> platforms.
>
>
The idea is impressive, but that PCB is huge. Any chance the design
could be made smaller?
Jim
Hi Jim
The PropIO was designed as an ECB standard board (160x100mm) Eurocard format
and is intended for use with the rest of the N8VEM system. However, the
subject came up of adding SD to KayPro on the vintage-computer.com forums
and rather than designing a board unique to that system my hope is to reuse
an existing part with little or no modification. If you were to design a
specific Propeller board for the KayPro it could be much smaller but then it
would be forever tied to that platform.
The concept here is to make an adapter board to allow general purpose N8VEM
boards to provide IO to the less common vintage computers that are
"stranded" due to lack of current hardware development and/or small
developer community. WaveMate Bullet is an example but I am sure there are
dozens if not hundreds of others. I am trying to gauge what sort of
interest there is in this approach if any. Certainly this is less than
optimal solution for any specific machine but then it may be applicable
across a whole spectrum of vintage computers (Z80 DIP 40 socket).
Most likely this idea will go no where but it is interesting to me and the
initial test results are showing promise. This in theory could be a way to
add features like DiskIO (IDE/FDC), video (VDU), or microSD (PropIO) to less
common systems that otherwise would never get it.
Thanks and have a nice day!
Andrew Lynch
PS, the empty sockets on the PropIO are for the second Propeller. It is
currently unallocated but communicates with the SBC over the ECB in a
similar fashion as the first Propeller which serves the PS/2 keyboard, VGA,
and microSD interface. The second Propeller has several free IO pins which
are intended for builder experimentation. There are a few proposed ideas on
how to use the second Propeller such as an EN28J60 Ethernet interface with
PropNIC and/or the Propeller USB converter. I was planning initially on
adding TV, audio, and some other toy doodads but the other builders
convinced me to keep the second Propeller unallocated and instead add the
mini prototyping area. The PropIO also includes a mezzanine connector and
mounting hardware for a full sized mezzanine "upper deck" so builders can
add whatever suits them. PropIO is a rather experimental board and not
really a final design - more of a proof of concept. Thus it is ideal for
situations where non-typical adaptations like jamming into a KayPro are
being explored.
Hi!
I am working with one of the N8VEM builders to make an interface to allow a
generic Z80 CPU computer (DIP 40 socket) to interface to the N8VEM PropIO
board. The benefit of this would be that any Z80 computer with a DIP 40
socket could add VGA, PS/2 keyboard, and microSD capability. I think this
would be helpful for debugging and also transferring data from legacy
platforms.
http://groups.google.com/group/n8vem/msg/b287ef9fbe0f1e8d
Since the board plugs directly into the Z80 CPU socket it is independent of
any particular bus. Any new installation would require custom software for
the platform. It appears the KayPro can access the PropIO using MBASIC so
writing software should be practical.
In theory, this approach may be applicable to any of the N8VEM ECB
peripheral boards (Disk IO, VDU, prototyping board, etc). The concept may
be applicable to other CPUs with the appropriate shim socket PCBs. I
believe this could be particularly helpful for classic computers that lack
an active development community.
If anyone is interested in doing some experimentation with your vintage Z80
computer please contact me. Thanks and have a nice day!
Andrew Lynch
Curious...
Who here has a DECwriter I (LA30)? This is the original early 70s
DECwriter made out of Flip Chips. Google for a picture.
Who here would like a DECwriter I?
No, I am not selling, just curious...
--
Will
I want $5 + shipping per book; I'll try to minimize shipping costs by
shipping all the books together.
As for publishing years:
The Waite Group's UNIX? Primer Plus 1991
Introduction To UNIX? 1992
QuickBASIC Programmer's Toolkit 1989
UNIX? Programmer's Reference 1992
UNIX? Networking 1991
Exploring the UNIX? System, Second Edition 1991
EXAM CRAM TCP/IP for MCSE 1999
Also, I did not originally list this book:
UNIX? Shell Commands: Quick Reference (QUE Publishing) ISBN
0-88022-572-6 1992
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 18:37, Roy J. Tellason, Sr. <rtellason at verizon.net>wrote:
>
> What years were they published? That would help. Too, you don't say what
> you'd want for them?
>
> --
> Member of the toughest, meanest, deadliest, most unrelenting -- and
> ablest -- form of life in this section of space, a critter that can
> be killed but can't be tamed. --Robert A. Heinlein, "The Puppet Masters"
> -
> Information is more dangerous than cannon to a society ruled by lies.
> --James
> M Dakin
>
Saw this in the news today:
http://www.acm.org/press-room/news-releases/2010/turing-award-09/
NEW YORK, March 9, 2010 ? ACM, the Association for Computing Machinery
today named Charles P. Thacker the winner of the 2009 ACM A.M. Turing
Award http://awards.acm.org/2010/turing-award.cfm for his pioneering
design and realization of the Alto, the first modern personal
computer, and the prototype for networked personal computers.
Thacker?s design, which he built while at Xerox PARC (Palo Alto
Research Center), reflected a new vision of a self-sufficient,
networked computer on every desk, equipped with innovations that are
standard in today?s models. Thacker was also cited for his
contributions to the Ethernet local area network, which enables
multiple computers to communicate and share resources, as well as the
first multiprocessor workstation, and the prototype for today?s most
used tablet PC, with its capabilities for direct user interaction.
The Turing Award, widely considered the ?Nobel Prize in Computing,? is
named for the British mathematician Alan M. Turing. The award carries
a $250,000 prize, with financial support provided by Intel Corporation
and Google Inc.
Does anyone have any rack rails for sale (uk) for a regular 19" rack? These don't need to be the sliding type just a basic L shape rail?
Contact me of list if you have anything. They are tricky to find for a reasonable price
Thanks
Ian
Guys, don't confuse "rare" with "more historic". "Rare" just means
"fewer". If the people at Tandy produced a limited-edition TRS-80, and
the only difference was it had a yellow polka-dot case design, and only
100 were ever made, does that mean it's more "rare" than a Straight-8?
Technically, yes! Does that make it more historic? It's too dumb a
question to even ask.
(I'm not putting down the PERQ systems, etc.; those are certainly
historic in their own regard.)
And yes, DEC isn't as popular as Apple; there won't be millions of DEC
fanboys and stuff ......
But it's hard to argue that the Straight-8 isn't one of the most *
historic * systems ever made, re: historic = grand context and
importance to the history of the computer industry. Rarity is a big
factor too, but the '8 has it all. Historic, rare, desirable.
Christian, received your email fine but still unable to reply. Here's
the kind of errors I'm receiving, even with different email addresses:
----------------------------------------
A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its
recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed:
corticn at zdi2.informatik.uni-stuttgart.de
<mailto:corticn at zdi2.informatik.uni-stuttgart.de>
(generated from cc at corti-net.de <mailto:cc at corti-net.de>)
SMTP error from remote mail server after RCPT
TO:<corticn at zdi2.informatik.uni-stuttgart.de
<mailto:corticn at zdi2.informatik.uni-stuttgart.de>>:
host mailgw.informatik.uni-stuttgart.de [129.69.211.42]:
554 5.7.1 <jws at casient.net <mailto:jws at casient.net>>: Sender address
rejected:
Access denied
----------------------------------------
Hi. This is the qmail-send program at mail2.sea5.speakeasy.net.
I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses.
<cc at informatik.uni-stuttgart.de>:
129.69.211.41 does not acknowledge recipient.
Remote host said: 554 5.7.1 <js at cimmeri.com>: Sender address rejected: Access denied
Giving up on 129.69.211.41.
- John Singleton