David Gesswein wrote:
>I plan to have this all done in 25 years so you should be all set :-).
I'm OK with that timescale !
>If you know the UK people need a particular portion of it let me know. I
>don't have the time to scan it all in the near term. Email me the
>request directly, with the list traffic I might miss it.
Actually I only know of one other in the UK,
but I expect there are a few more lurking in
dark corners.
Antonio
> I found a couple of 2MB PS/2 SIMMs that I had stashed away and
> put them in my PS/2 Model 70, so I now have 8MB of RAM. I haven't
> cracked the password on the Xenix386 installation, but thought from
> the discussion that OS/2 would be a better operating system to play
> with anyway. I have OS/2 2.1. Would that be a good choice? If so,
> is there a way to make floppies from the installation CD? I haven't
> messed with OS/2 for a long time.
Well, scratch the idea of OS/2; my CD has a big scratch in it and is
unreadable.
--
Eric Dittman
dittman(a)dittman.net
Check out the DEC Enthusiasts Club at http://www.dittman.net/
I have an MCA SCSI adapter with IBM FRU 11H3600. All I've been
able to find out is this is for either an RS/6000 or a PS/2,
depending on the firmware. I can't find the reference disk on
IBM's web or ftp site, and I can't find any way to tell which
firmware is loaded without the reference disk.
Can anyone help point me to the file?
--
Eric Dittman
dittman(a)dittman.net
Check out the DEC Enthusiasts Club at http://www.dittman.net/
Hi,
I was laid off last november and I am still looking for
work. I am a novell network administrator, and help desk
support person. I have some hardware experience as well.
If the place where you work is hiring my sort of person,
please let me know.
I am also looking for any short term 'warm body' type job
in the San Jose, Sunnyvale, MT. View area.
Thanks!
Sorry for the off topic....
> >Ahh -- so what _do_ you call a guy who hangs around with a bunch of
> >musicians?
>
> A drummer of course (as an ex-percusionist, I heard this joke almost
> daily) :-)
What a relief- I've always heard that "singer" was the punch line...
-dq
p.s. Would Everyone Here Kindly Step to the Rear
And let a TENOR lead the way...
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lawrence Walker [mailto:lgwalker@mts.net]
> And actually force people to learn how to spell without the
> use of a spell-
> checker. I remember how aghast I was when I learned my sons school
Well, in defense of poor spelling, there are more important things -- such as content -- especially on a friendly list such as this. After all, tripe is tripe, no matter how correct the spelling. :)
> allowed the use of calculators in math exams. Right On, Fred.
... and in defense of calculators, it's certainly more important for one to learn the theoretical core of mathematics so that it can be applied to Real Life than to waste time calculating things which are practically useless. The actual calculation is generally a mundane, but necessary step. Provided that you know how it's supposed to work, you can always arrive at the correct answer given some amount of time, with or without a calculator. Please don't take this as a defense of the public school system, which doesn't truthfully teach anything.
> I was going to
> reply to this would-be hacker's input but brushed it off as
> more juvenal crap.
I was tempted to respond too, but -- and this is the whole problem with the message -- there was nothing to which one could respond. He may as well have said "test message -- please ignore."
Regards,
Chris
Christopher Smith, Perl Developer
Amdocs - Champaign, IL
/usr/bin/perl -e '
print((~"\x95\xc4\xe3"^"Just Another Perl Hacker.")."\x08!\n");
'
> From: Golemancd(a)aol.com
> i agree u shouldnt try and read it
> ps notice no capitals and not punctuation
If thumbing your nose at this group makes you feel better it might be to
your advantage
to find out why. Personally, I'm curious as to why anyone would
intentionally make their
postings harder to understand than they have to be.
> doesnt matter anyway
If our understanding your meaning doesn't matter, why post?
> sometimes i forget that computer folks r technical people.
> i come from the arts where the only thing that is needed is
> understanding.
Hmm, I always thought most "art" forms required a modicum of technical
ability.
> i am on stage sometimes and all the musicians do is
> just nod or look at each other and everyone understands them.
What you are referring to is called a "cue." A cue is not a spontaneous,
mystical form
of communication. It is something which is worked out in advance, during
rehearsal,
and it is expected by the recipient.
An example would be a look from a guitarist to a keyboardist which carries
the meaning,
"I'm done with my variable-length solo, so you may now begin your solo."
This may
or may not be actually spoken of in rehearsal, but it is still an
agreed-upon, precise form of communication which is worked out in advance
of the actual performance.
As for "understanding," precision in communication fosters better
understanding.
This has been the entire point of the "Centronics/Crescent wrench" thread.
> will try and and be more precise. i guess here that is needed.
I think most people here would be happy if you just were a little less
sloppy in
your presentation, so that we can get a better idea of what you're trying
to say.
And if we don't like what you're saying we can always call you an ASS and
be
done with it ;>)
Glen
0/0
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Fred Cisin (XenoSoft) [mailto:cisin@xenosoft.com]
> IRRELEVANT.
> The discussion was how to make an Amiga disk using a PC.
> It can not be done with the stock PC hardware.
> Somebody said that it could be done with the stock PC, by using Linux.
> THAT IS WRONG.
Well, you don't have to shout. :) That statement would obviously be incorrect. (I admit that I missed this assertion the first time around) It can _possibly_ be done with a modified peesee, and it can probably be done with a couple of other machines unmodified (but still using linux and the normal floppy drivers).
> The "standard linux floppy disk driver" will operate the
> Catweasel card?
> (It is NOT a floppy disk controller in terms of BIOS level
> interaction.)
I was under the impression that it would drive a catweasel card. I was not aware that the card was significantly different than other (normal peesee) floppy interfaces, though, so perhaps I got the wrong idea from somewhere.
On the other hand, the linux "floppy driver" is, as I understand it, actually a collection of drivers, and the same code-base may actually be used to handle all manner of strange disk/drive setups.
> Or
> The "standard linux floppy disk driver" will do stuff that is
> impossible
> with the PC hardware, without needing the Catweasel?
Obviously not. :) Well, not if you're running linux on "PC hardware." If you're running linux on, for instance, a Macintosh, it will read and write 400 and 800k mac disks, which is impossible on "PC hardware." ;) (Let's not get into that again, though...)
> It WOULD be possible to write a floppy disk driver for Linux
> that could
> make use of the Catweasel. But it has, apparently NOT been done, and
> therefore suggestions of USING that are inappropriate.
True enough, and as I said, I've heard of no special catweasel driver; just that linux would operate the catweasel controller. Since I don't have a catweasel, I can't really verify that.
> > Or ... one could write an amiga filesystem for linux. I actually
> > wonder why this hasn't been done.
> For use with linux on an Amiga?
No, for use with hard disks, SCSI removable media, and the like, which could likely be transported without trouble.
> Or are you trying to say that writing an amiga filesystem for
> Linux, would
> permit a PC running Linux to read and write Amiga disksettes without
> special hardware?
Well, for all I know, Amiga may have had a 1.44MB format which could work, but that's just a guess, based on the fact that Apple's works fine.
> Could you also write one for NorthStar-DOS? (hard-sectored)
Given a hard sectored drive, I would guess... (Or what about putting a soft-sector drive in the NorthStar?)
It's a pretty normal format otherwise, right?
> How about one for Apple-DOS? (GCR)
That's more difficult.
> How about one that reads 8" diskettes in a 5.25" drive?
> (Maybe trimming
> the edges, and not being able to read some outer tracks :-)
Actually you might be able to get by with it in a high density drive, given some way of attaching the disk to the "spindle" of the drive, and provided that you didn't really want to keep the disk anyway (or possibly the drive!), and if you were willing to write mind-numbingly useless special-purpose software. Otherwise, I hear that CompatiCard will drive an 8" floppy ;)
Regards,
Chris
Christopher Smith, Perl Developer
Amdocs - Champaign, IL
/usr/bin/perl -e '
print((~"\x95\xc4\xe3"^"Just Another Perl Hacker.")."\x08!\n");
'
> From: Douglas Quebbeman <dhquebbeman(a)theestopinalgroup.com>
> Heh. Mexican speed wrench...
Funny, I've always heard it referred to as a *Kentucky* speed wrench ;>)
Glen
0/0
In a message dated 31/12/01 Tony Duell writes
>> Most of the engineers I work with have never heard of Amphenol or Cannon,
>Then I would suggest you're working with engineers who are not
> particularly knowledgable about practical electronics. If they're (say)
> mechanical engineers or civil engineers, then no problem. If they claim
> to tbe electronic engineers I'd probably dispute that claim.
I agree, last year they couldn't even build a set of LED Christmas tree lights
without blowing them up, never heard of constant current drive !!! I'm not
talking
about graduates straight out of college but people who've been in industry
for a
few years. In the engineering department I work in there is only ONE other
true
practical engineer who lays out his own PCBs, is keen to learn about new and
emerging technologies etc. He is, like myself, mostly self taught, and has a
passion for this stuff - a rare breed these days. But there we are - pay
peanuts
and get monkies.
> Far too many courses (in all aspects of science and engineering) miss out
> the simple practical stuff. Without which the complicated stuff is
essentially
> useless..
Agreed, I believe any so called engineer should have a practical "hands on"
experience in both hardware and software, after all if they don't understand
the
basics they are of little use.
>> On the subject of D-sub connectors I've sometimes come across some with
>> metric threaded jackscrews instead of the usual UNF thread, or is it UNC ?
> I thought it was 4-40 UNC....
Thanks Tony, wasn't sure of the thread.
> FWIW, the stnadard for HPIB jackscrews is M3.5 (metric). I've had to make
> such parts on occasions. One HP manual I was reading recently said that
> the instrument used metric screws on the connectors, and that a
> conversion kit (presumably consisting of 2 jackscrews) was available for
> converting older HPIB cables. So I assume that the original HPIB used UNC
> jackscrews (probably 6-32).
One day I will have to do a search for the original IEEE-488 standard just to
see what they specify. I suspect that jackscrew threads are not part of the
standard.
Chris
> Since I've got a nice Pro380 with a few options, such as the
> decna adapter, what would be the most flexible setup for this
> machine? I'd really like to work with this machine but am not too
> impressed with POS.
>
> Jeff
You've got a DECNA for it? Wow! Lucky bum!
I'd say your best choice for an OS would be RT-11 with the free TCP/IP
stack. In fact I think that's about the only way you'll be able to use the
DECNA interface.
Zane
> The DECNA isn't too useful outside of a DECnet then? Does
> RT-11 support the RD-52? I know that the docs for Venix state that
> there's a problem with using Venix and the RD-52 together. How hard
> is it to get the RX-50 disks of RT-11 and to straighten out all the
> licensing issues?
Can you get DECnet for POS? Good luck getting it for RT-11, and even if you
do, I don't know if it would support the DECNA. RT-11 shouldn't have any
problem with RD52's.
As for the RX50's of RT-11 and licensing issues, that's the tricky part.
You probably don't want to know what a license costs.
Zane
Well, I just wanted to thank you all for suggesting Teledisk and
prodding me into setting up a system that will let me archive my iPDS
(Intel Personal Development System) diskettes. As background, this
computer uses a 96tpi, double sided 5.25" diskette drive. That amounts
to approximately 640k of storage, without my calculating it exactly.
Teledisk 2.12 works on that format using a 1.2M HD drive, and it seems
to work perfectly. I made a system diskette image and recreated a
workable diskette from the image.
For me, finding a system with a 5.25" drive was the challenge. I
realized in this process that I didn't have any at my house, but I had
several old Zenith SupersPort, SupersPort 286, and SupersPort SX
laptops. They can access an external drive and I had some Zenith
external drives. Unfortunately Zenith never marketed anything but a
48tpi (360k Bytes) drive. Tonight I was able to figure out the
jumpering for that drive and put a 1.2M HD drive into that package and
make it work with Teledisk.
In a former life I had used Teledisk and forgotten how useful it was.
Anyway, the point of this post is to offer anyone who would like them
images of system diskettes for the Intel iPDS. I have CP/M 2.2 straight
>from Intel, CP/M 2.2 with my enhanced BIOS, ISIS-PDS (Intel's operating
system), and many ISIS applications (like the EPROM software, IPPS). I
would be happy to e-mail anyone the Teledisk images from anything that I
have for that machine. Just ask me privately for what you'd like. I
think I even have a CP/M Plus that I implemented for that system. All
you would need is Teledisk and a system with a 1.2M HD drive to recreate
bootable diskettes for the iPDS.
And to Sellam, I know I told you I'd mail you diskettes. This is to ask
if you'd prefer images. You'll get them faster. ;-)
--
Dave Mabry dmabry(a)mich.com
Dossin Museum Underwater Research Team
NACD #2093
> If a PC cannot, can a mac do it? I've got a performa or quadra just waiting
> to do something here.
No.
However, a PC with a Catweasel board can.
Zane
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ben Franchuk [mailto:bfranchuk@jetnet.ab.ca]
> OK what was the AMIGA that ran both AMIGA and PC software ... (286 +
> 68000 )
> cpu cards on a PC style box. Did that have a special software to write
> PC disks?
> I saw one once - but it was sure slow!
That was the 2000, I think. Slow or not, I've been after one for a while, myself. :) Well, actually any amiga that's newer than my 1000... ;)
Regards,
Chris
Christopher Smith, Perl Developer
Amdocs - Champaign, IL
/usr/bin/perl -e '
print((~"\x95\xc4\xe3"^"Just Another Perl Hacker.")."\x08!\n");
'
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Fred Cisin (XenoSoft) [mailto:cisin@xenosoft.com]
> Certainly the PC hardware, regardless of OS or other software
> can NOT do
> Amiga.
> Can the Linux catweasel drivers actually use the catweasel as its disk
> controller for the file system? Or is this an issue that the
> catweasel
> software (that does NOT work at a filesystem level) can also RUN under
> linux?
Right, but remember that linux won't run only on peesees. :) Linux on a power-mac (or amiga!) will likely produce bit-for-bit copies of amiga disks just fine.
Also, I think it's the standard linux floppy disk driver, which is pretty flexible, and not a special "catweasel" driver, so it would be handled just the same as a standard floppy setup. So I guess you could write ext2 filesystems to 880k floppies if you want ;)
Or ... one could write an amiga filesystem for linux. I actually wonder why this hasn't been done.
> Has anybody, anywhere, EVER gotten a catweasel to work as a
> controller to
> do file system level operations?
After this discussion, I'm tempted to get one and try. Too bad I can't afford it just now.
Regards,
Chris
Christopher Smith, Perl Developer
Amdocs - Champaign, IL
/usr/bin/perl -e '
print((~"\x95\xc4\xe3"^"Just Another Perl Hacker.")."\x08!\n");
'
If a PC cannot, can a mac do it? I've got a performa or quadra just waiting
to do something here.
--
Antique Computer Virtual Museum/home of command central south
www.nothingtodo.org
> Someone the other day made reference to old-style and late-
>model SUN 13w3
>monitor cables. What's the difference between the two?
Hi,
I think there that the difference is in SYNC signals. The old
one had only composite SYNC and the new probbaly could provide
also V and H SYNC
Look to:
http://www.hut.fi/Misc/Electronics/faq/vga2rgb/interfacing.html#v
ga_13w3
Darek
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Tylko Nowy Kontakt umo?liwia rozmowy przez inne komunikatory internetowe!
Poznaj 100 mln nowych znajomych! Instalujesz? Kliknij! < http://kontakt.wp.pl >
On Jan 3, 13:12, Christopher Smith wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Fred Cisin (XenoSoft) [mailto:cisin@xenosoft.com]
> > The "standard linux floppy disk driver" will operate the
> > Catweasel card?
> > (It is NOT a floppy disk controller in terms of BIOS level
> > interaction.)
>
> I was under the impression that it would drive a catweasel card. I was
not aware that the card was significantly different than other (normal
peesee) floppy interfaces, though, so perhaps I got the wrong idea from
somewhere.
As far as I was able to determine, when I looked into this in the autumn,
the only support for the Catweasel under Linux is via a special driver
called cwfloppy, NOT the normal floppy driver. This works with Amiga disks
(and has limited MS-DOS support) only, and only for the ISA version on x86
and Alpha machines. Quote from the Catweasel page, ISA version section:
'Writing to disks is only possible under Linux at the moment. The
drivers are not designed to be easy-to-use. Instead, they are tools
"for-freaks-only". You can read disk images from the formats listed
above, and single files can be copied from Amiga, PC and C-64 disks.'
If you look at the driver homepage, it doesn't even mention C-64 or disk
images. There are some additional utilities to allow it to do things with
TRS80 disks, though.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
On Jan 3, 8:53, Ethan Dicks wrote:
> Personally, I plan to pick something that is _not_ a drop-in replacement
> for a DEC drive - I can format all sorts of stuff on an RQDX3, but it's
> nice to stick to the right models when you can to make drive geometry
> tables in the OS and/or drivers match.
Sensible idea. And RQDX1/RQDX2 need the "right" drives; they do bizarre
tests to see what they have connected (like stepping to illegal tracks) and
won't work unless the drive matches something hardcoded into the RQDX
"microcode".
> Have you formatted this drive on another controller and scanned for
> bad blocks? I know the RQDX3 has a "standard" way of handling them
> (well... standard for the RQDX line), so I'm not sure there's a
> "factory BBL" to reference
Not on MFM/ST412-type drives, no.
> or if there is, that the DQ614 does reference
> it, but I would see if the drive passes a low-level format on something
> else, perhaps a WD1003 in an old 486 that still has the format option
> in the BIOS menu. You could also try it on a WX-1 with its BIOS
> formatter (accessed through debug, typically).
The DQ614P program should include several controller and drive exercises
and tests, and a bad block (actually a bad track) utility.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
Sorry to spam the list, but the times demand...
I'm a software engineer with 20 years professional
experience. BS in computer science from the University
of Maryland, College Park. Seeking embedded development
work in the Washington, DC metro area. I know most
8-bit micros, several PICs, x86 and PPC-860/PPC-821.
I think I have a reasonable command of real-time
programming issues.
Contact me off-list if you can help.
Again, sorry... this came out of the blue. I figured
my current employer would last until March.
Thanks,
Bill Sudbrink
wh.sudbrink(a)verizon.net
i agree about the os but i dont agree on the attempt part
dont attempt it. do it. a computer is not that complex of a machine
at least a pc. an os is all theory and vision.
u can think up an entire os away from any pc.
u could then just go in and code the entire thing.
the hard part is thinking up what it is that u want
and how it has to work. the coding and so forth
is the easy part. this is the exact project i am working
on now
joee
! -----Original Message-----
! From: Dave McGuire [mailto:mcguire@neurotica.com]
!
!
! On January 4, ysgdhio wrote:
! > > Insert drummer joke here.
! >
! > Q: How do you know when there's a drummer at your door?
! > A: The knocking keeps getting faster.
!
! AHEM. B-|
!
! -Dave, drummer
!
! --
! Dave McGuire
"Hey, who's that behind the band?"
"Him? Yeah, he's thier drummer."
"Oh. I thought they only let musicians in here..."
--- David A Woyciesjes
*** 5 string bass player ***
--- C & IS Support Specialist
--- Yale University Press
--- mailto:david.woyciesjes@yale.edu
--- (203) 432-0953
--- ICQ # - 905818
>Ahh -- so what _do_ you call a guy who hangs around with a bunch of
>musicians?
A drummer of course (as an ex-percusionist, I heard this joke almost
daily) :-)
-chris
<http://www.mythtech.net>
Christopher Smith, Perl Developer
Amdocs - Champaign, IL
/usr/bin/perl -e '
print((~"\x95\xc4\xe3"^"Just Another Perl Hacker.")."\x08!\n");
'
> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Foust [mailto:jfoust@threedee.com]
> And keep in mind that the musicians only *think* they're
> communicating. :-) Insert drummer joke here.
Ahh -- so what _do_ you call a guy who hangs around with a bunch of musicians?
Regards,
Chris
On Jan 3, 11:51, Sergio Pedraja Cabo wrote:
> I did the first tests with the DQ614P.SAV program and my Dilog DQ614
> MFM controller board. This board simulates up to four RL01/02 units
> in one PDP-11 using one or two MFM hard disks. I am using:
>
[...]
> * One Dilog DQ614 Revision S
> * One Quantum MFM Hard Disk Q540 (Aka. RD52-A)
> * RT-11 v.4
> * I assume the vector addresses of the unit is 174400 and 160.
That should be correct, unless you have a non-standard PAL at U55 on the
DQ614.
> The software used is the DQ614P.SAV diagnostics program Revision 0,
> and one DL.SYS driver that came with the DQ614P program.
Why? Why don't you use the DL driver that came with the OS? The device
drivers are OS-version-specific, and the driver I put up beside the
formatter is for RT-11 5.04, which is different to RT-11 4.0.
> Well, the program starts ok. There is no apparently problem with the
> OS environment. It works with its DL.SYS module, with the own DL.SYS
> module of the RT11 V.4, and without it too.
>
> The program startup and asks me if I'm working with a C.R.T (I assume
> it speaks about a terminal).
Yes, as Ethan said that just means a VDU as opposed to a printing terminal
-- it affects how it treats the delete key, and in this case also affects
whether it clears the screen; if you answer "N" to the CRT question, it
won't print current cylinder addresses becasue the printout would consume a
lot of paper.
> Later the program asks me about the
> access vector for the controller. By default it uses 174400 and 160
> values. I assume them too. The next step is to select one MFM hard disk.
> My disk is the 73, one Quantum Q540.
If the drive you want to use is not in the list, instead of typing a number
>from the list, type "E". You'll then be prompted to enter number of heads,
number of cylinders, RWCC (which the manual says isn't used), cylinder at
whivch to start precompensation (also not used), and to pick a step rate
>from a list.
> Inmediately, the program permits
> me to select how much DL disks I want to emulate. I can emulate two
> RL02 and two RL01. The program asks me: "Are you sure ?". My answer is
> yes. The process begins... and some seconds later, the program send me
> a message telling: "UNEXPECTED RESPONSE IN ADDRESS 00000160 (sometimes
> is the address 00000000). I've tried to change the cable selection,
> the address selection, etc... In this case, the message tells me that
> the unit can't be accessed.
Sounds like you have the correct address and vector but something is
generating spurious interrupts. Is there another RL controller in the
system? Or something with a misconfigured vector?
> Like a final indication, the Q540 hard disk have 5 jumpers named
> DS1, DS2, DS3, DS4 and ^. Actually is selected the DS1.
That should be right. Make sure you have the 20-pin cable on J2, not J3.
Does the drive have a terminator?
> What is wrong ? I suspect that the program must be the same revision
> than the board (Revision "O" the program, revision "S" the board).
I don't think so. The program came with a Rev.K board.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
I use(d) that one. I believe it's short for 'diagonal cutters'.
--- David A Woyciesjes
--- C & IS Support Specialist
--- Yale University Press
--- mailto:david.woyciesjes@yale.edu
--- (203) 432-0953
--- ICQ # - 905818
! -----Original Message-----
! From: John Allain [mailto:allain@panix.com]
!
!
! Old Boss of mine called the larger triangular headed
! snippers (sim.: Xelite wire cutter) "Dykes". Any word
! on this... word. Is this a correct term?
!
! John A.
!
! -----Original Message-----
! From: ard(a)p850ug1.demon.co.uk [mailto:ard@p850ug1.demon.co.uk]
! Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2002 10:05 PM
! To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org
! Subject: Re: Connectors (was: NEXT Color Printer find
!
!
! >
! >
! >
! > > Mainly because people think it's just like a larger
! > > version of the DIY electric drill.
! > > right cutting angles on it) then the workpiece spins
! > > round and removes their fingers...
! >
! >
! > They can rip off a scalp too if you get long hair wrapped up
! > in them.
!
! That applies to lathes and milling machines too. It not a property of
! drill presses only, so it's not a reason why they're
! particularly dangerous.
!
! Anybody who has long hair (or loose clothing) near machine
! tools deserves
! all they get IMHO...
!
! -tony
Well, anyone who doesn't pull thier long hair back under a good hat, that
is. :)
--- David A Woyciesjes
--- C & IS Support Specialist
--- Yale University Press
--- mailto:david.woyciesjes@yale.edu
--- (203) 432-0953
--- ICQ # - 905818
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Golemancd(a)aol.com [mailto:Golemancd@aol.com]
> sometimes i forget that computer folks r technical people.
> i come from the arts where the only thing that is needed is
> understanding.
> i am on stage sometimes and all the musicians do is
> just nod or look at each other and everyone understands them.
> will try and and be more precise. i guess here that is needed.
Ok, this will be slightly OT:
Do you draw -- paint -- play music? What "arts" are these where precision is not needed?
Being an artist and musician, myself, I would really like to know.
Regards,
Chris
Christopher Smith, Perl Developer
Amdocs - Champaign, IL
/usr/bin/perl -e '
print((~"\x95\xc4\xe3"^"Just Another Perl Hacker.")."\x08!\n");
'
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Robert Schaefer [mailto:rschaefe@gcfn.org]
> I'm looking for info on one of these. I's some kind of XT
> clone, with an
> eight-bit passive backplane and an upgraded V20 on a CPU
> card. It runs
> MSDOS, and
> currently boots into dosshell. A little googling turns up
> numerous resumes
> containing Kaypro PC, and a number of old classiccmp posts
> regarding them,
> but no real info. kaypro.com seems to be down ATM. I'd
> especially like to
> know what the switch and pushbutton on the back of the CPU
> card do. IIRC
> it's not a reset button, but I might be mis-remembering.
Well, I have one of these. It was given to me a week ago. I have both the computer itself, and a kaypro monitor (in original box ;). No documentation or anything.
Let me know if you find out anything interesting. I haven't tried powering it on yet.
Chris
Christopher Smith, Perl Developer
Amdocs - Champaign, IL
/usr/bin/perl -e '
print((~"\x95\xc4\xe3"^"Just Another Perl Hacker.")."\x08!\n");
'
Happy Holidays!
*<:)
Sellam Ismail Vintage Computer Festival
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
International Man of Intrigue and Danger http://www.vintage.org
* Old computing resources for business and academia at www.VintageTech.com *
On January 4, ysgdhio wrote:
> > Insert drummer joke here.
>
> Q: How do you know when there's a drummer at your door?
> A: The knocking keeps getting faster.
AHEM. B-|
-Dave, drummer
--
Dave McGuire
St. Petersburg, FL "Less talk. More synthohol." --Lt. Worf
Hello everybody and Happy New Year (if applicable).
I did the first tests with the DQ614P.SAV program and my Dilog DQ614
MFM controller board. This board simulates up to four RL01/02 units
in one PDP-11 using one or two MFM hard disks. I am using:
* One PDP-11/23 PLUS with 128 Kwords of memory
* One PC connected to the second SLU simulating one TU58
double unit (thanks, Will Kranz !)
* One Dilog DQ614 Revision S
* One Quantum MFM Hard Disk Q540 (Aka. RD52-A)
* RT-11 v.4
Environment tips:
* I have configured the Dilog board to work under one PDP-11/23 PLUS
like the manual suggest.
* I did the probes simulating one up to four emulated RL02/01 disks.
* I assume the vector addresses of the unit is 174400 and 160.
The software used is the DQ614P.SAV diagnostics program Revision 0,
and one DL.SYS driver that came with the DQ614P program.
Well, the program starts ok. There is no apparently problem with the
OS environment. It works with its DL.SYS module, with the own DL.SYS
module of the RT11 V.4, and without it too.
The program startup and asks me if I'm working with a C.R.T (I assume
it speaks about a terminal). Later the program asks me about the
access vector for the controller. By default it uses 174400 and 160
values. I assume them too. The next step is to select one MFM hard disk.
My disk is the 73, one Quantum Q540. Inmediately, the program permits
me to select how much DL disks I want to emulate. I can emulate two
RL02 and two RL01. The program asks me: "Are you sure ?". My answer is
yes. The process begins... and some seconds later, the program send me
a message telling: "UNEXPECTED RESPONSE IN ADDRESS 00000160 (sometimes
is the address 00000000). I've tried to change the cable selection,
the address selection, etc... In this case, the message tells me that
the unit can't be accessed.
Like a final indication, the Q540 hard disk have 5 jumpers named
DS1, DS2, DS3, DS4 and ^. Actually is selected the DS1.
What is wrong ? I suspect that the program must be the same revision
than the board (Revision "O" the program, revision "S" the board).
If somebody can supply it to me, I'll agree a lot.
Any other suggestion about the vector address, etc, are welcome.
Thanks and Greetings
Sergio
I am just observing this thread, and have refrained from commenting
until now; several posters have echoed my sentiments and thus I will
reserve further comments save that, in my lifelong study of the structure
and beauty of the English language, I find the use of "sms/icq/chat"
formatting, **when used outside of those fora**, to be excruciatingly
juvenile and 'cutesy'... the modern equivalent of dotting all one's 'i's
with circles or (shudder) smiley faces. And don't get me started on
so-called "emoticons", either. ;}
As well. I have nothing to add concerning the 'contributions' of
AOLamers to the Internet (since Mr. Case first opened the sluiceways)...
alt.aol.sucks is there for all to peruse and react to as they see fit.
THAT BEING SAID: Since no one seems to remember why we're here -
What I want to know from the Gentleperson, 'from the arts' as you say
[what form of art? I have studied piano and music for more than 40 years,
I am a paid (occasionally) writer, some published poetry, scored a few
crummy movies, FYI...] is this: what comprises your collection, or
interests, in Classic Computing? Do you have a specialty area? Mine is
PDP-era DEC machines. I also collect and restore vintage electronic
musical instruments and outboard gear.
Do you work on / restore / re-sell classic computers?
Do you use classic computers in your Art? I sure do...
Do you have a particular name you'd rather be addressed as (other than
your 'screen name')?
I'm sorry the topic drifted to your choice of communication style. I
can share with you that, because a good deal of my professional writing is
for three or four consumer audio magazines, and since I provide an e-mail
box for readers to use, I am sometimes quite overwhelmed with high-school
and college-age correspondants who either 'sms' themselves into
incomprehensibility or bludgeon me WiTh HaX0R pRiNtIng D00DZ!!!!! I AM
3LIT3!!!!!
It does not, I assure you, impress. My two cents.
Please have a happy New Year, and I am very interested in hearing about
your involvement in classiccmping.
Cheers
John
As early as next week, I will launch the Classic Tech Eletter. It is a free,
twice-monthly newsletter with short news items on vintage computing
resources, collections, rescues, sales of important systems, and events. The
eletter's audience is primarily folks who have an interest in collecting
and/or preserving vintage systems.
If you want to receive the eletter, please send me a note at
eletter(a)classictechpub.com. You can see a sample issue at
www.classictechpub.com under the News heading. Your contact info will not be
sold or shared with anyone else.
Anyone who has a news item or announcement is welcome to send it along. I'm
eager to hear about your site updates or launches, availability of new
emulators, or interesting new finds.
Hope you enjoy the eletter.
--Mike
Michael Nadeau
Editorial Services
603-893-2379
>
>P.S i hope the grammer helps you understand this.
^^^^^^^
GRAMMAR
SteveRob
_________________________________________________________________
Join the world’s largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail.
http://www.hotmail.com
From: "Carlini, Antonio" <Antonio.Carlini(a)riverstonenet.com>
I have zero technical info so anything vaguely
technical would be nice. I've looked through
your list of docs, and apart from WPS, OS/8
(does that apply??) and docs with 78 in the date
I don't see any stuff that applies. Printsets,
tech manuals, anything that will help me fix it
(I'm sure it will break sometime in the next
thirty years or so ...) would be nice.
The OS/78 would be the applicable OS version for it and that is in the
document list. Some RX01/RX02 drive information is also
online. The prints I was referring to having are not scanned yet. I
probably have scanned half my documentation. These prints are about
an inch of double sided 11x17 pages. 11x17 is more difficult with my
scanner so tend to be lower on the scan priority list.
If somebody has failed hardware I will move the relevant prints to the
scan soon pile, otherwise they will appear eventually.
(I'm sure it will break sometime in the next
thirty years or so ...) would be nice.
I plan to have this all done in 25 years so you should be all set :-).
If you know the UK people need a particular portion of it let me know. I
don't have the time to scan it all in the near term. Email me the
request directly, with the list traffic I might miss it.
A local general purpose mechanic who mainly works on Ski-doos in the
winter and pumps and everything else in the summer gave me a complete
Adam (!) collecting dust on the shelf, when I told him I collect computers. He
mentioned he could use an old box to keep track of his parts inventory if I
had any spares. I volunteered to supply him with something that would serve
simple needs thinking of everything from a C-64 to an A2 or an XT to a 386
and that there must be 100s of programs that would be available. And no I
don't want to configure a Database program.
I did a Google search and found only the newest Gee-Whiz Winblows 9x,
2k, XP, and OSX programs, and while I haven't searched Simtel, out of
frustration I've decided to defer to the list about older programs to track
inventory and if it also has billing and labour, so much the better.
Any suggestions would be appreciated. It would serve as an example that
older machines don't have to be delegated to land-fills. This area is in north-
central Manitoba,Canada and not exactly a hotbed of technology. The
temperature at present is -20 C, but the air is breathable.
Lawrence
Lawrence
Reply to:
lgwalker(a)mts.net
>Old Boss of mine called the larger triangular headed
>snippers (sim.: Xelite wire cutter) "Dykes". Any word
>on this... word. Is this a correct term?
I learned that Dykes were the square nosed pliers/wire cutters. Later to
learn them by a seemingly more proper name of "Bull Nose Pliers". And I
have heard the triangular headed ones called Dykes as well, but I have
always just called them wire cutters (but I interchange Dykes and Bull
Nose pliers all the time for the other ones.)
I have NO idea if these are the right terms (I would lean towards
thinking Bull Nose is correct, but I tend to doubt Dykes is anything more
than an used term)
-chris
<http://www.mythtech.net>
>Chris, I suggest that you do not have all of the relevant facts. The
>wrench carries that name because Crescent Tools were the original
>developer and manufacturer of it. That the name is used generically for
>all adjustable wrenches of that design is a tribute to its popularity
>and usefulness. Much the same as we speak of `xeroxing' copies.
>
>Centronics did not invent the Blue Ribbon connector. Amphenol did.
>Centronics merely found a useful application that became the standard
>parallel connector on printers (and on early computers - pre IBM). Not
>quite the same accomplishment.
I know the facts, and I know exactly why it carries that name (much like
a Yankee Drill). But the arguments regarding the usage of terms was that
you should call the item by its name, NOT by the common usage term. It
becomes irrevlivant if the common name is that of the maker (in the case
of Crescent), or of the company that popularized it (in the case of
Centronics). The name is wrong either way. Under the "Crescent" logic,
lets just call the "Centronics" connector an "Amphenol"... unless that
will confuse the issue as they already have a number of connectors
commonly refered to as "amp".
I was really pointing out the irony that support for the "its not a
Centronics" argument was itself using a term that is doing EXACTLY what
the Centronics term is doing... miscalling an item because of a popular
name.
I guess that was lost in the typing... I'll try to sprinkly more
emoticons in my text next time.
-chris
<http://www.mythtech.net>
Hi all.
Well, what Johnny proposed works almost, but the information
was useful enough to get in. He's the story of yesterday eve.
^Z will pop up the time/date prompt again. Hitting ^C gives
the DCL> prompt. When you enter RUN $ACNT (without the CR
because I was re-reading the e-mail from Johnny again), the
system appends ^U after some 30 seconds and asks again for
the time and date. Again ^C, followed by RUN $ACNT and now with
the CR, gives the response "MCR -- Task active" and the time and
date prompt reappears. So I hit ^Z (according to my notes when
I am typing this, but now I am not sure whether it was ^Z or ^C,
followed by a CR.
To my surprise the screen blanks and the top line shows:
*** Micro/RSX Account File Maintenance Utility ***
Account file is now sorted by UIC
Account Utility options are:
<the list>
Using the List option it shows just two accounts:
Owner=[001,010]
L_name=MICRO Login_defaults=SY00:[SYSMGR] Password=(ENCRYPTED)
Def_CLI=DCL F_name= Account=#1
Total_logins=39 Session ID=PRV
Characteristics=NOSlave Last_login=14-FEB-97 13:41:51
NODef_Protection Def_dir_string NOSilent
Owner=[201,001]
L_name=USER Login_defaults=SY00:[USER] Password=(ENCRYPTED)
Def_CLI=DCL F_name=A.NEW Account=#0
Total_logins=0 Session ID=USR
Characteristics=NOSlave Last_login=None
NODef_Protection Def_dir_string NOSilent
So, it appears as if the user of this system has always used the
priveleged account. With the Modify option I changed the password
to supervisor and the I terminated the utility. Guess what?
The account MICRO/SUPERVISOR lets me in! This shows up:
Micro/RSX V3.1 BL24C [1,54] System MICROD
2-JAN-02 20:24 Logged on Terminal TT0: as PRV1
Good Evening
******************************************
* Welcome to Micro/RSX *
* Version 3.1 Base level 24C *
* This is file LB:[1,2]LOGIN.TXT *
******************************************
$ @LB:[1,2]SYSLOGIN.CMD
$@ <EOF>
$
I entered "SHOW DEV" and this is the result:
TT0: [SYSMGR] [1,10] Logged in Loaded
TT1: Loaded
TT2: Loaded
TT3: Loaded
TT4: Loaded
TT5: Loaded
VT0: Loaded
VT1: Loaded
RD0: Loaded
DU0: Public Mounted Loaded Label=MICRODRSX Type=RD53
Cached
DU1: Loaded Type=RX50
DU2: Loaded Type=RX50
DU3: Offline Loaded Type=unknown
MU0: Loaded Type=TK50
NL0: Loaded
TI0:
CO0: NL0:
CL0: NL0:
SP0: DU0:
LB0: DU0:
SY0: DU0:
I do not know what DU3: could have been. MU0: is recognized
because the controller is in the system, I presume. At the
rear a 3-row, many (50?) pins male "D"-connector is fitted.
I will open the box this evening.
Here are some questions aI have.
Is Micro/RSX 3.1 an old version? It accepts 2002 without any problem.
Are there special things to look for? What commands do I need to get
the information about the system?
I want to add a DELQA. Can this be placed in any slot?
I finished the proper way: "RUN [1,54]SHUTUP".
That's what I am doing now. The mail is long enough.
- Henk.
>If one wanted to be "historically correct", which version
>would have been on a MicroVAX II during the time they
>were in production? How would you now get that version
>on a TK50 tape?
Well MicroVMS V1.0 was (IIRC) based on
VAX/VMS V4.0 with some bits cut out.
That probably shipped with the MicroVAX I.
The MicroVAX II came hot on its heels
(again, IIRC) so an early MicroVMS would
be appropriate. Good luck finding one.
By the time we were running our LAVC
with a MicroVAX II and a VS2000 in
1987 in the UK, VAX/VMS V4.5 was current
and shipped with our MicroVAX II. It
needed to be upgraded to either V4.5B
or V4.5C to support the VS2K or the
VS2K in a LAVC (I forget the exact issue,
I do remember it was the first upgrade
that I ever did).
Antonio
I'm looking for info on one of these. I's some kind of XT clone, with an
eight-bit passive backplane and an upgraded V20 on a CPU card. It runs
MSDOS, and
currently boots into dosshell. A little googling turns up numerous resumes
containing Kaypro PC, and a number of old classiccmp posts regarding them,
but no real info. kaypro.com seems to be down ATM. I'd especially like to
know what the switch and pushbutton on the back of the CPU card do. IIRC
it's not a reset button, but I might be mis-remembering.
Bob
Ethan:
I may actually have a copy of the Cheap Video Cookbook that I got
with the TVT6 board for the KIM that I have (unbuilt in the package -- it's
killing me). Is it black with a multi-color image on the front?
If the binding is in acceptable condition, I'll copy it and scan it. Now I
have to find it :-)
Rich
==========================
Richard A. Cini, Jr.
Congress Financial Corporation
1133 Avenue of the Americas
30th Floor
New York, NY 10036
(212) 545-4402
(212) 840-6259 (facsimile)
-----Original Message-----
From: Ethan Dicks [mailto:erd_6502@yahoo.com]
Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 3:01 PM
To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org
Subject: KIM-1 (was Re: Cheap Video cookbooks and machines WTD)
--- Ben Franchuk <bfranchuk(a)jetnet.ab.ca> wrote:
> Hans B Pufal wrote:
> >
> > Philip Pemberton wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > > I'm trying to get a copy of Don Lancaster's "Cheap Video
> > > Cookbook" and "Son of Cheap Video" books
I don't think the "Cheap Video Cookbook" would survive the scanning
process (or at least, mine surely wouldn't - the binding would fragment
and I would have a stack of loose sheets - easier to scan, but kinda
messy for later).
The guy who gave me the pile of S-100 stuff this week had "Son of
Cheap Video", but he kept it.
> I think somebody has done a KIM clone on the web if you need a clone.
The KIM is one of the items on my list from that era to aquire (got a
SYM-1 and an AIM-65). I'd love to see a website about a clone. Was it
this - http://home.hccnet.nl/g.baltissen/kim-rb.gif - you were thinking
of? A schematic, but no board layout (I can generate schematics all day
long with OrCAD, but for a variety of reasons, I've never been able to
successfully migrate one of my designs to a layout package, which is why
the Elf99 project stalled).
> From what I remember off the web
> a 'true' KIM used custom 65xx parts for I/O and memory select.
They do - custom 6530s - 1K ROM, 64 bytes of RAM, I/O and timer. Handy
if you are trying to make a reduced-part-count machine. I think there's
been some effort to imitate a KIM-1 6530 with a daughter-card, but I
don't know if anyone has ever successfully emulated one.
There's a *nice* KIM-1 page at, surprise, surprise, http://www.kim-1.com/
as well as Ruud Baltison's page at
http://home.hccnet.nl/g.baltissen/kim.htm
(Ruud is a frequent poster on the cbm-hacker's list)
-ethan
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Send your FREE holiday greetings online!
http://greetings.yahoo.com
> q2: Do the RD52's, RD54's have this flaw too?
> (I have 4 RDxx'es, no 53's)
> Are these suckers all Quantums?
> John A.
Both the RD52's and RD54's have proven to be pretty good drives, especially
considering their age. Basically the RD53 is the only lemon.
Zane
Hey, all.
I've been offered a trade of a MV-III CPU, 8M memory board to match,
and a graphics board for the naked BA123 in the garage. I have some
spare RD53 disks, and a couple of TK50 drives. The gentleman is asking
how many disks the CPU boards are worth, and I haven't a clue.
Any opinions?
Doc
>This is a grey issue. Brand names often become generic. I bet when you
>want an "aspirin" you don't ask for a "pain reliever" or
>"analgesic", and, unless you are a polymer chemist, what would you call
>"styrofoam" other than "styrofoam"? Examples abound:
>Kleenex, Band-aid, Thermos (from King-Sealy Thermos), Frisbee, etc. The
>purpose of language is to communicate with precision, and
>sometimes the most precise way is to use the "common usage" term. You
>would sound pretty preposterous asking someone to toss you
>that "plastic flying disc."
Ok.. THANK YOU... this is the whole point. Crescent Wrench, Yo-Yo,
Centronics... it matters not what the "correct" name is... what matters
is that people understand what you are talking about, and that means,
sometimes the "common name" takes over.
Why is it that when it comes to a wrench, people can understand this, but
when it comes to connectors they get their underwear in a bunch? My guess
is, for the same reason I see red every time someone pulls out a video
camera and says "let me film this"... it is TAPE damnit not film... to
"normal" people, this makes no difference, to someone that spent years
working in TV, it makes all the difference in the world (and if confused
when talking about going on location for a shoot, you could wind up with
a radically different set of equipment).
-chris
<http://www.mythtech.net>
In a message dated 1/2/2002 8:58:44 PM Eastern Standard Time,
jhellige(a)earthlink.net writes:
<< >OS/2 v 1.3 runs decent on a PS/2 model 60 286-10 with 3 meg. Too had it
>doesnt have the WPS though.
How different is the interface and such with 1.3? Didn't
they make major changes with 2.X? >>
it kinda looks like win3.1 in a twisted way except you dont have the program
manager window. not many icons at all either. 2.x was a big change in the way
it looks.
OS/2 trivia: OS/2 had a 'start' command before micros~1 used it in the
version after 3.1 !
--
Antique Computer Virtual Museum
www.nothingtodo.org
Hi all,
The thread on cleaning cards by running them through
the dishwasher was timely as I am resurrecting an
HP3000/XE. The system came from Pacific Pipe in
Oakland and is the *filthest* system I have ever seen.
The "computer room" on the second floor was left open
to the work yard and all matter of dirt, dust, grime
etc was sucked into the CPU, disc drive and tape. The
CPU boards literally had a layer of grime covering
them.
Of course since this was an HP box it booted right up
even though it was basically "clogged".
Many of the HP cards have paper stickers indicating
part number, revision, etc. Any thoughts on preserving
these through a dishwasher cycle? Or should I just
gently hand rinse? THanks!
Lee Courtney
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Send your FREE holiday greetings online!
http://greetings.yahoo.com
In a message dated 1/2/2002 8:07:58 PM Eastern Standard Time,
jhellige(a)earthlink.net writes:
<< EE stands for Extended Edition, vice the other version which
was Standard Edition, if memory serves correctly. I also believe
that it was shortly after the release of 1.2 or 1.3 that MS and IBM
went their seperate ways on it, IBM continuing to develope it as OS/2
while MS renamed the shared source code 'Windows NT'. Though the
original specs for OS/2 called for at least an 80286, I've never
tried running any versions prior to 2.1 (which calls for at least an
80386SX). >>
OS/2 v 1.3 runs decent on a PS/2 model 60 286-10 with 3 meg. Too had it
doesnt have the WPS though.
--
Antique Computer Virtual Museum
www.nothingtodo.org
! From: Jochen Kunz [mailto:jkunz@unixag-kl.fh-kl.de]
!
!
! > (assuming X11 worked on
! > the Vaxstation 3100 under Ultrix -- I assume it would.)
! AFAIK the SPX graphics was not supported, only the mono and GPX
! framebuffers.
So there is some chance of NetBSD/Xwindows running on my b&w 3100m38?
--- David A Woyciesjes
--- C & IS Support Specialist
--- Yale University Press
--- mailto:david.woyciesjes@yale.edu
--- (203) 432-0953
--- ICQ # - 905818
> Does anybody have a copy of this? I have MS OS/2 1.3, and I have
> TCP/IP for OS/2 1.3 EE, but they don't work together. I'd love to have
> EE so I can put TCP/IP on it and install the lot on a 286. Maybe I can
> dig up a web server for it. :)
>
> Thanks!
>
> --James B.
Microsoft OS/2 1.3?!?! It was my understanding at the time that Microsoft
had nothing to do with V1.3. For that matter, what does the 'EE' stand for?
Zane
>You are still missing the point....
No, I'm really not... see below
>My complant, yet again, is using the term 'Centronics port' for a SCSI
>interface using a 50 pin Blue Ribbon connector. Because that interface
>has little in common with the parallel printer interface mentioned above.
>And when this SCSI port is on a printer it is very misleading to call it
>a Centronics interface.
Sorry, Tony, I was never trying to argue this point. I was only trying to
point out the irony of using a misnomer to fight a misnomer....
regardless of the validity of either one... I had just found the idea
funny.
I personally don't disagree with trying to correct names... nor do I
disagree with calling things by their "common" name, nor do I disagree
with calling things by their WRONG names. As long as the item in question
can be successfully communicated... which can sometimes, such as with the
miscalling a SCSI-1 "Blue Ribbon" connector, a Centronics port, cause
confusion. I understood what was meant, but others, more technically
savvy than I may have been confused (in part because to me, a connector
similar to that found on a printer, but that contains 50 pins is used for
one of two things, SCSI-1, or 25 pair phone cable, and since this was a
printer, I ruled out phone cable). To people like yourself, who have more
knowledge than I can ever hope to, probably know of dozens more uses, and
thus find it a problem to call it the wrong thing.
>But this list is made up (at least in part) of technical people for whom
>it _does_ matter whether an interface is a parallel printer port or a
>SCSI interface. It may not matter to the average user (provided both
>machine and printer have the same interface and mating connectors), but
>it certainly matters to people here who want to use the printer with
>other machines, who want to repair or modify it, and so on.
Agreed (see above). For those that this kind of thing can mean something
totally different than what was intended, it matters a great deal (like
my tape vs film situation... if I had ever told a crew, "lets go down to
the courthouse and shoot some film... get a crew together", I would have
been in for a rude surprise when they showed up with a 32mm camera and
DAT deck... when what I wanted was 2 guys and a BetaCam outfit).
But like I said, my intent was never to argue this point at all... it was
simply to point out the humor in the one responder's comments regarding a
Crescent wrench, when discussing calling things by their correct name.
See, I took it along the lines of them saying "Don't call it a Centronics
Port, because if you do again, I am going to smack you with my Craftsman
Brand Crescent Wrench". Now granted, that isn't what they said, but maybe
now some of the irony I originally saw will come thru. They are saying
don't call something by the wrong name, because if you do I will hit you
with something that I am calling by the wrong name. I found it funny... I
guess I am more easily amused than some others on the list (and yes, I am
fascinated by shiny objects)
-chris
<http://www.mythtech.net>
> Old Boss of mine called the larger triangular headed
> snippers (sim.: Xelite wire cutter) "Dykes". Any word
> on this... word. Is this a correct term?
Yes, it's a contraction of "DIagonal Cutters".
-dq
In a message dated 1/2/2002 5:19:07 PM Eastern Standard Time,
lgwalker(a)mts.net writes:
<< Well I have to go with what I have excess in my collection. Since I
don't
have any MCA SCSI cards much less SCSI drives I can spare I'll go with the
ESDE's that came with it. His shop is a large shed he built himself 10 yrs
ago, with a little nook he uses for his records and paper work. It might be
advisable tho to reverse the fan and rig up a filter of some sort as you
point
out. This is strictly a gift so I don't want to install stuff which I would
pay for
out of my limited resources, and I doubt he would have monies available for
what might be considered not a priority as compared to a new set of
wrenches. Thanks >>
If i dont have to pay shipping, I can contribute a SCSI card and maybe drive
or two. problem is, you'll need the bracket for mounting 3.5 hard drives in
the mod 80.
--
Antique Computer Virtual Museum
www.nothingtodo.org
In replay to my moan about engineers not being able to build Christmas
tree lights, Tony Duell writes:
> Do you own a suitably large LART?
I've given up with the LART, it just doesn't work - re-education is a better
approach - but then it doesn't work on the brain dead.
> I must have told the story of the 362.8 ohm resistor. In case I haven't,
> it goes like this......
I used to own an 8in Shugart drive a long time ago. For some strange reason
that I couldn't understand it was stuffed with E96 resisors. Perhaps they were
cheaper than E24 ?
> I've come to the conclusion that the best (electronic?) engineers and
> programmers are all essentially self-taught. It's probably much the same
> in all creative subjects.
I'd agree
> ......You may argue that much of engineering these days is not about making
> things, and that engineers rarely need these skills (that is a separate
rant)...
I'd argue that engineering is all about making things. OK, perhaps engineers
don't need practical skills so much these days, but an understanding of other
engineering disiplines is essential. You have to be able to understand the
"other guy's" point of view, whether it be hardware, software, manufacturing
or management.
Lawrence Walker wrote:
> Well from what I've heard about the "father of electricity" and Henry Ford
for
> that matter, he would hire a bunch of "promising" engineers like Tesla,
> take what they've already discovered, claim them as products of his own
> and become a wold-famous inventor. And of course, like Marconi, become the
> "inventor of Radio" which we are now celebrating, despite the fact that
Tesla
> won a court decision in US courts to his primacy with it. History is
written by
> the Victors.
I hope you meant Faraday as the "father of electricity" and not Edison.
As for Marconi, I'd say he "pioneered" radio engineering but wouldn't have
got very far if it hadn't been for Hertz. I'm not sure how Tesla fits into the
picture, he did invent the squirel cage induction motor but I'm not aware
of any major contributions he made to radio engineering.
Chris
On December 31, Fred Cisin (XenoSoft) wrote:
> The only place that I have EVER met any people who claimed to be
> "engineers" who might "have never heard of Amphenol" would be some
> university folk who have never set foot into the real world.
Ahh, those "engineers" who don't know which end of a soldering iron
gets hot.
A fond memory from around 1991, while working for a small defense
contractor in NJ, talking with a 2nd-year "summer slave" on loan from
MIT (of all places!). I'd assigned him to write some data reduction
code in FORTRAN for a remote sensing project, and later wound up
having to do it myself:
Me: "This program needs a lot of work."
Weenie: "Hah! Where did *YOU* go to school? See here:"
[weenie scribbles some incomprehensible equation on the whiteboard]
Me: "I didn't. But I damn well know a REAL*4 on this VAX won't
deal with the IEEE-format floating point numbers from the
spectrometer without format conversion, for starters.
Weenie: "WHAT?! [horrified look] You actually want to RUN this program?"
Me: "Of course. Why the hell do you think I asked you to write it?"
Weenie: "Isn't this just an exercise?"
Me: "We are a defense contractor. We build machines to kill
people. Look at the size of my gut...we NEVER exercise
around here."
Weenie: "Does this mean I have to type this program in, like on a computer?"
Me: "No. You're fired."
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire
St. Petersburg, FL "Less talk. More synthohol." --Lt. Worf
Be sure of the result before you suggest.
I used to also handle automotive product so I have a better
than average knowledge of the ourcome.
Allison
From: William Donzelli <aw288(a)osfn.org>
To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org <classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org>
Date: Saturday, December 29, 2001 5:24 PM
Subject: Re: Try it!!!! (Was - Re: One More PCB Dishwasher Question)
>> But is not that change the same as going from COLD to HOT when you
apply
>> power to the chip under normal operation of the computer?
>
>For the big stuff, sure. Not for the small stuff (glue, I/O, memory, and
>other stuff that does not suck much power).
>
>Here is a test. Boil some water in a big pot, as if you were to make
>pasta. Turn the gas off, let it cool just a few seconds, then dump all
your
>favorite chips in. I am sure one will not comeout alive (or maybe
crippled).
>
>William Donzelli
>aw288(a)osfn.org
>Aah, I'm getting tired. I rest my case.
Your tool listing was NOT from a catalog... it was from someone saying
what you need to show up with. I specifically said it would NOT be listed
that way in a CATALOG (although, I do retract my statement, as I have
found one such listing that it does to my great surprise). Since it is a
list of tools to show up with... it could very well be that you should
have a true Crescent wrench (but that is stretching it pretty far, so I
am sure they are just refering to any adjustable "crescent" wrench)
As for the theater, that may be regional, that may not be... the theaters
in my area do NOT call it a crescent wrench unless you are a "rookie".
That doesn't mean other theaters don't. (And we call the others a "pipe
wrench" or a "monkey wrench" depending on if it has a loose head or not,
pipe is loose, monkey is fixed)
Once again, it is language, and ALL language is regional, sometimes as
microscale as within a few city blocks.
The argument still holds no water when the discussion is calling an item
by its CORRECT name. Crescent, no matter HOW "accepted" is not the
"technically" correct name. It is no more correct than a DB9 in reference
to what is a DE9. Sure, it might be widely accepted, and you may have a
better chance of getting what you really want, but it is still
"technically" incorrect.
Aah... I'M getting tired... I give up... this was never supposed to be a
wrench discussion, it was supposed to be a one shot email pointing out
irony. (Hey Sellam... demand some moderation already to bring this to an
end and put me out of my misery)
-chris
<http://www.mythtech.net>
R. P. Bell said:
> Anybody got any good suggestions on where to go to get a nice SGI Indy, just
> for playing around -- preferably cheap?
Contact me off list and let me know what your idea of cheap is.
William Barnett-Lewis
wlewis(a)mailbag.com
> At least around here, they are teaching that it is an Adjustable Wrench,
> and specifically teaching that it is NOT a Crescent wrench.
Heh. Mexican speed wrench...
;)
-dq
>Yes (assuming the VT78/WS78/WT78 are all the same thing). Are you
needing
>some part in particular or just general looking?
I have a WT78 (along with its dual floppy drives).
I left the table behind but now I realise I've
probably destroyed its historical value :-(
It came with a couple of 8" floppies
and a few (two or three) WPS manuals.
I have zero technical info so anything vaguely
technical would be nice. I've looked through
your list of docs, and apart from WPS, OS/8
(does that apply??) and docs with 78 in the date
I don't see any stuff that applies. Printsets,
tech manuals, anything that will help me fix it
(I'm sure it will break sometime in the next
thirty years or so ...) would be nice.
The computer conservation society here in the
UK had one too that they were working on
(I don't recall it's exact condition) but they
didn't have any docs available when last I
looked.
I'll hunt out my two or three docs soon (they're
in the garage too - and it's a tad cold right now!)
and I'll get them scanned if they're not something you
already have.
Antonio
This is a possibly [OT] but a rather acute
problem on the European continent and maybe
elsewhere.......... and WP51 under MS-DOS is
rather vintage these days .....................
How do you get your good ol' WP5x to print
anything resembling a EURO SYMBOL .....
I had to figure out this problem for my girlfriend
cause at her work they still work with WP51 in
a MS-DOS environment and it will take a few
month (maybe years) before they'll switch to
some winsux solution ........
(I admit this sounds stupid but, uhm... it's true!)
For anyone with the same pressing needs .........
I've posted a few EURO-symbol options in
a WP5x file in the Euro-folder of the filesection
of my website. (English and Dutch versions aviable)
Sipke de Wal
-----------------------------------------------
http://xgistor.ath.cx
-----------------------------------------------
>I install fire alarm systems... Now, if you had asked me which one connects
>the handset to the phone, you'd have me stumped!
I had been taught that was a Rj-11 "handset", which has never really sat
well with me... but it is what I was taught, and it is what my telco
catalogs list the part as, so I had to accept it.
Thanks to that link, it is claimed to be an RJ-22, which sits MUCH better
with me since it has its own designation. I can't speak for its accuracy
as it is the first time I have heard that, but if I had to pick, I would
go with RJ-22 over RJ-11 "handset".
Oh, and I was taught in the field all my telco knowledge, never went to
school... it is learned from various Bell and private
installers/techs/whathaveyou... so who knows how accurate they are, but I
tend to give them more credence than most schools (except maybe some Bell
installers, the older ones are good, but most of the younger ones suck
royally)
-chris
<http://www.mythtech.net>
On December 30, Chris wrote:
> >Would they call common network connectors "8 pin RJ-11"?
> >Or would they call them "8 pin telephone connectors"?
>
> Neither, 8 pin RJ's are an RJ-45 (11 is a 4 pin, comes in either standard
> or handset sizes... can also have just 2 pins for "cheap" cords... 12 is
> a 6 pin, same physical size as a standard RJ-11)
It's important to note that the RJ designations specify not only the
connector type, but the pinout.
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire
St. Petersburg, FL "Less talk. More synthohol." --Lt. Worf
>>what should you
>> call a Yo-Yo? (just seeing how many people know the answer to this one)
>
>Who knows? It's a YoYo here too.
It was a trick question
The correct answer is still YoYo. The YoYo was invented by/originally
sold by the YoYo company. They only made the one self named toy. Duncan
later came out with the same toy (capatalizing on the the success), and
called it a YoYo since that is all people knew it by. YoYo Corp failed to
sue in a timely manner (because they were getting recognition for every
sale, not just their own). When Duncan started to beat them out, they
then sued for trademark infringement, but lost, because it was deemed too
late.
Thus YoYo became not only the name of the manufacturer, but officially
the name of the toy as well.
Frisbee is a similar situation, there is no other "offical" name for the
flying disc toy
-chris
<http://www.mythtech.net>
>> This is my fifth attempt to get deleted.If i swear will i
>> get automaticly wiped?
>> Please help me surely someone can.
>
>Well, you must be old enough to wipe yourself to be on
>this list. Please consult here for instructions:
> http://www.classiccmp.org/firsthelp.html
Well I had the opposite problem - it took me
three goes to get subscribed; the final method
(which worked) was to find the list owner's
email and go direct :-) I don't know whether the
automatic stuff was broken for all or just broken
for me (nor, indeed, do I know whether it is fixed).
So maybe he's tried and it doesn't work, in which
case maybe he'll reply :-) I'd post
Jay's email but since he moved just afore
Xmas (IIRC) then it may not be too much use.
Antonio
Please help me surely someone can.
_______________________________________________________________________
Never pay another Internet phone bill!
Freeserve AnyTime, for all the Internet access you want, day and night, only ?12.99 per month.
Sign-up at http://www.freeserve.com/time/anytime
Oh yeah-- I almos' forgot:
..cx - Christmas Island
..tw - Republic of China
________________________________________________________________
GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO!
Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less!
Join Juno today! For your FREE software, visit:
http://dl.www.juno.com/get/web/.
..ch - Switzerland
..ru - Rumania ??? <<< RUssia
________________________________________________________________
GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO!
Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less!
Join Juno today! For your FREE software, visit:
http://dl.www.juno.com/get/web/.
On January 1, Fred Cisin (XenoSoft) wrote:
> KEEPING THE DISPLAYS PRETTY WAS MORE IMPORTANT THAN THE DATA INTEGRITY!
Wow, sounds like Windows!
--
Dave McGuire
St. Petersburg, FL "Less talk. More synthohol." --Lt. Worf
+AD4- John Allain wrote:
+AD4-The two problems I'm aware of is that the CD's aren't
+AD4-9660 or PC compatible, so you need a VAX. Also most
There is a Windows (or DOS??) reader available
on the OpenVMS Freeware V4 CD at:
http://www.openvms.compaq.com/freeware/freeware40/ods2-reader/
My recollection is that there was an even better
one on the V3 Freeware but I cannot locate it on the
V4 or V5 disks (I know some stuff was pruned to
make room for newer stuff).
Of course, once you get that far
you'll find that the binaries
are mostly OpenVMS BACKUP savesets
(and if they aren't, they'll be PCSI...)
and the docs are almost certainly in Bookreader
format (and the Windows Bookreader product
never made it out of the door).
You +ACo-might+ACo- be able to make some use of this
using the SIMH and TS10 VAX emulators, but
I've not got around to firing those
up yet and playing.
Antonio
Please read this message:
http://www.faqs.org/save_faqs-org.html
I don't know how many of you use faqs.org to get FAQs (I don't myself) but
I happened to run by this message and thought I would pass it along.
They're in need of funding as they've lost their previous sponsorship.
Sellam Ismail Vintage Computer Festival
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
International Man of Intrigue and Danger http://www.vintage.org
* Old computing resources for business and academia at www.VintageTech.com *
> > Oh, I know. But no self-respecting scooter tramp, or British auto
> > enthusiast for that matter, can let a reference to Lucas go by.
> > "It's the Law."
>
> I have heard about the "love" people have towards Lucas. I have some old
> radar stuff they made for World War 2, and...ummm...I am not impressed...
How's the joke go? Why do the Brits drink their beer warm?
Lucas Refrigerators....
Then, there's Lucas, Prince of Darkness...
Tony?
-dq
You DEC old-timers out there will probably chuckle at my little
"discovery", but I'm posting my findings for us who are "DEC challenged"....
Yesterday I was pulling my hair out trying to get my VAX 4000-500 to
recognize an external RRD-43 CD-ROM that was attached to a KZQSA SCSI
adapter. No matter what I did, it wouldn't recognize the fact that anything
SCSI was connected.
The problem turned out to be the address that the KZQSA was set to. It was
set to address 761400, and the 4000 was reporting the card to be a DEFQA,
which to even a DEC newbie as myself, was VERY wrong. A search through the
"VMS wizard" archives at Compaq.com turned up the statement that the KZQSA
was shipped with a default address of 761300.
So I fiddled with the address jumpers and set it to 761300 and *voila*, the
4000 found the KZQSA. I hooked the external SCSI enclosure to the card, and
it found the CD-ROM.
It was able to boot VMS from the CD, and I'm on my way.
Again, don't laugh too hard, I hope this message helps others who are
"Unibus Ignorant"....
- Matt
Matthew Sell
Programmer
On Time Support, Inc.
www.ontimesupport.com
(281) 296-6066
Join the Metrology Software discussion group METLIST!
http://www.ontimesupport.com/cgi-bin/mojo/mojo.cgi
"One World, One Web, One Program" - Microsoft Promotional Ad
"Ein Volk, Ein Reich, Ein Fuhrer" - Adolf Hitler
Many thanks for this tagline to a fellow RGVAC'er...
Hi all.
First of all, best wishes and good health for 2002!
During the holidays I had a look at my 11/53.
It boots fine, this is what appears on the VT102.
9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
<head load/unload on the RX50>
DU0
Micro/RSX
Micro/RSX system startup procedure <in double-width font>
Copyright (C) 1986 by ..
Time and date: 13:44 31-dec-01 <filled in by myself>
Startup will take between one to three minutes to complete.
SFD -- Device not variable speed multiplexer
$;
$; Installing Software via Command File LB:[VGS5000MC]VGS5000.CMD
$;
Task "TT0 " terminated
Odd addrfess or other trap four
R0=000000
R1=100076
R2=000000
R3=040724
R5=000000
SP=121222
PC=123002
PS=170011
$;
$; Installing Software via Command File LB:[EDP]EDP.CMD
$;
31-DEC-01 13:45 From MICROD::TT0: to ALL:
SYSTEM READY FOR LOGIN
$
$ <EOF>
$
Have a Good Afternoon
31-DEC-01 13:45 TT0: logged off MICROD
$
So, I guess, this looks good.
I do not have any experience with RSX or Micro/RSX.
At the $ prompt MCR accepts only "login", "hello", and "help".
Now, I vaguely remember from this list that when you enter
login, the account is either "master" and the password is "system"
or vice versa. Neither combination is accepted.
Is there a way to get in, or remove the account file?
Or should I try to load an other OS as I want to add a DEQNA?
- Henk.
Just ran across your posting on the Tek 4041.
I've got both the Operators and Basic Programming Manuals for the 4041 and two of the computers with tapes!
I ran across the same problem - no 4041 keyboard.
You didn't mention whether you have any of the option ROMs in your 4041. They are in a pullout tray behind a snap in brown panel below the front keypad (use a coin in the slot in the top of the panel). If you have the Program Development ROMs you will be able to write 4041 BASIC programs - otherwise your machine will only execute 4041 programs from tape :(
Since you say you've been able to type some commands on your keyboard converter - I would say you might have the Program Development ROMs. I've got the full set Program Development v2.1 #1 and #2, 4041 Graphics, 4041 Plotting, 4041 Signal Processing and the 4041 Utility ROM.
Here are some control key sequences (listed as RS232 control keys) to try:
Control-A Autonumber
Control-B Break
Control-C Abort
Control-D followed by 1-9,0 User Defined Functions 11-20
Control-E or Backspace Rubout
Control-F followed by 1-9,0 User Defined Functions 1-10
Control-H Rubout
Control-I or Tab Horizontal tab
Control-K Kill to end of line
Control-N Recall Next
Control-O Insert
Control-P Recall Previous
Control-Q Continue 4041 output
Control-R Recall Line
Control-S Stop 4041 output
Control-T Step
Control-U Clear
Control-V Autoload
Control-W Move cursor to beginning of line
Control-X Delete line
Control-\ Move cursor left
Control-] Move cursor right
Control-^ "Meta"-prefix
followed by C CONTINUE
followed by L LIST
followed by R RUN
followed by other chars ignored
ESCAPE Suppress immediate execution of the following control character
The 4041 BASIC is a lot like 4050 series BASIC, but it has added commands for tape directories, GPIB, and uses a Stream specification format for devices.
My experience and 4041 Operators Manual says that RS232 must be configured before it becomes operational. Their recommendation is to create a file that is automatically loaded and run first on a tape when you press the AutoLoad button on the keypad.
The Tek System Verification tape actually prompts you "TERMINAL CONFIG(1-YES,2-NO)" at the beginning and allows you to key in RS232 parameters which are then saved to the Verification Tape.
Using your "keyboard" try the following commands:
SET DRIVER "COMM(BAU=2400,BIT=7,PAR=ODD):"
SET CONSOLE "COMM(CON=YES):"
If you have two serial ports on your 4041 you may have to add a zero device number to each of the lines (COMM0 instead of COMM).
Permitted COMM parameters and ranges:
BAUd 75,150,300,600,1200,2400,4800 default 2400
IBaud any integer from 2 to 9600 if 0, use the BAUd parameter
BIT 5,6,7,8,9 default 8, includes parity if used (BIT=5 has no parity, BIT=9 must include parity)
PARity NO,ODD,EVEn,HIGh,LOW default NO
STOp 1 or 2 default 2, for BIT=5 and STOp=2 uses 1.5 stop bits
FLAgging NO,INPut,OUTput,BIDirectional, default OUTput
MODem,AMOdem,EMOdem
EDit RASter,STOrage,402,ANSi,850 default RASter
FORmat ASCii,ITEm default ASCii. ITEm allows full 8bit codes
TYPe-ahead =>100 default 100. max 32K
DS OFF,ON default ON. Data Set Ready output line
CTS OFF,ON default ON. Clear to Send output line
DCD OFF,ON default ON. Data Carrier Detect output line
ERR LOG,REPort default REP. errors displayed immediately
ECHO YES,NO default YES
CONtrol YES,NO default YES
CR CR,CRLf,LFCr default CRLf
LF LF,CRLf,LFCr default CRLf
For the BASIC OPEN command, from my programmers reference guide:
OPEN #logical unit: stream spec [,string var]
ex: 1020 OPEN #1: "TAPE: FILEB (OPEN=UPDATE)",LU1$
Logical Unit 1 is designated as the tape file FileB, to be
updated. LU1$ is given the entire stream spec string.
Here is an input from GPIB device example:
INPUT #"GPIB(PRI=21):": Var
The numeric value Var is read from device 21 on GPIB
I found GET in the full Programmers Reference book - it issues a GPIB Group Execute Trigger command.
Syntax: GET[(numexp[,numexp]...)]
Bus Traffic:
[ATN UNL]
[ATN Listen-Address-1]
[{ATN Listen-Address-2}...]
ATN 8
Hope this helps,
Monty McGraw
Spring TX
Tek 4041,4052,4054,4631,4662,4957... :)
> From: Richard Erlacher <edick(a)idcomm.com>
> Sadly, if we allow the language to degenerate in the direction in which
it's
> been "progressing" over the past three decades, we'll reach a point where
> all our words are of a single syllable and only the inflections will
signify
> meaning. That's back to pre-Neanderthal communication, isn't it?
>
> 't
^^
> seems as though everyone wants to conceal the weaknesses in their own
> knowledge (and
> vocabluarly) by allowing others to fill in the blanks.
^^^^^^^^^^^^
> Unfortunately, the point at which we've now arrived is one where there
are
> more blanks than words. This isn't
> irreprarable, is it?
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Dude. Get a spell-checker. Or learn to spell. Especially when composing
messages concerning the deterioration of American English.
Glen
0/0
.
My sister-in-law works at the Post Office and knows lots of the
local customers. She happened to learn that one gentleman had
some "old computers" in the attic. When I called him, it turned
out to be an XOR S-100 box w/dual 8" drives, a Liberty 100
terminal, and some loose S-100 cards (including a Cromemco
serial/parallel card still in the shrink wrap, a few 8K cards
(2102 and 2114-based) and a couple of SMS video cards, one as
yet unstuffed with the chips under plastic).
No OS, few docs (some of the cards _do_ have manuals).
He kept the S-100 prototype card he once wrapped for his first CPU
(sockets intact, chips missing, wires removed).
The sad news is that he mentioned that he used to have an old computer
that he threw out... his son brought it home ($20 at a yard sale)
back when Dad had a 386 in the living room - it was a Digital Group
machine. :-(
So... Anyone have any info on XOR boxen? I have a CP/M disk for
the C-128 and stuff for the Kaypro, but nothing on 8". Can I mail
anyone blank disks to be copied onto? What sort of information
would I have to provide to be able to put together a compatible
disk? Brand of disk controller? Type and manufacturer of CPU card?
Serial card vendor?
Also, how did S-100 video cards work? Did you still have a console
terminal but use the video card as a secondary peripheral?
-ethan
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Send your FREE holiday greetings online!
http://greetings.yahoo.com
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Fred Cisin (XenoSoft) [mailto:cisin@xenosoft.com]
> Has anybody ever actually SEEN and USED any software for the catweasel
> that will make an Amiga disk (NOT duplicate one that is present)?
Not me, though, I've seen documents (probably in UAE) that say you can write disks to images and images to disks if you use it. The linux/netbsd/freebsd drivers, from all I've seen and heard, should access disks fine for making images and the like.
> I think that "MatchPoint" might be their board that you're
> thinkking of.
I was thinking of compati-card, actually. I was un-aware that it had this same limitation.
I may have to see if I can find one of these "MatchPoint" boards now, though. What are my chances?
> What software is available for Mac to do Amiga disks?
Again, I seem to remember from docs that UAE will use it directly. So you'd be stuck with a chicken-egg scenario where you need an image of the O/S (or boot disk) to get it working. :) Otherwise it would work fine.
I have seen mappings for the linux fdparam (I think that's the program..) which will make your system use the format at a low level, and have heard that catweasel works with linux. In that case you can image/unimage the disks pretty simply.
As for a program that reads/writes the filesystem (I assume that's what you're asking...), I don't know of one, but I believe that given the number of people interested in amiga emulation, somebody must have written one. If they havent, get an amiga emulator set-up, and chances are that will do it for you. (Again, I seem to remember mention of this in the UAE docs)
I would, of course, be interested to hear from anyone who's really tried it. :)
Regards,
Chris
Christopher Smith, Perl Developer
Amdocs - Champaign, IL
/usr/bin/perl -e '
print((~"\x95\xc4\xe3"^"Just Another Perl Hacker.")."\x08!\n");
'
In a message dated 1/1/2002 7:55:15 PM Eastern Standard Time,
vze2mnvr(a)verizon.net writes:
<< > on a public mailing list
And one that get's archived permanently into one of the
worlds most heavily used search engines. Might as well
stand out in front of IBM and shout it out. >>
calm down, no one has admitted to anything including myself. talk is just
talk. nothing has even been done.
--
My first "real" job was heavily involved with SCO. We (SecureWare) wrote
the C2 subsystem for SCO.
To actually load this software, there should be a blue or pink card with a
serial number on it.
On December 29, Chad Fernandez wrote:
> The other day I found a SCO Open Desktop 2.0.0 media kit, on Qic24
> tape. I don't have the correct drive...... I don't have any tape drive
> experience, actually.
>
> Does anybody have an unneeded Qic24 SCSI tape drive? I checked Ebay and
> I didn't see anything that I thought was what I needed.
Pretty much any drive that reads 60MB DC600A tapes should be able to read
these tapes, but you will need to find a supported controller. I remember
using Wangtek drives & controllers.
> This is going back into a very fuzzy memory...but does anyone know
> if an Archive 2150S drive (QIC-150) will read QIC-24 tapes?
Yup...a 2150S should read these tapes. I'm pretty sure the Adaptec 154x
controllers are supported by the install software.
Ken
My first "real" job was heavily involved with SCO. We (SecureWare) wrote
the C2 subsystem for SCO (among other interesting things).
BTW...To actually load this software, there should be a blue or pink card
with a serial number on it. I don't know if the current free SCO license
covers stuff this old.
On December 29, Chad Fernandez wrote:
> The other day I found a SCO Open Desktop 2.0.0 media kit, on Qic24
> tape. I don't have the correct drive...... I don't have any tape drive
> experience, actually.
>
> Does anybody have an unneeded Qic24 SCSI tape drive? I checked Ebay and
> I didn't see anything that I thought was what I needed.
Pretty much any drive that reads 60MB DC600A tapes should be able to read
these tapes, assuming it has a controller supported by the install program.
I remember using Wangtek and Archive non-SCSI drives & controllers.
> This is going back into a very fuzzy memory...but does anyone know
> if an Archive 2150S drive (QIC-150) will read QIC-24 tapes?
Yup...a 2150S (or 2060S, I suppose) should read these tapes, as will other
SCSI drives that read DC600As. As I recall, the Adaptec 154x controllers
are supported by the install software, among others.
Ken
R. P. Bell said:
> Anybody got any good suggestions on where to go to get a nice SGI Indy, just
> for playing around -- preferably cheap?
Want to tell us where you are or define "cheap"? I thought I saw one
at the local university surplus outlet a coupla weeks ago; don't recall
the price, but I didn't take it home.
Roger Ivie
ivie(a)cc.usu.edu
I just bought a VMS 6.1 media kit (I think):
VMS 6.1 'Binaries and DOc disc'
'COnsolidated software distribution' (Jul 1994)
'Online documentation' (april 1994)
SO, did I score, or did I blow $10?
Jeff
________________________________________________________________
GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO!
Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less!
Join Juno today! For your FREE software, visit:
http://dl.www.juno.com/get/web/.
Supposing one has a farm of older, relatively slower machines (Sun-2's,
Sun-3's, early SPARCs, 386es, very small VAXen, 68k-based Macs, etc.)
running various Unixes (mostly NetBSD), networked together and connected
to the Net. What does one do with it?
I've been trying to think of some interesting, moderately useful
distributed-computing project that they could sit and crank away at
and haven't come up with much of anything. All the distributed projects
that I know of are distributed because even fast machines aren't enough by
themselves -- a trailing-edge farm can't make a useful contribution.
If network Tierra (an artificial-life research project) had ever come to
pass, that would have been a superb application for these beasts. But it
didn't.
Ideas, anyone? Please?
--James B.
In a message dated 12/31/01 12:11:27 AM Eastern Standard Time,
SUPRDAVE(a)aol.com writes:
> I got a bunch of functioning seagate MFM drives available. ST-225,238 and
251
>
> models as well as some big FH models. All survived a LLF too. Controller
> cables also if you need them. Email if interested.
>
Where are they located?
I have 7 Conner CP1080E drives with a sun quick-release mounting bracket on
them. No specs on these drives, so go Google for that. Because the unique
connector, I cannot test these either.
In a message dated 1/1/2002 8:55:44 AM Eastern Standard Time,
wpointon(a)earthlink.net writes:
> i never would have accused you of that -- i am a very patient person --
> i have to be with the lousy slow dialup internet access i am stuck
> with -- if you are referring again to warp 4 server i would love to
> download a copy but if you put it up for ftp you will have to leave it
> up long enough for my max 20 meg/hour speed to get it all -- much
> obliged for your consideration ---- billp
>
> On Tuesday, January 1, 2002, at 01:28 AM, Doc Shipley wrote:
>
> > Y'all thought I blew it off, didn't ya?
> > Several of you asked about it, but I expect the best way to handle it
> > is off-list.
> > ....
> >
> > Doc
> >
>
why not have some duplicate the CD and take it from there? ...
I have access to high speed cd burner and could make duplicates the minute I
get my hands on the cd...
In a message dated 1/1/2002 5:02:04 PM Eastern Standard Time,
wpointon(a)earthlink.net writes:
<< i will volunteer to copy them if no one else has any kind of whiz bang
cd duplicator and can do it quicker -- or we could make this faster with
a tree algorithm -- i will dupe some and send them on to some others who
will dupe them again for more interested parties -- how many interested
parties do we have? ----- thanx - billp
On Tuesday, January 1, 2002, at 04:15 PM, SUPRDAVE(a)aol.com wrote:
> In a message dated 1/1/2002 8:55:44 AM Eastern Standard Time,
> wpointon(a)earthlink.net writes:
>
>
> i never would have accused you of that -- i am a very patient person --
> i have to be with the lousy slow dialup internet access i am stuck
> with -- if you are referring again to warp 4 server i would love to
> download a copy but if you put it up for ftp you will have to leave it
> up long enough for my max 20 meg/hour speed to get it all -- much
> obliged for your consideration ---- billp
>
> On Tuesday, January 1, 2002, at 01:28 AM, Doc Shipley wrote:
>
> > ?Y'all thought I blew it off, didn't ya?
> > ?Several of you asked about it, but I expect the best way to handle it
> > is off-list.
> > ?....
> >
> > ????Doc
> >
>
>
>
> why not have some duplicate the CD and take it from there? ... >>
--
Kwanzaa is NOT a real holiday.
Decided to pull out my amiga 500 and a PHOENIX hard drive that fits it.
plugged it all in and the hard drive spins up, but the amiga still prompts
for a system floppy. can a PC download and create an amiga system disk? i
want to see what this computer is capable of.
--
Kwanzaa is NOT a real holiday.
Dick,
That was a strange one. Now I understand the reference to
it's being dangerous to even have in the car. Actually, I
found many tape backup programs to be unsatisfactory, mostly
because I was getting larger and larger tape drives faster
than the backup software ( that I liked ) was supporting
them. I like PC Tools for disk and file management. I haven't
ever really liked any tape backup software, to the point that
I hardly even like tape drives anymore, and would rather just
backup a hard drive to another hard drive of equal capacity.
Ian
Richard Erlacher wrote:
>
> I gave a fellow a ride to the office once, because his wife needed his car,
> since hers was in the shop. He had, in his briefcase, which he left in the
> car, a copy of the then-current PC-Tools suite, that he'd bought that
> morning at the computer store where I picked him up. At the moment we drove
> into the lot, all the systems in the building went down and wouldn't run
> again until I sent this fellow, together with my car, on an errand to fetch
> some parts, after which the systems all came up and functioned nicely until
> he returned, at which time the whole kit and caboodle crashed again. His
> wife later picked up the copy of PC-Tools from him, and, when she left with
> it, all the systems promptly came back to life and continued to operate
> nominally. This was, BTW, before Windows9x.
>
> >From this, I conclude that it wasn't the car, it wasn't the briefcase, it
> wasn't the guy, but it was that one item that apparently was the index.
>
> Dick
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Ian Koller" <vze2mnvr(a)verizon.net>
> To: <classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org>; "Richard Erlacher" <edick(a)idcomm.com>; "Ben
> Franchuk" <bfranchuk(a)jetnet.ab.ca>
> Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2002 11:33 AM
> Subject: Re: Hep me!! scsi adapter DOS drivers (ot?)
>
> >
> >
> > > But all I want to do is read a CD rom from $#@! DOS!
> >
> > But someone was having problems downloading these ASPI
> > managers from Adaptec's site, so it's a second alternative
> > source. Some might not have realized that if they have the
> > PCTools program, they may already have these drivers, and
> > just not have known it.
> >
> > > Why would anybody use PC-Tools-anything???? It's dangerous
> > > even to have it the car, let alone bringing it inside ...
> >
> > Dick, I used that program for a long time. I never had any
> > problems with it. I found it to be a useful suite of tools
> > for disk and file management in the "DOS" days.
> >
> > > > Why not simply use what ADAPTEC provides?
> >
> > Those ASPI managers were provided by Adaptec. They were the
> > "real deal". Licensed by Central Point Software to be included
> > in the PC Tools package.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Richard Erlacher wrote:
> > >
> >
> > >
> > > Why not simply use what ADAPTEC provides? There's nothing else that
> does
> > > the job better, though there are MANY driver sets that do it worse,
> notably
> > > the stuff from IOMEGA.
> > >
> > > Dick
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Ian Koller" <vze2mnvr(a)verizon.net>
> > > To: <classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org>; "Ben Franchuk"
> <bfranchuk(a)jetnet.ab.ca>;
> > > "Ron Hudson" <rhudson(a)cnonline.net>
> > > Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2002 9:26 AM
> > > Subject: Re: Hep me!! scsi adapter DOS drivers (ot?)
> > > >
> > > > It's been a while, so I may not be remembering correctly,
> > > > but I think PC Tools had a series of Adaptec ASPI drivers
> > > > with it, probably to support the backup program ( to SCSI
> > > > tape drives ).
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Ben Franchuk wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Ron Hudson wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --probably off topic...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I am not sure of the age of the board but
> > > > > > Adaptec seems to think it's not supportable
> > > > > > any more... :^(
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Anybody have DOS ASPI drivers for the
> > > > > > ADAPTEC AHA-1542CF??
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Tis an ISA scsi card with floppy attach
> > > > > > and I have it in a 486 machine
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ----------------------------------
> > > > > > The machine seems to be a 486dx in a "lunchbox"
> > > > > > style case with color lcd. looks like a normal
> > > > > > motherboard is inside..
> > > > > >
> > > > > > goes by the name of PCIII, with no other markings
> > > > > > as to MFG.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Any one know anything about this?
> > > > >
> > > > > Don't look at me... I still have my 1542 in this PC here
> > > > > and no drivers.I could use the 'dos' drivers to read a CDROM just in
> > > > > case
> > > > > 95 crashes and I need to reload windows.
> > > > > --
> > > > > Ben Franchuk - Dawn * 12/24 bit cpu *
> > > > > www.jetnet.ab.ca/users/bfranchuk/index.html
> > > >
> > > >
> >
> >
On January 1, jeff.kaneko(a)juno.com wrote:
> I just bought a VMS 6.1 media kit (I think):
>
> VMS 6.1 'Binaries and DOc disc'
> 'COnsolidated software distribution' (Jul 1994)
> 'Online documentation' (april 1994)
>
>
> SO, did I score, or did I blow $10?
I'd say you scored...the CSD is very cool to have, even if 6.1 is a
little old.
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire
St. Petersburg, FL "Less talk. More synthohol." --Lt. Worf
http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=1315144257
I believe this is the part number that will fit the VAXStation 4000 m90, and
maybe a few others. Still nearly two days to go. A few price points: Last
I heard, dealers were buying at ~$1(US)/MB. My 1st 64MB kit was ~$68, and
my second 64MB kit was ~$48.
Bob
On January 1, John Allain wrote:
> > ...Marconi, become the "inventor of Radio" which we
> > are now celebrating, despite the fact that Tesla won
> > a court decision ...
>
> One book I have (I think it was written in the 1930's, when the
> people who knew the history were Alive) suggested that Radio
> was Discovered rather than invented. Some people were
> working on well calibrated Telegraph equipment and noticed
> that they could get signals from a loop that wasn't physically
> connected to the recieving loop. This of course set of alot of
> peoples' curiosity going and led to directed experimentation
> and then the Science only much later.
This is a very interesting piont...I think there's a pretty clear line
between invention and discovering a phenomenon and then devising a way
to control or take advantage of it.
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire
St. Petersburg, FL "Less talk. More synthohol." --Lt. Worf
>If WE use the wrong term
>amongst ourselves, we'll certainly never show others that there's benefit in
>calling it a crescent wrench when, to some folks, "the silver-colored
>thingie," would do.
But, given the arguments that have been going on, you shouldn't call it a
Crescent wrench either. That is the name of the manufacturer of a
particular kind of wrench, and although generally accepted as meaning an
"adjustable wrench" is not any more technically correct than the
"Centronics" connector's name.
If you ask some mechanics for a crescent wrench, you might get locking
pliers... ones that are commonly called a "Vise Grip", which is ALSO
technically incorrect for the same reason Crescent is wrong.
But then, for the question of the century... if you strictly adhere to
calling an item by its name, and NOT by the commonly used term, which in
many cases is the manufacturer's or common usage name... what should you
call a Yo-Yo? (just seeing how many people know the answer to this one)
-chris
<http://www.mythtech.net>