VT55 with integrated printer
Not thermal or electrostatic
>From 1977 until about 1980 we actually used the terminals to print graphics
>from bacterial growth curves. The paper exited the side of the terminal.
We usually attached a weighted paper clamp to help pull the paper out of the
printer. The printer was placed so the paper hung down off the side of the
desk or table. The paper was initially wet and came in foil enclosed rolls.
The printer generated a spark to discolor the paper …
[View More]at the correct spot,
kind of a brownish printing. The paper didn't work if it was dry. Also
there was a problem with fungus growth on opened rolls of paper that weren't
used for a long time. Maybe caused by the microbiology lab environment.
Speed of the paper motion was important, nothing like looking at plots with
varied plot speed, scrunched graphs.
Picture of the internals of the printer is at
http://vt100.net/docs/vt5c-op/
Picture of the printer with the paper hanging out the side is
http://vt100.net/docs/vt55e-tm/
Mike McFadden
mmcfadden(a)cmh.edu
At 02:23 PM 3/5/02 -0800, you wrote:
>
>--- John Chris Wren <jcwren(a)jcwren.com> wrote:
>> This sounds like a machine I used to work on. PDP-8/a, two floppy
>> drives, a VT-50 terminal that looked like it could have been provisioned
>> for an internal thermal printer, and ours had a LA-36.
>
>Yep... they sold a bunch of them. The printer inside the VT-50 case
>wasn't thermal, BTW. The "1976-1977 pdp-8/a minicomputer handbook" calls
>it an "electrolytic copier" under the entry for the VT-61. My memory of
>working with them was that they used funky paper and there was a wet
>wiper brush that moistened the paper as it exited the printer. Perhaps
>it squeegeed it. I don't recall any more.
>
[View Less]
> Sadly, though, glow plugs do little to keep the oil thin enough to
keep
> from really hard cold starts. Especially back in the old days when
> multi-weight oils really weren't. It always cranked, that wasn't a problem.
> It was tearing up the cylinder walls until the molasses, er, oil could be
> circulated.
I'd suggest trying Mobile One synthetic oil... if it can find
leaks that no other oil can find on your engine, it should be
alble to flow into all the places oil needs to go...
-dq
On March 6, Jeff Hellige wrote:
> >> Openstep 4.2 still supports the black hardware though most
> >> people I've known running NeXT hardware have been running NS 3.3.
> >> This could partly be due to Apple giving it away to NeXT hardware
> >> owners in '99.
> >
> > It probably has a lot more to do with the fact that 4.x on black
> >hardware is slower than pissing tar.
>
> I've never tried Openstep on the black hardware. Is it …
[View More]that
> much slower than NS 3.3?
Unbelievably so, yes.
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire
St. Petersburg, FL "Less talk. More synthohol." --Lt. Worf
[View Less]
On March 5, Jeff Hellige wrote:
> Openstep 4.2 still supports the black hardware though most
> people I've known running NeXT hardware have been running NS 3.3.
> This could partly be due to Apple giving it away to NeXT hardware
> owners in '99.
It probably has a lot more to do with the fact that 4.x on black
hardware is slower than pissing tar.
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire
St. Petersburg, FL "Less talk. More synthohol." --Lt. Worf
I have a lead on a PDP 7 coming out of service in the Portland Oregon area.
I hope to go look at it on March 19th or 20th. I believe it is still plugged
in but out of service. I think it is a late '60s machine.
Anyone interested in it please contact me at whoagiii(a)aol.com, not on the
list please. I am not interested in getting it. I think that there are very
few out there and any left need rescue.
I will take pictures when I get a chance to look at it. I would like info on
what to look …
[View More]for when I look at the machine.
Paxton Hoag
[View Less]
On March 5, Doc wrote:
> > It probably has a lot more to do with the fact that 4.x on black
> > hardware is slower than pissing tar.
>
> My cat is glaring at me. From _way_ under the desk.
>
> "Damn you, Dave McGuire!"
SCORE! hehehe
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire
St. Petersburg, FL "Less talk. More synthohol." --Lt. Worf
I've got a loaded uVAX II in a BA123, available here in Austin, TX.
CPU: KA630-AA
two DHV11M multiport serial cards
one DHQ11M (8line QBus Async serial card)
one DEQNAM QBus etheret adapter
one TK50 tape drive
has two "H3100" ports for serial breakout boxes on the back; not sure
if these are connected to the DHV11Ms or the DHQ11M.
Unknown RAM/storage; I havent had time to take the machine out of the back of
my truck.
The front panel covering the storage control buttons is missing; …
[View More]I have the
"back flap" cover, but the plastic "hinge" will need to be replaced.
Would like to trade for smaller VAX (VAXstation VLC, etc) or later-model
(73,83,93, etc) PDP-11 system. WILL NOT SHIP. You gotta come pick it up
at my house. 8-)
Also have a BC23K 15-pin-to-1BNC mono monitor cable, free...
Bill
--
Bill Bradford
mrbill(a)mrbill.net
Austin, TX
[View Less]
> From: "Jay West" <jwest(a)classiccmp.org>
> To: <classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org>
> Subject: Re: Symbolics rescue (question about picture)
> Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2002 16:06:04 -0600
> Reply-To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org
>
> For nostalgic reasons, I have wanted to acquire two particular disk drives
> for a PDP-11 of mine... I don't remember what they are called or what brand.
> But - there are two of them in the very far right of the symbolics rescue
> …
[View More]picture at the top of the rack with light brown trim line across the front.
> Can anyone tell me what those are - and if there are any around to be
> obtained? How hard are they to work on? Is the positioner based on patterns
> on the drive or a glass reticule?
They look like DEC RK03's to me. Predecessor to the RK05, and actually
re-badged drives from some other manufacturer, the name of which escapes
me at the moment. RK05's used a glass reticule for positioning. I think
that on-disk format tracks came with the first "Winchester" sealed drives.
carl
--
carl lowenstein marine physical lab u.c. san diego
clowenstein(a)ucsd.edu
[View Less]
> Where has rail been ripped up? I've never heard of that happening. Is
> it a national trend?
>
> Chad Fernandez
> Michigan, USA
We've had quite a lot ripped out here in Oregon.
Zane
On March 5, Doc wrote:
> > First I've heard of it. It primarily ran on NeXT hardware (of course), x86
> > systems, and had limited support for HP and Sparc. I've *never* heard VMS
> > mentioned as having any sort of an OPENSTEP environment.
>
> We are talking about OpenSTEP, right? Not NeXTSTEP? There has
> been a port of OpenSTEP to XFree86 for long and long.
NeXTSTEP by any other name...
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire
St. Petersburg, FL "Less talk. …
[View More]More synthohol." --Lt. Worf
[View Less]