><competitor. Most Windows CE devices run off of UNIX-style processors, a
>
>What's a unix style processor?
>
>
>Allison
A processor from a company who's highest-end products are UNIX based, and a
similiar version (IE in the same family, such as Pentium is in the x86
family). Most Windows CE devices are based on HP/NEC PA-RISC (IIRC)
processors, or SGI MIPS processors.
Ciao,
Tim
>I've got two Digital RZ23 3.5" SCSI drives I'd like to find some more
>info on. I basically need the specs (cylinder, head, size, etc.) and
>jumper settings. Anyone got anything?
If you go to Seagate's website (www.seagate.com) you can find pages for
conner drives... it'll have graphics which show the positions of jumpers.
Megan Gentry
Former RT-11 Developer
+--------------------------------+-------------------------------------+
| Megan Gentry, EMT/B, PP-ASEL | Internet (work): gentry(a)zk3.dec.com |
| Unix Support Engineering Group | (home): mbg(a)world.std.com |
| Digital Equipment Corporation | |
| 110 Spitbrook Rd. ZK03-2/T43 | URL: http://world.std.com/~mbg/ |
| Nashua, NH 03062 | "pdp-11 programmer - some assembler |
| (603) 884 1055 | required." - mbg |
+--------------------------------+-------------------------------------+
<I remember back in '98 when Doug Yowza wrote:
<> The Z8000. The iAPX432. Parallel processing. Voice recognition.
< ^^^^^^^
<So you actually posess a 432 based machine? Impressive. I have only
<really heard about them in literature. Always sounded interesting.
I have Intel docs for them. Old now, like early 80s.
Allison
<I've got two Digital RZ23 3.5" SCSI drives I'd like to find some more inf
<on. I basically need the specs (cylinder, head, size, etc.) and jumper
<settings. Anyone got anything?
The RZ23 (there are two different ones) are either 105 or 120mb SCSI
drives. The group of three(6pins, arranged 2x3) are the address.
Check the various vax archives for more specs.
Allison
<Would it be possible to have a control chip and a OS chip? You've got th
<control chip, which contains address information on the OS chip, as well
<other EXTREMELY basic ssytem info. Then you've got the OS chip, which
<contains the OS. Because of the control chip, it could be as large as yo
<wanted it.
Check out the IRMX-86 and the 8213x chips... beenthere done that about
12-14 years ago.
However in real life OS is software and control is CPU so that logical
partition is the norm for most CPUs. It's generally in RAM but as noted
there are plenty with bom based kernals and OSs.
Allison
<u have a GRiD Compass with bubble memory, you get an OS
<that acts like it's in ROM, but bubbles are writable.
Lessee here.
My supercrate s100 has CPM/BIOS/Monitor in rom. takes about 3sec to
selfcheck and boot.
I have an s100 crate with a 2mb write once romdisk of my design.
I also have a z80 system with an two intel BPK72 bubble memories on.
Each one give 128kb of space.
All easily predate the GRID.
Allison
Would it be possible to have a control chip and a OS chip? You've got the
control chip, which contains address information on the OS chip, as well as
other EXTREMELY basic ssytem info. Then you've got the OS chip, which
contains the OS. Because of the control chip, it could be as large as you
wanted it.
I've also heard of a "Windows 98 on a chip" system, with 75MBPS through
put. Sounds like the first decent way to load Windows...
Ciao,
Tim D. Hotze
PS-Did any computers have GUI's built in? I think that I recall that a
Tandy did, but nothing else...
-----Original Message-----
From: Pete Turnbull <pete(a)dunnington.u-net.com>
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Date: Saturday, June 27, 1998 2:09 PM
Subject: Re: OS's In ROM's (was: Re: Mac Classic prob (was Macintoshes...))
>On Jun 26, 21:15, Hotze wrote:
>> I LOVE that idea. Now, it'd need to be EPROM, especially nowadays with
>bug
>> fixes, a new version every other day of the week, etc. but still, it's a
>way
>> cool concept. Which computers did this?
>
>Acorn's RISC PC has the OS (RISC OS 3.7) in ROM, about 4MB IIRC. The
>original Archimedes range (1987) had RISC OS 2.0 in ROM (512K, IIRC).
> Usually they're mask ROMs or OTPROMs. The OS is structured as a series of
>about 80 relocatable modules, so if an upgrade is required, you load the
>relevant replacement module into RAM, and the kernel changes the links that
>point to it. Of course, changing the kernel module itself is a little more
>tricky, but it can be done -- the first RISC OS 2 upgrades had instructions
>on how to boot the system from a disk to load a new "utility module".
>
>--
>
>Pete Peter Turnbull
> Dept. of Computer Science
> University of York
On Jun 26, 23:31, Ward Donald Griffiths III wrote:
> Yes, LaTeX. Since it can actually be translated to other forms. A .PDF
> is more or less a bitmap picture of what used to be text and is usually
> unreadable -- Hell, last week at work I got an email with a .PDF
> attachment that included the icon where the document said "examine the
> attached bitmap" left over from its Word origin, but for some reason
> clicking on that icon in the .PDF doesn't bring up the full picture.
No, PDF is more-or-less PostScript. However, *some* PDF documents actually
include scanned images, which of course are usually bitmaps because the
creator didn't OCR them. Both PostScript and PDF files can contain text,
vector graphics, and bitmap graphics.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
On Jun 26, 21:15, Hotze wrote:
> I LOVE that idea. Now, it'd need to be EPROM, especially nowadays with
bug
> fixes, a new version every other day of the week, etc. but still, it's a
way
> cool concept. Which computers did this?
Acorn's RISC PC has the OS (RISC OS 3.7) in ROM, about 4MB IIRC. The
original Archimedes range (1987) had RISC OS 2.0 in ROM (512K, IIRC).
Usually they're mask ROMs or OTPROMs. The OS is structured as a series of
about 80 relocatable modules, so if an upgrade is required, you load the
relevant replacement module into RAM, and the kernel changes the links that
point to it. Of course, changing the kernel module itself is a little more
tricky, but it can be done -- the first RISC OS 2 upgrades had instructions
on how to boot the system from a disk to load a new "utility module".
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
>I think cost had something to do with it, too.
Cost shouldn't have anything to do with innovation. It's really a bummer.
>BTW, I enjoy collecting over-hyped innovations that never quite caught on
>in the way they were supposed to: Bubbles. Pen-based computers. Touch
>screens. Wireless networks. Bob. MSX. Robots. AI. Home automation.
>The Z8000. The iAPX432. Parallel processing. Voice recognition.
Pen-based computers, although not a BOOMING success, have had a limited
success. Their gaining momentum, too. Robots? Once again, go into a
factory. You'll see them at work. BTW, how rare are Androbots? Wireless
networks? I've seen a fwe. But I'd like more tech behind them. Bob? He
was way cool. Then he died out. Too bad. AI is very much in a state of
recession, as early depressions in the 80's took all the hype out of it. I
say that we saw the last of current AI's with Deep Blue last year. They'll
come back, but not until 64-bit is standard. Voice recognitions much the
same as AI, but with a little more life, as it actually has some practical
applications that are already partially-functional.
>What did I miss?
Bunches of processors, lots of RAM designs, some cool hard disk systems, and
PC/TV integration.
>-- Doug
Tim D. Hotze