> -----Original Message-----
> From: Golemancd(a)aol.com [mailto:Golemancd@aol.com]
> i look at the mail and see an ad for something and i know
> im not interested , so i dont worry about which store
> is sending this junk to me. [trash can time]
Actually, depending on the annoyance factor I do check the name of the store, and adjust my shopping preferences accordingly (favoring other stores, or if it's junk email, not dealing with the company at all).
Usually, though, it just gets ignored, you're right.
Regards,
Chris
Christopher Smith, Perl Developer
Amdocs - Champaign, IL
/usr/bin/perl -e '
print((~"\x95\xc4\xe3"^"Just Another Perl Hacker.")."\x08!\n");
'
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Golemancd(a)aol.com [mailto:Golemancd@aol.com]
> i collect any computer i can get my hands on.
You must have lots of room. I'm getting to the point where I have to refuse to take peesees in some cases (err -- sometimes, regardless of the case. ;).
> i am developing an operating system and a multimedia program
> to create movies.
Are we talking about video editing, rendering, animation, SuperDuperMegaMultiCompoundApp, or what?
> i use a newer computer to produce records.
> i am also working out, as i was talking about
> in the original thread that got off track, a distributed
> os to control robots and also a custom computer
> to do the same.
Now, I can't particularly think of a situation in robotics that would require a distributed O/S. Usually it's general-purpose embedded systems at a maximum. What are you up to here?
Or is it just distributed for cool factor? (Nothing wrong with that...)
This part is likely to even be on topic ;)
Regards,
Chris
Christopher Smith, Perl Developer
Amdocs - Champaign, IL
/usr/bin/perl -e '
print((~"\x95\xc4\xe3"^"Just Another Perl Hacker.")."\x08!\n");
'
I'm wanting to buy a Tiger Learning Computer from anyone who may have one
they don't want. This was the kid computer released during Christmas of
1996 but only sold in limited numbers in the JC Penney 1996 Christmas
catalog. It was Apple ][ compatible--it basically had enhanced Apple //e
ROMs and used Flash ROM cards as an emulated Disk ][ drive. It had
Appleworks built-in. Very nifty.
I'm also open to trades. Any got one?
This is my biggest want currently.
:)
Sellam Ismail Vintage Computer Festival
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
International Man of Intrigue and Danger http://www.vintage.org
* Old computing resources for business and academia at www.VintageTech.com *
! From: Lawrence Walker [mailto:lgwalker@mts.net]
!
! And then there is "Leatherman" the modern eqivalent of the
! "Swiss Army Knife" of which there is no eqivalent I know
! qualitywise altho the quality is declining as demand increases.
!
! Lawrence
Well, about 3 years ago, I got the Buck Knives Co. version of the
Leatherman, called the "BuckTool". (Duh, real creative name there...)
http://www.buckknives.com/products/details.php?ID=64
Still strong, hasn't loosened up at all. Great thing to have around on your
belt. Especially for emergency work on computers...
The quality of that is at least as good as the Leatherman. IMHO the
design, on the other hand, is definitely better. Especially when it is opend
to the 'pliers' position...
--- David A Woyciesjes
--- C & IS Support Specialist
--- Yale University Press
--- mailto:david.woyciesjes@yale.edu
--- (203) 432-0953
--- ICQ # - 905818
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Golemancd(a)aol.com [mailto:Golemancd@aol.com]
> does anyone have anything to say about computers?
Yes. They're generally digital these days, are they not?
Regards,
Chris
Christopher Smith, Perl Developer
Amdocs - Champaign, IL
/usr/bin/perl -e '
print((~"\x95\xc4\xe3"^"Just Another Perl Hacker.")."\x08!\n");
'
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gooijen H [mailto:GOOI@oce.nl]
> Sent: 04 January 2002 08:42
> To: 'classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org'
> Subject: 11/53 - Qbus backplane question
>
>
> I got in the 11/53 running Micro/RSX.
>
> The 11/53 has an H9278-A backplane. According to
> Megan's fieldguide the first 3 slots are Q22/CD
> and the last 5 slots are Q22.
> What does that mean?
If I remember rightly the CD slots have grant continuity, which means you
can have half height boards in position 1/2 without needing grant continuity
cards in position 3/4 to carry signals over to the next slot. Can't
rememember the M code for the GC card ATM; my VAXen are 10 minutes away from
here.
--
Adrian Graham, Corporate Microsystems Ltd
e: adrian.graham(a)corporatemicrosystems.com
w: www.corporatemicrosystems.com
w2: www.binarydinosaurs.co.uk (Online Computer Museum)
Might be some confusion, so here's how the conversation went, at
least the way I saw it..... (edited for ease of reading...)
> (assuming X11 worked on the Vaxstation 3100
> under Ultrix - I assume it would.)
>
>
! AFAIK the SPX graphics was not supported, only the
! mono and GPX framebuffers.
!
! Jochen Kunz
> So there is some chance of NetBSD/Xwindows running on my
> b&w 3100m38?
>
> David A Woyciesjes
! From: Clint Wolff (VAX collector)
!
! The last I heard, NetBSD didn't support any sort of
! graphics console. Not even as a text only console...
!
! Clint
> So, the monitor and keyboard hooked directly to
> the back of the VAXStation
> 3100 M38 is not a text only console? What kind of console
> is it then?
>
> David A Woyciesjes
! From: Alex White
!
! It could either be mono, or 4- or 8-plane graphics IIRC.
! Designed to run
! DECwindows, there have apparently been two ports of X11 to it under
! NetBSD - see the thread called "x-server and security.tgz for NetBSD
! 1.5" at http://mail-index.netbsd.org/port-vax/2000/11/ for the rough
! info - if you know any more please tell us...
That's what I thought.
Well, what I was trying to say, and maybe not clearly, is my
VAXStation has a black & white graphics. It's currently running NetBSD 1.5
right now, text only, no X11. I have seen it run DECWindows. That was before
work sold it to me and wiped the drives... Grrr... About all I know at the
moment, but hopefully soon I'll have time to contribute to the effort of
creating an XServer for this puppy. :-)
That's where my previous comment came from, the confusion of what
kind of console is on it...
--- David A Woyciesjes
--- C & IS Support Specialist
--- Yale University Press
--- mailto:david.woyciesjes@yale.edu
--- (203) 432-0953
--- ICQ # - 905818
I've got some orders for some goodies and there's still some things left.
Tell me what you want so I can see if I can accomodate you.
--
Antique Computer Virtual Museum
www.nothingtodo.org
On Jan 2, 21:08, <quapla(a)xs4all.nl> wrote:
> Besides some small mistakes (not all PS modules in place for the CPU, and
> not having a powered memory box), we managed to get the machine partly
> running, that is, the lights are reacting to the 2 knob settings, and
some
> data is displayed on the console.
>
> However, when depositing some data at address 1000, nothing happens, and
> the parity and/or address error light goes on. Same when trying to see
> the contents of any (low) address. So, I have a few questions:
I'm sure there must be people on the list who know more about 11/70s than I
do, but since no-one else has replied yet...
Is the memory powered up and connected? At the right address (you must
have some memory in the lowest 28KW to start up)? Is the cache working?
There are various things done by the power-up bootstrap diagnostic
routines to set up the cache and memory system; and there are ways to
disable cache, Unibus map, certain errors, etc, by poking bits into control
registers. And I think you probably want to set the console Address Select
Switch to CONS(ole) PHYS(ical).
> - I have heard about a system address register which sets the size of
> the memory, where is this address located?
17177760 is the "lower size register". Set it to the address of the last
addressable block of 32 words (ie offset by 6 bits). There's an upper size
register as well, "reserved for future use", read-only, reads as zeros, at
17177762.
> - At the back of the memory box, there are somw switches and 4 thumbwheel
> switches. What is their purpose?
I assume to set the base address of the memory in the box, but never having
set one up, I don't know.
> - Is the ROM boot address still 177560? or must it be 17777560 on the
11/70?
Well, it would be 18 bits, since it's on the Unibus, in an M9301-YC or
equivalent. But 177560 (or 777560) is the address of the console serial
line. The bootstrap is at 765000. I'm not sure if you need to set the top
four bits as well, as if I recall correctly, the Unibus is mapped to the
top of physical memory.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York