Thanks Chunk. I am going to see if Manchester University library has any
old documentation that might help.
Cheers
Peter
On 17 November 2017 at 18:00, <cctalk-request at classiccmp.org> wrote:
Send cctalk mailing list submissions to
cctalk at
classiccmp.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://www.classiccmp.org/mailman/listinfo/cctalk
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
cctalk-request at
classiccmp.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
cctalk-owner at
classiccmp.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of cctalk digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: Drive capacity names (Was: WTB: HP-85 16k RAM Module and
HPIB Floppy Drive (Geoffrey Reed)
2. Re: Drive capacity names (Was: WTB: HP-85 16k RAM Module and
HPIB Floppy Drive (Chuck Guzis)
3. Re: Drive capacity names (Was: WTB: HP-85 16k RAM Module and
HPIB Floppy Drive (Liam Proven)
4. Re: Drive capacity names (Was: WTB: HP-85 16k RAM Module and
HPIB Floppy Drive (Fred Cisin)
5. TI NaturalLink Disks and Docs (Jason T)
6. Re: HP 9836U processor mystery... (Josh Dersch)
7. Re: Playing with HP2640B (CuriousMarc)
8. Re: Cases (display) for beloved ISA cards? (CuriousMarc)
9. Re: Playing with HP2640B (Christian Corti)
10. Re: Playing with HP2640B (David Collins)
11. Re: Playing with HP2640B (David Collins)
12. Re: Playing with HP2640B (Mattis Lind)
13. RE: Playing with HP2640B (Rik Bos)
14. DR-DOS (Liam Proven)
15. Re: TI NaturalLink Disks and Docs (Jason T)
16. Re: DR-DOS (Liam Proven)
17. Re: DR-DOS (Liam Proven)
18. Re: DR-DOS (william degnan)
19. Re: Cases (display) for beloved ISA cards? (Anders Nelson)
20. Re: DR-DOS (geneb)
21. Re: DR-DOS (Liam Proven)
22. Re: DR-DOS (Liam Proven)
23. Re: DR-DOS (geneb)
24. Re: WTB: HP-85 16k RAM Module and HPIB Floppy Drive
(Eric Schlaepfer)
25. Manchester University Joint System in the 1970s (Peter Allan)
26. Re: WTB: HP-85 16k RAM Module and HPIB Floppy Drive (Paul Berger)
27. Re: Playing with HP2640B (Christian Corti)
28. Re: Manchester University Joint System in the 1970s (Chuck Guzis)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2017 12:30:08 -0800
From: Geoffrey Reed <geoffr at zipcon.net>
To: Fred Cisin <cisin at xenosoft.com>, "General Discussion: On-Topic and
Off-Topic Posts" <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Subject: Re: Drive capacity names (Was: WTB: HP-85 16k RAM Module and
HPIB Floppy Drive
Message-ID: <D63332E6.5367F%geoffr at zipcon.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
On 11/15/17, 9:44 AM, "cctalk on behalf of Fred Cisin via cctalk"
<cctalk-bounces at
classiccmp.org on behalf of cctalk at classiccmp.org> wrote:
Can you name another 20 exceptions? (Chuck and Tony probably can)
--
Grumpy Ol' Fred cisin at
xenosoft.com
?Floptical? disks 720 rpm 1.6 Mb/s transfer 1250 TPI and 25MB unformatted
capacity
LS-120 and LS-240 (which sadly I can?t remember the specs of :(
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2017 12:51:19 -0800
From: Chuck Guzis <cclist at sydex.com>
To: Geoffrey Reed via cctalk <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Subject: Re: Drive capacity names (Was: WTB: HP-85 16k RAM Module and
HPIB Floppy Drive
Message-ID: <a5877e73-9b6c-f5fa-afdf-ef59f1f6caa1 at sydex.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
On 11/16/2017 12:30 PM, Geoffrey Reed via cctalk wrote:
?Floptical? disks 720 rpm 1.6 Mb/s transfer 1250
TPI and 25MB
unformatted
capacity
LS-120 and LS-240 (which sadly I can?t remember the specs of :(
How about the Caleb "it" drive (UHD144):
http://www.obsoletemedia.org/caleb-uhd144/
I've still got a stack of those drives and media.
Or the DTC "TakeTen" drive (got the drive but no media), or the Qume
Hyperflex drive or the Kodak/Drivetec floppy drives or the DTC TeamMate
for Apple...
The list is very long indeed.
--Chuck
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2017 23:28:19 +0100
From: Liam Proven <lproven at gmail.com>
To: Geoffrey Reed <geoffr at zipcon.net>, "General Discussion: On-Topic
and Off-Topic Posts" <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Subject: Re: Drive capacity names (Was: WTB: HP-85 16k RAM Module and
HPIB Floppy Drive
Message-ID:
<CAMTenCE8EoxJxw_W_wBz+53Hfp752Ji2+kw60X8LKxoecvon3A@
mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
On 16 November 2017 at 21:30, Geoffrey Reed via cctalk
<cctalk at classiccmp.org> wrote:
>
?Floptical? disks 720 rpm 1.6 Mb/s transfer 1250
TPI and 25MB
unformatted
capacity
Just FYI, your quote marks render on Linux as superscript 2s.
Using an Apple device? You might want to turn off smart quotes...
https://www.jordanmerrick.com/posts/ios-11-smart-punctuation/
http://appleinsider.com/articles/17/09/26/tips-turn-
off-ios-11-smart-punctuation-to-avoid-data-entry-problems
--
Liam Proven ? Profile:
https://about.me/liamproven
Email: lproven at cix.co.uk ? Google Mail/Talk/Plus: lproven at
gmail.com
Twitter/Facebook/Flickr: lproven ? Skype/LinkedIn/AIM/Yahoo: liamproven
UK: +44 7939-087884 ? ?R/WhatsApp/Telegram/Signal: +420 702 829 053
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2017 15:27:53 -0800 (PST)
From: Fred Cisin <cisin at xenosoft.com>
To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts"
<cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Subject: Re: Drive capacity names (Was: WTB: HP-85 16k RAM Module and
HPIB Floppy Drive
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1711161437490.4440 at shell.lmi.net>
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>> No, the 9122C has two high-density,
two-sided 80 cylinder drives. A
drive
>> has no capacity, this is the function of
the on-disk format.
>> ;-)
>
> "high-density" is even more meaningless than referring to them by their
> capacity in a given format. It is a BOGUS marketing term!
On Thu, 16 Nov 2017, Christian Corti via cctalk wrote:
Fred, you should know by now that you don't
need to tell *me* the correct
definitions and terms.
I know that, but I was addressing the entire group with my rant, and not
everybody is as closely familiar with these details as you are.
And with "high-density", I didn't
mean the media capacity but the analog
recording aspects like coercivity, write current, frequency and so on.
Actually, when speaking about the MEDIA, it is much easier to create a
name that is both accurate and unambiguous.
For example, with 5.25" disks, we have "5.25 inch with 300 Oersted" and
"5.25 inch with 600 Oersted".
Of course, if somebody wants to be difficult, there are still variant
forms, including both 10 and 16 sector hard-sectored, Amlyn 600 Oersted
with special cutouts for the disk changer, Twiggy, no-notch disks for some
minor tamper resistance in software distribution, etc.
Unformatted capacity would be a more correct nomenclature, although ...
Unformatted
capacity doesn't tell you much without reference to the
recording
layout, i.e. no. of tracks, modulation, frequency
and so on.
True.
> Some specifications:
> 5.25" MFM "High Density" was 360 RPM at 500,000 bits per second.
(about
1M
unformatted per side)
What about 5?" FM "High Density" at 360 RPM?
By "Some specifications", I meant specifications of SOME examples of the
most common form of each size. I was absolutely not intending it to be
an exhaustive, comprehensive list of all possibilities.
The Amiga (more exactly, the "HD"
Chinon FZ-357A drives used in Amigas)
switched to 150 RPM to keep the raw bit rate at 250kbits/s.
THAT is exactly what I was including as examples in my later "exceptions"
list. Although a different disk size, that is the same engineering kludge
as the Weltec 5.25" 180RPM drive.
3.5"
MFM "ED" (vertical recording?/barrium ferrite) were 300 RPM at
1,000,000 bits per second. (2M unformatted per side) NeXT referred to
theirs by the unformatted capacity: 4M, further confusing their users.
What about
FM?
Again, just listing examples of most common, NOT intending it as a list of
all possibilities that were theoretically possible. I have never seen an
ED disk recorded FM, and do not believe that there was ever a commercial
system that used that. If you know of one, please give us the details!
Can you
name another 20 exceptions? (Chuck and Tony probably can)
Do you want me to start with things like 100tpi drives, GCR, M?FM,
hard-sectored and other crazy formats?
It can be a very long list. I was trying to stick with ones that were
very close to the main branch of our "current" evolutionary tree, but
there isn't a clear boundary. I estimate that there were approximately
2500 different microcomputer floppy disk formats, with a large portion of
those being variant forms, not just different choices of number and size
of sectors, directory location and structure, etc.
I implemented just over 400 formats in XenoCopy that were straight-forward
to handle with IBM PC hardware. Those are not all that could have been
implemented, nor does it deny the existence of many variants, or
completely different ones that are not feasable with PC.
Just accept that I am not as dumb as you may
think.
I have NEVER thought that you were dumb. Everything that I have seen
of your posts has been competent and well-informed. But, I don't think
that you follow what I was attempting to convey.
I wanted to:
1) rant about marketing creating terminology, including "double density"
and "high density". And creating a new definition of Megabyte (1,024,000)
for the "1.44M" format (1,474,560 bytes/1.40625Mebibytes)
2) state my opinion that using the specific one that comprises at least
75%? of the use of a given configuration as the name for that
configuration creates a name that is admittedly inaccurate, and fraught
with exceptions, nevertheless relatively unambiguous, at least to the
extent that purchases will usually be usable.
If I buy "360K diskette", it will usually be the 300 Oersted 5.25 inch,
and be the closest of what is available to buy for 87.5K TRS80,
Apple2, PET, Osborne, PC 160K/180K/320K/360K, DEC Rainbow, Canon AS100,
Elcompco, Eagle, Otrona, etc.
Yes, there were people who used 41 or 42 tracks of a 40 track drive, but I
consider those to be "corner cases", to be considered as alterations, not
as the main form.
Admittedly, there were differences in testing between SSSD, DSSD, DSSD,
DSDD, and 48tpi v 96tpi marketing of disks with the same chmical
formulation. Purchasing diskettes now for something such as a DEC
Rainbow, I would settle for the 360K testing.
If I buy "720K 3.5 inch diskette", I expect to receive 600 Oersted 3.5"
If I buy "1.44M Diskette", I expect to receive a "HD" 3.5 inch
diskette,
with about 720 to 780 Oersted.
BUT, as you've pointed out, when we refer to the DRIVE, we can't really be
certain that it won't be misinterpreted unless we list every spec that we
expect it to conform to. Or order by manufacturers model number.
Shugart/Matsushita 455/465/475
Tandon TM100-2/TM100-4
Teac 55B, 55F, 55G, 55FG, etc.
(EXAMPLES. NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS A "complete" LIST)
BTW, Tandon made a 100tpi drive (TM100-4M) for Micropolis compatability,
but many/most? of those are mislabelled "TM100-4" (missing that critical
'M' modifier!)
--
Grumpy Ol' Fred cisin at
xenosoft.com
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2017 21:16:08 -0600
From: Jason T <silent700 at gmail.com>
To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts"
<cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Subject: TI NaturalLink Disks and Docs
Message-ID:
<CAEfH1SGBOxKUXW3rQmNGaLxsnVDZ3=D-Pe-+A9NTLRFtjJ+itg at mail.
gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
I have imaged disks and scanned docs for an old software authoring
tool from Texas Instruments, "NaturalLink". It runs on early IBM PCs
and was included with some docs I was given for the TI Professional
Computer, an almost-PC clone. There are a number of ads and articles
about NaturalLink in the various trade mags available via Google
Books.
The docs are here:
http://chiclassiccomp.org/docs/index.php?dir=%2Fcomputing%2FTI/NaturalLink
And the disk images are here:
http://nocarrier.net/archive/floppy_images/PC/TI/NaturalLink/
Regular 360k MS-DOS images. I haven't tried them in DOSBox yet but
it'll probably run there.
I have the original manuals, along with some other Professional
Computer manuals that were already on Bitsavers, free for shipping if
anyone wants them. They're not light. I can include the NaturalLink
disks as well, otherwise those will stay in my library. Unfortunately
I don't have any of the (special format) OS media for the
Professional.
Enjoy!
-j
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2017 20:11:57 -0800
From: Josh Dersch <derschjo at gmail.com>
Cc: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts"
<cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Subject: Re: HP 9836U processor mystery...
Message-ID:
<CADBZjLZ9AeUWiQhuo_-F+xZjPA=p9De=MDG3n+km0tRWWyTAfQ at mail.
gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 8:59 PM, Tony Duell <ard.p850ug1 at gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 4:52 AM, Josh Dersch via
cctalk
<cctalk at classiccmp.org> wrote:
I'm curious if other people out there with
9836U's can confirm whether
their
machine has a 68000 or a 68010 in it, I'd
just like to settle the
internet
discrepancy once and for all :).
Mine identifies the CPU as a 68010 in the power-on diagnostic. But from
what
I remember the PGA socket could also take a 68012 (with extra address
pins
brought out). I don't have such a chip, so no
idea what it would identify
as.
I picked up a 68012 (cheap) and stuck in in the 9836U this evening. It
works, and is identified as a 68012 during power-up diagnostics.
So now we know. Now what am I gonna do with all that address space? :)
- Josh
-tony
------------------------------
Message: 7
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2017 23:12:54 -0800
From: CuriousMarc <curiousmarc3 at gmail.com>
To: Mattis Lind <mattislind at gmail.com>, "General Discussion: On-Topic
and Off-Topic Posts" <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Subject: Re: Playing with HP2640B
Message-ID: <C27C94AA-8CEB-4330-9D51-760B18A13CB1 at gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
What did you do for the screen mold? Hot wire method to separate CRT from
implosion window? Put the CRT in a hot water bath? Chip at the glue?
Marc
On Nov 15, 2017, at 11:48 AM, Mattis Lind via cctalk <
cctalk at classiccmp.org> wrote:
I have been working on a HP 2640B terminal. It was mostly about fixing the
"screen mold" problem and cleaning up the liquids that had been seeping out
from the screen down into the bottom.
The small coaxial wire that connects the 4.9152 MHz clock signal form the
power supply (never seen a crystal controlled SMPSU before!) to the
backplane was broken off, but after fixing that the terminal worked fine.
Just needed some adjustment to the brightness.
With the correct terminfo installed it worked quite well as a serial
terminal to a Linux box.
Then I tried the short 8008 programs that Christian Corti pointed to
http://computermuseum.informatik.uni-stuttgart.de/dev_en/hp2644/diag.html
and
ftp://computermuseum.informatik.uni-stuttgart.de/hp/hp2644
I tried both a couple of times. The terminal enter the LOADER mode but just
hangs completely at the end. I tried different baudrates but no difference.
The selftest STATUS line tell me 40<802 which should indicate that there
are 4k memory in the terminal. However there should be 5k since there is
one 4k board and one combined control store and 1 k RAM board. Maybe there
is a fault in the 1k SRAM? The terminal doesn't complain though.
Regardless, the programs listed either starts at adress 30000 or 36000
which should then be within the available space.
The question is, should these program work for the HP2640B as well? It has
a 8008 but my guess is that the firmware is different from the 2644. What
is the joint experience regarding this? Has anyone ran these small programs
above on a HP2640B?
The HP 2640B firmware consists of four EA 4900 ROM chips which annoyingly
are not anything like normal EPROMs. So dumping will need special
considerations.
Has anyone dumped the HP 2640B firmware already? I didn't find it on
bitsavers.
/Mattis
------------------------------
Message: 8
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2017 23:25:43 -0800
From: CuriousMarc <curiousmarc3 at gmail.com>
To: Ethan via cctalk <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Subject: Re: Cases (display) for beloved ISA cards?
Message-ID: <DCE4C2E5-58CF-4CEF-87F0-B0B11833D622 at gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
I use shadow boxes from Michael's to display my boards. They have many
kinds
http://www.michaels.com/-black-shadowbox-studio-decor/
M10322044.html?dwvar_M10322044_color=Black
Marc
On Nov 16, 2017, at 8:04 AM, Ethan via cctalk <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
wrote:
This message has no content.
------------------------------
Message: 9
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2017 10:09:58 +0100 (CET)
From: Christian Corti <cc at informatik.uni-stuttgart.de>
To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts"
<cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Subject: Re: Playing with HP2640B
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1711170954380.25118 at linuxserv.home>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
On Thu, 16 Nov 2017, CuriousMarc wrote:
What did you do for the screen mold? Hot wire
method to separate CRT
from implosion window? Put the CRT in a hot water bath? Chip at the
glue? Marc
What we did on one of our 2645 terminals was the hot wire method. We then
attached the "implosion" window to the inner of the case.
BTW is it really an implosion protection? I don't think so because since
the 60s, practically all CRTs have a so-called "integral implosion
protection" (thick glass on the front and metal band around the edge). I
think it is just an anti-glare filter glass. OTOH American CRTs may be
completely different in this aspect compared to European ones.
Christian
------------------------------
Message: 10
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2017 20:10:25 +1100
From: David Collins <davidkcollins2 at gmail.com>
To: CuriousMarc <curiousmarc3 at gmail.com>, "General Discussion:
On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts" <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Subject: Re: Playing with HP2640B
Message-ID: <45A317C7-55D2-49BC-892D-460322C6EDB8 at gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Marc, in addition to Mattis? forthcoming reply, my recent experience with
a moldy 2624A was that the hot wire method was very poor. Too hard to get
the wire in, didn?t melt the ?glue? very well, smelly. Gave up when the
wire broke.
What worked best for me was a flat blade screwdriver that was small enough
to sit sideways in the gap between the front glass and the tube. I sliced
sections of the glue and picked them out with a hook. I also squirted in a
combination of RP7 and household cleaner but not sure either did anything
other than lubricate the surfaces - they may have helped lift the glue a
bit.
My ?glue? was like a layer of silicon rubber which hung on for as long as
possible but I got it all off without any damage.
I replaced the front glass and held it on with a bead of black silicon
rubber used for shower glass. I spaced it from the tube with pieces of wire
around the edges and pulled them out when the silicon dried.
Worked well for me but keen to hear how Mattis went.
I didn?t try the hot water soak but it would probably help.
David Collins
On 17 Nov 2017, at 6:12 pm, CuriousMarc via
cctalk <
cctalk at classiccmp.org> wrote:
What did you do for the screen mold? Hot wire method to separate CRT
from
implosion window? Put the CRT in a hot water bath? Chip at the glue?
Marc
On Nov 15, 2017, at 11:48 AM, Mattis Lind via cctalk <
cctalk at
classiccmp.org> wrote:
I have been working on a HP 2640B terminal. It was mostly about fixing
the
"screen mold" problem and cleaning up
the liquids that had been seeping
out
from the screen down into the bottom.
The small coaxial wire that connects the 4.9152 MHz clock signal form the
power supply (never seen a crystal controlled SMPSU before!) to the
backplane was broken off, but after fixing that the terminal worked fine.
Just needed some adjustment to the brightness.
With the correct terminfo installed it worked quite well as a serial
terminal to a Linux box.
Then I tried the short 8008 programs that Christian Corti pointed to
http://computermuseum.informatik.uni-stuttgart.de/ dev_en/hp2644/diag.html
and
ftp://computermuseum.informatik.uni-stuttgart.de/hp/hp2644
I tried both a couple of times. The terminal enter the LOADER mode but
just
hangs completely at the end. I tried different
baudrates but no
difference.
The selftest STATUS line tell me 40<802 which should indicate that there
are 4k memory in the terminal. However there should be 5k since there is
one 4k board and one combined control store and 1 k RAM board. Maybe
there
is a fault in the 1k SRAM? The terminal
doesn't complain though.
Regardless, the programs listed either starts at adress 30000 or 36000
which should then be within the available space.
The question is, should these program work for the HP2640B as well? It
has
a 8008 but my guess is that the firmware is
different from the 2644. What
is the joint experience regarding this? Has anyone ran these small
programs
above on a HP2640B?
The HP 2640B firmware consists of four EA 4900 ROM chips which annoyingly
are not anything like normal EPROMs. So dumping will need special
considerations.
Has anyone dumped the HP 2640B firmware already? I didn't find it on
bitsavers.
/Mattis
------------------------------
Message: 11
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2017 20:13:00 +1100
From: David Collins <davidkcollins2 at gmail.com>
To: Christian Corti <cc at informatik.uni-stuttgart.de>, "General
Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts" <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Subject: Re: Playing with HP2640B
Message-ID: <555C99B3-D2B1-4D83-97E7-025672F96790 at gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Christian do you know the gauge of the wire you used ? And the current?
Maybe I should try that approach again!
David Collins
On 17 Nov 2017, at 8:09 pm, Christian Corti via
cctalk <
cctalk at classiccmp.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Nov 2017, CuriousMarc wrote:
> What did you do for the screen mold? Hot wire method to separate CRT
from
implosion window? Put the CRT in a hot water bath? Chip at the glue?
Marc
What we did on one of our 2645 terminals was the hot wire method. We
then attached
the "implosion" window to the inner of the case.
BTW is it really an implosion protection? I don't think so because since
the
60s, practically all CRTs have a so-called "integral implosion
protection" (thick glass on the front and metal band around the edge). I
think it is just an anti-glare filter glass. OTOH American CRTs may be
completely different in this aspect compared to European ones.
Christian
------------------------------
Message: 12
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2017 11:52:47 +0100
From: Mattis Lind <mattislind at gmail.com>
To: David Collins <davidkcollins2 at gmail.com>, "General Discussion:
On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts" <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Subject: Re: Playing with HP2640B
Message-ID:
<CABr82SJ6oWNN7Ga6LJ=5LYfoZj3EYStYDrFatZGBXBhoSCp5Gw at mail.
gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
The screen on my HP2640 had degenerated quite far. It was only a spot in
the middle, 2 by 4 inch, that still attached the glass to the CRT. I used a
thin fish fillet knife to dig through the remaining glue.
Before
https://scontent-arn2-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/23622163_10155696765784985_
6518064439030378363_n.jpg?oh=44cbf7f7f00d6e25155c208124e20a38&oe=5AA7349D
The result after:
https://scontent-arn2-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/23621971_10155696757184985_
1959733265676657917_n.jpg?oh=36a20689c0fb5a16de7fc4df138a40e0&oe=5A9993B1
Anyhow, I researched the glue a bit. The glue is, as far as I understand,
PVAc (PolyVinylAcetate, sometimes also known as PVA). PVAc is not soluble
in water. It takes quite high temperature to melt it. However PVAc is
soluble in many esters. I bought some Butylacetate. It dissolves sample
bits of glue from HP2640 quite well and rapidly. Butylacetate has quite
high boiling temperature (about 120 degrees centigrade) and thus does not
evaporate that quickly. So my idea is now to test on a 2645 screen or VR201
screen by adding some butylacetate and seal with some thin plastic wrap
foil and let it dissolve a bit. Then use the fish fillet knife again and
repeat the process.
/Mattis
------------------------------
Message: 13
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2017 13:12:29 +0100
From: "Rik Bos" <hp-fix at xs4all.nl>
To: "'Mattis Lind'" <mattislind at gmail.com>, "'General
Discussion:
On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts'" <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Subject: RE: Playing with HP2640B
Message-ID: <004401d35f9d$57dcf900$0796eb00$(a)xs4all.nl>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
I did it by heating the crt to about 50-60 degrees celsius and used a
putty-knife.
https://www.flickr.com/photos/hp-fix/albums/72157689357633754
The photos are from a Philips P2000M system but I did it the same way with
my 264X terminals and 9845's systems.
It takes about half an hour to heat and separate the screen from the crt .
-Rik
The screen on my HP2640 had degenerated quite
far. It was only a spot in
the
middle, 2 by 4 inch, that still attached the
glass to the CRT. I used a
thin fish fillet
knife to dig through the remaining glue.
Before
https://scontent-arn2-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-
9/23622163_10155696765784985_6518064439030378363_n.jpg?oh=44cbf7f7f
00d6e25155c208124e20a38&oe=5AA7349D
The result after:
https://scontent-arn2-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-
9/23621971_10155696757184985_1959733265676657917_n.jpg?oh=36a20689
c0fb5a16de7fc4df138a40e0&oe=5A9993B1
Anyhow, I researched the glue a bit. The glue is, as far as I
understand, PVAc
(PolyVinylAcetate, sometimes also known as PVA).
PVAc is not soluble in
water.
It takes quite high temperature to melt it.
However PVAc is soluble in
many
esters. I bought some Butylacetate. It dissolves
sample bits of glue
from HP2640
quite well and rapidly. Butylacetate has quite
high boiling temperature
(about
120 degrees centigrade) and thus does not
evaporate that quickly. So my
idea is
now to test on a 2645 screen or VR201 screen by
adding some butylacetate
and
seal with some thin plastic wrap foil and let it
dissolve a bit. Then
use the fish
fillet knife again and repeat the process.
/Mattis
------------------------------
Message: 14
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2017 14:30:20 +0100
From: Liam Proven <lproven at gmail.com>
To: "Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts" <cctalk at
classiccmp.org>
Subject: DR-DOS
Message-ID:
<CAMTenCEZycvAXZbfE8Zcz-_CE6Z70D5OTdGLMkHuDpBGJvZutQ@
mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
I hope this is vintage enough.
I've been playing around some more with my projects to create VMs /
bootable USB keys with PC DOS 7.1 and DR-DOS.
Right now I'm focusing on DR-DOS 7.1 and the DR OpenDOS Enhancement
Project, because that's FOSS and AFAICS it can be redistributed, which
I can't with DR-DOS 7.02/7.03/7.04/7.05 or DR-DOS 8/8.1, which were
commercially licensed.
I found a download of the last build released:
https://archiveos.org/drdos/
First, it's the wrong size. VirtualBox can't mount it. VMware can.
I truncated it to exactly 2880 sectors using the advice from ``jleg094''
here:
https://forums.virtualbox.org/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=39141
VBox mounts that. But it won't boot, nor in VMware -- it just
displays 2 dots and freezes.
Embarrassingly late in the troubleshooting process, I've found why.
I didn't think to check what was on the image! Foolish of me.
I mounted it on a pre-booted VM and looked, and it's blank! There's
nothing in the image at all.
So, I mounted the empty image file as a loop device, copied the boot
files in there and then the rest of the files in the distro archive.
And lo, it works! It boots my VM just fine, and it's now running 7.01-08.
All I need to do now is work out how to make the hard disk bootable,
and I'm in business.
The DR-DOS 7 SYS command won't do it, as the files aren't named
IBMBIOS.COM and
IBMSYS.COM -- they're DRBIO.SYS and DRSYS.SYS.
I copied them to the expected names. SYS completes but the disk won't boot.
Next step will be to try with Norton Disk Doctor.
Anyway, if anyone wants a bootable diskette image with DR-DOS 7.01-08,
complete with FAT32 support -- apparently it can even boot from it --
let me know.
--
Liam Proven ? Profile:
https://about.me/liamproven
Email: lproven at cix.co.uk ? Google Mail/Talk/Plus: lproven at
gmail.com
Twitter/Facebook/Flickr: lproven ? Skype/LinkedIn/AIM/Yahoo: liamproven
UK: +44 7939-087884 ? ?R/WhatsApp/Telegram/Signal: +420 702 829 053
------------------------------
Message: 15
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2017 08:28:21 -0600
From: Jason T <silent700 at gmail.com>
To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts"
<cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Subject: Re: TI NaturalLink Disks and Docs
Message-ID:
<CAEfH1SFfc8ne599yLNgS2NJ4pS3TF_mba0CxZpMXuFXbyx2fEg at mail.
gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
On Nov 16, 2017 21:16, "Jason T" <silent700 at gmail.com> wrote:
I have the original manuals, along with some other Professional
Computer manuals that were already on Bitsavers, free for shipping if
anyone wants them. They're not light.
Oops, forgot to mention location. I'm in the USA, near Chicago.
------------------------------
Message: 16
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2017 16:10:21 +0100
From: Liam Proven <lproven at gmail.com>
To: "Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts" <cctalk at
classiccmp.org>
Subject: Re: DR-DOS
Message-ID:
<CAMTenCFFB4RK7vJGqR=mupppQpwHPiMbuehL-BX_XYG5tJfOeg at mail.
gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Might be more helpful to include downloads!
I'm still working on VMs, but I know have bootable diskette images of
both. To the best of my knowledge, this is the first time either has
been made available.
DR-DOS 7.08 is here:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/cz8nrdv7h4sgr6o/drdep7018.zip?dl=0
You'll need the rest of DR-DOS 7.01 to install a complete OS but
that's widely available.
A bootable PC DOS 7.1 diskette image is here:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/zsujtvp0gs44qcx/PCDOS71.vfd?dl=0
This is a VirtualBox disk image, containing the PC-DOS 7.1 files from
the IBM ServerGuide Scripting Toolkit, as made available by IBM and
described here:
http://toogam.com/software/archive/opsys/dos/ibmpcdos/getpcd71.htm
If you get that first, AIUI that gives you a licence to a personal-use
copy. I have not modified these files in any way except to combine the
separately-downloadable files and the boot disk image, and to remove
any non-PC DOS files from the disk image.
Again, the rest of the OS must be taken from a copy of PC DOS 7.01.
That too is widely available.
Feedback welcomed.
--
Liam Proven ? Profile:
https://about.me/liamproven
Email: lproven at cix.co.uk ? Google Mail/Talk/Plus: lproven at
gmail.com
Twitter/Facebook/Flickr: lproven ? Skype/LinkedIn/AIM/Yahoo: liamproven
UK: +44 7939-087884 ? ?R/WhatsApp/Telegram/Signal: +420 702 829 053
------------------------------
Message: 17
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2017 16:12:08 +0100
From: Liam Proven <lproven at gmail.com>
To: "Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts" <cctalk at
classiccmp.org>
Subject: Re: DR-DOS
Message-ID:
<CAMTenCH-N2WVbDffCsAdHixyMrm+cw1WBB=OqVoiR3WL7F=yJw at mail.
gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
It is *not* my day. I don't know how a copy-and-paste of some plain
text magically acquired attachments; that was not intentional. My
apologies.
--
Liam Proven ? Profile:
https://about.me/liamproven
Email: lproven at cix.co.uk ? Google Mail/Talk/Plus: lproven at
gmail.com
Twitter/Facebook/Flickr: lproven ? Skype/LinkedIn/AIM/Yahoo: liamproven
UK: +44 7939-087884 ? ?R/WhatsApp/Telegram/Signal: +420 702 829 053
------------------------------
Message: 18
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2017 10:12:55 -0500
From: william degnan <billdegnan at gmail.com>
To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts"
<cctalk at classiccmp.org>, Liam Proven <lproven at gmail.com>
Subject: Re: DR-DOS
Message-ID:
<CABGJBueQSQ2q_9P5qaX=iX_nuA0+8YCXfWY1hUc=qGwJzGs2Yg at mail.
gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
I have a few original Dr dos disks. Versions 5, 6, 7. Would these help if
I am imaged and uploaded to my site?
Bill Degnan
twitter: billdeg
vintagecomputer.net
On Nov 17, 2017 10:10 AM, "Liam Proven via cctalk" <cctalk at
classiccmp.org>
wrote:
Might be more helpful to include downloads!
I'm still working on VMs, but I know have bootable diskette images of
both. To the best of my knowledge, this is the first time either has
been made available.
DR-DOS 7.08 is here:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/cz8nrdv7h4sgr6o/drdep7018.zip?dl=0
You'll need the rest of DR-DOS 7.01 to install a complete OS but
that's widely available.
A bootable PC DOS 7.1 diskette image is here:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/zsujtvp0gs44qcx/PCDOS71.vfd?dl=0
This is a VirtualBox disk image, containing the PC-DOS 7.1 files from
the IBM ServerGuide Scripting Toolkit, as made available by IBM and
described here:
http://toogam.com/software/archive/opsys/dos/ibmpcdos/getpcd71.htm
If you get that first, AIUI that gives you a licence to a personal-use
copy. I have not modified these files in any way except to combine the
separately-downloadable files and the boot disk image, and to remove
any non-PC DOS files from the disk image.
Again, the rest of the OS must be taken from a copy of PC DOS 7.01.
That too is widely available.
Feedback welcomed.
--
Liam Proven ? Profile:
https://about.me/liamproven
Email: lproven at cix.co.uk ? Google Mail/Talk/Plus: lproven at
gmail.com
Twitter/Facebook/Flickr: lproven ? Skype/LinkedIn/AIM/Yahoo: liamproven
UK: +44 7939-087884 ? ?R/WhatsApp/Telegram/Signal: +420 702 829 053
------------------------------
Message: 19
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2017 10:35:13 -0500
From: Anders Nelson <anders.k.nelson at gmail.com>
To: CuriousMarc <curiousmarc3 at gmail.com>, "General Discussion:
On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts" <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Subject: Re: Cases (display) for beloved ISA cards?
Message-ID:
<CAJ2mpAg1Vwn1+cKZ2znQqu7U97k1kwViyc3L+Bj+
KnTcEJa6pg at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
I mounted a core memory plane in a shadowbox from Target and used a large
paperclip cut into sections as the mount hardware. Folded over and
hot-glued one end to the read of the shadowbox backing, placed the memory
plane at the desired height and folded over the other end of the paperclip
section. I also put a piece of heatshrink tubing on the paperclip end that
contacted the memory plane soas not to scratch it.
Pictures:
https://photos.app.goo.gl/dzSX21lOC34MaJxm2
=]
--
Anders Nelson
+1 (517) 775-6129
www.erogear.com
On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 2:25 AM, CuriousMarc via cctalk <
cctalk at classiccmp.org> wrote:
I use shadow boxes from Michael's to display
my boards. They have many
kinds
http://www.michaels.com/-black-shadowbox-studio-decor/
M10322044.html?dwvar_M10322044_color=Black
Marc
On Nov 16, 2017, at 8:04 AM, Ethan via cctalk <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
wrote:
This message has no content.
------------------------------
Message: 20
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2017 07:44:16 -0800 (PST)
From: geneb <geneb at deltasoft.com>
To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts"
<cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Subject: Re: DR-DOS
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.03.1711170743080.30810 at deltasoft.com>
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
On Fri, 17 Nov 2017, william degnan via cctalk wrote:
I have a few original Dr dos disks. Versions 5,
6, 7. Would these help
if
I am imaged and uploaded to my site?
Liam, if you need me to I can build a full distro of OpenDOS 7 - I've got
a machine that I can build the original sources on.
g.
--
Proud owner of F-15C 80-0007
http://www.f15sim.com - The only one of its kind.
http://www.diy-cockpits.org/coll - Go Collimated or Go Home.
Some people collect things for a hobby. Geeks collect hobbies.
ScarletDME - The red hot Data Management Environment
A Multi-Value database for the masses, not the classes.
http://scarlet.deltasoft.com - Get it _today_!
------------------------------
Message: 21
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2017 16:52:08 +0100
From: Liam Proven <lproven at gmail.com>
To: william degnan <billdegnan at gmail.com>
Cc: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts"
<cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Subject: Re: DR-DOS
Message-ID:
<CAMTenCEnjvFRMv6899eBOZBVcmCSkYQA0K9gcF+Ae0BDLTNnMw at mail.
gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
On 17 November 2017 at 16:12, william degnan <billdegnan at gmail.com> wrote:
I have a few original Dr dos disks. Versions 5,
6, 7. Would these help
if
I am imaged and uploaded to my site?
What I'd suggest is checking what's there first. :-)
I have DR-DOS 6, from VetusWare. There's a copy on WinWorld but it's
some homemade disks, lacking an installer, IIRC.
I have physical media from the early 1990s somewhere!
I have DR-DOS 7.01/02/03/04/05/8.0/8.1 mostly from WinWorld .
I own an original open source release of 7.01, including sources,
direct from Caldera, on CD. This is from before they changed their
mind and back-pedalled.
I have a full boxed copy of PC DOS 7. It was distributed with
Microsoft Virtual PC, which itself is a free download now. So the VM
is out there and freely available.
My VM is built from the free download version, with ViewMax taken from
the download of DR DOS 6.
I have a working VM of PC DOS 7.1 but I'm still working on that. I
don't currently have a bootable USB of it -- making new bootable
volumes is non-trivial. It's not as simple as SYS or FORMAT /S, alas.
Neither works. I don't think it was meant to, TBH. Ditto the later OEM
releases of DR DOS 7.04/05 -- these were only on Disk Manager and
PartitionMagic boot disks, AFAIK. The whole OS was not updated.
--
Liam Proven ? Profile:
https://about.me/liamproven
Email: lproven at cix.co.uk ? Google Mail/Talk/Plus: lproven at
gmail.com
Twitter/Facebook/Flickr: lproven ? Skype/LinkedIn/AIM/Yahoo: liamproven
UK: +44 7939-087884 ? ?R/WhatsApp/Telegram/Signal: +420 702 829 053
------------------------------
Message: 22
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2017 17:03:25 +0100
From: Liam Proven <lproven at gmail.com>
To: geneb <geneb at deltasoft.com>, "General Discussion: On-Topic and
Off-Topic Posts" <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Subject: Re: DR-DOS
Message-ID:
<CAMTenCFo9R+EHj9PxF-9xgFikXZQ1MdAyVaT37diA7GEmzT9M
w at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
On 17 November 2017 at 16:44, geneb via cctalk <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
wrote:
Liam, if you need me to I can build a full distro of OpenDOS 7 - I've
got a
machine that I can build the original sources on.
Thanks!
For now, I'm trying to avoid building anything. I believe that the
build process is horribly complex -- I can find the link to a
description of the horrors somewhere. Something like 9 different
compilers are apparently used.
So I hope not to need that, but appreciate the offer!
What I am planning to do is combine the released boot files for PC-DOS
7.1 and DR-DOS 7.01-8, both with FAT32 and LBA support, with the rest
of the released OSes of both, to make something as complete as
possible.
My plan is then to add on top of that a graphical shell -- DOSSHELL
for PC DOS, ViewMax for DR DOS.
And then add some useful shareware/freeware utilities and apps, to
make a complete useful working environment, for example able to boot
off a USB stick for a distraction-free, non-Internet-capable, writing
tool. There seems to be considerable interest in such things these
days, and of course, the problem with apps that provide
distraction-free clean-screen writing/editing environments is that you
can always just switch apps to something else.
I have DESQview and DESQview/X running in a VM, but not on bare metal.
QEMM seems to have problems on 21st century PC hardware, which is
perhaps unsurprising.
On one of my own Lenovo notebooks, I have a bootable partition with PC
DOS 7.01, MS Word 6, WordPerfect 6.2, Norton Utilities and some other
tools. With power management, but not networking or anything. This
works for me, but they can't be distributed; they're licensed tools.
MS Word 5.5 is a free download, though. I was planning to add tools
such as PC Write, PC Outline, As-Easy-As, WordPerfect Editor, a Norton
Commander clone -- stuff that _is_ distributable.
I also need to add a current DOS antivirus, unfortunately. I think
there still are some.
The theory is to produce something functionally rich that runs in a VM
-- because then I know the hardware environment and can configure
things for it. And something much less functionally-rich that can boot
and run off a USB stick on almost any hardware.
DR-DOS should be re-distributable. PC DOS, I fear not, at least not
fully legitimately. But my download diskette image contains nothing
that IBM itself currently does not offer for free unrestricted
download. I'm hoping that the company will tolerate that, at least.
--
Liam Proven ? Profile:
https://about.me/liamproven
Email: lproven at cix.co.uk ? Google Mail/Talk/Plus: lproven at
gmail.com
Twitter/Facebook/Flickr: lproven ? Skype/LinkedIn/AIM/Yahoo: liamproven
UK: +44 7939-087884 ? ?R/WhatsApp/Telegram/Signal: +420 702 829 053
------------------------------
Message: 23
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2017 08:20:06 -0800 (PST)
From: geneb <geneb at deltasoft.com>
To: cctalk at
classiccmp.org
Subject: Re: DR-DOS
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.03.1711170817380.32638 at deltasoft.com>
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
On Fri, 17 Nov 2017, Liam Proven wrote:
On 17 November 2017 at 16:44, geneb via cctalk
<cctalk at classiccmp.org>
wrote:
>
> Liam, if you need me to I can build a full distro of OpenDOS 7 - I've
got
a
machine
that I can build the original sources on.
Thanks!
For now, I'm trying to avoid building anything. I believe that the
build process is horribly complex -- I can find the link to a
description of the horrors somewhere. Something like 9 different
compilers are apparently used.
If you've got the same MRS disc that Roger sent me, you've got the whole
build environment already. You can kick it off with a single command.
The only caveat is that you need to boot into OpenDOS/DR-DOS in order to
get enough free lower RAM to run the build process.
g.
--
Proud owner of F-15C 80-0007
http://www.f15sim.com - The only one of its kind.
http://www.diy-cockpits.org/coll - Go Collimated or Go Home.
Some people collect things for a hobby. Geeks collect hobbies.
ScarletDME - The red hot Data Management Environment
A Multi-Value database for the masses, not the classes.
http://scarlet.deltasoft.com - Get it _today_!
------------------------------
Message: 24
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2017 09:04:07 -0800
From: Eric Schlaepfer <schlae at gmail.com>
To: Eric Smith <spacewar at gmail.com>
Cc: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts"
<cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Subject: Re: WTB: HP-85 16k RAM Module and HPIB Floppy Drive
Message-ID:
<CAJEzEZGKGL0Yh8LuLnAVEBQmXWbY_3MjwFN6hx42bEDGvQNc5Q at mail.
gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Check your email. How can you tell if it uses a 600 RPM mechanism or not?
On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 3:17 AM, Eric Smith <spacewar at gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Eric,
It's not urgent, but when you have a chance, could you dump the 9122C
ROM(s) and take high resolution photos of the controller board?
Since it does HD, I suspect it probably does not use a 600 RPM mechanism.
Thanks!
Best regards,
Eric
On Nov 15, 2017 17:45, "Eric Schlaepfer via cctalk" <
cctalk at
classiccmp.org>
wrote:
> It'd be interesting to find out how well that PRM-85 works. I've laid
out
> a
> board for a rough equivalent but I haven't fabbed it out. It may be
> cheaper
> for me to buy that instead.
>
> I've also got a 9122C but I don't have the mass storage ROM so I can't
use
> it with my 85. Right now I'm using it
with my 9000 series 300.
>
> On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 8:26 PM, Mark J. Blair via cctalk <
> cctalk at classiccmp.org> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > > On Nov 14, 2017, at 20:11, Ed Sharpe via cctalk <
> cctalk at classiccmp.org>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > wondervifcthec9122 drives,will work on 85?
> > >
> >
> > I think I can guess what you meant to say there... :)
> >
> > I?ve ordered a PRM-85 (a modern reprogrammable ROM drawer replacement)
> > which includes the HP-85B version of the Mass Storage ROM, and the
> Extended
> > Mass Storage ROM. Based on what I have read, I think that should let
my
> A
> > model use the newer 9122C drive, and other drives using either the
> Amigo or
> > SS-80 protocols.
> >
> > I?d like to get the 9122C mostly because I have a much easier time
> finding
> > 1.44M media than the older double density media. eBay and I don?t
talk,
> so
> > that limits my options a bit. If I had easy access to lots of 3.5? DD
> > media, then I would consider getting one of the more plentiful (?)
other
------------------------------
Message: 25
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2017 17:24:00 +0000
From: Peter Allan <petermallan at gmail.com>
To: cctalk at
classiccmp.org
Subject: Manchester University Joint System in the 1970s
Message-ID:
<CAJCrz550ajCzQuMz-t+zMF34Dk3YwtvwPCGU0Om9swUg-
MkXhQ at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
I was a student at Manchester University from 1974 to 1980. During that
time I used the University of Manchester Regional Computer Centre (UMRCC)
computer system. The so-called Joint System consisted of a CDC 7600 with an
ICL 1906A front end. We used to submit card decks via a Systime (a PDP-11
clone, I believe) that functioned as a remote job entry service.
I am trying to find out information about the structure of those card decks
(mine were used for shopping lists years ago), and in particular, what the
first card in the deck was that routed the job to the correct computer.
I have found information about JOB cards for both ICL computers running
George 3 and for the CDC 7600 running SCOPE 2.1 (which is what the
computers ran), but I believe that neither of these gives the full story
about what we used on the Joint System.
Does anyone who used this system, or similar ones in the UK, recall
anything relevant?
If you have suggestions about where else to post this query, I would be
grateful for that too.
Cheers
Peter Allan
------------------------------
Message: 26
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2017 13:26:05 -0400
From: Paul Berger <phb.hfx at gmail.com>
To: Eric Schlaepfer via cctalk <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Subject: Re: WTB: HP-85 16k RAM Module and HPIB Floppy Drive
Message-ID: <71be6676-c829-33e3-4e48-b3ca4eedcefc at gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
I just checked my 9122C I happen to have open and the interval between
index pulses is 199.66mS? which would be 300 RPM, which is good news for
me I can now proceed with adapting a more common 1.44 drive to replace
my broken one.
Paul.
On 2017-11-17 1:04 PM, Eric Schlaepfer via cctalk wrote:
Check your email. How can you tell if it uses a
600 RPM mechanism or not?
On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 3:17 AM, Eric Smith <spacewar at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Eric,
>
> It's not urgent, but when you have a chance, could you dump the 9122C
> ROM(s) and take high resolution photos of the controller board?
>
> Since it does HD, I suspect it probably does not use a 600 RPM
mechanism.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Best regards,
> Eric
>
>
> On Nov 15, 2017 17:45, "Eric Schlaepfer via cctalk" <
cctalk at
classiccmp.org>
> wrote:
>
>> It'd be interesting to find out how well that PRM-85 works. I've laid
out
>> a
>> board for a rough equivalent but I haven't fabbed it out. It may be
>> cheaper
>> for me to buy that instead.
>>
>> I've also got a 9122C but I don't have the mass storage ROM so I
can't
use
>> it with my 85. Right now I'm using it
with my 9000 series 300.
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 8:26 PM, Mark J. Blair via cctalk <
>> cctalk at classiccmp.org> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>> On Nov 14, 2017, at 20:11, Ed Sharpe via cctalk <
>> cctalk at classiccmp.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>> wondervifcthec9122 drives,will work on 85?
>>>>
>>> I think I can guess what you meant to say there... :)
>>>
>>> I?ve ordered a PRM-85 (a modern reprogrammable ROM drawer replacement)
>>> which includes the HP-85B version of the Mass Storage ROM, and the
>> Extended
>>> Mass Storage ROM. Based on what I have read, I think that should let
my
>> A
>>> model use the newer 9122C drive, and other drives using either the
>> Amigo or
>>> SS-80 protocols.
>>>
>>> I?d like to get the 9122C mostly because I have a much easier time
>> finding
>>> 1.44M media than the older double density media. eBay and I don?t
talk,
>> so
>>> that limits my options a bit. If I had easy access to lots of 3.5? DD
>>> media, then I would consider getting one of the more plentiful (?)
other
>>> 3.5? HPIB floppy drives.
>>>
------------------------------
Message: 27
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2017 18:31:07 +0100 (CET)
From: Christian Corti <cc at informatik.uni-stuttgart.de>
To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts"
<cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Subject: Re: Playing with HP2640B
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1711171829260.29647 at linuxserv.home>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
On Fri, 17 Nov 2017, David Collins wrote:
Christian do you know the gauge of the wire you
used ? And the current?
It was a wire for cutting polystyrene blocks. The current was a fews
amperes, I think, driven off a bench power supply.
Christian
------------------------------
Message: 28
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2017 09:57:36 -0800
From: Chuck Guzis <cclist at sydex.com>
To: cctalk at
classiccmp.org
Subject: Re: Manchester University Joint System in the 1970s
Message-ID: <0ba9f9e5-3b8d-cbbb-5d91-e1a9b9f10e48 at sydex.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
On 11/17/2017 09:24 AM, Peter Allan via cctalk wrote:
I was a student at Manchester University from
1974 to 1980. During that
time I used the University of Manchester Regional Computer Centre (UMRCC)
computer system. The so-called Joint System consisted of a CDC 7600 with
an
ICL 1906A front end. We used to submit card decks
via a Systime (a PDP-11
clone, I believe) that functioned as a remote job entry service.
I am trying to find out information about the structure of those card
decks
(mine were used for shopping lists years ago),
and in particular, what
the
first card in the deck was that routed the job to
the correct computer.
I can't help you with your specific case, other than to mention that
Purdue University for a time used a 6500 front-ended by a couple of IBM
7094s (IIRC, and it's been a long time--could have been 7090s), that
might give you a clue. The VIM community wasn't large.
From my own experience with 6000s, the SCOPE 1BJ
overlay was heavily
modified by various sites. I imagine that the corresponding
code in
the SCOPE 2.x JS code was similarly tweaked.
--Chuck
End of cctalk Digest, Vol 38, Issue 16
**************************************