The good news : I've got the HP Datacomm program, and it seems to work
fine with that HP82915 modem board that I mentioned last week.
Amazingly, then, the kermit supplied by HP for the Integral does not
support the modem. Hmmm... One to watch for if you're trying to get one
of these modems to behave.
Alsa, from what I can see the Datacomm program is user friendly (in other
words, hacker hostile). It only lets me set 300 or 1200 baud (why not
110? A 300 baud modem will work at lower baud rates). It only uses the
modem in 'originate' mode. It does pulse dialling, not DTMF (why???)
But it seems to work. My only problem now is getting something for it to
talk to. I have no intention of using it on anything other than a bit of
cable on my bench, so approval is not a problem. Maybe I'll just dig out
an AM7910 chip and start soldering...
-tony
I've just boaght what appears to be a brand new HP 98622 GPIO card. This
is the 16 bit parallel I/O card for the DIO bus, as is used on the 9836, etc
It came with a user manual. This was a lot more use than I expected it to
be as it includes a schematic. It's a fairly thin manual, but full of
information. One interesting diagram at the back shows the correspondence
betweene the DIP switches on this card and the links in the 98032 I/O
module for the 9825...
Anyway, it describes 4 'options' for this card. Each one was a particular
cable -- one was the 50 pin Blue Ribbon plug to fit the card and bare
wires on the other end. The other 3 were wired to connectors to fit the
9885 disk drive (9" floppy), a Multiprogrammer (I forget the number, but
the one that didn't have an HPIB interface) and finally one for the 9866
printer.
The manual does give the switch settings to use the board with each of
these devices, but no wirelists of the cables. And amazigly I have all 3
of the listed peripherals.
So my question is obvious. Does anyone have any of these cables and could
'buzz out' the wiring?
-tony
Howdy list,
I've just picked up a Computer Logics PCTD III 9-track tape drive ISA
adapter board. It has a 68-pin D-sub socket on the mounting bracket for
connection to a Pertec interface drive (I've got a brand new Fujitsu
M2444AC).
My problem is that I have no documentation or software at all for this
thing. I called Chi Corporation to see what they have for it and they said
that they've long since disposed of any information on the card. The only
thing that the guy at Chi could remember is that it doesn't work with faster
CPUs.
So I'm stuck for any information on this board. I'm looking for either copy
of software or technical documentation for the card. My intent is to write
either a Linux or XP driver for this thing and I'll be happy to share the
results of my work.
Can anyone help out?
Thanks much!
Chuck Guzis
Sydex, Inc.
Several folks have sent me Emails concerning the status of getting TSX Plus
online. The delay is my fault: I changed ISPs recently and have had to move
our company website, ftp, mail, etc. to the new site. We are also in the
process of becoming the U.S. mirror for a large european SGI tech. info site
(hopefully to be completed in a week or so). I'll post it when it's up and
running.
I expect to have the time within the next couple of weeks to have all the
TSX-Plus goodies available online.
Cheers,
Lyle
--
Lyle Bickley
Bickley Consulting West Inc.
Mountain View, CA
http://bickleywest.com
"Black holes are where God is dividing by zero"
At 21:47 17/09/2005 -0500, you wrote:
>A colleague of mine is looking for a boot disk for a Kaypro 4 '84. He
>says :
>
>"I have a Kaypro 4 (83), Kaypro 4(84), and a Kaypro 10.
>The boot disks for all three are mutually incompatible.
>What I still need is a boot disk for Kaypro 4(84)."
>
>(These are 5.25 inch floppies, of course. An actual disk would be great,
>but he says that if somebody wanted to send a disk image, he could work
>with that, as long as he knew what program was used to create it.)
>
>Can anyone email me images of all boot disks or direct me to appropriate
>web site? I will reimburse postage/disk costs if someone wishes to send
>physical disks instead of emailing images.
>
>Braldey Slavik
I have the Kaypro4(*84) system disk images on my site. Look under
"disk/software images" near the end of the main page. The disks can
be created with my ImageDisk program which is available on the same
page.
NOTE that I just fixed the link to KAYPRO4.ZIP which was apparently
broken - it should work now.
Dave
PS: If you would like to return the favor, please send me ImageDisk
images of the Kaypro 4 (83) and Kaypro 10 boot disks as I do not have
them yet.
--
dave04a (at) Dave Dunfield
dunfield (dot) Firmware development services & tools: www.dunfield.com
com Collector of vintage computing equipment:
http://www.parse.com/~ddunfield/museum/index.html
Hi,
Sorry to bother you again. Last time I got a 1650B version 2.xx boot
disk image by asking here. Now I need a 1650A version 1.xx boot disk
image. I would appreciate for help here. Thank you. Yes, I did google
job and I am still doing it.
vax, 9000
New updates have been made to the Little Orphan Tomy Tutor site. The Tomy
Tutor is an American home computer released ca. 1983 with strong hardware
commonalities to the TI 99/4A. The Little Orphan focuses on the American
Tomy Tutor, along with its Japanese cousins (the Pyuuta series), and offers
a catalogue of hardware and software, programming information, technical
documentation and links to related sites.
Here's what's new or changed:
- Pyuuta Jr. entry, featuring a complete description of this Japanese console
version -- yes, I finally got one! Includes pictures, scans from the manual,
and screen grabs of its surprisingly robust and user-friendly interface
(for 1983, that is).
- Stub entry for the Grandstand Tutors, the vanishingly rare UK variant.
- New emulation section. This includes a special section on using the MESS
Tomy Tutor driver (focused more towards the Mac, since I'm a Mac user, but
with help for Windows users as well) and needed firmware and dumps, intended
only for those with a legal right to the hardware, of course. Also includes
TutorEm, the first true emulator (Windows-only), and incorporates Tutti as
a museum piece (though people who do not own a Tomy Tutor can still use it
to legally simulate the Tutor without ROMs). Alas, with this site release,
I have chosen to officially freeze Tutti, the first Tomy Tutor simulator of
any kind, at 0.3. It will still be left for download indefinitely because of
its unique legal status, however.
- Updated Incomplete Catalogue. Improved screenshots for many games, new shots
for many more (including the believed-unreleased Gajigoji and Jack In The
Box), and additional stub entries for hardware to come later. All of the
American clone games have also been matched up to the Japanese originals.
Also included links for the MSX and CoCo ports!
- Additional Pyuuta screen shots.
- Updated my personal trade list and the General and Pyuuta pages' histories,
and made various custodial changes.
Have fun!
http://www.floodgap.com/retrobits/tomy/
/ READY
--
---------------------------------- personal: http://www.armory.com/~spectre/ --
Cameron Kaiser, Floodgap Systems Ltd * So. Calif., USA * ckaiser at floodgap.com
-- My opinions may have changed, but not the fact that I'm still right. -------
Up at Apex today, this is what I saw, part 1:
http://wps.com/temp/CMC1.jpghttp://wps.com/temp/CMC2.jpghttp://wps.com/temp/CMC3.jpg
It's a 12-bit machine, but big odd non-DEC-looking boards. It's
7400 TTL, with 1974 and 1973 dated-coded chips.
Both machines are ruined. Sacked in mud, probably for a decade.
Little rust though, looks like damp, then blown-in dust or silt.
Boards are possibly recoverable.
No memory or any accessories within 10 feet, I think they were
buried under junk and just unearthed (Don is going through the
yard).
The switch register is 12 bits, and a LINK light, so I assume
it's a pdp8 clone. Could be wrong of course.
As long as the subject of Datapoint has come up, I'd like to ask
that people keep an eye out for 2200 and related service manuals.
Several people are trying to restore them right now, and locating
the service docs has been difficult. I would assume they're of the
same detail as the one I have for the 3300 terminal.
>
>Subject: Datapoint 3300 and DEC VT06 terminals
> From: "Michael Holley" <swtpc6800 at comcast.net>
> Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2005 09:25:08 -0700
> To: <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
>
>I am doing a bit of research on Computer Terminal Corporation terminals and
>I am looking for a picture of the Datapoint 3300. I understand that CTC
>OEMed the terminal to many companies. I have found references to the VT06
>being the same as the Datapoint 3300. I also found a HP document that list
>the HP 2600A as be compatible with the 3300. Can anyone clarify this.
>
>The designer of the SWTPC CT-1024 Terminal, Ed Colle, had worked at
>Datapoint on video terminals.
>
>My area of interest is SWTPC 6800 computers and they have an interesting
>connection with Datapoint. Both were located in San Antonio, Texas. When
>SWTPC selected a computer to run their business they selected a Datapoint
>2200. They liked the way the machine booted up and did not require a front
>panel with switches. The SWTPC 6800 did not have front panel switches and
>lights. It booted up with a monitor ROM.
>
>I have some interesting notes from Gary Kay, the designer of the SWTPC 6800
>here. (And a good photo of the Datapoint 2200)
>http://www.swtpc.com/mholley/History/SWTPC_History.htm
>
>Michael Holley
>From a pure economic point of view the front pannel was a very expensive
addition and for the micro world it easily doubled (or more) the hardware
for a base system. Additionally the hardware was both bulky (switches) and
even in volume costly.
SWTP by going with a rom monitor made a simpler machine with fewer parts. The
cost to produce was lower and they also gained in that when roms, and other
digital parts became cheaper they could pass the saving or reap the profit
where switches and leds didn't drop in cost nearly as fast. There were a
bunch of subtle evolutionary ideas in the SWTP systems that were widely adopted
such as standard IO types and addresses. The effect being the user was
less likely to have to configure the hardware and more likely to find new
software [especially for similar but not identical systems] that were compatable.
All of this was an outgrowth of how Motorola supported the 6800 vs Intel
vision.
The offset was with a front pannel troubleshooting a sick system was often
easier but was an expensive artifact when not needed.
Even though 6800 and 6502 based systems where not my forte' I studied them
early on to see why they were so pervasive and largely successful. I feel
that their break with the front pannel concept was a jump ahead for them.
As a result the next system (ca1977) I'd gone with was a NS* horizon to get
away from the switches followed closely with Netronics Explorer8085 for the
resident rom monitor for S100 diagnostic abilities.
Allison
