I am hoping someone here knows Richard Cornwell, driving force behind
KL10B SimH and associated forks.
Not sure how to raise the issue of simulated RP07 drives size not
matching RPO7 and looking like RPO6.
Also trying to figure out how to set switches as in other KA/KL sims.
I can't seem to find a means of doing that in RC's KL.
Is there a usage template? I have found the docs that describe it and
tte config but the questions above are not evident in my reading, does
not mean the data is not there, just I have not found the clue path.
thanks for any help or pointers!
bad bob
I found files for my favorite DOS editor on an archive from my OS/2
machine, which replaced my DOS machine in about 1990.
The editor was ETOOL, from Amerisoft.
If anybody wants the files, I'm happy to send them.
-rw-r--r-- 1 vsnyder staff 245248 Mar 8 1988 e/dos/etool.exe
-rw-r--r-- 1 vsnyder staff 1024 Mar 8 1988 e/dos/etool.fig
-rw-r--r-- 1 vsnyder staff 83968 Jul 9 1985 e/dos/etool.hlp
I lost the manual decades ago.
Van Snyder
van.snyder at sbcglobal.net
Recently Al Kossow made available a zip file containing a Micro/PDP-11
installation kit for Unix V7M-11 V1.0 on bitsavers as RX50 disk images.
Tinkering away here in Covid lockdown, I've managed to get this running
under SIMH pdp11 emulating an almost historically accurate PDP-11/23 plus.
I've placed the SIMH initialisation file, a couple of RD51 disk images and
an "installation recipe" for making these disks on GitHub at -
https://github.com/agn453/V7M-11
While I mainly had exposure to later versions of Unix and Ultrix-11 on
a PDP-11/70 as an undergraduate - this one surely brings back memories!
Tony
--
Tony Nicholson <tony.nicholson at computer.org>
I use both Realterm and Tera Term.
Realterm does not emulate terminals - but is able to display ALL the ASCII
characters including the Control Characters and even 8-bit characters.
This has been invaluable to me working with my late 1970's Tektronix 4052
and 4054A computers, which made heavy use of ten of the ASCII control
characters for quick formatting of BASIC PRINT commands without requiring
multiple PRINT commands. Realterm also can capture the entire stream of
ASCII characters to a file - which is invaluable in capturing all the
characters from DC300 Tektronix program tape cartridges. I use the
XON/XOFF feature with both my 4052 and 4054A to send and receive ASCII
programs to the Tektronix computers at 9600 baud.
Here is an example output of Realterm with printed control characters - as
I am debugging my Arduino program to emulate the Tektronix 4924 GPIB tape
drive:
https://www.eevblog.com/forum/projects/tektronix-4924-tape-drive-emulator/m…
I also use Tera Term - as it is able to emulate Tektronix graphics
terminals, both the 4012/4014 vector graphics AND the 'newer' 4100 series
color graphics terminals! My Tektronix 4041 GPIB controller computers
(68000 based) had only a single line LED display, but supported Tektronix
4012/4014 if you had the optional Graphics ROM. I was able to port several
of my 4050 graphics games to 4041 BASIC (Artillery, Lunar Lander, and my
port of Adventure) using Tera Term on my Windows 10 PC as the terminal to
display the graphics/text and for data input. I also recovered the 4041
EZ-TEST (GPIB interactive program development) tapes, which only supported
the 4100 color terminals - and used Tera Term successfully to emulate those
color terminals. Tera Term also supports XON/XOFF and file
capture/restore, so I have been able to use it with my 4041 computer to
replace the internal DC100 tape drive and load and restore programs from my
Windows 10 PC.
See example Tera Term vector graphics screenshots and color terminal
screenshots in my 4041 thread on vcfed.org:
https://www.vcfed.org/forum/forum/genres/other/76507-tektronix-4041-compute…
Monty
> Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2021 19:57:19 -0700
> From: Curious Marc <curiousmarc3 at gmail.com>
> To: lee_courtney at acm.org, Lee Courtney <leec2124 at gmail.com>, "General
> Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts" <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
> Subject: Re: Terminal Emulator
> Message-ID: <50E6AD1D-F0D5-42CB-93A8-163B9945BB48 at gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
>
> I use Teraterm too. Works both on Windoze and Mac. I like the ability to
> run scripts.
> Marc
>
> > On Sep 30, 2021, at 5:51 PM, Lee Courtney via cctalk <
> cctalk at classiccmp.org> wrote:
> >
> > ?We use Teraterm at work - adequate, free, open-source(if that's
> important),
> > meets our needs for embedded development across a wide variety of
> > platforms.
> >
> > YMMV,
> >
> > Lee Courtney
> >
> >> On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 11:57 AM Mike Katz via cctalk <
> cctalk at classiccmp.org>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> I am looking for a good terminal emulator. Not for connecting to older
> >> computers serially but to connect with my embedded designs.
> >> Do any of you have any recommendations.
> >>
> >> I've been using Realterm for years but it's not very good.
> >>
> >> I used UCON, hyper term, terra term, telix (going way back) and a few I
> >> can't remember the name of.
> >>
> >> Here are my needs:
> >>
> >> 1. Runs under Windows 10 (linux optionally)
> >> 2. Has user selectable baud rates (I use 500K baud frequently)
> >> 3. Can use any Windows Com Port.
> >> 4. Can send files as raw binary
> >> 5. Has X-modem built in (nice but optional)
> >> 6. Has some kind of basic VT-100 support
> >> 7. Can display both ascii characters and binary data has hex numbers,
> >> preferably on alternate lines (hex above the ascii character like this:
> >> 45 76 65 72 79
> >> E V E R Y
> >> 8. Can send short manually entered strings in hex or ascii.
> >> 9. Can recognize protocols (based on start and/or end of text
> characters)
> >> 10. Costs less than $100
> >> 11. Can Capture what comes in the port
> >> 12. Has local echo (when connected to systems that don't echo what you
> >> type)
> >> 13. Has a large scroll back buffer.
> >> 14. Has programmable macro buttons or function keys.
> >> 15. Can handle removal and insertion of the TTL to Serial USB converter
> >> without crashing.
> >>
> >> Thank you
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> > --
> > Lee Courtney
> > +1-650-704-3934 cell
>
I'm trying to list out the document scans I have and work out which are
already on bitsavers and which are not (and, indeed, a fair few of these
are originally from bitsavers anyway). This is probably several thousand
files total, so searching manx by hand is not an option!
I see that manx lists the MD5 checksum for many files, at least it does
for those from bitsavers. Is there a publicly available list of URL and
MD5 checksum? This would make it relatively easy for me to cross check
my files against the list and whittle down to a subset that I should
make available.
Alternatively, is the current manx database available anywhere? I know
the code is on github, but I didn't see the data there. (I do have an
SQL dump from 2010 when manx changed hands, but that's not recent enough
to save much).
I could try to do some parsing of bitsavers-filename => DEC-part-number
and eliminate files that way, but that seems inexact at best. Or I could
just download the DEC subset of files (spread across the mirrors) but
that seems a bit antisocial.
Antonio
--
Antonio Carlini
antonio at acarlini.com
Hi, All,
I'm fiddling with my 11/725 and as part of that, I'm prepping possible
system images to deploy using the 10-year-old 11/730 emulator that's
now part of SIMH. I'm trying to get the original (v3.8) version
working because of the numerous changes to how simh 4.0 works now.
I'm working from the sources on http://www.9track.net/simh/vax730/
They compiled just fine and the binary runs (on Linux, FWIW) but I've
tried booting several different TU58 images and VMS device images and
so far, they all tell me "file open error".
Here's the current config with me trying to run the CRD tape/disk
combo (trimmed just show mounted images on TD0 and RB1).
sim> show conf
VAX730 simulator configuration
CPU, idle disabled, 2048KB, HALT to SIMH
.
.
.
TD, 2 units
TD0, 262KB, attached to BE-T176I-DE.tu58, write enabled
TD1, 262KB, not attached, write enabled
.
.
.
RB, address=FFFB86-FFFB87, vector=2A8, 4 units
RB0, 64MW, not attached, write enabled, RB80
RB1, 5242KW, attached to CRDPACK-RL02.img, write enabled, RB02
RB2, 5242KW, not attached, write enabled, RB02
RB3, 5242KW, not attached, write enabled, RB02
If I have to, I can grab the source for the current version off of
github, but having looked it over, it's essentially this same emulator
(with commit dates of 9-10 years ago) plus some recent structural
cleanup that's similar across all emulators. The functional parts are
this same emulator.
Thanks for any tips.
-ethan
I?ve got a DEC 3000/300 system that has some SCSI drives with aging bearings installed. I?d like to be able to start to migrate some of my systems, like this, to flash media, of some kind, as even my large repository of SCSI disks is starting to dry up.
Here is my SRM level info:
DEC 3000 - M300
Digital Equipment Corporation
VPP PAL V5.56-80800101/OSF PAL V1.45-80800201 - Built on 30-SEP-1996 09:18:31.84
As far as I have read, the SCSI2SD v6 2020 should be compatible with several varieties of DEC hardware, from the VAXen to the Alphas. However, I can?t seem to get anywhere useful with mine. I have the virtual disks configured as follows:
>>> sh dev
BOOTDEV ADDR DEVTYPE NUMBYTES RM/FX WP DEVNAM REV
------- ---- ------- -------- ----- -- ------ ---
ESA0 08-00-2B-3F-4C-9A , TENBT
DKA100 A/1/0 DISK 9.54GB FX RZ40 6.0
DKA300 A/3/0 DISK 9.54GB FX RZ40 6.0
DKA400 A/4/0 RODISK 305.01MB RM WP RRD45 6.0
All three disks are from the SCSI2SD. I have attempted to make the inquiry strings match the originals, as closely as possible. In the SCSI2SD utility, I have the following config:
General page: all defaults, termination off (I have tried parity, scsi2 mode, and setting SCSI speed to sync, with no improvement)
Device 1: enabled, ID 1, device Hard Drive, start sector 0, sector size 512, sector count 18636800, vendor ?DEC ", product ?RZ40 ?, revision ? 6.0?, serial number <random string>
Device 2: enabled, ID 3, device Hard Drive, start sector 18636800, sector size 512, sector count 18636800, vendor ?DEC ", product ?RZ40 ?, revision ? 6.0?, serial number <random string + 1>
Device 3: enabled, ID 4, device CDROM, start sector 37273600, sector size 2048, sector count 148933, vendor ?DEC ", product ?RRD45 ?, revision ? 6.0?, serial number <random string + 2>
I?ve also tried booting from a virtual CDROM, only, with no luck there, either. In all cases, I get the following from SRM:
>>> test scsi
T-STS-SCSI A - Data Trans test
? T-ERR-SCSI A - Data Trans test - nondma/sync inq size miscompare
T-ERR-SCSI A - id = 1 lun = 0
? T-ERR-SCSI A - Data Trans test - nondma/sync inq size miscompare
T-ERR-SCSI A - id = 3 lun = 0
? T-ERR-SCSI A - Data Trans test - nondma/sync inq size miscompare
T-ERR-SCSI A - id = 4 lun = 0
?? 002 SCSI 0x0008
84 FAIL
Does anyone have an idea what might be causing this? Has anyone tried a v6 SCSI2SD in a DEC 3000?
Thanks!
- Alex
Hey all --
I have a TC08 DECtape controller that I'd like to convert to a TC08N (the
negibus version of the TC08). If I'm reading the documentation right, this
involves swapping in a few flip chips -- M100 for the installed M101, M102
for M103, and M633 for M623.
If anyone has any of these, please drop me a line. Curious also if anyone
out there has done this conversion and can comment on whether my assessment
is correct...
Thanks!
- Josh
Got a small batch (8) of Victor 9000 floppies, MSDOS ca. 1985. I
really don't want to write a decoder for such a small batch--I've got
other things on the burner right now. Anyone want to take a crack at
transferring the data? (Funds available).
--Chuck
I've been restoring a PDP-11/05 recently and after replacing several
faulty ICs I have it mostly working. I've run into a bit of a problem
whilst running MAINDEC-11-D0NB (T14 TRAP TEST) though.
The failing instruction sequence is:
7200:?? MOV #6340,R0
7204:?? MOV R0,(R0)+
7206:?? CMP 6340,#6342
7214:?? BEQ 7220
7216:?? HALT
This halts at 7216 with:
? R0 = 6342
? 6340 = 6340
I tried this same set of instructions on a PDP-11/84 and also on Simh
and the result is:
? R0 = 6342
? 6340 = 6342
which is what the diagnostic seems to expect.
I've carefully looked through the PDP-11/05 microprogram listing but I'm
having difficulty seeing where this is going wrong. Here is a brief
extract of the microprogram in the context of the MOV R0,(R0)+
instruction along with my interpretation of what I think is going on:
LOC? NXT? * SOURCE MODE 0 (REGISTER), GET SOURCE DATA
201? 007? S0-1? B=R[S]; BUT BYTE
007? 001? S0-2? R[10]=B; BUT DESTINATION
????????? / IF IR<5:3> = 2 GOTO D2-1
? B = R0 = 6340??? // B = source register
? R10 = B = 6340?? // Source data stored in sratch pad register R10
LOC? NXT? * DEST MODE 2 (AUTO-INC) GET DEST DATA, OP AND REPLACE
105? 331? D2-1? BA=R[D]; DATAIP; ALBYT
331? 341? D2-2? B=R[D]+1+BYTE.BAR
341? 200? D2-3? R[D]=B; BUT JSRMP; GOTO D1-2; CKOFF
????????? / IF INST NOT JMP OR JSR FALL THROUGH TO D1-2
? BA = R0 = 6340??? // Bus address = destination register
? B = R0 + 2 = 6342 // Auto-increment and store in B
? R0 = B = 6342???? // Update destination register
LOC? NXT? * DEST MODE 1 (REG,DEFERRED) GET DEST DATA, OP AND REPLACE
200? 210? D1-2? B=UNIBUS DATA; BUT BYTE
210? 143? D1-3? R[11]=B; BUT UNARY
163? 334? D1-4? B=R[10] OP B; BUT NOMOD
334? 065? D1-5? DATO; ALBYT; CKOFF
065? 305? D1-5? DRIVERS=B; GOTO S2-2 (BUT SERVICE)
? B = (6340) = 0??? // B = value at location pointed to by bus address
? R11 = B = 0?????? // R11 is only used for unary instructions
? B = R10 = 6340??? // B = source data stored previously in R10
? (6340) = B = 6340 // B is written to the address pointed to by bus address
Where have I gone wrong with this? I can't see from the above how the
value at 6340 can possibly be 6342
Matt
Hey all,
According to
http://bitsavers.trailing-edge.com/pdf/hp/9000_200/9000-200_periphSupp_Dec8…
(see PDF page 2), it seems as if HP-UX 5.1 should work on the 9000/217.
http://hparchive.com/Catalogs/HP-Catalog-1986.pdf also seems to confirm
this (PDF page 71 under Series 200 Bundled Systems, it's mentioned that
the Model 217 can run single-user HP-UX). However, there seems to be
conflicted information based on people that I've talked to and the
hpmuseum page with a copy of HP-UX 5.1 whether it should work at all,
whether 5.1 is a unified release where the boot floppy should work on
both series 200 and 300, or whether there's another boot floppy for
series 200 which apparently has not been archived.
I recently obtained a Model 217 and would like to know if anyone has
more info on this, the two people that I know of that have tried it get
a hang on boot.
Thanks,
Larkin
Nostalgia is great for aging baby-boomers as me. Back in 1978 I along
with a friend bought a Heathkit H1 and spent many leisure hours
constructing it and getting it to boot up! By 1984 I moved on to the Coleco
ADAM and learned BASIC(Well more accurately APPLE Basic) spending too much
time on it rather than on my PhD studies. Trying to write my dissertation
using Writer was a challenge as was getting it to print on the included
daisy-wheel printer ? all that clacking. Noise! Noise! as the Grinch says. But
I did get my doctorate but had to go to S. Korea and Univ. of
Education(TESOL program) to use it.
Microsoft?s monopoly began in the earliest days of microcomputing. Read
Gate?s letter to programmers /hobbyists to see how a monopolist thinks.
Linux has come along and poked Microsoft in the eye but hasn?t done too
much damage according to this writer. As written here a nostalgia for the
early years may be what we classic computer-philes find so compelling in
cctalk. And to be honest I?ll move to WIN 11 because the choice(s) are
somewhat limited.
Happy computing.
Murray ?
I found this interesting for perspective. The British media (and
AFAICS of Australia, New Zealand and several bits of Europe) have been
saturated with coverage of a much-loved, widely-celebrated and revered
hero of tech.
As FC points out, even the American _tech_ media barely noticed.
?
The prescient, quirky legacy of U.K. gadget inventor Clive Sinclair
Little known in the U.S., Sinclair democratized computing with his
dirt-cheap 1980s PCs. Even his many failures were decades ahead of
their time.
?
https://www.fastcompany.com/90680349/clive-sinclair-obituary
--
Liam Proven ? Profile: https://about.me/liamproven
Email: lproven at cix.co.uk ? gMail/gTalk/gHangouts: lproven at gmail.com
Twitter/Facebook/LinkedIn/Flickr: lproven ? Skype: liamproven
UK: +44 7939-087884 ? ?R (+ WhatsApp/Telegram/Signal): +420 702 829 053
While restoring and repairing a Data General Nova 2/10 I found a bad
bipolar PROM on the CPU board. The PROM has open-collector outputs and is
organized as 32 words by 8 bits. It appears that one of the open-collector
driver transistors is faulty (but it could also be that a fuse has
"healed").
The part is an Intersil IM5600CP, but these were also made by others, for
example Signetics and Philips made the 82S23 and TI and NTE made the faster
SN74S188N. Some vendors still sell these parts and there are even a few on
Ebay.
How do I program these PROMs? I found one somewhat obscure description of
the algorithm in the NTE datasheet, but I suspect that each manufacturer
had (somewhat) different algorithms.
Is there an affordable commercial programmer out there which can program
these PROMs?
Is there a simple design out there which I could breadboard for a one-off
programming job (maybe using an Arduino to control the programming
sequence)?
Thanks and best regards
Tom Hunter
I quite agree that one OS isn?t better than another. It is one?s personal
choice. However, it would be amiss of me not to acknowledge that some
people prefer one over another and will do so until someone proves
otherwise. My dear friend and I don?t let this situation get in the way of
our relationship though.
In the past I have run both WIN and Linux on my machine ? a dual-boot
situation I will not carry forward with WIN 11 ? and find Linux does some
things better than Windows particularly when I run an emulator(It is based
on a Coleco ADAM I?ve had since1984.)
Happy computing.
Murray ?
Dear List,
I am looking for older versions of MatLab (3.x, 4.x, and 5.x) for Unix
and (Open)VMS. I'm happy to pay a reasonable price for media kits, or,
alternatively, images of the installation media would suffice.
The media for Windows or Mac can be found on the various abandonware
sites, but I've had no luck finding MatLab for Unix / VMS so far.
Cheers
Malte
--
Malte Dehling
<mdehling at gmail.com>
Hi
Looking for a Sparcserver 1000/2000 to add to the sun collection. I?ve never seen one of these in the UK, but hopefully there might be one around. Happy to buy / pickup as I know they are heavy in the UK. Outside UK I might be able to arrange for collection.
Thanks.
I recently rescued two Microvax-2000s but both have dead RD53s.? Does anyone have a ROMable image of the Microvax 2000/Vaxstation 2000 boot-PROM patches from Wolfgang Moeller at?http://ftp.gwdg.de/pub/vms/pk2k/??? ?I'm looking to install NetBSD, not VMS and I don't have any VMS systems on which to run PATCH.? ?Microvax 2000 specs say it can sustain 3.3MB/s I/O, which has to be via the SCSI interface.? So a SCSI emulator should be significantly higher performance than an MFM drive (either 30+ year old drive, or emulator).
Web-searching shows a Sean O'Banion has burned the PROMs successfully; I haven't yet found other names.
If someone is willing to burn at least one set of EPROMs for me, I'd pay for the service (either ship EPROMS, or pay for them).
?
You might want to search the Github repositories of a certain "athornton"
looking for something called "yarr".
Obviously it would be wrong to use it. So don't.
Adam
On Fri, 2021-09-24 at 12:00 -0500, cctalk-request at classiccmp.org wrote:
> > supported by any release licensed by VSI, and they changed the
> > PRODUCER
> > key so you can't use those PAKs on DEC/CPQ/HP variants of VMS.
>
> Part of their licensing agreement with HPE which prohibits them from
> selling/licensing any previous version of OpenVMS that they haven't
> worked on.
>
> > HP stopped issuing new hobbyist PAKs back very early in 2020. I put
> > in
> > for a renew March or so and never got it. They were so
> > disinterested in
> > the program that they didn't mention stopping it, so I guess it
> > isn't
> > surprising that the page is still up.
>
> If it's a VAX PAK you need, contact me and I can send you a copy of
> the last VAX OpenVMS Hobbyist PAK sent out.? Note that it expires on
> 1-JAN-2022 so it's good only for a few more months.
Yeah, would have been nice if they would have handed it off to Montegar
again for VAX/early Alpha with the understanding that (a) it would be
the same restrictions that DEC/CPQ/HP had and (b) they weren't bugged
about it ever again. Sigh. Fits into the HP model of "buy and bury" I
guess. At least VAX has other options.
Anyone succeeded in patching the DCL security hole for VAX? I know it
wasn't officially fixed.
Hi all,
My PDP-11/73 has started misbehaving after several years of being very
stable. It is showing symptoms similar to when I've forgotten to enable
the LTC in the past, except this time, it is enable.
Power supply seems good - +5V, +12V, all seems there and appears to be
stable. I've probed the LTC going onto the backplane and I'm getting
50Hz. It looks a tad noisy, not sure if this is a problem. I will see if
I can get a picture of it, but it has very distinct rises and falls, so
hopefully that's ok. Looks to be about 50% duty cycle.
I've attempted several builds of the kernel, including the
out-of-the-box build from 2.11BSD distribution. I've also compiled a
shrunk down kernel without a bunch of devices I don't have, but it still
fails to work. I am using a SCSI2SD so it's easy for me to copy images
and test them in SIMH - they all boot fine in SIMH with a similar setup
(mscp, tmscp, 11/73, 1MB-ish RAM).
Does anyone have any ideas what might be causing this? I've run out of
ideas unfortunately. I'll stick a dump of the boot below, with debug
flag passed showing output from autoconfig.
I've also tried it without the tmscp card - just CPU, RAM and Emulex
UC07 in MSCP mode for scsi disk. I have tried it with less memory, and
I've tried removing the halt jumper from the 11/73 board (W5 if I
remember correctly)
Cheers,
Aaron
---------
^C
BOOT> DU 0
73Boot from ra(0,0,0) at 0172150
: ra(0,0,0)unix -D
Boot: bootdev=02400 bootcsr=0172150
2.11 BSD UNIX #116: Wed Dec 31 18:01:57 CST 1969
root at localhost.2bsd.com:/usr/src/sys/GENERIC
ra0: Ver 5 mod 13
ra0: RA81 size=1216601
phys mem = 1179648
avail mem = 959040
user mem = 307200
_hkprobe = 0
_hkattach = 143330
_hkVec = 0
hkintr = 120
_htprobe = 0
_htattach = 143550
_htVec = 0
htintr = 150
_raprobe = 0
_raattach = 34270
_raVec = 34200
raintr = 100
_rkprobe = 0
_rkattach = 144650
_rkVec = 0
rkintr = 130
_rlprobe = 0
_rlattach = 144770
_rlVec = 0
rlintr = 110
_tmprobe = 0
_tmattach = 143610
_tmVec = 0
tmintr = 160
_tmsprobe = 0
_tmsattach = 143740
_tmsVec = 143730
tmsintr = 200
_tsprobe = 0
_tsattach = 143660
_tsVec = 0
tsintr = 170
_xpprobe = 0
_xpattach = 0
_xpVec = 0
xpintr = 0
endvec = 1000
_conf_int = 16124
CGOOD = 14
CBAD = 24
_nextiv = 5500
trap = 4150
_version = 17400
KERN_NONSEP = 0
Grab 177440 = 36556hk ? csr 177440 vector 210 skipped: No CSR.
Grab 172440 = 36556ht ? csr 172440 vector 224 skipped: No CSR.
Grab 172150 = 0Grab 156 = 240Grab 154 = 100Stuff 14 @ 154
Stuff 340 @ 156
probe ra: return conf_int:Stuff 100 @ 154
Stuff 240 @ 156
ra ? csr 172150 vector 154 bad probe value 224.
Grab 177400 = 36556rk ? csr 177400 vector 220 skipped: No CSR.
Grab 174400 = 36556rl ? csr 174400 vector 160 skipped: No CSR.
Grab 172520 = 36556tm ? csr 172520 vector 224 skipped: No CSR.
Grab 174500 = 0Grab 262 = 0Grab 260 = 0tms ? csr 174500 vector 260 interrupt vector already in use.
Grab 172520 = 36556ts ? csr 172520 vector 224 skipped: No CSR.
xp ? csr 176700 vector 254 skipped: No autoconfig routines.
At this point it is stuck no matter how long I wait.
> From: Tony Duell <ard.p850ug1 at gmail.com>
> Were there 2 things called the KM11?
> The KM11 that I know is the maintenance unit
> From: Paul Birkel
> I think that we're all talking about the ML11-A, or at least are
> intending to ... although the Subject line has been erroneous from the
> get-go ...
Well, at least your brains are working, unlike mine! (Age starting to catch
up with me?) Yes, the ML11; I tried to correct the erroneous 'KL11' and
changed the wrong letter!
Noel