17 Jun
2020
17 Jun
'20
10:04 a.m.
These 2 have my vote as well....
I do not know, anyone using a text only mail reader anymore!
The one thing I would change here is removal of the
restriction on attachments.
Well, two things.. Getting rid of the cctalk/cctech split as well.
On Wednesday,
June 17, 2020 Rob Jarratt via cctalk <rob at jarratt.me.uk; robert.jarratt at
ntlworld.com; cctalk at classiccmp.org> wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From: cctalk <cctalk-bounces at classiccmp.org> On Behalf Of Al Kossow via
cctalk
Sent: 17 June 2020 13:55
To: cctalk at classiccmp.org
Subject: Re: Future of cctalk/cctech
I would agree with both of those too.
Rob
I wonder what you don't like about
"groups.io" Its pretty much a pure mailing
list?
Like all of the webby time-wasters, they don't have easy to mirror zipped
archives, because they want to to spend time hovering around clicking on their
sites.
http://www.classiccmp.org/pipermail/cctalk/
The one thing I would change here is removal of the restriction on attachments.
Well, two things.. Getting rid of the cctalk/cctech split as well. 
17 Jun
17 Jun
10:48 a.m.
On Wed, 17 Jun 2020, ED SHARPE @ AOHell.com via cctalk wrote:
These 2 have my vote as well....
I do not know, anyone using a text only mail reader anymore!
> The one thing I would change here is removal of the restriction on attachments.
> Well, two things.. Getting rid of the cctalk/cctech split as well.
I read this list on PINE, on a shell account at my ISP.
In this group, I doubt that I am the only one.
Can we restrict to TEXT emails?
--
Grumpy Ol' Fred cisin at xenosoft.com
11:55 a.m.
On Wed, 17 Jun 2020, Fred Cisin via cctalk wrote:
I read this list on PINE, on a shell account at my
ISP.
Barbarian! At least upgrade to Alpine. (That's what I use.) :D
g.
--
Proud owner of F-15C 80-0007
http://www.f15sim.com - The only one of its kind.
http://www.diy-cockpits.org/coll - Go Collimated or Go Home.
Some people collect things for a hobby. Geeks collect hobbies.
ScarletDME - The red hot Data Management Environment
A Multi-Value database for the masses, not the classes.
http://scarlet.deltasoft.com - Get it _today_!
1:41 p.m.
New subject: mail on spool as G-d intended was Re: Future of cctalk/cctech
I read this
list on PINE, on a shell account at my ISP.
Barbarian! At least upgrade to Alpine. (That's what I use.) :D 
1:44 p.m.
New subject: mail on spool as G-d intended was Re: Future of cctalk/cctech
On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 01:41:39PM -0700, Cameron Kaiser via cctalk wrote:
Philistines, all of you. I use a hacked version of Elm.
mutt!
I read this list on PINE, on a shell account at my
ISP.
Barbarian! At least upgrade to Alpine. (That's what I use.) :D --
------------------------------------ personal: http://www.cameronkaiser.com/ --
Cameron Kaiser * Floodgap Systems * www.floodgap.com * ckaiser at floodgap.com
-- Never interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake. -- Napoleon --------
--
- db at FreeBSD.org db at db.net http://www.db.net/~db
1:54 p.m.
New subject: mail on spool as G-d intended was Re: Future of cctalk/cctech
> > > I read this list on PINE, on a shell
account at my ISP.
> > Barbarian! At least upgrade to Alpine.
(That's what I use.) :D
> Philistines, all of you. I use a hacked version
of Elm.
mutt!
`less`, out of system spool.
De
2:15 p.m.
New subject: mail on spool as G-d intended was Re: Future of cctalk/cctech
> I read
this list on PINE, on a shell account at my ISP.
Barbarian! At least upgrade to Alpine. (That's what I use.) :D
Philistines, all of you. I use a hacked version of Elm. 
7:32 p.m.
New subject: mail on spool as G-d intended was Re: Future of cctalk/cctech
On Jun 17, 2020, at 3:46 PM, Diane Bruce via cctalk
<cctalk at classiccmp.org> wrote:
?On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 01:41:39PM -0700, Cameron Kaiser via cctalk wrote:
Philistines, all of you. I use a hacked version of Elm.
mutt!
Ya! Exactly. Woof.
cje
I read this list on PINE, on a shell account at my
ISP.
Barbarian! At least upgrade to Alpine. (That's what I use.) :D 
18 Jun
18 Jun
5:33 a.m.
New subject: mail on spool as G-d intended was Re: Future of cctalk/cctech
On Wed, 2020-06-17 16:44:26 -0400, Diane Bruce via cctalk <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
wrote:
On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 01:41:39PM -0700, Cameron
Kaiser via cctalk wrote:
Philistines, all of you. I use a hacked version of Elm.
mutt!
Indeed. I get quite a lot of emails and mutt allows me to properly
fight back.
MfG, JBG
--
I read this list on PINE, on a shell account at my
ISP.
Barbarian! At least upgrade to Alpine. (That's what I use.) :D 
17 Jun
17 Jun
7:31 p.m.
New subject: mail on spool as G-d intended was Re: Future of cctalk/cctech
On Jun 17, 2020, at 3:43 PM, Cameron Kaiser via cctalk
<cctalk at classiccmp.org> wrote:
?
Philistines, all of you. I use a hacked version of Elm.
And what?s wrong with Mutt?
I have yet to suffer a phishing attack with that.
Chris
I read this list on PINE, on a shell account at
my ISP.
Barbarian! At least upgrade to Alpine. (That's what I use.) :D 
18 Jun
18 Jun
3:03 p.m.
New subject: mail on spool as G-d intended was Re: Future of cctalk/cctech
I used to use netcat, but now I just watch an oscilloscope.
On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 1:41 PM Cameron Kaiser via cctalk <
cctalk at classiccmp.org> wrote:
Philistines, all of you. I use a hacked version of Elm.
--
------------------------------------ personal:
http://www.cameronkaiser.com/ --
Cameron Kaiser * Floodgap Systems * www.floodgap.com *
ckaiser at floodgap.com
-- Never interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake. -- Napoleon
--------
--
Eric Korpela
korpela at ssl.berkeley.edu
AST:7731^29u18e3
I read this list on PINE, on a shell account at my
ISP.
Barbarian! At least upgrade to Alpine. (That's what I use.) :D 
4:21 p.m.
New subject: mail on spool as G-d intended was Re: Future of cctalk/cctech
On 18/06/2020 23:03, Eric Korpela via cctalk wrote:
I used to use netcat, but now I just watch an
oscilloscope.
Reminds me of a cartoon in a HiFi mag several years ago. Enthusiast
talking to friend in front of dual 'scopes, "Why listen to it when I can
see it's perfect?"
--
Pete
Pete Turnbull
4:46 p.m.
New subject: mail on spool as G-d intended was Re: Future of cctalk/cctech
Sometimes I'll log into alembic and read my mail with BABYL.
On 6/18/2020 6:03 PM, Eric Korpela via cctalk wrote:
I used to use netcat, but now I just watch an
oscilloscope.
On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 1:41 PM Cameron Kaiser via cctalk <
cctalk at classiccmp.org> wrote:
Philistines, all of you. I use a hacked version of Elm.
--
------------------------------------ personal:
http://www.cameronkaiser.com/ --
Cameron Kaiser * Floodgap Systems * www.floodgap.com *
ckaiser at floodgap.com
-- Never interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake. -- Napoleon
--------
I read this list on PINE, on a shell account at my
ISP.
Barbarian! At least upgrade to Alpine. (That's what I use.) :D 
17 Jun
17 Jun
2:20 p.m.
On Jun 17, 2020, at 10:48 AM, Fred Cisin via cctalk <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
wrote:
On Wed, 17 Jun 2020, ED SHARPE @ AOHell.com via cctalk wrote:
Why?
Pine/Alpine should show the text portion of any multipart messages perfectly reasonably,
and not even attempt to download non-text MIME content from your IMAP server. Crispin
designed the application and the protocol that way intentionally; his approach was always
that you should be able to run your MUA locally with just a 2400bps link to your IMAP
server, and get perfectly reasonable performance.
-- Chris
These 2 have my vote as well....
I do not know, anyone using a text only mail reader anymore!
> The one thing I would change here is removal of the restriction on attachments.
> Well, two things.. Getting rid of the cctalk/cctech split as well.
I read this list on PINE, on a shell account at my ISP.
In this group, I doubt that I am the only one.
Can we restrict to TEXT emails? 
2:06 p.m.
On Wed, 17 Jun 2020 at 19:04, ED SHARPE via cctalk
<cctalk at classiccmp.org> wrote:
I do not know, anyone using a text only mail reader
anymore!
Several of my colleagues at a Prominent German Linux Distributor use
Mutt/Neomutt. I don't, I am on Thunderbird and rather like it.
--
Liam Proven ? Profile: https://about.me/liamproven
Email: lproven at cix.co.uk ? gMail/gTalk/gHangouts: lproven at gmail.com
Twitter/Facebook/LinkedIn/Flickr: lproven ? Skype: liamproven
UK: +44 7939-087884 ? ?R (+ WhatsApp/Telegram/Signal): +420 702 829 053
1648
days inactive
1649
days old
18 comments
17 participants
participants (17)
-
ama＠ugr.es -
bfranchuk＠jetnet.ab.ca -
chrise＠pobox.com -
cisin＠xenosoft.com -
cmhanson＠eschatologist.net -
couryhouse＠aol.com -
cz＠alembic.crystel.com -
db＠db.net -
drb＠msu.edu -
ethan＠757.org -
geneb＠deltasoft.com -
jbglaw＠lug-owl.de -
korpela＠ssl.berkeley.edu -
linimon＠lonesome.com -
lproven＠gmail.com -
pete＠dunnington.plus.com -
spectre＠floodgap.com