Doug:
> Never had a problem with Debian, other than its name...
> Is it an acronym for something?
It's rather lame, but:
"Since many people have asked, Debian is pronounced 'deb ee n'. It comes
from the names of the creator of Debian, Ian Murdock, and his wife, Debra."
<shrug> :)
However, you can get Linux-based Debian distributions such as "Corel", "Storm",
"Progeny", and such. The Debian package system and architecture is not tied
explicitly to the official Debian project (and debatable policies) alone.
Chris:
> the Debian people have better things to do with their time than debate,
> argue about, and perhaps eventually fix it.
This is possible, but if you offered a reasonable and serious rebuttal to
their policy (or portions thereof), I would doubt that anybody would think
twice before taking it into consideration. In other words, if you have
something to say, it would help to tell it to the people who can do something
about it! :)
--
Ryan Underwood, <nemesis at icequake.net>, icq=10317253
This has been spoken for..
--
--- David A Woyciesjes
--- C & IS Support Specialist
--- Yale University Press
--- mailto:david.woyciesjes@yale.edu
--- (203) 432-0953
--- ICQ # - 905818
Mac OS X 10.1.2 - Darwin Kernel Version 5.2: Fri Dec 7 21:39:35 PST 2001
Running since 01/22/2002 without a crash
> ----------
> From: David Woyciesjes
>
> This reminds me... I have here an Applied Engineering AEHD 3.5"
> External disk drive for Apple Computers. But the machine it's from is long
> gone.
> Who wants it? Say, $20 for me to pack it and ship it out.
>
> --
> --- David A Woyciesjes
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Richard Erlacher [mailto:edick@idcomm.com]
> They are toys, since they didn't have a disk interface in
> them. They, in
> fact, if your description is correct, needed a toy interface
> to talk to
> another toy interface that talked to what was probably a
> smarter computer that
> had a disk interface in it.
That pretty much describes commodore disk drives, yep. The
point, though, is that they plug directly into an interface
that's already on the machine, so we would get into the sticky
discussion of how "directly" a drive must be handled. Require
too much of the logic to be in the computer, and suddenly an
external IDE disk wouldn't count.
As an aside, I've heard of interesting things being done with
the disk drive "computers," though I can't think of any off hand.
They spoke a pretty simple serial protocol, too, such that you
can basically plug them into other systems (Intel Linux machines,
at least) and build simple applications to talk to them, and they
handled all of the complexities of disk I/O, so that the CPU didn't
need to -- so there are good points to them.
That being said, if I understand your other post properly, once
the drive is there, you would possibly not consider it a toy
any more, whether the drive is external or not, and regardless
of how it's driven. Or am I way off?
Would you also have considered 9-track tape "mass storage" for the
time?
Chris
Christopher Smith, Perl Developer
Amdocs - Champaign, IL
/usr/bin/perl -e '
print((~"\x95\xc4\xe3"^"Just Another Perl Hacker.")."\x08!\n");
'
We're cleaning here, and got some stuff being tossed.
Free, Come pick it up...
12 old modems - Gandalf LDS125 (?)
about 12 (?) dozen tape reels. 12" diameter. They're in 4 15" monitor
boxes...
2 HP LaserJet IID, with duplex
1 HP LaserJet IIID, w/ duplex
some long comms(?) cables
old Epson line printers
old DeskJet printers
CSU/DSU
more to come...
I can hold some of the smaller things, but there is limited space in my
garage.
E-mail me directly...
--
--- David A Woyciesjes
--- C & IS Support Specialist
--- Yale University Press
--- mailto:david.woyciesjes@yale.edu
--- (203) 432-0953
--- ICQ # - 905818
Mac OS X 10.1.2 - Darwin Kernel Version 5.2: Fri Dec 7 21:39:35 PST 2001
Running since 01/22/2002 without a crash
Peter,
I've had this concern myself and have even made processor choices based
on my fear of the hand prototyping of BGA parts.
Would you please give us a synopsis of your experience and tips hand
assembling BGA parts, including tools, temperatures, etc. ?
--tnx
--tom
At 12:46 PM 4/25/02 -0700, you wrote:
>On Thu, 25 Apr 2002, Jos Dreesen wrote:
>
>> Allison wrote:
>> >
>> >almost impossible for the home builder ... and only the odd few (Tony?
:-)
>> >
>> > Impossible? How?
>> >
>> Open any GSM phone and look at the components....
>> There is NO WAY a hobbyist (not even Tony ( sorry chap !)) will be able to
>> handle 200-300 pin BGA packages, with 0.8 or even 0.5mm pitch.
>
>Nonsense! I do 388 pin BGAs for protos all the time with nothing but a hot
air
>gun...
>
>BGAs are easier than fine pitch QFP to solder (though difficult to salvage if
>done wrong...)
>
>Peter Wallace
>
>
>
>
On April 22, Richard Erlacher wrote:
> Most of the people I've met who use UNIX/LINUX in their home-computing
> pursuits do it because they've nothing better to do. You may not fit that
> model, but these guys figure out ways to make their computers more secure,
> more complicated to use, and often have to type for several minutes to find
> out whether a copy of a file on their local hard drive is available on that
> other box down the wire. When my machines are all turned on, I can do that in
> less than 15 seconds, and that long only because I can't remember the file
> name.
This is the one of your trolls that I think I'll ignore.
> I just want (1) for my computers to act in concert to present me with a
> convenient interface and (2) for them to work as expected. They seem to do
> that most of the time. In recent years my cars have been more reliable than
> my computers, but that wasn't the case some years back when I used Detroit
> iron. When my computers become as reliable as my telephone, which may happen
> not because the computers get better but ... then I'll be happy enough, I
I suppose I'm more demanding than to accept my computers working as
expected "most of the time". My computers are much MORE reliable than
my telephone. But then, I don't use PeeCees, and I don't run Windows.
I suppose it's just an issue of personal/professional standards and
expectations. If I had a hammer that randomly jumped off of my
workbench and flew through a window, I'd throw it in the trash and get
a better hammer. I did exactly that with my computer a very long time
ago.
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire "Mmmm. Big."
St. Petersburg, FL -Den
On Apr 24, 21:05, Bill Pechter wrote:
> Isn't it a bit much to call XXDP+ an OS.
> DECX-11 is closer... XXDP's pretty dumb.
I've always thought of XXDP as the OS that DECX-11 runs under.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
> From: Andy Holt <andyh(a)andyh-rayleigh.freeserve.co.uk>
> > Nowadays You typically have to deal with distributors - little
> > problem for the experienced, but an obstacle to newcomers
>
> what about JDR, JAMECO, BG and a long list of suppliers that take
> small orders and credit cards?
Great for processors, logic gates, linear chips, etc... DigiKey
I do lots of business with (well, in the past).
But try finding:
cross-bar switch
telco line interface
bond-out version of a processor
caller-id decoder
and any other number of specialized chips...
-dq
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dwight K. Elvey [mailto:dwightk.elvey@amd.com]
> Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 12:39 PM
> To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org
> Subject: Re: .I.P. for D.I.Y.
>
>
> I get a kick out of the fact that he made the electrodes
> in the shape of the old atom symbol they used to use in
> the advertisements. Does anyone remember the name of the
> little cartoon character that the GE advertisements had
> for the atom?
> Dwight
>
>
Reddy Kilowatt!
************************************
If this email is not intended for you, or you are not responsible for the
delivery of this message to the addressee, please note that this message may
contain ITT Privileged/Proprietary Information. In such a case, you may not
copy or deliver this message to anyone. You should destroy this message and
kindly notify the sender by reply email. Information contained in this
message that does not relate to the business of ITT is neither endorsed by
nor attributable to ITT.
************************************
> From: Doc <doc(a)mdrconsult.com>
> :
> You're calling the entire DECstation 5000/2xx line "products intended
> for the toy market as opposed to one intended to be seen as a computer",
> since they have no internal mass storage.
I guess he thinks Sun 3/50's are toys too. Sigh.
Al.