> 'The DMA address extension register is a 4*4 register file
>chip (74LS670) at location <U whatever>. It supplies the top 4 bits
>of the system 20 bit address during DMA cycles. Unlike the
>segmentation scheme used by the CPU, the extensions address is not a
>16 bit segment address which is added to the address from the DMA
>controller. Therefore, DMA operations cannot cross 64K boundaries',
I can half-understand that, but if you read those urban legends about a
guy calling tech support because the power went out in his block (I've
had personal experience - my mom thinks there is a significant
difference between a TV and monitor as far as cleaning solution is
concerned), I sometimes wonder how these people learn to walk :)
>
>Now remember the PERQ again, and think back to the start of this (long)
>thread. The PERQ happens to be the first commercial machine that would
>now be classed as a workstation. For that reason alone it should not be
>forgotten. But few people have ever heard of it (OK, not on this list
>since I do go on about it :-)), or seen one. Which comes back to the
>original point. Where should the average man in the street go to see
the
>machines that led up to the PC he's now using (I'll assume Windows, if
>only because it's the most common OS).
The average man in England might get your book, the average man in the
US doesn't have time. Most people just _don't have time_ to learn about
curiosities, especially when such complex, multidimensional concepts are
involved. And so many people already have learned to use their computers
mechanically (I just turned it on and it always loaded WordPerfect...)
that such knowledge would have nowhere to go. I've seen some of my
classmate have trouble understanding how muscles work, because they
_just do_. Also, the economic forces that partly drove this stuff could
never be understood by the naive American. To bring this long rambling
to a close, I don't think many people would understand such a history,
though that does not mean that we shouldn't try to make them ;)
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
<Voice recognition?? This is still evolving and has just become viable i
<the last year or so. It works in a more than limited fashion, and is onl
Still evolving but usable systems are getting near 10 years old! I cite
DRAGON Dictate.
However user independent is far away.
<many different fields. MSX was a standard that was around for a time in
<Europe and Japan. Thankfully it didn't catch on in the U.S. or stick
<around, but like CP/M it kinda faded. Home automation is an evolving ar
MSX was replace like CPM with dos and winders.
Allison
I'm just wondering - what DO you use these machines for? I guess you
must have been doing it for a long time if you're using classics for it.
Also, I think you should at least have an inventory of the manuals, and
an inventory of each machine, ie
Apple //c
=1 computer
=1 monitor //c
=1 AC adapter
=1 'getting started' guide
etc, etc. That way, if you give the machine to someone, you won't leave
anything out.
>That could never work for me. I have a 'working' collection - machines
>are often being used for real-world tasks (I don't really have a
>non-classic computer), they're being investigated, hacked, tweaked,
>repaired,etc. So machines rarely stay in the same place for very long.
>
>And while I have shelf after shelf of manuals, many of them are open on
>my workbench, near this PC, etc. They're in _use_.
>
>-tony
>
>
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
Can anyone point this guy in the direction of heaps of old computer
catalogs?
Reply-to: Ferock(a)aol.com
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 1998 15:18:00 EDT
From: Ferock(a)aol.com
To: vcf(a)siconic.com
Subject: computer catalogs
I enjoyed reading your web page. I'm also interested in old computers and old
computer equipment. I collect old (1980-1990) computer catalogs. I'm
especially interested in Black Box and Amp catalogs. If you know anyone who
is interested in selling these items, I would greatly appreciate it if you
send me an e-mail. Thanks in advance.
Glenn
I guess I missed that one. Wasn't particularly useful, though versions
were used as Packard Bell's "Navigator" and a popular game called "Myst"
;)
>Bob was touted by Microsoft as the way user interfaces would work from
>that point on. It was seen as a way to bring computers to mere
consumers,
>and launched at CES with great fanfare IIRC.
>
If you use a keyboard. Imagine a touch screen keyboard that reconfigured
itself for your task, and had an enzyme coating that broke down your
skin oils to prevent stains (you'd have to take breaks, of course, to
prevent skin from drying out), like in Star Trek:The Next Generation.
It's farfetched, but I doubt we'll use mechanical keyboard forever.
>Touch screens make you take your hands off the keyboard and leave a
greasy
>mess on your screen while you try in vain to do high resolution tasks
with
>your low res finger.
Can you type while you're buried inside a router closet trying to check
network cables? I sure can't...
>Even in humans, voice recognition isn't great. That's why there are so
>many different words for "huh?". You'll always be able to communicate
>with your computer faster and more accurately with a keyboard.
Supercomputers are becoming less and less common because as things get
cheaper, it's no longer 'super' but 'high-power', and in two years,
'entry-level'. AI works best in parallel, so do simulations like the
ones India didn't want to stick to.
>The supercomputer tar pits are littered with the remains of parallel
>processing companies. They go fast only for a relatively small subset
of
>programs.
>
>-- Doug
>
>
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
I LOVE that idea. Now, it'd need to be EPROM, especially nowadays with bug
fixes, a new version every other day of the week, etc. but still, it's a way
cool concept. Which computers did this?
Ciao,
Tim
-----Original Message-----
From: Zane H. Healy <healyzh(a)ix.netcom.com>
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Date: Friday, June 26, 1998 9:22 AM
Subject: Re: Mac Classic prob (was Macintoshes...)
>>> The Mac Classic contains a complete System 6 installation in ROM that
>>> you can boot from. Sorry but I don't have the docs handy, but I think
>>> if you press Command-Option-Shift-X on startup, it'll boot from the
>>> ROM. Another way that should work is Command-Option-Shift-Backspace --
>>
>>Actually, the keys to press are:
>>
>> Cmd-Option-X-O
>>
>>That's the letter O, not the number zero.
>
>Wow, it has the complete OS in ROM? I didn't know any of the Mac's did
>that. Are there any others or was this a one shot experiment that failed?
>The OS in ROM is the main thing I like about the Atari ST's.
>
> Zane
>| Zane H. Healy | UNIX Systems Adminstrator |
>| healyzh(a)ix.netcom.com (primary) | Linux Enthusiast |
>| healyzh(a)holonet.net (alternate) | Classic Computer Collector |
>+----------------------------------+----------------------------+
>| Empire of the Petal Throne and Traveller Role Playing, |
>| and Zane's Computer Museum. |
>| http://www.dragonfire.net/~healyzh/ |
Most of what you list are excellent things that are not yet finished.
They WILL catch on when they're done.
Bob was just a dumb program.
I find the touch screen comment unpleasant because I think touch screens
are the key to an easy-to-use interface. Voice recognition and p.p. are
in use and are gaining ground. What were bubbles, and why didn't they
catch on?
Ones you've missed? I think the Amiga caught on a lot less than it
should have, same with the Macintosh.
>BTW, I enjoy collecting over-hyped innovations that never quite
>caught on in the way they were supposed to: Bubbles. Pen-based
>computers. Touch screens. Wireless networks. Bob. MSX. Robots.
>AI. Home automation. The Z8000. The iAPX432. Parallel processing.
> Voice recognition.
>
>What did I miss?
>
>-- Doug
>
>
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
Anybody know what a Tektronix 4211 is? Its got an RS-232C port on the
back, a DB-9 connector, two other db-25 ports, and some other connectors.
Its in a desktop case and is greyish in colour. Saw it in a surplus shop
so I don't have it in front of me to answer
questions.
Sam Alternate e-mail: dastar(a)siconic.com
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ever onward.
September 26 & 27...Vintage Computer Festival 2
See http://www.siconic.com/vcf for details!
[Last web page update: 06/11/98]
>But seriously, while _I'd_ only want to write a book that's correct and
>complete (and therefore does document every last gate in the device), I
>guess few people would ever want to read it.
You could release it in pdf format on the internet with a $5 shareware
fee, or something. I'd certainly buy it, and I'm sure lots of other
people (such as the ones who subscribe to this list) would as well. The
information is invaluable.
Tom Owad
Sysop of Caesarville Online
Client software at: <http://home.earthlink.net/~tomowad/>
A piece of computer memorabilia well worth mounting on the wall or giving as a gift is a stack memory card from the UNIVAC computer. It is the LAST time the home of a bit of information could actually be seen - a tiny doughnut on a grid of wires.
See it at http://www.netw.com/~drfcline/univac.htm