please see embedded remarks below.
Dick
-----Original Message-----
From: Tony Duell <ard(a)p850ug1.demon.co.uk>
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Date: Friday, October 29, 1999 12:21 PM
Subject: Re: HELP! ( totally OT) - Hitachi Monitor problem
>> >Hey _I'm_ the one that flames about not being able to get service
>> >information for everything I own. Last time I ranted on about this you
>> >pointed out a number of good reasons why such information might not be
>> >available.
>> >
>> It's like getting the service manual for a car of the same vintage,
except
>> that when a car is this old, it's just starting to cause little problems
and
>> the third-party repair manuals are available everywhere. In the
electronics
>
>ALthough to be fair, most of the 3rd party car shop manuals are a waste
>of space. Having been caught out a couple of times, I now always work
>from the factory manual. It costs a bit more, but...
>
Agreed, though the original from the mfg is normally only available during
the first year or two of ownership. I have the Nissan manual for my Maxima,
though it was nine years old before I needed it. Frankly, I bought a 3rd
party manual only because I couldn't find the original.
>
>> business, there have never been really decent repair manuals from 3rd
>> parties, except maybe for TV's, of which I've never had one break.
>> Unfortunately, as the prices of these commodities drop, the level of
>> expectation to which the vendors respond drops as well. These days, you
can
>> get a really decent 20" monitor for $400 or less. When it breaks, it's
>> unlikely you'll get anyone to fix it for less than the price of a new
one.
>
>Except that in a lot of cases the old (and expensive when new) monitor
>(or whatever) is built a _lot_ better than the modern 'replacemnt' (and
>it may well give better performance as well -- a lot of modern monitors
>have terrible convergence, etc).
>
>I guess I'm strange, but I'd rather repair something that was once great
>than replace it with something that could never be as good...
>
Yes, but new monitors these days have flat screens and are VERY sharp and
VERY linear, unlike the large-screen multisync displays of yesteryear. The
fixed frequency varieties which are so difficult to use for anything useful
are the outgrowth of this. Instead of making an "average" monitor with the
ability to sync at several sweep rates displaying appropriate resolutions,
they made one which was VERY linear and VERY well focused and converged at a
single frequency and let the boardmakers benefit from that.
>
>>
>> If you want a schematic of a 7-year-old TV set, I doubt it's readily
>> available either. I've never had a monitor repaired successfully by a
>
>Hmm... In the UK there were books produced every year of TV schematics. I
>have an almost-complete set from 1952 to 1981 (!) -- these ones cover
>radios, tape recorders, etc as well. And beleive-it-or-not, many public
>libraries have at least some of them available.
>
>So finding the schematic of a 7 year old TV (which is not an old set
>IMHO) would not be a big problem.
>
>There are also companies who sell copies of old service manuals, for just
>about anything. I got the manuals for the Sony 'Rover' portable
>reel-to-reel video recorder and camera a few months back. That thing is
>over 25 years old, but there was no problem in getting a service manual,
>although Sony could no longer supply it.
>
>Said company does sell computer (mostly home micro) and monitor service
>manuals (I got the Sharp MZ80B manual + schematics from them). But
>obviously they can only supply manuals if the manufacturer of the device
>has produced them (and has given permission for them to be reproduced, I
>guess).
>
>There are some books of computer monitor circuits available, and then
>later they produced similar information on CD-ROM (basically just scans
>of the manuals). I found the latter to be painful to use, but the former
>are actually very useful. Even if your monitor isn't in there, there's
>likely to be something that's similar.
>
>> "professional" working at an "authorized" repair center. I sent in a
very
>
>I've never met a 'professional' who could repair anythign of mine. Why
>do you think I fix everything myself :-)...
>
Hear! Hear! ...
>
>[...]
>
>> >Although it's hard to imagine anything particularly clever/unusual in a
>> >standard colour monitor. Most monitors that I've worked on use pretty
>> >much standard circuitry.
>> >
>> That's what puzzles me about the color displays I have sitting about.
There
>> aren't many that look even remotely similar beyond the most superficial
>> observation. Not one has a flyback transformer, and all the
>> current-generation multisync types use some encapsulated device about
4x6x1"
>> or so to effect the power management functions.
>
>Hmm... In my experiece most single-freqeuncy monitors still use a
>traditional flyback transformer. I say 'most' because there are one or
>two that I have that use an independant EHT supply.
>
>As soon as you get to multiple scan rates (even just for EGA), it makes
>life a lot easier if you separate the EHT generator and the Horizontal
>output. EHT still comes from a 'flyback transformer' but it's not
>connected to the HOT. It has its own driver transistor. Both the HOT and
>the EHT-transformer output transistor are driven by the horizontal
>oscillator but the supply to the output stage (normally) is separately
>controllerd. This allows non-interacting EHT regulation and width
>control, I guess.
>
I wish I knew as much about these things as you, but I've stuck with the
circuits inside the computer, and allowed others, (obviously) to worry the
problems with monitors. I learned at an early age, that punched and screwed
chassis take skin of hands (or whatever else you have on their far side) as
you try to get away from the "bite" of the HV lurking inside.
>
>No idea what modern multisync-with-power-save+... do. I've never had the
>misfortune to have to really repair one. The couple I have fixed have had
>obvious faults that I could sort out without a schematic and without
>understanding how the unit really works. You know, faults like dry joints
>on the CRT base.
>
Unfortunately those are commone enough to motivate even me to look inside.
>
>-tony
>
Some potentially interesting stuff for rescue in the Utah area.
Please reply off-list to the original poster
-jim
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>From: pmarzolf(a)juno.com
>Date: Wed, 27 Oct 1999 11:11:22 -0600
>Subject: Old computer stuff
>X-Mailer: Juno 3.0.13
>X-Status:
>
>I am the oldest programer still programming
>in the basic language.
>
>Through the years of programing I have collected
>alot of computer stuff. It starts with programes
>written for LGP-30 in 1956.
>
>I can't find anyone except the dump for all this
>stuff. I guess my problem is it is not on the
>west coast. If you or you know any one that
>would be interested I would like to hear from
>them.
>
>Paul V Marzolf
>2761 Morningside Dr.
>Salt Lake City, Ut 84124
>Email
>pmarzolf(a)juno.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
jimw(a)computergarage.org
The Computer Garage - http://www.computergarage.org
Computer Garage Fax - (503) 646-0174
<Wrong... (I think). My memory may be hazy but...
<The VT132 (and 131 I believe) both were capable of block mode.
<The 132 (I thought) was a 102 with block mode, AVO and Printer port
<capability.
Might be right, though I thought that was the VT161/2. there were a lot
of "flavors" of those.
<The VT131 had Block mode, STP, AVO done the old way... All three
<options and different roms.
<
<The 132 was a cost reduced 131 based on the 102 which came standard
<with 24 lines of 132 (without AVO) -- It was built in the standard
<VT102 logic board.
Thats it.
<The VT101 was a 102 without the AVO memory (I think) and was the bottom
<of the line VT10x in cost.
Yep!
<I think the 102 and 132 allows hardware flow control like the VT220.
Actually they all did. it was called restraint mode (pin 19 or 21)
I'd have to look).
<There were some interesting illegal (and legal) escape codes that did
<interesting different bugs to the VT100, 101 and 102 based on their
<setup settings. One of these bugs caused hell for VT102 and 101 users
<when the EDT program slowed their scrolling down to a crawl back around
<VMS 3.2 or so.
Ah yep. Remember the fix, VT52mode. Then came the group that produced
the Video SRM and later the printers SRMs (DEC STDs). the goal was to not
break anything and have compatability that made sense for later products.
Allison
<Could the VT103 supply handle the load of this stuff...?
<Hmmm...
Mine can... (not the standard part!)
<Is Bernie still around?
<I'd love to make ZCPR2 and ZCPR3 for the Rainbow available to the net
<but I'd need his ok...
Don't know. I've not been around DEC for 6 years. Didn't he copyleft
those version of ZCPR (ZCPR was copyleft itself!).
Allison
<I do. I always wanted to turn it into a semi-portable UNIX machine
<
<> It's a VT100 with a 4-slot Q-bus backplane inside (!).
Actually it was 3 quad wide or 6 AB slots.
<Some even had TU-58's in the front.
Never. that was a PDT11/130 that was demoted to a Vt100 then had one of two
possible backplanes installed. The 11/130 TU58 would ahve the board
swaped out was it was the ONLY parallel version and the rest were serial.
<> There's a paddleboard in
<> the STP slot that links to 2 ports on a DLV11-J (4-port RS232) card in
<> the backplane.
<
<*That* I don't have. :-(
Not required just means different cables. The STP card interconneccted
the VT100 but you could to that with a cable from the VT100 DB25 to a
MXV11 or DLV11j just as easily.
<> The VT100 becomes the console for whatever processor you
<> stick in the Q-bus, while the connector on the back is a normal serial
<> port, also on the Q-bus system...
If you have that STP card. Otherwise it's just a console and you use a
modem program to (VTcom, Vterm).
<For compact systems, the MXV-11 also works with the paddle card - two port
<and some memory.
MXV11 x2 gets you 32kW, 4 serial ports and boot roms plus a cpu card is a
system. The only other card would be a RXV11 or RXV21 (or similar)
for a floppy. The TU58 if you have one of the cases with it uses a serial
port and the MXV11s (x2) will certainly provide that.
Another config is KDF11A (11/23 m8186), one or two 256k cards (q22),
DLV11J (4 serial ports), M8212 (boot) and a RXV21 (or RQDX3).
With Qbus 11s you can slice and dice it a lot of ways.
Allison
Effective immediately I am shedding the <dastar(a)wco.com> e-mail address.
My primary and sole e-mail address is now <sellam(a)siconic.com>.
Please use <sellam(a)siconic.com> for all your future e-mails.
Thank you.
Sellam International Man of Intrique and Danger
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Looking for a six in a pile of nines...
VCF East? VCF Europe!? YOU BETCHA!!
Stay tuned for more information
or contact me to find out how you can participate
http://www.vintage.org
[This message has also been posted.]
First a short summary, Something I have been giving for
awhile, I got a free Vt180 terminal. AT least Thats what It says on
the front. but on the back on the nameplate it says its aa Vt100-AA! I
am wondering if the AVO and the Secondary Processor part (STP) was
added later on. It works GREAT as a vt100 but I have ran into a few
brick walls trying to find a EK-vt100-UG Vt100 Users Guide. I can order
it from Digital/Compaq for $25 but I rather not dip into my grocery
money for a technical manual. I have not found out anything on how
to set the printer up on it. or how to use the Vt180 part of it. or
for that matter, how do I RIP that OUT! if I cannot get a boot disk
for it... its worthless anyway. Here is my questions. Please help me
best you can here:
1. what is Advanced Video Option (AVO) and how do I use it?
2. If the STP is the VT180 part how do I REMOVE it! *if I want
plain Vt100, while maintaining AVO)
3. How do I use a printer on a VT100 and how do I set printer
baud rates and parity, Stop bits
3. What are the part numbers for the manuals I need for this
sucker? I know of the EK-VT100-UG and the EK-VT100-RC but what do I
need for the advanced video option? STP (VT180? part)
4. What is the Graphics option? can I still get one? is that
for bit mapped graphics? howis it used? can the graphics be used via
Linux with graphics display utility or a plotting program (gnupplot).
5. can any of this info be located on the internet? Do I need
to go hungry by ordering over $200 in US dollars worth of manuals (I
only get $686 each month due to my legal blindness, that goes for
rent, Electric, Gas, phone and food. My rent is $350.00 btw.
6. who has the sticker (in sticker form) that goes on the
bottom of the vt100 keyboard showing the setup B screen and I/O toggle
possitions.
7. How do I make the Needed cable to connect to the external
floppy drive unit? Db37 to Db25? what is the pinouts or wiring to
make this cable.
8. Since it has Composite In and Composite out. Does it have a
built in genlock allowing me to at least use the Vt100 to do titling
and captions; then sending the output to a second Video Recording
unit. if titleing is not possible, what is Composite video IN for??
I tried to find this info for over 2 weeks, on Webcrawler,
Infoseeek, Lycos, Altavista, Lycos (ftp search), Ask Jeeves, hotbot and
what I have gotten is very sketchy at best. All I really NEED at this
time is a a copy of the needed manuals in either Postscript or PDF
format. or good ole HTML.. Finding the pin outs of the Vt180 cable are
non-existant, as is sources of Vt180 boot disk images.
While we are on the issue of DEC stuff. Who has the full list
of the Control Codes for the Rainbow 100's terminal mode? How come
when I fire up CP/M Modem7 or 8? I can use the Previous Screen/Next
Screen keys and yet in the ROM Vt100 emulation Neither key works? Is
there a good program for CPM 86/80 that allows the use or the extraa
keys to be sent to Linux? such as HELP, DO, HOME, Insert, Delete Next
Screen and Previous Screen? what is the Ansi codes sent by these
keys?? I need something that handles 9600 bps with proper flow
control. the "Modem" program for CP/M does NOT seem to work well at
9600 as it drops characters often.
--
A pearl of wisdom from the y2K newsgroups:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Y2K appears to be the Baby Boomers mid-life crisis, and it has the
potential to be a dandy.
-- Anonymnous --
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
B'ichela
<A VT125 is a STP board that is also called a Graphics processor board.
It's not a STP board. the stp board is a little bord used to interconnet
the two or (technically) a printer buffer board.
The VT125 option ( have two) is a double board set that adds in like the
VT180 card and is the same size overall as a VT100 card (that also has to be
present).
I know, the engineering group I was with was formerly the TERMINALS and
PRINTERS people at DEC. Later it became two distinct groups.
I still keep a hybrid VT100 that has VT125, VT180 and PDT11/130(the VT180
card and the PDT can be swapped in a moment as both would cook the PS nor
woth the fit!) in the same case. Definately not factory but it allows me
to have something that is a genuine VT100 for those times when nothing else
will do.
I think Bernie, me and a few odd people had real VT185s. They were scarce.
The reason was the interconnect card (different STP card than plain
VT100/VT180) was needed and I don't think it ever got to production.
Allison
>
>
> --- Tony Duell <ard(a)p850ug1.demon.co.uk> wrote:
> > There's a thing called a VT103 (which I don't have :-().
>
> I do. I always wanted to turn it into a semi-portable UNIX machine
>
> > It's a VT100 with a 4-slot Q-bus backplane inside (!).
I've got an unused one sitting in the garage. I've got some docs
somewhere on how to rewire the backplane for uVaxII's.
> > There's a paddleboard in
> > the STP slot that links to 2 ports on a DLV11-J (4-port RS232) card in
> > the backplane.
>
> *That* I don't have. :-(
Ah yesss... I'm not sure if there's one in mine.
Bill
---
bpechter@shell.monmouth.com|pechter@pechter.dyndns.org
Three things never anger: First, the one who runs your DEC,
The one who does Field Service and the one who signs your check.
--- Tony Duell <ard(a)p850ug1.demon.co.uk> wrote:
> There's a thing called a VT103 (which I don't have :-().
I do. I always wanted to turn it into a semi-portable UNIX machine
> It's a VT100 with a 4-slot Q-bus backplane inside (!).
Some even had TU-58's in the front.
> There's a paddleboard in
> the STP slot that links to 2 ports on a DLV11-J (4-port RS232) card in
> the backplane.
*That* I don't have. :-(
> The VT100 becomes the console for whatever processor you
> stick in the Q-bus, while the connector on the back is a normal serial
> port, also on the Q-bus system...
For compact systems, the MXV-11 also works with the paddle card - two ports
and some memory.
-ethan
=====
Infinet has been sold. The domain is going away in February.
Please send all replies to
erd(a)iname.com
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Bid and sell for free at http://auctions.yahoo.com