A reference was made to MicroNova. Like Data General MicroNova? Like the MicroNova that?s in my lock up, that I haven?t
run in 15 years? Like the MicroNova with the 16 or 32 serial ports, I don?t remember, for terminals? Like the MicroNova I lost
the 10M washing machine platter drive from? Then threw the removable platter out because I couldn?t find the washing machine?
That MicroNova?????????
Kevin J Andres
Senior Technician
Engineered Protection Systems Inc.
HYPERLINK "mailto:kandres at epssecurity.com"mailto:kandres at epssecurity.com
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.11.0/927 - Release Date: 7/30/2007 5:02 PM
I believe you're thinking of the book "The Art of Digital Electronics"...I
don't remember who wrote it. I too have been considering building an 8/i
compatible, and wouldn't mind some insight.
Devon
Ethan Dicks <ethan.dicks at gmail.com> wrote..............
Subject: Re: newbie building a scratch-built computer
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
There is _lots_ of software for that platform, of course. The PDP-8
has a rich history.
I've been re-reading a book on processor design I picked up a few
years ago, based on a recommendation on this list. I am blanking on
the title, but it describes a 74183/74181-based F20 and a 2910-based
microprogrammed F30 PDP-8/i-compatible CPU. I've been mulling over
what it would take to build one of those (besides lots of time ;-)
On 7/31/07, Chuck Guzis <cclist at sydex.com> wrote:
> On 31 Jul 2007 at 1:11, woodelf wrote:
>
> > All of it (8K+) with serial I/O to boot is my guess.
>
> That was my thought. Why fool with IM6120s when you fit the durned
> thing in a teacup? How about a handheld 8/i? Maybe a few MB of CF
> for storage and an LCD display for a terminal...
Hmm... that does sound interesting. A 320x200 LCD panel isn't
expensive (I have several raw ones on hand w/touch sensors), and could
be driven to 80 cols w/a 3x5 font (as was once used to give the C-64
"80 columns"). A "really cheap" terminal could be an older Palm Pilot
running one of the extant terminal emulators, sharing a new enclosure
with the PDP-8 board, attached internally via TTL serial.
> Might make an interesting coversation piece.
I think a 12-bit hand-held would be pretty cool.
-ethan
All:
Does anyone know of a tool that will take an arbitrary list of source
files (say C) and cross reference the variables and routines among the
source files? Here?s the problem. I?m trying to adapt and extract a small
portion of a large project for a smaller project. The header files spider
all over the place and the code calls functions in several modules. In all,
there?s several hundred of source files in the large project and I think
I?ll probably need fragments of about 15 of them.
Does this make sense to anyone? I want to take the source file I?m
interested in and find out where the variables and functions are declared in
other modules.
Rich
--
Rich Cini
Collector of Classic Computers
Build Master and lead engineer, Altair32 Emulator
http://www.altair32.comhttp://highgate.comm.sfu.ca/~rcini/classiccmp
Has anybody come up with a easy to implement solution for connecting
an ASCII keyboard (or, specifically, an Apple //e keyboard) to a
modern computer system? I'm just beginning to try to wrap my head
around this problem, and it seems... non-trivial...
The goal would be a USB-compliant HID device that would allow a //e
keyboard to be used on a modern computer.
Hi,
Is it possible to read, but not necessarily write, a NorthStar Horizon hard
sector disk using a standard PC NEC 765 type FDC?
If not, why? The NorthStar controller uses FM and/or MFM encoding but I do
not understand the reason why.
Based on what I have read, it appears the NorthStar disks are unreadable on
the PC without special hardware such as the MatchPoint PC and/or Catweasel
cards.
Thanks in advance for your enlightenment on the subject.
Andrew Lynch
Joe,
If your goal is primarily to build a classic, "retro" computer, the Micro-KIM or Replica 1 kits
(Apple 1 clone) would be a good choices. However, I see your mention of a desire to learn some
machine language coding. In that case, it might be wise to learn something that has modern
applications, like coding for microcontrollers. There are a huge number of trainers, kits and
development boards for those and, because they are current technology, a large number of books and
other information about them. As a big plus, any coding experience you'd get would have value on
a resume.
The 8051 has always been a very popular and much-used microcontroller, but I'm not sure if it's
still the most popular. The Atmel AVR series, especially their Mega devices, seem to be getting a
lot of attention. Among the large number of board choices for that series, there's a little $20
demo board (not a kit) based upon a Mega device called the AVR Butterfly. It has an LCD display,
light sensor and thermistor. You could build things around it since it isn't a kit:
http://www.avrfreaks.net/index.php?module=FreaksTools&func=viewItem&item_id…
There are a whole series of other AVR-based boards to choose from and the total number of
microcontroller trainers, evaluation and development boards available based upon other
microcontroller series is huge.
Bill
____________________________________________________________________________________
Boardwalk for $500? In 2007? Ha! Play Monopoly Here and Now (it's updated for today's economy) at Yahoo! Games.
http://get.games.yahoo.com/proddesc?gamekey=monopolyherenow
a media organization in south florida (palm beach, broward, miami-dade
counties, cities such as West palm beach, delray, boca, fort lauderdale,
hollywood, miami, etc.) is looking for people who collect
vintage/classic/old computers regarding an article on that topic they are
working on.
If anyone is interested in this, please contact me off-list as soon as
possible for details.
Best regards,
Jay West
>
>Subject: Reading NorthStar Horizon hard sector disks on PC
> From: "Andrew Lynch" <lynchaj at yahoo.com>
> Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 23:14:17 -0400
> To: <cctech at classiccmp.org>
>
>Hi,
>
>Is it possible to read, but not necessarily write, a NorthStar Horizon hard
>sector disk using a standard PC NEC 765 type FDC?
>
>If not, why? The NorthStar controller uses FM and/or MFM encoding but I do
>not understand the reason why.
The disks do not have any of the needed marks recorded to sychronize to.
Also the check byte is not a CRC of the type that any FDC uses. As to FM/MFM
yes thats the same but that only defines what the bits sent by the serial
stream are represented by on the magnetic media bot the next level up
in the formatting of the data.
To simplify, the NS* controller uses the holes to signify where data is
rather than laying down a complex series of recorded marks to signal
where the contrller where the disk is at. The result is that the
controller hardware is simplified and the CPU can do some of the work.
>Based on what I have read, it appears the NorthStar disks are unreadable on
>the PC without special hardware such as the MatchPoint PC and/or Catweasel
>cards.
Correct.
Allison
I was reviewing my small calculator collection tonight and unboxed
this old thing:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/chiclassiccomp/946510637/
I've had it for at least ten years and had nearly forgotten about it.
It's a Dietzgen with Nixies, it's got "scientific" functions, and
takes a standard power cord. That's about the extent of my knowledge.
Anyone know the model number on it, or other interesting details?
TIA...
-j
Anyone looking for Tek terminal stuff? This specimen looks pretty
clean, and might be something of interest to the Tek Terminal collectors
here.
Jim
260133525847
Hi.
I also have one of those LCD's, but with the elo Touch reference
(ELT121C-7SWA-1)
By means have you figure out the Pin-Out for the power Brick ??
Best regards and thanks in advance.
Samuel Antunes
Hi Guys,
A few days back I posted ImageDisk 1.17 to the site, and it's just
been reported (and confirmed) that it had a bug which causes it to
write images incorrectly (fortunately it appears to read them
correctly).
I've corrected the problem and updated the package - if you have
downloaded 1.17 before today, please download it again.
I've also restored Imagedisk 1.16 to the site, listing it as the
last known stable release, so that people won't be left hanging if
(when) something like this happens again.
<rant>
I apologize for the inconvienence - I've been sitting on 1.17 for a
few months - there were substantial changes made to the read/write disk
functions accomodate the ability to record the data from bad sectors,
and I knew there was a strong possibility of problems. I made these
changes at the request of a member of this list who just "had to have
them" right away.
Took me a fair bit time to make the changes, which also involved research,
pestering Chuck, Allison and others and lots of trial and error to figure out
what I could and could not do with the 765FDC and bad sectors. This also
required additions to the image file format, and therefore update to all of
the utilities which manipulate them - During this time I had several
correspondances with the individual who had requested the changes, and he
promised me that if I made them, he would test it thoroughly, make extensive
use of it (iirc several hundred disks to process) and give me a full report
of any problems etc. that were encountered before I released the software
for mass consumption.
So I delivered the new software to him (early may), and he immediately fell
silent. Contacted him a week later, and was told that he hadn't had time to
look at it, but would let me know when he got around to it.... Now several
months have gone by and not a peep from him.
So... I posted it anyway (my bad), and of course there was a problem. I've
corrected it, but due to the number of changes required for this update, it
could still benefit from some outside testing (any volenteers?)
It's annoying to invest time to do someone a favor (that they asked for) only
to find out that they consider their own time too valuable to follow up their
part - I'm sure Chuck will tell me that this is one of the reasons he finally
told people to shove Teledisk beyond the reach of solar illumination...
</rant>
If anyone can help check out 1.17, that would be much appreciated.
Regards,
Dave
--
dave06a (at) Dave Dunfield
dunfield (dot) Firmware development services & tools: www.dunfield.com
com Collector of vintage computing equipment:
http://www.classiccmp.org/dunfield/index.html
Email me offlist if interested....
--------------------
Please reply.
Hi
I was wondering if you could help. I don't really want to throw this stuff
away, but I need to get rid of it. My next step is to dispose of it on our
"free dump day". I don't want any money, just my room back. If you know of
anyone that would be willing to help me find a home for these I would
greatly appreciate it. I am in the Frankfort, KY area and am willing to
travel up to 2 hours. I only have 1 truck, but I can make several trips. I
have a room full of computers, monitors, dot matrix printers, keyboards,
mice, etc. It is more than a pickup load. I have no clue about what they
are or if they are worth anything to anybody. If it's junk, please let me
know that also.
Here is a partial list. I haven't made it to the other end of the room or
the attic yet. I haven't tested any of these.
IBM Personal Computer XT - I have about 18 of these - some are 5150 and some
are 5160.
Radio Shack TRS-80 Model 4 - I have 4 of these
1 each of the following:
Cathode Ray Oscillograph
IBM PS-1
IBM PS/2
Heathkit H9
Dell 333 s/L
AT&T 6386 SX/EL20 W6S
Aptiva 510
Zenith Data System Z-Server EX 433DE
Gateway P5-120
Macintosh Centris 660 AV
Zenith Data Systems Z-433D+
AXCEL by Packard Bell
Radio Shack TRS-80 Model III
A couple of No Names
I have about 30 more that I will need time to get info from.
Printers:
IBM ProPrinter
Panasonic Quiet KX-P2135 24 Pin Color
IBM Quietwriter III 5202
Panasonic KX-P1624 24 Pin MultiMode - I have 2 of these
Epson LQ-1000
IBM 2381-001
IBM Quickwriter
I have more printers, but haven't gotten to them yet. Maybe 10 or so.
I do have a strange looking monitor. It says CIT-101e.
I also have a lot of monitors, keyboards, and mice. There should be some
complete systems in there somewhere, but I don't know what goes together. I
do know that some of the monitors are monochrome. It just piled up faster
than I could keep up with it.
I am just putting in numbers and info that is on the machines. I don't know
what is inside.
Thanks,
Karen
I had an excellent time this year as usual, even though we initially had
some unforseen problems getting rolling toward Purdue. Lots to see, and I
had a fun time socializing(and on occasion brainstorming) with those I don't
see nearly often enough. The speakers were great and very entertaining, and
Rick did a great job coordinating dinner for Saturday night. As an
exhibitor, I have to say that the turnout was way better than I thought,
especially on Sunday.
Thanks to everyone involved for making this not only a success but an
entertaining endevour as well.
Looking forward to 4.0!
Julian
Dear all,
You may be familiar with the phenomenon of a project list years long,
and with the way it often gets ordered: "project #345 sounds interesting
today."
Well, this weekend, I finally managed to combine motivation, interest
and parts, and assemble a working 5.25" + catweasel floppy imaging
setup. This moved up the priority list because the machine I usually
use to image floppies can't do SD, and these old Osborne 1 floppies have
been on my desk staring at me since someone on IRC asked about Oz-ware
weeks ago...
I'm want to have backups of my piles of floppies, as well as to be at
least a somewhat responsible preserver (in the unlikely event I actually
managed to hang onto something not already widely saved), and to be able
to share bits and pieces as seems appropriate. I'd like to be able to
both re-create floppies as well as use the data in emulation. I
understand the latter is going to require format conversions in a lot of
cases, and that the necessary converters may or may not exist yet. I've
used both ImageDisk and cw2dmk in the past.
What I'm wondering is this: what about the DMK or IMD formats is going
to cause me problems later? I prefer data images to flux images because
the latter are clearly not directly usable in any emulator. I
understand how a flux image enables more accurate re-creation of a real
floppy, but the scope and implications of that are a bit fuzzy. I'd
like to have some feel for how many things I'm going to be unable to
reproduce later, how they'll go wrong, why images won't be useful to
others, etc.
Obviously no single solution is suitable for all applications, my
mileage will vary, &c. Both of the above-mentioned are excellent pieces
of work with many valid applications. I suppose I'm basically looking
for war stories which illustrate particular technical issues here -- the
criteria for making the choices, not the mythical "best answers".
I've spent some time googling through the cctalk archives without
finding the kinds of discussion I was hoping for, but I'll cheerfully
accept hints about how to approach the problem that way.
De
Does anyone have any advice on finding a replacement fan for a
BA353-AE enclosure? I finally managed to crack open the case, and it
looks to be a Nidec a33475-57 fan.
Zane
--
| Zane H. Healy | UNIX Systems Administrator |
| healyzh at aracnet.com (primary) | OpenVMS Enthusiast |
| MONK::HEALYZH (DECnet) | Classic Computer Collector |
+----------------------------------+----------------------------+
| Empire of the Petal Throne and Traveller Role Playing, |
| PDP-10 Emulation and Zane's Computer Museum. |
| http://www.aracnet.com/~healyzh/ |
On Thu, 26 Jul 2007 21:50:07 -0700, "Chuck Guzis" <cclist at sydex.com>
wrote:
> On 26 Jul 2007 at 21:39, dwight elvey wrote:
>
>> Hi
>> I have soem tubes made in the 1920's that still have a
>> good vacuum. How much longer should I wait.
>> Dwight
>
> Isn't that the whole idea behind a getter?
Activated getter works on active gasses (and some of the heavier
inert ones also) up to the point where the activated surface becomes
saturated. In a well sealed tube, that can be a substantial time.
However, it does not work with helium. Helium abhors a vacuum and
will attempt to equilibrate its partial pressure inside the tube with
that outside - glass and getter be damned. Same goes for HeNe lasers
- the helium inside makes for the outside world and the laser goes
south. I've been keeping a pair of HP Interferometers going for years
by occasionally putting them in pure He for several weeks, all the
time measuring the output and waiting for it to come back to spec. If
you have an old, well-sealed tube that has gone gassy due to helium,
you can rescue it by putting it in a high vacuum for a couple of
months...
CRC