I've got one (S-1255 about the size of a 2 drawer file cabinet)! But I've got
no documentation on it or on any of its multibus boards. Does anybody have any
info on it (or any 68k based wicat hardware)?
Regards,
Bill Morgart
morgarws(a)molbio.sbphrd.com
Does anyone have any information on the type 6360 drive? It was
originally part of a word processor. It has one 37 pin female DB, one 25
pin male DB and AC.
Thanks
Charlie Fox
Chas E. Fox Video Productions
793 Argyle Rd. Windsor ON N8Y 3J8
foxvideo(a)wincom.net
Check out:
The Old Walkerville Virtual Museum at http://skyboom.com/foxvideo
and Camcorder Kindergarten at http://chasfoxvideo.com
Dick:
Indeed. I'd prefer to stick with the Intel nemonics since the source
files that I have to compile, er, assemble, use the Intel nemonics.
Rich
-----Original Message-----
From: Richard Erlacher [mailto:edick@idcomm.com]
Sent: Friday, February 23, 2001 2:39 AM
To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org
Subject: Re: 8080 Complier Recommendation
The mnemonics are quite different for the Z80, though. I think he wants to
stick with the Intel mnemonics, which are quite different from Zilog's and
which
some folks find somewhat easier to decipher.
Dick
----- Original Message -----
From: "Edwin P. Groot" <epgroot(a)ucdavis.edu>
To: <classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org>
Sent: Friday, February 23, 2001 12:08 AM
Subject: Re: 8080 Complier Recommendation
> Are you talking about an ::assembler::? If so, Z-80 doesn't matter as
> an assembler for the 8080, since Z-80 is a superset of 8080. Just don't
use
> the Z-80 - specific opcodes. TASM reminds me of Borland Turbo Assembler.
> With regards to a higher-level language compiler, there might be
> directives to specify 8080 or Z-80 opcodes in the object file.
>
> Edwin
>
> At 16:02 2/22/01 -0500, you wrote:
> >Hello, all:
> >
> > Does anyone have a "favorite" compiler recommendation for the 8080?
> >I have TASM, which I like for the 6502, but it only does the Z80, which
has
> >different opcodes. Thanks.
> >
> >Rich Cini
>
>
Hello, all:
Does anyone have a "favorite" compiler recommendation for the 8080?
I have TASM, which I like for the 6502, but it only does the Z80, which has
different opcodes. Thanks.
Rich Cini
http://highgate.comm.sfu.ca/~rcini/classiccmp/
Dick:
I misspoke. I do indeed need an assembler.
I had just finished using VC++ when I wrote that email :-)
Rich
==========================
Richard A. Cini, Jr.
Congress Financial Corporation
1133 Avenue of the Americas
30th Floor
New York, NY 10036
(212) 545-4402
(212) 840-6259 (facsimile)
-----Original Message-----
From: Richard Erlacher [mailto:edick@idcomm.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2001 8:03 PM
To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org
Subject: Re: 8080 Complier Recommendation
First of all, TASM isn't a compiler is it? The versions of TASM I have are
a
set of table-driven assemblers for a number of microcontrollers and
microprocessors. I personally like the CP/M (Digital Research) MASM
assembler,
which I've had since Christ was a corporal and I use it under the Z80MU CP/M
emulator, though that's not a requirement. You could, of course use any of
a
number of CP/M emulators, of which I imagine almost all CP/M-ers have at
least
two favorites.
If you're looking for a compiler that supports the 8080, you need an older
version of AZTEC 'C' (assuming that compiler means 'C' compiler to you)
which is
very similar, I'm told, to the CC65 for the 6502. There are, of course,
countless others. One notable free compiler is the HiTech (Pacific) 'C'
compiler for the Z80, of which there's also a free version for the PC. Most
of
the oldies are written to the K & R vision of 'C' rather than ANSI, which
didn't
have a standard back in the '80's.
Dick
----- Original Message -----
From: "Cini, Richard" <RCini(a)congressfinancial.com>
To: "'ClassCompList'" <classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org>
Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2001 2:02 PM
Subject: 8080 Complier Recommendation
> Hello, all:
>
> Does anyone have a "favorite" compiler recommendation for the 8080?
> I have TASM, which I like for the 6502, but it only does the Z80, which
has
> different opcodes. Thanks.
>
> Rich Cini
> http://highgate.comm.sfu.ca/~rcini/classiccmp/
>
>
On February 22, Mike Ford wrote:
> My "guess" is the type 5 is just too new for a 2.
Oh good grief. I've used type5 keyboards on Sun3/50s.
-Dave McGuire
Here's a partial list of what I've got....
These are all for Series 800:
Apps for HP-UX 9.0
Core OS 9.04
Support & Install 9.04
These I'm not sure right now:
Docs v. 10.x
Extensions Date 3726
Extensions Date 3710, 3620
Apps for 10.2 date 3710
Apps ('96) for 9.0
Clintrial 3.3.2
Core OS 10.20 for 700/800
Apps from '98
These are just from the scribbled notes I have. I will try to make a
full, detailed list Monday night and then we can figure out how best
to distribute them. I've had quite a few responses, and I want to see
everyone have a chance. Basically, I just want people to like
me...;o)
I'm thinking the disk sharing idea is good. I don't know if you can
do a direct copy of one of these....would Easy-CD see it as just an
audio cd and copy it accordingly?
That would be a project for someone other than me.
Talk to you Monday.
Paul Braun WD9GCO
Cygnus Productions
nerdware_nospam(a)laidbak.com
"A computer without a Microsoft operating system is like a dog without a bunch of bricks tied to its head."
Hi
I got the Sparc2 a few weeks ago and cant get it to see the type5 keyboard I have to try it out with.
I only have that one keyboard to test this so I don't know if there is a problem with the keyboard, sparc2, or its just that a type5 does not work on a sparc2.
When I power on the keyboard, the leds flash on the keyboard (power ok to keyboard) , but I get a message on the sparc it cant ID the keyboard.
I am suspecting the serial line trans/receiver chips for the keyboard serial line maybe have gone bad on the sparc, is that a frequent failure? Ill probe with a scope if I have to...
Also I have a mouse model4 (or type 4?) can the special mouse pad for these be substituted by something else?
Claude
