a project started at HP Labs
in Palo Alto in the early 1970s. They were likely motivated by the success IBM
was having with mainframe APL timesharing services. This would be the first
full APL implementation on a "small" (non-mainframe) computer. It would be the
first APL with a compiler (and a byte-code virtual machine to execute the
compiled code), it would include an additional new language APLGOL (APL
with ALGOL like structured control statements), and it managed to support
APL workspaces of unlimited size through a clever set of system CPU
microcode extensions that provided a flat 32-bit addressing capability (on
a 16-bit machine where every other language was limited to a 64KB data
segment).
Because APL required these extra special CPU instructions that you got as
a set of ROM chips when you bought the $15,000 APL\3000, and because
APL ultimately failed as a product (another story in itself) and thus HP never
implemented these instructions on their later HP 3000 models, I never saw
it run on a real HP 3000, but over the years we talked about wouldn't it be
cool to find a way to get APL running again.
With assistance and moral support from Stan Sieler and Frank McConnell
and others, I was ultimately able to reverse-engineer the behavior of the
undocumented ten magic APL CPU instructions needed to get it to run and
implement them as part of the MPE unimplemented instruction trap and now
APL\3000 runs again for the first time in ~35 years. Somewhat ironically, this
implementation method could have been used back in 1980 as I didn't
actually end up changing the hardware simulation code at all, and it should
also run (if a bit slowly) on any physical classic architecture 3000.
So that was cool and all, but what is APL without all the weird overstruck
characters and whatnot? APL\3000 supports the use of plain ASCII terminals
through blecherous trigraphs like "QD for the APL quad character, but this
is hardly satisfying. So the quest was on to find a solution. Back in 1976 when
APL\3000 was released, there was a companion HP terminal in the 264x line,
the HP 2641A APL Display Station, which was basically an HP 2645A with
special firmware and APL character set ROMs that supported all the APL
special characters as well as overstrikes (the terminal would take X<backspace>Y
and lookup to see if it had a character to represent Y overstriking X and if
so it would show that on the display, and if that got transmitted to the host it
would convert it back into the original three character overstriking sequence).
I briefly looked into the idea of hacking QCTerm or Putty or something, but
then I found out from Curious Chris that an HP 2645A emulator already existed
in the MAME emulator system! Since the '41 is basically just a '45 with modified
firmware, and Bitsavers had both the character set ROMs as well as the
firmware ROMs from a '41, this sounded like it might be easy! There was a snag
however in that the firmware ROM images that were allegedly from a '41 turned
out to actually be from an ordinary '45. But we did have the character sets and
one of the ROMs from the second CTL PCA. I put out a call on the Vintage HP
list to see if anyone might possibly have a lead on an actual HP 2641A, and
Kyle Owen responded that not only did he have one he could also dump the
ROMs for us. So a few days and a few hacks to F. Ulivi's MAME hp2645 driver
later we now have a functioning MAME HP 2641A terminal emulation, so you
can experience APL\3000 in all its original glory. I bundled up a somewhat
stripped down MAME along with my turnkey 3000 setup so both emulated HP
terminals are just a couple clicks away.
So that's how I spent my summer vacation (who am I kidding, it's pretty much all
vacation these days). It has been a lot of fun revisiting all this old
3000 stuff as
well as the numerous people I talked to along the way including some of those
who were around at APL\3000's birth (before my time). It was rather a lot of
work so I'd like to feel it might be useful to someone in the future
who is digging
into this part of history. Because of all the usual reasons, I don't
plan on hosting
it permanently until and unless we maybe someday get the licensing worked out
(the 50th anniversary of the HP 3000 will be in a couple years so maybe people
will get interested again then) but I will offer it up here to my
fellow computer
history nuts if you want to help ensure that it doesn't vanish if I
get run over by a
bus or something :)
This is a simulated HP 3000 Series III (circa 1980) running MPE V/R (circa 1986)
with 8MB of memory, all the language subsystems (APL, BASIC, BASICOMP, RPG,
FORTRAN (66), SPL, PASCAL, COBOL (68), COBOL II (74)), 20 years of users group
contributed software, many classic historical computer games, etc. Software
archaeologists can get lost in here for years. Oh, and thanks to Dave
Elward, the
HP 2000 Timesharing BASIC contributed library is even included (kinda sorta
converted to MPE BASIC) for good measure. This is a streamlined turnkey edition
that's ready to run out of the box with no assembly required (all
batteries are included).
Currently, I only provide executables for Windows (sorry) but am in
the process of
getting the 3000 simulator changes (for large memory support) and the new MAME
hp2641 driver back upstream. Instructions and further details can be
found in the
README.txt hint book for this adventure. 94MB Google Drive link:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1bmXvHkBLbUeLAid73EJ4H1yQ2uwXQuRu
Gavin
P.S. I'm giving a talk on the history of APL\3000 and its resurrection
to the ACM APLBUG
group in a couple weeks. If anyone is interested I can provide more
details when I have
them.
Well, with Dave's help we got the DSM-11 disk to boot on SIMH. Oddly
enough SIMH seems to read a raw RQDX1/2 disk pretty well.
sim> attach rq0 dsm.dsk
sim> set cpu 11/73,1m
Disabling RK
Disabling HK
Disabling TM
sim> boot rq0
Booting DSM-11...
DSM-11 Version 3.0A
Now running the baseline system.
<DKHER>:1 G ^STU
Exit
DSM-11 Version 3.0A Device #1 UCI:
Exit
DSM-11 Version 3.0A Device #1 UCI: ?
<NOUCI>:0
Exit
The problem is I don't remember how to use it anymore. Is there a PDF of
the DSM-11 manual anywhere? I think this was a clean install, but I'd
like to check it for data before putting it into archives.
Also which archive would be best for it?
CZ
I recently ran into an archive of various Pro 300 items, mostly from DECUS I believe. That includes a full P/OS 3.2 distribution including (!) DECnet/Pro if I saw that right.
It's at ftp://ftp.update.uu.se/pub/professional/
What makes things somewhat painful is that it's LHA compressed Teledisk images, which is an ancient DOS based floppy imaging tool. The instructions say to run Teledisk on a DOS system with a 5.25 inch floppy drive to write the images to RX50 floppies, which can then be used.
If you don't have DOS handy, or would rather get floppy image files for use with Xhomer, this can work but it's a bit painful.
I found there's a simpler way.
1. Decompress the LHA files. On a Mac, the unarchiver (I think that comes with the OS?) handles that format. On other operating systems, I assume it's equally straightforward to find a tool that handles this. You now have a pile of *.TD0 files, which are the TeleDisk format files.
2. From http://www.seasip.info/Unix/LibDsk/ install LibDsk 1.5 (not 1.4).
3. Use the dsktrans tool you got from step 2 to convert each *.TD0 file to a raw image, like this:
dsktrans -otype raw PRO177/177-21.TD0 proinstallv32.dsk
"raw" format means a straight sector dump in physical order; this is the format expected by xHomer.
If for any reason you want a logical order image, for example to give to the SIMH "rq" device that emulates an RQDXn controller, you'll need a tool that reorders things. I have one in my RSTS file system tool "flx" (V3 in Python, not the earlier 2.6 in C), "rx50.py". I can supply more details if needed.
paul
I have a few of these A990 boxes. They are complete with memory,
internal disk & DAT, & any 1000 interface you could possibly need. They
are the smaller 14-slot Micro boxes so a small footprint. I'm doing a
few of them for $1,300.00 each.. If anyone wants one, let me know. The
ebay link is below and feel free to ask me any questions about them.
www.ebay.com/itm/383752338096
<www.ebay.com/itm/383752338096>
Thanks
Jesse
Cypress Tech
People,
I'm trying to wrap my head around cc:Mail version numbers.
Various products such as Mobile and Gateways have their own separate
series of numbers, but the main products seem to be as follows.
Release Database Appeared in
1? ? ?
2? 6? ?
3? 6? ?
4? 6 ?
5 6 1995
6 8 1996
7? 8 ?
8 8 1997
I saw someplace that I cannot find now that DB6 is from 1989.
Can anybody fill in the missing numbers?
So for example, there is a package on Ebay right now
https://www.ebay.com/itm/LOTUS-ccMAIL-in-original-box-diskettes-manuals-Win…
that seems to say `Release 2.01' and 1993. How does that compute?
/Tomas
On 2021-01-20 19:00, "Ali" <cctalk at ibm51xx.net> wrote:
> Message: 14
> Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2021 00:38:21 -0800
> From: "Ali" <cctalk at ibm51xx.net>
> To: "'General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts'"
> <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
> Subject: RE: Looking for old Compaq software - COMPAQ System Manager
> Facility
> Message-ID: <00d501d6ef07$9cd2ab70$d6780250$@net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
>> For a workaround:
>>
>> This way You get a fixed brightness and somewhat working computer.
>> Now You can wait for a replacement pot and play with the computer.
> So turns out the pot itself is good after further testing. Of course now the
> question is why won't the brightness adjust on the machine?
>
> -Ali
Something supposed to be connected to the pot is not connected anymore?
I am guessing
a) the connection to the wiper is broken somewhere, or the circuitry
connected to it is broken, or
b) the ground end of the pot has a broken connection to ground
/Jonas
I just completed a set of tests of David's MFM emulator on my Pro 380.
Summary: everything works right. Very impressive device. My compliments to David for an amazing piece of engineering.
Details:
1. I built and tested it (rev C board) per the instructions and all that worked nicely. A few minor points in the instructions, quickly clarified by David and already updated on the web page. I used an old 2 MB BeagleBone Black (the kind that was shipped some years ago with the abandoned Angstrom distribution), that fits just fine.
2. I read the three drives I have, one RD51, two RD52 (Quantum). All worked fine. They were identified by the analysis tool as "Elektronika_85" which makes sense since that's a Pro clone.
3. On the RD52, the last cylinder cannot be read. The reason is that the DEC standard formatting tool does not format the last cylinder except on the RD50. I'm not sure why; the comments say it is "reserved for the FCT" but I don't know what that is. In any case, ignore those errors; the OS does not use that cylinder so nothing bad happens.
4. In spite of what the XHomer documentation says, Pro disks have 16 sectors per track, not 17. It may well be that the drive is physically capable of holding 17 sectors per track if you have an RQDXn controller, but the Pro format is definitely 16 sectors. And 4:1 interleaved to account for the performance issues of programmed I/O rather than DMA.
5. I set up auto-start of emulation mode using one of the files created by the disk reader. That works fine, the OS boots, identifies the drive type correctly, and runs happily.
6. I also tested creating a new empty RD52 image (i.e., 512 cylinders, 8 heads), and running a P/OS 3.0 install to that emulated disk. That works also; as Chris Zach suggested, the installer includes a low level formatter tool and invokes that automatically when it detects it is needed.
7. Poweroff data saving works nicely. I can watch the BBB keep running after I turn Pro power off, then after 5-10 seconds the BBB power light also goes off.
8. I looked at the extracted data files created by step 2: they are good block level data images of the disks.
A note on testing and drive copying: at first I tried to do this using a spare Pro power supply. That does not work because that supply requires a substantial minimum current. Even with a real drive plugged in alongside the emulator, the current draw is too small and the supply shuts down almost immediately. Instead, I temporarily connected an old small PC-type power supply I had lying around (rated at 50 watts according to the label); that was plenty for the emulator and also good enough to power it along with the drive to be read.
paul
For a workaround:
1. Solder any same size pot with suitable long wires to the location (if possible)
2. Adjust the brightness to Your liking
3. Remove the pot
4. Measure the resistance
5. Solder a measured value resistor where the pot was.
This way You get a fixed brightness and somewhat working computer.
Now You can wait for a replacement pot and play with the computer.
BR Matti
Hello All,
I am looking for an old piece of Compaq SW. It is used to communicate with a
Server Manager/R (or sometimes also known as System Manager) board. This was
Compaq's first attempt at a lights-out management (LOM) board. If anyone has
a copy and can share I would appreciate it! Thank you.
-Ali
Hello All,
I am looking for an EOL/no longer manufactured pot. It is a Clarostat
CM46895-3 and used to adjust the back light/brightness on a Compaq Portable
486c (pictures are here:
http://www.vcfed.org/forum/showthread.php?78057-Compa-Portable-486c-can-not-
adjust-screen-brightness). Because of the fit and finish issues it needs to
be this particular pot. If someone has one in their parts bin please drop me
a line.
TIA!
-Ali
Hi all,
I?m reassembling an H765 supply after cleaning and repairs. It has the "newer" style 15V and power monitoring board (the one with the edge finger connector, same as used in H7420 supplies.)
The board slides into a slot in a sub-chassis that also houses the power control circuitry, which small chassis later slides into, and is secured to, the larger H7420 chassis.
I cannot for the life of me figure out what, if anything, secures the power monitor board to the small chassis! There don?t appear to be any conveniently placed fixtures to which to screw down the board, and I haven?t been able to inform myself by pondering the various engineering diagrams, IPB?s, nor the pile of remaining fastening hardware...
When I test-fit everything in the larger chassis, the unsecured board is held captive only by the grace of the surrounding wiring harness and by some small clearance issues with the large cap on the board. This doesn't seem satisfactory; as part of something like an 11/34 on tilt slides, it would seem to bang around a bit in there if left loose like that.
Am I missing something? Puzzled...
--FritzM.
Found more stuff. 4 Perq boards, the HP1000, a Perq mouse and "pad", a
Sun4 keyboard with 15 pin plug, and another Perq2 keyboard. Also found a
weird one, a MFM drive with an adapter board on the bottom. Is the below
a MFM to Shugart interface?
Pics are up on the Discord server right now along with the HP1000.
C
I seem to recall that in "how to shoot yourself in the foot in various
programming languages," APL is something like "There's a bang. Your foot
is missing. You don't remember enough linear algebra to know how it got
that way."
Working to restore a series 30 , looking for any spare boards ,cpu ,bic boards from a series 30/33Just putting it out there ,long shot i knowCheers,Grant?Sent from my Galaxy
I'm wondering how to do hard drive formatting, which is likely to be needed when working with emulated disks in David Gesswein's MFM emulator.
As far as I can tell, RT-11 can do this. At least I have a source code printout for such a formatter. But while I can find a hard drive image of RT V5 for Pro, I haven't found any floppy-bootable images. And I think it's a bit tricky to create one. I knew, long ago for V2...
Any suggestions? Any alternative sources for a formatter? I guess I really should consider typing in the core of that formatter and adding it to RSTS.
paul
I have a nice ICL PERQ 2 T2 that I am going to start working with now.
First thing was to try to image the hard drive. It is a Micropolis 1303. It
spins up but when it reaches what I think the correct speed it immediately
spins down. Usually I think there would be a click and then the heads would
recalibrate. But there is no click and no head movement.
I really would like to make an image of the drive. What are your thoughts?
Are the heads sticking?
Some kind of solenoid that is not releasing the heads? Not properly up to
speed? (but it sounds like the speed is right)
/Mattis
Hi all,
Does anybody know if the old Compuserve discussion forums are
available anywhere now?
I'm specifically interested in the ones about HP Palmtops and cc:Mail.
/Tomas
Models SS-16, TEC-9900-SS, TR-9000-SS aka Technico/Rosse TR-9000-SS
"Super Star", or any other.
I think a couple of list members have indicated here or elsewhere in
the past that they had SS-16's at least.
Thanks for any help,
jbdigriz
This is probably the wrong list to ask, but maybe somebody could
forward it to a more appropriate list.
I have several of my father's books on electrical engineering. If
anybody wants any of them, let me know.
Van Snyder
van.snyder at sbcglobal.net
---------------------------------------------------------------------
----
Reference Data for Radio Engineers
Federal Telephone and Radio Corporation, 1946
Matrix Analysis of Electric Networks, Le Corbulier, 1946
Radiotron Designers Handbook, Smith, 1941
Digital Computer and Control Engineering, Robert S. Ledley, 1960
Control System Synthesis, John G. Truxal, 1955
Communication Engineering, Everitt, 1937
Dyadic Circuit Analysis, Sah, 1939
Electrical Engineers' Handbook, Third Edition, Communications
Electronics,
Pender & McIlwain, 1936
Electrical Engineers' Handbook, Third Edition, Electric Power,
Pender & Del Mar, 1936
Theory and Application of Microwaves, Bronwell & Beam, 1947
Electrical Catechism, C. S. Dearborn (signed) 1902
Electric Circuits, E.E. Staff, MIT, 1942
Transients in Linear Systems, Vol. 1, Lumped Constant Systems
Gardner & Barnes, 1942
Tensor Analysis of Networks, Gabriel Kron, 1939
Analog Methods, Karplus & Soroka, 1959
Electrical Engineering Leaflets, Houston and Kennelley, 1898
Silent Sentinels: Protective Relays for AC & DC Systems
Westinghouse Electic, undated, paperback
Hello everybody,
Does anybody have any early versions of cc:Mail that they can share?
I have v. 6 (1996) and 8 (1997).
Am looking for versions from 1994/5.
/Tomas
Hi folks,
I?m working on an 11/34 at the moment, with the programmer?s console, and it is missing its front panel power control knob. I think it is the same one used on the 11/04? Anybody have a spare in their parts stock that they?d be willing to part with?
(I?m also missing the plastic half-panel for the front, but I do see those go by on eBay from time to time.)
cheers,
?FritzM.
ftp://ftp.intersystems.com/pub/msm/docs/msm43/users.pdf
is another source for a manual.? It's the version which Micronetics sold, of which I heard "Micronetics shamelessly? copied DSM-11?practically line for line to the PC."??So the manual is probably close enough to work.
HTH,Dick
Hi all,
I'm using a HP 200LX to connect to a cc:Mail installation, with a null
modem cable. It has worked better before, but now I don't seem to be
able to connect at all. This is the output from the router, when
trying to connect from the 200LX:
| C:\CCMAIL\Router>C:\CCMAIL\Router\NTROUTER.EXE C:\CCDATA MODEM/PBX COM1 DIAGNOSTICS/F LOG/C:\CCMAIL\Router\ROUTER.LOG
| cc:Mail NT ROUTER Version 6.10.00.4
| Copyright (c) 1986, 1997 by cc:Mail, Inc. [...]
| Press Esc to terminate cc:Mail ROUTER program.
| Waiting to receive messages...
| 23/12/20 13:53:33 Answering call... 2 8 3a 74 68 8 2a 55 22 52 23
| 7d 18 80 from ~????`???f???????? ?`. Data connection not requested.
| 23/12/20 13:53:49 Ending connection.
| Waiting to receive messages...
| 23/12/20 13:53:55 Answering call... 2 8 3a 74 68 8 2a 55 22 52 23
| 7d 18 Data connection lost.
| 23/12/20 13:54:36 Ending connection.
| Waiting to receive messages...
The log files are empty. There are no other error messages anywhere
that I can see.
Anybody recognises anything? Any ideas about things I can try?
Here is the modem file:
| [attributes]
| MODELS=Null
| NULL MODEM=1
| [commands]
And another thing is that I only seem to be able to get a response at
1200 baud (the router default) by not specifying a speed when starting
the router. If I add the speed to the command line (the first line
above), any speed, (and the corresponding setting on the Palmtop) then
there is no connection at all.
It has worked better earlier. I managed to connect at 9600, but that
was a different PC. I am not aware of having changed anything relevant
on either PC or Palmtop.
Any help appreciated.
/Tomas
This may be old news -- it was new to me, though.
https://suddendisruption.blogspot.com/search/label/Booting%20Sage%20Computer
I'm not really familiar with SAGE machines. They were not as
well-known in the UK, I think, being upmarket from the Apple ][ and
IBM PC, both of which were eye-wateringly expensive by UK standards of
the time.
Also, they were terminal-based things and even back then I was
interested in boxes with graphics. :-)
--
Liam Proven ? Profile: https://about.me/liamproven
Email: lproven at cix.co.uk ? gMail/gTalk/gHangouts: lproven at gmail.com
Twitter/Facebook/LinkedIn/Flickr: lproven ? Skype: liamproven
UK: +44 7939-087884 ? ?R (+ WhatsApp/Telegram/Signal): +420 702 829 053
I'd like to get a Dilog SQ703 I have to work on my microvax, does
anybody know where I can get a copy of the manual?
cheers,
Nigel
--
Nigel Johnson, MSc., MIEEE, MCSE VE3ID/G4AJQ/VA3MCU
Amateur Radio, the origin of the open-source concept!
Skype: TILBURY2591 nw.johnson at ieee.org
> From: Steven Malikoff
> Would that be part of this system at a Japanese computer museum? ...
> the 11/05 has 'Unichannel15' on it
Yes, the 3 bays in the center are a PDP-15. (The indicator panel at the top
of the center bay is the one for the PDP-15 CPU; you can see it here:
http://ana-3.lcs.mit.edu/~jnc/tech/DECIndicatorPanels.html
at the top of the 'PDP-15' section.) The Unichannel 15:
https://gunkies.org/wiki/UNICHANNEL_15_System
is undoubtly there to drive the RK05; I don't think there's a native PDP-15
controller for that.
> There is an 11/15
??? Is that a typo for 'PDP-15'? The -11/15 looks just like an -11/20
https://www.ricomputermuseum.org/collections-gallery/equipment/dec-pdp-1115
except it only has 16 address switches, not 18 as on the /20. (The front panel
shown there has an OEM-specific re-paint; I couldn't quickly turn up an image
of a DEC /15 front panel.)
Noel
If anybody of you has been looking for a Bendix System or a CDC 160 console and has deep pockets: That's your opportunity ;)
ebay numbers 203239156838 and 203239181341
Not affiliated with the seller. Just saw the listings - can't believe that such cool systems are still stored in some warehouses in the U.S. for business purposes ...
Cheers,
Pierre
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.digitalheritage.de
> From: Ethan Dicks
> what are these found in?
The "Spare Module Handbook" lists:
RH11-AB
TM11, TMA11
MX11-B
Does _anyone_ actually have an MX11? Any documentation would also be welcome;
all I've been able to find out about it is a listing for the addresses of
control registers.
Noel
Anyone need/want a couple of these? Someone has a group of 5 for sale on eBait
(#184317666245), and I want a couple, but not _5_. The seller didn't respond
to a request to split up the lot, so I'd like to go in with a couple of other
people on the. Any takers?
Noel
Hello,
to fellow readers in Germany and surrounding areas:
HUGE 9406-F2, 300?, pickup in Heidelberg, Germany. Might be a Multiprocessor-Machine.
https://cgi.ebay.de/174577267021
I?m not related to the seller. Have seen this by chance.
I requested more photos to see what machine it is. Would be very sad if it will be scrapped. I can forward the additional photos as email on request.
:wq! PoC
Can someone check to see if a RQDX2 used the Western Digital chips to
interface to MFM drives? Reason I'm asking is the MFM emulator can
identify an RQDX3, and also a Pro/350 controller but this particular
RD52 I have (which was verified by me to run Digital Mumps) is reading as:
root at beaglebone:~/mfm# ./mfm_read -a
Board revision C detected
Found drive at select 3
Returning to track 0
Drive RPM 3525.4
Matches count 36 for controller WD_1006
Header CRC: Polynomial 0x1021 length 16 initial value 0xffff
Sector length 512
Data CRC: Polynomial 0x1021 length 16 initial value 0xffff
Interleave mismatch previous entry 0, 9 was 1 now 0
Selected head 8 found 0, last good head found 7
Read errors trying to determine sector numbering, results may be in error
Number of heads 8 number of sectors 18 first sector 0
Unable to determine interleave. Interleave value is not required
Drive supports buffered seeks (ST412)
Disk has recalibrated to track 0
Stopping end of disk search due to recalibration
Number of cylinders 512, 37.7 MB
Thanks!
CZ
An update on keyboard storage, which I asked about here last month.
I ordered some USPS Large Flat Rate Priority Mail "board game" boxes.
This is a size not usually available at the post office and come 25 in a
pack. They are a good size for mailing (and I am glad that I ordered
them so I can use them for that), but I don't think they work for
keyboard storage. They are so much larger than the keyboards that I am
storing that lots of packing material is needed so they don't move
around. Also, they are designed to be sealed and shipped, so there isn't
a convenient way to open them once they have been closed.
Next, I ordered the Uline keyboard boxes. I had to get 25 of them and
they are not free ($2.70 per box plus tax and shipping). They can be
open and closed. They are a much closer to the size of a keyboard
(surprise, surprise!) so not much packing material needed, but they are
slightly smaller than a Sun Type 5c (as well as Axil) keyboard and
needed to modified for those two. No modification needed to store a Sun
Type 4 or CompuAdd Sun-compatible keyboard in one. I haven't tried a Sun
Type 6 yet.
To anyone in the Seattle area that need keyboard boxes, I will probably
have 10-15 of them once I get all of my keyboards packed. If you would
like any, let me know.
alan
Anyone know who did/does the Altair peripheral emulator (not to be confused with the other APE, for Atari)?
Originator give me a ring on email or via discord please ?
J
Hi!
I'm trying to read possible Perq2 data off a 40mb Vertex V150 drive.
Unfortunately the switches were scrambled and I can't seem to figure out
which settings work. Does anyone have one that can check their switch
settings?
This doesn't seem to work:
https://stason.org/TULARC/pc/hard-drives-hdd/vertex/V150-43MB-5-25-FH-MFM-S…
On 1/3/21 8:40 AM, Peter Coghlan wrote:
> Grant,
Hi Peter,
> Do you think it is likely that an email address like
> check212014 at gmail.com is used by an actual real person for their
> personal email?
I absolutely do.
> Multiply the odds of the above by the odds that some spammer
> or other individual of malicious intent has had the capability,
> the persistence, tenacity and sheer ill will in them that it would
> take to carry out a vendetta against poor old check212014 at gmail.com
> for five long years, not to mention that when they only succeeed in
> causing check212014 at gmail.com any actual difficulty is on the rare
> occasions that their trawl of mail servers of the internet manages
> to turn up an actual open mail relay?
I know multiple people that have signed victims up to mailing lists --
many of which were questionable content -- as an attack on said victims.
Pretending to send email from said victims to cause bounces and ire to
be (mis)directed at them seems quite the same to me.
Five years? Sure. Many people will create filters and simply ignore
the messages. As such, it's effectively internet background radiation /
wasted bits.
> Whack-a-Mole works when everyone whacks their moles. When one major
> property owner decides they aren't going to whack the moles in their
> garden when all the neighbours keep theirs under control, they are
> going to end up with all the moles in their lawn. (We don't have
> real live moles in the part of the world were I am so please forgive
> me if my analogy is not accurate due to my lack of familiarity with
> the species.)
>
> I am not a lawyer but it appears to me that check212014 at gmail.com is
> doing nothing that violates Google's terms of service for using Gmail,
So ... by your own words, there is nothing that Google should be doing
per their terms of service.
> which indicates to me that the terms of service are flawed because
> they allow someone to use Google's infrastructure to scan for open
> relays to exploit as spam delivery platforms. As far as I know,
> no other email provider allows this.
I've not seen anything in any provider's terms of service that say
anything about what type of email they receive, save for exceedingly few
categories; child porn and illegal activity among the short list.
I have yet to see anybody state that sending an email to an invalid
email address and (potentially) receiving a bounce is illegal.
So, again, no grounds for Google to do anything.
Feel free to try to get Google to change their terms of service.
> I don't see how this relates to Google allowing their services to
> be used to test my mail server (and likely thousands of others too)
> numerous times over multiple years for being an open relay that could
> be exploited to distribute spam.
Are the messages /originating/ from Google / Gmail?
Or are the messages /originating/ from somewhere else and causing the
bounces to go to Google / Gmail?
The former is something Google cares about. The latter quite likely is not.
> If you burn a junk (snail) mail, could there be a security lapse in
> your furnace that would cause it to be replicated into a thousand
> copies of itself, run up your chimney and distribute itself into
> thousands of your neighbours letterboxes? If not, I think you can
> rest easy in the knowledge that you are not causing the problem.
The /recipient/ of the messages is *not* the problem. The /source/ of
the messages *is* the problem.
What is done with what is received is independent of the source of the
problem.
> Nothing. The problem is with the terms of service. This is where
> the evil is.
See above regarding terms of service.
> I feel obliged to try suggestions made in good faith, if nothing
> else just to prove they don't work. I made one general report
> regarding the issues with check212014 at gmail.com over the last
> five years using the form Mike suggested. Since then, there have
> been two further attempts to relay mail through my mail server to
> check212014 at gmail.com. I have made two specific reports using the
> form Mike suggested, providing all the details I have available to me.
Good for you. Thank you for trying to maintain the high road.
> Interestingly, both attempts were made from 37.46.150.239.
Full stop.
37.46.150.239 is *NOT* Google IP address space.
According to WhoIs, that address space belongs to Serverion BV.
So, chances are quite good that your reports to Google are going to be
silently dismissed because the source of the abuse does not originate
>from Google resources. If anything, Google's user is also a victim.
> The abuse contact email address for 37.46.150.239 listed in
> whois.ripe.net is abuse at serverion.com. I have had reason to send 13
> reports of abuse of my systems by various Serverion BV ip addresses to
> abuse at serverion.com during December alone. I have had zero response
> from them and the abuse from their ip address range continues daily.
Sadly, many companies leave a LOT to be desired when it comes to abuse
handling, especially when the abuse originates from their organization.
If you routinely have problems with Serverion, then I suggest you
consider blocking them.
> Guess who handles the mail service for abuse at serverion.com?
> Who enables Serverion BV to drop abuse reports in the bitbucket
> more likely. That's right, Google mail services. Why is this not
> a surprise to me?
Who handles Serverion's incoming email has exceedingly little to with
who's responsible for traffic originating from Serverion's network.
> Regards,
Likewise.
--
Grant. . . .
unix || die
This was a long day. Went over to the house and started working on
getting the Perqs out of the basement. I've been moving smaller stuff to
make room and it was time.
First up was a Perq1 chassis that just had the big disk drive in it,
side and rear panels. I figured it was lightest and after taking off the
sides and top was able to lift it and carry it up steps. Still heavy and
bulky, but it made room and a path to get to the second one.
The second one was a mess but a lot heavier: It still had the card cage
in it and I was not going to be able to lift. So I figured out how to
take the sides, top, front, back, and bottom (pounds are made of ounces)
and then spottted the screws that hold the card cage and power supply in
the box. Bless the people at perq, those two screws out and you can lift
the cage out the side of the box.
The card cage without cards (took them out to lighten) was heavy but I
got it up the steps. Then with a herculean amount of effort I managed to
carry the rest of the box up, followed by the sides, top, front, back,
and bottom plates.
There are still two more Perqs down there. They have heavier front
plates (I was able to take them off) with real shielding. They were
different designs, so they were not Perq1s and they are not the same as
each other.
Question: Are there any pictures of other types of Perqs?
Unfortunately they are still buried under old Sun gear and a Vaxserver
of some sort. So I'll have to think about those, but they will need to
come apart as well.
Question: Do the card cages and stuff come off the later Perqs as well?
Also got two different types of keyboards that say Perq, and a monitor
that looks like a big fat white Vetrex and says Three Rivers.
Question: What does a Perq mouse look like?
At least this stuff will not be junked. I'll take pictures and such
tomorrow and throw a tarp over everything tonight because I'm too tired
to get it out of the truck.
I swore off high-mass hobbies for a reason....
Probably read about this machine in Byte back
then but was programming PDP-11's. Was very
disappointed in IBM PC as IMO was far inferior to
PDP-11 which was was easier to interface to data
acquisition hardware and had a much nicer
instruction set. Ran into 68000 processor for
first time in 1986 when my father bought a 512 K
Mac and couldn't believe performance of this CPU
compared to PDP-11 - 24 bit addressing! and
inferior memory access to what Sage had. Also,
found 68000 instruction set very similar to
PDP-11 and had no trouble writing assembly code
for it a few years later and also really liked
Apple's debug switch which was best
implementation of a debugging system I've thus
far run into. Weird that Rod Coleman had 68000
instruction set associated with IBM 370 whereas
to me it was very PDP-11 like and 24 bit
addressing was a very nice feature (that was one similarity to IBM 360)
Other interesting aspect to SAGE history was the
influence of September 1966 issue of Scientific
American computer issue on Rod Coleman and lots
of other people I've talked to. Was so glad that
had this issue to read in 1966 and spent most of
my time in boring school classes designing logic
circuits and then building them at home using
discrete DTL logic with parts salvaged from surplus IBM boards.
Thanks for the link as didn't realize 68000 was
used for home systems before I ran into Mac.
>This may be old news -- it was new to me, though.
>
>https://suddendisruption.blogspot.com/search/label/Booting%20Sage%20Computer
>
>I'm not really familiar with SAGE machines. They were not as
>well-known in the UK, I think, being upmarket from the Apple ][ and
>IBM PC, both of which were eye-wateringly expensive by UK standards of
>the time.
>
>Also, they were terminal-based things and even back then I was
>interested in boxes with graphics. :-)
>
>--
>Liam Proven ? Profile: https://about.me/liamproven
>Email: lproven at cix.co.uk ? gMail/gTalk/gHangouts: lproven at gmail.com
>Twitter/Facebook/LinkedIn/Flickr: lproven ? Skype: liamproven
>UK: +44 7939-087884 ? ??R (+ WhatsApp/Telegram/Signal): +420 7002 829 053
I know this is a long shot, but I'm asking anyhow.
I'm looking for the Ops Manual for a Winsystems single-board system.
Model: SAT-V40
P/N: 400-0186-000
The SAT-V41 model is essentially the same board, so I'd settle for
docs for that. There are references (from 2012) to SAT-V41.PDF, so I
know it at least *did* exist in digital form.
If anyone in the US has the paper manual I would happily scan it, and
pay postage both ways.
Thanks!
Doc
Come join us on Zoom tonight at 9pm EST for our annual end of year show as we engage in a TRS-80 community retrospective of 2020 and talk about where we want to see the community go in 2021.
Email for Zoom details: trs80trashtalk at gmail.com <mailto:trs80trashtalk at gmail.com>
Or you can watch on our YouTube channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXkGugvdCkpkMDylVQb9gfg <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXkGugvdCkpkMDylVQb9gfg>
But, it?s much more fun interacting on Zoom, so join us!
You don?t have to be a TRS-80 enthusiast to join.
Later,
Pete
Hi,
In cleaning up my lab and stores, I have discovered that I have a tube of 10
of these chips.
I'm not quite sure what they are for or were used in (or even where I got
them). Anyway,
if they are, in fact, for managing 3270 mainframe terminal traffic, they're
probably not of
much use to me. I've also noticed that I'm getting very low in vintage 4000
series CMOS
chips. Anybody want to trade?
Bill S.
--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
I finally got around to completing the processing of the scanned images of the
pages of the MM11-F manual and engineering drawings. A PDF is available here:
http://ana-3.lcs.mit.edu/~jnc/tech/pdp11/dload/DEC-11-HMFA-D_MM11-F_Manual.…http://ana-3.lcs.mit.edu/~jnc/tech/pdp11/dload/DEC-11-HMFA-D_MM11-F_Drawing…
For those who object to PDF/A, here:
http://ana-3.lcs.mit.edu/~jnc/tech/pdp11/dload/MM11-F_Manual.tarhttp://ana-3.lcs.mit.edu/~jnc/tech/pdp11/dload/MM11-F_Drawings.tar
are TARs of the original TIFFs.
The images aren't that great, I see; the original paper copies aren't too hot,
IIRC. If anyone actually has a use for these (does anyone out there _actually
have_ an MM11-F?), and there's a problem, let me know, and once I get my
scanner running again, I can try and get better ones.
I thought we were missing the MM11-E manual, so since the two are so similar
(most of the boards are the same) I thought the MM11-F's would mostly fill the
gap, but it appears it's there, prepended to the MM11-E prints.
One thing this set has which might be useful is the backplane wirelist (the
MM11-E's seems to be missing); given the commonality of most of the boards
>from the MM11-E to the MM11-F, they're probably very similar.
Noel
The terminals wiki (https://terminals-wiki.org) seems to have been down for several months.? I hope the maintainer is OK.
Does anyone know if this site is gone for good??? Is there a mirror anywhere?? The wayback machine has a few pages, but mostly serves to capture the look&feel.
Dave
All;
I seek a copy (hard or electronic) of the "TMS32010 Assembly Language
Programmer's Guide" (1983).
Paperback : 194 pages
ISBN-10 : 0904047423
ISBN-13 : 978-0904047424
Publisher : Texas Instruments (December 1, 1983)
Item Weight : 1.11 pounds
Language: : English
The "TMS32010 User's Guide" (1985) is readily available. Not so the (more
important!) Programmer's Guide :-{.
I recently obtained a TMS 32010 Evaluation Module (EVM). So I'm motivated
to "learn something" about the details of programming the TMS 32010. My
first hands-on foray into the (early) world of DSP :-}.
I've searched all of the nooks-n-crannies of the web to no avail.
All help in locating/obtaining a copy of this document will be greatly
appreciated.
I do have a copy of "Digital Signal Processing Using TMS32010" (Douglas L.
Jones) on order as a stop-gap measure.
Thank you,
paul
Hey all --
Discovered a broken wirewrap wire on the 11/70 I'm slowly working on, it's
on the last slot (44), and runs from BD2 to ??. White wire, part of a
white/black twisted pair. I've been looking but haven't found a wire list
for the backplane -- anyone have any leads, or, alternately, does anyone
have ready access to an 11/70 backplane to trace where the wire from BD2 on
slot 44 goes to? (Fortunately it looks like there's just the one wire on
that pin, though there might be one "below" it on the pin that I can't
quite see, rather cramped in there.)
Thanks as always,
Josh
Hi,
I have noticed the same email addresses' messages routinely end up in the
spam folder of gmail. It's no big deal for me to check my spam folder but
it's an extra step and messages can be lost.
For those of you who run your own mail servers please consider updating
your DNS / authentication to match gmail standards.
It's not about making a filter or marking messages as "not spam". It's
about how the sending mail server communicates with gmail and the "newer"
mail server gateway protocols, etc. so that it's not necessary to make a
filter in the first place.'
There are a lot of how-to's on the web, each mail server is different and
there is no simple fix that applies to all.
Bill
> From: Antonio Carlini
> It was (iirc) described in DEC STD 012 (the part numbering standard) ...
> I do have (or did have) a DEC STDs CD at one point, but my copy of that
> seems to be missing DEC STD 012. ... I've no idea why this one might be
> missing.
It looks like you already uploaded it to Manx:
https://manx-docs.org/collections/antonio/dec/standards/el-00012-00-0000.pdf
Looking though that led me to DEC STD 012-2 "Unified Numbering Code for Part
Identifier Class Codes":
https://manx-docs.org/collections/antonio/dec/standards/el-00012-02-0000.pdf
which was exactly what I wanted. It's not the thing I remembered, but as DEC's
official list, in some ways it's better (although it's so detailed it's kind
of overkill :-)!
> From: Vincent Slyngstad
> the "Spare Parts List" links on this page are relevant:
Volume II had a brief but early 'class code' list; I made good use of it.
Thanks everone! Much appreciated!
Noel
Hi,
I modified vtserver to work on pdp11/34 and similar - the older machines
that have the
000000 000000 000000 000000
@
odt prompt.
I'm afraid I didn't do a very thorough job (hack night and just wanted to
get it working) and in retrospect I wish I would've made a conditional
argument to put it in this mode. Perhaps we should collaborate on adding
this properly and adding other desirable features like compression for
incoming "all zero" blocks when pulling images in from real hardware, etc.
It's here if you'd like to use it:
https://github.com/jritorto/vtserver
You can run it with ./a.out -odt to facilitate its talking to the pdp at
power-on and loading its initial boot sequence via odt in octal. You have
to run the primary bootstrap with L 140000 and S <return> because I botched
the parsing a bit in my rush to get things going.
thx
jake
Well, after waiting almost a month for the USPS to deliver a "Priority
Mail 1 day" package from Dave I now have the MFM reader card. So I
started working on these disks I rescued. First up was a ST506 (labelled
"RD50" by DEC) and a pair of ST412's.
Bad news: No drives spun up
Good news: You can take the controller board off the drives and spin the
spindles by hand.
Better news: The spindles spun (clockwise, viewed from bottom)
Best news: spinning while powering on got all three to spin up.
So far I imaged the RD50 (possibly a Rainbow or a Pro/350) and one of
the ST412's. It came up as a PERQ_T2 format and I have two dumps of the
disk with only one bad sector reported.
Anyone know what to do with this kind of image? I've powered down the
drives and will store them till I can figure out how to make them run
more quietly....
C
Hey all --
A straight TI 980 (not one of the later 980A or 980B variants) appeared on
my doorstep this afternoon. While well-shipped, the person I got it from
decided to ship the boards and power supply separately from the chassis --
and unfortunately didn't document where anything goes.
There is precious little information out there about the original 980 --
anyone sitting on any documentation? Anyone know someone who has one?
(Anyone have any spare parts? The core memory boards & chassis are labeled
well enough for me to see that I'm missing one of the "DA" boards...)
Thanks,
Josh
Anyone recognize this card:
https://www.ebay.com/itm/313323417718
I looked, and it doesn't seem to be any of those for a PDP-11. However, I
see the DRAM array is 12x4 chips, which makes me think it might be for a
PDP-8?
Noel
Hi all,
Does anybody here know what "8041 Error: did not respond to 0AAH
command" might mean?
(p. 70 in the HP OmniBook 300, 425, 430, 530 Service Manual)
/Tomas
Chris,
I could use one. I have an h-11 system that has issues with the h-27 system.
Please contact me off list.
Gary
Gary at realtimecomp.com
-------- Original message --------
From: Chris Zach via cctalk <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Date: 12/27/20 4:42 PM (GMT-05:00)
To: CCTalk mailing list <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Subject: Does anyone have an H11 and need a H27 card?
I have one, and if someone needs to to complete their collection I'd
rather it goes there. If you just want to put it on Ebay pls don't
bother as I can do that but if you really need one let me know.
CZ
Did you need my address Chris?? Thanks Ed#
On Sunday, December 27, 2020 ED SHARPE <couryhouse at aol.com> wrote:
We have a heath h11 that could u se one at smecc museum.project...Chris.? Thanks ed drop ne a lune offlist... thanks....Ed#
On Sunday, December 27, 2020 Gary L. Messick via cctalk <Gary at realtimecomp.com; cctalk at classiccmp.org> wrote:
Chris,
I could use one.? I have an h-11 system that has issues with the h-27 system.
Please contact me off list.
Gary
Gary at realtimecomp.com
-------- Original message --------
From: Chris Zach via cctalk <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Date: 12/27/20 4:42 PM (GMT-05:00)
To: CCTalk mailing list <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Subject: Does anyone have an H11 and need a H27 card?
I have one, and if someone needs to to complete their collection I'd
rather it goes there. If you just want to put it on Ebay pls don't
bother as I can do that but if you really need one let me know.
CZ
All H- computers. Are welcome!
Well.. we want to show the entire product line. We have a hero robot too.
.
All we need is the h89 and stuff to finish out the h89 drive subsystem? for h11 and make it work... this board is a game changer..
It would be nice?? to gave heath analog? computer also .... anyone recomend? any other adds we may have overlooked ?? Thanks Ed#
On Monday, December 28, 2020 Bill Gunshannon via cctalk <bill.gunshannon at hotmail.com; cctalk at classiccmp.org> wrote:
On 12/28/20 7:45 PM, ED SHARPE via cctalk wrote:
>
> I am trying to have cplete. H8 h11 and h89 tjus the need for the pardon I requested
>
While I have always wanted the H-11 and the H-8 I can honestly say
I was never impressed or interested in the H-89.
bill