I'm not sure if this is 10 years old or not, but given that it's not an
Intel based system, I'm sure I can slide it by.
My roommate just aquired an HP 715/64 but no keyboard. It doesn't take
the standard HP keyboard but instead has a 10-pin connector (looks like a
10/100Base-T connector, but has 10 pins) and from searching, it looks like
it requires a special keyboard adaptor to use an HP or PC keyboard. Anybody
know anything about these? Where he could get one? Maybe make one?
-spc (Thanks)
> If you want to be bold, use the Intel compiler. It is freely distributed
> for Linux systems and as a 30 day evaluation for Windows. SIMH really
> buzzes when compiled with it.
>
> -- hbp
Have you tried this with more than just the VAX version of SIMH? I'm
wondering how much of an improvement I'd see with the PDP-11 version of
SIMH, and KLH10 (KLH's PDP-10 emulator).
Does the compiler put any kind of a time limit on how long you can run the
executables that you generate?
Zane
I need some help. Jay West has kindly posted the file
"rt11freewarev2.iso.gz" at:
http://www.classiccmp.org/PDP-11/RT-11/freeware-CDS/images/
"rt11freewarev2.iso.gz" is about 171 Mbytes in size. It is my
understanding that
the full size file "rt11freewarev2.iso" is exactly 671,088,640 bytes in
size which
is the CD for the RT11 Freeware CD produced by Tim Shoppa. However,
when
the download of the "rt11freewarev2.iso.gz" file is complete, I end up
with a file
that is 687,282,673 bytes which is different in size and can NOT be
identical to
the full size (and correct - Tim Shoppa used to have the full size image
at his
site and I downloaded it before it was changed to a ".bz2" image) image
of the
actual CD.
I am using Windows 98 SE/Netscape 4.78 and the normal WinZip in case
that
is part of the problem. Jay has told me:
"I spent about 6 hours this morning redownloading (from Tim's site) all
3
freeware cd's, uncompressing them, recalculating MD5 hashes, and
rezipping
them. The files I just downloaded compare identically with the files on
Tim's site, AND those files compare identically to the files I have had
on
my server for the past few weeks that you already downloaded. I even
downloaded those files from my server to my windows pc across the net
like
everyone else would, and they uncompress and compare identially to the
ones
on Tim's site. The files on my server have been completely correct since
day
1. I don't know what happened on your end when you downloaded the files,
but
I can assure you what is (and has been) on my site is a correct
identical
copy of Tim's."
I am confident that Jay is correct and that there is something I don't
understand
with what takes place when I do my download. Can anyone suggest to me
what
I am doing wrong? PLEASE!!
Sincerely yours,
Jeremy Fine
--
If you attempted to send a reply and the original e-mail
address has been discontinued due a high volume of junk
e-mail, then the semi-permanent e-mail address can be
obtained by replacing the four characters preceding the
'at' with the four digits of the current year.
At 10:30 AM 6/14/02 -0400, you wrote:
> F.Y.I. - My Cabletron MRXI hubs have RJ-45 sockets, for hooking up
>to a serial VT420 terminal... :)
> But, yes, I agree. Those hubs are the only time _I've_ seen RJ-45
>used for serial communication.
Many terminal servers use RJ45 for serial
In a message dated 6/14/02 4:54:07 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
eric(a)brouhaha.com writes:
> AFAIK, the last customer release of CDS-432 was release 2.7, which
> supported the release 3.2 chips. Intel continued development in house
> in support of the Intel/Siemens joint venture (later commercially named
> "BiiN"). There were release 3.3 chips, and probably software to support
> them, but they were not available to customers.
>
> I have not been able to obtain a complete copy of any release of
> CDS-432 or iMAX-432, nor I have found the diagnostics or DEBUG-432.
> I keep hoping that copies of this stuff will turn up eventually, but
> things look pretty grim...
>
>
Grim is right. Intel was extremely dedicated to destroying SW. When we were
buying from them in that time period we never got any SW. Saw large bins of
Intel disks on their way to destruction. Sad.
I have the pinboard tester for the Biin CPU card. It came out surplus in a
later lot we did not have to certify destruction on. I have full docs on it
too. It is a classic museum piece, and I bet nearly the only piece of Biin
left.
I will try to get pictures up within the next few weeks. It is buried in
storage.
Paxton
Astoria, OR
All this mention of Motorola's 88000 RISC chip has made me wonder
what machines were built around it. Did Data General make anything
with it? Was there a Motorola development system?
One of my collecting goals is to acquire an example of each of
the microprocessor acrhitectures. Now 6502, 8080, 6809, 68000,
and so on are easy. What about the Z8000? The 32032 (I do have
a Whitechapel)? The 88000? The iAPX432?
--
John Honniball
coredump(a)gifford.co.uk
> From: Jim Arnott
>
> Thanks.
>
> Never seen Serial RJ-45 ports before
>
> Jim
>
F.Y.I. - My Cabletron MRXI hubs have RJ-45 sockets, for hooking up
to a serial VT420 terminal... :)
But, yes, I agree. Those hubs are the only time _I've_ seen RJ-45
used for serial communication.
--
--- David A Woyciesjes
--- C & IS Support Specialist
--- Yale University Press
--- (203) 432-0953
--- ICQ # - 905818
Mac OS X 10.1 - Darwin Kernel Version 5
Running since 01/22/2002 without a crash
>Perhaps it was a part of the OS install on later MacOS versions?
Most of the optional items were wrapped into the mail installer starting
with OS 8, so I was probably thinking of that rather than 7.5.5 when I
said to check the custom install.
>Now, a new problem. When I try and run the 7.5.5 upgrade, it starts to
>install (with the progress meter), and then says that it can't be
>installed and aborts. I downloaded it from the Apple 'Older Software
>Downloads' page on apple's site, and the Disk Copy images
>checksum-verify ok.
Um... does it give you any kind of a reason why it can't install? (any
kind of error message?). I don't notice anything that jumps out in
Apple's TIL about it, but you might try restarting with extensions off,
and then run the updater (restart holding down SHIFT until you get the
Welcome To Mac screen)
It has been a LONG time since I tried to do a 7.5.3 install and then a .5
update. I have a 7.5.5 Installer CD that I have been using since I got
it, and that does the 7.5.3 install, followed directly by the .5 update,
so it never seems to have problems. (and I never stop at .3, as .3 was
pretty buggy, with .5 fixing much of the problems).
It is possible that the Text To Speech installed something that the .5
updater can't get past. Is it possible for you to start over and do the
7.5.3 followed by .5 before installing anything else?
Worst case, I can dub you that 7.5.5 install CD and mail it down to you.
Now that 7.5.5 is available on Apple's site for free, I don't think there
would be any legal issues with me doing that (or at least not ones that
Apple would care about persuing).
-chris
<http://www.mythtech.net>
>
> > Bob Supniks excellent emulator (VAX along with many PDPs
>
> Is this what happened to Charon-VAX... someone else
> perfected the commodity so the also-rans gave up?
> I had heard that C-V never got up much steam.
>
> John A.
CHARON-VAX is still around http://www.softresint.com/charon-vax/index.htm
however, unlike Bob's emulators, it's a commercial product. The Hobbyist
version of CHARON-VAX has about the same features as SIMH (I think SIMH
supports more devices). However, the commercial version of CHARON-VAX is
currently the best product[1], unfortunatly, it costs FAR more than an
equivalent VAX!
Zane
[1] Only the commercial versions of CHARON-VAX have ethernet support.
>> Yes, it can talk. Actually, the 128k Mac can talk with the right version
>> of MacInTalk (anyone remember the Talking Moose).
>
>Neat.
I think the first real use of MacInTalk I ever saw (beyond Talking Moose,
which was the first place I saw it at all, but I considered that a "show
off the technology" app) was in the game Captain Magneto (which I never
did solve, anyone know how to get the laser gun out of the room on the
island?)
>I did a custom install, but don't remember seeing it. Where is it/can I
>download a copy to install from Apple's downloads site or something?
It might have been an optional installer rather than being part of the
main OS installer as a custom item. If you have a 7.5 CD, check some of
the optional items on it. I would check my 7.5.5 CD, but I forgot it at
home (and didn't bother checking last night like I should have)
It should be listed as Text-To-Speech or PlainTalk, or you can download
the PlainTalk 1.5 installers from Apple's web site. That includes the
Text-To-Speech installer.
You want to install MacInTalk 2 (there are 3 versions, 2, 3, and Pro. 2
is the one that will probably work best on a Classic II, but 3 might also
work, you can try it. Pro is for 040's or PPCs)
You can find a list of the older Apple software at:
<http://www.info.apple.com/support/oldersoftwarelist.html>
Click the link for System Software Downloads (or just scroll down about
2/3's of the page). Then in that list, scroll to the bottom of it. You
will find a little ways up from the bottom of the list is
"Macintosh/System/Speech/PlainTalk_1.5", the list is alphabetical. You
will want the 5 "English_TTS" disks (unless you want to hear your Mac
talk in spanish, in which case get the 3 "Mexican_TTS" disks as well.
-chris
<http://www.mythtech.net>
At 07:22 AM 6/14/02 -0700, you wrote:
> You probably mean a DECStation 2100 or 3100. Those are both R2000
>based, only difference between 2100 and 3100 is that the 2100 runs at 12 MHZ
>and the 3100 at 16. NetBSD supports them quite well. Probably the fastest
>small workstation at the time they came out (1989). They look like, and use
>the same (or very similar) case, power supply, peripherals, as VS3100/30/38.
Of course, silly me. I meant the 2100.
carlos.
--------------------------------------------------------------
Carlos E. Murillo-Sanchez carlos_murillo(a)nospammers.ieee.org
Here's a new technology with a classic twist:
http://www.bayarea.com/mld/mercurynews/business/3444884.htm
IBM invented a medium based in part on scanning electronic microscope
technology that creates tiny indentations or holes on a polymer. Each
whole is "half a billionth of an inch" in diameter. The storage density
is purported to be 25 times that of current hard disk technology (200 CD
ROMs on a stamp). This is amazing. The technology is being compared to
punch cards.
Check out the article above soon as the full-text goes away after a day or
so.
I see this as one of the most significant inventions of the modern (i.e. <
10 years) computer age because it represents a high-density, long term
storage media that can be reliably used for non-volatile archival data
storage.
And based on mechanical technology. Who woulda thunk?
Sellam Ismail Vintage Computer Festival
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
International Man of Intrigue and Danger http://www.vintage.org
* Old computing resources for business and academia at www.VintageTech.com *
Richard Erlacher wrote on june 13, 1988:
>
> That's particulary so when one considers that most S-100 hardware was really
> not Imsai-comaptible due to timing problems.
Talking about timing, you email was sent 14 years ago ;-)
erf.
I've done just about everything I can think of to mount TK50 tapes on my
MicroVax (and also on my TK70 on the 4000), and I keep getting the
"%MOUNT-I_OPRQST, Please mount device" error.
I've tried mounting the tapes with "/FOREIGN" as well - no luck.
If I try mounting the tapes with the "/NOASSIST" option - I get the
"%MOUNT-F-VOLINV, volume is not software enabled" error.
I'm running VMS 6.1.
Any ideas? I've tried a half-dozen tapes on both drives with no luck. In
fact, there is no tape drive activity at all when the mount command is
given. I have been trying to "allocate" the drives beforehand, with no luck
in mounting.
AGH! Am I doing something dumb? I've been searching the 'NET and "Googling"
this problem to death - but I've been following all of the examples.
Any ideas?
Thanks!
- Matt
Matthew Sell
Programmer
On Time Support, Inc.
www.ontimesupport.com
(281) 296-6066
Join the Metrology Software discussion group METLIST!
http://www.ontimesupport.com/subscribe_t&c.html.
"One World, One Web, One Program" - Microsoft Promotional Ad
"Ein Volk, Ein Reich, Ein Fuhrer" - Adolf Hitler
Many thanks for this tagline to a fellow RGVAC'er...
I used to work at a law office that had an AT&T Starserver. It had two
"concentrators" that each could attach to two 12 port (IIRC) serial "hubs".
The serial lines went to terminals and printers, and used RJ-45's with TP
wiring.
Bob
-----Original Message-----
From: David Woyciesjes [mailto:DAW@yalepress3.unipress.yale.edu]
Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 9:30 AM
To: 'cctalk(a)classiccmp.org'
Subject: RE: Network card for LaserJet
> From: Jim Arnott
>
> Thanks.
>
> Never seen Serial RJ-45 ports before
>
> Jim
>
F.Y.I. - My Cabletron MRXI hubs have RJ-45 sockets, for hooking up
to a serial VT420 terminal... :)
But, yes, I agree. Those hubs are the only time _I've_ seen RJ-45
used for serial communication.
--
--- David A Woyciesjes
--- C & IS Support Specialist
--- Yale University Press
--- (203) 432-0953
--- ICQ # - 905818
Mac OS X 10.1 - Darwin Kernel Version 5
Running since 01/22/2002 without a crash
>I've done just about everything I can think of to mount TK50 tapes on my MicroVax (and also
>on my TK70 on the 4000), and I keep getting the "%MOUNT-I_OPRQST, Please mount
>device" error.
> >
> >If I try mounting the tapes with the "/NOASSIST" option - I get the "%MOUNT-F-VOLINV,
>volume is not software enabled" error.
>
/NOASSIST is what you want. Otherwise it is asking an
operator (human being) to go off and put the tape in
the appropriate device and let the system know
when it is in there. You could have done this and
then issued the appropriate REPLY command,
but on the whole /NOASSIST is much easier.
>
> I get VOLINV when (from memory) either the tape
is not in properly (are the appropriate lights lit?)
or I have an unlabelled, unitialised tape.
Try
$MOUNT/FOREIGN/NOASSIST device:
and see what it thinks the volume label is.
If you have a scratch tape, you could try:
$ INIT device: MY_LABEL
$ MOUNT/NOASSIST device: MY_LABEL
and see what happens.
Make sure it really is a scratch tape though, otherwise
the data that was on it will be permanently lost.
Antonio
> Today, I noticed a link on Slashdot about the IMSAI
> Series Two at www.imsai.net. Shipping in July. It
> LOOKS real, but there are mostly drawings and not
> pictures. Uses a Z80 successor CPU. Switching power
> supply, though. $995. Still the beautiful front panel
> that was as good as most mini's. Frankly, I find this
> price hard to believe - too low, given the super
> quality of the original machine and the volume this
> might be made in.
I was looking at the site myself earlier. Most of the cost looks to be from
the front panel, and aparently that $995 gets you a pretty bare bones
system. I think the disk controller and stuff is extra.
Any idea how legit they are? I'm tempted to order the metal piece I needfor
the front so I can convert my rack mount case to a tabletop.
> Does even discussing this violate the 10 year rule?
Not if the "so cool it's already classic" rule is still in effect :^) Sort
of like a BeBox is more or less ontopic or NeXT HW was a few years ago :^)
Zane
>I was wondering... it it capable of 'talking' since it has a 68030 and
>built-in speaker? I just installed MacOS 7.5.3 onto it and haven't seen
>anything related to speech, and the 'Speak' options in SimpleText are
>greyed out. Is there something else I need to do to get it to work? [Yes,
>I'm going to update to MacOS 7.5.5.]
Yes, it can talk. Actually, the 128k Mac can talk with the right version
of MacInTalk (anyone remember the Talking Moose).
You need to make sure MacInTalk is installed. I don't think it was a
default part of 7.5, so you may have to do a custom install to get it.
If MacInTalk is installed, and you still can't talk, let me know, I'll
throw 7.5 on a Classic II and see what's up.
-chris
<http://www.mythtech.net>
> On this particular desk, for the benefit of the clients (to keep them
>occupied and out of the mixer's hair) was a Mac SE running (among other
>amusements) a copy of MacPlaymate, and early soft-core 'porn' game. One
>of it's attributes was, that as long as the program was launched, it would
>grab the speaker and purr lascivious nothings at random intervals.
My copy doesn't make noise :-(
I guess maybe I'm just not treating her right.
Although this does remind me of one of the MANY occasions I got in
trouble in high school. I was in a "Computer Music" class, and we were
using Mac SEs. Since my lab partner and I were way ahead of the rest of
the class (he was a die hard musician, and I knew the Mac and MIDI like
the back of my hand), I brought my MacRecorder into class, we hooked it
up, and started recording our own samples for our compositions.
Well, one of them "accidentally" got left as the alert sound on the Mac.
It was a nice clear mix of my partner and my voices going "PENIS....
Wheeeee" (hey, I was in High School, immaturity was in)
The Band instructor was in that afternoon trying to use a Mac to write a
letter of recommendation for a student... whose parents were there with
them. Since he knew almost nothing about computers, he was making quite a
few mistakes... with each one getting a solid "PENIS... Wheee" sound.
Needless to say, when we showed up for class the next day, we just about
had our heads bit off by the Band instructor... and it was all we could
do from laughing our asses off at him as he was relaying the events to us
in that ever so parental "I'm very pissed off" tone.
-chris
<http://www.mythtech.net>
I was wondering... it it capable of 'talking' since it has a 68030 and
built-in speaker? I just installed MacOS 7.5.3 onto it and haven't seen
anything related to speech, and the 'Speak' options in SimpleText are
greyed out. Is there something else I need to do to get it to work? [Yes,
I'm going to update to MacOS 7.5.5.]
Thanks
-- Pat
I had a 12-in-1 RS kit, but that was back (ca. 1960) when you had to
_solder_ the connections (and unsolder them to change from one project to
another). It also used 120V, one tube, and no transisters. Great fun,
though.
-----Original Message-----
From: Jim Arnott [mailto:jrasite@eoni.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 11:11 PM
To: cctalk(a)classiccmp.org
Subject: Re: I hate Radio Shack
Carlos,
FWIW, that kit is still in production and is used in the local jr.
college's Intro to Electricity course.
Jim
Carlos Murillo wrote:
> But, going back to the original topic, as much as I also hate RS,
> I have fond, lasting memories of my "150 in 1" electronic projects
> kit. It was the best present that an uncle [1] could give to a 12 year
> old.
>
Oops, Michigan even... *sigh*.. this has not been my day.
Will J
_________________________________________________________________
MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos:
http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx
Aren't TA91s DEC versions of one of those freakish IBM 36-track tape
cartridge drives? Damn me, for not living near Ohio.
Will J
_________________________________________________________________
Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bob Lafleur [mailto:bob_lafleur@technologist.com]
> Has anyone successfully used non-DEC SCSI tape (cartridge) drives with
> VMS? If so, what types have you been successful with? Travan?
> DAT? 8mm?
> Which models?
Used an HP DDS drive. No problem, but I don't remember the model.
I know of an Exabyte "Eliant something-or-other" D8 drive that was
used on a VMS system.
Chris
Christopher Smith, Perl Developer
Amdocs - Champaign, IL
"Confutatis maledictus, flammis acribus addictus, voca me cum
benedictis. Oro supplex et acclinis, cor contritunt quasi
cinis, gere curarn mei finis." -Requiem