A friend and business associate recently asked me about how I dealt with
corrosion issues in vintage computer restorations. After I created this
writeup for for him, I realized it may also prove helpful to someone on this
list. Here 'tis:
Very bad corrosion from alkaline battery spillage:
-------------------------------------------------
Pour 30% Hydrochloric Acid directly on the affected area of the board. When
the foaming (along with "clouds" of vapor) stop, immediately rinse the board
in plenty of cold water. Follow with a rinsing of distilled water (to
eliminate any calcium in the tap waster). Dry in the open air or with mild
air pressure (I use the later to speed drying).
When originally told of this process, I was skeptical (even though sourced
>from a professional in the board repair business). When I first tried it, I
was amazed at the quantity of foaming (and clouds of vapor) from the acid
treatment. But amazingly, just as he said, the acid is not on the board long
enough to dissolve traces, components, etc. It works, just as he said it
would!
You can get 30% Hydrochloric Acid at most hardware stores. Its "common name"
is "Muriatic Acid". (Wear latex gloves when handing and protective eye guards
- and use outdoors or in a well ventilated area).
Medium corrosion (from any source):
----------------------------------
Apply "DeoxIT D100L" sparingly to the affected area. Wait 20 minutes. Repeat
if necessary. When the corrosion is completely removed, remove any excess
"D100L". Apply "DeoxIT G100L" (formerly known as "ProGold") sparingly for
long term protection.
Light corrosion (from any source):
---------------------------------
Apply "DeoxIT GL100L" sparingly.
Notes:
-----
"DeoxIT GL100L" - The military (and certain manufacturers) uses this "stuff"
on edge connectors in sensitive system connectors to maintain excellent
contact and easy removal/insertion w/o stressing boards and connectors. I've
used it for years on the edge connectors of vintage computers (PDP-8, PDP-11,
etc.) - and it is truly an amazing product. Works like perfection.
The "DeoxIT" products seem expensive - but because you use the stuff
"sparingly", a very small bottle lasts a long time.
Cheers,
Lyle
--
Lyle Bickley
Bickley Consulting West Inc.
Mountain View, CA
http://bickleywest.com
"Black holes are where God is dividing by zero"
OS install media is likely to be a big problem for any potential
restore, and likely documentation too
--
One of the folks involved with HLH lives in the Bay Area. I've
been bugging him to donate the Orion material he has to CHM.
Over the break I finally got around to writing a simulator for the Microsystems
International Limited MOD-8 (Modular-8). It has been very educational and
interesting, and the final result of being able to experience what is like to run
a very early microprocessor (8008) based system from Canada has been
well worth it.
The simulator is available on my site in the MOD8 section (Under "Designed
in Canada") - I have also included an 8008 assembler, and my retyped source
code to the MOD-8's ROM monitor (Monitor-8).
This is the first step in getting my MOD-8 system up and running.
I have a complete chassis (MOD8-8), as well as unpopulated ROM (MOD8-4)
and RAM (MOD8-5) cards.
What I don't currently have is the CPU (MOD8-1), Restart/TTY I/O (MOD8-2)
and Control Buffer (MOD8-3) cards. If anyone can help locate these cards,
it would be greatly appreciated.
I do have several vectorboards which match the MOD-8 card format, and I will
eventually construct the boards that I am unable to locate, however I would like
to restore the system to as nearly original as possible.
I will also need to locate a few more 1702 EPROMs - I have 3-4 of them, but
the system needs a minimum of 7 for the ROM monitor. Programming them
will also be a challenge (even my trusty DIO 29B doesn't do 1702s and the
requirement for -40v as logic-low makes for a more complex construction
project than I would like considering I will probably never need it again) -
but the MOD8 has a built in 1702 programmer - Currently, I am planning to
make a ROM board with a 2716 on it once I have the rest of the system
completed, and use it to program 1702s for the original ROM board - an
interesting kind of hardware/software bootstrap.
The MOD8 was also known as the "GNC8" (Great Northern Computers),
and a later version used an 8080 processor (MOD80).
Any other MOD8/GNC8/MOD80 owners or interested parties out there?
-----
Other things posted to the site over the break:
- Updated my paper tape tools with PTE, a Paper Tape (reader)
Emulator - allows you to send the content of the paper tape images
over a serial or parallel interface as if from a physical reader.
- Updated the NST (North Star Transfer) utility in my Horizon package
to include a "Clean Head" function - easier than using N*DOS "RD"
command to sweep the head back and forth over a cleaning disk.
- Added disk images to the archive for:
NorthStar Advantage (thanks Joachim!)
Coleco Adam
Regards,
Dave
--
dave06a (at) Dave Dunfield
dunfield (dot) Firmware development services & tools: www.dunfield.com
com Collector of vintage computing equipment:
http://www.classiccmp.org/dunfield/index.html
Has anyone extracted images of the Read Only Storage
for the IBM 5100/5100 desktop computers? I haven't
seen any mention of it anywhere, nor any simulators.
Has anyone worked on this? Seems like it should be doable
and worthwhile. Though, it might be necessary to build
hardware to read out the ROS contents -- I don't think the
5100 provides programmatic access to the PALM object code for
the 360 and S/3 emulators, just the BASIC and APL code.
Does that sound right?
Brian
Generally still OT, but on-topic regarding the maintainability of
modern devices, did anyone perchance read the "A New Spin on White
Goods" article in the December 15, Electronic Design?
My clothes washer and dryer are going on 17 years and work just fine.
I see no reason that I won'd get 20-25 years of service out of them.
But reading about technology in the pipeline makes me wish they'd
last forever.
Motors controlled by DSPs with 10 A/D converters on chip, GUI
displays, talk about inventorying the stuff in your refrigerator
(using RFID tags on the food) really makes me wonder where the heck
repair parts are going to come from when the new appliances are 20
years old.
BTW, when I looked at replacement ovens over the last few days, I
found that just about all of the new ones are loaded with features
that I'll never use, such as "Sabbath Mode" (no kidding).
It looks like a brave new world, folks.
Cheers,
Chuck
I didn't say anything about being 'special' (although the answer is 'plenty'.) I will respond the same to such comments about ANY minority group. I choose fights with caution, but ignorance is the biggest problem facing the human species.
Jeff Walther wrote:
>> Last OS *my* 68000 Mac Plus has run is MacOS 7.1. MacTracker
>> claims 7.5.5, I can't dispute that as I haven't tried it but I expect
>> it might not do much good (no RAM left for applications). Same is
>> claimed for the Mac SE and Classic and PowerBook 100. MacTracker
>> doesn't report the Outbounds (Jeff?) but since (I think) they used
>> motherboards from the above systems,
>
> The Outbounds used motherboards designed and built by Outbound but
> with Apple ROMs installed which were scavenged from Apple Macs.
>
> I can't speak to the Notebook series but the Laptop (a much cooler
> machine, IMHO) will not run past Mac OS 7.0.1. However, this is a
> limitation in Outbound support.
Mac OS 7.5.5 runs on any Mac except the 128K, the 512K and any Mac released after 7.5.5 was current. I have run it on a 2 MB PowerBook 100, and found it performs surprisingly well. More RAM is recommended, though, I wouldn't have put up with it for daily use on a machine with less than 4 MB RAM.
However, I always felt that System 7.1 is a better choice for machines that support it than 7.5. After all, 7.5 is basically 7.1 with a bunch of shareware goodies thrown in.
,xtG
tsooJ
I'm not entirely sure if this is off topic yet(hence why I put it on
cctalk), but I know on a hobbyist level it's fairly rare.
On Saturday I'll be picking up an AS/400 model 9406-600 originally purchased
September 1997 with all the software and docs, licences etc that were ever
used with the machine, from the original owner. I've contacted IBM and
arranged license transfer (there was thankfully no charge)
Does anyone else here deal with AS/400, or have a lingering interest in it?
Secondly, I'm thinking of connecting a classic IBM terminal to it such as a
5251 S/34 term instead of the one that comes with it (something fairly
modern, not sure of the model yet) I am curious; are any limitations on what
I can connect, or are all twinax terminals pretty equal from a connectivity
standpoint?
I expect they use Scart as opposed to D type for the same reason they
use phono and not 75 Ohm BNC and XLR.
Its cheaper in mass produced consumer electronics.
Rod Smallwood
-----Original Message-----
From: cctech-bounces at classiccmp.org
[mailto:cctech-bounces at classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Jules Richardson
Sent: 03 January 2007 23:08
To: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
Subject: Re: D-shell connector age?
Adrian Graham wrote:
> On 3/1/07 21:33, "Jules Richardson" <julesrichardsonuk at yahoo.co.uk>
wrote:
>
>> Anyone know where D-shell connectors first appeared on equipment?
>>
>> Interesting thread going on in a local group at the moment about why
>> SCART [1] sockets are so horrible and nasty (prone to breaking pins,
>> difficult to line up, prone to falling out etc.) and why something
>> better, like a D-shell connector, wasn't chosen instead.
>
> SCART was originally known as PERITEL and originated in France.
>
> Make of that what you will :)
To be honest, it's a great idea - and much better than non-European
countries where the typical connectivity is via RF only.
Going source->modulator->tuner->display never did seem like a good idea
when you could just go source->display via separate shielded RGB
signals. (The picture quality I've seen on the typical US setup is
piss-poor compared to the UK, jokes about NTSC aside)
It's just a shame that the connector they picked for the standard is so
lousy.
Having looked at some old pricelists, SCART connectors weren't much
cheaper than D-shells - and given that they were typically used on
expensive equipment which only contained a couple of them, the
difference couldn't have been significant at all.
The only thing I can think of (other than it being some odd political
decision) is that you know SCART is SCART; if using D-shells there would
have been a few idiots trying to plug any old computer cable into their
equipment.
That hardly seems justification to enforce a nasty connector choice,
though.
Assuming that D-shell connectors were around, of course - but if Chuck's
right then they should have been readily available in the mid-70's. Pin
spacing is wider on SCART, so presumably they suffer less from
interference - but we all know that D-shells are perfectly good for
video (particularly at TV rates).
cheers
Jules
>
>Subject: back to the AGC, was Re: TTL 7400's Available
> From: Brent Hilpert <hilpert at cs.ubc.ca>
> Date: Tue, 02 Jan 2007 20:24:39 -0800
> To: General at priv-edtnaa05.telusplanet.net,
> "Discussion at priv-edtnaa05.telusplanet.net":On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
> <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
>
>Chuck Guzis wrote:
>>
>> I stumbled on this document:
>>
>> http://klabs.org/mapld04/papers/g/g233_alonso_p.doc
>>
>> while wondering about AC transformer-coupled logic and discovered
>> that the original idea for the Apollo guidance computer was to use AC-
>> coupled (core-transistor) logic.
>>
>> How's that for tying two threads together? :)
>
>Now that was a fun read. I'm still trying to understand his description of
>the core rope ROM though. I'm familiar with core-rope ROM (or at least one
>version of it) from attempting to make a reader to dump the contents of a Wang
>calc microcode ROM, but the AGC version sounds like the
>address-decoding/word-selection is done differently (..need a diagram).
cant help on core rope.
>And whats up with this mention of LCD displays? I didn't think there was
>anything practical available that early, or that was going to stand up to the
>rigours of space-flight - I have a calc with one of the first commercial LCDs
>(1972) and it's still kind of rudimentary - slow, poor contrast, temperature sensitive...
My memory of LCDs is they were way too late for the AGC and the basic
AGC design used either LEDs or Lamps in a 7 segment format.
>(And it confirmed that the AGC was constructed from a single gate/IC type.)
That statement I believe is in error. While the logic used was RTL and a
single family type the logic elements for that family by the mid 60s were
more diverse than just a two input NOR. My junkbox contains parts from
the era and includes JK-FF, three input nor, inverter buffers, and three
wide NOR parts. It is true that the 2input NOR is the fundamental RTL
logic building block there was nothing to limit it to 2,3 or 4 inputs
for the die size of the time other than the hermetic flat packs of
the day were typically 8/10/12 pins.
Examples of mid 60s RTL.
ul900 buffer inverter
uL914 dual two input nor
uL923 jk-ff
uL925 dual 2 input nor gate expander (914 withput collector resistor).
These were widely available and purchaseable by hobbists in 1967
at reasonable prices, typically under $2.00US. Most ham/electronics
magazines had DMM and frequency counter projects using these parts
by or during 1968.
History of transistor computers by that time frame had already proven
that a minimal set of logic blocks made general computer design easier.
The TX1 and TX2 could stand as foundation machines on that basis alone.
Those bocks were an inverter(buffer), NOR or NAND, and a register (FF).
Any more specialized parts were likely used for core or other very limited
use parts of a computer.
RTL is old, some of the peices I have are now reaching 40!
Allison
Zane H. Healy wrote:
Have you googled? That name sounds really familiar, are you sure they
aren't still doing Ada stuff?
Zane
------------------
Yes, there still do softwware. But in the late 80's, they made complete
systems, designing all their own hardware. That's what I'm trying to find.
Billy
Billy wrote:
And one that is driving me crazy, a company that supplied Ada systems to the
military. Was first based in Mt. View, then moved to San Jose into one of
the old Amdahl buildings. I can visualize the people and systems but can't
remember the name. Getting old sucks.
Of course as soon as I clicked send, the name came to me - Rational Systems.
Anybody remember them or have any of their systems?
Billy
At 04:38 PM 1/3/2007, you wrote:
>At this point, I would just use the cassette version, unless I needed the
>extra memory. I would be tempted to patch the ID text. I might change
>"VERSION" to "VER PT " and "VER CT ". It's not original, but could avoid
>confusion.
Is it not possible that the only difference between the paper tape and
cassette is the CSAVE and CLOAD commands? (as well as --KCACR-- in the
opening text) I think we need a memory image of unloaded paper tape and
unloaded cassette basic to compare. Hopefully it is "patched" in a way
that makes few differences. Or maybe the commands were just activated...
>Next, I would build a BASIC version timeline based on reading all issues of
>Computer Notes in chronological order. That would be a good time to make
>hardware timelines and copy info about software and hardware changes.
>
>Now you see why I collect the newest Altairs. I can assume I have the most
>powerful debugged MITS products. I wasn't in a hurry for the 680 because I
>always needed drives for development and business software. As a collector,
>I appreciate the weight and size and the opportunity to learn the M6800 at
>the bit and ASM level.
>
> >The KCACR doesn't seem very popular.
>
>I need a better timeline on the 680 and Pertec acquisition. After looking at
>some issues of Computer Notes, I see that the 680 was around for awhile.
>Pertec purchased a lot of problems when the bought MITS. They may have
>killed the 680 just as the KCACR was finished. The documentation was not
>updated and few people got new KCACR. Some 680 owners may be industrial and
>not interested in cassettes. Much of my stuff and a lot from eBay auctions
>came from Albuquerque after MITS closed. The component or product may not
>have reached many MITS customers.
>
>The KCACR is popular with me. I have two and a new reason to use the 680.
>I've avoided cassettes on the 8800. Now I have a smaller platform to use for
>learning. The 680 may lack software, but BASIC makes it easier write more.
>There are good books on the 6800 with small code examples. A 33K 680 with
>BASIC and switches with lights could keep someone busy for awhile.
>
> >What could we do to determine if the basics are the same? This would tell
>us the math function similarity...
>
>I think that is too much detail for now. I'd just use the newest version
>that would fit in memory with my application.
So far I only have two software applications for the 680. Even if they are
the same except for two commands. ; )
> >I could run the forensics on the Altair32 emulator and on both versions of
> >the 680 basic. If it matches up with any of the 8080 basics then we've
> >found the "version" of 8080 basic used as a starting point.
>
>Interesting idea. I'd start with Reading Computer Notes.
It would only prove anything if all the 8800 basics have different finger
prints. The disk basics could have the same fingerprint and we wouldn't
care about that, I think. This doesn't rule out bug fixes in all non math
areas...
>I hope you find someone with additional software. Did you find a KCACR
>manual? I don't have one and haven't checked Steve's list. I will look at
>pricelists and see what is listed for the 680.
I'm sure I will. Steve has the manuals. I'm making a big list for him. : )
Grant
Yes, there still do softwware. But in the late 80's, they made complete
systems, designing all their own hardware. That's what I'm trying to find.
--
CHM just got a system w/o docs a month or so ago
Did you mean Arete? We have one, and it ran a version of Unix called Arix.
> This is a university town and,
> so G3's aren't hard to come by cheap if the urge should ever hit me
> again.
Beige G3's are OK, and still have SCSI and serial ports. I have a gaggle
of G3 powerbooks that I use at CHM for various recovery projects. Blue
and White machines switched to USB and dumped SCSI and serial, which
make them less interesting. If you want that sort of machine, get 2nd
generation or later Grey G4. Avoid the last couple of generations of
G4's, they had cooling problems...
Putting a 1+GHz CPU upgrade into the earlier G4s makes a pretty decent
system. I'm using one as my main machine at CHM.
> I'd probably have to BUY an AAUI-to-RJ45 ethernet adapter
Probably not worth messing with. You aren't going to be happy with the
performance of a first generation PowerMac.
If you really want a shell in the OS 9 environment, there's MPW.
I remember someone playing with getting a bare-metal OS going on PPC
Macs at one point with a CLI. Don't know how far they got.
This is sort of interesting if you wanted to do some low level turn the
interrupts off kind of programming on the machine, since you can't
actually turn interrupts off completely in the OS 9 environment.
This is directed mainly to ClassicCmp folk in or near the Puget Sound region.
While at Boeing Surplus this afternoon, I noticed that there were having what amounts to a 'Blowout Sale' on SGI Indigo and Octane workstations. These systems are, as far as I know from talking to their computer guy, complete except for the hard drive (although the Sun Ultra 10 I bought still had the drive in it, admittedly blanked).
Here's the best part: The price -- $1.00 Each. No, that's not a typo. One measley dollar for an SGI Octane, Indigo, or a Sun Ultra 10.
Now the bad news -- Their computer guy tells me that they need to clear shelf space for a bunch of incoming Dell systems. If said Dells happen to come in tomorrow (Thursday, Jan. 4th), all the Octanes, Indigos, and other non-PC's will ALL be THROWN OUT.
So -- If you want to take a crack at getting an ultra-cheap system, I would strongly recommend stopping at Boeing Surplus on Thursday. They're at 20651 84th Ave. S, Kent, WA 98032, open from 11:00 - 17:00 PST.
I landed an Ultra-10 myself. Happy scrounging.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Bruce Lane, Owner & Head Hardware Heavy,
Blue Feather Technologies -- http://www.bluefeathertech.com
kyrrin (at) bluefeathertech do/t c=o=m
"If Salvador Dali had owned a computer, would it have been equipped with surreal ports?"
At 15:24 -0600 1/3/07, Zane wrote:
>Consider this, it's been nearly 10 years since a Mac containing a 68000 CPU
>was even able to run the current version of the operating system. I forget
>if support was dropped with System 7.6, or Mac OS 8.0.
>
> Zane
To elaborate on what Cameron said:
Last OS *my* 68000 Mac Plus has run is MacOS 7.1. MacTracker
claims 7.5.5, I can't dispute that as I haven't tried it but I expect
it might not do much good (no RAM left for applications). Same is
claimed for the Mac SE and Classic and PowerBook 100. MacTracker
doesn't report the Outbounds (Jeff?) but since (I think) they used
motherboards from the above systems, I would be surprised if they ran
later versions. I'm not aware of any later 68000 Macs (or indeed, any
others excepting the 128k/512k/fat Mac series, none of which went to
OS 7.x).
If the question was whether 680x0 processors support OS 8,
the answer to that should be yes. Quadra 950 is claimed to run MacOS
8.1, as is PowerBook 540/c and others, again per MacTracker (which is
a reasonably useful resource for these machines).
The Mac OS category in the same program says the same thing,
giving requirements as follows:
7.1 68000 or later, 2 MB RAM, 4 MB hard drive
7.5 68000 or later, 4 MB RAM, 21 MB hard drive
7.6 32-bit clean 68030 or later, 8 MB RAM, 40-120 MB hard drive
8.0/1 68040 or later, 12 MB RAM, 195 MB hard drive
8.5 PPC, 16 MB RAM, 150-250 MB hard drive
8.6 PPC, 24 MB RAM, 190-250 MB hard drive
Wow. Looking back, it's amazing how fast requirements shot
up. I'm really glad I sort of sat out that period as far as buying
computers. Our main home system was a Mac Plus until we leapfrogged
to a Powerbook 3400 (which is still our current system). Nice to go
>from on-topic to brand-new machines - gives us a while to save up our
computer-buying budget.
FWIW, hit http://www.mactracker.ca/ if you want to grab the
(freeware) program I'm looking at. Gotta love these guys, there's a
version which runs on MacOS 8.5 still available, as well as one for
(spit) Windows and (grin) *iPod*. Not affiliated.
--
Mark Tapley, Dwarf Engineer
(I haven't cleared my neighborhood)
210-379-4635 Dwarf Phone, 210-522-6025 Office Phone
In the mid-80's when I first moved to Silicon Valley, I worked for Fujitsu
Computer Products. I (and my support engineers) went around the Valley to
various companies installing Hard Drives.
Recently, I've been trying to write up some of those experiences and found
that I have almost nothing on a lot of the companies. And I see that
bitsavers doesn't have much either. Does anybody remember or know anything
about:
Daisy Systems - Design Automation stuff
Arix or later, Arete - Unix systems for government sites
Pixel - Unix systems
California Computer Corporation - Training systems
General Computer - 16 and 32 bit CPUs
System Industries - Controller PCBs DEC compatible
Intertest - Design Automation
And one that is driving me crazy, a company that supplied Ada systems to the
military. Was first based in Mt. View, then moved to San Jose into one of
the old Amdahl buildings. I can visualize the people and systems but can't
remember the name. Getting old sucks.
I'd love to hear about anyone's experience with any of these companies and
especially if any documents or hardware survived. And I'm especially
interested in ARIX. It was a very unusual company, and obliquely mentioned
in the 6 part TV series on Silicon Valley.
Billy
> Eric J Korpela wrote:
>> Even though it may be a collectible, it's not quite vintage. Yet.
>> Things branded "Sun 4," I think would count, as would various
>> SPARCstations and Solbournes. Has any 64-bit microprocessor been
>> declared officially vintage yet?
>
> I already mentioned the Alpha 21064, but I believe the MIPS R4000 was
> even earlier.
>
> Peace... Sridhar
Well, we're talking three things: processor architectures, processors,
and systems.
The 21064 is definitely on-topic, as are the early AXP systems (DEC
3000/4000/7000)
The basic Alpha architecture is probably irrelevant, because I have
never heard a discussion about architectures as being on or off topic,
generally discussions of that nature are sufficiently technical to
pass.
The R4000 is an interesting case, because the chip predates the 21064,
but (a) early versions could not run 64-bit since they had a bug in the
MIPS-III instructions and (b) no R4000/R4400 systems were 64-bit
capable until the Onyx in 1993 unless I've missed something. In short,
therefore, the 64-bit potential of the R4000 arrived first, but 21064
realized a 64-bit system first. Take that how you will.
Well- Sun4u is still in production, and it doesn't have any "first"
cachets like the Ultra1, E10k, etc. so I sort of see where Jay's going.
Older Sun4 machines (4m 4d 4c -4) would probably be ontopic, though.
SGI 4Ds (loosest definition, all MIPS based machines rather than the
strict definition of from the 4D/60 to the introduction of ARCS PROMs)
are probably fair game now, given that the line has been discontinued
effective Dec 31.
Newish Alphas and HP-9000s are probably a bit shady, though, since
they're still in (semi) production, but not pushed, so they could be
on.
This is a discussion started off list.
>Startrek might port to 680 BASIC.
It runs the 8080 Tic Tac Toe program. I haven't tried loading star trek
yet. It might just work out of the box. I'll find out tonight.
More responses below...
>There are a couple of issues that I am not too sure about.
>
>The 680 BASIC VERSION 1.1 REV 3.2 lable uses VERSION and REVISION. I used
>mostly 300-5-C. The C and F revisions of Version 5 BASIC are the only 300
>series that work. There is a Version 5.0 that I don't remember much about. I
>started with BASIC 4.1 and always thought it was the first "good" version. I
>assumed all earlier versions were buggy and missing features.
>
>At first, I thought 680 BASIC VERSION 1.1 REV 3.2 was similar to 8080 BASIC
>3.2. Now I don't know because I'm not used to working with Revision numbers.
>The 300 series uses Revision letters. At this point, I don't know how the
>680 and 8080 BASIC versions compare. The 680 BASIC VERSION 1.1 REV 3.2
>language and interpreter have at least one feature introduced in 8080 BASIC
>4.0.
>
>The term "regular BASIC" is ambigous. There are several versions of BASIC.
>Which ones are "regular"? The term BASIC can refer to the language or the
>interpreter. When someone refers to 8K BASIC, the size is obvious and a set
>of language features is assumed. Disk Extended BASIC adds language features,
>bug fixes, and major internal changes. Do all 8K BASICS support the same
>languages and syntax.
>
>The term "patches" could be accurate, but I'm more comfortable with version
>and revision. The label MITS ALTAIR 680 BASIC VERSION 1.1 REV 3.2 may be a
>port of 8K BASIC. What version and revision of 8K BASIC? The examples below
>show the same lable on two two sizes of interpreter. MITS should have
>changed the lables.
>
>I don't know which 680 BASIC VERSION 1.1 REV 3.2 came first. Do they both
>translate the same exact language? The obvious guess would be that the paper
>tape interpreter has the CSAVE command removed or disabled. It could also be
>that the smaller BASIC supports the older CSAVE syntax. It could also be
>that the bigger version has changes and someone forgot to bump the revision
>number.
I think non KCACR came first. The KCACR doesn't seem very popular. Its
not even in a lot of the -system- documentation. What could we do to
determine if the basics are the same? This would tell us the math function
similarity...
http://www.rskey.org/~mwsebastian/miscprj/forensics.htm
I could run the forensics on the Altair32 emulator and on both versions of
the 680 basic. If it matches up with any of the 8080 basics then we've
found the "version" of 8080 basic used as a starting point.
>Does CSAVE work if you load the paper tape version into a machine with a
>cassette interface?
Nope. Not with any of the syntax changes either.
Grant
I do all of my large shipping with them too, and have been totally
satisfied with their service. I agree with everything that Guy has
said. I have used them many times during the past 3 years to ship
*LOTS* of large equipment, PDP-11 blinkinglight systems in racks,
fragile 35 year old terminals on pedestals, etc. They have always
delivered oir picked up on time and it was a painless process just as
Guy described. I was a little nervous with my first shipment, but they
have proven time and time again that they will get my stuff moved
in a safe and timely manner. Last week I they delivered two large
racks of 35 year old PDP-11 systems and drives, a DecWriter,
and a card reader to my place. They gave me a delivery date with
a 3 hour window of delivery, and the delivery truck came right in
the middle of the delivery window. Smooth and painless.
Ashley
-----Original Message-----
>From: Guy Sotomayor <ggs at shiresoft.com>
>Sent: Jan 2, 2007 4:51 PM
>To: General at shiresoft.com, Discussion at shiresoft.com@null, On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts <cctalk at classiccmp.org>, null at null
>Subject: Re: Shipping company moveit.com
>
>I do *all* of my large shipping through them (unless I do it myself). I
>have been *extremely* happy with them and I've been using them for a
>number of years now. One of the things I like about them is that they
>are pretty much "fire and forget". I don't have to hand hold them to
>get stuff done and they do a good job of getting stuff moved with no
>breakage. I do however give them *all* of the information at the start
>of the transaction.
>
>Of course, I've done enough business with them that they call me up
>occasionally to see if I have anything that needs to be shipped.
>
>Richard wrote:
>> I'm using them for a dovebid sale and while things are scheduled to be
>> delivered tomorrow (knock on wood), so far I've been pretty
>> unimpressed with moveit.com. They haven't been very good at
>> communicating important details like MY SHIPPING ADDRESS, when the
>> shipment would be made, how payment was to take place, etc.
>>
>> They say they do a love of business through dovebid, and while that
>> may be so, I don't think I would use them again in the future compared
>> to my experiences with cratersandfreighters.com.
>>
>> Has anyone else used these guys?
>>
>> What was your experience?
>>
>
>--
>
>TTFN - Guy
>
>
--- Grant Stockly <grant at stockly.com> wrote:
>
> I think the reason that the demodulated output is
> not 300bps is the KCACR
> is locking onto the tape speed?
I don't know anything about the KCACR, but
the way the Spectrum and C64 saved data
the computer would go by the speed of the
tape.
Typically, any data would be preceeded by
4 (perhaps less?) seconds of pulses which
would allow the computer to work out the
speed of the tape. I can only assume other
computers used this method too??
Regards,
Andrew D. Burton
aliensrcooluk at yahoo.co.uk
> Has anyone extracted images of the Read Only Storage
> for the IBM 5100/5100 desktop computers?
Eric has talked about doing it. Apparently it is scanned during
initial self-test, so it could be captured with a deep logic analyzer
Considering how many have failed, it's something that needs doing.
--- Chuck Guzis <cclist at sydex.com> wrote:
**>> snip <<**
>
> And here's their web site--they seem to be very
> games-oriented
> nowadays:
>
> http://www.enterbrain.co.jp/login/
>
> Enjoy,
> Chuck
>
LOL.
Just a bit!
Enterbrain own the largest Japanese (and
Worldwide??) brand of videogames magazines,
including:
Arcadia (arcade mag)
Famitsu PS2 (errr....!!)
Famitsu XBox (erm!)
Famitsu Wii (that may not be out yet!)
Famitsu Weekly (weekly multi-format console mag)
Famitsu Wave DVD/Mag
I get the last one. It comes out every month
and has 2 DVD's packed with adverts, tips,
wacky Japanese stuff (well.. most games
mags/TV shows are nutty - anyone here in the
UK recall Bits or Games Master?), reviews
and interviews. Theres usually around 3 hours
of stuff.
Going well OT, sorry Jay.
Regards,
Andrew D. Burton
aliensrcooluk at yahoo.co.uk
--- Joachim Thiemann <joachim.thiemann at gmail.com> w
rote:
**>> snip <<**
> (*) This may be due to the fact that I mostly used
> Trackers before
> leaping into MIDI. OctaMED is a heck of a great
> program, and a good
> enough reason to keep my Amiga up and running.
>
OctaMED :)
I tried various pieces of music software on
the Amiga including Music Mouse (great idea,
but you need Deluxe Music Construction Set
to save the music! - I have it now too, BTW),
Tracker and a few others.
Teijo Kinnunens OctaMED was by far the
easiest to use, for me atleast. I have only
composed 2 songs so far (using the score
sheet window - I have the tracker style code
mode, despite being the only way to add
special effects).
The first was rubbish (seriously), but the 2nd
was very good and only took 2 hours to
compose. It only last's 1 min 30 secs and is
"played" on the Bamboo Zylaphone. I called
it "Jungle Beat".
Teijo's 2 demo pieces of music that
acompanied OctaMED 5 (the version I use)
were awesome. Is he still in the music scene
somewhere?
OctaMED became OctaMED Sound Studio
(which I have the demo of somewhere) but
I wasn't keen on it.
Regards,
Andrew D. Burton
aliensrcooluk at yahoo.co.uk
--- David Griffith <dgriffi at cs.csubak.edu> wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Jan 2007, Zane H. Healy wrote:
>
> > > > number of times system has inflicted
> injuries on the owner
> > >
> > > That seems reasonable - I'm sure we all agree
> every QBUS enclosure
> > > ever produced is on topic :-) :-)
> >
> > I don't believe I've ever been injured by a Q-Bu
s
> enclosure. You just need
> > to be careful! :^) I can't remember loosing any
> skin, even on a BA23.
> > Granted most of the time I've used a BA123.
>
> I've never used such a thing, but I have gashed my
> hand on the corner of a
> disused one.
>
Never heard of one myself(!), however I
have come close to cutting myself when
putting a 1MB RAM expansion card into the
trapdoor on my Amiga 600 (giving it a
whopping 2MB total chip RAM) - I just got
a few grazes (spelling?).
Regards,
Andrew D. Burton
aliensrcooluk at yahoo.co.uk
--- Jules Richardson <julesrichardsonuk at yahoo.co.uk
> wrote:
>
> Anyone know where D-shell connectors first appeare
d
> on equipment?
>
> Interesting thread going on in a local group at th
e
> moment about why SCART [1]
> sockets are so horrible and nasty (prone to breaki
ng
> pins, difficult to line
> up, prone to falling out etc.) and why something
> better, like a D-shell
> connector, wasn't chosen instead.
>
Yeah, the cable seems to put weight on the
SCART socket and caused a glitchy SCART
socket (or cable?) so we had to stick a thin
piece of card in to get it to work!!
I use a 3-way SCART box myself now, no
more connecting/deconnecting to damage
those pins, or the sockets on the TV/DVD/VCR.
> Thing is, SCART was apparently first used in
> consumer A/V equipment in 1977,
> which probably means it was thought up in the
> mid-70's.
Really?
I never realised SCART was so old, I thought
it was a modern thing. Or was it just
re-introduced by TV manufacturers?
Regards,
Andrew D. Burton
aliensrcooluk at yahoo.co.uk
On 1/3/07, Bob Brown <bbrown at harpercollege.edu> wrote:
> I've long had an interest in AS400. Any leads on other systems being
> available in the Chicago area?
It's not Chicago, but I'm in Columbus (6-7 hrs away) and probably
won't do much with the smallish AS/400 I have once I get it to power
up (still missing the twinax cable to the console terminal). I'd post
model and specs, but it's not where I am at the moment.
-ethan
On 1/3/07, Cameron Kaiser <spectre at floodgap.com> wrote:
> > > I just what to know if the MAC is vintage if contains a 68000?
> >
> > Consider this, it's been nearly 10 years since a Mac containing a 68000 CPU
> > was even able to run the current version of the operating system. I forget
> > if support was dropped with System 7.6, or Mac OS 8.0.
>
> 8.5. 8.0 dropped the '030 and prior, but an '040 could still run 8.0 and 8.1
> officially, and an '030 could run them with some hacking.
Was that due to instruction set differences? Stack frame differences?
MMU differences?
-ethan
Chuck Guzis wrote:
>I'm beginning to wonder if it's time I upgraded my home network. The
>NICs on most of the machines are 100BaseT, with the odd old machine
>sporting a 10BaseT. But it's the hubs I wonder about--two old
>National Semi 6-port Datamover 10BaseT units coupled together with a
>10Base2 (coax) link. It's that coax that I dread replacing--it goes
>between floors and snaking it through the walls was a real chore.
>My DSL speed is 1.6Mbps, so I'm thinking that there's little reason
>to upgrade the setup. Am I thinking correctly or am I likely to see
>an improvement in internet access speed if I upgrade?
My home network is rather different. My "data center" is out in the
shop. The network out in the shop is centered on a 1GB/Sec. Ethernet
switch, with all of the infrastructure servers hooked up to it. There's
also an earlier 10/100 switch, which supports a couple of older machines
that don't really need GigE (dedicated SETI at Home machines). My DSL
connection is 1.5Mb/Sec., and I use a nice router/firewall with a
separate seconday firewall creating a DMZ between the main home network
and the Internet. The secondary firewall connects into the GigE fabric.
There's an 802.11G (108Mb/Sec. link speed) wireless access point in the
shop for wireless use when I'm out there. The shop is also completely
wired with Cat6 cable to many drops. I have two GigE Cat6 lines, one
active, one as a spare) that run in conduit underground between the shop
and the house. In the house, there's a GigE switch, a 10/100 switch for
older machines, an 802.11G wireless access point. The wireless stuff
all uses WPA for improved security, although out there where I live, the
chances of "snoops" is pretty small. The wireless access point are
long-range devices...I can actually connect to the WAP in the house from
anywhere within about 100 yards of the house. The house is all wired
with Cat6 cable also, with lots of drops.
All of these upgrades (previously, everything was 10/100), have made a
dramatic improvement with regard to 'response' of end-user machines.
The GigE interconnect between the servers and the end-user machines. As
far as Internet connectivity goes...in networks, as in racecars, the
weakest part is the limiting factor. The T1-equivalent DSL connection
is SO much slower than any of the rest of the network, that upgrading
everything to GigE made absolutely no detectable difference in terms of
speed of access to the Internet.
So, if your main concern is Internet connectivity, leave your network
as-is.
Spending the money to upgrade really won't make any substantial
difference there. If you have any time of server-based infrastructure
(file server, media server, Email server, etc.) then upgrading the
"core" network can make a big difference in terms of response to core
network services.
If you want your Internet to be faster, spend the money to try to get a
faster connection (if possible). With DSL, the limiting factor on speed
is the distance from your home to the closest DSLAM, and the equipment
used by your ISP.
Rick Bensene
Back in the early 90s, I rescued some equipment from work that was
being discarded. This is where I got my ESV/50 and my ARS (Advanced
Rendering System) and other E&S bits. At some later time, a former
E&S coworker really wanted a board out of the ARS as a keepsake
because he worked on it. Since I had not powered up/connected my ARS
to my ESV even once and I wasn't yet totally smitten by the
"collecting bug", I sent him the board. Since then I have regretted
that a little bit because this board wasn't optional in the ARS, there
is only one of these boards as it houses the main processor array.
However, I also rescued some equipment that I gave to another former
E&S coworker. As time went by, he decided that he wanted to get rid
of his equipment and asked me if I wanted it. Since E&S equipment is
as rare as hen's teeth, I immediately said yes. Well, we went over
after Christmas on a sunny Saturday afternoon and picked up the gear.
He had an ESV/10 Workstation (a smaller version of my ESV/50), a
Freedom 3000 accelerator and an ARS!
Now the ARS is probably the biggest baddest piece of iron that the
Workstation Division of Evans & Sutherland ever produced. Its a
fairly large box, about the size of a deskside SGI Onyx if you're
familiar with that. Except its not a whole computer, its just a
peripheral! Its whole purpose is to render photorealistic images at
full screen resolution in just a few seconds. It has hardware
antialiasing, hardware texture mapping, environment mapping and
reflection mapping. In the late 80s/early 90s this was pretty hot
shit although now you can get it on a cheapo $100 graphics card for
your PC. (To many of you, this will be a familiar refrain!)
Now that I have a 2nd ARS, I can get one back in working condition.
Its a rather unique beasty, considering that only one piece of
software (CDRS, the "Conceptual Design and Rendering System") ever
supported the ARS. The primary customers of CDRS were car companies
doing auto body design. Therefore you had to do high quality
renderings that showed how the reflections and gloss would look on the
painted car body in order to satisfy the customer. Customers for CDRS
were a "who's who" of the car industry at the time: Ford, Chrysler,
Daimler-Benz, Harley-Davidson, Renault and I'm sure some others I'm
forgetting.
If I get the ARS back in working order, then its quite possible that I
will have the only working ARS on the planet, unless there are still
some kicking around the automotive companies.
--
"The Direct3D Graphics Pipeline" -- DirectX 9 draft available for download
<http://www.xmission.com/~legalize/book/download/index.html>
Legalize Adulthood! <http://blogs.xmission.com/legalize/>
Sort of off-topic(-ish) but I'm looking for some midi sequencing
software to run on my Powerbook 180. Actually, since they came out in
about '92 I think they might well be on-topic. Most of the synths I
want to connect are older than that.
Anybody got any thoughts on this? I tried Midigraphy but couldn't
really get my head around it.
Gordon.
I'm not entirely sure if this is off topic yet(hence why I put it on
cctalk), but I know on a hobbyist level it's fairly rare.
On Saturday I'll be picking up an AS/400 model 9406-600 originally
purchased September 1997 with all the software and docs, licences etc
that were ever used with the machine, from the original owner. I've
contacted IBM and arranged license transfer (there was thankfully no
charge)
Does anyone else here deal with AS/400, or have a lingering interest in
it?
Secondly, I'm thinking of connecting a classic IBM terminal to it such
as a 5251 S/34 term instead of the one that comes with it (something
fairly modern, not sure of the model yet) I am curious; are any
limitations on what I can connect, or are all twinax terminals pretty
equal from a connectivity standpoint?
Hi Grant,
>One 8bit ASCII and another forced to 7bit. This one attached has
>been forced to 7bit ASCII. Both files WILL load into the Altair without
>issue.
The tapes are comprised of recorded ascii data (s-record format) ...so if
you are just reading the data as is (vs. loading the data via a s-record
loader) then you should probably get the same thing regardless if you
use 7 or 8 bits.
>It seems random which bytes had the 8th bit set and which
>didn't.
I assume that you are referring to the data in memory as a result of the
ROM tape loader execution? If so, you will note that Basic has bit 8 set
on many ascii text elements within the source. Microsoft Basic used the
high bit set in the keyword tables for the code that searched the keyword
tables. They also often used the high bit to determine the last character
of message strings.
> Also, there is what appears to be garbage after the S0 record. I
>have no idea why. The tape has a bunch of 7Fs, then S0 and a bunch of
>garbage, and then 00s. At the end there is some garbage too. The KCACR
>ROM appears to ignore it.
It appears that the tape is similar to the MITS Absolute Tape Load format.
I'm guessing that your format is as follows:
First ...
Pre-leader - comprised of a series of bytes that represent the length of
the tape checksum loader. For example, a series of 7F bytes would
mean that the checksum loader is 127 bytes long.
Second...
S-record header record (S0)
Third...
Checksum loader - intended for those who do not have the kacr ROM. It
should be 127 bytes in in your example.
Forth...
Tape leader - a series of nulls
Forth...
The actual code. There may be some garbage bytes appended, depending
on how MITS dumped the tape (specifically, how long the address range
specified to dump was).
Fifth...
Trailer - a series of nulls
This is similar to the typical format used for MITS tapes (both paper
and cassette based).
Scott
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
Posted for comment, started off list:
I have about 3-4 recordings of the tape. As well as a "reproduction" of
the tape.
I lifted the "transmit" leg on the serial chip so that it wasn't in the
socket. Then I put a jumper from the receive pin to the transmit
hole. While playing the tape into the Altair I recorded the remodulated
data into the computer and made a note if there were no checksum
errors. As the tape was being demodulated the KCACR was remodulating the
data at the same time.
I have never been able to get a computer recorded file to load into the
Altair. This may be caused from a lack of audio amplitude? I was
surprised that the KCS.EXE utility only found 3 errors in the cassette tape
wav file but found 11,000 errors with the remodulated WAV file. There was
a slight DC offset and a background hum (not 60hz)
I'm STILL trying to figure out why I have a few 13 minute long and a few 10
minute long recordings of the SAME TAPE!!!!
Once I am through with this process I will make a tutorial. I'll also
offer to recover other people's tapes. I LOVE time capsules! : )
Grant
>If you haven't done so already, back up your tapes to .wav files right
>away!
>
>Just plug your cassette player into your PC and do some high quality
>mono recordings (8bits @ 22050 samples/sec). Avoid MP3 because of lossy
>compression.
>
>Look here: http://www.netbay.com.au/~dxforth/ if you want to
>post-process the .wav files, but it's even easier to just feed the audio
>back and forth via your sound card.
>
>Once you have the digital data, you can always recreate the tapes but if
>you lose the tapes, that's it.
>
>Jack
Happy New Year!
I'm back at it again - I plan on doing better this time. (I've fixed
the specific double delete bug that bit me last time, improved tracing
quite a bit, and added a lot of consistency checking code.)
Just like last time, all you need to do is telnet to 24.159.203.149,
port 2301. Once again, that's my Linux box, but today it is forwarding
port 2301 to my PCjr. The commands are slightly enhanced from the last
test, but it isn't anything highly interactive.
Up to 9 people can connect simultaneously. We didn't get more than 2 or
3 simultaneous connections last time, so I'm probably overly optimistic.
Some of you noted from last time that there is no character echoing or
line editing. Telnet users on Unix machines will probably have local
line editing, which makes things a wee bit nicer. The standard Windows
telnet client doesn't do that by default, so you will type but not see
your characters. That's a project for a different day.
Here is a picture of the machine you are connecting to, complete with
the Western Digital 8003 Ethernet card grafted onto the side:
http://brutman.com/PCjr_WD_small.jpg
And lastly, if you remember, type in your OS and machine type as a
command. It will complain about it being an invalid command, but I'll
see it in the log and I'll have a better idea of what I'm testing against.
Thanks in advance,
Mike
I thought I would post this for the search engines to latch a hold onto.
It appears that my 20k post including the Cassette Basic source was
killed. If you want the authentic S record listing of MITS Altair 680
KCACR Basic then send me an e-mail... If you mentioned that you wanted it,
please e-mail me off list again. I may forget! I am in the process of
setting up a web page on the 680, so I'll put the information there when
I'm ready.
If someone is interested in helping me "figure out" what is on the leader
and footer of the tape, please request the original files. I have
two. One 8bit ASCII and another forced to 7bit. This one attached has
been forced to 7bit ASCII. Both files WILL load into the Altair without
issue. It seems random which bytes had the 8th bit set and which
didn't. Also, there is what appears to be garbage after the S0 record. I
have no idea why. The tape has a bunch of 7Fs, then S0 and a bunch of
garbage, and then 00s. At the end there is some garbage too. The KCACR
ROM appears to ignore it.
I've found this file reliably loads at 9600bps. It takes 21 seconds to
load into a 680.
.J 0000
MEMORY SIZE?
TERMINAL WIDTH? 80
WANT SIN-COS-TAN-ATN? YES
9604 BYTES FREE
MITS ALTAIR 680 BASIC VERSION 1.1 REV 3.2
--KCACR--
COPYRIGHT 1976 BY MITS INC.
OK
------------------------------------------
S10400F3FF09
S11300000D7600F37E1A4F7E034A00004838002C18
S113001000000000000000000000000000000000DC
S113002000000000000000000000000000000000CC
S113003000000000000000000000000000000000BC
S113004000000000000000000000000000000000AC
S1130050000000000000000000000000000000009C
S1130060000000000000000000000000000000008C
S1130070000000000000000000000000000000007C
S1130080000000000000000000000000000000006C
S1130090000000000000000000000000000000005C
S11300A0000000000000000000000000000000004C
S11300B00000000000000000000000000000007CC0
S11300C000C926037C00C8B6EA60813A240881206E
S11300D027ED803080D039FFEA607E03D500000030
S113010000000000000000000000000000804FC755
S113011052007E1A4F0CF10E6015E6165A16000DA9
S1130120710E410E6C18521932142818BE19681930
S11301306E19B419F811BC10D50F1D117910F510F2
...
Blah hlah blah, ask me for more...
Yeah, no kidding--someone game me a Mac 6100/60. Not very exciting,
but I've upgraded the memory to 40 MB and added a 4GB hard disk from
parts in my hellbox.
So, does anyone have any first-hand experience with Linux on one of
these critters? Is it worth the installation trouble?
Cheers,
Chuck
After a bit of a ponder this should be about as fast as you can get
without putting multiple statements on one line ..
1 GOTO 5
2 WAIT A,D,D
3 POKE B, PEEK(C)
4 GOTO 2
5 A=61456
6 B=61441
7 C=61457
8 D=1
9 GOTO 2
.. if multiple statements per line are allowed then this should be
faster ..
1 A=61456:B=61441:C=61457:D=1
2 WAIT A,D,D:POKE B,PEEK(C):GOTO 2
Lee.
>> Does it pop up saying the disk needs to be initialized? Are you sure
>> it's
>> HFS?
I'd first give Disk First Aid or some similar program a go at it. Start
up DFA first and then insert the disk and scan it. Try covering the HD
hole, also- 800k Macs could format 1.44s at 800k which could confuse a
newer machine. You might be sunk, though, if that's the case, as some
800k drives don't magnetize the disk strongly enough and it is
unreadable after several years.
I have at least a couple I need to get rid of. Too
much stuff. No keyboards or mice (they take the
regular ps/2 type though), no OS, probably busted
drive door hinges, somewhat scuffed up. They weigh
about 40 lbs, so keep that in mind. Free otherwise.
E-mail me offlist please.
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
I'm pretty confused right now. I wrote a small basic program to dump my
cassettes into the computer.
1 IF (1 AND PEEK(61456)) = 0 THEN POKE 61441, PEEK(61457)
2 GOTO 1
61441 - ACIA DATA PORT
61456 - KCACR STATUS PORT
61457 - KCACR DATA PORT
I'm not checking if the ACIA is ready for data, because when reading at
300bps and transmitting at 9600 we should never have to.
Why am I getting strange results below? The only thing I can think of is
that it is somehow missing every other byte from the KCACR. Does anyone
see anything wrong with the basic program? All 500 lines returned are the
exact same length and they all start with 13.
1300D603EAFE3A00880C8
13000000000000000000C
...
1310452E25D34F0FEE5CC
1310C71943CF143316541
Missing every other byte? Maybe the 680 and it's basic isn't fast enough
for my program? I'm just guessing that S1 and 13 are supposed to be there...
S113_0_0_D_6_0_3_E_A_F_E_3_A_0_0_8_8_0_C_8
On top of all this, I'm having a hard time understanding the format.
This is a good line:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
S1 13 0000 0D 76 00 F3 7E 18 F9 7E 03 3C 00 00 48 38 00 2C 7E
S1 means its a data record,
13 is the byte count,
0000 is the address,
and 7E is the checksum.
So what are the mystery bytes? How do you get 13 data bytes and still have
a place for all of the rest? 13 is supposed to include the checksum! The
checksum is the one's compliment of the sum of the all bytes except S1 and
the checksum itself.
FF-(13+0D+76+F3+7E+18+F9+7E+03+3C+48+38+2C)=7E
So 7E is the checksum. I want to know where all those bytes go! :(
Grant
> Cleaning out things and came across 40+ tubes (24/tube) of TTL 5400
> Quad Nand Gates (Mil version of the 7400). Free for postage.
>
> Here's your chance to build your computer from scratch :oD
>
> CRC
'Tis all gone...
CRC
I'm using them for a dovebid sale and while things are scheduled to be
delivered tomorrow (knock on wood), so far I've been pretty
unimpressed with moveit.com. They haven't been very good at
communicating important details like MY SHIPPING ADDRESS, when the
shipment would be made, how payment was to take place, etc.
They say they do a love of business through dovebid, and while that
may be so, I don't think I would use them again in the future compared
to my experiences with cratersandfreighters.com.
Has anyone else used these guys?
What was your experience?
--
"The Direct3D Graphics Pipeline" -- DirectX 9 draft available for download
<http://www.xmission.com/~legalize/book/download/index.html>
Legalize Adulthood! <http://blogs.xmission.com/legalize/>
Hi,
I'm finding inconsistencies between the HP-67 & HP-97.
I'm looking for an HP-97 Manual and saw a note from Joe that stated Mike Haas
found one. Is it for sale?
Gregg
Here is my copy of Altair 680 BASIC. I never owned an Altair, I bought this
for my SWTPC 6800.
The BASIC and manuals are here.
http://www.swtpc.com/mholley/Altair/Altair_Basic.htm
Michael Holley
> Date: Mon, 01 Jan 2007 00:12:12 -0900
> From: Grant Stockly <grant at stockly.com>
> Subject: Altair 680 CSAVE Problems!@ : (
> To: altaircomputerclub at yahoogroups.com, cctalk at classiccmp.org
> Message-ID: <5.2.1.1.0.20061231234847.03956f20 at pop.1and1.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
>
> I'm having a ton of trouble saving a program on a cassette tape using
> Altair 680 basic. Was there a KCACR basic made without the CSAVE
> command? My basic appears to have a CSAVE command, but it won't accept
> the
> name!!!!! : (
>
>Date: Mon, 01 Jan 2007 21:12:47 -0800
>From: "Chuck Guzis" <cclist at sydex.com>
>Yeah, no kidding--someone game me a Mac 6100/60. Not very exciting,
>but I've upgraded the memory to 40 MB and added a 4GB hard disk from
>parts in my hellbox.
>
>So, does anyone have any first-hand experience with Linux on one of
>these critters? Is it worth the installation trouble?
As long as you have a 6100, you should have a look at this page:
<http://www.kan.org/6100/>.
It has a wealth of information all aimed at the 6100 specifically.
Jeff Walther
I'm beginning to wonder if it's time I upgraded my home network. The
NICs on most of the machines are 100BaseT, with the odd old machine
sporting a 10BaseT. But it's the hubs I wonder about--two old
National Semi 6-port Datamover 10BaseT units coupled together with a
10Base2 (coax) link. It's that coax that I dread replacing--it goes
between floors and snaking it through the walls was a real chore.
My DSL speed is 1.6Mbps, so I'm thinking that there's little reason
to upgrade the setup. Am I thinking correctly or am I likely to see
an improvement in internet access speed if I upgrade?
Cheers,
Chuck
ARCHIVE YOUR APPLE FLOPPIES AT THE W6TRW SWAP MEET, JANUARY 2007
Even if your Apple IIe is long gone, you'll soon have a chance to get at
your old data again, when Device Side Data (www.deviceside.com) holds
the second public demonstration of a new USB floppy interface.
USB floppy drives are widely available, but those currently on the market
only support 3.5" disks. The new interface, due to be released later this
year, connects to 5.25" drives. It will also allow the owners of modern
computers to read a variety of old disk formats that ordinary floppy
controllers no longer support.
The demo will take place on Saturday, January 27th, 2007, at the
famous W6TRW swap meet in Redondo Beach, California. Attendees are invited
to bring along a few disks and have image copies made.
The final product will read many disk formats, but the prototype only reads
Apple II disks, so please leave your IBM or CP/M floppies at home for now.
The W6TRW swap meet runs from 7 AM to 11:30 AM in the Northrop Grumman
parking lot near the intersection of Aviation and Marine in Redondo Beach.
There is no fee to attend. Once there, look for the spinning disk in row C.
Besides Device Side Data, many other vendors will also be present, with a
wide range of equipment for sale.
This is an outdoor event and will proceed regardless of weather. Please
carry your disks in waterproof bags in case of rain.
Does anyone out there have a Hewlett Packard 7200A plotter (made around 1972) or a DEC VT50 (not VT52) terminal? I am looking for both of these items for my classic computer center.
Thanks,
Ashley Carder
http://www.woffordwitch.com
"Rick Bensene" <rickb at bensene.com> wrote:
>We had quite a bit of fun writing little programs which would wait
for a
>specific time (during other people's classes), and then "crash" the
>system at that time. Eventually, we got caught.
This reminds me of an interesting phenomenon we discovered in 1974...
the high school had an ASR-33 connected via a leased data line
(telephone with acoustic coupler) to a PDP-8/E running TSS/8 at Clemson
University, 60 miles away.
I can't remember exactly what the code was any more, but it was a very
simple patch -we would deposit a mere three words at location 307
(octal) and execute it (ST 307), and the terminal would log on another
job. So you'd have two accounts open simultaneously on the same TTY!
And if you logged off one account the other would still be open so you
couldn't log off both... they'd have to reboot the system to kill it.
Any TSS/8 gurus know how we might have done this?
We also "inadvertently" deleted the contents of one of the library
DECtapes once... there was a "ZAP" command that zeroed out the tape, so
naturally we would type in "R ZAP" frequently, and get the expected
"WRITE LOCKED" error. One day, though, it actually did it =:^0 Guess
the operator forgot to flip the write lock switch!
-Charles
Michael B. wrote:
In the case of a really old system like that, it doesn't matter what the
network is - the network will never be the problem, unless I use bongos
as the transport mechanism.
Mike
-----------------
I had a computer like that once...
Billy
> Maybe the 680 and it's basic isn't fast enough for my program?
This is quite possible as interpreting decimal numbers takes a fair bit of
processing. You may like to try this ..
1 A=61456:B=61441:C=61457:D=1:E=0
2 IF (D AND PEEK(A)) = E THEN POKE B, PEEK(C)
3 GOTO 2
.. which should speed things up a bit.
Lee.
I just modified my program to get rid of the polling. It did not really
speed up the display of characters. ; )
I can now see the full records with some duplicated digits here and there.
Its interesting that the program below free running can only process
characters at 300bps
1 POKE 61441, PEEK(61457)
2 GOTO 1
At a 500Khz clock thats over 1000 clock cycles per loop. SO THIS IS HOW
Micro-Soft got started with slow software??? ; )
So any suggestions on getting started QUICKLY with 6800 assembler? Maybe
one that outputs in Motorola punch tape format???
I want to archive Altair 680 KCACR basic before anything else happens to
this tape. I had about 5-6 failed loads this weekend and I don't want to
risk loosing this KCACR basic! : (
Grant
Yellow Dog is the most polished distro FWIU. There are
older versions of Mandrake too. Would you get gcc
though I aks myself. Funny...Im not getting an answer
--- cctalk-bounces at classiccmp.org
<pat at computer-refuge.org> wrote:
> On Tuesday 02 January 2007 00:12, Chuck Guzis wrote:
> > Yeah, no kidding--someone game me a Mac 6100/60.
Not very exciting,
> > but I've upgraded the memory to 40 MB and added a
4GB hard disk from
> > parts in my hellbox.
> >
> > So, does anyone have any first-hand experience
with Linux on one of
> > these critters? Is it worth the installation
trouble?
>
> I ran a 6100/60 with a NuBus ethernet card in the
PDS slot (with the
> appropriate PDS->nubus adapter) using Debian with
some old mklinux
> kernel, as a NATing firewall with good success, a
few years ago.
> Support for newer kernels is pretty much
non-existant (I'm not sure if
> they support past 2.2; I know they don't go past 2.4
kernels), so you'd
> have to go with an appropriately vintage Linux
distribution.
>
> Pat
> --
> Purdue University ITAP/RCAC ---
http://www.rcac.purdue.edu/
> The Computer Refuge ---
http://computer-refuge.org
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
>
> I have one of these and I'm looking information on it. I might be willing
> to trade or sell it. If you have any info or interest, please contact me off
> list.
Thanks, Paul
> And with so much radiation being shot onto metals and like, does it
> became radioactive?
>
> I have some MSX here that I want to "give it a shot" (pun intended)
> hehehe
>
Remeber- two types of radiation: particle (Alpha, Beta, neutrons,
protons) and electromagnetic (gamma, X-ray, radio, light, etc). The
particles can make things radioactive, the electromagnetic radiation
cannot.
All:
The SB6120 and the TI74 have been spoken for as of now. Thanks
for your interest.
Dan Veeneman.do you have another email address? I got an error
>from your receiving mail server rejecting my reply. I'll also try sending
>from another account.
Rich
Rich Cini
Collector of classic computers
Lead engineer, Altair32 Emulator
Web site: <http://highgate.comm.sfu.ca/~rcini/classiccmp/>
http://highgate.comm.sfu.ca/~rcini/classiccmp/
Web site: http://www.altair32.com/
/***************************************************/
Fred Csin wrote
>> Keep it in historical context... Bongos were a significant speed
>> increase over smoke signals.
>
> ??
> ~1100 feet per second v 186,000 miles per second
>
> But bongos could operate without line of sight,
> and with or without ambient light.
>
Well, smoke signals may have lower latency, but bongos would have
higher possible switching speeds and so better bandwidth. Things don't
change much, do they?
Scott
---------------Original Message:
Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2007 01:03:53 -0500 (EST)
From: der Mouse <mouse at Rodents.Montreal.QC.CA>
Subject: Re: TCP/IP Testing help, Round 2
> The standard Windows telnet client doesn't do that by default, so you
> will type but not see your characters. That's a project for a
> different day.
What, fixing Windows telnet to actually conform to the spec? Yes,
that's quite a project. :-)
---------------Reply:
Gimme a break; this "project" merely involves getting the free HypertermPE
upgrade from Hilgraeve. Fixes the local echo bug and works just fine.
mike
If it isn't hampering you, I wouldn't mess with it, but
> But it's the hubs I wonder about--two old
> National Semi 6-port Datamover 10BaseT units coupled together with a
> 10Base2 (coax) link. It's that coax that I dread replacing--it goes
> between floors and snaking it through the walls was a real chore.
>
Keep in mind that this time around it won't be so hard- just attach two
nylon strings to the
coax, pull it out, attach your fiber or UTP to one of the strings and
pull it up. Leave the
other string in the wall if you ever need a second line.
At 03:45 AM 12/31/2006 -0500, you wrote:
>On 12/31/06, Chuck Guzis <cclist at sydex.com> wrote:
>>I'm just sorry that I gave away my old 7 CD unit.
>
>I have something like that I was thinking about digging out... it's a
>table-top unit, with a 2X drive and a 7-disc internal changer. I was
>contemplating seeing if I could replace the transport with a SCSI
>DVD-ROM unit just for fun, as 7 CDs isn't all that interesting.
I still have this slick Nakamichi 7 disk scsi CD changer with audio outputs
on the back. Something like MBR-7?? I wish I had a killer application for
it. I wonder if it has enough front panel control to use it as an audio CD
player without connecting to the scsi bus at all-- something like I'm doing
with my NEC Multispin 6x caddy type CD drive. I have it connected to my
stereo, via coax digital audio out. I only have 4 or 5 caddies laying
around though.
>As for the OP's question, if _I_ had a 7 *transport* box, I'd consider
>replacing most or all of the transports with SCSI DVD-ROMs for a
>decent amount of archival storage readback. I could back interesting
>things up to DVD-R on a single writer, then keep the most important
>stuff available for readback. It's not as much storage as even a
>moderate-sized RAID array, but it isn't likely to suffer from
>headcrashes, etc.
>
>-ethan
[Commentary] ...nothing banned in Singapore can be all bad. --Cosma
R. Shalizi, on The Economist
--... ...-- -.. . -. ----. --.- --.- -...
tpeters at nospam.mixcom.com (remove "nospam") N9QQB (amateur radio)
"HEY YOU" (loud shouting) WEB ADDRESS http//www.mixweb.com/tpeters
43? 7' 17.2" N by 88? 6' 28.9" W, Elevation 815', Grid Square EN53wc
WAN/LAN/Telcom Analyst, Tech Writer, MCP, CCNA, Registered Linux User 385531
All:
I was doing some closet-cleaning in the shop this weekend and
came across a few things I have no use for any longer or were bought for
projects that never got off the ground (and probably won't). If anyone's
interested in anything, please email me off list. Shipping to the US only is
not included. Trades considered.
* Seagate 9gb full-height SCSI hard drive (new but unused/untested);
ST940800N: $10
* Compaq-badged external DLT drive 5/10gb (SCSI-I; working last time
used): $25
* Panasonic 616 phone system with 4 keysets (untested but bought
working). I have manuals in electronic form: $50
* STD-BUS 14-slot card cage with assortment of cards (2 analog, 2
digital, 2 relay, Z80 CPU and DSKY. May have other cards in it).
I think I have docs for most of the cards and a disassembly of the ROM. NASA
surplus. All cards should work but it was some sort
of data acquisition or process control system so I never finished fully
decoding the ROM to see what it did. $75
* SpareTimeGizmos SB6120 PDP-8 fully built and working in a Lucite
case. All that's needed is 5v adapter. Includes CF adapter
and 16mb CF card with four disk images. $250 (reflects actual costs of
partial kit and parts I bought).
* TI-74 BASIC-Calc system. Includes unit, PC324 printer and AC
adapter. I will also include CD of random information and programs
that I had collected. $40.
I'm looking specifically for a Tandy CM-1 color monitor for my Tandy 2000
and a small self-contained PC/104 SBC (stand-alone -- not for use with a
backplane) with at least a 486 CPU. I'm also looking for an older Mac Mini
(1.42ghz version with Airport/Bluetooth).
Thanks.
Rich
Rich Cini
Collector of classic computers
Lead engineer, Altair32 Emulator
Web site: <http://highgate.comm.sfu.ca/~rcini/classiccmp/>
http://highgate.comm.sfu.ca/~rcini/classiccmp/
Web site: <http://www.altair32.com/> http://www.altair32.com/
/***************************************************/
Oh my, what am I going to do with these MDI SCSI CD boxes? I have 3 or 4 of
them, each one containing seven CD-ROM drives, a power supply, and some
kind of logical unit controller, so all 7 drives appear a LUNs under one
SCSI address.
The drives are Toshiba XM-5301B, a 4x tray-type (doesn't need caddies) that
works sideways or in the more usual orientation.
Specs here, from http://www.netcomdirect.com/tosxm4xfonco.html
CD-ROM Mode 1 -data discs
CD-ROM Mode 2 - data discs
CD-DA audio discs
CD-DA/ROM - Mixed mode/combined
CD-ROM XA and Photo CD (Single and Multisession)
CD-Bridge (White book, Video CD)
CD-I, CD-I ready
The cabinets are 17" but with ears for std rack mount, 7 inches high, depth
behind the rack 20 inches.
Anyone (local) want some? Anyone got any ideas what to DO with them?
-Tom
[Love] Once he drew With one long kiss my whole soul thro' My lips,
as sunlight drinketh dew. --Alfred Tennyson (1809-1892) Fatima
--... ...-- -.. . -. ----. --.- --.- -...
tpeters at nospam.mixcom.com (remove "nospam") N9QQB (amateur radio)
"HEY YOU" (loud shouting) WEB ADDRESS http//www.mixweb.com/tpeters
43? 7' 17.2" N by 88? 6' 28.9" W, Elevation 815', Grid Square EN53wc
WAN/LAN/Telcom Analyst, Tech Writer, MCP, CCNA, Registered Linux User 385531
I'm having a ton of trouble saving a program on a cassette tape using
Altair 680 basic. Was there a KCACR basic made without the CSAVE
command? My basic appears to have a CSAVE command, but it won't accept the
name!!!!! : (
I'm sending this to two groups. I've been at this problem for hours
now... : (
I'll post a transcript below. Let me know what I'm doing wrong! : (
--------------------
.J FD00 (cassette bootstrap rom address)
(basic loading)
(basic loaded)
.J 0000 (run basic...)
MEMORY SIZE?
TERMINAL WIDTH? 80
WANT SIN-COS-TAN-ATN? YES
9604 BYTES FREE
MITS ALTAIR 680 BASIC VERSION 1.1 REV 3.2
--KCACR--
COPYRIGHT 1976 BY MITS INC.
OK
10 PRINT "HELLO"
20 GOTO 10
CSAVE A
?TM ERROR
OK
--------------------
TM is a type mismatch error. SM is for a command it doesn't
understand. Watch...
--------------------
CSAVE A
?TM ERROR
OK
CSAVE
?SN ERROR
OK
AHHHH!
?SN ERROR
OK
AHHHH! A
?SN ERROR
OK
--------------------
Am I wrong assuming that because it gives me a TM error instead of SN that
it is "trying" to work? I get the same things for CLOAD... How in the
world are you supposed to save something to tape! : (
If I have the wrong version of basic, anyone have the right one? What will
it take for me to get a copy! : ) (first smile in this e-mail... ; ) )
Thanks,
Grant
3000 Series 40, and early 1980s Micro3000XL.
Lee C.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cctalk-bounces at classiccmp.org
> [mailto:cctalk-bounces at classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Richard
> Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2006 10:08 AM
> To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
> Subject: HP-3000 (was: HP HP-2117F on ebay)
>
>
> Speaking of old HP minis, does anyone have an HP-3000 in
> their collection? Not the newer ones, but the ones from the
> mid to late 70s.
> --
> "The Direct3D Graphics Pipeline" -- DirectX 9 draft available
> for download
> <http://www.xmission.com/~legalize/book/download/index.html>
>
> Legalize Adulthood! <http://blogs.xmission.com/legalize/>
>
--- aliensrcooluk at yahoo.co.uk wrote:
>
**>> snip <<**
>
> Yes, you are quite right Chuck.
>
> The ESF (Exatron Stringy Floppy) drive,
> advertised on the back of most of my issues
> of 80 Microcomputing, didn't last long despite
> the heavy advertising.
>
> As I understand it, the folks at Exatron hoped
> it would become the new standard for storing
> data. Unfortunately the 3.5" floppy disk (or
> one of similar size) was invented around the
> same time and, obviously, became the new
> standard.
> The ESF was about x10 faster than a cassette
> and the floppy was much more than that
> (atleast x20?).
>
> As I understand it the ESF's broke down after
> a year or so. The thin layer of stuff (i forget
> now, some ferrous material) which was coated
> onto the erm... mylar (?) started flaking off
> rendering the ESF's useless.
>
>
> I'm sure I read an article on ESF's about 6
> months ago... hense why I know a bit about
> them. It may have been in an issue of 80
> Microcomputing.
>
>
> Regards,
> Andrew D. Burton
> aliensrcooluk at yahoo.co.uk
>
>
Yes, I'm replying to my own message!
I did a quick search on google and came up
with 300 links (searching for "Exatron Stringy
Floppy").
Unfortunately, I was unable to confirm what
the ESF's were made of. The sources also
state different increase read/write rates
over cassette drives. Here are some of the
better links (including pics of the unit and ESF):
http://www.webweavers.co.nz/system-80/hardware_acces
sories.htm
http://www.digibarn.com/collections/devices/stringy-
floppy/index.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stringy_Floppy
Regards,
Andrew D. Burton
aliensrcooluk at yahoo.co.uk
Bongos? Babaloonet? LOL LOL LOL
--- cctalk-bounces at classiccmp.org
<mbbrutman-cctalk at brutman.com> wrote:
> Zane H. Healy wrote:
> >> Even with 5Mbps cable modem, my slowest
connection inside is still
> >> faster that my connection to the outside world.
> >
> > You obviously don't have any really old systems on
your network. I'm
> > still at 1.5Mbps, and have systems on my network
that can't keep up with
> > that.
> >
> > Zane
> >
>
>
> The context was the networking gear, not the
machines. I think my PCjr
> is fairly slow.
>
> In the case of a really old system like that, it
doesn't matter what the
> network is - the network will never be the problem,
unless I use bongos
> as the transport mechanism.
>
>
> Mike
>
>
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
--- Chuck Guzis <cclist at sydex.com> wrote:
**>> snip <<**
>
> You know, I've never had anyone ask about converti
ng
> one of the Brier
> flopticals (I've got the drive) or the Drivetech
> floppies, much less
> an Amlyn or Exatron stringly floppy. I can only
> conjecture that the
> media didn't last very long.
>
**>> snip <<**
> Cheers,
> Chuck
>
Yes, you are quite right Chuck.
The ESF (Exatron Stringy Floppy) drive,
advertised on the back of most of my issues
of 80 Microcomputing, didn't last long despite
the heavy advertising.
As I understand it, the folks at Exatron hoped
it would become the new standard for storing
data. Unfortunately the 3.5" floppy disk (or
one of similar size) was invented around the
same time and, obviously, became the new
standard.
The ESF was about x10 faster than a cassette
and the floppy was much more than that
(atleast x20?).
As I understand it the ESF's broke down after
a year or so. The thin layer of stuff (i forget
now, some ferrous material) which was coated
onto the erm... mylar (?) started flaking off
rendering the ESF's useless.
I'm sure I read an article on ESF's about 6
months ago... hense why I know a bit about
them. It may have been in an issue of 80
Microcomputing.
Regards,
Andrew D. Burton
aliensrcooluk at yahoo.co.uk
Anyone have an urgent need for 300' of thicknet? Never been used, approx
117m (according to the writing on the spool) with one cut end and one
N-connector on the other end.
It's 50ohm cable right? Maybe I can use it for amateur radio, if I keep it
indoors away from the UV.
[Oops] It's a question of whether we're going to go forward into the
future, or past into the back. --Dan Quayle
--... ...-- -.. . -. ----. --.- --.- -...
tpeters at nospam.mixcom.com (remove "nospam") N9QQB (amateur radio)
"HEY YOU" (loud shouting) WEB ADDRESS http//www.mixweb.com/tpeters
43? 7' 17.2" N by 88? 6' 28.9" W, Elevation 815', Grid Square EN53wc
WAN/LAN/Telcom Analyst, Tech Writer, MCP, CCNA, Registered Linux User 385531
Brent Hilpert wrote: I always
kind of liked the idea of making an entire processor out of just one basic
gate/IC type.
-------------------------
Didn't Seymour Cray do this on one of his later machines? The Cray 2?
Seems like it was a 5 input And gate.
But then he always did like to minimalize. The 6600, his first big iron,
used one transistor type tied together in different ways to make gates, flip
flops and timing circuits. He used circles and squares to denote gates -
but whther they were And or Ors depended on what fed them. Ah, twas fun to
work with. And I loved the esthetics of the logic diagrams. All those
little squares and circles had a kind of magic to them.
Billy
>Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 10:30:36 -0700
>From: Richard <legalize at xmission.com>
>In article <458726D7.17136.1434D6AA at cclist.sydex.com>,
> "Chuck Guzis" <cclist at sydex.com> writes:
>
>> But, given that the original uses RTL and core, what's the point of
>> building one in LSTTL?
>
>Is it even possible to build with RTL parts anymore?
>
>I guess you'd have to do it PDP-8 style with discrete transistors?
Is there a guide somewhere to the different families of logic, such
as RTL, TTL, LSTTL (never heard of that one) and CMOS? I was
choosing some simple logic components for my IIfx SIMM project the
other day and was somewhat bewildered by the choice of input/output
levels. Also, some are Schmidt Triggered?
My understanding extends to the idea that there are differences in
how they (at what voltage) interpret the low and high states but
beyond that, I'm ignorant.
Anyway, before I go on a Google hunt (which will probably turn up all
the surplus electronics suppliers and pricegrabber links first) does
anyone already know of a nice educational source on the topic?
Jeff Walther
> > Sometimes Goodwill has interesting stuff. Here's one you don't see
> > every day:
> >
> > http://shopgoodwill.com/viewItem.asp?ItemID=2423761
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Chuck
> >
> Thanks for the heads up and I bided on the item for the museum and it's at
> $21 right now.
> John
These are sold by the National Atomic Museum on Kirtland AFB in Albuquerque, NM:
http://www.atomicmuseum.com/store/ProductItem.cfm?Category=7
I bought mine (016 of 340) about eight years ago for $50 when I visited the museum. I'm amazed
they haven't sold all 340 by now. They now sell for $58 new to give you an idea of what your
maximum bid should be if you don't just buy a new one from the museum. The one in the auction has
been re-framed. I re-framed and re-matted mine but in a much nicer black frame than the one in
the auction (frame only cost me $5 on sale at Target due to superficial damage on its BACK side).
I, also, made some new labels with far more info about the machine and specific board.
ASCI Red, the first tera-ops supercomputer was recently decommissioned at Sandia (on Kirtland):
http://www.sandia.gov/ASCI/Red/
I emailed the National Atomic Museum to suggest that they get some boards and frame them because
of the significance of the tera-ops barrier. I received no response.
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
Almost all new equipment has to comply with "RoHS" (Reduction of Hazardous
Substances) requirements, which among other things means it's made with
lead-free solder. Enforcement is stronger in Europe than in the US, but in
any case industry is cleary moving in that direction even when and where not
absolutely required by law.
Question: If one is repairing RoHS compliant equipment, with respect to
functionality only is there a problem with using conventional tin/lead
solder? I'm not asking if it's legal or "environmentally friendly", I'm
asking if mixing the lead free solder and conventional tin/lead solder will
cause functional problems (for example, any kind of problems similar to
those which we used to see when someone repaired electronic equipment using
plumbing acid flux solder).
Also, if one wants to acquire and use RoHS compliant solder, are there any
changes that someone accustomed to conventional tin/lead solder needs to
make to their soldering technique? And I guess I should also ask the
reverse question from the paragraph above: Are there any issues in using
lead-free RoHS compliant solders on equipment originally built from tin/lead
solder?
Are there any other implications of RoHS that a casual classic computer and
electronics enthusiast should know about, in either direction?
Hi guys,
I've been having an esclating correspondance with a chap named
"Murray Balascak" (anyone know him?) - who contacted me regarding
his displeasure with my mention of the Apple-1 on the Apple-II page of
my site - here is what I have posted as part of my introdiuction to the
Apple-II:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In 1976, Steve Wozniak and Steve Jobs formed the Apple Computer Company,
and built a home computer they called the "Apple 1" in their garage. Although it
required the users to provide their own cabinet, power supply, keyboard and
video monitor, it didn't require a separate terminal, and a simple BASIC interpreter
could be loaded with an optional cassette interface. Although it required a fairly
technical user to complete the system and make it usable, about 200 Apple 1s
were sold in the first year.
The following year (1977), Apple refined the design, providing a keyboard and
power supply and packaging the machine in a attractive low-profile plastic cabinet
with simple connections for the video monitor and tape storage. Now - anyone
who could plug two connectors together could use this computer. The result, called
"Apple 2" was one of the most successful early personal computers, and sold
many thousands of units.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In Mr. Balascaks first correspondance, he stated that the KIM-1 was a far
better machine than the Apple-1, asked if I had succumbed to "the relentless
revisionism of the brand zealots?", and demanded that I "correct the above
reference to show the machine's irrelevance".
In his second correspondance, he stated that I am spreading "Apple
propaganda", again stated that the KIM-1 was better, sold in higher
quantities and cheaper (I still do not know what the KIM-1 has to do
with an Apple-II page).
In his third correspondance he acqused me of "posting lies and being
worse than useless by corrupting history into fiction". Again, he stated
that the KIM-1 was a far better machine and much cheaper.
In his last email, he indicated that he believes I am responsable for the
degradation of the internet and the reason that it cannot be trusted as
a source of information.
I don't know where this is coming from - I believe my reference to the
Apple-1 is accurate considering it's brevity - Apple was formed in 1976
and operated out of Jobs basement. The Apple-1 was sold through the
homebrew computer club as well as a few of stores, and although I do
not have confirmed numbers of sales, I believe it was around 200
units.
It was never my intention to make a page about the Apple-1 (I don't have
one, and I only feature systems on my site which are in my collection)...
I believe at some point someone asked why I didn't mention the Apple-1
so I added this one paragraph as part of the Apple-II history. I have no
other references to the Apple-1 (at least that I can recall) on my site.
In all of my responses to him, I indicated that I am unwilling to change
the site based on the hearsay of one individual, especially when that
person has an apparent (in my opinion based on correspondance
received) bias for or against the material being questioned, however I
would be happy to revise the site in response to any documented
facts/evidence he can provide that the material I have is incorrect.
All I have received in return is statements about how much better the
KIM-1 was (I make no such comparisons on my site), how expensive
the Apple-1 and Apple-II were (I post no such prices on my site), and
rants about a website that apparently lists Woz as the "inventor of
the single-board computer" (I make no such claim on my site).
I should probably just ignore it - but the fact that I have been accused
of lying and deliberatly posting misinformation is disturbing to me ...
So - I throw it to the list - As a background statement showing that
Apple existed and sold a predecessor in small volumes for a time
before the Apple-II ... Is my posting above non-factual? If so, in
what way, and can you provide supporting documentation?
Please keep in mind that I do not wish to post a page about the Apple-1,
only a single paragraph as a way of introducing the guys who built
the Apple-2.
Regards,
Dave
--
dave06a (at) Dave Dunfield
dunfield (dot) Firmware development services & tools: www.dunfield.com
com Collector of vintage computing equipment:
http://www.classiccmp.org/dunfield/index.html
Hi Will,
Look for an Apple II with the "Alpha Centauri" (or did they call it "Alpha
Syntauri"?) package. It was fantastic! It used two cards from a company
named "Mountain Hardware" and was an amazing synthesizer with 5 octave AGO
keyboard and waveform design software. It was polyphonic but I don't
remember the number of voices. I had the pleasure of using one while at
George Mason University in Fairfax Virginia. We bought one (I was a
computer center administrator there at the time) for evaluation and then
bought more for the music department, and they loved them!
If you can find one, it will be a real treasure! I don't remember if I
have any recordings, and if I do they would be on cassette tapes that would
be nearly 30 years old. I did use a lot of metal tape back in those days,
so if the binder on the tape is still good, they may be playable. First,
I'll have to see if any of the recordings still exist, and that will have
to wait until I'm recovered (bronchitis).
Good luck with your project!
John
At 12/24/2006 04:08 PM, William Donzelli wrote:
>I am currently working on a project involving music made with
>computers before MIDI. Some aspects and examples might be the old
>mainframes playing tunes on band printers, minicomputers making tunes
>with RFI, microcomputers controlling analog synthesizers, and so
>forth.
>
>I have no strict timeline on this, but I would like to pull things
>together in a few months maximum.
>
>Things I am looking for:
>
>1) Recordings of 2nd generation (or even before, if they exist)
>mainframes making tunes. There are a few recordings out there, and I
>may be getting some help from CHM for more.
>
>2) A working 1970s era minicomputer with core, probably a PDP-8 or
>Nova, that is reliable enough to make a performance.
>
>3) A 1970s era microcomputer controlling an analog synthesizer.
>
>4) Outstanding examples of Atari and/or C64s making music.
>
>5) Leads to artists and musicians that used classic computers in
>recordings, famous or not. Decent quality MP3s would be great.
>
>6) An example of the HP printer (a deskjet?) that contains the musical
>Easter Egg, operational.
>
>7) Any examples of music made by computer algorithms, remixes by
>computer, and so forth. Experimental works are welcome.
>
>8) Any suggestions to expand this. The computers need not be classics,
>the music need not be oddball, but the results should be a little on
>the weird side (for example, I do not need a Pentium 3 running
>Protools making trance).
>
>While I am not looking to buy any of these machines, I am looking for
>examples that are very reliable, and can travel to New Jersey for a
>Saturday morning (probably). Appearance is not important, being this
>will all take place in a studio.
>
>There is a very slim chance I can provide the minicomputer, but all my
>tapes are lost in limbo, so I doubt it. Being a PDP-8/S, normal PDP-8
>music tapes will not work. There is also a chance I can provide a
>Minimoog synthesizer, if someone can provide the microcomputer with
>D/A cards (for the control voltages) and some sort of software for
>making a tune.
>
>So please go and think about this, and tell me what you think, and if
>you can contribute. Certainly proper credit will be given to those
>that can help out, but sorry, no money. I am not getting paid for this
>either.
>
>Thank you for your time.
>
>--
>Will
John
*** When replying to this message, please do not delete these ***
*** signature lines. Otakon Katsucon HP3000-L @classiccmp.org ***
*** DigitalCosplay.comJohnKorbPhoto.comJohnPKorb.com ***
Been looking at Process Software's stuff- for people who have worked
with MultiNet and TCPware, what's the difference? Process doesn't seem
to have a comparison between the two, only comparing with UCX. Which is
easier for a newcomer to VMS to configure?
I know that the issue is with TCP/IP v5.0 on the VAX since the same
problems do not occur with an Alpha running VMS v7.3-1-TCP/IP v5.3. The
network bogs down with many surplus packets as soon as a telnet
connection is opened (doesn't happen with rsh/rlogin).
might be time to polish the ol bifocals mon frere LOL
LOL
--- cctalk-bounces at classiccmp.org
<ard at p850ug1.demon.co.uk> wrote:
> >
> > are we talking about the same puters lol?
>
> Ouch!. No we're not...
>
> I read 'Portable' and 'Plus' in the message text and
assumed we were
> talking about Apple Macs. What I said applies to
those machines...
>
> -tony
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
Found this on another list- thought someone might be interested.
Hi all,
I have a few older Silicon Graphics systems up for grabs if anyone is
interested. There's three 4D Predator racks, a deskside 4D/70GT and a
Challenge XL. All the machines are complete except for the Challenge
which is missing the CPU and memory boards. Except for that everything
is there. They also come with a few boxes of parts, cables, keyboards
and such. A 17" SGI monitor is also part of the lot.
Pictures here:
http://web.newsguy.com/AlexPhotos/sgi.html
Everything is free if you take them as is. If you only want boards or
other parts, I'll charge a small fee for the packaging material and for
my time.
The machines are located in Montreal, Canada.
Thanks.
Alex.
are we talking about the same puters lol?
--- cctalk-bounces at classiccmp.org
<ard at p850ug1.demon.co.uk> wrote:
> >
> > Before I open up both the Plus and the Portable
II,
> > can anyone tell me if the floppy drives are
swappable?
> > Obviously the Plus can't utilize a HD drive, but
what
> > about the other way around? Much appreciated.
>
> One thing I'll warn you about is that the ribbon
cables may not be what
> they seem. They have 20 pin connectors on the end,
but some of the
> 'wires' don't exist, that position on the cable is
solid plasic. Confused
> the hell out of me when I was looking isside a Mac+.
'Why is there -5V at
> that end of f the cable and the external eject
signmal at that end????' I
> am told the colour of the 'pin 1' stripe has some
significance, but I
> don't know the code.
>
> -tony
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
I had heard somewhere that Compaq used non standard
drives, but perhaps that applies to different (newer?)
models.
--- cctalk-bounces at classiccmp.org <cclist at sydex.com>
wrote:
> On 30 Dec 2006 at 11:11, Chris M wrote:
>
> > are we talking about the same puters lol?
>
> I was wondering the same thing, myself. The Plus is
the hard disk
> successor to the original Portable. Both have ISA
buses and fairly
> normal PC peripherals (and lousy keyboards, IMOHO).
>
> http://utopia.knoware.nl/users/stuurmn/complus.htm
>
> At worst, adding a new card may require that you use
a half-length
> card; the card cage for both the plus and portable
can accommodate
> rather tall 8-bit ISA cards.
>
> Cheers,
> Chuck
>
>
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
I posted this to CSA2 today. I figured you guys would want to download
these files. If you're anything like me, then you're a digital pack rat. ; )
In preparation for cutting my Apple IIe motherboard in half I decided
it would help to have an x-ray of the board. This way it will be easy
to determine the most efficient cut line.
I've included an X-Ray of a Disk II card just for fun.
The X-Rays are at 300dpi. I'm not an X-Ray tech so my calibration was
a little off. Our resident X-ray guy is gone today. I'm not sure he
would be interested in an Apple IIe motherboard any way. ; ) Some
areas are dark. By adjusting "Levels" in photoshop you can bring them
out.
The motherboard received a dose rate of 17.84 R/min for the scans and
calibration. About 27 minutes (for 3 scans and a calibration). This
would have been a dose of 482 Rad.
The Disk II card received the same dose rate, but it was in the vault
for the whole time the motherboard was in there. It received radiation
for a total of about 32 minutes. 571 Rad.
To put it in perspective, if a group of people were exposed to that
dose 50-90% would die after 30 days. (90% without intensive medical
care). Primary cause of death is internal bleeding and infections.
Females become permanently sterile.
Motherboard:
http://www.stockly.com/images2/061228-Apple_II_80kv6ma35ms36SFD-Cut%20Edges…
Disk II:
http://www.stockly.com/images2/061228-Disk_II_80kv6ma35ms36SFD-Cut%20Edges.…
Any comments?
Grant
Scott,
> At 3:41 PM -0800 12/29/06, Scott Quinn wrote:
> >I'm running a VAX 4000/200 with OpenVMS 7.2 (Hobbyist V2) on it, and
> >I'm having terrible problems with the networking. (DIGITAL
> >TCP/IP/UCX v5.0). It seems that there were some bugs in this
> >release, but I'm not yet sure exactly how to find the fixes for them
> >(and the HP/DIGITAL website doesn't seem to be very helpful).
> >Especially when running telnet, the VAX slows to a crawl. What have
> >other members with this problem (and no access to newer UCXes at
> >work or other locations) done?
If you're telnetting into the VAX from Linux, make sure to issue:
'export TERM=vt100' before you connect with the telnet command. The
string 'xterm' especially drives your VAX CPU usage through the roof,
for some reason I was never told. All I know is that specifying
'vt100' or another terminal type VAX knows will solve that problem
easily.
Josef
--
"I laugh because I dare not cry. This is a crazy world
and the only way to enjoy it is to treat it as a joke."
-- Hilda "Sharpie" Burroughs,
"The Number of the Beast" by Robert A. Heinlein
I'm running a VAX 4000/200 with OpenVMS 7.2 (Hobbyist V2) on it, and
I'm having terrible problems with the networking. (DIGITAL TCP/IP/UCX
v5.0). It seems that there were some bugs in this release, but I'm not
yet sure exactly how to find the fixes for them (and the HP/DIGITAL
website doesn't seem to be very helpful). Especially when running
telnet, the VAX slows to a crawl. What have other members with this
problem (and no access to newer UCXes at work or other locations) done?
DEC bigots can skip this message safely. :-)
I've been working on a TCP/IP stack for my beloved PCjr. There are
already TCP/IP stacks that run on it, but that's not the point.
Borrowing a page from Tony's book, I decided to write my own so that I
could fix the inevitable bugs.
Anyway, I'm interested in reducing memory consumption. Any complex code
involves tradeoffs between function and performance, and I've been
careful, but one thing that is bothering me is the initialization code.
I've got a fair amount of code that reads environment variables, talks
to the packet driver, and sets up data structures. The nature of the
code is that it runs once, and then just sits there consuming memory.
Waaay back in history I was a Zbasic user - Zbasic was a fairly nice
BASIC dialect/compiler. Zbasic had overlay support, which I used
extensively. It wasn't sophisticated, but it did the job. It would be
perfect for this code - init everything that I need, and then overlay
the init code with the run code.
Now 20 years later I'm using Turbo C++ 3.0 for this project, and it has
overlay support but it has a more complicated memory manager that goes
along with it. I don't have a lot of 'gas' in the code, so going to the
VROOOM overlay manager just to overlay my init code is overkill, and
will probably require more memory. I was hoping Borland had a simpler
mechanism ...
Any ideas? The only one I can think of is kind of brute force ... have
two apps, one that inits everything and leaves the storage resident, and
another that refers to that resident storage. (I was hoping for
something simpler in the Borland runtime support.)
Mike
PS: I'm still looking for a late version of Zbasic .. I had 4.02 and I
know that 4.71 was released. I'd love to see what it evolved to, but
that's a different topic.
Before I open up both the Plus and the Portable II,
can anyone tell me if the floppy drives are swappable?
Obviously the Plus can't utilize a HD drive, but what
about the other way around? Much appreciated.
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
On 12/27/06, Jeff Walther <trag at io.com> wrote:
>
>
> This is a bit off-topic for the thread, but deals with the same
> philosophy of selling question.
> ...
Well, I shopped on ebay for 8250 UART's. I saw 19 pieces listed for $0.75
each. I offered best offer of $0.50 each for all. Of course I was rejected,
but to my surprise the price was then raised to $2.75 a piece. I am not
sure whether it was a price error or a new model of business. Fortunately I
am not so eager to get those chips, and I bought some from others for $0.50
a piece.
vax, 9000
> Jeff Walther
>
Lucky strike today :
10 swiss francs (7.50 USD) got me a ADM-3a in very reasonable cosmetic
state, with the dip-switch cover still intact, and with the optional
numeric keyboard.
On opening , I saw the unit even included the RG512 graphics option!
Not is all well , the crt has a severe case of moulding. This was
discussed before, I believe changing the CRT was the only good option ?
The unit also does not work. This might have to do with the can of Coke
that seems to have been emptied onto the keyboard and surroundings...
I will use my normal cleaning procedure of toothbrush and tapwater, and
letting things dry naturally.
Anyone have suggestions for the specific case of semi-dried Coke ?
Jos DReesen
>>
>> Mac portrait displays are presumably similarly difficult to get
>> replacement
>> CRTs for, at least without realigning the yoke (I gather that most
>> CRTs don't
>> like a change in orientation, although I used to run a Sun colour
>> display on
>
> Do colour portrait displays exist? The reason I ask is that I wonder if
> they use specially designed CRTs. IIRC, the whole point of the 'in line
> gun' (PIL) CRT was that the 3 electron gus were in a horizontal line,
> so
> that only the vertical component of the earth's magnetic field had much
> effect on the convergence, and that was relatively constant in a given
> area. So if the CRT was set up properly you could move the unit around
> without having to do a reconvergence (this was a problem with delta-gun
> CRTs which had to be set up in the positionan nnd orientation where
> they
> were going to be used, but if that was done they give an excellent
> picture).
>
> -tony
For a time anyway Radius produced the Color Pivot portrait/landscape
monitor.
When I was at school I saw a LCD that had an adjustment for (what would
that be? skew?) and for a while thought that someone had brought the
concept back. No dice, though.
Cool - I've been watching tcpdump on the Linux box, so I'm seeing the
activity.
I'll spare everybody and ask that people send me email (directly) only
if they see a problem. I'm going to comb through the logs from the DOS
box and the tcpdump when all is done to see if I missed any corner cases
in the protocol.
Straight TCP/IP is pretty fun to do. Getting the error handling down is
not as easy. I'm also missing a few functions:
- I'm not honoring the receive window from the other side.
- I'm not detecting or cleaning up half-open connections.
- I don't have a really robust algorithm for measuring round trip packet
time and determining a timeout period. (I'm just defaulting to 10 secs ..)
All of this will get fixed, but I was so desperate after a year of work
to see this code do something. :-)
Mike
I recently dug out an IBM XT to create some 5.25 floppy images and
while I'm at it I thought I'd try to get the Plus Hardcard 20
installed it it working. (This is a dual floppy XT without an
original IBM hard drive).
Does anyone know how to low-level format the Plus Hardcard 20? There
is ROM data at C800:0, but it doesn't look like g=C8000:5 would
execute valid code so I don't think that is the trick with this drive.
I searched the net for while but came up empty for useful info.
-Glen