I'm not one that ever advocates tearing apart classic gear. But in this case
I think it's warranted and I'd like some advice.
I have more than a few RA81's that are all clearly labled "BAD HDA", and the
person I got them from confirmed "these are all dead". I grabbed them
anyways as they had to be taken as part of "the deal".
I am not familiar with these drives at all. From what I've heard over the
years, they have a fairly high failure rate and thus people who use them are
often looking for HDA assemblies. This makes me think that it's unlikely
that I'll be able to just pull the bad HDA's out and obtain good ones to put
in. Plus I don't need this many drives at all, so I think it's time to tear
them apart and scrap them.
Since I don't know anything about RA81's yet (have never used them or opened
one up), and because I do intend to keep one or two of the drives running (a
few don't say "bad hda" on them), can someone tell me what parts I should
scavange off the dead ones that are worth keeping as spares? I know the
obvious like the light bulbs and drive select plugs, but what about
components on the inside that "those in the know" would advise I not just
pitch with the drives?
Lastly, are the casings for the RA81's mostly steel, or aluminum? I'm
pondering putting them in the van and taking to a scrap metal dealer. I
wouldn't do this, but they are clearly dead, HDA's not likely to appear, no
one wants them, and I need the space.
Jay West
> > I'd like to see the ads again.
> > The adverisments really defined just how people saw the techology.
>
> I think I still have a Poly Paks data sheet for a uA709
> op-amp (TO- 99). Was pretty amazing stuff back then.
I grew up in Wakefield Massachusetts. I used to ride my bike over to
PolyPaks and raid their dumpster on a regular basis. It looks like they
used to get all sorts of stuff for evaluation that they'd toss.
Sometimes I'd have money to spend there too.
--- Ethan Dicks <ethan.dicks at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 11/5/06, Roger Merchberger
> <zmerch-cctalk at 30below.com> wrote:
> > Under the IC listing, I found an $80 8Mhz Moto
> 68000!?!?!?!
> > Ye gods!!!
>
> Wow! I'm Rich!
>
> Personally, I'd queal if I had to pay more than
> $5-$10 for a 68000-8.
>
> -ethan
>
Well, I paid about $10 USD (?5 GBP) for 3 68000
processors and that included P&P to the UK.
Regards,
Andrew B
aliensrcooluk at yahoo.co.uk
It would appear that the slots designated "MEMORY" in the 11/44 (slots 9-12
in the *system* backplane) are actually "Extended Unibus" slots. My reading
is that these slots allow 22 bits of memory addressing instead of 18.
So, of they are still "unibus" slots, does that mean that if there is one
board in slot 9, that slots 10-12 should have grant continuity cards (G727)?
If they are unibus slots I would certainly think so, but they are designated
for memory only... and I can't find any reference to using grant cards there
for non-populated memory slots.
Anyone know off the top of their head?
Jay
On 11/5/06, Chuck Guzis <cclist at sydex.com> wrote:
> On 4 Nov 2006 at 11:19, woodelf wrote:
>
> > We want poly-packs back ... how do I get my 2 cent 7400's with 3 working gates
> > each for my next big project. :)
>
> When ICs were very dear, PP wasn't such a bad deal, even if they
> offered mostly floor sweepings. I was surprised at how many ICs in
> one of their assortments didn't even have plating on the pins.
>
> But I last bought from PP when RTL and DTL were all the rage.
Back in that era, I wasn't buying too many parts, but I remember
looking over all the stuff they would cram in their ads and wishing I
had a few bucks to scrape together.
-ethan
Do you know of a group(s) exchanging Radio Shack
Science Fair manuals?
I'm thinking of rolling all of these into torrent(s)
as I get them collected.
I have manuals (that I can scan in, in a few phases)
for:
28-249 "200 in 1"
28-267 "75 in One"
& need manuals
28-245 "20 in 1"
28-259 "130 in One"
Thanks much!
Brian
P.S. Radio Shack itself has a scattered few like
(280-0161) "30-in-1"
http://support.radioshack.com/support_games/doc18/18973.htm
-----------------------------------
"Going back to 2003 and a post you made about the
Radio Shack Science Fair 10 in 1... :)
I have a manual for the 28-225 if you would like a
scanned copy.
Just let me know."
http://www.classiccmp.org/pipermail/cctalk/2005-June/196536.html
____________________________________________________________________________________
Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail
(http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/mailbeta/)
--- Robert Borsuk <rborsuk at colourfull.com> wrote:
> Hi,
> Anyone interested in a TI 99/4a Editor / Assemble
r
> manual and two
> floppies? (no cartridges)
> Figure $8 priority mail shipping.
>
> If no one claims it, it's going in the trash.
>
> Rob
>
If no-one claims it by next Saturday the I'll
take them. I don't have a TI 99/4a at present,
but might end up with one in the future :) Even
if I don't, the manual will be an interesting
read ;)
Regards,
Andrew B
aliensrcooluk at yahoo.co.uk
Added some new Exidy Sorcerer docs up today. The Sorcerer S-100 Expansion Unit Technical Manual and the Software Internals Manual for the Sorcerer. They're in my Exidy section on my site at http://www.trailingedge.com/exidy/
-----
David Williams
http://www.trailingedge.com
Looking for a disk image for a dead floppy. The disk is WATCOM VX-REXX Version 2.0, made in 1994 for OS/2. I just need an Image of disk 2/2. Can provide an image of my original disks and manuals if you like. Winimage format is fine, contact me offlist.
Thanks,
TZ
Hi,
Anyone interested in a TI 99/4a Editor / Assembler manual and two
floppies? (no cartridges)
Figure $8 priority mail shipping.
If no one claims it, it's going in the trash.
Rob
Check out this auction
----- Original Message -----
From: "Neil Morrison" <neilsmorr at gmail.com>
To: "M100 List" <m100 at list.30below.com>
Sent: Saturday, November 04, 2006 11:44 AM
Subject: eBay: Tandy PDD2 Portable Disk Drive 2 - Mint Cond
>
> http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=150051417513
>
> Winning bid: US $306.00
>
> Glad I got mine long ago!!
>
> Neil
>
>
>
The time has come for me to let go of the collection - I want my
basement and garage back, and I just lost interest and don't have the
time any more.
I have an assortment of stuff, inlcuding a complete PCJr, a Kaypro II
with bunches of disks, some Tandy stuff, and a couple of older Macs,
along with several boxes of old Byte magazines.
I donated a big lot of it to another collector several years ago, and
this is what I had kept. But now it's time for even that to go - I'm
keeping my first VIC-20 and my Amigas, along with one Mac SE/30 just for
fun.
I started listing stuff on *bay, but I no longer have time or easy
access to the place where I used to ship from, and I'm just too busy to
do it now anyway.
If this interests you, please email me offline and I can give you some
more details. If I don't hear from anyone in a week, I'm afraid it's
going to the recycler.
--
Paul Braun
Valparaiso, IN
"There's a fine line between stupid, and clever." - David St. Hubbins
"Enjoy every sandwich." - Warren Zevon
"The Fountain of Youth is a state of mind." - The Ides of March
--- Fred Cisin <cisin at xenosoft.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 3 Nov 2006, Robert Feldman wrote:
> > No, quipus were to record information, not perfo
rm
> computations or logic.
> > Also, they appeared a couple of thousand years
> after Stonehenge. Most quipus
> > are Inka, which date them after ca. 1100 AD,
> although, IIRC, there are Wari
> > quipus (ca 500AD). The Moche (200 BC-400AD)
> possibly used colored beans in a
> > similar way (the first bean counters!).
>
> Oldest found so far is about 3000BC !
>
> http://archaeology.about.com/od/ancientwriting/a/c
aralquipu.htm
>
Wow, that is old.
All this talk of quipu's reminds me of one of my
favourite cartoon shows from the early 80's -
Mysterious Cities Of Gold. I don't suppose
anyone knows of any games based on it?
Regards,
Andrew B
aliensrcooluk at yahoo.co.uk
aliensrcooluk at yahoo.co.uk wrote:
Wow, that is old.
All this talk of quipu's reminds me of one of my
favourite cartoon shows from the early 80's -
Mysterious Cities Of Gold. I don't suppose
anyone knows of any games based on it?
Regards,
Andrew B
-------------------------------------------------------------
I share your love of the series. It only showed up for one run in the US.
Just didn't draw and audience. Apparently the DVD set is out in the original
French. And there are a lot of DVDs in English that come up on eBay. But
they are rips and of very poor quality. Plus none of the commentary.
I've seen a game a couple of times on eBay. But it seemed to be a
children's game and was in French. You might point your eBay preferences to
include the French auctions.
If they ever release it in an authorized DVD, I'll certainly buy it. Right
now, I have some poor mpg2's that I found on a black IRC channel a few years
ago.
Billy
-------------Original Message:
From: "Chuck Guzis" <cclist at sydex.com>
Subject: Re: Discussion of large systems
No matter how you cut it, sorting on tape beat sorting cards on unit
record equipment...
Cheers,
Chuck
--------------Reply:
Mind you, an 082/083 sorter with cards feeding across and dropping into
their compartments is as much a part of the "old computer" image as
spinning tape reels...
And considering the cost of CPU time and the fact that input data was
still on punched cards in most cases, it was usually more efficient and
cost-effective to still sort the cards off-line and then copy/merge to/with
tape.
Ah, fond memories of carrying stacks of 5-6000 cards across the room
to the collator (or, later, the high-speed card reader), not to mention the
inevitable day when you bumped into someone and scattered half a
megabyte of data across the data centre floor and under the machinery;
now _that_'s fragmentation!
m
All this fuss is idiotic. A knowledge base and a wiki are COMPLETELY
DIFFERENT THINGS. There was already a recent discussion about whether
classiccmp should have a wiki, and the concensus was "not at this time" as
Jay already noted. Further discussion is always welcome in an environment
like cctalk, but geez, people should read up on the recent history before
spouting about the same old things without adding anything new.
Meanwhile lots of people are complaining that the existing KB is lame and
sparse. Those people should sign off from their email and go add
something constructive to the KB instead of critizing what Jay and others
have already done for it. It's the fault of users, not the underlying
technology, if nobody adds to the database -- no amount of CMS or wiki or
anything else will help with that.
A related and remarkable resource, which is less a Wiki and more of a
blog, is Paul McJones' "Dusty Decks" page:
http://www.mcjones.org/dustydecks/
This is so monumentally great and exactly what should be done at this
point in computer/software/emulation history, taking advantage of the
web in exactly the right way.
-----
Abosolutely! He's one of the cornerstones of CHM's software preservation SIG
I really wish there was more work of this quality going on.
> In particular any manuals concerning the maintenance of early monitors (the
> monochrome monitor that was attached to the old Sun-1)
Moniterm or Philips?
Sun bought generic Multibus cases for the original desktop units. The most
common monitors in them were made by either Moniterm or Philips. Moniterm
monitors are notorious for flyback failures.
A related and remarkable resource, which is less a Wiki and more of a
blog, is Paul McJones' "Dusty Decks" page:
http://www.mcjones.org/dustydecks/
He does a very excellent job of tying together multiple resources
around the web, relating them to real computer history of wide general
interest.
Paul brings together several ingredients here:
1. A genuine interest in computer and especially software history in
the context of the entire industry.
2. Knowledge of many others around the world who are doing solid work
on the subject, including collecting/storing/making available hardcopy
documents, reading old media, emulating old systems, etc.
3. Links to the others who are doing the work, often showing the output
of the work.
4. A blog-type format that show shis personal interest but also shows
that the work being done is relevant and important.
5. Incorporating comments/replies/etc. into his page.
This is so monumentally great and exactly what should be done at this
point in computer/software/emulation history, taking advantage of the
web in exactly the right way.
I should point out that there are some more scholarly and museum-like
efforts going on at the same time, but none present the work and details
and results nearly as openly and vividly as Paul does.
Tim.
MessageHi,
Looking for any of the early Sun manuals - eg the multibus Sun-1 era. In particular any manuals concerning the maintenance of early monitors (the monochrome monitor that was attached to the old Sun-1) and/or the early multibus Sun processor boards/FP board/CG1 board.
Many thanks!
Ian.
---------------------------------
Want to start your own business? Learn how on Yahoo! Small Business.
Arrived today from New Jersey. Staying in Mountain View. Open to meeting
other collectors tonight / tomorrow for fun times, computer chat, drinks,
etc. .... cell-able at 646-546-9999. - Evan
Another part of computing history that seems almost completely
forgotten is ledger card systems, which is what many small offices
(if they weren't doing things manually) were using before PCs
came along and for quite a few years afterwards.
With magnetic stripes on the back of the cards, paper tape I/O
and/or high speed digital cassette drives, automatic feeder/stackers,
(relatively) high-speed card readers, and datacomm capabilities,
they were certainly true computers by any criterion.
I recall one of my Burroughs L installations which would have 4
cassette drives randomly zipping back and forth (much quieter than
your tape drives, actually quite pleasant to listen to) and an auto-reader
going through a deck of ledger cards, while another set of cards was
being fed into the printing console, stripe read and updated, printed
(along with 2 reports being printed simultaneously on the same
independent-dual-carriage 255x10cpi 2-colour dot-matrix printer),
and stacked in the back, all without any operator intervention;
fun to watch.
I'll have to dig around & see if I can find the core memory card from an
E series machine that I used to have lying around somewhere...
m
I have a terminal server (NIB) but it didn't come with any of the
cabling for connecting a gaggle of serial devices to the server. I
could always make one, but its pretty tedious. I'd consider buying
them for a reasonable price from someone who has some they're not
using.
Thanks!
--
"The Direct3D Graphics Pipeline" -- DirectX 9 draft available for download
<http://www.xmission.com/~legalize/book/download/index.html>
All:
I have a question. I'm getting a Tandy 2000 that doesn't have a
color monitor (it comes with a VM-1 monochrome). I've read that you could
use a third-party (i.e., non-Tandy) color monitor like the old NEC
Multi-Sync, but I was wondering if a modern VGA monitor could be used if I
made a 9-pin to 15-pin adapter.
Thanks for any hints.
Rich
Rich Cini
Collector of classic computers
Lead engineer, Altair32 Emulator
Web site: <http://highgate.comm.sfu.ca/~rcini/classiccmp/>
http://highgate.comm.sfu.ca/~rcini/classiccmp/
Web site: http://www.altair32.com/
/***************************************************/
On 2 Nov, 2006, at 18:00, cctech-request at classiccmp.org wrote:
> The Versatec V80 electrostatic printer is another odd beast -- it
> builds up a charge image on special paper and then flows liquid toner
> over it (yes, I have one, and not just beacuae it was one printer
> supported on the PERQ).
We used to have a V80 on long term loan from Versatec so we could
develop a 'GreenSheet' interface card for the NuBus slots in the older
Macs along with driver software to drive their wide (up to six foot)
electrostatic and Laser printers. It never gave us any problems, so
few moving parts to give trouble. I wonder, can you still get the
bottles of toner or do you mix your own?
On the subject of peripherals, my 1301 has a card reader, card punch,
line printer, paper tape reader (Elliott type) and a non standard
paper tape punch (Teletype BRPE). I'm not sure if the drums really
count as peripherals, but I have two connected, 12000 words by 48 bits
and of course the mag tape drives from my recent e-mail.
The second machine has card reader, card punch, printer, one drum
and more tape decks (13 in total).
More modern, I have an Apple Imagewriter 2 and some of the older
Apple parallel printers made by C.Itoh to connect to the Apple 3 and
the Lisa. Shortly before I joined the list we chucked out one of the
original Apple Laserwriters and their DaisyWheel printer. They both
still worked but took up too much space (and the LaserWriter made
a lot of Ozone). If anyone has one of the old HP electrostatics
printers (A1 size or D size to the guys in the states), I still have
some
bits from it, the ink pump, the big transformer and some rollers. I
have quite a few manuals for pen plotters and some printers from the
eighties if anyone is lacking a manual for their plotter.
--- Jim Battle <frustum at pacbell.net> wrote:
> aliensrcooluk at yahoo.co.uk wrote:
> ...
> > Can we *please* stop acting like kids? As I
> > figure (forgive me if I'm wrong) it most of you
> > guys are in your 50's/60's. The only exceptions
> > I know of are myself (27, before you ask)
> > and Cameron Kaiser (Cameron, I got a copy
> > of Robert Bernardo's footage from both
> > CommVEx 2005 & 2006 and would like to say
> > that even though I don't own a C64 I love
> > the intro to Geotrope).
> >
>
> Andrew --
>
> There are many people (hundreds) under 50 on this
> list. A couple years
> ago there was a thread about demographics. You
> should also be aware
> that there are > 1000 people on the list, even if
> most don't post very
> often.
>
Ahhh, ok.
*feels this >< big*
I didn't know the list had >1000
members. I thought it was more around the
500 mark. Either way, it's still alot of people.
That said, the demographics have probably
changed slightly.
Regards,
Andrew B
aliensrcooluk at yahoo.co.uk
> On Nov 2, 2006, at 12:47 PM, woodelf wrote:
> >> Not to be argumentative, but you sound exactly like someone who's
> >> never
> >> really participated in a wiki-centric community.
> >> If you tried it (and correct me if you have), you might find you
> >> like it.
> >
> > Well I like email-lists ( other than send.me.spam :) ) since I
> > don't have to navigate thru a web site. How soon do you expect the
> > wiki will have 'Pee Cee' stuff on it, my guess is 15 minutes or
> > a sex ad posted.
>
> Yep. It's rare for a community survive a mailing list -> wiki
> transition. Things that start out as wikis seem to do ok, but they
> tend to attract a slightly different crowd...those who think a web
> browser is "how you access the Internet". ;)
>
> -Dave
And I think that if those wanting classiccmp to "go wiki" would try some classic computer searches
at wikipedia.org (assuming they haven't already done so), they'd find that there's already a
tremendous amount of technical and historical information there with more easily added by anyone
who desires to. And, of course, new topics can be created if some system you have expertise on
isn't represented.
Of course, I might be misunderstanding their request since I'm not familiar with wiki sites being
used as substitutes for email groups. Perhaps there's some great advantage of which I'm not
aware. However, since the wiki topic has apparently been discussed here before at length and
didn't meet with approval, I'll go with those previous conclusions.
__________________________________________________________________________________________
Check out the New Yahoo! Mail - Fire up a more powerful email and get things done faster.
(http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/mailbeta)
I've got a bunch (maybe 10) of the 50 pin blue-ribbon connector SCSI-
1 cables. Most are about a foot long, though some are longer. I've
also got a bunch of 10base2 50 ohm RG-58/U coax cables with BNC's on
each end. Several are 10 foot, a couple are longer. Heck, I'll even
throw in a bunch of terminators and tees.
Anyone interested in the whole lot for the cost of postage?
Cheers,
Chuck
> > Tony Duell wrote:
> >
> > > You do. It saved them having to fit a tokenising routine into the ROM.
> > >
> > > So how do you distinguish 'calculator' from 'computer'?
> > They work better as a door jam. :)
>
> Except that a common name for the ZX81 over here was the 'black
> doorwedge' :-)
>
> -tony
That's what Commodore used them for:
"Under this steady promotional blitz [of the C64], plus a trade-in option that offered a $100
rebate on any other computer or video game console (a clever New York chain called Crazy Eddy
started selling the cheap Timex Sinclair 1000, an Americanised Sinclair ZX-81, for $10 so that
users could get the rebate; Commodore donated most of them to charity but kept some, reportedly,
for doorstops!), sales skyrocketed and the C64 eclipsed its older sibling within a short time."
http://www.floodgap.com/retrobits/ckb/secret/history.html
____________________________________________________________________________________
Get your email and see which of your friends are online - Right on the New Yahoo.com
(http://www.yahoo.com/preview)
--- Julian Wolfe <fireflyst at earthlink.net> wrote:
> >
> > NO ONE SAID THAT CLASSICCMP WAS GOING TO BECOME
A
> WIKI, AND
> > STOP BEING A MAILING LIST.
> >
> > NO ONE.
>
> Starting Monday, it will only be available via WAI
S.
>
Huh?! I hope you are joking Julian, as it is
Jay in charge of this list. I have no desire to
move to Wiki. I enjoy reading emails from the
list.
Can we *please* stop acting like kids? As I
figure (forgive me if I'm wrong) it most of you
guys are in your 50's/60's. The only exceptions
I know of are myself (27, before you ask)
and Cameron Kaiser (Cameron, I got a copy
of Robert Bernardo's footage from both
CommVEx 2005 & 2006 and would like to say
that even though I don't own a C64 I love
the intro to Geotrope).
Sheesh......
Andrew B
aliensrcooluk at yahoo.co.uk
I have a paper tray for an Apple Laserwriter Select, free for price of
postage.
--
David Griffith
dgriffi at cs.csubak.edu
A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
> I think a wiki would be a nice adjunct. It could become something like
> an "annotated bitsavers" if we all put things there.
I have been thinking of something like that for a long time. There are lots
of little tidbits I've collected on systems that aren't documents. A few
show up in the 'pdf' directory because I think they're important (like
histories and bibliographies). Problem is I have so many documents
backlogged that I never get around to creating the commentary (with
REFERENCES d**m it!).
That's pretty much why I just update related entries on wikipedia and add
pointers to the source documentation on bitsavers.
This does bring up the point that expanding the wikipedia entries is a good
thing too, and would have a wider audience than a specialty wiki. There is
the start of a software related wiki on the Computer History Museum's
Software Preservation SIG http://community.computerhistory.org/scc/scwiki
But there isn't any content there yet.
Hi Cosmac experts,
recently I got hands on a Cosmac 1802 Evaluation Kit Rev 2
(CDP18S020). There is a a "Cosmac CDP18S021 Micro Terminal"
as well. I want to restore this kit and would be very happy
to get hands on a user manual with schematics for this!
Google did not bring up the desired result.
In powering up the unit, the 1802 executes "Wait for DMA or
IRQ (0x00)" permanently and thus the micro terminal stays
black as well. There is a firmware ROM CDPR522 on the unit
and all datasheets are available on the www. Only the chip
labeled "RCA 640" within the micro terminal are mystic,
but a schematic might help here, too.
Any hints where to get the user manual or a copy of it?
Best regards,
Erik.
I saw a mention of the laserwriters by Roger Holmes in his posting, and
remembered I have some to get rid of as well. I have them in Anaheim,
Ca. They are free take if you pick them up.
Probably no interest for the same reason he chucked his (size and ozone)
but better to ask before the act.
I originally planned to use them with older sun systems, since they could
substitute for the Sun laserwriters, but since have gone to the freebie
ghostscript stack to print what .ps files I need.
The larger sun laserwriters were fast and clean, but not for the
faint hearted to set up. The apple writers matched the lower end
ones with the movement similar to the HP laserwriter 2's.
I'm also inclined to chuck the Laserwriter 2 I have, if there is
interest in that.
The Apple laserwriters are untested. The Laserwriter moves
paper, but is in need of attention to work.
Jim
Just had this offer from someone: "I am having a clear out and have a couple
of Mac IIs, 2 good colour monitors and various peripherals including a b/w
laserwriter and scanner."
We've got all the Apple stuff that we need (with the exception of a Lisa 1 ;)
but maybe someone else on the list can rescue these. They're free for pickup
>from Cradley Heath - yell at me off-list if you want them and I'll pass on
contact details...
cheers
Jules
------------Original Message:
From: "Chuck Guzis" <cclist at sydex.com>
Subject: Re: Discussion of large systems
>On 2 Nov 2006 at 10:25, M H Stein wrote:
> And considering the cost of CPU time and the fact that input data was
> still on punched cards in most cases, it was usually more efficient and
> cost-effective to still sort the cards off-line and then copy/merge to/with
> tape.
I suppose that relibility was about the same--the chance of creating
a mangled card in unit-record gear was probably about the same as
that of mangling it in a 1442.
------------Reply:
Reminds me of my very first night working in a unit record shop:
Was running an invoicing job on a 402 with a 514 punching the new
summary cards; loaded the feed hoppers with cards and went upstairs
for a smoke and a chat with my new boss. Came back down to reload
the hoppers about a half hour later, but there were only two or three
cards punched in the 514 instead of the 200 or so expected, and one
card sticking out from under the machine cover. Opened the cover
and the other 197 or so cards literally exploded out of the machine, torn,
accordioned and with nice black stripes where they'd passed through
the drive gears into the machine's innards instead of into the output stacker.
Figured it was going to be a good place to work when the boss joined
me in the keypunch room and helped with finding and putting the torn
fragments back together in order to manually repunch them. Got pretty
good at reading cards that night...
m
Some TV bonehead (I've come to realize that anyone who works in TV is a
bonehead) e-mailed me last night to tell me he "desperately" needs a "cool
looking" computer terminal for a commercial shoot this weekend.
If anyone has a terminal they think looks "cool" and would like to earn
some cash, e-mail me prontolitiously.
Do not reply to this message because I'm not subscribed to the list. If
you do reply even after having just been told that I'm not subscribed,
you too will be deemed a bonehead.
Contact me directly.
--
Sellam Ismail Vintage Computer Festival
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
International Man of Intrigue and Danger http://www.vintage.org
[ Old computing resources for business || Buy/Sell/Trade Vintage Computers ]
[ and academia at www.VintageTech.com || at http://marketplace.vintage.org ]
On 2 Nov, 2006, at 18:00, cctech-request at classiccmp.org wrote:
>>> Does anyone have enough tape drives that they can do the
>>> multi-drive merge/sort tape algorithms described in Knuth's
>>> Art of Computer Programming?
>>
>>
>> That would be six, I believe. But, why? Just to say one did it?
>> In today's world, the way to implement the same algorithm would be to
>> use disk files; MUCH faster. With a TERABYTE of screaming fast disk
An ICT 1301 can support up to eight half inch tape decks. I actually
have
13 decks in total, though currently I only have three of them running.
Only one of them can both read and write, though that is the next
thing on the
list to be sorted out. We need to write an 'All Ones' tape to re-
calibrate the
read amplifiers (ten per deck). Then hopefully we will not be relying
on the
error correction circuitry to correct the single bit errors we are
currently
getting almost all the time. Maybe next year I could get six or seven
decks
working but our priority is to read the libraries of software
recorded on the
very old tapes. Surprisingly this seems to be possible, we have
already read
some data off a tape written 30 years ago or more. At only 300 frames
per
inch the bits are so much bigger they are less likely to degrade (I
hope).
There is an engineer's facility to 'Read All Tracks' which we will
use to
read the entire tape, hopefully without stopping and send all 40MB
to a parallel port we are building with a built in FIFO. The data
will then
hopefully be captured onto a modern machine. We will repeat this two or
three times on different decks and then analyse the data to produce the
original (up to 10MB of data per reel). There may be some digits we will
not be sure of due to multiple bit failures in a single frame, but we
will
at least know which ones they are. The regular read hardware just says
which blocks have one of more frames with multi bit failures.
I am hoping to extend the computer room, get both my 1301s assembled and
have all 13 decks in a row. There's no plans yet to get the second 1301
running but I want to get it at least bolted together whilst there is
a glimmer
of a memory in my head as to how to do it. I have a quite a few years
to go
before senility (I hope), but it is already 30 years since I took
that beast apart
and the ink on the labels I carefully applied has now faded away to
almost
nothing.
There will be room for a small exhibition of other stuff, props used
in the making
of the 'Darling Buds of May', some old Apple computers, ][, ][e, ///,
Lisa and
some older Macs, plus a mechanical calculator, a wind up gramaphone,
a 19th century pounds shillings and pence till made by NCR, an Eddison
drum (grooves not magnetic) dictating machine and player, and maybe
some stuff which is currently in my office, an HP7475 plotter, a big old
HP DraftMaster MX+ plotter and various other items I have not had the
heart to throw in the skip over the years. Oh and my UK101 computer
maybe. It'll only be open one day a year to the general public when we
hold a classic car show at the farm.
Surprisingly this seems to be possible, we have already read
some data off a tape written 30 years ago or more. At only 300 frames
Per inch the bits are so much bigger they are less likely to degrade (I
hope).
There is an engineer's facility to 'Read All Tracks' which we will
use to read the entire tape, hopefully without stopping and send all 40MB
to a parallel port we are building with a built in FIFO. The data
will then hopefully be captured onto a modern machine.
--
If you are interested, I could probably get you one of these when they're
available
http://bitsavers.org/tools/wizl/tapewizl/
Paul Pierce built something similar to what you did for recovering 7-track
data, and discovered that you really need to recover the data using analog
techniques to get any reliability.
http://www.piercefuller.com/collect/proj.html
Jay West wrote:
> I posted about this board before and one or more people said they had
one.
> Now I'm curious if anyone has documentation for it :)
Ooh, if only you had asked me a few years ago!
> This is a 3rd party quad height unibus board and appears to be a 4
port SLU.
> The manufacturer is ACT, and the only part numbers I can find on the
board
> are 10015000, 10015001, and 10015002.
These were very common for 20 years as DL11-alikes.
You might have better luck if you identified the manufacturer as "Able"
instead of "ACT". They call it a "Quadrasync".
Tim.
I posted about this board before and one or more people said they had one.
Now I'm curious if anyone has documentation for it :)
This is a 3rd party quad height unibus board and appears to be a 4 port SLU.
The manufacturer is ACT, and the only part numbers I can find on the board
are 10015000, 10015001, and 10015002.
There are 4 rotary dials (my guess is baud rate), and one 10 position switch
bank (priority & address?). I'm curious what all the dip switch settings
are, can it start at the normal console address and thus replace an M7856,
does it have an LTC capability, etc. Pinouts for the port (berg) connectors
would be good.
I can't seem to find anything about it on bitsavers or googling. Any
pointers appreciated!
Jay West
All:
Since I couldn't find much on the web about it, I decided to snap a
couple of photos and put the information on my Durango F-85 system on
a web page.
http://www.sydex.com/durango/durango.html
I've actually got two of these things; the second has the integrated
hard disk but is otherwise the same. Does anyone think a photo of
the external hard drive (SA-4008) would be worthwhile including?
How about an old (and worthless) Durango stock certificate?
Cheers,
Chuck
I was at work and needed an EBCDIC code, came across this. A useful link if
you are using the old hardware and need a old code.
http://www.lookuptables.com/
Billy
Since several people have asked... the last batch of 82S131's I bought was
>from www.arcadechips.com
I also exchanged a few emails with the proprietor. He was very helpful,
overly considerate... and emailed me after the order came just to make sure
I got it and it was all to my satisfaction. I gotta give this guy a high
rating. Prices were good too.
As an additional resource, I have also bought fairly large (to me)
quantities of the above (and similar) proms from another place at
www.mikesarcade.com
I received the same unusually high level of service and good prices from the
second source as well.
Jay West
Chuck Guzis wrote:
Plowing through very short records (physical blocks) on an old drive
makes all sorts of interesting noise, too as the drive stops and
starts in the IRGs. I remember running a particular COBOL acceptance
test on CDC 607's that you could hear in the next county...
Cheers,
Chuck
---------------------------
It was wonderful wasn't it? And on the batch programs, all the attached
tapes would rewind at the end of a job. You could feel the noise with your
feet on the raised floor.
I think the ulitmate was one night at CERN. Some jackass was playing and
rewound all 36 tape drives at the same time. CERN was running the 1" 627's
at the time. People went streaming out of the computer room. The idiot was
banned from the 6600 permanently.
Billy
Chuck Guzis wrote:
I suspect that the Japanese printer makers were pressed to come out
with a better product because of the need for higher print resolution
when printing Kanji characters.
Cheers,
Chuck
-------------------------------
Absolutely.
That was certainly the case when I worked at Fujitsu. The 9 wire printers
were only sold in the US, weren't considered good enough for Japan. 24 wire
was standard in Japan for a few years before being sold in the US.
And it was one of the driving forces to develp the laser printer technology.
Japan had to have the finer resolution. I think that even today, most laser
engines are developed in Japan and OEM'd out.
Billy
sorry I couldn't resist ...
ard at p850ug1.demon.co.uk (Tony Duell) wrote:
> I think the distinction I normally use is often called 'keeper'. That's a
> pun on 'Key Per Function' meaning a calcultor has, say, a key labelled
> 'SIN', whereas on a computer you spell it out. Byt that definition the
> HP41 is a calculator (although you _can_ spell out the function names if
> you want to), the HP9830 most vertainly isn't.
so what does this make the Sinclair ZX-80, ZX-81 and Spectrum systems?
(I am not even sure you *could* type in the commands, I think you *had*
to press the appropriate function key).
**vp
--- Adrian Graham <witchy at binarydinosaurs.co.uk> wr
ote:
> On 1/11/06 11:05, "Jules Richardson"
> <julesrichardsonuk at yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>
> >> You do. It saved them having to fit a tokenisin
g
> routine into the ROM.
> >
> > to nit-pick:
> >
> > a) didn't the later Spectrums (128, +2, +3) with
> '128 BASIC' let you type the
> > commands without the keyword system?
>
> Yep, from the Investronica 128 (the first
> 'toastrack' edition with the Big
> Metal Heatsink?) to the +3, 128 mode let you just
> type and make your own
> mistakes.
>
Yes, you could type the keywords, but no you
couldn't make mistakes (atleast, not on my
Spectrum 128 +2) as you were forced to
correct any syntax errors before you could
type in the next line of BASIC. Or atleast
that's the case for 128K BASIC.
I never used the 48K BASIC mode.
>> snip <<
> > Heck, back to Spectrums, I remember that the +2
> had a built-in calculator
> > application... (what were the other main menu
> options? 128 BASIC, Spectrum
> > BASIC, Calculator, but I'm sure there was at lea
st
> one other)
>
> Tape tester.....
>
Err. not on my Spectrum. From top to bottom
it was:
Loader (load in tape games - equivalent to
typing Load "", IIRC)
128K BASIC
Calculator
48K BASIC
> --
> Adrian/Witchy
> Binary Dinosaurs creator/curator
> Www.binarydinosaurs.co.uk - the UK's biggest priva
te
> home computer
> collection?
>
>
For the record I still have my Spectrum in it's
original box. I had the light gun games 6-pack
version sold in the early 90's. The games were:
Robot Attack
Operation Wolf (published by Ocean)
Missile Ground Zero
Bullseye
? (some target range in the wild with 4 levels?)
Toy Bizarre
My mum, however, put it somewhere "safe"
sometime last year. It has the SNES game
Super Mario World (with all 96 levels accessed)
in with it too which I wanted to play earlier
this year to a) recharge the battery back-up
and b) cause it's great fun to play.
Needless to say we couldn't find it :(
The Spectrum manual, thankfully, is on my
shelf here in my bedroom. I read it through
thoroughly (start to finish) atleast twice
in the early 90's as I wanted to make great
games.
Just as back then, I still have lot's of
imagination and idea's for games and software.
Thanks to my Amiga and AMOS BASIC I have
been able to realise some of them. I do have
plenty more stuff to come :)
Regards,
Andrew B
aliensrcooluk at yahoo.co.uk
On 11/1/06, Richard <legalize at xmission.com> wrote:
> I agree, which is why I started collecting in two areas: serial
> terminals and graphics boxes. "Graphics boxes" includes things like
> dial boxes, button boxes and graphics tablets and even plotters.
Cool. I've always been fascinated by dial boxes and button boxes,
but, DECUS aside, never got the chance to play with many. I know they
were big with SGI systems, but my experiences tended to run to DEC and
Sun more than SGI.
(here's an ASCIIfied doc I found on the VAX 8000 dial box - very
cool... now I want one ;-)
http://deathrow.vistech.net/~cvisors/DEC94MDS/vsxdatm1.txt
> However, I see things like large line printers and other such early
> printing peripherals seem to be rare. They only seem to appear in
> people's collections if they were part of a big bundle.
I have a LP05-type line printer and several smaller DEC printers
(LA-180, LA36...)
The LP05 is awaiting some attention, but my first LA-180 saw a lot of
use its first few years... I bought it from Newman Computer Exchange
in the mid-1980s to hang off of my PDP-8/a when they sent me a "free
shipping on your next order" coupon. I looked through their catalog
and picked out the heaviest item I thought I could get some use out
of. A few days later, a van shows up with a palletized printer.
Fortunately for me, a couple of years later, I got a contract job
writing PDP-11 software and really _needed_ that printer (and equally
fortunately, the $300 PDP-11/23 I picked up to do the work already had
an LPV11 installed).
I can't say that I had as much need for a true line printer fifteen
years later, but they are cool to watch work.
> Any other peripheral collectors out there?
I collect CPUs _and_ peripherals, if that counts.
-ethan
To all who wanted M9312 boot roms burned, I've completed that today. I'll
have them out in the mail by the end of the week. Expect an email after they
are sent with total cost.
Jay
>
>Subject: A question regarding floppy drives functionality..
> From: Marian Capel <marian.capel at bluewin.ch>
> Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 18:26:22 +0100
> To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
>
>Since this list has a number of people that are very knowledgable on the
>subject :
>
>Am i correct in thinking that, given a custom FDC, i could run a modern
>1.44 floppy in FM mode, and at much lower data rates i.e. (say 50 KHz.) ?
You may not be able to run that slow but you could test by recording square
waves of varying frequencies and look at what comes back.
>Background : I am musing on how to give a small amount of storage, say
>around 100kb, to a very small low tech cpu.
>I do not care about speed and efficiency.
Myself for 100k I'd use a EEprom. Eprom or even 128k ram with a battery.
>I am aware that IDE-based solutions are simpler, both hard- and software
>wise, but I would prefer a floppy based solution.
FYI the slowest floppies are the oldest 5.25 like the SA400 and TM100
as they will reach down to 64khz, I did some testing once. I'd suspect
some of the later 360k drives would do well (slow data) too. I do
know that most of the 360k drives work fine at FM (single density) data
rates (125khz).
Allison
I just brought up my /34a and apparently it's sick. It has one DD11-PK.
Configuration is as follows:
1 - M8266 (A-F)
2 - M8265 (A-F)
3 - M9312 (A-B), M7859 (C-F)
4 - M7891 (A-F)
5 - Grant (D)
6 - Grant (D)
7 - Grant (D)
8 - Grant (D)
9 - M9302 (A-B), Grant (D)
What works:
Storing & retreiving various patterns from ram via the front panel works
fine in all cases.
Looping on CLR PC loops as expected
Looping on BR . loops as expected
Trap catcher works (first pass halts at 1030 filling ram, then a BR . loops
as expected).
The memory address test program fails though. It halts at 246 indicating a
memory addressing error. R1 points to 422. Examining memory via the front
panel shows the following:
420 420
422 177355
424 177353
426 177351
430 177347
So it looks to me like it is able to store 420 in 420, but nothing after
that. I would normally think there is a problem with the memory board
(M7891). However, I have replaced that board with 2 others, and all 3 boards
fail at the same address AND with the same values. I find that likely to
rule out the memory board as really being bad. In addition, I can deposit
and examine values to locations 420 through 430 via the front panel just
fine. It's my understanding that the KY11-LB puts data in memory via the
unibus, so I would think this makes it somewhat unlikely to be a backplane
issue. Is it a strong likelyhood that the problem is the cpu set itself
then, as that's what would be writing the values to memory during the
address test?
And as I type this, I just noticed something interesting. The numbers stored
in ram at 422 through 430 are the right numbers, just inverted logic. More
specifically if you invert all the bits in 177355 you get 422, if you invert
all the bits in 177353 you get 424, inverting 177351 gives 426 (all the
latter values being what I'd expect). I'm guessing there's a dead inverter
on the cpu set somewhere perhaps? But if that's the case, why does 420 get
set to 420 correctly??
Any advice is most appreciated :)
Jay West
> Now that you have the only purely German mainframe (TR-440), is there any
> software with it, like BSM or PS440 or TEXAS etc.? Any software for the
> Zuse machines?
CHM won't have the machines until early December. The material on the TR 440
that I've put up on bitsavers was from the existing corporate archive. There
is one entire container of documentation and software, and there were
Telefunken tapes and documentation there. A simulation would be an obvious
thing to attempt. It will be difficult to do here, though, since most of the
documentation will be in German.
Hi
Is there a way to clean printer heads from the outside, rather than
allowing so much ink to be wasted by the machine blowing the ink through
the heads to clean them.
(This must be in a FAQ. I just need to be pointed to where this has
been discussed a thousand times already.)
A bit of background:
I have an Epson CX6600 printer/scanner that has suddenly quit printing.
The company sent the machine to me to replace an earlier model that
developed the same problem.
Maybe this machine has the same problem, or maybe it just needs head a
more aggressive cleaning.
I've "blown the jets" a few times, using over half the ink in the
cartridges to do it, and the machine still barely leaves an image on the
paper.
(I keep a towel over my printers when I don't use them, and no one
smokes in the house.)
I'm hoping to avoid taking the time to crate and ship this machine as
well. I'm not really interested in another replacement anyway.
Thanks in advance for any help.
Greg P.
Zane H. Healy wrote:
You mean you don't have how to create your own EBCDIC table memorized? I
memorized it over 16 years ago, and oddly enough I still remember it.
Zane
Sorry. I grew up in the world of BCD and 6 bit characters. CDC finally
started cutting in ASCII in the late 60's, but with little enthusiasm.
EBCDIC is something I only encounter when restoring old IBM et al machines.
And even then, usually it is just the codes that were perverted into vendor
unique control characters that I have to question.
Billy
or it's progenitor rather:
http://cgi.ebay.com/Collectible-Personal-Computer-PCs-Limited-brand_W0QQite…
funny, you can get a new Dell for less cash though.
Ouch. And that appears to be a goofy Tandy monitor
sitting atop. Don't that really sweeten the pot.
____________________________________________________________________________________
Want to start your own business? Learn how on Yahoo! Small Business
(http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com)
Since this list has a number of people that are very knowledgable on the
subject :
Am i correct in thinking that, given a custom FDC, i could run a modern
1.44 floppy in FM mode, and at much lower data rates i.e. (say 50 KHz.) ?
Background : I am musing on how to give a small amount of storage, say
around 100kb, to a very small low tech cpu.
I do not care about speed and efficiency.
I am aware that IDE-based solutions are simpler, both hard- and software
wise, but I would prefer a floppy based solution.
Jos Dreesen
>>Surviving systems from before 1975 are very rare animals, esp mainframes,
>>since so many of them have been scrapped for precious metals. Sadly, there
>>is even less software that has survived. CHM didn't start seriously
>>collecting documentation nor software prior to the move to the West Coast in
>>the 90's. While they have an impressive collection of hardware, and a pretty
>>decent collection of US computer documentation now, the software holdings
>>pre 1975 are minimal.
How many 1970s era or earlier mainframes are actually up and running
(or in working condition) somewhere? I have not really followed mainframe
collecting, although I did work on IBM 370 and 30xx mainframes in the 1980s.
Ashley
Hi Jules and all
>I suppose my Acorn System One is probably my smallest system - two Eurocards,
Sharp PC 1500.
Used it while studying. Had all my formulas in there, from integration
to hex conversion.
"Tricked it out" by adding a 32K ram on a PCB in the place of the normal
16K memory module.
I have the manuals to program the thing in assembler so it definitely
counts as a computer not a programmable calculator (I do regard the
smaller Sharp jobbies as glorified calculators even if they have
BASIC and a full mini-keyboard.
W
I've got 3 16"x9" (approx) boards here, 2 of which are RX02 related, the
other I'm not so sure.
The first 2:
M7744 RX02 Floppy Disk Controller
M7745 RX02 R/W Control
.
The 3rd, covered in (mostly) 74xxx logic with 5 berg connectors, no DEC
style letter+4 digit code, just the words 'DRIVE LOGIC' screened onto side
2.
No idea if they are working boards.
As I don't have any other kit they might conceivably be useful for, all are
free to anyone prepared to cover postage, bear in mind I'm in Chester, UK.
Cheers,
Pete
--
Pete Edwards
"Prediction is very difficult, especially if it's about the future" - Niels
Bohr
On 10/29/06, Jules Richardson <julesrichardsonuk at yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> :-)
> I suppose my Acorn System One is probably my smallest system - two Eurocards,
> about 100 x 160 x 30mm in size, complete with built-in keypad, display, tape,
> and expansion interfaces.
>
> My Sinclair ZX81 is probably next - but of course lacks a display so needs a
> TV in order to really be useful...
>
> cheers
>
> Jules
>
Would my Microchip PIC18F1320s count? They're 18-pin DIP packages
with built-in serial port (USART), RAM, EEPROM data storage... But of
course it requires a tiny amount of support circuitry and a PC to burn
useful software onto it. (I did, however, have one hooked up to a
terminal to play Tic Tac Toe, though ;)
My actual smallest whole computer are probably my Apple Newton
MessagePads (OMP, 110, or 130). Second to that is my Dauphin DTR-1
with keyboard and pen, and the last of the complete small systems are
probably my Epson PX-8s, and my TRS-80 Model 100s. I miss my Timex
Sinclair 1000. Poor thing got stepped on by a careless friend one
day...
Josef
--
"I laugh because I dare not cry. This is a crazy world
and the only way to enjoy it is to treat it as a joke."
-- Hilda "Sharpie" Burroughs,
"The Number of the Beast" by Robert A. Heinlein
Since this list has a number of people that are very knowledgable on the
subject :
Am i correct in thinking that, given a custom FDC, i could run a modern
1.44 floppy in FM mode, and at much lower data rates i.e. (say 50 KHz.) ?
Background : I am musing on how to give a small amount of storage, say
around 100kb, to a very small low tech cpu.
I do not care about speed and efficiency.
I am aware that IDE-based solutions are simpler, both hard- and software
wise, but I would prefer a floppy based solution.
Jos Dreesen
On 31 Oct, 2006, at 18:01, cctech-request at classiccmp.org wrote:
> But when I think of mainframe I think of
> processor + storage along with a bunch of terminals attached; both
> of those
> systems are more data processors (albeit general purpose ones) than
> something
> capable of supporting several human users.
Except the older ones did not have terminals, sometimes not even for
the operator.
Surely anything which predates the Minicomputer is by definition a
mainframe, unless
it was designed as a peripheral processor rather than intended as a
central processor.
That would let out things like the CDC 1700 which is the first
machine I learnt assembler
code on as it was no longer needed to read cards and send the data to
the main 6600
which was several miles away.
> The machine had no stack, so I wrote one for it, and
> developed a stack oriented p-machine for it.
Do you still have this?
There is a version of SCOPE/Hustler running in simulation.
> Does anyone here have the necessary hardware
> and software to read a magnetic tape in HP 3000 Store Format?
I have the equipment to read the tape at the block level at the Museum.
We are looking for early verions of MPE (that would run on Series II or III)
as well.
Hi all
>Does anyone have a copy, or preferably a scan, of the Byte article c.
>1976 entitled "WADUZITDO"?
I have, but it's in storage.
Bug me if you don't come right elsewhere.
>Is it this?
>
> http://www.geocities.com/connorbd/tarpit/waduzitdo/wdzref.html
Yes.
W
Vintage Computer Festival 9.0
Saturday, November 4 through Sunday, November 5
Computer History Museum
Mountain View, California
http://www.vintage.org/2006/main/
Howdy Folks!
Just a few more days of meaningless toil and then you'll be in vintage
computing heaven at VCF 9.0! Here are some new developments of which
you might want to be aware...
Workshop Schedule Correction
The correct date for Vince Briel's Replica 1 SE Workshop is Saturday,
November 4 at 10:00am. The workshop was previously listed as being on
Sunday, November 5 on the workshop description page. We apologize if
the misleading time has caused you any inconvenience. The reason we
have the Replica 1 SE Workshop scheduled for Saturday at 10:00am is so
that workshop attendees can have their completed Replica 1 SE ready to
get signed by Woz after the Apple 30 Year Anniversary Celebration at
1:00pm on Saturday.
The following workshop slots are still available:
XGS Pico Edition Workshop - 5
COSMAC Elf 2000 Workshop - 6
Replica 1 SE Workhop - FULL
Don't delay, sign up today! Slots are filling fast!
http://www.vintage.org/2006/main/workshop.php
Vintage Computer Film Festival
This year we are launching the Vintage Computer Film Festival at the
VCF. The VCFF is a showcase of films with a vintage computing or
retro-technology theme. The screening schedule has been posted on the
VCF 9.0 website:
http://www.vintage.org/2006/main/film.php
The Vintage Computer Film Festival is available to all VCF attendees
as part of your regular admission.
Sponsored by Oddball Film+Video: http://www.oddballfilm.com
APL "1 CLEANSPACE" Anniversary Talk Added
The APL BUG (APL Bay Area User's Group) in conjunction with the VCF is
presenting a talk by Larry Breed on the origins of the programming
language APL. The talk has been scheduled for 3:00pm on Saturday,
November 4. APL BUG members wishing to attend only this session will
not be required to pay admission to the VCF, though they are welcome
to do so if they wish to enjoy the rest of the VCF festivities.
Check the session schedule for complete session times and information:
http://www.vintage.org/2006/main/session.php
!!! Prizes and Giveaways !!!
Processor Technology Sol-20
The Processor Technology Sol-20 "Terminal Computer", designed by
Silicon Valley legend Lee Felsenstein, was one of the earliest fully
integrated personal computers on the market, featuring the main
processor, RAM, ROM, keyboard, video interface, serial and parallel
ports, and cassette tape storage interface as standard features.
Stan Sieler of Allego Consultants, a regular exhibitor, exhibit judge
and VCF volunteer, has kindly donated a Sol-20 to give away at the
Sol-20 celebration at 1:00pm on Sunday, November 5. Check the session
schedule on the VCF 9.0 web pages for complete information.
Located in San Jose, California, Allegro Consultants specializes in
software, services, and consulting for clients with Hewlett-Packard
PA-RISC based computers, the HP 3000 and HP 9000.
http://www.allegro.com/
Briel Computers Replica 1 SE
The Replica 1 SE is a functional clone of the original Apple 1
designed by Steve Wozniak.
Vince Briel of Briel Computers has donated a Replica 1 SE to be given
away at the Apple 30 Year Anniversary Celebration at 1:00pm on
Saturday, November 4.
Briel Computers offers more build-it-yourself vintage computer replica
kits on their website:
http://www.brielcomputers.com/
Minds On Toys Digi-Comp 1 (v2.0) Mechanical Computer Kit
Tim Walker of Minds On Toys has created a build-it-yourself replica of
the classic Digi-Comp 1, a 3-bit mechanical binary computer. The
Digi-Comp 1 was originally sold in the 1960s and was made from cast
plastic. The updated version sold by Minds On Toys is constructed
>from sturdy paper stock.
Minds On Toys has donated a Digi-Comp 1 v2.0 to be given away at the
VCF. Visit Minds On Toys on the web at:
http://www.mindsontoys.com/kits.htm
You Can Still Be An Exhibitor!
Exhibit registration closes on November 1st. If you wanted to be an
exhibitor at this year's VCF, now is the time to register before it's
too late:
http://www.vintage.org/2006/main/exhibit.php
VOLUNTEERS NEEDED!
We are in need of several volunteers for Friday evening setup and
Sunday evening teardown. Setup on Friday begins at 8pm, and teardown
on Sunday begins as soon as the VCF ends. Even if you can provide
only fifteen minutes of your time, we can still use you. We've got a
lot of work to do in a very short period of time this year so any help
we can get would be greatly appreciated.
We also need an audio/visual specialist to manage the projectors and
recording equipment in the session chambers. This is a very important
role so we need someone with experience working data projectors and
MP3 players. We'll reward our gallant volunteer with free admission,
t-shirts, and other goodies.
To volunteer in any of these roles, please contact me directly (and
soon) at <sellam at vintage.org>. Thanks!
See You There!
Complete information about VCF 9.0, including the speaker schedule,
exhibit roster, end everything else can be found on the VCF 9.0 web
pages:
http://www.vintage.org/2006/main/
Best regards,
Sellam Ismail
Producer
Vintage Computer Festival
;)
--
Sellam Ismail Vintage Computer Festival
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
International Man of Intrigue and Danger http://www.vintage.org
[ Old computing resources for business || Buy/Sell/Trade Vintage Computers ]
[ and academia at www.VintageTech.com || at http://marketplace.vintage.org ]
I just picked up another full van load this weekend, docs, parts, boards,
> options, etc. The 11/35 can be delivered in the midwest, palletized, or
> shipped padded van. Please feel free to contact me off list.
Thanks, Paul Anderson
217-586-5361
On 10/30/06, Tony Duell <ard at p850ug1.demon.co.uk> wrote:
> And my PDP11/45 (2 6' racks, 2 free-standing RK07s, and what started out
> as a MINC contianing 2 RL01s, with the realtime I/O of the MINC linked to
> the PDP11/45 via a DW11-B Unibus-Qbus interface).
Niiiice. What I/O modules do you have, and are you using them for anything?
I have a MINC-11 (that's just a MINC), but only one or two lab
modules. I really can't do much with it in its present configuration
except use it as a rather ordinary RT-11 box. I've always wanted to
find some of the modules and do something "interesting" but I can't
imagine what that might be without a pile of boards staring me in the
face imploring me to find a use.
-ethan
> Al Kossow said:
>There are VERY VERY few people that have such systems. I only know of at
>most a dozen in the US, and most of them do not participate in on-line
>discussions. A few rarely use email.
....
>Surviving systems from before 1975 are very rare animals, esp mainframes,
>since so many of them have been scrapped for precious metals. Sadly, there
>is even less software that has survived. CHM didn't start seriously
>collecting documentation nor software prior to the move to the West Coast in
>the 90's. While they have an impressive collection of hardware, and a pretty
>decent collection of US computer documentation now, the software holdings
>pre 1975 are minimal.
>
>I will be giving a talk at VCF this Saturday on the CHM software collection.
>
Al, can you get someone to record your talk and put it on DVD or somewhere
that I can see it? As much as I would love to attend the VCF, I am on the
other side of the country and busy as hell right now with my job and other
things. I own a number of fully functional early-to-mid 1970s blinking light
PDP-11 systems and have an 11/40 set up with a replica of my college's
1977-79 era academic computer center, running a timesharing operating
system and software of the period, and complete with ASR-33, LA36, LA120,
VT52, and VT05 teminals, all fully functional. Other than the operating
system, much of the software came from an RK05 disk pack that I had
saved since 1978, and from printouts of every program on our system
in 1977-78. It has RK05, RL01, RL02, RX01, and RX02 drives.
I would very much like to see and hear your presentation. If it is recorded,
I would like to get a copy. Hopefully I can make it out to the west coast
next year.
Ashley Carder
Leesville, SC
" Al, can you get someone to record your talk and put it on DVD or somewhere
that I can see it?"
I don't know. Check with Sellam.
Since two people have asked now, what I'll be talking about will be
extracted from material I presented at the CHM's "Attic and Parlor" workshop
last spring, with a bunch of updates based on my last 6 months of work at
CHM, and on some things that we've added to the collection since then.
I'll try to get a paper version up somewhere (probably on bitsavers) after
the talk.
On 29 Oct, 2006, at 09:07, cctech-request at classiccmp.org wrote:
> Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2006 17:37:01 -0400
> From: "William Donzelli" <wdonzelli at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: Collections of (physically) large computers
>
>> OK, so how much floor space does his largest computer use?
>
> I am not sure, but from some pictures I have seen, he has a LOT of
> stuff for his two IBM 709s. And then there is the 7094 system. And the
> S/370 system. Each system may take up 500 square feet.
I am impressed, the very first computer I wrote a program for was a 7094
installed at Imperial College, London. Later on I got to see it and
they had
a disc drive hooked up to it. There was a story about a disk platter
shattering
and the computer room being blasted with shrapnel. I remember it being
unavailable for several months whilst they replaced every
electrolytic capacitor
in it. We got to use the CDC 6600 at the ULCC (University of London
Computer
Centre) whilst it was being repaired. We used the small Fortran compiler
PUFFT (Purdue University Fast Fortran Translator) on the 7094. The size
was certainly comparable with Flossie. Keeping one machine of this
size running
is a lot of work, the thought of keeping three running is daunting.
>
> For that matter, if I were to get all the stuff together for my
> Hitachi AS/6 (A Japanese 3032 clone), it would probably not fit in 500
> square feet either. The processor is 21 feet long by three feet wide,
> and does not contain any RAM or the channel I/O hardware. The six
> spindle 3330 DASD string is 15 feet long by 4 feet wide. Then the
> three tapes with controller is another 12 by 3 feet, then the card
> reader and punch take up two more three by six footprints, then the
> network box, then the 1403N printer, then the comm controller at five
> by four, then the other comm controller at 3 by 3, then some more junk
> I could hang off it if I wanted to. When you add this all up, then
> figure in the space needed to open the doors and gates for servicing -
> well, it is a large plot of land.
Yes with access space it adds up. So I'm not the only nutter!
> I think Sridhar is in the same boat. For that matter. that 4381 system
> that sold on Ebay six months or so back would also fits (and sinks) in
> that boat, having a couple good DASD strings.
Ok so you do know different. Why is there so little discussion of
these on
the list? Is there a more appropriate list? Maybe as we all have
different
manufacturer's kit we have little to talk about, but we still face
similar
problems, thing like tracking down media, repairing peripherals, fault
finding logic, keeping the machine clean and stopping them rusting,
keeping the offline support stuff working - keypunches, Flexowriters,
Teletypes etc, though maybe that is not a problem for you as your
machine has a comms controller.
>
>> Flossie has well over 4,000 printed circuit
>> boards and weighs about five tons.
>
> Pictures please!
I don't think I'm supposed to post pictures to the list and I don't
have a web site
so the best I can do is to refer you to a picture someone else has made
available. It is also very difficult to get a picture of all of
Flossie as it is so very
cramped in the barn.
Here is an old picture of a very similar machine to mine, except it
has four one
inch tape decks whereas Flossie has six half inch decks. Also Flossie
has paper
tape I/O and three drums instead of one in the machine pictured.
http://www.mikecurley-worked.netfirms.com/P3-2.jpg
>
> I am actually trying to buy a building so I can get all this junk
> in one place.
I am trying to extend my building so I can reassemble the second
machine which
will also give Flossie more space. No plans yet to get the second
machine
actually running, but maybe one day.
On 28 Oct, 2006, at 06:51, cctech-request at classiccmp.org wrote:
> From: "William Donzelli" <wdonzelli at gmail.com>
>
>> (Who has at home what might be a collection of the largest
>> computers in private ownership - unless you know different
>> as Esther Rantzen used to say on "That's Life").
>
> That is a dangerous claim to make.
But hopefully start an interesting discussion.
>
> Paul Pierce would be laughing.
>
> --
> Will
OK, so how much floor space does his largest computer use?
> From: "Evan Koblentz" <evan at snarc.net>
>
> If he meant physically largest,
Indeed.
> then I know a guy here in New Jersey who has
> a Burroughs mainframe which requires an 18-wheeler truck (or two)
> to move.
When I moved Flossie we used one articulated lorry (I did not count
the wheels)
and one rigid truck with a tail lift.
> And let's not forget Indiana's Jim Curry who has a vast collect of
> Cray
> supercomputers.
The pictures of Cray computers I've seen have no peripherals, just a
CPU, which is
smaller than the fixed part of Flossie. Much more powerful of course
than my Germanium
giant which is about the power of a 6502, though it is slightly
better handling big numbers.
The installation requirements say it needs 700 square feet, though I
have one squeezed into
500 square feet. The other (Arthur) is disassembled, some packed
around Flossie and some in
another part of the barn.
> I have an impressive collection of the * smallest * computers. :)
Very good, the list as a whole covers most machine types. I lost
interest in my mainframes for
a few years and moved onto a UK101 then I changed job and programmed
the Apple ][, //e,
///, Lisa then just about every Mac, and I'm writing this on an Intel
core duo Mac laptop.
>
> From: "Witchy" <witchy at binarydinosaurs.co.uk>
> On Fri, October 27, 2006 6:34 pm, Roger Holmes said:
>>
>> (Who has at home what might be a collection of the largest
>> computers in private ownership - unless you know different
>> as Esther Rantzen used to say on "That's Life").
>
> I used to think I did (in the UK), but that's only based on no web
> evidence found to prove otherwise :) I know there's far bigger
> collections
> than mine in Europe and the US.....
>
> --
> adrian/witchy
> Binary Dinosaurs creator/curator
> www.binarydinosaurs.co.uk - the UKs biggest home computer collection?
I do not have the largest number of computers, I am asking are the
computers at my home the
largest in a private collection? My machines are not even home
computers, they cost
247,000 pounds new, though I paid 200 pounds for one and 150 for the
slightly smaller one which
included loads of spare parts (almost another computer). They contain
almost no gold, just some
platinum in some relays (which are not part of the logic), hence the
scrap price being so low (they
cost much less than the cost of transporting them, not counting
dismantling which took a week and
reassembly which took several months back when I was in my twenties
and had more energy
and more spare time). Flossie has well over 4,000 printed circuit
boards and weighs about five tons.
She does not require air conditioning, though the seven Ampex TM4 mag
tape drives officially do need it.
She uses 13kVA three phase electricity. I showed some of the
documentation to a young chap recently
and he what he found surprising that the computer comes with a floor
plan in the installation instructions.
I did not show him the details of the floor loading, nor the
requirement for a separate one inch copper
braid wired back to the building's mains power inlet earth connection.
Roger Holmes.
While repairing a floppy drive with a shorted a bypass cap, I noticed
that the manufacturer had very thoughtfully inserted a picofuse in
the DC supply line. Predictably, it was the 10 ohm resistor in
series with the voltage regulator that turned to toast. The fuse is
none the worse for wear.
This brought to mind an old friend who earned her living as a field
engineer for DEC. At one point, she mentioned that resistor- and
transistor-protected fuses were a regular pattern for DEC equipment.
This would be back in the early 70's, BTW.
Did her observation reflect reality? Are there any other
manufacturers that routinely engaged in this practice?
Cheers,
Chuck
On 29 Oct, 2006, at 09:07, cctech-request at classiccmp.org wrote:
> Message: 25
> Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2006 00:48:52 +0100 (BST)
> From: "Witchy" <witchy at binarydinosaurs.co.uk>
> Subject: Re: ict1301.co.uk
> To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts"
> <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
> Message-ID: <1189.192.168.0.4.1162079332.squirrel at vorbis.demon.co.uk>
> Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
>
>
> On Sun, October 29, 2006 12:03 am, Al Kossow said:
>>
>>
>> http://ict1301.co.uk/13012006.htm
>>
>> A bit more up to date than the previous url
>
> Hm, I'm driving through Kent later on today, I wonder if I could
> call in
> and have a visit? :)
>
>
> --
> adrian/witchy
> Binary Dinosaurs creator/curator
> www.binarydinosaurs.co.uk - the UKs biggest home computer collection?
I wish I'd seen your e-mail yesterday, you would have been very
welcome to
come. Sorry. I'm about eight miles from M20 junction 9 (Ashford West).
If you come my way again, or anyone else on the list is in my neck of
the
woods and would like a look, could you e-mail me directly to save the
delay of
getting the digest, and try to give me a little advanced warning. I
do not
power Flossie up when the temperature is below about 13 degrees C
as Germanium transistors are only rated down to 10 C and they are all
now
very old. Getting new GET872 transistors is almost impossible and even
OA5 diodes are getting rare, the last I saw in the RadioSpares catalogue
were a pound ($1.60 approx) each, and the machine has them by the
thousand. Every word in the core store has two, so thats 4000 in each
machine even before even thinking about the logic. If it wasn't for
the price
dropping when the supply rises I could be close to being a millionaire
on the value of components alone!
By the way, the above URL does have pictures of Flossie but it is very
difficult to get a good picture at the moment - just not enough room
around
the machine. To access some parts is a major problem moving things
around
to make space so you can open the covers and get a scope and your body
close to the machine. By the way, the storage scope probably has more
processing power than the computer!
On Sat, 28 Oct 2006 Fred Cisin <cisin at xenosoft.com> Wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Oct 2006, Jim Isbell, W5JAI wrote:
> > My wife sais, "you havent used it in 5 years junk it." I agreed.
> My ex used to say that (except "SIX MONTHS"!)
> I handed her the fire extinguisher.
If you want to compete with someone who wants to dispose of your "Stuff" (there
is a George Carlin goodie about this), just go to the female clothes closet and
do a dated inventory. Those that are clothes conscious want to believe that
things eventually will come back in fashion. Typically it takes MORE than five
years (by my estimates). Then there are things that don't fit (NEVER respond
to "Do I look fat in this?", you will lose!).
Just about the only thing that goes obsolete as quickly as computers is high fashion.
--
Tom Watson
tsw at johana.com
____________________________________________________________________________________
Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail
(http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/mailbeta/)
Any interest in a Compaq SLT286 'laptop'? We've been offered one, but as we
have enough PC machines of this class I don't think there's any need for us to
have it.
The current owner's located in Chalfont St. Peter, although it sounds like he
may be prepared to deliver within a reasonable distance.
(A machine like this was my first exposure to the PC world - IDE disk, mono
VGA display, 10MHz CPU I think, floppy drive, detachable keyboard; it was a
pretty nice system I seem to recall)
cheers
Jules
--
If you've ever wondered how you get triangles from a cow
You need buttermilk and cheese, and an equilateral chainsaw
Winter is coming fast and the donor in GA will not hold on too much longer.
The museum still needs the help of about 145 people to donate $10 each to
save the computer collection in GA from going to the scraper. You can learn
more about the items we are trying save on our website
www.houstoncomputermuseum.org. We are a 501 (c) (3) nonprofit and can send
you a tax receipt for your donation. If you do not have $10 send us whatever
you can be it one dollar or two, heck we will take your $2 winning lottery
ticket. Thanks again to everyone that has helped us in the past in our
effort to save classic computers and related items. If you would like to
donate hardware, manuals, pictures, or whatever contact us. Thanks John
--- Tony Duell <ard at p850ug1.demon.co.uk> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > --- Tony Duell <ard at p850ug1.demon.co.uk> wrote:
> > > > The first one is what I have dubbed the "pow
er
> > > > towers" and they look like vertical batterie
s.
> > > > Usually come in groups of 5. Can anyone tell
> > > > me there name and/or what they do?
> > >
> > > Sound like electrolytic capacitors. They act a
s
> > > energy storage devices,
> >
> > ahhhh. I thought I felt a little electric charge
> > when I held my finger on the top of one for
> > a few seconds (power was off at the time,
> > but it had been on about 10 minutes earlier).
>
> You want to be careful here. A common tyoe of powe
r
> supply, called a
> switch-mode power supply starts out by rectifying
> (using diodes) and
> smoothing (using electrolytic capacitors) the main
s,
> producing about 350V
> DC. When the power supply is connected to the main
s,
> that voltage can
> easily kill you. Even when the machine is unplugge
d,
> the stored charge in
> those capacitors can be unpleasant, and may cause
> injury/damage.
>
> People who know mw know I have little time for daf
t
> safety rules, but I
> do treat the mains side of a switch-mode power
> supply with great respect.
>
> -tony
>
Yeah, after touching it the first time I thought
that that should be the last time. How would
you go about replacing them, if you needed to?
Would it be safe after a week of no power, or
would the risk of electricution be just as bad?
Regards,
Andrew B
aliensrcooluk at yahoo.co.uk
--- Tony Duell <ard at p850ug1.demon.co.uk> wrote:
> > The first one is what I have dubbed the "power
> > towers" and they look like vertical batteries.
> > Usually come in groups of 5. Can anyone tell
> > me there name and/or what they do?
>
> Sound like electrolytic capacitors. They act as
> energy storage devices,
ahhhh. I thought I felt a little electric charge
when I held my finger on the top of one for
a few seconds (power was off at the time,
but it had been on about 10 minutes earlier).
> to smooth out fluctuations in voltage (for example
> the output of a
> rectifier cricuit is pulsating DC, a capacitor wil
l
> smooth that out). An
> electrolytic capacitor has a high value of
> capacitance for its size, but
> it also has other characteristics (for esample, it
's
> 'polarised', one
> side must be positive wrt the other or the capacit
or
> will be damaged. And
> a eelatively high self-inductance) that make it le
ss
> suitable for some
> other applications.
>
> >
> > The second thing is the erm... plastic(?) "polo
>
> I owuld think that's actually ferrite (a magnetic
> material)
>
> > mint" that has what appears to be copper
> > wire wrapped around it. Can anyone give me
> > (or send me in the right direction to find)
> > any information on it.
>
> Sounds like a torroidal inductor. Used for filteri
ng
> DC power lines, as
> the energy storage device in switching regulators,
> etc.
>
> I recomend you read a book called 'The Art of
> Electronics' by Horrowitz
> and Hill. While it won't specifically answer these
> questions, it's a
> very good introduction to electronics. The only
> downside is that it's not
> cheap.
>
> -tony
>
Thanks for that Tony.
I have been making a list of books (and
recommended bookselling websites) that people
have mentioned on here. I'll try and track
some of them down soon ;)
Regards,
Andrew B
aliensrcooluk at yahoo.co.uk
On Sun, 29 Oct 2006 12:01:01 -0600 (CST), you wrote:
>Well, I had similar experience with a doctor that I consulted for, not
>about RS vs
>CPM, but just in general in that doctors will not take direction.
>They have been trained that they are Gods and therefore must make all
>their own decisions.
Just in general you're full of crap. It's nice to see that you
conclude that all 570,000 of us won't take direction from programmers
or anyone else, based on your large, well-designed trial with 1
physician.
Admittedly there are indeed some doctors who think that because they
can make life and death decisions that they are good at making other
decisions too. Unfortunately I must have missed the class where they
taught us how to be "Gods".
Incidentally that attitude is not, of course, limited to doctors.
Maybe some programmers think they're the only ones who know how to
write code that works, too.
Charles Morris, MD
WB3JOK
>
>Subject: Re: Collections of (physically) large computers
> From: Jules Richardson <julesrichardsonuk at yahoo.co.uk>
> Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2006 05:46:33 -0600
> To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
>The question of who has the smallest computer might be an interesting one.
>Whilst in later years the technology allowed machines to pack a lot more
>electronics into the case, the physical size didn't really decrease much - and
>in a lot of cases got bigger (quite often due to built-ins like disk drives
>that didn't *need* to be part of the main system).
>
>I suppose my Acorn System One is probably my smallest system - two Eurocards,
>about 100 x 160 x 30mm in size, complete with built-in keypad, display, tape,
>and expansion interfaces.
>
>My Sinclair ZX81 is probably next - but of course lacks a display so needs a
>TV in order to really be useful...
>
>cheers
>
>Jules
Embedded ELF with serial/RTC/disk(128mb CF), Video(80x24), GPIO (PS2keyboard
and 8255) in a stack filling a cube less than 5x5x4". Biggest comment is
there is NO surface mount parts. The 5" crt monitor is fully three times
the volume!!
Second to that is my Z80 minimax. Z80, 64k ram, 128k romdisk, 128k ramdisk
2 serial ports running CP/M. All CMOS and very low power use.
Both are way smaller than the PDP-11/73 with RL02, RX02 and 3 RD53in a 50"
rack.
Allison
>> I've been pondering the fact there is so little communications with the UK
>> old iron folks recently.
>
> By and large they're a quiet bunch :) I'm keeping tabs on quite a few big
> systems in private hands at the moment - they're out there and being looked
> after, but the owners aren't interested in the publicity.
--
The same appears to be true over here. I know of very few big iron
collectors here. I thought I'd here about more working at CHM, but if
they're out there, they don't have any contacts with the Museum either.
I keep hoping someone has some private stash of mainframe software, but it
hasn't surfaced yet.
It was interesting to talk to Doron while he was here about the relationship
between the Science Museum and CCS.
>
>Subject: RE: The Origins of DOS
> From: "Chandra Bajpai" <cbajpai at comcast.net>
> Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2006 11:10:20 -0400
> To: "'General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts'" <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
>
>
>How big was the TRS-80 Market to support all thoses DOSes?
In the first year of sales the total was over 250,000 units. I'd suspect
that by in year three (1981) there were at least 25-50,000 of those capable of
supporting a disk and possibly more.
The big three of disk based systems were:
CP/M (multiple platforms)
Apple (appledos)
TRS-80 (TRSDOS, Newdos, LDOS)
NS* Horizon (s100) NS*DOS (also cp/m)
Not in any order. There wer others but volumes were generally far lower.
>I remember when NewDOS/80 and I just remember it being fast. Any idea who
>wrote that?
That was the Apparat version if memory serves.
Allison
>-Chandra
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: cctalk-bounces at classiccmp.org [mailto:cctalk-bounces at classiccmp.org]
>On Behalf Of Fred Cisin
>Sent: Friday, October 27, 2006 10:24 PM
>To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
>Subject: Re: The Origins of DOS
>
>On Fri, 27 Oct 2006, Warren Wolfe wrote:
>> [TRS-DOS]
>> It was its own universe, Jim. The links and questionable parentage
>> of the original version of DOS are tied directly to CP/M, which was the
>> first O/S for personal computers that any significant number of
>> businesses embraced. And, Windows came out of the DOS world, and now
>> dominates as few products have dominated before. (Note: I am NOT
>> claiming this is a GOOD thing.)
>>
>> From what I can tell, TRSDOS was not a rip-off of anyone's software,
>> and nobody bothered to rip it off, so it's pretty much out of the world
>> of O/S scandal.
>
>There WERE several imitators of TRS-DOS (although still for TRS-80),
>including NEWDOS, DOSPLUS, and the semi-legitimate offspring LDOS.
>
>> It actually was pretty decent, and had a few ideas of
>> merit that didn't make it into the mainstream world for a while. It was
>> just totally tied to Radio Shack computing, and suffered a mortal wound
>> when IBM came out with their PC. No fault of its own.
>
>Rasio Shack AVOIDED expanding TRS-DOS into other semi-related hardware
>platforms.
>
>--
>Grumpy Ol' Fred cisin at xenosoft.com
I was just watching "Building the Ultimate" on the Science Channel. They
were explaining how truckers use high-tech communications systems. They
showed a portable terminal that drivers use inside the cab and .... it
looked quite similar to a Convergent Workslate!
Anyone else see that?
One of my H960's actually came to me with a fan already installed in the
top. I have a few loose fans, and my other H960 has no fan so I'm getting
ready to install one of those condor fans in my H960. I am wondering if the
H960 fans at the top are supposed to pull air in, or push air out? I'm more
interested in how DEC actually shipped them rather than "it'll work either
way".
I checked my H960 and it's set to pull air in from the outside downward into
the rack. Of course I have no way of knowing if that's how it originally
was, or if some collector/scrap person put it in backwards themselves.
Anyone set me straight on this? I suspect that's how it's supposed to be
given the channel on top for an air filter of some type.
Also, I'm working on the last H960 for my collection, and I have leftover
one of the antitip feet that stick out the front. If you're standing in
front of the front of the rack facing it - it's the right leg. Anyone wants
it - cost = shipping.
Jay West