1 Oct
2012
1 Oct
'12
1:13 p.m.
Cameron Kaiser wrote:
gopher://
Yes, but the ftp:// would have already existed. A gopher:// URL would
require him to run gopherd, right?
Peace... Sridhar
(http://ftp.rodents-montreal.org/mouse/blah/). I
don't recall why I
initially started running it; the most plausible reason I can think of
offhand is to shut up people who were whining about having to
(horrors!) use something other than a Web browser to look at my stuff.
I've been using a web browser to transfer files from anonymous FTP sites
for years, as have many others. Why didn't they just use an ftp:// URL?