On 12/07/2018 11:38 AM, Rod G8DGR via cctalk wrote:
> Oh good how do you set them to 110 baud?
>
Oh, WOW! Good catch, it only goes down to 300 baud! major
screwup, ought to be reported to the developers.
Jon
Will be having some extra brochures for plated memory from Memory systems Inc.? in El Segundo Calif. Available soon.? appears? to? be? from month? 4? of? 1973? and? 3? different? ?sheets? both? sides.
?
I? know? about? core memory? but this is? something? I never? used..
?
these may be out there already? somewhere? ? ??
?
Ed#
?
?
Hi All,
I have a PDP-8/e that's missing the knob on the front panel.
Does anyone have a spare for sale, or know of a compatible part?
Looking up the DEC parts numbers has turned up nothing but the
engineering drawings...
I've never seen another one in person so I can't tell if the knob is meant
to attach to a shaft on the rotary switch, or if the knob itself is meant
to have a shaft. Either way, I'm lacking both, so have been making do with
a screw wrapped in tape.
Regards,
-Tom
mosst at sdf.lonestar.org
SDF Public Access UNIX System - http://sdf.lonestar.org
Teraterm on Windows definitely goes to 110 baud. I use it all the time...
Rob.
On 12/7/2018 10:38 AM, Rod G8DGR via cctalk wrote:
> Oh good how do you set them to 110 baud?
> Rod
>
>
> Sent from Mail for Windows 10
Listed these on eBay a few times. No takers.
Being offered here for the price of USPS Media Mail cost. Total of 52 lbs of
books in 2 boxes. I estimate shipping at $137.
Price will be actual shipping cost payable by PayPal.
See books at http://www.myimagecollection.com/ITBooks/
Slides pause for 5 seconds each or you can click the Pause button.
No pressure but they hit the trashcan 12/14/2018. J
> From: Paul Birkel
>> I thought RL0x drives use an IBM 5440 type pack (as used on the IBM
>> System/3 .... DEC may have used their own format (and servo track
>> stuff), I don't know much about the 5440.
> Sounds to me like it was different, but in a good way?
I took a look, and found a manual for a 5440:
http://bitsavers.org/pdf/ibm/system3/GA33-3002-0_5444_5440_ComponentsDescr_…
and the details (format, etc) are indeed different. The packs are physically
compatible, but that's as far as it goes.
Noel
The MAME folks have the 68K versions of the terminals mostly working in simulation
now, and are wondering if anyone could dump the firmware from the 88K model, which
has a similar hardware design.
tip is the standard BSD program for calling other unix systems. It's a fine
terminal program. 'tip -110 com1' is all you'd need to do in this case :).
Warner
On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 10:39 AM Rod G8DGR <rodsmallwood52 at btinternet.com>
wrote:
> Er whats tip?
>
>
>
>
>
> Sent from Mail <https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for
> Windows 10
>
>
>
> *From: *Warner Losh via cctalk <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
> *Sent: *07 December 2018 17:36
> *To: *systems_glitch <systems.glitch at gmail.com>; General Discussion:
> On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
> *Subject: *Re: PDP-8/e
>
>
>
> These days I just use tip.
>
>
>
> Warner
>
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 7, 2018, 10:25 AM systems_glitch via cctalk <
>
> cctalk at classiccmp.org wrote:
>
>
>
> > Indeed, unless you need character pacing.
>
> >
>
> > Thanks,
>
> > Jonathan
>
> >
>
> > On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 12:13 PM Guy Sotomayor Jr via cctalk <
>
> > cctalk at classiccmp.org> wrote:
>
> >
>
> > > I just use ?cat?. Seems to work fine. ;-)
>
> > >
>
> > > TTFN - Guy
>
> > >
>
> > > > On Dec 7, 2018, at 4:57 AM, Pete Turnbull via cctalk <
>
> > > cctalk at classiccmp.org> wrote:
>
> > > >
>
> > > > On 07/12/2018 09:59, Rod G8DGR via cctalk wrote:
>
> > > >
>
> > > >> OK now I need a little help.
>
> > > >> Does anybody know of a terminal emulation program that will simulate
>
> > > the reader on an ASR33?
>
> > > >> I know about RIM and BIN loaders but how and what to feed them I
>
> > have
>
> > > long forgotten
>
> > > >
>
> > > > For a Unix or Linux machine, there's send and rsend, and several
> other
>
> > > utilities, that you can find at Kevin McQuiggin's web page:
>
> > > > http://highgate.comm.sfu.ca/pdp8/
>
> > > > and on mine:
>
> > > > http://www.dunnington.info/public/PDP-8/
>
> > > >
>
> > > > --
>
> > > > Pete
>
> > > > Pete Turnbull
>
> > >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 4:39 AM Liam Proven via cctalk <
> cctalk at classiccmp.org>
> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 6 Dec 2018 at 12:44, Tony Duell <ard.p850ug1 at gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > I don't think anyone is questioning that it's a workstation, and that
> it
> > was made by Sun.
> > >
> > > I think the problem is over 'first' and that a Sun-2 is not going to be
> > the 'first' model.
> >
> > Ah! Excellent point. I have to admit, I was totally unfamiliar with
> > the very early Sun products. I was happy with my little ZX Spectrum
> > back then, and being about 14, wasn't paying much attention to the
> > world of academic Unix usage. :-)
> >
> > Looking up the SUN-1, I see that it lacked a graphics adapter, and was
> > a text-only machine. I didn't know that. That alone means that it's
> > not really what I think of when I think of a Sun workstation: no
> > windowing system means that for me it's not really a workstation.
>
> The Sun-1 absolutely had a framebuffer and a display and was not a
> text-only machine, it did 1024x800 at 1bpp, had a mouse, the whole deal.
>
> See the picture in this article, for example:
> https://www.britannica.com/topic/Sun-Microsystems-Inc
I can 100% confirm this. I have a Sun 1/100 that runs just fine...and it
fires up Suntools with mouse and windows... Windowing pretty much the same
as any other
Sun running circa Sun OS 3.2 It came standard with B/W framebuffer. I
also have the color framebuffer option (not currently installed... don't
have a monitor that
works with that) The base system has a monitor that does what looks like
the standard Sun 1152x900 resolution (I've not confirmed that but sure
looks the same as my other early Suns...)
Earl
I thought folk might enjoy this short-ish (~12min) Youtube video
showing startup of arguably the first ever Sun workstation, from a
contemporaneous SunOS... I did.
Permission obtained before x-posting, naturally.
--
Liam Proven - Profile: https://about.me/liamproven
Email: lproven at cix.co.uk - Google Mail/Hangouts/Plus: lproven at gmail.com
Twitter/Facebook/Flickr: lproven - Skype/LinkedIn: liamproven
UK: +44 7939-087884 - ?R (+ WhatsApp/Telegram/Signal): +420 702 829 053
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Walter Belgers <walter+rescue at belgers.com>
Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2018 at 12:34
Subject: Re: [rescue] Sun2/120 SunOS 3.2 suntools movie (was: advise
on Sun2 disk install)
To: The Rescue List <rescue at sunhelp.org>
Hi,
Another update in case you are interested:
I rescued a keyboard and mouse to go with the Sun2. I also installed SunOS 3.2
on disk. I took a different route: I installed FreeBSD, installed tme on top
of that and using the information at
https://people.csail.mit.edu/fredette/tme/
<https://people.csail.mit.edu/fredette/tme/>,
http://www.heeltoe.com/index.php?n=Retro.Sun2
<http://www.heeltoe.com/index.php?n=Retro.Sun2> and
http://typewritten.org/Projects/Sun/8-4841.html
<http://typewritten.org/Projects/Sun/8-4841.html> I installed SunOS 3.2 from
virtual tapes onto a virtual harddrive. I then copied the virtual drive to a
real drive and hooked it up. I could then boot SunOS 3.2!
I then took the one TTL monitor I have (for the 2/50) and hooked it up to a
bwtwo. At first it did not work, apparently it must be in a specific slot. I
added 1MB as well, so the cage is fully populated. That extra MB is used by
the btwo. The monitor still worked and I was able to run the graphical
windowing system.
I had the system on the internet for a couple of hours yesterday, some people
logged in remotely and it still felt surprisingly fast. Only when you start
hammering the disk it is slow (SCSI-1 is slower than ESDI drives I read).
I made a movie of the box, it can be viewed here: https://youtu.be/CoAYs0Uc7As
<https://youtu.be/CoAYs0Uc7As>
Cheers,
Walter.
_______________________________________________
rescue list - http://www.sunhelp.org/mailman/listinfo/rescue
What are people doing for early Sun monitor replacements? I've got a Sun
3/60 that I'd like to hook up to a modern monitor, but am unaware of any
means of doing so.
Thanks!
Kyle
On 12/07/2018 03:59 AM, Rod G8DGR via cctalk wrote:
>
> Does anybody know of a terminal emulation program that will simulate the reader on an ASR33?
> I know about RIM and BIN loaders but how and what to feed them I have long forgotten
> My PDP-8 course completion certificate is dated November 1975.
>
> Rod Smallwood
>
>
>
> Sent from Mail for Windows 10
>
>
I use minicom on Linux, but don't know if a Windows version
is available. It has allowed me to connect to a bunch of
older devices and send data back and forth.
Jon
Several years ago when I restored my 8/M, I whipped up
a quick and dirty program that uses TCL/Tk to make a
little graphical interface for selecting, reading, and punching
paper tape images. When running, it looks something
like this:
https://www.cs.drexel.edu/~bls96/museum/asrscreen.jpg
You need the P9P (Plan9 from user space) libraries installed
to build it, but I could whip up a binary for you if you'd like
to try it out. I typically run it in a shell script that looks like:
#!/bin/sh
xterm -vb -sb -geom +180+10 -fg '#D0D0FF' -bg black -e asr33 $*
BLS
--------------------------------------------
On Fri, 12/7/18, Rod G8DGR via cctalk <cctalk at classiccmp.org> wrote:
Subject: PDP-8/e
To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts" <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Date: Friday, December 7, 2018, 4:59 AM
Hi All
? Seasons Greetings..
My PDP-8/e was long due for a major
overhaul.
1. So everything out
2. Big Hoover job on the Omnibus
3. Bring up on Variac ? No smoke
4. Check? PSU volts. ? All OK
5. Power off
6. Install minimal System ? Front
Panel, Three CPU cards, RFI shield,? 4k Core and Bus
term.
7. Yup all looks in right order
8. Power on
9. Toggle in standard AC count up
program
10. Clear + Cont
11. And they are racing at
Rockingham!!
12. Yup counts up just like it should.
13. Let it run for a while.
14. All stop.
15. PSU off
16. Inset Async Card (Its 110 baud
only)
17. Fire up VT100. Beep - yup its
alive.
18. Toggle in keyboard echo test.
19. Clear + Cont ? Program runs
20. And .. yes keyboard gets echoed
back.
OK now I need a little help.
Does anybody know of a terminal
emulation program that will simulate the reader on an
ASR33?
I know about? RIM and BIN loaders
but how and what to feed them I have long forgotten
My PDP-8 course completion certificate
is dated November 1975.
Rod Smallwood
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
Congrats!!
On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 3:59 AM Rod G8DGR via cctalk <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
wrote:
>
> Hi All
> Seasons Greetings..
>
> My PDP-8/e was long due for a major overhaul.
> 1. So everything out
> 2. Big Hoover job on the Omnibus
> 3. Bring up on Variac ? No smoke
> 4. Check PSU volts. ? All OK
> 5. Power off
> 6. Install minimal System ? Front Panel, Three CPU cards, RFI shield, 4k
> Core and Bus term.
> 7. Yup all looks in right order
> 8. Power on
> 9. Toggle in standard AC count up program
> 10. Clear + Cont
> 11. And they are racing at Rockingham!!
> 12. Yup counts up just like it should.
> 13. Let it run for a while.
> 14. All stop.
> 15. PSU off
> 16. Inset Async Card (Its 110 baud only)
> 17. Fire up VT100. Beep - yup its alive.
> 18. Toggle in keyboard echo test.
> 19. Clear + Cont ? Program runs
> 20. And .. yes keyboard gets echoed back.
>
> OK now I need a little help.
> Does anybody know of a terminal emulation program that will simulate the
> reader on an ASR33?
> I know about RIM and BIN loaders but how and what to feed them I have
> long forgotten
> My PDP-8 course completion certificate is dated November 1975.
>
> Rod Smallwood
>
>
>
> Sent from Mail for Windows 10
>
>
Hi All
Seasons Greetings..
My PDP-8/e was long due for a major overhaul.
1. So everything out
2. Big Hoover job on the Omnibus
3. Bring up on Variac ? No smoke
4. Check PSU volts. ? All OK
5. Power off
6. Install minimal System ? Front Panel, Three CPU cards, RFI shield, 4k Core and Bus term.
7. Yup all looks in right order
8. Power on
9. Toggle in standard AC count up program
10. Clear + Cont
11. And they are racing at Rockingham!!
12. Yup counts up just like it should.
13. Let it run for a while.
14. All stop.
15. PSU off
16. Inset Async Card (Its 110 baud only)
17. Fire up VT100. Beep - yup its alive.
18. Toggle in keyboard echo test.
19. Clear + Cont ? Program runs
20. And .. yes keyboard gets echoed back.
OK now I need a little help.
Does anybody know of a terminal emulation program that will simulate the reader on an ASR33?
I know about RIM and BIN loaders but how and what to feed them I have long forgotten
My PDP-8 course completion certificate is dated November 1975.
Rod Smallwood
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
I bought this and a line clock module on eBay and it turns out the person I got it for
only needed the clock, so it's available for $50 plus shipping
You need this if you're going to try to run Unix on an 11/35 or 40 and they are pretty
tough to find.
Hello David
I saw your posting on the cctalk mailing list regarding RSX180.
It is Hector Peraza that's been tinkering with this. He intends making the
full source-code available via SourceForge or GitHub but is still working
on preliminary web pages and documenting etc. No doubt he will provide you
with more details.
I've been tinkering with a Z280 system designed by Bill Shen (the Z280RC on
the RetroBrew web site at
https://www.retrobrewcomputers.org/doku.php?id=builderpages:plasmo:z280rc )
and have contacted Hector about porting it to the Z280.
A Z180 system is also on my hobbyist "to-do" list. Should you decide to
produce another run I'd be interested in one. Most likely I'd use a
CompactFlash on IDE interface and an GoTek style floppy emulator with it.
--
Tony Nicholson <tony.nicholson at computer.org>
I don't know who did it, but here's a video of a P112 running RSX:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5s6IOCCk3Uw
If the creator of this thing is reading, I'd very much like to get my
hands on RSX-180 and put it up on the P112 page at Sourceforge, Gitlab,
et al.
--
David Griffith
dave at 661.org
A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
The re-work of that Dallas nvram chip is just beautiful. It makes me
ashamed of myself. (I just chopped into the epoxy with a pocket knife,
soldered two leads, and velcroed the new batteries somewhere inside the
machine I installed it in.)
I salute you sir.
Jeff
At 12:24 PM 4/12/2018 -0800, you wrote:
>On Mon, Dec 3, 2018 at 5:09 AM Christian Corti via cctalk <
>cctalk at classiccmp.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> how does one open a RL02 disk pack? A couple of packs need cleaning but I
>> can't figure out how to open them...
>>
>>
>I was curious to see if there would be any replies to this. I have just shy
>of 40 RL02 packs, and a few of them had bad scratches rendering them
>useless. Therefore, I attempted to open them in a non-destructive way, just
>to see if it was possible. So far, I haven't had much luck. Also, I noted
>that while all the packs I attempted were DEC (not clones), they did have
>slightly different construction and mechanics, probably based on production
>date.
>
>- Earl
Ha, this made me realize I don't know either. Despite that I now have some RLO3K-DC
packs, and one RLO2 drive.
Dug one out. After a few moments of being stumped, found the trick. Here's how:
On the blue handle, top center, look on the section that has the pivot pins.
There is a flat plastic 'button' on which one end is slightly concave.
With the handle DOWN (flat), put finger on that concave end of the button, and
push sideways, till the button reaches the end of travel.
With it still at end of travel, lift the handle up to vertical. At about 45 degrees
(half way) you'll feel a resistance, then hear a thump.
Once the handle is vertical, lift the pack up by the handle. The lower cover is
separated and the disk is exposed.
But it still is mostly covered, only a slot for the heads is open.
You could lever open the several latches that hold the bottom inner cover on if you wanted.
Guy
Since RS6K systems have been mentioned recently, I thought I should ask
for advice.? I have a Powerserver 320H with 32MB of RAM, an 8-port async
EIA-232 adapter, a SCSI adapter and a 400MB HD.?? No framebuffer or
keyboard; no LAN card.? Because of the last issue, I haven't tried to do
much with it.? I tried getting it to talk on the serial console (Serial
1 connector in the back), following all the advice I found on the net:?
The pinout of the MODU serial connector, the null modem cable with full
handshake (also driving the DCD line in the 320H).? I turn it on in
service mode, and it spits a lot of LED codes, finds the HD, spins it up
and it apparently loads something (I suppose AIX) from it.? But nothing
is? ever sent out on the serial 1 port, or any other serial port.? I
believe that during the POST it fails to initialize the serial 1 and 2
ports, because the 320H's DTR and RTS lines are never asserted (the
ports in the async RS232 card do assert these on power up, but they are
equally silent). I made sure that the CTS, DSR and DCD inputs of the
320H are being driven by the external terminal.
I made a video of the LED codes during POST and found some problems;
here are the codes and their meaning:
120 BIST starting a CRC check on the 8752 EPROM.
122 BIST started a CRC check on the first 32K bytes of the OCS EPROM.
124 BIST started a CRC check on the OCS area of NVRAM.
130 BIST presence test started.
101 BIST started following reset.
153 BIST started ACLST test code.
154 BIST started AST test code.
100 BIST completed successfully; control was passed to IPL ROS.
211 IPL ROM CRC comparison error (irrecoverable). !!!!!!!
214 Power status register failed (irrecoverable).?????????? !!!!!!!
218 RAM POST is looking for good memory.
219 RAM POST bit map is being generated.
290 IOCC POST error (irrecoverable).???????????????????????? !!!!!!!
291 Standard I/O POST running.
252 Attempting a Service mode IPL from 7012 DBA disk-attached
???????? devices specified in IPL ROM Default Device List.
253 Attempting a Service mode IPL from SCSI-attached devices
???????? specified in the IPL ROM Default Device List.
299 IPL ROM passed control to the loaded program code.
814 NVRAM being identified or configured.
538 The configuration manager is going to invoke a configuration
???????? method.
813 Battery for time-of-day, NVRAM, and so on being identified or
???????? configured, or system I/O control logic being identified or
???????? configured.
538 The configuration manager is going to invoke a configuration
???????? method.
520 Bus configuration running.
538 The configuration manager is going to invoke a configuration
???????? method.
869 SCSI adapter being identified or configured.
538 The configuration manager is going to invoke a configuration
???????? method.
954 400MB SCSI disk drive being identified or configured.
538 The configuration manager is going to invoke a configuration
???????? method.
539 The configuration method has terminated, and control has
???????? returned to the configuration manager.
551 IPL varyon is running.
553 IPL phase 1 is complete.
The code 290 above is particularly worrysome, I think.? The NVRAM
battery reads 2.85 volts even after all these years. I reseated all of
the chips that are on bases, all of the cards, and connectors; there was
no change.? Any ideas on how to proceed?
carlos.
Hi all --
I picked up a ZAX ICD-178 in-circuit debugger in the hopes of using it
to help debug / reverse-engineer a couple of 68k-based machines I have.?
This unit can work with 68000, 68010, and 68008-based machines, however
a different emulation CPU module is used for the 68008 vs. the
68000/68010.? Unfortunately, mine came with only the 68008 CPU module.
Since this is a fairly uncommon device, I figure it's unlikely, but just
in case someone's sitting on a pile of parts somewhere, if you have the
68000/68010 Emulation CPU module ("CPU S-813") please drop me a line.
Thanks as always,
Josh
>
> Date: Sun, 2 Dec 2018 16:49:37 -0800
> From: Alan Perry <aperry at snowmoose.com>
> Subject: Re: sun model 47. code 4/40 does it have the nvram with
> battery?
>
> The RDI Britelite (laptop) is a SPARCstation IPX system board in a
> laptop chassis.
>
I have IPC, IPX, and LX versions of the RDI Britelite.
--
Michael Thompson
I'm trying to id this system I just rescued last month.? It is an Eclipse of some type.
Chip date codes are 1976-1977? The front panel is white with blue paddle switches.The rear panel ID plate says? it's a 8461, SN 4802-142-157. it has Options? 4192, 4010, 4042.? it's a 16 slot back plane and was part of a EMI? Cat scan system.
There are 16 boards in this, 9 are DG and the rest my are EMI scanner boards.
Not sure what sales model it is?? ie? C330 or C130 or ???
The front panel is trashed, so what are the differences? between the front panels fromother models.
Are there any manuals for this out there ??
The back plane has 2 damaged chips.? one has a? 74S133 which i understand the other has 20a.?if I read it right.? looks to be a hex inverter of some type ??
Any help would be appreciated
Thanks, Jerry
Ouch, what was I thinking? Mentioning a project I fundamentally can't talk in detail about yet; not very smart.
Thus spawning a thread guaranteed to go chaotic. Sorrrry!
Also I've changed the title, since it's disrespectful to drag a deceased person's name along with this.
I've been busy a couple of days, didn't have time to follow the thread. Still busy, but briefly with extracts:
@ Keelan Lightfoot
> Our problem isn't ASCII or Unicode, our problem is how we use computers.
> Markup languages are a kludge, relying on plain text to describe higher level concepts.
[snip lots]
Nice post, and I agree with all of it. This is the type of thinking needed, and in general much like my approach. Except I'm a software and hardware designer, synthesist, and pursue practical results. Or at least _try_ to.
Funny you mention keyboards, as that's one of the project's bootstrapping steps. First a simulated keyboard (html & js initially) to allow free experimentation, later an open hardware design suitable for makers, 3D printing, etc. The crappyness of commercial keyboards is a bugbear of mine. Keyboards should be MUCH better than they are. And last forever.
@ Grant Taylor & Toby Thain
>> ???? bold
>> ???? italic
>> ???? overline
>> ???? strike through
>> ???? underline
>> ???? superscript exclusive or subscript
>> ???? uppercase exclusive or lowercase
>> ???? opposing case
>> ???? normal (none of the above)
>This covers only a small fraction of the Latin-centric typographic
>palette - much of which has existed for 500 years in print (non-Latin
>much older). Computerisation has only impoverished that palette, and
>this is how it happens: Checklists instead of research.
>Work with typographers when trying to represent typography in a
>computer. The late Hermann Zapf was Knuth's close friend. That's the
>kind of expertise you need on your team.
More generally, an encoding standard needs to allow for ANY kind of present and future characters, fonts and modifiers.
But even more critically, it has to allow for such things without reference to 'central standards groups'. Enforced centralism is poison. For instance Unicode, and that vast table of symbols - that still doesn't include decent arrows (and many other needs.) What's required is a way for any bunch of people to be able to define their own character sets, fonts, adornments, etc, create definition files for them, and use those among themselves. Either embedded in documents or used as referenced defaults - both must be possible. It is easy enough to define a base encoding that allows this. And in which legacy coding (ASCII, Unicode, etc) is one of the available defaults.
The point with embedding such capabilities in the base coding scheme, and then building the superstructure of computing language and OS on top of that, is to achieve a scheme in which human language and typesetting freedom is available through the entire structure.
@ Cameron Kaiser
>> Surely a Chinese or Japanese based programming language could be
>> developed.
>The Tomy Pyuuta has a very limited BASIC variant called G-BASIC which has
>Japanese keywords and is programmed with katakana characters (such as "kake" ...
Exactly, except it should be possible for any group (eg who speak whatever language) to modify existing computer language to their own human dialect. With compilers and assemblers this is not trivial, but with dictionary-based interpreters it's much easier. The keywords and operators are all just looked up in tables to achieve effects, and what characters or ideograms serve as the keywords are entirely flexible.
Then imagine one interpretted scripting language, that serves multiple functions: document layout, user apps and OS scripting. And that scripting language can be phrased in any human language, AND includes full typsetting of itself.
@ Liam Proven
> There are a wider panoply of options to consider.
...
> Try to collapse all these into one and you're doomed.
Lots of great references, thanks! As for doomed... well we'll see. I think the trick is to merely provide a mechanism for including extensible classes of 'stuff' in the base coding. Because being rigid about the mechanics of the higher level capabilities really is fatal. Fortunately, 'flexible extensibility' isn't so hard to do. Especially when you have a bunch of disused legacy control codes to work with.
At 02:34 PM 28/11/2018 -0700, Jim Manley wrote:
>Some computing economics history:
>
>I'm an engineer and scientist by both education and experience,
[snip]
>A theoretically "superior" encoding may
>not see practical use by a significant number of people because of legacy
>inertia that often makes no sense, but is rooted in cultural, sociological,
>emotional, and other factors, including economics.
Yep. I'm intensely aware of the economics and inertia factors. Points:
1. The ASCII-replacement coding is just a part of a wider project.
2. It's all a private project, for fun.
3. And yet there's a convergence of developments suggesting an opportunity in near future.
MS/Intel are bastardizing, backdooring and box-closing the Wintel platform into something so evil even non-technical people are getting sick of it. This will continue, due to political agenda of MS/Intel.
Simultaneously the competing Linux world is fragmenting into churn-chaos. (Complex but irreversible reasons.)
Apple is... Apple. Becoming a platformm based mostly on virtue signalling, and increasingly as bad as Wintel.
4. If it ever is released, it will be freeware, open hardware and copylefted. DRM specifically banned from the platform. With many quite appealing wow-factors, several of which will be totally killer. It is not politically possible for MS/Intel/Apple to follow this path.
[snip]
>Logic and reasoning are
>simply nowhere near enough to create the conditions necessary for
>widespread adoption - sometimes it's just good luck in timing (or, bad
>luck, as the case may be).
Absolutely. It's mostly about politics and meme-crafting. Ref: Marx, L Ron Hubbard,
Mao, various religions, etc. Odd isn't it - so few instances of memetic weavers who
used their skills for the benefit of humankind. As opposed to those guys above, who
were all arseholes with pretty twisted objectives. Did you know L Ron Hubbard created
Scientology to win a drunken bet in a bar? Someone said "I bet you can't create a
religion!" And L Ron said "I bet I can!"
>ASCII was developed in an age when Teletypes ...
Yep.
>You can't blame the ASCII developers for lack of foresight when no one in
>their right mind back then would have ever predicted we could have upwards
>of a trillion bytes of memory in our pockets ...
Absolutely. ASCII was a godsend at the time and I take pains to make this clear in the proposal docs. This is a _hindsight_ refactoring.
>Someone thinking that they're going to make oodles of money from some
>supposedly new-and-improved proprietary encoding "standard" that discards
>five-plus decades of legacy intellectual and economic investment, is
>pursuing a fool's errand.
Ha ha, I don't intend to even try to make any money from this. Other objectives.
Though, I'd probably set up a donations channel. Just in case people like it.
> Even companies with resources at the level of
>Apple, Google, Microsoft, etc., aren't that arrogant, and they've
>demonstrated some pretty heavy-duty chutzpah over time. BTW, you won't be
>able to patent what apparently amounts to a lookup table, and even if you
>copyright it,
Patents and copyright are poisons that are crippling intellectual and technological progress. The original concepts were OK, but got over-extended by greed (and still getting worse.) Patents in particular have become a tool for big corporate suppression of any potential competition, while copyright is used to destroy free expression. The entire DRM/copyright legal framework should be nullified.
This project will be intentionally copyright and patent excluding. Freeware, published, open source, open hardware, etc. Just a conformance symbol, which certifies (among other things) that _nothing_ in the systems & software is under any kind of DRM restriction. People buy or build such a system, they own it entirely.
This is why I can't mention details or coined terminology now.
>True standards are open nowadays - the days of proprietary "standards" are
Except that by 'open' they usually mean you can pay a lot of money for a copy of the standard doc.
That's not what I call 'open.'
>a couple of decades behind us - even Microsoft has been publishing the
>binary structure of their Office document file formats. The specification
>for Word, that includes everything going back to v 1.0, is humongous, and
>even they were having fits trying to maintain the total spec, which is
>reportedly why they went with XML to create the .docx, .xlsx, .pptx, etc.,
>formats. That also happened to make it possible to placate governments
>(not to mention customers) that are looking for any hint of
>anti-competitive behavior, and thus also made it easier for projects such
>as OpenOffice and LibreOffice to flourish.
>
>Typographical bigots, who are more interested in style than content, were
>safely fenced off in the back rooms of publishing houses and printing
>plants until Apple released the hounds on an unsuspecting public. I'm
>actually surprised that the style purists haven't forced Smell-o-Vision
>technology on The Rest of Us to ensure that the musty smell of old books is
>part of every reading "experience" (I can't stand the current common use of
>that word). At least I have the software chops to transform the visual
>trash that passes for "style" these days into something pleasing to _my_
>eyes (see what I did there with "severely-flawed" ASCII? Here's how you
>can do /italics/ and !bold! BTW.).
Oh yes, tell me about it. 'Do it this way' bigots of all kinds. Pick any possible thing that can be done more than one way, and there will be camps of fanatics insisting their one way is the true way and all others are crazy.
Finding such artificial dichotomies (or n-way splits) has been a very rich source of inspiration for holistic rethinking.
Btw, again I'll emphasize that when I say ASCII is severely flawed, I mean this in the context of what we know now about information coding requirements, and creating extensible systems. It was't 'severely flawed' back when it was created.
>Nothing frosts me more than reading text that can't be resized and
>auto-reflowed, especially on mobile devices with extremely limited display
>real estate. I'm fully able-bodied and I'm perturbed by such bad design,
>so, I'm pretty sure that pages that prevent pinch-zooming, and that don't
>allow for direct on-display text resizing/auto-reflow, violate the spirit
>completely, if not virtually all of the letters, of the Americans with
>Disabilities Act (and similar legislation outside the U.S., I imagine).
Well, there's more than that one requirement. If one wanted to capture a historical document, the absolute image of the page(s) is a core aspect, and can't be 'reflowed'. But otoh, the text content should be accessible as a searchable and reflowing character stream. A decent coding scheme will support both objectives simultaneously.
Btw I'm constantly amazed by how badly tech docs are being 'digitized' even now. Service manuals with fold out schematics, screened tonal multi-colour illustrations etc... just endless awful digital copy fails. Meanwhile the original paper copies get rarer and rarer, because idiots think 'those are all online now, paper copies are obsolete', and throw them out.
@ Keelan Lightfoot
>from a usability standpoint, control codes are
problematic. Either the user needs to memorize them, or software needs
to inject them at the appropriate times.
You're thinking of 'control codes' as something you type by holding down CTRL and some other key. Yes, these are a pain and I personally hate UI's that depend on memorising lots of them.
But strictly speaking 'control codes' are the byte codes 0x00 to 0x1F, in the ASCII table. Most of which are now little used apart from in hardware protocols. How those would be brought into use in an ASCII-replacement and new UI, is another topic. Sadly, part of the area I won't talk about. Just bear in mind that this system includes new keyboard designs, and 'things that have to be memorised' are fine for some people but not for others (including me.)
Ha ha, even ctrl-C and ctrl-V for cut and paste are a pain, not because they must be memorised, but because the ergonomics of distorting the fingers to type them, is horrible for such a common action. Stuff like this...
Oh, and if you are wondering if I'm imagining some huge keyboard with even more keys, no. Personally I use a short ('10-keyless') keyboard, and don't want to ever have to go back to stupidly big keyboards.
>In addition to crusty old computers, I also enjoy the company of three
crusty old Linotypes. In fact, that's what got me thinking about this
stuff in the first place.
Ah, I am intensely jealous! I wish I could find an old but working linotype. And someone to teach me how to use it. Hot lead, yeah! (I used to cast things in lead as a child, have done bronze casting and intend to do more.)
I have some exposure to typesetting & printing; enough to know how much I don't know. Some articles on related topics are in-progress, but not yet posted.
Anyway, back on topic (classic computing.) Here's an ascii chart with some control codes highlighted.
http://everist.org/ASCII/ascii_reuse_legend.png
I'm collecting all I can find on past (and present) uses of the control codes. Especially the ones highlighed in orange. Not having a lot of success in finding detailed explanations, beyond very brief summaries in old textbooks.
Note that I'm mostly interested in code interpretations in communications protocols. Their use in local file encodings not so much, since those are the domain of legacy application software and wouldn't clash with redefinition of what the codes do, in future applications.
And now, back to machining a lock pick for a PDP-8/S front panel cylinder lock.
http://everist.org/NobLog/20181104_PDP-8S.htm#locks
Guy
Hi folks,
In my long ongoing quest to image and otherwise copy the hard sectored floppies with my Exidy Sorcerer I?m trying to find other floppy drives I can use with it since I don?t like relying on just one set of drives. I have a Cumana dual drive set that came with my TRS80 Model1 that I thought might be jumperable to 300rpm, indeed I can see drive activity if I try and boot.
Does anyone know where I might find the/a manual for the drives? They?re marked as Intertec 5002040 so I?ve been all over Superbrain docs and PDFs on bitsavers but haven?t found anything so far.
Cheers!
--
adrian/witchy
Owner of Binary Dinosaurs, the UK's biggest private home computer collection?
t: @binarydinosaurs f: facebook.com/binarydinosaurs
w: www.binarydinosaurs.co.uk
Firstly, my goal: to run MazeWar on something other than a NeXT.
I thought this would be fairly straightforward, starting with getting SunOS
4.1.3 booting with QEMU. Turns out, I've not had much luck. I get different
error messages depending on what machine type I'm emulating. I can start
booting from the .iso running this command:
$ qemu-system-sparc -bios ss5.bin -M SS-5 -m 64M -drive
file=sunos413.img,if=scsi,bus=0,unit=3,media=disk -drive
file=SunOS_4.1.3_sparc.iso,format=raw,if=scsi,bus=0,unit=6,media=cdrom,readonly=on
-boot d
and get a near immediate panic:
machine type 0x80 in NVRAM
panic: No known machine types configured in!
Data Access Exception
ok
Okay, how about trying the default BIOS and SS-20? It definitely gets
further, but no dice...
Boot: vmunix
Size: 843776+2315672+64016 bytes
SuperSPARC/SuperCache: PAC ENABLED
SunOS Release 4.1.3 (MUNIX) #3: Mon Jul 27 16:47:33 PDT 1992
Copyright (c) 1983-1992, Sun Microsystems, Inc.
cpu = SUNW,SPARCstation-20
mod0 = TI,TMS390Z55 (mid = 8)
mem = 49020K (0x2fdf000)
avail mem = 44707840
Ethernet address = 52:54:0:12:34:56
espdma0 at SBus slot f 0x400000
esp0 at SBus slot f 0x800000 pri 4 (onboard)
sd2: non-CCS device found at target 2 lun 0 on esp0
sd2 at esp0 target 2 lun 0
sd2: <QEMU 0 blocks>
sd2: Vendor 'QEMU', product 'QEMU', (unknown capacity)
sd3: non-CCS device found at target 0 lun 0 on esp0
sd3 at esp0 target 0 lun 0
sd3: corrupt label - wrong magic number
sd3: Vendor 'QEMU', product 'QEMU', (unknown capacity)
ledma0 at SBus slot f 0x400010
le0 at SBus slot f 0xc00000 pri 6 (onboard)
zs0 at obio 0x100000 pri 12 (onboard)
zs1 at obio 0x0 pri 12 (onboard)
SUNW,fdtwo0 at obio 0x700000 pri 11 (onboard)
BAD TRAP: cpu=0 type=29 rp=f00daba4 addr=0 mmu_fsr=0 rw=0
MMU sfsr=0: No Error
regs at f00daba4:
psr=40400cc7 pc=f00a0968 npc=f00a096c
y: 20000 g1: f00c1e78 g2: 40900ce6 g3: fb005ff0
g4: 2c g5: f00db000 g6: 0 g7: 30000000
o0: 1 o1: 8 o2: f00dac00 o3: f0076e50
o4: 0 o5: 0 sp: f00dabf0 ra: f1000000
(unknown): bad trap = 41
rp=0xf00daba4, pc=0xf00a0968, sp=0xf00dabf0, psr=0x40400cc7, context=0x0
g1-g7: f00c1e78, 40900ce6, fb005ff0, 2c, f00db000, 0, 30000000
Begin traceback... sp = f00dabf0
Called from f00c1eb8, fp=f00dac58, args=ff009000 f00dacbc 0 f0314a70 1000
1000
Called from f00a7d34, fp=f00dacc0, args=ff009000 0 ff009000 fb002098
f0314a70 ff009000
Called from f00a7708, fp=f00dad20, args=1080000 d f0102d50 f0102db3 0 2
Called from f00a74e0, fp=f00dad80, args=f0305bd4 f0102d50 fb001000 fb001050
0 0
Called from f00a5028, fp=f00dade0, args=f00fc000 fefe0014 0 0 f0102d50
f0305bd4
Called from f00ac084, fp=f00dae40, args=72 1000 1 1 86 800000
Called from f0015f7c, fp=f00daef8, args=800000 100000 fb000000 2fdd 2000 2
Called from f000539c, fp=f00daf58, args=f00dafb4 f00076c0 10801522 821020ff
200 f00ce600
Called from 403f0c, fp=0, args=4000 3ffd60 1 235598 4000 0
End traceback...
panic: trap
rebooting...
Then I thought, why not use The Machine Emulator to emulate a Sun 3 and
play with something even older? I can't get that to build using clang under
OS X 10.9. I've changed a few lines of source already to get it further
along in the compilation process, but now I'm stuck:
In file included from module.c:48:0:
module.c: In function 'tme_module_init':
module.c:93:3: error: 'lt_preloaded_symbols' undeclared (first use in this
function); did you mean 'lt_dlloader_remove'?
LTDL_SET_PRELOADED_SYMBOLS();
^
Okay, now I'm tired of trying to emulate it (actually, I still would like
to play with QEMU or TME...), so I pulled a SS-20 off the shelf and threw a
SCSI2SD card in it. I didn't have a means of burning a CD, so I used the
SCSI2SD to also emulate a CDROM drive at device 6, and unplugged the
existing CDROM drive. I can boot off of it just fine, and I get now even
further along the process of installation, and am able to format the hard
drive. Right when I think things are going well, I get this:
esp0: Target 6.0 reverting to async. mode
sr0: SCSI transport failed: reason 'data_ovr': giving up
m partition number 3
fastread: can't read label on /dev/rsr0:I/O error
ERROR while loading miniroot disk: /dev/rsd0b
#
Any ideas?
Thanks,
Kyle
I'm not sure how many of you who are on this list are on the vcfed.org
forum, but just for those who aren't, with the help of Dave and Monty from
there, I have recently restored a 4051 I bought a couple years ago to
working condition. Last night with their guidance I connected it to a
Tektronix development system called the Board Bucket, also a 6800 driven
machine that Tek engineers/employees could buy from Tek (I think in parts)
that I purchased previously.
With the 4051 in terminal mode, we were able to demonstrate that the BASIC
in ROM in the Board Bucket can drive graphics on the Tek terminal. This was
pretty much clear after I dumped the ROMs and Dave had a close look at them,
but it was still very cool to see the two working together nonetheless. I
feel very privileged to have both one of the products of Tek's computer
development efforts and the development machine used to help create it
(and/or others) in my possession.
Anyway for those interested, I posted a 4 min video here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SSkHRzx5Bno
Brad
At 09:49 PM 26/11/2018 -0700, Grant wrote:
>On 11/26/18 7:21 AM, Guy Dunphy wrote:
>> Oh yes, tell me about the html 'there is no such thing
>> as hard formatting and you can't have any even when
>> you want it' concept. Thank you Tim Berners Lee.
>
>I've not delved too deeply into the lack of hard formatting in HTML.
It was a core of the underlying philosophy, that html would NOT allow
any kind of fixed formatting. The reasoning was that it could be displayed
on any kind of system, so had to be free-format and quite abstract.
Which is great, until you actually want to represent a real printed page,
or book. Like Postscript can. Thus html was doomed to be inadequate for
capture of printed works. That was a disaster. There wasn't any real reason
it could not be both. Just an academic's insistense on enforcing his ideology.
Then of course, over time html has morphed to include SOME forms of absolute
layout, because there was a real demand for that. But the result is a hodge-podge.
>
>I've also always considered HTML to be what you want displayed, with
>minimal information about how you want it displayed. IMHO CSS helps
>significantly with the latter part.
Yes, it should be capable of that. But not enforce 'only that way'.
By 'html' I mean the kludge of html-css-js. The three-cat herd. (Ignoring all the _other_ web cats.)
Now it's way too late to fix it properly with patches.
>> Except that 'non-breaking space' is mostly about inhibiting line wrap at
>> that word gap.
>
>I wouldn't have thought "mostly" or "inhibiting line wrap". I view the
>non-breaking space as a way to glue two parts of text together and treat
>them as one unit, particularly for display and partially for selection.
>Granted, much of the breaking is done when the text can not continue (in
>it's natural direction), frequently needing to start anew on the next line.
And that's why in html that character is written " "
You just rephrased my 1.2 lines as 5 lines.
>> But anyway, there's little point trying to psychoanalyze the writers of
>> that software. Probably involved pointy-headed bosses.
>
>I like to understand why things have been done the way they were.
>Hopefully I can learn from the reasons.
We already established that they thought it a good idea to insert fancy 'no-break'
coding if the user typed two spaces. They thought they were adding a useful feature.
I meant there's no point trying to determine why they were so deluded, and failed to
recognise that maybe some users (Ed) would want to just type two spaces.
>
>> Of course not. It was for American English only. This is one of the
>> major points of failure in the history of information processing.
>
>Looking backwards, (I think) I can understand why you say that. But
>based on my (possibly limited) understanding of the time, I think that
>ASCII was one of the primordial building blocks that was necessary.
YES! I'm not arguing ASCII was _bad_. It was a great advance. There was
no way they could have included the experience of 50 more years if comp-sci.
And now 'we' (the world) are stuck with it for legacy compatibility reasons.
Any extensions have to be retro-compatible.
[snip]
>> Containing extended Unicode character sets via UTF-8, doesn't make it a
>> non-hard-formatted medium. In ASCII a space is a space, and multi-spaces
>> DON'T collapse. White space collapse is a feature of html, and whether
>> an email is html or not is determined by the sending utility.
>
>Having read the rest of your email and now replying, I feel that we may
>be talking about two different things. One being ASCII's standard
>definition of how to represent different letters / glyphs in a
>consistent binary pattern.
That's what you are talking about.
> The other being how information is stored in an (un)structured sequence
> of ASCII characters.
What I'm talking about is not that. It's about how to create a coding scheme
that serves ALL the needs we are now aware of. (Just one of which is for old
ASCII files to still make sense.) This involves both re-definition of some
of the ASCII control codes, AND defining sequential structure standards.
For eg UTF-8 is a sequential structure. So are all the html and css codings,
all programming languages, etc. There's a continuum of encoding...structure...syntax.
The ASCII standard didn't really consider that continuum.
[snip] ACK - ACK.
>> ----------
[snip]
>> Human development of computing science (including information coding
>> schemes) has been effectively a 'first time effort', since we kept on
>> developing new stuff built on top of earlier work. We almost never went
>> back to the roots and rebuilt everything, applying insights gained from
>> the many mistakes made.
>
>With few notable (partial) exceptions, I largely agree.
Which exceptions would those be? (That weren't built on top of ASCII!)
[big snip]
>> This is a scan from the 'Recommended USA Standard Code for Information
>> Interchange (USASCII) X3.4 - 1967' The Hex A-F on rows 10-15, added
>> here. Hexadecimal notation was not commonly in use in the 1960s. Fig. ___
>> The original ASCII definition table.
>>
>> ASCII's limitations were so severe that even the text (ie ASCII) program
>> code source files used by programmers to develop literally everything
>> else in computing science, had major shortcomings and inconveniences.
>
>I don't think I'm willing to accept that at face value.
I assume you're thinking that ASCII serves just fine for program source code?
This is a bandwagon/normalcy bias effect. "Everyone does it that way and always has,
so it must be good."
Sigh. Well, I can't go into that without revealing more than I wish to atm.
>> A few specific examples of ASCII's flaws:
>>
>> ?? Missing concept of control vs data channel separation. And so we
>> needed the "< >" syntax of html, etc.
>
>I don't buy that, at all.
>
>ASCII has control codes to that I think could be (but isn't) used for
>some of this. Start of Text (STX) & End of Text (ETX), or Shift Out
>(SO) & Shift In (SI), or Device Control 1 - 4 (DC1 - DC4), or File /
>Group / Record / Unit Separators (FS / GS / RS / US) all come to mind.
You're making my point for me. Of course there are many ways to interpret
existing codes to achieve this effect. Some use control codes, others
overload functionality on printable characters. eg html with < and >.
My point is the base coding scheme doesn't allocate a SPECIFIC mechanism
for doing this. The result is a briar-patch of competing ad-hoc methods.
Hence the 'babel' I'm referring to, in every matter where ASCII didn't
define needed functionality.
>Either you're going to need two parallel byte streams, one for data and
>another for control (I'm ignoring timing between them), -or- you're
>going to need a way to indicate the need to switch between byte
>(sub)streams in the overall byte (super)streams. Much of what I've seen
>is the latter.
By definition, in a single baseband data stream it's ALWAYS the case that
time-interleaving is the only way to achieve command/data separation.
>It just happens that different languages have decided to use different
>(sequences of) characters / bytes to do this. HTML (possibly all XML)
>use "<" and ">". ASP uses "<%" and "%>". PHP uses "<?(php)" and ">?".
>Apache HTTPD SSI uses "<!--#" and "-->". I can't readily think of
>others, but I know there are a plethora. These are all signals to
>indicate the switch between data and control stream.
Exactly. Because ASCII does not provide a specific coding. It didn't
occur to those drtafting the standard. Same as with all the other...
>
>> ?? Inability to embed meta-data about the text in standard programatically
>> accessible form.
>
>I'll agree that there's no distinction of data, meta, or otherwise, in a
>string of ASCII bytes. But I don't expect there to be.
And so every different devel project that needed it, added some kludge on top.
This is what I'm saying: ASCII has no facility for this, but we need a basic
coding scheme that does (and is still ASCII-compatible.)
>Is there any distinction in the Roman alphabet (or any other alphabet in
>this thread) to differentiate the sequence of bytes that makes up the
>quote verses the metadata that is the name of the person that said the
>quote? Or what about the date that it was originally said?
Doesn't matter. The English alphabet (or any other human language) naturally
do not have protocols to concisely represent data types. That's no reason to
not build such things into the character coding scheme used in computational
machinery. In a way we can read.
Like, for instance written decimal numbers, sci-notation, units, etc.
The written form is much more compact than the spoken forms.
>This is about the time that I really started to feel that you were
>talking about a file format (for lack of a better description) than how
>the bytes were actually encoded, ASCII or EBCDIC or otherwise.
The project consists of several parts. One is to define an extension of ASCII
(with a different name, that I'm not going to mention for fear of pre-emptive
copyright bullshit.) Other parts relate to other areas in comp-sci, in the same
manner of 'see what happens if one starts from scratch.'
It's a fun hobby project. That text I quoted is a small part of one chapter of the docs.
Atm the whole thing is undergoing _another_ major refactoring, due to seeing a better way
to do some parts of it.
>> ?? Absense of anything related to text adornments, ie italics, underline
>> and bold. The most basic essentials of expressive text, completely
>> ignored.
>
>Again, alphabets don't have italics or underline or bold or other. They
>have to depend on people reading them, and inferring the metadata, and
>using tonal inflection to convey that metadata.
And yet written texts do have adornments (which can be of different forms
in different languages.) So, you're saying a text encoding scheme should not have
any way to represent such things? Why not?
The ASCII printable character set does not have adornments, BECAUSE it is purely a
representation of the alphabet and other symbols. That's one of its failings, since
all 'extras' have to be implemented by ad-hoc improvisations.
>> ?? Absense of any provision for creative typography. No awareness of
>> fonts, type sizes, kerning, etc.
>
>I don't believe that's anywhere close to ASCII's responsibility.
I'm pretty sure you've missed the whole point. The ASCII definition 'avoided responsibility'
thus making itself inadequate. Html, postscript, and other typographic conventions layer
that stuff on top, messily and often in proprietary ways.
>
>> ?? Lack of logical 'new line', 'new paragraph' and 'new page' codes.
>
>I personally have issues with the concept of what a line is, or when to
>start a new one. (Aside: I'm a HUGE fan of format=flowed text.)
Then you never tried to represent a series of printed pages in html.
Can be sort-of done but is a pain.
ASCII doesn't understand 'lines' either. It understands physical head printers.
Hence 'carriage return' and 'line feed'. Resulting in the CR/CR-LF/LF wars for
text files where a 'new line' was needed.
Even in format-flowed text there is a typographic need for 'new line'.
It means 'no matter where the current line ends, drop down one line and start
at the left.'
Like I'm typing here.
A paragraph otoh is like that, but with extra vertical space separating from above.
Because ASCII does not have these _absolutely_fundamental_ codes, is why html
has to have <br> and <p>. Not to get into the whole </p> argument.
Note that including facility for real newline and paragraph symbols in the basic
coding scheme, doesn't _force_ the text to be hard formatted. That's a display mode
option.
>
>We do have conventions for indicating a new paragraph, specifically two
>new lines.
Sigh. Like two spaces in succession being interpretted to do something special?
You know in type layout there are typically special things that happen for
paragraphs but not for newlines? You don't see any problem with overloading
a pair of codes of one type, to mean something else?
>Is there an opportunity to streamline that? Probably.
Factors to consider:
- Ergonomics of typing. It _should_ be possible to directly type reasonably typographically
formatted text, with minimal keystrokes. One can type html, but it's far from optimal.
There are many other conventions. None arising from ASCII, because it lacks _everything_ necessary.
- Efficiency of the file/stream encoding. Allowing for infinitely extensible character sets,
embedded specifications of glyph appearances (fonts), layout, and dynamic elements.
- Efficiaency and complexity of code to deal with constructing, processing and displaying texts.
>
>I also have unresolved issues of what a page is. (Think reactive web
>pages that gracefully adjust themselves as you dynamically resize the
>window.)
Sure. Now you think of trying to construct a digital representation of a
printed work with historical significance. So it NUST NOT dynamically reformat.
Otoh it might be a total simulation of a physical object/book, page turn physics and all.
[snip]
>> ?? Inadequate support of basic formatting elements such as tabular
>> columns, text blocks, etc.
>
>ASCII has a very well defined tab character. Both for horizontal and
>vertical. (Though I can't remember ever seeing vertical tab being used.)
Ha ha... consider how does the Tab function work in typewriters? What does
pressing a Tab key actually do?
ASCII has a Tab code, yes. It does NOT have other things required for actual use
of tabular columns. So, the Tab functionality is completely broken in ASCII.
That was actually a really bad error on their part. They didn't need foresight,
they just goofed. Typewriters had working Tabs function since 1897.
>I think there is some use for File / Group / Record / Unit Separators
>(FS / GS / RS / US) for some of these uses, particularly for columns and
>text blocks.
Not the same thing.
>> ?? Even the extremely fundamental and essential concept of 'tab
>> columns' is impropperly implemented in ASCII, hence almost completely
>> dysfunctional.
>
>Why do you say it's improperly implemented?
Specifically, ASCII does not provide any explicit means to set and clear an array of
tabular positions (whether absolute or proportional.)
Hence html has to implement tables, grid systems, etc. But it SHOULD be possible to
type columnar text (with tabs) exactly and as ergonomically as one would on a typwriter.
>It sounds as if you are commenting about what programs do when
>confronting a tab, not the actual binary pattern that represents the tab
>character.
Why would I be talking of the binary code of the tab character?
>What would you like to see done differently?
Sigh. You'll have to wait.
>> ?? No concept of general extensible-typed functional blocks within text,
>> with the necessary opening and closing delimiters.
>
>Now I think you're asking too much of a character encoding scheme.
ASCII is not solely a 'character encoding scheme', since it also has the control codes.
But those implement far less functionality than we need.
>I do think that you can ask that of file formats.
Now tell me why you think the fundamental coding standard, should not be the same as
used in file formats. You're used to those being different things (since ASCII is missing so much),
but it doesn't have to be so.
>> ?? Missing symmetry of quote characters. (A consequence of the absense
>> of typed functional blocks.)
>
>I think that ASCII accurately represents what the general American
>populous was taught in elementary school. Specifically that there is
>functionally a single quote and a double quote. Sure, there are opening
>and closing quotes, both single and double, but that is effectively
>styling and doesn't change the semantic meaning of the text.
There you go again, assuming 'styling' has no place in the base coding scheme.
>> ?? No provision for code commenting. Hence the gaggle of comment
>> delimiting styles in every coding language since. (Another consequence
>> of the absense of typed functional blocks.)
>
>How is that the responsibility of the standard used to encode characters
>in a binary pattern?
You keep assuming that a basic coding scheme should contain nothing but the
common printable characters. Despite ASCII already containing more than that.
Also tell me why there should not be a printable character specifically meaning
"Start of comment" (and variants, line or block comments, terminators, etc.)
You are just used to doing it a traditional way, and not wondering if there
might be better ways.
>That REALLY sounds like it's the responsibility of the thing that uses
>the underlying standard characters.
You think that, because all your life you've been typing /* comment */ or whatever.
In truth, the ASCII committee just forgot.
>> ?? No awareness of programatic operations such as Inclusion, Variable
>> substitution, Macros, Indirection, Introspection, Linking, Selection, etc.
>
>I see zero way that is the binary encoding format's responsibility.
Oh well.
>I see every way that is the responsibility of the higher layer that is
>using the underlying binary encoding.
>
>> ?? No facility for embedding of multi-byte character and binary code
>> sequences.
>
>I can see how ASCII doesn't (can't?) encode multi-byte characters. Some
>can argue that ASCII can't even encode a full 8 bit byte character.
a) ASCII is 7 bits.
b) UTF-8
This is getting a bit pointless.
>But from the standpoint of storing / sending / retrieving (multiples of
>8-bit) bytes, how is this ASCII's problem?
>
>IMHO this really jumps the shark (as if we hadn't already) from an
>encoding scheme to a file format.
>
>> ?? Missing an informational equivalent to the pure 'zero' symbol of
>> number systems. A specific "There is no information here" symbol. (The
>> NUL symbol has other meanings.) This lack has very profound implications.
>
>You're going to need to work to convince me of that.
You're going to need to wait a few years, till you see the end product.
That bit of text I quoted is a very, very brief points list. Detailed discussion
of all this stuff is elsewhere, and I _can't_ post it now, since that would
seriously damage the project's practical potential. (Economic reasons.)
>Mathematics has zero, 0, for a really long time. (Yes, there was a time
>before we had 0.) But there is no numerical difference between 0 and 00
>and 0000. So, why do we need the latter two?
Column multiplier significance. That's a different thing from the nature of '0'
as a symbol. At present there is no symbol meaning 'this is not information.'
Nevermind, it's difficult to grasp without a discussion of the implications for
very large mass storage device structure. And I'm not going there now.
>> ?? No facility to embed multiple data object types within text streams.
>
>How is this ASCII's problem?
It wasn't then, but the lack of it is our problem now.
>How do you represent other data object types if you aren't using ASCII?
>Sure, there's raw binary, but that just means that you're using your own
>encoding scheme which is even less of a common / well known standard
>than ASCII.
UTF-8 is multi-byte binary, of a specific type. Just ONE type. No extensibility.
>We have all sorts of ways to encode other data objects in ASCII and then
>include it in streams of bytes.
??? Are you deliberately being obtuse? The point is to attempt to formulate
a new standard that allows all this, in one well defined, extensible way that
permits all future potential cases. We do know how to do this now.
>Again, encoding verses file format.
>
>> ?? No facility to correlate coded text elements to associated visual
>> typographical elements within digital images, AV files, and other
>> representational constructs. This has crippled efforts to digitize the
>> cultural heritage of humankind.
>
>Now I think you're lamenting the lack of computer friendly bytes
>representing the text that is in the picture of a sign. Functionally
>what the ALT attribute of HTML's <IMG> tag is.
No. People who do scan captures of documents will understand that. They face the
choice: keep the document as page images (can't text search), or OCR'd text
(losing the page's visual soul.) But it should be possible to do BOTH, in
one file structure - if there was a defined way to link elements in the symbolic
text to words and characters in the images.
You'll say 'this is file format territory.' True at the moment, but only because
the basic coding scheme lacks any such capability.
>IMHO this is so far beyond a standard meant to make sure that people
>represent A the same way on multiple computers.
You realise ASCII doesn't do that?
>> ?? Non-configurable geometry of text flow, when representing the text
>> in 2D planes. (Or 3D space for that matter.)
>
>What is a page ^W 2D plane? ;-)
Something got lost there. "^W' ??
Surely you understand that point. English: left to right, secondary flow: downwards.
Many other cultural variants exist.
>I don't think oral text has the geometry of text flow or a page either.
>Again, IMHO, not ASCII's fault, or even it's wheelhouse.
Huh? This is pretty random.
It's a common response syndrome when someone discusses deviating from the common paradigm.
If I'm being silly enough to try discussing this in fragmentary form, I expect a lot of it.
>> ?? Many of the 32 'control codes' (characters 0x00 to 0x1F) were allocated
>> to hardware-specific uses that have since become obsolete and fallen
>> into disuse. Leaving those codes as a wasted resource.
>
>Fair point.
>
>I sometimes lament that they control codes aren't used more.
>
>> ?? ASCII defined only a 7-bit (128 codes) space, rather than the full
>> 8-bit (256 codes) space available with byte sized architectures. This
>> left the 'upper' 128 code page open to multiple chaotic, conflicting
>> usage interpretations. For example the IBM PC code page symbol sets
>> (multiple languages and graphics symbols, in pre-Unicode days) and the
>> UTF-8 character bit-size extensions.
>
>I wonder what character sets looked like for other computers with
>different word lengths. How many more, or fewer, characters were encoded?
There are many old codings.
>Did it really make a difference?
Not after ASCII became a standard - unless you were using a language that needed more
or different characters. ie most of the world's population.
>Would it make any real difference if words were 32-bits long?
Hah. In fact, the ability to represent unlimited-length numeric objects,
is one of the essentials of an adequate coding scheme. ASCII doesn't.
The whole 'x-bits long words' is one of the hangups of computing architectures too.
But that's another story.
>What if we moved to dictionary words represented by encoding schemes
>instead of individual characters?
You're describing Chinese language programming. Though you didn't realise.
And yes... :) A capable encoding scheme, and computing architecture built
on it, would allow such a thing.
>Or maybe we should move to encoding concepts instead of words. That way
>we might have some loose translation of the words for mother / father /
>son / daughter between languages. Maybe. I'm sure there would still be
>issues. Gender and tense not withstanding.
Point? Not practical.
The coding scheme has to be compatible with the existing cultural schemes
and existing literature. (All of them.)
[snip]
>> ?? Inability to create files which encapsulate the entirety of the visual
>> appearance of the physical object or text which the file represents,
>> without dependence on any external information. Even plain ASCII text
>> files depend on the external definition of the character glyphs that the
>> character codes represent. This can be a problem if files are intended
>> to serve as long term historical records, potentially for geological
>> timescales. This problem became much worse with the advent of the vast
>> Unicode glyph set, and typset formats such as PDF.
>
>Now even more than ever, it sounds like you're talking about a file
>format and not ASCII as a scheme meant to consistently encode characters.
Hmmm... well this is what happens when I post a short snippet from a larger text.
Short because I have to carefully read anything I cut-n-past post to be sure I didn't
include stuff I don't want to expose yet. Anyway, here's a bit more, that may
make things clearer.
----------------
Starting Over
What began as my general interest in the evolution of information encoding schemes, gained focus as more and more instances of early mistakes became apparent. Eventually it spawned a deliberate project to evaluate 'starting over.' What would be the result of trying?
Like this:
* Revisit the development history of computing science, identifying points at which, in hindsight, major conceptual shortcomings became cemented into foundations upon which today's practices rest.
* Evaluate how those conceptual pitfalls could have been avoided, given understandings arrived at later in computing science.
* Integrate all those improvements holistically, creating a virtual 'alternate timeline' of computing evolution, as if Computing Science had evolved with prescience of future conceptual advances and practical needs. Aiming to arrive at an information processing and computing architecture, that is what we'd already have now if we knew what we were doing from the start.
The resulting computing environment's major components are the ****** coding scheme, the ***** operating system and hardware platform, the ***** scripting language, and the ***** file system.
----------------
>> The PDF 'archival' format (in which all referenced fonts must be defined
>> in the file) is a step in the right direction ??? except that format
>> standard is still proprietary and not available for free.
>
>Don't get me started on PDF. IMHO PDF is where information goes to die.
Hey, we totally agree on something! I *HATE* PDF, and the Adobe DRM-flyblown horse it rode in on.
When I scan tech documents, for lack of anything more acceptable I structure the
page images in html and wrap as a RAR-book.
Unfortunately few know of this method.
>Once data is in a PDF, the only reliable way to get the data back out to
>be consumed by something else is through something like human eyes.
>(Sure it may be possible to deconstruct the PDF, but it's fraught with
>so many problems.)
There *was* at one point a freeware utility for deconstructing PDF files and analysing their structure.
I forget the name just now. It apparently was Borged by the forces of evil, and no longer can be found.
Anyone have a copy?
Photoshop is able to extract original images from PDFs, but it's a nightmare process.
>> ----------
>>
>> Sorry to be a tease.
>
>Teas is not how I'd describe it. I feel like it was more of a bait
>(talking about shortcomings with ASCII's) and switch (talking about
>shortcomings with file formats).
No, they are not intrinsically different things. It just seems that way from the viewpoint of convention
because ASCII lacks so many structural features that file (and stream) formats have to implement on their own.
(And so everyone does them differently.)
>That being said, I do think you made some extremely salient points about
>file formats.
Ha, wait till (eventually - if ever) you see the real thing.
I'm having lots of fun with it. Result is like 'alien tech.'
>> Soon I'd like to have a discussion about the functional evolution of
>> the various ASCII control codes, and how they are used (or disused) now.
>> But am a bit too busy atm to give it adequate attention.
>
>I think that would be an interesting discussion.
Soon. Few weeks. Got to get some stuff out of the way first. I have way too many projects.
Guy
> On a whim, I tried searching for '"pdp-11" "pdp-11"' (i.e. just
> repeated the keyword), and this time it _did_ turn it up! Very odd.
> I wonder why that made a difference?
So I have a new theory about this. Searching for 'pdp-11' causes eBay to
automagically limit the search to the 'Vintage Computing' category. They
must have a keyword->category database.
Anyway, if I manually then select 'All' categories, I get the same results
for searches for both 'pdp-11' and 'pdp-11 pdp-11'. So my theory is that
'pdp-11 pdp-11' _doesn't_ hit their database, and so it goes to 'All' -
thereby producing different results.
So I just have to hit 'All' every time I do a search...
Noel
For some actual content about classic computers (instead of flaming about
various ideas for improving existing systems), I think I've worked out
why the BA11-C and BA11-E mounting boxes have out of sequence variant codes.
It's obvious the variants were not assigned in creation order (the /44 and /24
use the -A variant box), but the -C and -E (the earliest variants, it seems)
apparently come from the fact that the first is used to hold the CPU and
console (for the /20), and the latter is an Expansion box.
And speaking of the -C/-E, somewhat to my surprise, I've discovered that their
H720 Power Supply is actually a switching supply. Ironically, its manual gives
a _far_ better explanation of the EI conversion concept than the later H742
one (which we discussed here at some length, after it confused me no end).
Speak of BA11 variants, I've seen mention a BA11-B on Web sites, but only a
single ref in a DEC manual (the DH11 Maint Man); does anyone have a pointer
to a location where it's dicussed at more length? If so, thanks!
Noel
Card Edge Connectors are PC Board to Wire Connectors. The 34-pin version was popular for control board on 5-1/4? floppy drives in 1980s.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edge_connector
I have not seen commercial PC board widgets used as an interconnect.
gb
==
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2018 14:56:18 -0500
From: "William Sudbrink" <wh.sudbrink at verizon.net>
To: cctalk
Subject: 34 pin card edge male to male biscuit (wafer? adapter?)
Hi,
Before I go to the bother of making up a gerber, and putting in a cheap Chinese PCB order, does anyone know of any place that has them for sale?
Hello,
I have added a Unibus CH11 Chaosnet interface to SIMH. I have tested it
with 4.1BSD running on the vax780 simulator, and MINITS running on the
pdp11 simulator.
Hi Bob,
On 11/28/2018 11:30 AM, Robert Feldman wrote:
> FYI, your symbols do not make it through to the list digest -- they just
> come through as question marks, the same as Ed Sharp's extra spaces.
Thank you for letting me know.
Here's a screen shot from the copy I received from the mailing list:
Link - grant-symbols
- https://dotfiles.tnetconsulting.net/images/grant-symbols.png
I know that they did come through the normal non-digest messages from
the mailing list.
Would you mind forwarding me a copy (directly) of the raw digest? I'm
curious what happened to them and I don't currently subscribe to the
digested feed. Depending on what I see, I may bring the issue up on the
Mailman mailing list.
--
Grant. . . .
unix || die
When I bought that Sparcstation 4/330 at Computer Parts Barn, the 48T02
was one of the problems with it. The chip looks like a piggieback rom
encapsulated in epoxy.
I was not reinventing the wheel at the time, I think, because it was
the year 2000 or so, but I looked for a replacement and found them hard
to come by. So, knowing the battery was most likely the fault, I went
about fixing that bit.
The battery accounts for the high profile. You do not have to cut the
entire doggone batter off, the terminals are at one side, iirc, the
right-hand side if the notch is to your left. It is high on the epoxy,
so all you need do is cut down an eighth of an inch in that region,
just shave that top edge until you expose the battery terminals. I
forget how I determined the polarity of them, perhaps I plugged it into
the board after and tested the terminals for power, but all you do once
you've exposed the terminals is solder a power and a ground wire to
them and attach a 3volt battery. I used a pack with two AA's, in a
case so they are user-replaceable. They are probably STILL keeping
time in that machine, wherever DHS took it and my MEGA ST4 and DG
MV4000/dc... That's another story.
So refurbishing these chips is a cakewalk, takes 15 minutes (the second
time 'round), and will work til' doomsday.
Best regards,
Jeff
I thought cctalk was supposed to be a complete superset of cctech, but
looking at the cctech archives, I see a lot of posts that didn't make it
to cctalk. Does one need to do both to see everything?
Noel
Hello group:
Has anyone used a FixMeStick to fix computer issues like virus problems and key tracking hacking? Does it really fix such problems or create new ones?
Thanx for any comments that are posted.
Ed
Hi,
Before I go to the bother of making up a gerber, and
putting in a cheap Chinese PCB order, does anyone
know of any place that has them for sale?
I bought a stack of them for about a buck a piece, a
number of years ago, but I can't seem to find them
for sale anymore.
They are very useful when you want to preserve the
original cables on machines where the CPU and drive
chassis are "permanently" joined but you want the
ease of being able to separate them. Ohio Scientific
machines are a good example of this.
They are also useful to provide test points in the CPU
to drive signals.
Over the years, I've lost a few and given a few away
and now I need some more.
Thanks,
Bill S.
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
At 10:52 PM 25/11/2018 -0700, you wrote:
>> Then adds a plain ASCII space 0x20 just to be sure.
>
>I don't think it's adding a plain ASCII space 0x20 just to be sure.
>Looking at the source of the message, I see =C2=A0, which is the UTF-8
>representation followed by the space. My MUA that understands UTF-8
>shows that "=C2=A0 " translates to " ". Further, "=C2=A0 =C2=A0"
>translates to " ".
I was speaking poetically. Perhaps "the mail software he uses was
written by morons" is clearer.
>Some of the reading that I did indicates that many things, HTML
>included, use white space compaction (by default), which means that
>multiple white space characters are reduced to a single white space
>character.
Oh yes, tell me about the html 'there is no such thing as hard formatting
and you can't have any even when you want it' concept. Thank you Tim Berners Lee.
http://everist.org/NobLog/20130904_Retarded_ideas_in_comp_sci.htmhttp://everist.org/NobLog/20140427_p-term_is_retarded.htm
> So, when Ed wants multiple white spaces, his MUA has to do
>something to state that two consecutive spaces can't be compacted.
>Hence the non-breaking space.
Except that 'non-breaking space' is mostly about inhibiting line wrap at
that word gap. But anyway, there's little point trying to psychoanalyze
the writers of that software. Probably involved pointy-headed bosses.
>As stated in another reply, I don't think ASCII was ever trying to be
>the Babel fish. (Thank you Douglas Adams.)
Of course not. It was for American English only. This is one of the major
points of failure in the history of information processing.
>> Takeaway: Ed, one space is enough. I don't know how you got the idea
>> people might miss seeing a single space, and so you need to type two or
>> more.
>
>I wondered if it wasn't a typo or keyboard sensitivity issue. I
>remember I had to really slow down the double click speed for my grandpa
>(R.I.P.) so that he could use the mouse. Maybe some users actuate keys
>slowly enough that the computer thinks that it's repeated keys. ??\_(???)_/??
Well now he's flaunting it in his latest posts. Never mind. :)
>> And since plain ASCII is hard-formatted, extra spaces are NOT ignored
>> and make for wider spacing between words.
>
>It seems as if you made an assumption. Just because the underlying
>character set is ASCII (per RFC 821 & 822, et al) does not mean that the
>data that they are carrying is also ASCII. As is evident by the
>Content-Type: header stating the character set of UTF-8.
Containing extended Unicode character sets via UTF-8, doesn't make it a
non-hard-formatted medium. In ASCII a space is a space, and multi-spaces
DON'T collapse. White space collapse is a feature of html, and whether an
email is html or not is determined by the sending utility.
>Especially when textual white space compression does exactly that,
>ignore extra white spaces.
>
>> Which looks very odd, even if your mail utility didn't try to
>> do something 'special' with your unusual user input.
As you see, this IS NOT HTML, since those extra spaces and your diagram below would
have collapsed if it was html. Also saving it as text and opening in a plain text ed
or hex editor absolutely reveals what it is.
>I frequently use multiple spaces with ASCII diagrams.
>
>+------+
>| This |
>| is |
>| a |
>| box |
>+------+
>> Btw, I changed the subject line, because this is a wider topic. I've been
>> meaning to start a conversation about the original evolution of ASCII,
>> and various extensions. Related to a side project of mine.
>
>I'm curious to know more about your side project.
Hmm... the problem is it's intended to be serious, but is still far from exposure-ready.
So if I talk about it now, I risk having specific terms I've coined in the doco (including
the project name) getting meme-jammed or trademarked by others. The plan is to release it
all in one go, eventually. Definitely will be years before that happens, if ever.
However, here's a cut-n-paste (in plain text) of a section of the Introduction (html with diags.)
----------
Almost always, a first attempt at some unfamiliar, complex task produces a less than optimal result. Only with the knowledge gained from actually doing a new thing, can one look back and see the mistakes made. It usually takes at least one more cycle of doing it over from scratch to produce something that is optimal for the needs of the situation. Sometimes, especially where deep and subtle conceptual innovations are involved, it takes many iterations.
Human development of computing science (including information coding schemes) has been effectively a 'first time effort', since we kept on developing new stuff built on top of earlier work. We almost never went back to the roots and rebuilt everything, applying insights gained from the many mistakes made.
In reviewing the evolution of information coding schemes since very early stages such as the Morse code, telegraph signal recording, typewriters, etc, through early computing systems, mass data storage and file systems, computer languages from Assembler through Compilers and Interpreters, and so on, several points can be identified at which early (inadequate) concepts became embedded then used as foundations for further developments. This made the original concepts seem like fundamentals, difficult to question (because they are underlying principles for much more complex later work), and virtually impossible to alter (due to the vast amounts of code dependent on them.)
And yet, when viewed in hindsight many of the early concepts are seriously flawed. They effectively hobbled all later work dependent on them.
Examples of these pivotal conceptual errors:
Defects in the ASCII code table. This was a great improvement at the time, but fails to implement several utterly essential concepts. The lack of these concepts in the character coding scheme underlying virtually all information processing since the 1960s, was unfortunate. Just one (of many) bad consequences has been the proliferation of 'patch-up' text coding schemes such as proprietry document formats (MS Word for eg), postscript, pdf, html (and its even more nutty academia-gone-mad variants like XML), UTF-8, unicode and so on.
[pic]
This is a scan from the 'Recommended USA Standard Code for Information Interchange (USASCII) X3.4 - 1967'
The Hex A-F on rows 10-15, added here. Hexadecimal notation was not commonly in use in the 1960s.
Fig. ___ The original ASCII definition table.
ASCII's limitations were so severe that even the text (ie ASCII) program code source files used by programmers to develop literally everything else in computing science, had major shortcomings and inconveniences.
A few specific examples of ASCII's flaws:
Missing concept of control vs data channel separation. And so we needed the "< >" syntax of html, etc.
Inability to embed meta-data about the text in standard programatically accessible form.
Absense of anything related to text adornments, ie italics, underline and bold. The most basic essentials of expressive text, completely ignored.
Absense of any provision for creative typography. No awareness of fonts, type sizes, kerning, etc.
Lack of logical 'new line', 'new paragraph' and 'new page' codes.
Inadequate support of basic formatting elements such as tabular columns, text blocks, etc.
Even the extremely fundamental and essential concept of 'tab columns' is impropperly implemented in ASCII, hence almost completely dysfunctional.
No concept of general extensible-typed functional blocks within text, with the necessary opening and closing delimiters.
Missing symmetry of quote characters. (A consequence of the absense of typed functional blocks.)
No provision for code commenting. Hence the gaggle of comment delimiting styles in every coding language since. (Another consequence of the absense of typed functional blocks.)
No awareness of programatic operations such as Inclusion, Variable substitution, Macros, Indirection, Introspection, Linking, Selection, etc.
No facility for embedding of multi-byte character and binary code sequences.
Missing an informational equivalent to the pure 'zero' symbol of number systems. A specific "There is no information here" symbol. (The NUL symbol has other meanings.) This lack has very profound implications.
No facility to embed multiple data object types within text streams.
No facility to correlate coded text elements to associated visual typographical elements within digital images, AV files, and other representational constructs. This has crippled efforts to digitize the cultural heritage of humankind.
Non-configurable geometry of text flow, when representing the text in 2D planes. (Or 3D space for that matter.)
Many of the 32 'control codes' (characters 0x00 to 0x1F) were allocated to hardware-specific uses that have since become obsolete and fallen into disuse. Leaving those codes as a wasted resource.
ASCII defined only a 7-bit (128 codes) space, rather than the full 8-bit (256 codes) space available with byte sized architectures. This left the 'upper' 128 code page open to multiple chaotic, conflicting usage interpretations. For example the IBM PC code page symbol sets (multiple languages and graphics symbols, in pre-Unicode days) and the UTF-8 character bit-size extensions.
Inability to create files which encapsulate the entirety of the visual appearance of the physical object or text which the file represents, without dependence on any external information. Even plain ASCII text files depend on the external definition of the character glyphs that the character codes represent. This can be a problem if files are intended to serve as long term historical records, potentially for geological timescales. This problem became much worse with the advent of the vast Unicode glyph set, and typset formats such as PDF. The PDF 'archival' format (in which all referenced fonts must be defined in the file) is a step in the right direction ? except that format standard is still proprietary and not available for free.
----------
Sorry to be a tease.
Soon I'd like to have a discussion about the functional evolution of
the various ASCII control codes, and how they are used (or disused) now.
But am a bit too busy atm to give it adequate attention.
Guy
Now that my mousepad problem has been solved, and I have a fully working Ardent Titan with some interesting software on it ? the bundled version of MATLAB, and BIOGRAF, a molecular modeling application ? I decided to make a short video about this system in which I show the hardware and demonstrate some of the software: https://youtu.be/tMSnnt3iFz0
For those who haven?t heard of the system; the 1987 Ardent Titan (later renamed the Stardent 1500) was the first system that combined vector processors (as in a Cray-like architecture) and a graphics engine on the same backplane, and was the highest-performing graphics supercomputer for a short while. In the end, however, a longer than planned time to market and a forced merger with Stellar Computer caused the premature demise of the company.
Cleve Moler, the inventor of MATLAB, worked at Ardent for three years, which is one of the reasons the Titan was the only computer ever to come with MATLAB as part of its bundled software. As I found out later ? after creating this video ? the version of MATLAB on the Titan was unique, because it included a ?render? command, which would plot a 3D surface using the Dor? graphics library. On other platforms, MATLAB could only render mesh plots. It wasn?t until 1992 that the mainstream version of MATLAB gained 3D surface rendering.
Cleve wrote a number of articles on his blog about the Titan, one of which (https://blogs.mathworks.com/cleve/2013/12/09/the-ardent-titan-part-2/) describes how the Titan was used to create a video of a vibrating L-shaped membrane. With a little help from Cleve, I?m trying to recreate this video. A first effort ? which isn?t quite right yet ? can be seen here: https://youtu.be/-XeabDqRAG8
I hope some of you enjoy these!
Camiel
It's been quite a hiatus, but I'm finally back with more!
Radio Shack TRS-80 Color Computer
Advantech I.Q. Unlimited Computer
Heath ZKB-2 keyboard
EMP MM-102 Manual Mini Modem
Lexicon LEX-12 Direct/Acoustically Coupled Modem
Univsersal Data Systems 103 LP Modem (boxed)
Univsersal Data Systems 103 LP Modem
Morrow Designs Micro Decision
HP 9111A Graphics Tablet
SyQuest SQ3270S Cartirdge Disk Drive
IBM Type 3363 Optical WORM Drive
Macintosh SE FDHD
Macintosh PowerBook Duo 2300c
Apple M1242 Adjustable Keyboard
Electomechanical keyboard
Pertec Computer Corp. Univac Keypunch Keyboard
HP Thermal Printer Paper pack
HP 9816
HP 110 Portable w/9114A, 2225B and original HP carry case
Anderson Jacobsen AJ 1233 Acoustically Coupled Modem
Ven-Tel MD212 Plus Modem
Mass Micro Systems Dual 45MB SCSI Removable Hard Drive
Novation Cat acoustically coupled modem
DEC DF02 Modem
IBM 5140 PC Convertible
Iomega The Bernoulli Box II PC2/50 Adapter Kit
Zenith SuperSport Lap Top Computer
Zenith SuperSport 286 Portable Computer
Compaq Armada 1500 series laptop prototype
Compaq LTE 5000 series laptop prototype
The New Arrivals Niche is your guide to the goodies:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets...72371&range=A1
<https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1I53wxarLHlNmlPVf_HJ5oMKuab4zrApI_hi…>
Please contact me directly by e-mail if you want to inquire about something:
sellam.ismail at gmail.com
I apologize for my absence, I got tied up with life issues. To those who
are waiting on me to send them something, I did not forget about you and
will be sending you an update via e-mail. If I owe you something and you
have not heard from me then by all means please contact me ASAP so I may
rectify that.
Thanks!
Sellam
Just in case anyone isn't aware, and who gets duplicate characters input because they have some un-steadiness, and are using a Windows/10 PC (I think 7 as well) there are some options in
in the "Ease of Access" settings "Filter Keys" settings => "bounce keys" that may help with your typing. These set a configurable delay that will ignore repeated keypresses for a very short period of time.
The default is 0.5 of second but its configurable. You need to enable "Filter Keys" to see the "Bounce Keys" option. There is also a "slow keys" option.
I hope this helps, and I am sorry if you knew this already and it doesn't ....
Dave
G4UGM
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cctalk <cctalk-bounces at classiccmp.org> On Behalf Of ED SHARPE via
> cctalk
> Sent: 26 November 2018 18:30
> To: lproven at gmail.com; cctalk at classiccmp.org
> Subject: Re: George Keremedjiev
>
> i use email i use and suggest you use a delete key. no loss no gain...
>
>
> In a message dated 11/26/2018 11:16:07 AM US Mountain Standard Time,
> lproven at gmail.com writes:
>
>
> On Mon, 26 Nov 2018 at 17:54, ED SHARPE < couryhouse at aol.com> wrote:
> >
> > pay attention it us,probaby my hand which adds,Xtra spaces as stated
> > before, please feel free to use the delete key
>
> Are you saying that you have motor control problems, such as Parkinson's
> Disease or something? If so, I am really sorry -- but you have never said that
> before, to my recollection.
>
> But you have never commented to anyone who has asked why you don't
> switch to a proper local email client, which would fix the quoting and so on.
> Do you not have access to your own computer, or something? If so I am sure
> someone could give you a machine, if that would help...
>
> --
> Liam Proven - Profile: https://about.me/liamproven
> Email: lproven at cix.co.uk - Google Mail/Hangouts/Plus: lproven at gmail.com
> Twitter/Facebook/Flickr: lproven - Skype/LinkedIn: liamproven
> UK: +44 7939-087884 - ?R (+ WhatsApp/Telegram/Signal): +420 702 829 053
i use email i? use and suggest? ?you? ?use a delete key.? no? loss no? gain...
In a message dated 11/26/2018 11:16:07 AM US Mountain Standard Time, lproven at gmail.com writes:
?
On Mon, 26 Nov 2018 at 17:54, ED SHARPE <
couryhouse at aol.com> wrote:
>
> pay attention it us,probaby my hand which adds,Xtra spaces as stated before,
> please feel free to use the delete key
Are you saying that you have motor control problems, such as
Parkinson's Disease or something? If so, I am really sorry -- but you
have never said that before, to my recollection.
But you have never commented to anyone who has asked why you don't
switch to a proper local email client, which would fix the quoting and
so on. Do you not have access to your own computer, or something? If
so I am sure someone could give you a machine, if that would help...
--
Liam Proven - Profile: https://about.me/liamproven
Email: lproven at cix.co.uk - Google Mail/Hangouts/Plus: lproven at gmail.com
Twitter/Facebook/Flickr: lproven - Skype/LinkedIn: liamproven
UK: +44 7939-087884 - ?R (+ WhatsApp/Telegram/Signal): +420 702 829 053
Folks,
I have a VAXStation 4000/VLC which I would like to try to use as a
workstation. I have a keyboard and mouse, but can't find any connector for
the video port in the UK, and the only thing I can find in the USA is this:-
https://www.ebay.com/itm/232664832774
which comes in at around $100 by the time I and import charges, VAT etc and
its rather more than I wanted to pay.
Dave Wade
G4UGM & EA7KAE
<p.s. Another keyboard would be useful, the one I have is from a VT
terminal. Would also like a TK70 to fill the hole in the VAX/4000 300.>
> From: Camiel Vanderhoeven
> I have a fully working Ardent Titan with some interesting software on
> it - the bundled version of MATLAB, and BIOGRAF, a molecular modeling
> application
Neat! Excellent! Do you have the source for any/all of the software on it?
Noel
"drrt1968 at gmail.com" posted on AFC this morning that Bill died in the Camp fire in Northern California on Thursday.
Has anyone else heard about this?
Hello,
this is what I found:
These ROMS can
be read on an EPROM programmer as an MC68766 part,
as long as the programer strobes CS or OE when reading
each consecutive address. Most will do that.
They can be directly replaced with pin-compatible EPROM
MC68766 or MCM68766C35 but these are obsolete though
easily available as surplus parts for about 10 dollars
each. The SCM90448C might also be a direct replacement.
Modern EPROM 27HC641 aka M27HC641 can be used and is pin
compatible, as long as you cook the data before burning,
because A10 and A12 (if I remember correctly) are swapped.
Hope this helps.
Andrea
Folks,
While sorting through my pile of 3270 terminals I came across a little
plastic box with 2 x 9-pin rs232, 1x25pin printer port and one VGA port. On
taking the lid off it seems it's a terminal for NYCE made by TCL but I can
find no info on the net.
I put a few pics of it here:-
https://1drv.ms/f/s!Ag4BJfE5B3onkY8FlfveCwr73J5HIw
I can't seem to get into ant set-up menus, and I am sure it used to show
these, Does any one have any documents on these?
Searching on google is hampered by the fact there is a TCL language.
Dave Wade
G4UGM & EA7KAE
I recently picked up a Rainbow 100. The PVA between the safety glass and the CRT on VR201 that came with it has broken down and failed badly.
I have seen videos and read about removing the safety glass, cleaning out the PVA, and reattaching and resealing the safety glass.
All that I have seen basically sticks the safety glass on at its edges and leaves a void where the PVA had been. It seems to me that the PVA was providing some implosion protection. Would it work to replace the PVA and attach the safety glass to the tube with an optically clear adhesive sheet? I have seen that this exists, but have never used it before.
Also, I have never worked on a CRT before. I am trying to find a local person who can observe me and stop me from doing something stupid. If I can?t find someone, what am I more likely to do wrong? How can I be sure I discharged it before touching it?
Finally, a VR201 specific question. I booted the Rainbow over the weekend and, looking through broken-down PVA, I could see the Rainbow has booted and I could enter DOS commands. I could also see white retrace lines. What is the likely cause of that on a 35-year-old CRT?
alan
I had a Sparcstation 4/330 with optical mouse, without the pad. Of
course I wanted one, and eventually found one, but in the interim, I
did what an old hack suggested and printed myself a grid on paper.
Works peachy. The spacing of the grid will determine the tracking
speed of the mouse. Graph paper works if you get a fine grid. Try
.5cm.
Just to get you on the road til' your pad gets to you. My old hack
told me they had a problem with the pads disappearing and had a file on
their network for folks to just print themselves one for the day.
Jeff
Guys,
I'm about to finish another project:
"UniBone" - a Linux-to-UNIBUS bridge, based on the BeagleBone Black.
It is supposed to be a development platform for device emulation.
At the moment it can emulate memory, emulate an RL11 controller with 4
RL drives attached, and act as UNIBUS hardware test adapter.
There are some web pages at http://retrocmp.com/projects/unibone
And I'll show it on VCFE.CH in Zurich on Nov 24/25,? plugged into a
PDP-11/05.
Enjoy,
Joerg
I have some ROMs from two DEC Pro 350s I want to image. My programmer fails
to identify them automatically. From the technical manual it would seem that
they are two 8K ROMS in a DIP24 package. I have tried to pick some other
model of ROM and read them, but I am not convinced I am reading them
correctly as a result (top 4K all 1s).
Here are the markings. On one pair the ROMs are Motorola and one of them is
marked
LM8450
254E4
SCM
90448C
ID8402
On the other pair one of them is marked:
/B8250
MM51264KXL/N
23-115E4-00
TP-03
And the other is marked:
Mostek 8252
MK36C25N-5
23-116E4-00
TP01
I know that in all cases the last line is just an ID for the actual contents
and the last two have a DEC part number in the penultimate line.
I have found that using Motorola MCM68766 seems to read the ROMs from one of
the machines and I don't get verification errors when I try to read them
back again a few times, although the contents don't seem to have any
recognisable strings. Using Motorola MCM2716 gave me fewer bytes (of
course), but there seemed to be recognisable strings too.
The other pair of ROM chips from the second machine always give verification
errors. I don't know if they are bad, or if it is just timing problems given
that I am not using the right parameters for the ROM chip in the first
place.
Can anyone point me at a datasheet that might describe these ROMs, or at
least what they might be equivalent to so I can set my programmer
accordingly?
Regards
Rob
Hello everyone,
A week ago, I took possession of a second Ardent Titan graphics supercomputer, and unlike the other Titan, this one is almost complete. There is one tiny bit missing, and that is a mouse pad. The mouse used with this systems is a Mouse Systems M4 variant (M4Q), and it does not appear to be a normal serial mouse. So, if anyone has one of those reflective mousepads with a grid of fine blue and grey lines that they don?t need, I?d be very happy to have it.
I have tried to print my own mousepad, but the mouse only works in the y direction on it.
For those who want to know, the Titan is outfitted as follows:
2 x Titan P3 vector processors (using a MIPS R3000 for scalar operations)
2 x 64 MB main memory
Extended G2 Graphics
3 Maxtor 760 MB disks
QIC-120 tapedrive
19? trinitron monitor with stereo bezel and 3d glasses
Keyboard, mouse, knob box
Titan OS 4.2 installed (plus version 3.0, 4.1, and 4.2 installation tapes)
Dore, AVS, and PHIGS+ graphics environments
Vectorizing FORTRAN compiler with LINPACK, EISPACK, and FFT libraries
Matlab-Pro 3.5 (the Titan was the only computer ever that had Matlab as part of its bundled programs)
Biodesign Biograf 3.0 molecular modeling application
All bits and pieces, and all software appears to work.
Camiel
At 07:49 PM 11/24/2018, Bill Degnan via cctalk wrote:
>I suggested a shallow box does not have to be so tall.
>
>On Sat, Nov 24, 2018, 7:56 PM Steve Malikoff via cctalk <
>cctalk at classiccmp.org wrote:
>
>>
>> > I wonder if anyone made a 3d printer file for a 33 chad box?
>> > Dwight
>>
>> ...working on it :)
I believe John Toebes was talking about 3D printing a chad box
on the Greenkeys list a month or so ago.
- John
I've finished my work on designing and debugging a PCB to go with my
AVR-based bluebox program. Read about it and
buy one at https://661.org/proj/bluebox/.
This project implements a bluebox in C on AVR microcontrollers. This
project is roughly a reimplementation of Don Froulas's PIC-based bluebox,
which was written in PIC assembly. The resulting compiled program is
intended to be loaded into one of the following circuit boards.
Currently the code implements a bluebox, silver box (DTMF dialer with 4th
column), redbox, greenbox, and 2600hz pulse dialer. There are 12 memory
locations of 41 keystrokes each.
--
David Griffith
dave at 661.org
A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
Resend, just in case that screen-cap image attachment fails. It is also here:
http://everist.org/6F2a/cctalk_rcvd.png
>Will require
>some way to compare mailboxes in search of pattern in missing
>emails... Which may or may not be obvious... which will lead to more
>puzzles... oy maybe I should have stayed muted and let others do the
>job...
Here's one check. See attached screen-cap of cctalk emails. Usually many per
day, but only one per day on the 15th & 16th Nov, none at all on the 17th.
Did the list actually go silent then? It's possible by random ebb and flow,
or maybe everyone was in shock over the awful Paradise fire death toll.
Which may be over 1000, unless a lot of people listed as missing do turn up.
Guy
>Message: 10
>Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2018 16:17:27 -0500
>From: ED SHARPE <couryhouse at aol.com>
>To: jfoust at threedee.com, cctalk at classiccmp.org, cctalk at classiccmp.org
>Subject: Re: George Keremedjiev
>Message-ID: <16738228ce4-1ebf-222a at webjas-vad240.srv.aolmail.net>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
>
>who? knows?? ?what? mail program? are? you using that? ?does that?
>
>
>In a message dated 11/21/2018 1:25:08 PM US Mountain Standard Time, cctalk at classiccmp.org writes:
>
>?
>At 02:03 PM 11/21/2018, ED SHARPE via cctalk wrote:
>
>>I? sold? him my? extra classic 8? with the plexi covers on it... sn 200? series....? we? kept? sn #18
>
>Side question: What process is turning non-blanking spaces into ISO-8859-1
>circumflex-A for you?
>
>I see '?' all throughout your emails.
>
>- John
I get CCTalk in digest form and see the "?" in Ed's posts. Almost all (but strangely not all) of his posts are like that. I might occasionally see a strange extra character in someone else's post, but only rarely and then they usually are some non-English diacritical mark.
BTW, we went through this about 6 months ago. Someone pointed out the strange characters in Ed's posts. No change resulted from that, however, and I doubt this thread will cause any change.
Bob
I'm trying to use the Compaq/HP Extended Math Library? (CXML) on a DEC
Alpha under AXP Openvms 8.4 - Hobbyist License.
Fortran 8.2 and CXML were part of the Hobbyist distribution I downloaded.
CXML complains that FORRTL is not present or the version is too low, (it
is not present - $Product show product - )
What am I missing?
Doug
I've been helping the MAME guys simulate a TS-2624, which is a block mode HP emulating terminal.
I had bought this a while ago, and never dumped the firmware. Unfortunately there is a large
NiCd battery right in the middle of the board that leaked all over. I've taken some pictures
which are up under falco on bitsavers.
If anyone has one of these, you want to do battery mitigation ASAP. I'm in the middle of replacing
every socket on the board since they were all within range of the leakage corrosion.
Also, I suspect the first generation of terminals all have similar hardware with different
firmware, so if someone has any of the other models (TS-1, etc.) we could get them simulated
pretty easily once the firmware is dumped.
Hello. Encountered a couple odd parts in the pile today, not sure if they
are anything special. Hp branded dip packages with gold leads. They appear
to be leds in 4 grid patterns on the face. Im curious what they are out of,
most likely an old hp computer or calculator.
Part number on the back is hp5033592-101
i could not find any information online about them. If they are of use to
someone with a hp conputer let me know. If not im trying to find a
datasheet and use them in a project.
Pictures :
https://i.postimg.cc/dtJTGZfm/2018-11-21-10-48-34.jpghttps://i.postimg.cc/pL6hNGLq/2018-11-21-10-49-19.jpghttps://i.postimg.cc/C1Nw054S/2018-11-21-10-50-37.jpg
Hi Guys,
I have the following manuals looking for a home, free except for postage/delivery. (Based in UK).
1.
11/44 Field Maintenance Print Set (includes memory inverter, MS11-M, TU58)
2.
RWP04 moving head disk subsystem maintenance manual
3.
RM05 Disk Subsystem User guide + RM05 Fault Isolation Guide + RM05 IPB + RM05 Disk Subsystem Service Manual
4.
DEC Station 220 Installation and Operations Guide
5.
RA80 Maintenance Guide + RA81 Disk Drive Maintenance Guide + RA60 Maintenance Guide
6.
MDM Microvax Diagnostic Monitor User's guide + Wartips (Warrington Support) - SID Registers, Boot lists, DCL Bits 7 Bobs.
Will happily give further details if required, otherwise these go into recycling
Regards Mike Norris
I have completed a scan of the December 1972 issue of "Communications
News" and posted it to archive.org:
https://archive.org/details/CommunicationsNewsV9N12/page/n0
Lots of great info and (mostly tiny) pics in here for fans of
terminals, modems, early online networks and the growing data
communications and computer telephony industries. And a big color ad
for a Silent700 ASR!
Google Books holds a lot of the other industry journals (the "______
World" types) but as far as I can tell, there are no other issues of
this publication online.
-j
Vintage geeks,
Third attempt - hope springs eternal!
Do any of you know where I could get hold of IBM 2321 "Data Cell" media?
1960s-1970s.
See:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IBM_2321_Data_Cell
If you do, I would like to get hold of one.
Many thanks,
Peter
PS Apologies if I am boring you.
|| | | | | | | | |
Peter Van Peborgh
62 St Mary's Rise
Writhlington Radstock
Somerset BA3 3PD
UK
01761 439 234
|| | | | | | | | |
>
> Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2018 10:41:36 -0800
> From: Alan Perry <aperry at snowmoose.com>
> Subject: Removing PVA from a CRT
>
> I recently picked up a Rainbow 100. The PVA between the safety glass and
> the CRT on VR201 that came with it has broken down and failed badly.
>
> I have seen videos and read about removing the safety glass, cleaning out
> the PVA, and reattaching and resealing the safety glass.
>
> All that I have seen basically sticks the safety glass on at its edges and
> leaves a void where the PVA had been. It seems to me that the PVA was
> providing some implosion protection. Would it work to replace the PVA and
> attach the safety glass to the tube with an optically clear adhesive sheet?
> I have seen that this exists, but have never used it before.
>
> alan
>
When we fixed the VR14 at the RICM, we were concerned about the safety
aspects of removing the PVA and just using double-sided tape to hold the
outer glass in place. We bought a thin sheet of Lexan at Home Depot, put
the outer glass on a cookie sheet with the outside surface down, put the
sheet of Lexan on top, and put it in an oven. When the temperature hit 420F
(if I remember correctly) the Lexan softened and conformed to the inside of
the glass. We trimmed the Lexan to size, reassembled the Lexan and glass to
the front of the CRT, and glued the steel mounting band in place. It looks
great, and is probably a lot safer than just leaving the PVA out.
--
Michael Thompson
I'm trying to throw a party, but like any good host I'm worried about
the food and entertainment and if anybody will show up. We already
know there is no food at the museum so I need really, really good
entertainment ... Right now we have seven exhibitors who have
formally registered. We really need a total of 20 to 25 to make this
work. We are still a few months away so I'm not in full scale panic
mode yet, but I can feel it coming. ;-0
If you are interested in joining the party again, please register. An
overview of what it means to be an exhibitor and the link to the
registration form can be found here:
http://vcfed.org/wp/vcf-pnw-exhibitor-registration/ .
If you participated last year and don't want to do it again, I can
understand that. To keep things interesting I'm trying to minimize
the number of repeat exhibits. However, you can still help in a few
ways:
- Know somebody who should join the party? Talk to them about
exhibiting at 2019. A little nudging and mentoring from a friend can
make it easier to bring new people in.
- Have an interesting topic you want to talk about? We're looking for
speakers too ...
- Can you volunteer a few hours? Many hands makes light work, and
also gets you into the museum for the weekend for free.
Have any leads on people I should talk to or ideas for making the show
better? Send them along ... I'd be happy to discuss.
One final note: Contrary to any previously sent communication, we are
not "selling" spots ... I'm actively trying to get rid of the
exhibitor fee entirely, and will guarantee that it will be no more
than $20 this year if it is charged at all.
Thanks,
Mike
VCF PNW President, CEO, and Executive Floppy Disk Shuffler
I have a question. I use the USB port for serial. In my program, I use a fixed com port. When going to the control panel, I find that I see (in use) tags on some of the com ports. I'm the only one currently using the com ports but recently another (in use) showed up, requiring me to modify my program to use another com port. How does one unuse a com port? how do I find out what is using it so I can stop it? I'm using windows 7 professional. Has anyone else had this problem?
Dwight
I?ve come into an HP-Apollo 9000/425t which uses memory boards with 72-pin headers rather than using SIMMs.
Based on what I can see in pictures online, the boards themselves don?t appear to be anything special (they just carry TMS444000 etc. DRAM) and the connections aren?t anything special either, so I figure it shouldn?t be hard to design a SIMM adapter.
Does anyone have or know where I could find the pinout and timings?
-- Chris
I'm wondering if anyone knows where to find a copy of some software to
make an IBM 3270 Emulation Adapter (the short ISA one) useful. I hear
that IBM's PCOMM/3270 2.0 - 4.0 or so will work (on DOS) with the
card.
Pat
I'm trying to use a simulated RX02 disk (under simh) with RT-11
and can't seem to get the DY driver to install.
Here's the relevant log:
sim> set ry enabled
sim> att ry0 ry0.dsk
RY: creating new file
RY: buffering file in memory
sim> c
.install dy
?KMON-F-Invalid device installation DL0:DY.SYS
.dir dy.sys
DY .SYS 4P 20-Dec-85
1 Files, 4 Blocks
14841 Free blocks
I've tried with 2 different software "kits", the one from the simh site
and the one from bitsavers.
Any ideas?
Thanks, Don
I'm interested in looking at any published drafts prior to the C 1989
standard. I found X3J11-88-090 here:
https://yurichev.com/ref/Draft%20ANSI%20C%20Standard%20(ANSI%20X3J11-88-090…
That makes mention of the previous draft being X3J11-88-001. Does anyone
still have a copy of that draft, or other pre-89 drafts?
I'm not looking for any of the published standards (I've purchased them),
nor any drafts after the 1989 standard.
Eric
> From: Paul Koning
>> The DEC font uses a zero with a slash
> For that, a capital O with a slash would probably serve.
Actually, it turns out that only earlier panels (e.g. KA10, TC08, etc) use the
slashed zero; later ones (KI10, RP11, etc) use the ordinary ones. Since our
panel is intended for use with the RPV11-D, the unslashed is OK.
Thanks to all for all the help with the font; did anyone have any comments
on the _layout_ of the inlay (here:
http://www.classiccmp.org/pipermail/cctalk/2018-November/043285.html
for those who missed it among all the other messages).
Noel
I have a dual density 88780B. Is it possible to upgrade to quad density by
acquiring/swapping boards?
Or does someone have an 800bpi 9-track on SCSI Incan borrow or buy?
I have a pair of 1984 pdp11/70 UNIX SysV (R0, R1?) tapes that need to be
archived.
Regards,
Kevin
Hello.
I have a VAX730 with both TU58 drives destroyed (capstan melted, need
replacements).
I also have a bunch of cassettes, but unfortunately all seem to have
problems with the bend and/or bad spots on the tape.
Possibly I would try to replace the broken bands (if I find a source)
and/or replace the magnetic tape when damaged (I was thinking to try
with audio cassette tape, don' t know if metal oxide high density tape
could be good for it).
Anybody has some information about the coercivity of original DEC TU58 tape?
One problem indeed is the need of reformatting the tape, but: if I can
emulate the TU58 drive using a serial, would it be possible to send
raw commands to the drive using the serial and a PC?
Andrea
PS-If possible, some good-condition cassette would be very useful to
me too. I'm located in Italy.
The VCF museum took delivery of a VAX 9440 today.
It arrived in two 28-foot trailers. Here's our forklift driver beginning
to unload the first truck:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1E-Q5xrsYXyjrZEZh92xIBhlStvvNUcRV/view?usp=…
Here's a teaser picture of the main cabinet:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1bEpSMzBEeOvuDnzPQ9Npc7iYmDhjZq8c/view?usp=…
The full system is 30-40 feet long when it's all set up! It is in
pristine condition and was in service at a defense contractor until a
couple of months ago.
Rumor has it that we arranged for another one to land in Dave McGuire's
Large Scale Systems Museum collection, and a third to be with Bob
Roswell's System Source collection. :) Perhaps they'll post updates too!
Fred Cisin wrote:
> Opened to public at 10:00 AM, by which time, the vendors had been buying
> each others stuff for quite a while. "It's worth getting a vendor table,
> just for the early admission!"
That's true for just about any hamfest/swap meet, isn't it? Buy stuff right
out
of the back of the truck as it is unloaded.
Bill S.
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
So, anyone happen to know the font used in DEC's indicator panels:
http://ana-3.lcs.mit.edu/~jnc/tech/DECIndicatorPanels.html
or, at least, a very close match?
For mockups we're doing, Dave B is using 'DejaVu Sans', but that's not a
really close match: the vertical bars are wider than in the DEC font, where
the verticals and horizontals are the same width.
It would be nice to have a closer match when we go to turn out replicas.
(We're just about settled on the format for the QSIC RKV11-F/RPV11-D panels.)
Noel
A BILL GODBOUT TALE? C-? Ed Sharpe? Archivist? for SMECC
BEWARE THIS NARTIVE WANDERS>?
A very old friend Bill Godbout of the s100 computer days and my first real commercial buyer of any large quantity of surplus electronics material from me when I went into the early part of my computer store and surplus electronics business was burned in the fire in Paradise I have been informed. Very sad - He was a great guy - I met him at a computer fair in as I remember San Jose California ? I believe it was at the fairgrounds ? (Fair was run by a pleasant guy (was his name Craig or? Can someone clarify?) with the neatest 59 El Camino Chevy Truck (Prior to this I had never seen a ?59 before (I would love one!) Steve Beleauh (sp?) in High School had a ?64 ) were I had taken mainly a bunch of odds and ends but also some 8 inch floppy disc power supplies that Intel had scrapped at Empire metals ( Gary and Ray no doubt had something to do with those ending up there ? Hi guys!) and a box of AC power cords and some parts and stuff now what would be considered scrap too....Bill Godbout had set up to sell. (of course, he had all kids of computer stuff his company produced and other things he was a vendor for... He was a big guy in the BIZ in those days, We of course had some power cords and Bill and I when talking got on the topic of power cords for computers ... the new style...like all out pcs use now. ( the prior version on one end the normal 3 prog plug in the wall plug and the other had oval ends and round pins... and were available all over but not so the "NEW" style ( like we use now) I ended up with many many palate loads ITT Courier Terminal Company in Tempe Arizona ( They made IBM clone cluster terminal system -? but unlike? the? IBM? terminals? had? non-clicking? keyboards)) was surplussing ... and had calculated the quantity and cost carefully and beat the Finkelstein Brothers -> Mhz Electronics and Semiconductor Surplus... Richard at MHz still alive Steve at Semi Passed away)... ALAS!! The brothers miscalculated or used that as a reason for not getting the lot in later conversations, but It set us up with more damn cords that I ever imagined I could even sell.
?
ANYWAY... First deal I did with him.... Telling Bill Godbout of all these cords he says ... well... "TRUST ME" ... "ship them to me and on receipt I will send you a check!" and then he jokes about I shouldn?t trust anyone in this business saying TRUST ME! But I did and true to his word his check arrived which set me up with enough cash to make many other great buys of Minicomputers, parts and terminals as I started out. Actually I think that is were the money came from to buy my first PDP-8 from Richard at MHz Electronics he had laying about. It was a 8M or 8F like an 8E with omnibus but short case so only accepting one Buss backplane and it used LEDS in the front panel vs the light bulbs the 8E used. (I was later able to sell this for a large sum thus? increasing the ?Computer Exchange? working capital.
Thanks Bill. You will always be in our book as one of the original good guys.... and thanks for being someone I could trust in dealings. God in Heaven... Take good care of old Bill for me...
Today I picked up a Rainbow 100. The seller bought it new for a specific
need and he says that it had been sitting in his barn since '84. It
looks like it was a dry barn because things look pretty clean for the
most part aside from a thick layer of dust on everything.
What I got was the system unit, a VR201 monitor, a keyboard, a vertical
deskside stand for the system unit, and a LQP02 daisy wheel printer. I
also got the MS-DOS and CP/M doc and software slip cover boxes. The CP/M
disk box is still sealed and the CP/M docs are still in shrink wrap. The
specific need that the seller bought it for involved MS-DOS, not CP/M.
I last saw a Rainbow 100 in college around the time that the seller
stopped using this system, so I am getting familiar with it now. I
haven't powered anything on yet.
Problems so far -
1. The VR201 monitor is leaking a brown fluid. Doing a little searching,
I found some stuff posted here a couple years ago about it being common
for them to leak PVA compound, so I am presuming what is what I am
seeing. Right now I am looking for something that describes how to open
the case up to clean the stuff up. If someone can give me some pointers
to some docs/write-ups and save me some time, that would be great.
2. The belt that moves the print head is dried out and looks like, if
the motor put any load on the belt, it will fail. Is any kind of
replacement available?
Thanks for any help that can be provided.
alan
I saw a brief positive post on Facebook, but nothing else.
Any chance someone could write it up?
Also, were there any announcements re. licensing etc?
Steve
---
Stephen Merrony
I hadn't started this DEC Alpha 3000-300 since last summer, and booted
it up so I could load the new PAK's the other day.
The result was that it completes almost the entire OpenVMS startup, but
then crashes with the following:
%SET-I-INTSET, login interactive limit = 64, current interactive value = 0
**** OpenVMS Alpha Operating System V8.4???? - BUGCHECK ****
** Bugcheck code = 000001CC: INVEXCEPTN, Exception while above ASTDEL
** Crash CPU: 00000000??? Primary CPU: 00000000??? Node Name: A300
** Highest CPU number:??? 00000000
** Active CPUs:?????????? 00000000.00000001
** Current Process:?????? DECW$STARTUP
** Current PSB ID:??????? 00000001
** Image Name: A300$DKA0:[SYS0.SYSCOMMON.][SYSEXE]DECW$CONFIG.EXE;1
**** Starting selective memory dump at? 8-NOV-2018 21:57...
The disk is a SCSI2SD board with an 8 GB SD card.? It had been running
just fine, until now.
Does this crash point to a hardware or software problem?