Thanks to everyone who responded. (And for the pointer to the BA11-N prints;
I had that print set, just hadn't look all the way through it! Although I still
hope a copy of the Tech Manual shows up some day.)
> From: Pete Turnbull
> For each BDAL line I used a suitable length of wire-wrap wire to run
> the length of the bus plus an allowance to wind once round each pin. I
> stripped somewhat over an inch of of insulation from the end, then used
> the stripper to separate the remaining insulation everywhere it would
> solder to a pin. Soldered one end, wind once round every succeeding
> pin, and soldered each.
Thanks for that tip - I had been planning on using separate lengths, but one
piece made a lot more sense. (Although I used wire from a 25-pair telephone
cable - I like working with that, it takes solder very easily, which not all
wire wrap wire will.)
Noel
Just wondering if anyone has (or can point me to) any technical information
about Mayflower's MFE 750 and MFE 751 8 inch floppy drives.
I have one of each of these drives, and am looking for information about the
configurations settings etc.
Regards, Malcolm.
> I have verified that the CD part of the backplane is identical in both
(the
> 1983-84 Microcomputer Interfaces Handbook, EB-23144-18, has pinouts for
> the CD
> part for both, and they are indeed identical). Alas, I cannot find
detailed
> data on the rest of the H9273-A: neither the BA11-N Technical Manual, nor
> the
> Print Set, is available online. (I found some old list email which
> indicates
> that someone named David Powell had a copy of the TM - does anyone know
> him?)
>
> Noel
>
Hi Noel, there are H9273/H9273A PCB layouts and wiring diagrams at pages
41-51 of the "PDP11/23 Field Maintenance Print Set". A Google search for
"MP00740_1123_schem_Oct81" will bring it up on Bitsavers.
Malcolm
Hi
I am a model railroader (in HO scale) and use a digital controller from
the 1980s. The controller is a Hornby UK, Zero 1. This device is based
around the TMS1000NLP and has been excellent value over 30 years. The
only small improvement I would like to make is to increase the number of
locomotive addresses to above the current limit of 16. (because of4-bit
chip).
The TMS1000 has a masked program (MP0186) and the ram can be dumped in 2
ways, by removing physically the top of the chip and photographing etc.
The second option is dumping code via the test mode, as mentioned in TI
literature.
I would like to be able to discuss with someone about instructions to
use the Test Mode etc. Also I would like to locate a list of the TI
TMS1000 programs MP**** (incl the MP0186 above)
Dave Caroline was good enough to direct me to this mailing list.
Thankyou
Charles Harris
NZ
Hi all --
The CPU in the 11/05 seems to be behaving nicely as far as I can tell,
now that the Microcode ROMs are no longer filled with bogus data. It
will run small programs I've toggled in without issue, and so I've moved
on to testing the memory.
Basic testing (via the simple address test listed here:
http://www.psych.usyd.edu.au/pdp-11/hints.html) reveals that most of the
8KW of core (H215) and controller is working pretty well, except for a
128 byte range between 012000(8) and 012200(8). Within this range, all
words read back as all zeros regardless of what is written.
Given the nature of the fault, I tend to think that this is not an
addressing problem or an issue with the core drivers -- if it was any of
these I'd expect the fault to repeat across the memory space in a
pattern, rather than being isolated to a single contiguous block of
memory. If that's true, then it seems that the core plane itself might
be at fault. Which doesn't surprise me, I'm actually surprised it works
at all -- when the /05 arrived the H215 core memory board was loose,
banging around inside the chassis.
Does my initial analysis seem reasonable? Anyone have any experience
debugging one of these and have any tips to share?
Thanks,
Josh
On Thu Jun 19 10:28:44 CDT 2014, Zane Healy <healyzh at aracnet.com> wrote:
>On Jun 19, 2014, at 8:14 AM, Glen Slick <glen.slick at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 7:53 AM, Zane Healy <healyzh at aracnet.com>
wrote:
>>>
>>> Yes, yes, and yes. I did this 15+ years ago, you're making me feel
old. :-(
>>>
>>> You need the following:
>>> 1. A high enough version of the EPROM
>>> 2. A PAL Fuse Map for burning a PAL that will allow the board to act as
a QDT controller (Disk and Tape)
>>> 3. A special cable that allows you to connect a Serial Terminal
>>> 4. Instructions on how to get into the hidden menu to configure the
board
>>>
>>> I should have #4, but I have no clue as to where it is. The person I
knew that had #2 lost that data in a fire years ago. I seem to recall
hearing about someone jury-rigging #3, I used the pr\
oper cable and bulkhead plate.
>>>
>>
>> If you burned your own PAL yourself and you didn't secure the PAL (or
>> does a PAL16L8 even have a security fuse?) then even if the known PAL
>> Fuse Map was lost I would assume that it could just be read back from
>> the PALs on the boards you have, along with dumping the firmware
>> EPROMs as well.
>>
>> -Glen
>
>The person that burned the PAL's is the person that had the fire.
>
>Zane
I have had some progress in this matter:
I got a reply to the letter I sent to folks at tdsys.com. The gentleman had
forwarded to the designer of the Viking series of adapter boards and to the
lady that was working with configuration of products. He had not yet go a
reply from them.
I also checked how the address decoding PAL is connected and I now
understand that it has two outputs, connected to another PAL chip and then
16 inputs. These 16 inputs are the 4 jumpers and also BDAL02-BDAL12 and
also the BBS7 signal. Looks quite reasonable being an address decoding
chip. I more or less presume that the reason for two outputs is that one is
for disk and one is for tape. I have to verify that by reverse engineer the
actual content of the PAL using a small arduino board.
You mention that there is a special way of accessing the configuration
menu. It make sense since when I examine the board more carefully I
discover a small serial EEPROM that might be used for storing the
configuration. It would be really interesting to get more info about how to
access this secret menu! Anyone else out there that knows about this?
I have the cab kit for it. It has a DB25 connector as well as a 50 pin male
IDC connector. But there is also pads for a 10 pin connector that seems to
be for the second serial port. What is the use for this second serial port?
The board has a Signetics SCN2681 DUART chip so it definitely has two
serial ports.
Regarding versions of the firmware. My firmware is 4.0 :
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/96935524/Datormusuem/Viking_Q_B_A4.0.bin
Zane, Pontus: What is your version?
Mattis Lind
> From: Jay West
> Ensure that if you ever no longer wish to keep the machine that it
> winds up in the hands of another collector
This all seems eminently reasonable, but I had one question/clarification,
about the above: what about museums?
In other collecting fields I am aware of (Asian art, old racing cars, steam
locomotives) there are a range of opinions about giving things to museums. (I
personally don't have any strong feelings / axes to grind either way on these
issues, merely raise them as I know there is debate on them in other field.)
One issue with museums is that a lot of their holdings are stored out of
sight, never to be seen by the ordinary public, and in that case, they might
as well be with a collector who can enjoy them, and show them.
The other issue (only with the cars and locos) is that some museums have a
strict 'conserve it exactly as it was' policy, and since these things were
intended to be _used_, an old race car/loco that's been 'stuffed and mounted
on a plinth' (as the phrase goes in loco preservation) is akin to a zoo full
of stuffed and mounted animals.
Yes, using them can cause them to wear out (although there are rare counter-
examples - John Harrison's sea-going clocks H1 through H3 are allowed to run,
as their bearings, etc are thought to have indefinite life-times - which is
not the case with H4, his first chronometer, which is displayed stopped), and
also, to get one running may require replacement of some parts (although one
can always save the old parts, for historical purposes).
Like I said, I can see both sides - just wondered what the feeling was about
this.
Noel
Hi all --
I have the opportunity to pick up a Ridge 32/330, which looks like a pretty
interesting 32-bit server/workstation from the mid-80s. It looks seriously
cool, but I'm a bit hesitant to jump on it since it's a pretty large
machine (well, relatively speaking...) that I haven't been able to find
much information about. I have a few *other* interesting machines that are
basically doorstops due to lack of media and documentation, I'm not sure I
need another to add to that category :).
What say you, O Internet Collective?
Thanks,
Josh
> From: David Riley
> I think most if not all Qbus backplanes were PCBs. But some of them
> (notably the H9270) are PCBs with wire-wrap posts for the connector
> terminals. Makes it very handy to, say, modify the H9270 for 22-bit,
> which I did .. with no problem.
This reminds me of something I'm looking into. I have a BA11-N (Q18/CD) which
I'd like to upgrade to BA11-S (Q22/CD). (Yes, yes, I know, the -S has a
oomphier power supply, which I won't have, but I'm not trying to run a lot of
power-hungry cards.)
I've tried finding an H9276-A backplane (Q22/CD) to go in it, to replace its
existing H9273-A (Q18/CD), but _every_ place I called which had one listed
reasonably cheap (<$100), and which claimed their internal stock database
(i.e. not just their lame, useless, Web-site) showed they had one... when they
checked the actual shelf, they did not in fact have any.
So now I'm thinking, maybe I'll just add the BDAL19-22 lines to the existing
H9273-A. It doesn't have wirewrap pins, but there's enough pin showing that I
can get two wires onto each pin, and solder them; does not look to be
difficult at all.
I have verified that the CD part of the backplane is identical in both (the
1983-84 Microcomputer Interfaces Handbook, EB-23144-18, has pinouts for the CD
part for both, and they are indeed identical). Alas, I cannot find detailed
data on the rest of the H9273-A: neither the BA11-N Technical Manual, nor the
Print Set, is available online. (I found some old list email which indicates
that someone named David Powell had a copy of the TM - does anyone know him?)
So, has anyone tried to upgrade an H9273-A to H9276-A, and are there any
pitfalls? From what I can see, there shouldn't be a problem, but I'd like
to be 100% sure before I start plugging cards into it...
Noel
It was recently pointed out to me that my DECwriter II (LA36) has
holes drilled on the bottom of the stand to accept pads or casters.
Does anyone know the measurement and thread size of those holes? I'm
willing to use DIY-store parts to make these beasts mobile. No
DEC-original parts needed.
The DECwriter III (LA120) also appears to have the same holes. Are
they the same size as the LA36's?
Worst case, they can go on furniture dollies, but I'd like to try
doing it "right" first.
TIA
- jht