Hello all. I am new to this list, and while I've posted comments before,
that was without formal introduction, so here goes.
I am a 16 year old high school student who works with computer daily. I
perfer to work with older systems (386s are fun!) because they are just
so damned reliable. Mainly, I do software development, but when I have
time, I uhh... can't remember.
Ahh, what the hell...
You can just call me segin.
--
The real problem with C++ for kernel modules is: the language just sucks.
-- Linus Torvalds
I got a BA-356 with 6 drives ad it came with a dual channel
personality module.
I want to use it as a single channel tray, and according to
the user guide it needs a jumper connector.
Anybody have one left over by any chance??
Thanks,
Ed
A friend of mine (in the UK) has some OS/utility CD-ROMs that he has no
use for, and I don't either. AFAIK he'll give them away for the cost of
postage, etc.
Here's a list :
> >> IRIX 5.3 for indy
> >> IRIX C++ 4.0
> >> IRIX F77 4.0.2
> >> IRIX 5.3 for R4400
> >> IRIS development 5.3
> >> IRIS exec env 4.0
> >> SunOS 4.1.1
> >> Solaris 2.3
Please contact :
alanb at chiark.greenend.org.uk
if you're interested.
-tony
I'm prototyping an LED display thingie and was trying to find a
representation of how folks used to do letters on a 7-segment display.
The two historical examples I came up with were the KIM-1 and a Byte
magazine article between about 1977 and 1981. I know there are
several modern Windows fonts out there, but as they differ somewhat, I
was hoping to be compatible with what was commonly done in the late
1970s.
To that end, does anyone have some representation of the KIM's
7-segment renderings or does anyone have a pointer to that old Byte
article about displaying ASCII on 7-segment displays?
Thanks,
-ethan
Looking for datasheets, user guides, dev tools, etc.
for the SMJ68689
and TMS9996 processors.
All the 68689's were supposedly bought up by Uncle Sam
some years ago
when they went out of production, as a critical spare
for missiles or
whatever, but some do turn up on the remarket from
time to time, and
there seems to be a (very relative) glut of them right
now.
The 9996 seems to have been a part TI used strictly
internally and never
marketed, to my knowledge. It would appear to be
basically a 9995 with
an non-multiplexed data bus, ie. full 16 bit data
path, but I haven't
been able to confirm this yet. It's not where I can
get at it easily at
the moment, but I have an XDS emulator system
(non-working at the
moment) for the TMS320C30 DSP that uses a 9996 for the
host processor.
IIRC, it's a 64-pin DIP like the 9900.
Any help greatly appreciated.
jbdigriz
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
>
>Subject: RE: FW: Third round of Diskette Experiments completed (results)
> From: Fred Cisin <cisin at xenosoft.com>
> Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 18:23:34 -0700 (PDT)
> To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts" <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
>
>On Fri, 29 Sep 2006, Chuck Guzis wrote:
>> There were some really terrible 5.25" DSDD (360K) disks marketed. One type
>> was sold by Control Data (StorageMaster). If I see one of those in a
>> . . .
>> "Elephant" brand 360Ks can be problematical in the same way, as can the
>> "Precision" brand.
>
>Just about every brand produced some bad batches.
>The Verbatims right before "Datalife" were pretty bad. Was the trademark
>"Datalife" created just to try to reassure us that they were no longer
>going to jopardize the life of our data?
>
>The worst 360Ks that I encountered was Roytype (Royal Typewriter).
>Within a few minutes after writing and verifying, they would be blank
>again. Hmmmm. could also get something like that from the wrong
>coercivity, ...
>
It all started back when with the 3M Blackwatch audotape.. Great stuff until
it was around afew years then it shed binder like mad.
It takes a bit of majik to get the oxide coating to stick to the mylar
base.
the other factor was that of all the brands I think the base material
only came from three or five makers like 3M, BASF, Nashua, Dupont maybe
others. The key is if a maker lost the receipe that could show up
as their brand and five others or maybe only the others!
Allison
>
>Subject: Re: FW: Third round of Diskette Experiments completed (results)
> From: ard at p850ug1.demon.co.uk (Tony Duell)
> Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 23:39:28 +0100 (BST)
> To: cctalk at classiccmp.org
>
>[...]
>
>
>> The Diskette Experiments, Phase III
>> ----------------------------------
>>
>> The Test Disks
>> --------------
>
>[...]
>
>> Drunk Disk
>> ----------
>
>[...]
>
>
>> Conclusion: The disk is unreadable due to a
>> physical (non-bit) failure of the disk jacket
>> and internal disk mylar heavily sticking to the
>> jacket itself.
>
>My first reaction would the to open up one side of the jacket, slide out
>the disk (and keep it the right way up!), clean the surface of said disk
>and then either 'mount a naked floppy' or use a spare jacket.
>
>It would be interesting to know if the data could be recovered if you did
>that (in all 3 cases).
I've had media both soaked and dried after soaking with various sticky
beverages. I've found they cleaned up fine and read with out dificulty.
I've mounted them with out the jacket and using an old one with cleaned
and dried media.
Generally floppies do not like any abrasive damage, holes, some solvents
and of course magnetic fields. Other than that it's amazing what
will survive.
Allison
AMBRA was made by IBM if my memory isn't faulty. It's very likely that much of the firmware is similar to IBM BIOSes.
Unfortunately, I don't have any experience with IBM PC systems of the 1991 era.
Hi,
Paul posted this a day or so after the other
post and it seems the Hot & Cold Affair disk
did work again after leaving it overnight (see
below).
Regards,
Andrew B
aliensrcooluk at yahoo.co.uk
--- Paul Panks <lumberjacks76 at lycos.com> wrote:
There is an addendum added to yesterday's
posting of Phase III of the Diskette Experiments.
Here is the addendum:
A new conclusion has been reached regarding
the second disk experiment. Additionally, the
final Phase III conclusion has been modified
somewhat to showcase this change:
"The Hot and Cold Affair
-----------------------
This test called for putting ice cubes on the
front side of the disk, while simultaneously
holding the back side of the disk over a
stovetop range at Medium heat (held
approximately 3/4th of a foot from the
surface of the stovetop due to overwhelming
heat and potential hand burn considerations).
The disk was held over the surface for a
period of ten (10) minutes, while carefully
juggling the ice cubes on the 1st surface
simultaneously.
The disk was allowed to cool for a period of
20 minutes, then read. The result was a disk
that did not read, as the internal mylar floppy
could barely be moved by force from side to
side by this person.
Conclusion: The disk was unreadable due to a
physical (non-bit) failure of the disk jacket
and internal disk mylar semi-sticking to the
jacket itself. However, after waiting overnight
and trying the disk again, it read without
error. Performing a simple read/write on the
disk -- writing (then reading back) a 2 block
sequential file -- worked flawlessly. Although
heating the disk and placing icecubes atop it
is not recommended, the disk nonetheless did
recover once it was allowed to cool overnight."
The conclusion has also been modified
somewhat. Here is the change:
"Experiment Phase III Conclusions
--------------------------------
Two of the disks were a total loss, as the
experiment never progressed beyond the first
question asked ("Could a disk still be read by
the disk drive?"). The disk in the "Hot/Cold
Affair" experiment failed at first, but then
worked upon waiting 24 hours for the internal
disk mylar to cool overnight.
Disks are not impervious to permanent and
irreversible physical damage from oatmeal,
milk, water, heat ( >= 250 degrees F ), ice
cubes, shoes and golf spikes. Heating a disk
and placing ice cubes atop it will cause it to
temporarily become unreadable, although the
disk should return to working order within 24
hours. It is nonetheless strongly recommended
by this person that end users strictly avoid
such implements (as described above) when at,
near or around a floppy disk or drive."
The entirety of the Diskette Experiments can
be viewed online here:
http://www.geocities.com/dunric/diskfun.txt
Paul
>
>Subject: Re: FW: Third round of Diskette Experiments completed (results)
> From: Jules Richardson <julesrichardsonuk at yahoo.co.uk>
> Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 15:54:51 +0000
> To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
>
>Allison wrote:
>> Generally floppies do not like any abrasive damage, holes, some solvents
>> and of course magnetic fields. Other than that it's amazing what
>> will survive.
>
>.... unless it's a 3.5" floppy made in the last 6 or so years, then you just
>need to *look* at them funny and they fail :)
Actually I was talkkking about 8 and 5,25 media I was trying to recover
data from.
>Actually, typically I find the failure rate to be about 2/3 - I don't think I
>can think of a single other product that reaches the consumer with such a high
>rating.
Jules,
The last time I'd seens that failure rate I started checking the drives.
It seeems the drives had so much dust (at work) they were scraping the
media to failure. Cleaned the drives and the problem would go away
for a few months. The media was a the cheapest 3.5 available. What
would happen is once the heads built up a mixute of media and dust
it would routinely destroy disks after one use after that. Outside
of that and outright bad drives I found 3.5" to be very reliable and
somewhat more immune to some of the things that kill soft jacket disks.
In fact when AOL was sending their virus out on 3.5" floppies (pre bloat)
I'd use them and still have a few that see regular use. I figure they are
as cheap as they come!
Allison
Hi folks,
I recently got a Data General Nova 2 CPU. It is a very late built OEM
machine (Boards say ?1973 Data General but IC timestamps tell a
different story from the time around 1977/1978).
The machine came with 80kw (!!!!!) of core memory which is two an a half
time of 32kw wich is the Nova's address space. The memory is banked by
very simple MMU which bank-switches the lower 16k. If I power the unit
up I can simply use 32kw of core. That seems to work. Have not yet
worked out how the mmu is switched. Will worry about that later...
After replacing the front panel lights I can manually read and write
memory locations. And I *think* that the CPU works. At least basically.
The machine is full of made in Germany boards made by some strange
unknown OEM company.
There is a Diablo disk drive with a diablo controller. The only function
I can see at the moment is a red led on the controller which says
"ready" in sync with the ready light on the disk drive. Drive looks
good. If I try to boot the system via the built-in dma loading routine
it simply hangs in an endless loop and nothing happens.
At the moment I would be glad to hook up some kind of "standard tty" to
the machine.
Does the Nova 2 have a standard tty port built directly into the one-PCB
cpu? That would be wonderful!
If anybody can help me with tips, tricks, software, hardware, experience
or any other interesting stuff and information - please let me know!
I don't know what to do with the machine at the moment.
I think I also could need some "standard peripherals" for the machine.
Thanks a lot!
Best wishes from Bavaria (!),
Philipp :-)
Well, I have a bunch of open expansion space in my RK07 cabinet, and I
was thinking of somehow mounting the ESDI disks inside it. What sort of
products exist for mounting these disks externally, probably in a
seperate cabinet from the controller?
I think that F/W SCSI-II (FAST-10) predated Ultra (FAST-20) by a few years, anyway: F/W SCSI was available on the
SGI Onyx (in either diff or SE) which was introduced in 1993.
I'm a big fan of SCA drives + adaptors for old systems since the 50-pin drives are noticeably ancient now (most
at around 1998 or before). A SCA drive + 50-pin adaptor is much newer (and 50-pin drives of any capacity (9GB+)
have a substantial premium over SCA and 68-pin models. Some machines (Sun lunchboxes in particular) don't have
space for a SCA drive + adaptor board, though.
The latest SCSI standard (SCSI-IV I think) no longer requires drives to support 8-bit transfers and asynchronous
mode. Some of the drives I've seen still do, but be warned...
I ran across a Japanese site that seems to specialize in selling NEC PC
9801-family items. I don't know how many 9801's ever made it to the USA,
but the architecture's fairly common in the CNC machine tools world.
http://www.pc98factory.com/
Cheers,
Chuck
Tony Duell wrote:
>>The other major loss is the diagrams on his TI59
calculator page
>>(http://xgistor-echo.ath.cx/ti59.htm), again this
appears to be unique
>>material not available anywhere else. The files
there were called
>>TI59-Diag+psu-in-eps.zip, TI59-PSU.zip,
TI59annotation-8.zip,
>>Ti59Diagram0401.zip, ti59-Emu-v11.exe,
ti59blokdiagram.jpg,
>>ti59corechips.jpg, ti59diagram.jpg,
ti59scandiagram.jpg,
>>ti59clocktiming.jpg, ti59psu.jpg, ti59cmplx.jpg
>
>
>It's not the same thing, but, being
graphically-challenged on this PC, I
>made notes of the pinouts of the ICs, etc, from said
files by hand in a
>notebook. I still have that, and could type in said
pinouts (which would
>be a great help to anyone trying to recreate the
files by
>reverse-engineering a TI59 or whatever).
>
>If the originals don't turn up anywhere, let me know
and I'll get typing.
>
>-tony
>
I have the following files (the jpg's in the html
page):
ti59blokdiagram.jpg
ti59corechips.jpg
ti59diagram.jpg
ti59scandiagram.jpg
ti59clocktiming.jpg
ti59psu.jpg
ti59cmplx.jpg
I sent Tony a private msg, waiting to hear back from
him where to upload them.
So I can save you that much typing, anyway :-)
jbdigriz
ps. Tony Wills, I do not have the files in the ftp
download area, including the emulater, however.
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
Hi,
I thought some of you might be interested in
Pauls experiments. Has anyone here conducted
similar experiments?
Regards,
Andrew B
aliensrcooluk at yahoo.co.uk
--- Paul Panks <lumberjacks76 at lycos.com> wrote:
The third phase of the now infamous '5.25"
Diskette Experiments' have been completed.
These experiments began back in 2003 and are
in their third (and thankfully final) installment.
I did the tests this evening and came to some
(not surprising) conclusions.
Here were the three tests:
The Diskette Experiments, Phase III
----------------------------------
The Test Disks
--------------
I used three separate test disks, one for each
of the three tests.
On Track 17-0 through 15-5 was placed a 61
block file (15,419 bytes), Cleve Blakemore's
Dark Fortress (typed in from the January 1987
issue of Ahoy! magazine). On Track 19-0
through 22-1 was placed a 61 block file, the
same aforementioned Cleve Blakemore game.
The desire was to have two reasonably sized
programs as the first two programs on disk,
occupying an aggregate total of 122 disk blocks.
The tests would determine three things about
each disk:
1) Could a disk still be read by the disk drive?
2) If so, could the original data (both programs)
be read and verified without a single bit error?
3) Thirdly, could the disk then be formatted
and a simple read/write performed to it?
The results of the tests are as follows, with
some surprises:
Drunk Disk
----------
The original test was going to be beer (1/2
cup) and water (1/2 cup) for thirty minutes.
This test was later modified from using beer
to oatmeal (1 package), non-fat dry milk (1/2
cup) and water (three 8 oz. cups), mixed in a
bowl, which I then let stand for thirty minutes.
The disk was then removed and allowed to
quickly dry via a paper towel, wiped gently
against both sides. The result was a disk that
did not read, as the internal mylar floppy
could very barely be moved by force from
side to side by this person (more than any of
the experiments, the oatmeal, water and dry
milk mixture really stuck the disk to the jacket
quite solidly).
Conclusion: The disk is unreadable due to a
physical (non-bit) failure of the disk jacket
and internal disk mylar heavily sticking to the
jacket itself.
The Hot and Cold Affair
-----------------------
This test called for putting ice cubes on the
front side of the disk, while simultaneously
holding the back side of the disk over a
stovetop range at Medium heat (held
approximately 3/4th of a foot from the
surface of the stovetop due to overwhelming
heat and potential hand burn considerations).
The disk was held over the surface for a
period of ten (10) minutes, while carefully
juggling the ice cubes on the 1st surface
simultaneously.
The disk was allowed to cool for a period of
20 minutes, then read. The result was a disk
that did not read, as the internal mylar floppy
could barely be moved by force from side to
side by this person.
Conclusion: The disk is unreadable due to a
physical (non-bit) failure of the disk jacket
and internal disk mylar semi-sticking to the
jacket itself.
The Walk About
--------------
This round of testing required walking on a
disk using three separate shoes, using
moderate pressure, for a period of 1 minute
each. The shoes were: two business
dress-style shoes, with small platform-like
heels, and golf shoes (non-metal spikes used).
The disk was walked on using moderate
pressure and substituting each shoe for 20
seconds each, for a total of 1 minute
aggregate time.
The disk was then immediately read by the
disk drive. The result was a disk that did not
read, as the internal mylar floppy could barely
be moved (though easier than the first
experiment) by force from side to side by this
person.
Conclusion: The disk is unreadable due to a
physical (non-bit) failure of the disk jacket
and internal disk mylar semi-sticking to the
jacket itself.
Experiment Phase III Conclusions
--------------------------------
The disks were a total loss, as the experiment
never progressed beyond the first question
asked ("Could a disk still be read by the disk drive
?").
Disks are not impervious to permanent and
irreversible physical damage from oatmeal,
milk, water, heat ( >= 250 degrees F ), ice
cubes, shoes and golf spikes. It is strongly
recommended by this person that end users
strictly avoid such implements (as described
above) when at, near or around a floppy disk
or drive.
Paul
I have two complete Systems with Manuals, Printers, and quite a bit
of software. Don't use them anymore and need to give them a new home.
Mike in Ottawa, Ontario suggested I contact you. If you can help me
sell these, I would highly appreciate it.
I can be contacted at; alandmaedeb at yahoo,com
Not sure how long I'll have access to the Mac Mail.
Al DeBord, Chillicothe, OH, 45601, USA
>
>Subject: Re: Sipke de Wal, xgistor, SC/MP, TI59
> From: "Ethan Dicks" <ethan.dicks at gmail.com>
> Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 07:44:44 +1200
> To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts" <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
>
>On 9/28/06, Tony Wills <ajwills at paradise.net.nz> wrote:
>>
>> Re Sipke's xgistor.ath.cx website and his National Semiconductor SC/MP
>> (Scamp) CPU emulator, thanks for the replies I've had so far. I've
>> collected up many of the files formerly from his site and created an "echo"
>> of his site...
>> The SC/MP page is now complete (http://xgistor-echo.ath.cx/scmp.htm), but
>> I've seen no sign of his SC/MP emulator and would dearly love to see a
>> copy. The emulator was in a file called Scmp09.zip 1.3MB
>
>Thanks for doing this. I did have a look and did not happen to snag a copy
>of the emulator in years past, but I probably should have, given that I have
>multiple INS8073 systems.
The 8073 is extended over the Sc/mpII. The flavor I have is the
the isp500 (pmos) and The 8073 which has Nibble BASIC.
>Since folks are digging around for SC/MP stuff, does anyone have a
>disassembler? I'm trying to dig into some INS8073 firmware and would
>rather not a) do it by hand with an instruction set listing, or b) write a
>disassembler from scratch. I'd prefer a UNIX-compatible disassembler,
>but could use a DOS one if that's all there is out there.
Never seen one. The only assembler I'd ran under ISIS.
I'd love to get an assembler and a few tools for the 8073 to play with
it more outside of basic.
Allison
I've just been sent this e-mail about a VAX4000 in Luton:
> From Jez Higgins <jez at jezuk.co.uk> via accu-general list.
>
> Just received this from a friend of mine. If anyone's interest,
> please contact me offlist.
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: 'ere, fancy this?
> Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 09:32:47 +0100 (BST)
>
> Need an answer asap - any interest in a gratis VAX4000 with three
> external optical drives? Deadline - I need to know by Sunday night as
> disposal is Monday morning.
>
> -----------------------------------
>
> I don't have any further information at the moment. The machine
> itself is probably in the Luton area. I'm trying to find out if
> it works :)
>
> Jez
I have no more info about this thing than the above. Probably best
to reply directly to Jez Higgins, at the e-mail shown.
--
John Honniball
coredump at gifford.co.uk
All,
night before last, I dreamed someone was showing me a piece
of circa 1950 or so radio gear, which was so constructed as to
*accept* power via a standard 120V wall socket built into its back.
The problem with that arrangement is that it implied the existence of
a "power adapter cord" with a normal 120V wall plug (with two exposed
blades) on either end.
As soon as this piece of gear was shown to my dream
incarnation, I started yelling "No! NO! That shouldn't exist!" and
trying to take a big pair of shears to it to eliminate the safety
hazard.
I remember the museum curator, or whoever was showing me
this, looking displeased just before I woke up, and my wife, looking
displeased just after I (and she) woke up.
--
Mark Tapley, Dwarf Engineer
(I haven't cleared my neighborhood)
210-379-4635
Anyone on the list intimately familier with the Data I/O 29A
and/or 29B device programmers?
Went for a "last hurrah" today at a surplus shop which is
closing it's doors - what started as a simple inquiry about a
logicpak module I saw on the shelf ended in me taking
home a boatload of modules, adapters and other 29x "bits".
Which has spawned a few Q's...
Dave
--
dave06a (at) Dave Dunfield
dunfield (dot) Firmware development services & tools: www.dunfield.com
com Collector of vintage computing equipment:
http://www.classiccmp.org/dunfield/index.html