- test-drb@ccmp.vtda.org - classiccmp.org

by mhstein＠canada.com

Sounds like a worthwhile project. Can't tell you why they used the 6520, can only speculate, same as you, that it's intended to sit on the 6500 bus while the DL1416s are a little more generic and might not interface directly without some additional logic & decoding anyway and using up more address space to boot. Also, since they brought a number of signals out to the display board that were not used, I suppose they might have intended to provide maximum flexibility; I'd think that no matter what signals & timing a display might require, you can generate it with the PIA and the wiring would be there, while you might not have what you need available on the bus without some extra glue anyway. BTW, I've used 6821s & 6520s interchangeably as well without problems. Not sure what you're looking for; the E & F ROMS are very well documented in the separate monitor manual which is on R Cini's site AFAIK (and in your care package waiting to go out), and if you wanted machine-readable source, the AIM itself should easily be able to disassemble the ROMs & send the source out on the serial port for capture. I've done some hacking of the monitor; my main accomplishment was to reverse & turn the printing upside down to allow mounting the board vertically with the tape feeding down, some graphic stuff, and trivial stuff like autostarting the user program, etc. I wouldn't think that the software to drive an LCD display would be very difficult; as I recall, there are hooks and vectors in place for user I/O. Of course even as it is, using the TTY switch the display is echoed out the serial port, but cursor movement codes might be incompatible with an ASCII Serial display. And I did find some extra DL1416s, although that won't help you with the unit that doesn't have a display board mike -------------Original Message-------------- Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2002 11:01:43 -0700 (PDT) From: Ethan Dicks <erd_6502(a)yahoo.com> Subject: AIM-65 displays I am evaluating building a replacement display for the AIM-65 that does not use the DL1416. I have several modern options - a 20x1 LCD is cheap enough, as are more modern 4-char ASCII LED displays. The interface is somewhat trivial - the connector on the AIM-65 mainboard has enough signals to talk to a 6520 PIA (since that's what is on the normal display board to begin with). There are couple of angles to pursue... I have successfully tested a Motorola 6821 in place of the Rockwell 6520 in a real AIM-65. Since I have a few 6520s and many 6821s, that's a win. Either way, it's trivial to hang a display off of the 6502 bus without a PIA in the way. I'm curious if anyone knows why they bothered to put a 6520 on the display card? Did they want to keep the bus loading to a small, known quantity? If so, then I'll consider that any ASCII LED solution I come up with needs to have appropriate signal conditioning. I can't see how a modern LCD display would load the bus any worse than a 6520, so it might be worth the direct approach. So... the hardware is no big deal. The software, though, could be lots more work. I have real ROMs and ROM images. Are there any sources to the AIM-65 ROMs that are in a state to be compiled back into working, matching binaries? If I'm going to change the nature of the display, the code will have to follow. If the code is changing, then there's no reason I can't experiment with a multi-line display - I have a 20x4 VCD and a 20X4 LCD display already in hand. I think I can locate a 40x2 in my junk box, but at first, I'll probably ignore the right half and if I used it, treat it like a 20x2. Is there anyone out there who has done any real AIM-65 hacking? I can start from zero if I have to, but if there's any preexisting work out there, I'd like to see about starting ahead of zero. - -ethan

24 years, 1 month

2
1
0 0

Indigos and such (Was Re: IRIX)

by csmith＠amdocs.com

> -----Original Message----- > From: Sean 'Captain Napalm' Conner [mailto:spc@conman.org] > I used a Personal Iris 4D 35 at school. It came with IRIX > 3.3.2 which > used NeWS (Network Window System) for the GUI which was quite I didn't know IRIX ever used it. That's interesting. > fast (despite > being based on PostScript) and easily extensible, but that Despite being based on Postscript? :) Postscript must be easily more efficient than the X11 protocol ;) NeWS was (is) also supported under SunOS 4. For a while, the server was actually merged with the X11 server in a program called XNeWS. You could run the apps side-by-side. Chris Christopher Smith, Perl Developer Amdocs - Champaign, IL /usr/bin/perl -e ' print((~"\x95\xc4\xe3"^"Just Another Perl Hacker.")."\x08!\n"); '

24 years, 1 month

1
0
0 0

Indigos and such (Was Re: IRIX)

by csmith＠amdocs.com

> -----Original Message----- > From: Jason McBrien [mailto:jbmcb@hotmail.com] > Are Personal Irises good for anything? I've got two, a 25 > and a 35 and > they seem to work but I don't have a monitor or keyboard for Good for running IRIX 4.x or 5.x. They have no audio without a special option, possibly, so you'll want to check the configurations out. Also, as with other SGI systems, the graphics boards can make a big diference. Make sure they have all the plastic "skin," or they'll have cooling problems. I think the monitor and keyboard are the same as Indigo, but I'm not certain. Chris Christopher Smith, Perl Developer Amdocs - Champaign, IL /usr/bin/perl -e ' print((~"\x95\xc4\xe3"^"Just Another Perl Hacker.")."\x08!\n"); '

24 years, 1 month

2
1
0 0

Fluke 9010 Micro-System Troubleshooter ??

by troy.haag＠baesystems.com

Does anyone know where I could pick up/buy one of these pieces of test equipment?

24 years, 1 month

5
4
0 0

Anyone Care About RT-11

by cdl＠proxima.ucsd.edu

> Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2002 08:46:25 -0700 (PDT) > From: Ethan Dicks <erd_6502(a)yahoo.com> > Subject: Re: Anyone Care About RT-11 > To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org > In-Reply-To: <3CC7778C.D5B157B3(a)compsys.to> > > > --- "Jerome H. Fine" <jhfinepw4z(a)compsys.to> wrote: > > ...I also acquired some RK05 packs with old RT-11 distributions that I > > hope to make available as soon as I can find a controller for a Qbus > > or someone with both a working RK05 and something more > > recent such as an RL02. From the RL02, the final step is to > > make copies available via a CD. > > I have an RKV11D, numerous Qbus boxes and processors (this one came > attached to an 11/03, but I have lots of KDF11 stuff and one KDJ11 > that I have yet to power on (it has a BA213 handle which I haven't > removed yet, and it does not fit into a BA11N or BA23 as-is). I > also have RLV11s and RLV12s and RL02 drives in close enough proximity > to be useful. I haven't fired up the RK05 in several years, so I'm not > sure about the state of the rubber parts, etc., but it's all accessible > and somewhat easy to reassemble. It worked the last time I used it. > > I presume the RK11D does, but I wasn't sure how interchangable they > were fron a driver standpoint (Unibus and Qbus drivers can have issues > with mapping registers being handled differently, etc. Assumptions of > intercompatibility are unwise; we had completely different drivers for > our Unibus and Qbus products back in the old days). The RKV11D is really an RK11D with a different bus interface. Sort of a built-in Qniverter. Unfortunately the designers skimped on the extended address bits, so the RKV11 is 16-bit address space. I think that hardware hacks to add two address bits to make the RKV11 compatible with the RK!1 have been published, but I don't remember where. carl -- carl lowenstein marine physical lab u.c. san diego clowenstein(a)ucsd.edu

24 years, 1 month

5
6
0 0

M0006

by Antonio.Carlini＠riverstonenet.com

>Why whould it have been left behind in my 11/750 though? Shouldn't it >have been taken when the contract ended? They should have collected it when the machine came off maintenance. Someone probably forgot. Not too uncommon towards the end. Antonio

24 years, 1 month

4
3
0 0

Tape Crimper for 7/9-Track Magtape

by dquebbeman＠acm.org

One of these with the Digital label is going for ten bucks on E-Pay, with a thirty-buck buy-it-now and a ten buck S&H. Too high, but these are pretty obscure and getting moreso. Anyone got a pile of them? -dq

24 years, 1 month

1
0
0 0

Googling and "egg-sucking" (was Re: "Toy" computers...)

by csmith＠amdocs.com

> -----Original Message----- > From: Doc [mailto:doc@mdrconsult.com] > On Mon, 29 Apr 2002, Douglas H. Quebbeman wrote: > > It gets a lot of raised eyebrows at my current orkplace, but then > Is this related to the Gollum phrasing? Read the alt.sysadmin.recovery FAQ. Chris Christopher Smith, Perl Developer Amdocs - Champaign, IL /usr/bin/perl -e ' print((~"\x95\xc4\xe3"^"Just Another Perl Hacker.")."\x08!\n"); '

24 years, 1 month

1
0
0 0

AIM-65 monitor sources now available

by hansp＠aconit.org

Following an earlier thread on AIM-65, I would like to announce the availablility at www.aconit.org/hbp/AMI-65 of source files which assemble to the AIM-65 ROM monitor. The sources generally follow the PDF scans also on that page execpt in a couple of instances where source code changes were necessitated by bugs in the assembler. Hopefully I will fix the assembler soon and the original sources will then assemble clean. Also included on that page is a 6502 assembler (C source and DOS executable) slightly modified from a version picked off the net. -- hbp

24 years, 1 month

2
2
0 0

M0006

by Antonio.Carlini＠riverstonenet.com

>On closer inspection, the VAX 11/750 board that I have marked "Property > of DEC, Not For Sale" is an M0006 - a Remote Diagnosis board. What can > you people tell me about it? This was used by DEC to dial in to the computer over a telephone line and manage it as though someone were typing at the console. It used an unpublished protocol between the kit at DEC's end ad the box at your end. Technically the box still belongs to DEC ... or maybe COMPAQ ... or soon HP. The support engineer at DEC's end could do whatever he liked to your machine, but everyhting he did was recorded by the support centre's systems. Antonio

24 years, 1 month

4
4
0 0

Googling and "egg-sucking" (was Re: "Toy" computers...)

by dquebbeman＠acm.org

> On Mon, 29 Apr 2002, Ethan Dicks wrote: > > > --- Doc <doc(a)mdrconsult.com> wrote: > > > > I was 35 when I found that the entire English-speaking > > > world doesn't "put stuff up" (put stuff away). > > > > I don't think we "put stuff up" (except for curtains, wallpaper and > > posters ;-), but here, we talk about cars and dishes that "need washed" > > (as opposed to "needs wash*ing*" or "needs *to be* washed"). > > What really drives my (Massachusetts-born) Spousal Equivalent up the > wall is when I'm [about to, going to] "fixing to" do something. Oh, we have a great one around here- "take and leave", as in "take and leave your car here, and we'll fix it". It's likely related to the usage as in "he's taken to drinking", which around here becomes "he's took to drinkun". A drinking buddy who was a mechanic would flame on when he'd hear that phrase. "Fair to middlin'" is my usual response to the casual how-are-you. It gets a lot of raised eyebrows at my current orkplace, but then we have many transplants there, and I'm local. -dq

24 years, 1 month

4
3
0 0

"Toy" computers http://www.conmicro.cx/hercules

by csmith＠amdocs.com

> -----Original Message----- > From: Raymond Moyers [mailto:rmoyers@nop.org] > They don't pay those costly License fees and support contracts > out of ignorance. todays mainframes are exteamly muscular, > having taken advantage of the same technical advancements Indeed. I would probably buy one regardless of the cost that the power bill would cause me. :) > Well, i had assumed most would know that a box that typically > served 5000 seats or more was powerfull even as most might > not know what it is that really sets these things apart. That's exactly where the misunderstanding came in, I think. It's taken as obvious, for the most part, but your statement that the entire campus full of hardware would be emulated on a single peesee seemed to say differently. At any rate, it makes much more sense now. > Channel I/O for example, translating to terms and concepts > more familiar to those without OPER console time, imagine a > "PC" where every orifice was pumped by its own dedicated > DMA controller, where you can have 65535 of these devices. > and fill em all up with no load on the CPU. Not having much time on mainframe systems, myself, I still imagined something like this, and you can pretty much infer it from talk of the things. > Remember when the mickysoft press release parroting nattering > nabob computer press was declaring the death of the mainframe ? They're not still doing it? That surprises me. > and very humorous events like when the idiot press would read a > product release about NT being ported to an FSIOP card, and run > to print "NT Ported to the mainframe ! " I would like to see that, actually -- the article, I mean. VM/NT -- Heh. I wonder what the "error number" is for all of the NT IOPs in the machine simultaneously jumbling up their RAM. > A FSIOP card, File Server I/O Processor, is a PC on a card that > plugs into the mainframe so that it can share mainframe DASD > (disk) or have a faster channel for I/O to PC based middleware, > it certainly isn't NT running on the mainframe in the manner > the hapless readers of these sorry articles was led to believe. I suppose such a product would be good if you need it. It could do better than to run NT. Maybe they should "port CP/M" to the mainframe. > As for CPU power, PC's are certainly as fast per CPU in a general > sense as a mainframe, but without the I/O capacity could never > hope to replace a mainframe anytime soon. I don't know exact numbers, but honestly, the CPU in a modern peesee isn't the weak spot at all. Generally there's some kind of bottleneck (or five) that needs repaired in the design. > The PC running something decent does rival the power of a > mainframe or a supercomputer of yesterday however, I wouldn't doubt that it might compare for certain (probably single-user) non-io-bound applications. I'm not sure I can make that conclusion for a supercomputer at all. When is "yesterday" in this context? :) > utter garbage that at last time i checked w2k needed 64megs > of ram for the installer to run ? how absurd ! Actually, I'd have expected it to need more than that. > Compare with the size of bsd/linux/unix that will still run on > a machine with 4megs or compare with a mainframe nucleus > and you see that they on the other hand, have stayed small > tight and fast. and assembler is still very mainstream > on the mainframe where thruput of massive loads is still > the focus. Your comment about mainframes having "stayed small" is oddly amusing, but perhaps it's because I got no sleep yesterday. > mips or so emulating 360/70/90 instructions is testament > that the lowly PC has become very muscular in its own right. Indeed. I'm sure there are some tasks to which a peesee is well suited, but the problem is -- aside from the common operating environment -- the baggage in the design, still hanging around from the beginning. (probably not too well-thought-out back then ;) They probably should have done something ground-up by now to take advantage of newer cores, bus technology, etc. Chris Christopher Smith, Perl Developer Amdocs - Champaign, IL /usr/bin/perl -e ' print((~"\x95\xc4\xe3"^"Just Another Perl Hacker.")."\x08!\n"); '

24 years, 1 month

2
1
0 0

R.I.P. for D.I.Y.

by ajp166＠bellatlantic.net

From: Jos Dreesen <jos.mar(a)bluewin.ch> >Industrial prototyping, which is what you do, is NOT hobbyist electronics. >I still stand by my opinion that handling the modern devices is beyond hobbyist >means. Ok, so you say. I just got done building two 50mhz frequency counters using SMT parts. The board is 1.8x2.1 inches and the display is 4 digit module with .375" 7 segment leds. The assembly includes 6 transistors (SOT) and a 74HC4017 (SMT) plus the Amtel (20pin dip) micro and associated chip resistors, caps and diodes. The resistors were the large 1206 (.11x.06") parts. There were a total of 5 through hole parts if you count the crystal and display. With a low power magnifier, standard weller 3/64" tip, .022 silver bearing solder, and a pair of #3 tweezers it went together quite fast. The last time I built an equivelent frequency counter it was 4 74192, 2x74273, 4x7447, 4x man3a leds, 2x74390, 2x 7400 plus all the caps, resistors and transistors and if didn't fit on a 2x2" board or only draw 60mA! At that time (1984) that cost me nearly 40$ in chips alone and I had to make the board. If anything, for those willing to adapt I'd say there are possibilities available now that never were. Lets face it, back in say '84 the thought of using a micro for a trivial task was sorta over the top, they weren't all that cheap or all that flexible. Now with basic stamps, PICs, amtel and the like a really good selection of flash rom parts at attractive prices and fast enough to do serious tasks or cheap enough to do dumb thing like PC keyboard to serial or parallel ascii. One of the things going on in the ham (amateur radio) community is packing PICs, DDS and a simple transceiver in an altoids tin (3.5x.75x2.25"). Oh and people still build boat anchors too. Allison

24 years, 1 month

5
4
0 0

YangTech Electric VIP Model PC800

by tarsi＠binhost.com

Anyone seen one of these buggers before? It's a Yangtech Electric Co. Ltd. VIP Model PC800 desktop computer. Made in Taiwan. Looks like a 8088 or 80286 Intel CPU, but I can't seem to find chips with significant marks. Has one 20MB MFM HD on it, a 5.25 and a 3.5 floppy. Durn thing doesn't boot, and I can't find docs or anything on it. Any information is handy...likely it's not a significant find, but I'm intrigued nonetheless. Thanks, Tarsi 210

24 years, 1 month

1
0
0 0

bubble bags

by lemay＠cs.umn.edu

Well, I went and bought a ton of those pink anti-static bubble bags so I can properly store my spare DEC boards. If anyone wants to buy a bunch, just let me know. I'll have to go dig up the sales slip and figure out a cost. They just barely fit a hex DEC board, and thus they easily fit a Quad board. 10" X 15.5" plus a 1.5" sealable lip. Though personally I dont bother sealing the bags. -Lawrence LeMay lemay(a)cs.umn.edu

24 years, 1 month

1
0
0 0

"Toy" computers http://www.conmicro.cx/hercules

by rmoyers＠nop.org

On Saturday 27 April 2002 16:28, you wrote: > > Today that campus worth of hardware is emulated in the hercules > > s360/370/390/ zSeries emulator http://www.conmicro.cx/hercules > > running on a PC running linux or winbloZ > > > > OS, DOS, MVS, VM ... running on your pc, serves x3270 > > terms over the network etc etc. > > Ow! You're killing me! Actually, its sort of unexpected that you havent been pointed to this project or found this on your own. Its certainly a less cost option than a P370/390 card These guys for example have a turnkey cdrom image where you can go from the cd burner to a TSO login in only a few minutes. A real box can total flood a bundle of gigabit fiber the diameter of your right leg, its the I/O that sets these monsters apart really, their CPUs are no slouch, but not any faster than a common modern PC chip. Course there is their memory scrubing, the ability to hotspare memory modules on the fly, redundancy that can even deal with failed cache and buss lines. After reading about all the bother they go to to make these things survive failures and glitches, it brings to mind a senario where you wonder how many .45 cal pistol slugs the machine could absorb before the failure handler could no longer cope. There is a paper that explains the systems and schemes that go into the machines hardware fault tolerance that would leave the first time readers jaw agape, but i cant dig up the url at present. The emulator is still a very worthwhile project to look at however, and despite me using it first as a brickbat its rather cool and usefull for doing real work. (Development at home etc) Raymond -------------------------------------------------------

24 years, 1 month

7
8
0 0

IBM AT power supply case/cooling question

by mythtech＠mac.com

>If you're at all >worried about EMI, it might be reassuring to put some ferrous metal screen, >the sort used to repair, or scavenged from, OLD screen doors, not the new >ones, over the PSU's larger openings. Does the metal screen material you can buy at Home Depot or the likes work? I think it is made of Aluminum, but I've never really checked (as I find the nylon screen easier to work with, so that is what I have always bought when rescreening windows or doors) -chris <http://www.mythtech.net>

24 years, 1 month

2
1
0 0

Starting point

by acme_ent＠bellsouth.net

> From: Tony Duell <ard(a)p850ug1.demon.co.uk> > There was one big advantage to starting from a home computer rather than > just a CPU chip. You had a 'base system' that included enough software to > PEEK/POKE bytes to your homebrew add-on for testing. That alone made life > a lot easier when you wwre starting out. Tony! This is exactly the point I was making a few months ago about the ZX81. At that time, you said you'd prefer to start with a Z80 and build up >from there, while I suggested that the ZX81 was a better starting point for a homebrew system since the BASIC and video were built-in. Care to clarify? Glen 0/0

24 years, 1 month

3
3
0 0

Googling and "egg-sucking" (was Re: "Toy" computers...)

by dquebbeman＠acm.org

> --- Doc <doc(a)mdrconsult.com> wrote: > > On Sun, 28 Apr 2002, Peter C. Wallace wrote: > > > On Sun, 28 Apr 2002, Doc wrote: > > > > Dude. > > > > Fire up your favorite Open Source browser. Go to http://www.google.com > > > > Do a search for this (quotation marks included): > > > > "Teach Grandpa to suck eggs" > > > BTW Google doesn't find the quoted string... > I got one hit with this... "teaching grandpa to suck eggs" > > And a bunch more by using the exact phraseology I heard growing up... > > "teach your grandma to suck eggs" > > With Google, spelling (and precise word selection) counts. > > > Argh. > > Once again, what I thought was a universal expression turns out to be > > a Texasism. > > I would count it as an American Colloquialism, but I don't think of the > phrase as uniquely Texan. Today, we might get more mileage out of this with a slight retooling: "You don't teach Gollem to suck eggses" ;)

24 years, 1 month

2
1
0 0

R.I.P. for D.I.Y."

by dquebbeman＠acm.org

> OK, but these are not the kind of devices I was refering to. > I have seen the immense effort that goes into prototyping GSM phones. That is > which lead to my opinion that such development is beyond any hobbiest means. I'm not sure I understand this. Are the GSM prototypes with which you are familiar, FINISHED prototypes, i.e. same size, circuits, etc, as the final product? If so, I'd understand the difficulty, but that is a form of prototyping that I'm only familiar with through the efforts of non-technical people to get involved in the hi-tech field. I guess it gets done that way a lot, and this is likely the source of the devices we swear at. Usually, the prototypes I've developed, are what we refer to as level-1 prototypes. They demonstrate the basic concept as being workable. At level-2. you bring in accountants and marketing people to work with the engineers to see if the device can be produced in a cost-effevtive manner, wherein the beanheads determine that they'll actually be able to make a profit >from the manufacture and sale of the item. Many otherwise promising designs die here because the engineer won't let the beancounter substitute that switch that will break at the device's half-life, or because the engineer won't let the marketing guy make the device purple and yellow. Good for the bloody engineer, too... -dq

24 years, 1 month

3
2
0 0

CP/M-86

by csmith＠amdocs.com

> -----Original Message----- > From: Fred Cisin (XenoSoft) [mailto:cisin@xenosoft.com] > On Sat, 27 Apr 2002, Pat Finnegan wrote: > > I've been playing around with cp/m-86, and was wondering if > anyone knew if > > a multiuser (like MP/M) version was available somewhere? > My next step is > > to try making it work under Dosemu on Linux if I cant... > Have you looked at "Concurrent CP/M-86"? "Concurrent DOS" in later versions, right? Chris Christopher Smith, Perl Developer Amdocs - Champaign, IL /usr/bin/perl -e ' print((~"\x95\xc4\xe3"^"Just Another Perl Hacker.")."\x08!\n"); '

24 years, 1 month

2
1
0 0

M0006

by Antonio.Carlini＠riverstonenet.com

>Antonio, you spoilsport :-P > I was going to ask Alex for his phone number! So do you have the CSC-end of the kit that you will need to do that? I'm assuming that since they want to all the trouble of producing something marginally secure, the customer end of the secure connection cannot be used to dial out to some other customer end (otherwise it would not have been *that* secure). If you *do* have the CSC-end of the kit I'm seriously impressed :-) Although until Alex fixes his +2.5V regulator, there's not much you can do ! Antonio >

24 years, 1 month

3
2
0 0

Commodore PC-20-III

by spectre＠stockholm.ptloma.edu

Well, I'm now the (proud?) owner of a Commodore PC-20-III. Ironically, this is a Commodore I know little about although it is a more or less vanilla PC clone, but there are some weird things about it. First, there's a composite video out on it. What kind of graphics did these have in them? I haven't cracked the case yet, but there's also apparently a video card in one of the slots (with six DIP switches? used for what?) and a two-port card with two DB-15s on it that I can't immediately identify. Anyone out there own one of these and can tell me a little about it? -- ----------------------------- personal page: http://www.armory.com/~spectre/ -- Cameron Kaiser, Point Loma Nazarene University * ckaiser(a)stockholm.ptloma.edu -- If at first you don't succeed, don't go skydiving. -------------------------

24 years, 1 month

6
9
0 0

Apple II Unidisk 3.5/LIRON card

by r_beaudry＠hotmail.com

Hello all (except Dick :-) ), I'm having a problem with an Apple IIe Platinum, and I hope you can help. I recently acquired a LIRON 3.5" floppy controller card, and was looking forward to using 3.5" disks on my AIIe. After some reading, it seemed that the LIRON card would only work with a Unidisk 3.5" (model number starts with "A2M"), and NOT with a 3.5" drive from, say, a IIgs (model number starts with "A9M"). So, of course, I went and found a Unidisk 3.5" drive... The combination doesn't work, *even with every other card pulled*, so here are my questions: - Will the LIRON card work with the Unidisk 3.5" drive? My reading of several FAQs says "yes", but maybe I misread something... - Does anyone have docs for either the drive, or the card? There are no switches or jumpers, and the installation seems obvious, but who knows, maybe I missed something.... - Can you boot from the 3.5" drive? Or is it only for storage, and you can only boot with 5.25" drives? Thanks for any help! Rich B. _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp.

24 years, 1 month

3
3
0 0

"Toy" computers http://www.conmicro.cx/hercules

by csmith＠amdocs.com

> -----Original Message----- > From: Allison [mailto:ajp166@bellatlantic.net] > It has been done. At one time you could get "cp/m processor" > cards for VAX, > PDP-11 and several other machines. Most had several Z80s for multiple > users. Not exactly "mainframe," but do they come in QBus modules? :) That would make one hell of a CP/M machine. Chris Christopher Smith, Perl Developer Amdocs - Champaign, IL /usr/bin/perl -e ' print((~"\x95\xc4\xe3"^"Just Another Perl Hacker.")."\x08!\n"); '

24 years, 1 month

1
0
0 0

QBUS VAX and M7941 under VMS - info needed!

by dave＠naffnet.org.uk

Hi all, I have a MicroVAX (BA123 enclosure, KA650 CPU) that I would like to put to work... to this end I have two M7941 (DRV11) parallel I/O cards that I would like to bring into service. The Micronotes say that this card is compatible with the 22-bit QBUS, and I have the Field Service print set so I can set the CSR and vectors to appropriate values. Of course, VMS does not have a driver for these cards, but I am not too frightened by the prospect of a little code - here lies the problem! Can anyone tell me just how this card maps into the I/O space, given the CSR? I would like to know just where to read from and write to in order the drive the beastie... Thanks in advance for your help, Dave.

24 years, 1 month

1
1
0 0

"Toy" computers http://www.conmicro.cx/hercules

by ajp166＠bellatlantic.net

From: Christopher Smith <csmith(a)amdocs.com> >I suppose such a product would be good if you need it. It could do >better than to run NT. Maybe they should "port CP/M" to the mainframe. It has been done. At one time you could get "cp/m processor" cards for VAX, PDP-11 and several other machines. Most had several Z80s for multiple users. Allison

24 years, 1 month

2
1
0 0

No subject

by dpeschel＠eskimo.com

list classiccmp list classiccmp-digest

24 years, 1 month

1
0
0 0

"Toy" computers http://www.conmicro.cx/hercules

by csmith＠amdocs.com

> -----Original Message----- > From: Raymond Moyers [mailto:rmoyers@nop.org] > A real box can total flood a bundle of gigabit fiber > the diameter of your right leg, its the I/O that sets > these monsters apart really, their CPUs are no > slouch, but not any faster than a common modern > PC chip. So, by "emulated," you didn't mean to imply that they were emulated in such a manner as to be replaced by the peesee -- that is the misunderstanding here, I'm sure. :) Anyway, I've always subscribed to the school of thought which says that the CPU should do only that which can't be accomplished with special purpose chips. It makes things much more elegant. Chris Christopher Smith, Perl Developer Amdocs - Champaign, IL /usr/bin/perl -e ' print((~"\x95\xc4\xe3"^"Just Another Perl Hacker.")."\x08!\n"); '

24 years, 1 month

2
1
0 0

Open source -- non computer topics

by csmith＠amdocs.com

> -----Original Message----- > From: James B. DiGriz [mailto:jbdigriz@dragonsweb.org] > If you're saying that whether somebody is right or not, or whether > substantive matters of potentially great import hang on this, is more > important to some people than having their ass sucked, to the extent > that a Stallman's reasons don't even enter in, then you may > be right. So > what? It doesn't address the issues at all. Actually it's his presentation of those reasons that concerns me. I'm only re-iterating that he would find more sympathetic ears if he weren't so rigid about the whole thing. > Think we've reached the agree to disagree point here, Chief. > It's ceased > to be topical anyway. Suits me. There are certainly more important and interesting things to discuss. Chris Christopher Smith, Perl Developer Amdocs - Champaign, IL /usr/bin/perl -e ' print((~"\x95\xc4\xe3"^"Just Another Perl Hacker.")."\x08!\n"); '

24 years, 1 month

1
0
0 0

Open source -- non computer topics

by csmith＠amdocs.com

> -----Original Message----- > From: James B. DiGriz [mailto:jbdigriz@dragonsweb.org] > > If you mean that the FSF deserves some credit and respect, sure, > > but that's not the way for him to get the former, and it certainly > > has lost him lots of the latter, even if the project may still be > > relatively well thought of. > I think you can make the case that he isn't entirely > unjustified. He and In wanting credit? No, he's not unjustified at all. Only in demanding that the credit take whatever form he likes. :) > the FSF have a lot invested in it. I don't see anything more > objectionable in it than the average corporate trademark claim. It Well, you should see what I have to say about most of those. > certainly annoys a lot of people, though. It might behoove > him to find a > better way of dealilng with the issue if he can. I'll go > along with that. I'll say that it shows an incredible lack of taste and social grace on his part to take offense at everyone who doesn't see it his way (right or not...) That said, he can do what he likes -- I just may not agree with it. > The snide attempts at ad hominems are unwarranted, though. I hope that's not directed towards me. I'll say now that I have nothing against Richard Stallman personally. Only against some opinions that it seems he'd like codified into law. Any "fun" made of him is simply caricature to drive the point home. I have, though, thought about making a BSD/Linux in protest. ;) Chris Christopher Smith, Perl Developer Amdocs - Champaign, IL /usr/bin/perl -e ' print((~"\x95\xc4\xe3"^"Just Another Perl Hacker.")."\x08!\n"); '

24 years, 1 month

2
2
0 0

LJII Memory Cards

by DAW＠yalepress3.unipress.yale.edu

> From: Marvin Johnston > > I have two Memory cards for the HP Laserjet II, both with no > documentation. One is fully stuffed and looks to be 4 MB; the second is > partially stuffed and with what appears to be 1 MB. Best offer over > $10.00 for both plus shipping ($3.50 USPS Priority Mail) by Tuesday. > > If you are not going to follow through quickly, please don't make an > offer or say you want them. > - Does anyone know if these would work in a DEC Laser 2100? - If not, does anyone know of/have any memory for a DECLaser2100 that they are willing to part with? - I remember someone said they had an extra legal tray for an HP LaserJet II/III. That would fit in my (newly acquired) DECLaser 2100. Please e-mail me. -- --- David A Woyciesjes --- C & IS Support Specialist --- Yale University Press --- mailto:david.woyciesjes@yale.edu --- (203) 432-0953 --- ICQ # - 905818 Mac OS X 10.1.2 - Darwin Kernel Version 5.2: Fri Dec 7 21:39:35 PST 2001 Running since 01/22/2002 without a crash

24 years, 1 month

1
0
0 0

"Toy" computers (was Re: Micro$oft Biz'droid Lusers)

by csmith＠amdocs.com

> -----Original Message----- > From: Raymond Moyers [mailto:rmoyers@nop.org] > Today that campus worth of hardware is emulated in the hercules > s360/370/390/ zSeries emulator http://www.conmicro.cx/hercules > running on a PC running linux or winbloZ I do hope Sridhar will take his time to address this. :) Chris Christopher Smith, Perl Developer Amdocs - Champaign, IL /usr/bin/perl -e ' print((~"\x95\xc4\xe3"^"Just Another Perl Hacker.")."\x08!\n"); '

24 years, 1 month

3
2
0 0

I'm getting sick of this shit! Re: BS al a Erlacher

by xds_sigma7＠hotmail.com

I agree, I don't much like having 20 or so e-mails like that in my inbox... especially because hotmail will start deleting stuff when the mailbox is full enough! I personally junk apple IIs also, though I pitch the power supply and take the boards to the scrapyard. I have nothing against Dick, he's given me lots of neat stuff, and while I'm sure I don't share all of the same opinions that he does, what he does with his property is his own perogative. That's my 1865 2 cent piece worth, Will J _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp.

24 years, 1 month

2
1
0 0

"Toy" computers (was Re: Micro$oft Biz'droid Lusers)

by csmith＠amdocs.com

> -----Original Message----- > From: Sridhar the POWERful [mailto:vance@ikickass.org] > On Sat, 27 Apr 2002, Raymond Moyers wrote: > > OS, DOS, MVS, VM ... running on your pc, serves x3270 > > terms over the network etc etc. > Ow! You're killing me! Heh -- I was hoping for a more verbose reply, but that's ok. Chris Christopher Smith, Perl Developer Amdocs - Champaign, IL /usr/bin/perl -e ' print((~"\x95\xc4\xe3"^"Just Another Perl Hacker.")."\x08!\n"); '

24 years, 1 month

2
1
0 0

BS al a Erlacher

by acme_ent＠bellsouth.net

> From: r. 'bear' stricklin <red(a)bears.org> > On Tue, 23 Apr 2002, Richard Erlacher wrote: > > The year I got my first PC/AT (I used 'em at work all the time, but didn't get > > one at home for a while.) I bought a 25 MHz clone (NEAT architecture) with 8 > > MB RAM and a pair of 700 MB ESDI drives for $1080. That was with a 1kx768x16 > > VGA display board. I hacked it to work with a fixed-frequency (sync-on-green) > > monitor I had sitting around. It was WONDERFUL. That was in early '89. ['bear' replied:] > This struck me as being blatantly wrong, since it seemed to me (if I > recalled) that in early 1989 your 8 MB of RAM would've run nearly $1k by > itself. > > So I checked the January 1990 issue of "Byte". These are directly from the > cheap ads at the back, and representative of prices a year (loosely) > after your conjectured purchase date: [snip prices] > I admit some margin of error is to be expected, but these prices---sampled > fully eight or nine months after your stated date---do not come close to > corroborating your statements. In consideration of this, I must humbly > submit that you are totally full of shit, or at the very least have made a > grave typographical error. >From my files, an invoice from 1990: 25 MHz 80386, motherboard, case, power supply, 4MB RAM, 1.44 MB FDD, 100MB HD, no i/o, no video, no modem $1450, which is exactly in line with the prices you quoted. Ah, but we must remember that Richard buys Windows for $2. He never pays what we have to pay, nor does he stoop to using bullshit systems like we do (Apple, C64, Unix, Amiga). Richard Erlacher is simply a troll. Or an Alzheimer's victim. Or both. Yes, he has some "stuff" which he will sometimes share, but it's hardly worth the amount of crap we put up with here, not to mention that his crappy posts are deliberately formatted in a way which most classiccmpers find hard to read. > As for the rest of you honking geese Just a minute here! Some of my best friends are geese! http://members.aol.com/gusggoose Glen 0/0

24 years, 1 month

8
12
0 0

BS al a Erlacher

by csmith＠amdocs.com

> -----Original Message----- > From: Richard Erlacher [mailto:edick@idcomm.com] > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Pat Finnegan" <pat(a)purdueriots.com> > > Dick, do you actually have any interest in old machines or > are you just > If you'd read my earlier post, you'd know that my interest > was in giving away > the hardware I had available. The reason was that, while I > still use some of > the old boxes I have from back in the '70's, and while I > still use the ones > that do something the newer ones don't, or simply do it more > conveniently, I Sounds fair to me, though, I go further, and preserve hardware for the sake of "example," among other things. > don't have any interest in keeping non-functional or > redundant hardware lying > about. Just in case somebody complains about this response, I have to say that it sounds like a proper use of this list as far as I can tell. > number of replies instead that simply said, "I'll take it > all, ship it to ..." > with no offer to participate, say, by paying for the packing > and shipping. Normally if I were to tell somebody that, I'd be assuming that I'd at least have to pay the shipping, but if I ever write to you about something like that, I'll try to be clear on it. > itself. I wouldn't say I toy with 'em however. I hot-rod > the things from > time to time, just to see what sort of speed could have come > from them, under > circumstances that didn't then exist, but I certainly don't > pretend I see them > as being in any sense better than what's out there today. Better is, however, very subjective. :) > their grammar, > syntax, and orthography are clear evidence they've not even > read their own > writing, I can't possibly take them seriously. A pet peeve of mine too; you can't get away from those people, either. Some of them are even great people, but their writing is terrible. One thing I've wondered for a while -- and don't take this as an insult -- is, are you aware of the possible slang connotations in your user-name? Chris Christopher Smith, Perl Developer Amdocs - Champaign, IL /usr/bin/perl -e ' print((~"\x95\xc4\xe3"^"Just Another Perl Hacker.")."\x08!\n"); '

24 years, 1 month

1
0
0 0

Open source -- non computer topics

by csmith＠amdocs.com

> -----Original Message----- > From: James B. DiGriz [mailto:jbdigriz@dragonsweb.org] > Nah, I understand that Stallman and the FSF are under > constant probing > for any sign of a capitulatory mood, for any sign of Ok... > tolerance for being > made irrelvant, since they are using IP against itself, and a lot of > people stand to gain at everyone else's expense if they can > crack that Ok... > wall. That's the grounds for the GNU/linux controversy, and > no doubt why > he makes demands that are taken as overreaching to UG's that Huh? There's nothing in the license that says you have to give GNU credit in the popularly accepted name of your software. Trying to change that after the fact by throwing your weight around, so to speak, is certainly in poor taste. Richard "I won't talk to you unless you call your project by my pet name" Stallman has lost much of my respect over all of this. Of course, this is just my opinion, and you can certainly disagree. > want him to > speak. I don't envy his position. He has a point, too, even > if you think > it's overblown. Enough so that a lot of people would prefer If you mean that the FSF deserves some credit and respect, sure, but that's not the way for him to get the former, and it certainly has lost him lots of the latter, even if the project may still be relatively well thought of. Chris Christopher Smith, Perl Developer Amdocs - Champaign, IL /usr/bin/perl -e ' print((~"\x95\xc4\xe3"^"Just Another Perl Hacker.")."\x08!\n"); '

24 years, 1 month

2
1
0 0

Jan 82 article abt the IBM PC

by csmith＠amdocs.com

> -----Original Message----- > From: Raymond Moyers [mailto:rmoyers@nop.org] > Linux is making computing CPU agnostic however > and with a system that runs on anything, all that > matters for the hardware is price/performace. I thought NetBSD was about making computing CPU agnostic, and Linux was about giving it huggable plush mascots? ;) > In this new climate, perhaps the dark/ice age of > winblows dumbing down mankind will abate. I've been wishing for this to happen, but I see the world being no closer now that it has been. However, if you have any ideas as to how we can deliver the gospel of computer literacy to the unwashed masses, I'd love to hear them. Chris Christopher Smith, Perl Developer Amdocs - Champaign, IL /usr/bin/perl -e ' print((~"\x95\xc4\xe3"^"Just Another Perl Hacker.")."\x08!\n"); '

24 years, 1 month

1
0
0 0

Jan 82 article abt the IBM PC

by rmoyers＠nop.org

For those interested http://www.nop.org/misc/pics/ibmpc Im one of those that still has many of his old mags going back to the altair days. In the collection is the Jan 82 issue of Byte this article is about the IBM PC, and perhaps some may get a kick out of reading from scans of these yellowed pages Raymond

24 years, 1 month

3
4
0 0

I'm getting sick of this shit! Re: BS al a Erlacher

by rigdonj＠cfl.rr.com

At 11:56 PM 4/28/02 -0500, Pat wrote: >Since I haven't seen anyone ask this yet, I'll bite: > >Dick, do you actually have any interest in old machines or are you just >trolling the list? Pat, If you read the messages on the list you'd know better than to ask that question. All of the messages I've read from you lately strongly >imply that you have no real interest toying with or using the systems we >normally talk about on this list. If you're referring to him having no interest in preserving Apple IIs then I'm guilty as well and I'm sure that many people on this list are too. I might not remove the power supplies and pitch to rest but OTOH I don't save any either. Things like Apple IIs, IBMs, etc are just too common. If I saved everyone that I saw I'd not only fill my house but my entire property as well. If Disk can use the power supplies instead of throwing the entire Apple into the trash (or just leaving it in the trash) than I say good for him! Personally I'm getting sick of this flame war and I wish you guys would drop it. Joe > >I'm not trying to start a war, I'm just trying to ask an honest >question (and perhaps giving you a chance to redeem yourself from the >last round of flames). > >-- Pat > >On Sun, 28 Apr 2002, Richard Erlacher wrote: > >> Looks as though someone's p*ssed because he doesn't read and can't write and >> spell. >> >> Dick > > >

24 years, 1 month

2
1
0 0

Apology {RE: Sun help needed... [was: RE: ...

by DAW＠yalepress3.unipress.yale.edu

Oh boy... Looks like I managed to make myself look like some dumb-ass schizophrenic with a computer. When I really _only_ just a dumb-ass with a computer... Made the mistake of trying to send e-mail through an Exchange server >from Netscape using IMAP. The server lied and said it didn't send the message (that bastard!). That's why I tried two other ways... Many apologies to all for my screw-up. Please respond off-list... But does anyone have a better e-mail client recommendation? I have sub-folders on the server, which I'd need to get to... -- --- David A Woyciesjes --- C & IS Support Specialist --- Yale University Press --- mailto:david.woyciesjes@yale.edu --- (203) 432-0953 --- ICQ # - 905818 Mac OS X 10.1.2 - Darwin Kernel Version 5.2: Fri Dec 7 21:39:35 PST 2001 Running since 01/22/2002 without a crash

24 years, 1 month

1
0
0 0

M0006

by meltie＠myrealbox.com

On closer inspection, the VAX 11/750 board that I have marked "Property of DEC, Not For Sale" is an M0006 - a Remote Diagnosis board. What can you people tell me about it? Alex -- My computer's heavier than yours.

24 years, 1 month

1
0
0 0

Micro$oft Biz'droid Lusers (was: OT email response format)

by DAW＠yalepress3.unipress.yale.edu

> From: Doc > > On Fri, 26 Apr 2002, David Woyciesjes wrote: > > > Did someone say power cords??? I got a box of about 4 dozen if you need > any. > > Heh. I can get you about 4 dozen boxes of 'em.... > > Doc > Geezuz Kirsti.... -- --- David A Woyciesjes --- C & IS Support Specialist --- Yale University Press --- mailto:david.woyciesjes@yale.edu --- (203) 432-0953 --- ICQ # - 905818 Mac OS X 10.1.2 - Darwin Kernel Version 5.2: Fri Dec 7 21:39:35 PST 2001 Running since 01/22/2002 without a crash

24 years, 1 month

1
0
0 0

Commodore PC-20-III

by acme_ent＠bellsouth.net

> From: Cameron Kaiser <spectre(a)stockholm.ptloma.edu> > The BIOS identifies itself as (C)1986 Commodore Electronics Ltd and seems > to be a Phoenix type. I can't figure out how to get into the BIOS setup. > Neat feature: all the devices are identified with their detected port > addresses. Cameron: I have a generic Phoenix BIOS utility which I have used several times on PCs where I could not enter the BIOS setup program via keystrokes. Please * remind me* to send you this utility if you think it will be helpful to you as it is very late here and I will forget . . . Best regards, Glen 0/0

24 years, 2 months

2
1
0 0

"Toy" computers http://www.conmicro.cx/hercules

by rmoyers＠nop.org

On Sunday 28 April 2002 13:06, you wrote: > > Actually, its sort of unexpected that you haven't been > > pointed to this project or found this on your own. > > I found it long before you did, I guarantee you. Some of the code in that > project was written by yours truly. Then why the feigned ignorance then ? and I feel some tugging at my lower extremities. In fact... hmmm afu:/data1/OS/herc/mirror/Mail-archive-html/hercules-390-2000-Q1-Q3# grep -l "nop.org" * 0058.html afu:/data1/OS/herc/mirror/Mail-archive-html/hercules-390-2000-Q1-Q3# grep -i "date" 0058.html <strong>Date:</strong> Wed Mar 01 2000 - 19:43:55 GMT Ya know, ive been on the Herc mail list for a while and ... afu:/data1/OS/herc/mirror/Mail-archive-html/hercules-390-2000-Q1-Q3# grep -l "ikickass.org" * grep: att-0581: Is a directory afu:/data1/OS/herc/mirror/Mail-archive-html/hercules-390-2000-Q1-Q3# cd ../ afu:/data1/OS/herc/mirror/Mail-archive-html# grep -sirl "ikickass.org" * You are not in my archives mirror at all I think you are blowin smoke up my Butt. > Come back when you know what you are talking about. And my error was where ? non-seq tosser too i see. > (BTW, from your previous argument, I was *on the team that ported Linux to > S/390 at Marist College* Linux was not ported at marist, it was a skunkworks project @ IBM itself ( with much work done @ IBM Germany) Marist had the first starter kits. http://newsforge.com/article.pl?sid=02/04/25/2151204&mode=nocomment&tid=23 At age 28, Boas Betzler is known at IBM as the "grandfather" of Linux on the mainframe. In mid-1998, he began a port of Linux to the IBM zSeries, and he's shepherded the Linux mainframe project from the beginning to the first shipments. In porting Linux to an IBM mainframe, Betzler went against the grain both internally at IBM, where many saw Linux as a competitor to IBM's own mainframe operating system, and among many analysts outside of IBM, who suggested the port wasn't possible without a huge investment. Betzler's "fun" project has helped IBM record double-digit revenue growth for the first time in more than a decade You are not talking out of your usual orifice it seems, or perhaps you are. Was: Error in Marist large filesystem: Library symlinks Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2000 23:20:24 -0600 From: Raymond Moyers <rmoyers(a)nop.org> To: Linux on VM Port <LINUX-VM(a)VM.MARIST.EDU> Hmm seems ive deleted some of my older posts grr, o well they have a list archive too, and im in it, been on that list from near day one ... i dont seem to recall you there either. You are not talking out of your usual orifice it seems, or perhaps you are. you sound as if you had been locked in a glass house with an old 360/67 for 20 years and suddenly came out and spent the last day or so cramming for your last post. Common man, it isnt my aim to get in no pecker fight here, its just the exchange of experience projects and ideas, so why go to an extent of putting your integrity in question. bad move imo. > -- Linux is *not* the best thing to happen to mainframes. IBM sales sure says otherwise, it has reversed a downward trend in sales in market conditions where the field elsewhere is not climbing. IBM gives direct credit to Linux on the 390 for this. > I know the capabilities of the hardware, I know the capabilities of the > OS, and I know that the OS is not the best choice for the hardware > in most cases). Unix given a persona, being more GP than anything before seen on earth, would not claim to be "best" at anything. it would claim provably beyond all doubt, running on devices from wristwatch ( demoed by IBM ) to the mainframe, that it is good at more things than any other system can claim. Linux on the s390 bare metal would sure be incomplete, it dont have all the support from all the user written tools dealing with the specifics of that hardware, it still really needs VM under it to fill in it functional gaps. Thats the argument you could have made, so why am i the one making it. ( i dont see that condition existing forever tho, VM was no utilitarian cornacopia on the hacked 360/40 it was born on either, even VM370r6 cant run XEDIT because the full screen support is missing, but hey, VM got better and so will linux390) This last post from you was in the flavor that it seems you think i was attacking you or something, relax man, that isnt the case. Leftist moonies always translate disagreement with them into personal attacks, they call you racist, or go into their shout you down mode or .. Is that what this is ? Raymond -------------------------------------------------------

24 years, 2 months

1
0
0 0

CP/M-86

by dquebbeman＠acm.org

> I've been playing around with cp/m-86, and was wondering if anyone knew if > a multiuser (like MP/M) version was available somewhere? My next step is > to try making it work under Dosemu on Linux if I cant... Yes, it's called MP/M-86: http://www.retroarchive.org/cpm/os/MPM86-21I.ZIP or http://www.retroarchive.org/cpm/os/MPM86-21E.ZIP hth, -dq

24 years, 2 months

2
3
0 0

Serendipity

by r.stek＠snet.net

Doug - You asked about Lee Felsenstein turning the intelligent terminal into a computer. From an article he wrote in 1977, (found on Jim Battle's Sol site) he stated that they were requested to design an inteligent terminal for Popular Electronics. He had already designed the VDM board and wanted to use it for his so-called Tom Swift terminal. He and Bob Marsh worked out designs and Bob's used an 8080 whereas his did not. They eventually realized that they had a whole computer, but downplayed that until after the article was published. Bob Stek Saver of Lost Sols

24 years, 2 months

1
0
0 0

FW: Free chips to good home (gone!)

by jcwren＠jcwren.com

Thanks to everyone who showed interest (which was a lot more than I expected). The chips have found new homes, and will be winging their way their Monday. Based on the replies, I guess I should have put them on eBay with "L@@K!" "RARE!", and made my retirement money. This is actually something that really gets me wound up. These people gut an old XT, and list every chip they can yank off the board as "RARE!". So it has gold flashed pins. So what? It's ceramic? So what? A 27C128 is not "L@@K RARE!". And there are a couple of particular offenders. I've though about writing a CGI script that trolls for that, and automatically sends an e-mail every day to the effect of "Hi! You're an idiot, and couldn't recognize a RARE! chip if it bit you on the ass. Please stop polluting eBay with your useless crap that you can't even identify. How can I tell? Because you put RARE! and a part number, and no part description what so ever. Moron". --John > I've got some chips sitting around that may (or may not) interest the > classiccmp'ers. > > 2 MC68010LC10 (10Mhz "aircraft carrier" (DIP-64) 68010s) > 1 MC68010R10 (10Mhz PGA 68010) > 4 AT&T DSP-16a > 2 Acorn chip sets (VL86C010 + VL86C410 + VL86C110) > 1 AMD 9511D (DIP Arithimetic Co-processor) > 4 COM9046 (SMC voice scramblers)

24 years, 2 months

2
1
0 0

(crystals) Re: R.I.P. for D.I.Y.

by ajp166＠bellatlantic.net

From: John Allain <allain(a)panix.com> >Could someone point out a catalog/website that gives good complete >solutions? (IE the crystal needs some support components which I have >no clue). Apparently two crystals of equal spec from different >manufacturers will require diff. support, so... help. thanks. The most direct place to go is the PIC chip vendor. They will specify the crystal and related componenets. Allison

24 years, 2 months

1
0
0 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

test-drb