> but I did learn that
>a period at the end of a sentence is followed by two spaces, for example.
This is actually a now outdated custom. I think it was originally there
as old type presses has a small space character, so two were needed to
make decent enough room to tell a sentence ended. I think it carried over
to original typwriters, and then into early word processing... but now,
it is outdated, and no longer taught (at least not by newer typing
teachers... I bet the nuns at my wife's old highschool still teach two
spaces).
Of course, it could also have been dropped out of laziness, and just
changed out of force from the new generation just not bothering with a
2nd space. (I think that is why standard office attire has relaxed so
much too... new generation of bosses that don't take as much pride in
their work appearance... not that I am one to talk, since I always wear
jeans and a shirt to work except for days I have to meet with clients)
>If you insist on writing in a style reminiscent of E. E. Cummings poetry
Ugh.. try reading William Faulkner (I am pretty sure that is who it
was)... he has 3 page run on sentences... worst reading my poor dyslexic
brain ever had to deal with.
-chris
<http://www.mythtech.net>
chris
writing an idea about a hobby is not an art form. that is my point.
you only need precision when you need it. like standing in a karate
stance when there is no one to fight. you get in the stance when needed.
same with precision. pick your spots.
has no one ever heard of that.
pick the battles you fight.
you dont have to fight all of them; just the ones that matter.
same with percision.
if someone says good morning and you dont understand them.
you may inquired as to what they said. but after that one inquiry
if it is not clear what they said , it really doesnt matter because
what they may have been saying wasnt important enough to
grill them for an hour.
some one said the post didnt warrant a response.
he was correct. i was just talking about an idea.
thats it. it was not important.
joee
Does anybody have a copy of this? I have MS OS/2 1.3, and I have
TCP/IP for OS/2 1.3 EE, but they don't work together. I'd love to have
EE so I can put TCP/IP on it and install the lot on a 286. Maybe I can
dig up a web server for it. :)
Thanks!
--James B.
> > From: Douglas Quebbeman <dhquebbeman(a)theestopinalgroup.com>
>
> > Heh. Mexican speed wrench...
>
> Funny, I've always heard it referred to as a *Kentucky* speed
> wrench ;>)
I like that even better! But down yonder, they have
to be carefull with them, after all, they *really*
hurt when they're dropped on bare feet...
;)
-dq
! From: Richard Erlacher [mailto:edick@idcomm.com]
!
......
!
! Microsoft Outlook and Outlook Express have a setting which
! will limit the
! width of lines that it transmits and receives. While it lets
! you type to
! the width of your display, it wraps lines by inserting "> "
! or whatever else
! you choose, at the left margin of quoted received text, and
! <crlf> at the
! limits you set. After a few iterations, quoted text becomes
! quite difficult
! to read, and more so if it's formatted both manually and
! automatically.
Yep, I have to manually tweak messages as I reply to them (see below)... I
must be doing okay, though. No one has yelled at me yet...
! >
! > I am aware, and I do try to avoid it. As I've said in a
! private mail to
! someone,
! > my company believes that everyone should use microshaft outhouse for
! email. I'm
! > really lucky to have gotten it to send messages in ASCII :/
! Never mind
! wrapping
! > the lines. So I do it by hand, when I remember and when
! I'm not rushed.
! >
! > Regards,
! >
! > Chris
--- David A Woyciesjes
--- C & IS Support Specialist
--- Yale University Press
--- mailto:david.woyciesjes@yale.edu
--- (203) 432-0953
--- ICQ # - 905818
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Richard Erlacher [mailto:edick@idcomm.com]
> Microsoft Outlook and Outlook Express have a setting which
> will limit the
> width of lines that it transmits and receives. While it lets
News to me. I'll see if I can find it.
Chris
Christopher Smith, Perl Developer
Amdocs - Champaign, IL
/usr/bin/perl -e '
print((~"\x95\xc4\xe3"^"Just Another Perl Hacker.")."\x08!\n");
'
On Jan 4, 1:07, Carlini, Antonio wrote:
> Actually I only know of one other in the UK,
> but I expect there are a few more lurking in
> dark corners.
I have a VT78. Is that the one you're thinking of?
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
Hmmm.. okay. Well, my Outlook2001 (sorry, no choice at work) must've read it
correctly, and not as an attachment...
--- David A Woyciesjes
--- C & IS Support Specialist
--- Yale University Press
--- mailto:david.woyciesjes@yale.edu
--- (203) 432-0953
--- ICQ # - 905818
! -----Original Message-----
! From: Russ Blakeman [mailto:rhblakeman@kih.net]
! Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 1:03 PM
! To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org
! Subject: RE: Language and English
!
!
! The one that he had attached to his messages, ATTxxxx.DAT - it's a PGP
! signature from his last email.
!
! -----Original Message-----
! From: owner-classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org
! [mailto:owner-classiccmp@classiccmp.org]On Behalf Of David Woyciesjes
! Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 11:50 AM
! To: 'classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org'; 'Richard Erlacher'
! Subject: RE: Language and English
!
!
! ! From: Richard Erlacher
! !
! ! It's never safe to open an attachment to an otherwise
! undefined email.
! !
! ! I'd suspect only two or three on this list will be foolish
! ! enough to open
! ! this one.
! !
! ! Dick
!
! Huh? What attachment?
!
! --- David A Woyciesjes
! --- C & IS Support Specialist
! --- Yale University Press
! --- mailto:david.woyciesjes@yale.edu
! --- (203) 432-0953
! --- ICQ # - 905818
!
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ian Koller [mailto:vze2mnvr@verizon.net]
> Are you aware that your messages seem to have no
> carriage returns and don't wrap in some message
> viewers? Please don't take this as a complaint,
> but this makes it more difficult to read, as I
> have to scroll horizontally outside the normal
> message viewing area. And it seems your messages
> are worth reading as they contain some thoughtful
> comment.
I am aware, and I do try to avoid it. As I've said in a private mail to someone,
my company believes that everyone should use microshaft outhouse for email. I'm
really lucky to have gotten it to send messages in ASCII :/ Never mind wrapping
the lines. So I do it by hand, when I remember and when I'm not rushed.
Regards,
Chris
Christopher Smith, Perl Developer
Amdocs - Champaign, IL
/usr/bin/perl -e '
print((~"\x95\xc4\xe3"^"Just Another Perl Hacker.")."\x08!\n");
'
! From: Fred Cisin (XenoSoft) [mailto:cisin@xenosoft.com]
!
!
! On Tue, 1 Jan 2002, Chris wrote:
! > I know the facts, and I know exactly why it carries that
! > name (much like
!
! It's a nice analogy, but only partially relevant for this particular
! issue.
! I don't know what they're teaching kids these days, but in
! the time period
! for which this list is relevant, mechanics did/do indeed refer to any
! adjustable wrench of that particular design as a "Crescent
! Wrench". They
! do NOT use the term "Crescent Wrench" to refer to any other style of
! adjustable wrench, and would consider THAT misuse as comparable to
! referring to a box-end wrench as a "socket".
Maybe I'm dating myself, or just sounding stupid, but with my basic
hands-on mechanic experience, I always called them 'adjustable' wrenches,
because that's what they did. They adjusted to the size you nedd.
Never quite realized what exactly a Cresent wrench was...
--- David A Woyciesjes
--- C & IS Support Specialist
--- Yale University Press
--- mailto:david.woyciesjes@yale.edu
--- (203) 432-0953
--- ICQ # - 905818