The 3480 and other large stuff is in Chicago.
The 3472 and 3477 terminals and keyboards are in WI.
Cindy
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>From the people in Chicago:
I have the Cabinets I am not sure about the part numbers though. I tried
searching them but i was lost. We have 2, 3490-A10 a 3490-B40, two 44P4352
(as you will see in the pictures the laptop is with one of them) and what i
think is 2066-002. Again I am not 100% on these part numbers. I hope the
pictures help.
He did not send the pictures as attachments, so I can't save them. I have
asked him to re-send them.
Cindy
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
CH is pretty nasty right now. We're trying to use my friend's old basement
office apartment to get this started. He has been there for years and it's
very cheap-- for now.
Seattle has gotten ridiculous, so if the building sells or the rent goes
up, most of the gear will get packed away once again. A definite risk
factor, but hopefully by then we will at least have produced an active
community.
Or maybe it's all doomed from the get-go; only one way to find out-- It's
all conjecture until I get around to moving my ass... :)
We are quite close, just need to clean, move in a few more systems, and
figure out the initial access structure.
Any local folk interested in participating should ping me off-list.
- Ian
On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 12:37 PM, Al Kossow <aek at bitsavers.org> wrote:
> On 10/8/15 11:38 AM, Ian Finder wrote:
>
> We do not intend to overlap with a big, professional museum like CHM or
>> LCM. Rather think of this as a kind of a maker-space for old systems; There
>> is a lot of interest in Seattle- largely people from the software industry-
>> who would love to code something on a real PDP 11, Symbolics or a Xerox or
>> a 3B2 / BLIT, but aren't equipped to handle care and feeding of these sorts
>> of machines.
>>
>>
> Good. There have been false starts for something similar down here for at
> least five years
>
> The problem is real estate has become insanely expensive here, so it is
> tough to get traction.
>
> I have a good friend that lived on CH in the 90's, and it sounds like
> things are getting bad up there
> too.
>
>
>
>
--
Ian Finder
(206) 395-MIPS
ian.finder at gmail.com
My Chicago buddy has an entire IBM 3480 system, server and storage. The
storage rack has 64 hard drives. He has the tapes that go with it.
Email me if you are interested. I can get PN and pics. Will palletize and
ship or you can pick up. No, it is not a freebie J
Cindy Croxton
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
> From: Jay Jaeger
> one ought to first check whether the board is intended for a UNIBUS or
> Q-Bus system!
Easiest way to do that is to look on the back side at the fingers; if the
board does not do interrupts or DMA (likely, if this is a ROM card), there
will be U-shaped traces to 'jumper' the grant lintes: a QBUS card will have a
pair, with a single finger space between them; a UNIBUS card will have a
group of four, with no spaces between them. Either pattern is absolutely
definitive. If you don't see either... time to drag out the ohm-meter! :-)
Noel
While we're on the subject of half-inch tape, the innards of a CDC
half-inch tape cleaner, item 281807671456. The seller was surprised to
find out that the thing was merely a tape cleaner and not a tape drive,
so he probably would like to see an offer. It appears to be complete,
but for the outer cabinet. Sellers says it powers up just fine.
Not mine, but cleaners don't come up too often, so I thought the list
might be interested.
--Chuck
I know what you mean. There were two awesome CDC 609 available semi locally recently. Carl and I fantasized to pick them up. When we looked at the weight, clearer mind prevailed and we gave up. Not sure what happened to them.
Marc
================================================
Subject: Re: Manual for the Overland Data OD3201 Tape Drive?
My favorite drive is/are the CDC 607/609. Wonderful units--1500 lbs.,
IIRC. At any rate, you wouldn't want one to fall on you. Less so the
65x and 66x drives.
--Chuck
I used John's routine to write and Chuck's to read an HP 1000 SIMH tape image, and the file diff came out identical, give or take a few end characters that I don't believe are part of the data. So you guys are essentially compatible as expected (16 bit machine it sure is).
Marc
From: Chuck Guzis <cclist at sydex.com>
Subject: Re: Writing SCSI 9-Track Mag Tapes from Windows/DOS
> On 10/06/2015 11:54 AM, Rich Alderson wrote:
> Of course, that's mostly true for those machines restricted to silly
> octets as their native data representation. :->
And one finds odd-byte-sized records not infrequently in big iron--and
then you have to ask "where do most half-inch 9-track tapes originate?"
It ain't from DEC, for sure.
FWIW, my routines don't bother to pad to an even byte boundary.
--Chuck
Today they start getting cut up if no one responds.
3472 and 3477 terminals, keyboards, printers, etc. 12 pallets total.
The terminals are coax. Maybe 100 of them. Keyboards are 122 key, prob abt
150 of them, most have cables. Some are RJ45 and some 5-pin DIN.
Yes, you can go look, if you want 10 or more of something. No, he won't
ship individual units.
Located in WI. Email me off list if you seriously want to go buy.
Cindy
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
I did ask, and he said there is nothing labeled 360 or 390 or any
server-looking cabinet, nor anything waist tall except the line printers,
and nothing that looks like a computational device except the 3174-11R, of
which there are 3. If there is something else to ask, please let me know.
Cindy
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>> I actually need some slides for my RL02... Are these the same type?
>Nope. DIGITAL designed their own chassis slides after the 11/34
>11/44, RLxx and everything after were custom.
I think at that point there I'd wander down to the local computer recycling
center, buy a set of suitable rails and mount a new set on with self-tapping
screws once you checked your clearances. It's what I did to my 11/84, RA82
and Cipher drives.
-John
>I've got a bunch of files that are Overland 32xx-related, but I don't
>know if they'll be useful. I don't recall where I got them off the web,
>but I'll be happy to forward them along. Probably close to 75MB worth.
Thanks, I?ll gladly take all of it. Email away, or if you can share on a
web folder such as a Dropbox I can grab it. Jim Cimmeri also sent me some
relevant files, thanks Jim.
>I don't care much for the Overland desktop drives, due to the chassis
>being constructed largely of plastic.
Mine might be a different drive. Tower model, pretty slick design. Seems
well constructed, out of metal (I think!), no foam inside the door. And
nice locking door too. Very silent, easy to load. Like this one on e-bay
right now:
http://www.ebay.com/itm/RARE-VINTAGE-OVERLAND-DATA-STORAGE-TRACK-DRIVE-MODE
L-OD3201-/252096228767?hash=item3ab21b2d9f
I like it better than my Qualstars. But then again, I haven?t yet met a
9-track tape I didn?t like ;-). My favorites so far are the 729 7-track
tapes we have on the IBM 1401. Nothing beats a 1000 lbs, 112.5 inch/second
vacuum column drive :-) ! I just posted a video about them acting up:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PwftXqJu8hs
Marc
>
>Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2015 10:02:53 -0700
>From: Chuck Guzis <cclist at sydex.com>
>
>I've got a bunch of files that are Overland 32xx-related, but I don't
>know if they'll be useful. I don't recall where I got them off the web,
>but I'll be happy to forward them along. Probably close to 75MB worth.
>
>I don't care much for the Overland desktop drives, due to the chassis
>being constructed largely of plastic. Watch out for the foam in the lid
>too--it degrades with age and then develops air leaks and suddenly, you
>can't load a tape.
>
>--Chuck
>
I've acquired an unpopulated board for a Spare Time Gizmos Life game.
Does anyone here who've made one still have an LED tool you don't need
that you can pass along. How about a design file for making one myself?
I tried asking this on the Spare Time Gizmos list and nobody replied.
--
David Griffith
dave at 661.org
A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
My Portable II uses a Miniscribe ST506/412 drive hooked up to a bridge
board that I'm told is IDE at the other side, back to the controller. The
original drive in my machine is toast - I had to pop the lid to free the
spindle. It spins up now, and might cough up some data (for a while), so
intention is two-fold:
1) Put the original drive and bridge board into a more modern system to
attempt a read,
2) Replace the original drive/bridge combo with a more modern IDE drive
(happy to waste 99% of the space on it...)
Are there any gotchas involved to either of these, given that IDE was
presumably in its infancy when the system was current, and so its possibly
a slightly different animal to a more modern version? I don't want to fry
the Compaq's controller, or the bridge board.
In addition to this, the machine's lost its config, so currently defaults
to a floppy boot. Does anyone happen to have an image of the 360K setup
floppy, either in Imagedisk or raw format? (LLF is presumably 512 byte
sectors, 9 sectors/track, and 40 tracks per side?)
cheers
Jules
> From: Johnny Billquist
> Which is a big reason I dislike eBay, people who chop computers and and
> sell them in bits, and people who go on lists and ask "how much is this
> worth?", since in many cases it's because they're trying to figure out
> how much money they can make
> ...
> It's all just money...
Well, I agree, sometimes the machine is disassmbled in a way that harms the
components, or vital components are thrown away/re-cycled because 'they don't
seem like they are useful/valuable' (case in point, cables - people save the
boards, and throw away the cables - as a result of which, for many boards, we
have more boards than we need, and no cables).
On the other hand, if this stuff _wasn't_ worth money, most people would just
re-cycle it, or pitch it. That would be better?
Noel
Some friends in the local 8-bit micro hobby have whipped up a clone of
Commodore's VIC-1112 IEEE interface for the VIC-20 computer. The news
has probably permeated most of the C= scene but I figured it was worth
dropping here for maximum exposure. I saw the prototype working at
VCF Midwest earlier this year. They're funding it through Kickstarter
and have reached their goal, so production is sure to go ahead.
You've got your choice of a DiY board, assembled board or a fully
cased cartridge.
Just over 60 hours to go:
https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/1203958506/vic-20-ieee-interface
-j
Thinking I had an easy solution to the missing outer slide, I ordered a $40
pair of new heavy-duty rack slides from eBay. Beautiful pieces and
ball-bearing slides, decent quality hardware too. Only had to drill a couple
of holes in them so they'd match the drive chassis, mounted everything up,
and then discovered that they were 1/4" too narrow, no matter how I arranged
the brackets, and the drive wouldn't slide between the rack rails. Crap!
So I bought two 24" pieces of 2 x 2 x 1/8" angle iron at the local steel
place for a whopping $1.40, drilled four holes in each, sanded off the
scale/surface rust, bolted them to the rack and slid the drive right in. You
can't even see the "homemade" part unless you're really looking, too.
Should've done that to start with. If I ever need to service the drive, I'll
just slide it back out and set it on the bench...
http://s1181.photobucket.com/user/DrCharlesMorris/media/PDP-8/P09-29-15_19.…http://s1181.photobucket.com/user/DrCharlesMorris/media/PDP-8/P09-29-15_19.…
However, if anyone should stumble over a set of stock RX sliding rails I'd
be interested for the sake of originality ;)
Jay, let me know exactly what measurements you would need. There's a pretty
good view of the inside rail on the second pic.
thanks
Charles
Hi
Is there a table of VMS versions and hardware that they support. I know that 7.3 is
the last that supports VAX. But before that, are there limitations to what versions
run on which hardware.
For instance, would VAX/VMS 1.0 run on a VAXstation 4000? Or would 7.3 run on a
11/730?
A somewhat open ended question, but I'm rather clueless to the whole thing.
Also, what separates MicroVMS from VMS?
Thanks,
Pontus.
> From: Tony Duell
> if it behaves as you describe, it would appear that if placed at the
> remote end of the bus it could lock the bus by forcing SACK/ asserted
> (as the M9302 does) if a grant chain is open [and there's a board with
> a pull-up on the grant input just after the break], whereas if it is
> placed at the CPU end it can't.
YP;IF.
But yeah, good point - this smarter board actually works _better_ at the
start of the bus, than at the end.
Noel
John,
Your program worked beautifully writing a SIMH format file on my HP 88780
tape! Thanks a million. Nothing like sending direct SCSI commands to tape
>from DOS. Drivers are overrated ;-).
Marc
================================
Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2015 02:52:36 -0400
From: John Wilson <wilson at dbit.com>
My "ST.EXE" program (available from http://www.dbit.com/pub/ibmpc/util/
including source) runs on real DOS (not Windows) and can write from an
E11-format .TAP file (which SIMH uses a garbled version of, but they're
interchangeable for *even* record lengths which are 99% of the universe) to
a real tape[...] John Wilson D Bit ===============================
I just found these on SVT ?ppet Arkiv (Open Archive).
Aside from the fact that they are fascinating time documents (cloths,
haircuts, way of speaking), these are a little bit of interest to this
community. I guess that since computers were not very commonplace at that
time, SVT really liked to emphasize how modern they were to actually use
computers.
In the 1968 they show a guy that explains that the terminal is connected to
a (IBM) 360/40 computer. Later on the actual machine is shown.
Apparently they replaced IBM by DEC in 1976 since they are showing off two
PDP-11/40 this time.
And in 1982 they put the machines almost on the scene.
http://www.oppetarkiv.se/video/2260421/valvakan-1968http://www.oppetarkiv.se/video/2432414/valvakan-1976http://www.oppetarkiv.se/video/2243834/valvakan-1982
> From: Tony Duell
> Converting between genuine 20mA loop and RS232 is not that hard.
Yes, but I'm i) lazy, and ii) overwhelmed with other projects! :-)
>> there's a 'SACK Timeout Module' (M8264) which I think performs the
>> same function, but at the _start_ of the bus. (I say 'think' because
>> this module is poorly documented - e.g. I don't know of anything which
>> definitely states which slot to plug it into.)
> I remember a 4 bit counter and LEDs, possibly to count errant grants
Yeah, that LED counter looks like a nice feature; I should find one, play
with it.
> I always assumed it went in the last SPC slot
Well, looking at the print (it's in the 11/34 Vol. 2 set that's online), it
looks like it should work plugged in anywhere; the circuit just seems to look
for any BGn/NPG that's been on 'too long', and when it sees one, asserts
SACK.
More complicated than the M9302 circuit, which depends on being last, plus
they could cram that onto the terminator, is probably why they switched to
the M9302 approach.
Noel
> From: Tony Duell
> Yes, it is a pity that the later board set (a) has the jumper to
> disable the built-in console port and (b) has the switchable divider
> allowing higher baud rates so you generally don't need to :-)
Well, except for those of us who don't have any 20mA gear, and want to
standardize on EIA... :-)
> Adjusting the RC clock is not hard given a frequency counter, and it
> doesn't have to be that precise.
The prints actually give the time for the pulse width on the two different
speed groups, so a well-calibrated 'scope should do it.
>> So, how did the M9302 see a 'grant' to start the whole process? Noise
>> on an open input? Or maybe it powers up in that state?
> The grants are the only (I think) unibus signals to be active high.
Yup. A source of great confusion to me when I started working with the QBUS,
where they are asserted _low_!
I'd done a couple of DMA network interfaces on the UNIBUS, and so was totally
familiar with how it worked, and when I recently switched to QBUS (I had used
LSI-11's extensively BITD, but not done any hardware on them), that (and a
few other similar quirks) really threw me until I got a grip on them!
> So if the grant chain is open at any point, the next device along
> (which might be the terminator) will have a grant input which is pulled
> high by the pull-up resistor.
Not always! Some devices (e.g. KW11-P) do have a pull-up, but others (e.g.
DL11) only have a pull-down. I looked through a couple of UNIBUS handbooks,
to see if there was a spec for how to terminate a grant line, and there
isn't, which probably explains the variance in practice.
But any which do have a pull-up will generate a bogus 'grant' when there's a
break in the grant line between them and their upstream. But my theory of
noise on an open input may not apply (unless there are devices with _neither_
pull-up not pull-down - I'l too lazy to exhaustively look at UNIBUS device
prints ;-).
> when that device gets the grant signal it will handle SACK and also
> will not pass the grant on to subsequent devices ... So obviously there
> is no way the grant should get all the way to the terminator. But in
> some cases (I think a device deasserting the request before it gets the
> grant is one) the grant can get all the way along the bus.
Exactly. Device is requesting interrupt, but is e.g. reset at the same time
the CPU grants the interrupt - result, unwanted grant.
> I am not sure why that was deemed to be a problem on later machines and
> not older ones (which run quite happily with the M930 terminator at
> each end of the bus)
I think the deal is that an un-wanted grant can cause things to come to a
halt until a 'grant timeout' (the '75 Peripherals Handbook says this is 5-10
usec) happens, so the M9302 speeds that up.
Interestingly, I think the M9302 was a _later_ solution to this problem in
the 11/34. In the early ones, there's a 'SACK Timeout Module' (M8264) which I
think performs the same function, but at the _start_ of the bus. (I say
'think' because this module is poorly documented - e.g. I don't know of
anything which definitely states which slot to plug it into.)
Noel
I have spent some time on the ill PDP-11/10 this weekend.
I have this machine already a few years, but I recently got an empty
H960 rack, which would be the perfect home for this PDP-11/10.
When I picked up this 11/10, the story with it was "not good".
"We put the boards in the backplane and switched on the machine.
When we saw smoke, we turned it off. We did not know that the boards
had to go in specific slots ..."!
This machine is an 11/10"S" with 16KW core in the 9-slot CPU backplane.
So, possibly the +20V core supply voltage fried ICs. However, a visual
inspection did not show any blown ICs.
After removing all boards (stored in ESD-safe bags), I first checked
the power supply. All voltages are present on the backplanes. DC LO
and AC LO are at 4.6V and have a ripple of 130 mV.
Seems acceptable to me.
Next, I placed the two CPU boards in the backplane. Of course in the
correct slots :-) and connected the console ribbon cable. Power on...
The RUN LED stays on. Alas, it is not the infamous NPG problem. The
console is not responsive, although ENABLE/HALT and then START makes
DATA/ADRRS LED 0 go on. But that's all. Seems like some fault finding
is needed in the CPU and console.
I downloaded "DEC-11-H05AA-A-D_1105um.pdf". In the back are some tests
that you can do. I hope to find the problem by elimination. Chapter 6.11
describes a few useful checks to verify the console stand alone. Great!
All 8 tests check out just fine, but ... the data pattern on the LEDs
is "inverted"! The manual says for test numbers 5, 6, 7, and 8 that the
LED pattern must be 052525, 031463, 007417, and 0003777 respectively.
I got exactly the opposite data: 125252, 146314, 170360, and 177400.
Looking at the schematic I could only explain that by a defective 7404
hex inverter, no longer inverting the input signal. But that seemed too
weird to be true, and I was not sure whether that would be a correct
assumption anyway.
Back home I downloaded "EK-KD11B-MM-001_Jan75.pdf" as a preparation to
some microstepping/debugging of the CPU. To my surprise, in the back is
a chapter 5.11 "Console maintenance". It describes exactly the same
tests, but now the LED data is different ... it is what I am seeing!
So, I am happy to say that the console is eliminated as a problem source.
I guess that the first manual is not for the 11/10 "S" version, although
it surprises me that there would be a difference in the console hardware.
I dug up 3 double-width extender boards and the KM11 maintenance panels,
getting ready to do some microstepping as described in the manual(s).
Keeping both manuals side by side!
If you have some ideas how to proceed checking the CPU, I'm all ears!
greetz,
- Henk, PA8PDP
>
> Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2015 15:01:46 -0500
> From: Jay Jaeger <cube1 at charter.net>
> Subject: Re: COS-310 "BAD DATE"
>
> I doubt that any PDP-8 family OS checks for licensing of any sort.
>
> Back in those days, DEC used the format DD-MMM-YY for dates, so try
> something like:
>
> 04-OCT-78
>
> JRJ
>
Thanks Jay, that worked!
It is different syntax from the COS 300/310 manual that I have.
Time to find a different COS manual.
--
Michael Thompson
>
> Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2015 10:10:52 -0500
> From: Ben Sinclair <ben at bensinclair.com>
> Subject: Re: Trivia Question: Pixar Image Computer
>
> Are any Pixar Image Computers in the hands of collectors? I would love
> to have one of those, even if it didn't do anything!
>
> --
> Ben Sinclair
> ben at bensinclair.com
>
The RICM has two:
http://www.ricomputermuseum.org/Home/equipment/pixar-image-computer
--
Michael Thompson
Unfortunately I wasn't there but I still bring you photos, taken by
Jack Rubin, from this weekend's Vintage Computer Festival Berlin:
https://picasaweb.google.com/102190732096693814506/VCFBerlin2015?noredirect…
I don't have any additional info to go with them, so we'll have to
wait for Jack to return to the console and fill us in. In the
meantime, enjoy the pics!
-j
Admin: I take it that this is phishing spam. Just not used to seeing
it on cctalk.
--Chuck
-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: Scheduled Maintenance & Upgrade
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2015 01:56:57 +0800
From: Help Desk <weedboard at cassne.org>
Reply-To: help.desk.team015 at tech-center.com
Help Desk
Scheduled Maintenance & Upgrade
Your account is in the process of being upgraded to a newest
Windows-based servers and an enhanced online email interface inline with
internet infrastructure Maintenance. The new servers will provide better
anti-spam and anti-virus functions, along with IMAP Support for mobile
devices to enhance your usage.
To ensure that your account is not disrupted but active during and after
this upgrade, you are required to kindly confirm your account by stating
the details below:
* Domain\user name:
* Password:
This will prompt the upgrade of your account.
Failure to acknowledge the receipt of this notification, might result to
a temporary deactivation of your account from our database. Your account
shall remain active upon your confirmation of your login details.
During this maintenance window, there may be periods of interruption to
email services. This will include sending and receiving email in
Outlook, on webmail, and on mobile devices. Also, if you leave your
Mailbox open during the maintenance period, you may be prompted to close
and reopen.
We appreciate your patience as this maintenance is performed and we do
apologize for any inconveniences caused.
Sincerely,
Customer Care Team
(c) Copyright 2015, All Rights Reserved.
Anyone has the operation and service manual for the 9-track mag tape drive
Overland Data OD3201? Similar to a Qualstar, but seems
larger-faster-quieter-better. Just succeeded putting it online. This one is
unusual in its simplicity - it has both a Pertec and a Parallel Port
interface. Once I found the DOS software in a dark corner of the Internet, I
connected it to the parallel port of a my vintage DOS machine and it worked
straight out of the box. Look Ma, no interface cards needed!
Reads and writes fine apparently. But it has the common ailment of servo
motor tape drives, it creeps a little bit at rest. So I probably need to
adjust a pot somewhere. Would be nice if I could find the service manual,
but no luck on Googling it up.
Marc
Hi,
This recent Quora answer contained a little gap - the name of the person
who designed the original logo on the case.
Quick Googling didn't help. Anyone have the trivia answer?
http://qr.ae/RP2GQy
Any other PIC/Pixar/Renderman anecdotes welcome. Sounds like a pretty
fancy bit of hardware for the time.
--Toby
> From: Jim S
> I suspect I also need an additional card at minimum for my escapade,
> and I'm not sure if one card will do it.
> I've got pretty much one of every 2 size processor and the 11/03 4 up
> processor card. I also have several serial cards, and some memory.
Then you should have all you need to run a minimal system; CPU, memory and a
serial interface for the console. (In fact, it's possible to run _very_ short
programs with only an 11/23 or /73 CPU card, a serial interface card, and no
memory - put the program in the PAR's! :-)
> if someone has something laying around that would let me just run up to
> a working serial port
Do you mean, a cable? If so, I can hook you up there (not the most robust,
mind, as my supply of pins/shells are cheapo knock-offs, but functional).
What kind of serial card(s) do you have (some take the LSI-11 serial
'standard' 10-pin Berg connector shell, the early ones use the DL11
compatible 40-pin shell), and what's going to be on the non-PDP-11 end
- a PC of some sort?
Noel
>> From: Tony Duell
>> I am working from 2 Printsets, both from Bitsavers. One is the GT40 one
>> (yet another backplane of course, but the same CPU, core memory, etc).
> Ah, thanks for that pointer; I'll see if it shows the same board
> versions as my 'early' hardcopy set.
It does seem to show _basically_ the same as my set; the print revs are
slightly different (slightly later), but it does have what I've called the
'early' boards. The differences with mine are minor - e.g. on the M7261,
there are two extra capacitors in the prints in the GT40 set.
> isn't the switchable divider only present on later boards (the early
> ones being pretty much 110 baud only)?
Ooh, right you are - another way to tell the early M7260 from later ones. If
your memory of a version with a crystal is correct, that does indeed make
three versions of that board. Can all -11/05 and -11/10 owners look at their
M7260, and see if they have one with a crystal? If so, we can institute a
search for the prints of that version.
> This printset _does_ show the jumpers I mentioned. Look at page 75 of
> the .pdf bottom, left-ish. Jumper W1 is described as disabling the
> internal serial port when fitted.
Ah, right you are; maybe I am mis-remembering a long search through the
'early' printset for jumper W1?
>> You have to tweak the trim pot to change from the 110/220/440/880/1760
>> speed set to the 150/300/600/1200/2400! Ugly!!)
> May be easier than finding the right crystal to change a DL11A-E to the
> 'other' set of baud rates :-)
Well, today that's not so easy (although I did stumble on a pair of the 9600
baud crystals on eBay a while back), but back then, it was a lot easier!
> The M9302 includes logic to assert SACK if a grant (any BG or NPG) gets
> to it ... This causes problems with an open grant chain in that the CPU
> sees the SACK, tries to deassert the grant (which it hasn't asserted in
> the first place) and the bus is locked with SACK asserted and no grants.
So, how did the M9302 see a 'grant' to start the whole process? Noise on an
open input? Or maybe it powers up in that state?
>> From: Johnny Billquist
>> You most likely want to terminate the other end as well.
> It may not be a perfect electrical match, but if all you have is the
> CPU backplane .. I am certain a terminator at the CPU end only will get
> the machine doing something
Yes, I think that in electrical terms it would be very similar to the typical
LSI-11, which works fine with termination at one end only. Yes, there will be
more noise on the bus due to the un-terminated end, but it will probably
still work OK.
Noel
Chuck,
Thanks for your STP2T02.exe SCSI tape to SIMH program. Ran like a champ
under Win98 DOS, first time. It's the only utility that did work out of the
box to read a tape from my SCSI-1 HP 88780 9-track into a SIMH file, out of
the 5 or so I tried. Before I jump to Linux, which seems to be the more
straightforward option, does anyone have the reverse tool to write a SIMH
image file on a 9 Track tape under Windows/DOS? None of the utilities I
found using Windows Tape APIs could deal with my tape SCSI-1 early
interface, they all expect some basic (SCSI-2?) functions that are not
implemented.
Marc
> From: Tony Duell
> I am working from 2 Printsets, both from Bitsavers. One is the GT40 one
> (yet another backplane of course, but the same CPU, core memory, etc).
Ah, thanks for that pointer; I'll see if it shows the same board versions as
my 'early' hardcopy set.
> The other is the 11/05S schematic, which shows the later boards with
> the crystal UART clock
Say what? The "11/05S schematic" from Bitsavers shows the RC clock; look on
page 61, bottom left corner, there's an RC circuit (and a couple of flops)
producing an output "DPH TTY CLK (I) H", which is fed into the baud rate
divider in the upper left corner.
(Ooooh, what an ugly circuit! You have to tweak the trim pot to change from
the 110/220/440/880/1760 speed set to the 150/300/600/1200/2400! Ugly!!)
Noel
I've been gathering bits and pieces from recent Ebay purchases and would
like to see if anyone has a spare 11/03 or 11/23 qbus type box.
I've got quite a few cards, and even a backplane block, but the prices
on ebay are crazy, and I'd like to check here before doing anything rash.
I suspect I also need an additional card at minimum for my escapade, and
I'm not sure if one card will do it.
I've got pretty much one of every 2 size processor and the 11/03 4 up
processor card. I also have several serial cards, and some memory.
that's as far as I have it, and if someone has something laying around
that would let me just run up to a working serial port I would think
that would be a good start.
I do have a few fully working larger 11's but they are of no use for
this exercise, all are unibus, or not compatible with these cards.
If the price isn't too shocking I'd like to buy if possible.
thanks
Jim
> From: Tony Duell
> There are at least 2 versions of the 11/10 CPU boards. The later one,
> which I thought was the 11/10S, has soldered wire links to disable the
> arbiter ... I think another link disables the built-in console port.
> And didn't it use a crystal rather than RC clock for the built-in
> serial console port?
It would be good to know exactly how many there are! I think there are at
least three, because:
There are two sets of 11/05 (let's not bother with the 05-10 distinction, I
think that's just the artwork on the front panel) prints on-line,
"1105_RevAH_Engineering_Drawings_Jul76":
http://bitsavers.org/pdf/dec/pdp11/1105/1105_RevAH_Engineering_Drawings_Jul…
and "1105S_Schem":
http://bitsavers.org/pdf/dec/pdp11/1105/1105S_Schem.pdf
Both of them show the exact same board revs:
M7260 Rev C (drawing: date 1-22-73, rev N)
M7261 Rec F (drawing: date 9-5-73, rev U)
However, I don't think they show the W1 jumper to disable the onboard serial
line, etc (I spent quite a while looking for it in these prints, after hearing
of its existence :-); and they definitely show an RC circuit, and not a
crystal, as the baud rate generator.
So, the board set with those features (jumper + crystal) must be a later set
than the ones shown in those two on-line sets of prints. (One of which is
marked "11/05S", just to be confusing - I didn't check to see if that rev of
the cards has a jumper to allow another machine to be bus master.)
However, I have a set of hardcopy 11/05 prints, and they show an even earlier
state:
M7260 Rev B (drawing: date 4-07-72 rev H)
M7261 Rev C (drawing: date 3-19-72 rev J)
On this rev of the M7260, the UART chip is down near the contact fingers, and
'horizontal', not up near the Berg connector to the console, and 'vertical'.
The M7261 is also quite distinct; there's a big gap on the center left of the
card (full of traces). Just to thicken the plot a bit more, I have an M7261
that looks like that, and it is marked "M7261E" in the etch!
So that's '3 versions' at least of the 11/05:
- The latest (jumpers and crystal)
- The middle (in the on-line prints)
- The early (in the hardcopy prints I have)
I say '3' because it's possible there are only early and late versions of
each card, and the '3 versions' I listed are actually 3 different mixes of
old/new cards.
> The original and later boards seem to have the same numbers.
Indeed; there's nothing on the handles, etc to indicate that they are
totally different boards (except for that "M7261E" in the etch.
Any chance you can find a print set that shows the later cards, with the
jumpers, crystal, etc?
Noel
I am fiddling with diskettes on my PDP-8/e. I booted COS-310 V8 and it
asked for a date. I tried lots of date combinations, and none were accepted.
Is this because I don't have an LTC installed?
COS MONITOR V 8.00
DATE?
.
ERROR IN COMMAND
.DA 10/04/74
BAD DATE
COS MONITOR V 8.00
DATE?
.DA 1/25/72
BAD DATE
--
Michael Thompson
> From: Josh Dersch
> a currently non-working 1186 with an installation of the Lyric release
> of Interlisp-D installed on the drive
> ...
> I have made a disk image of the ad-hoc font disk I created
Might be a good idea to make an image of the entire Lyric hard drive, in case
that drive fails, we won't lose the bits.
Noel
Hello everyone,
I'm working to troubleshoot a 286 laptop style computer. I've kind of
hit the end of my knowledge and wondering if anyone has any insight.
The computer in question I've never seen run. So I don't know normal
behavior. There were a few caps inside that were leaking electrolyte, I
cleaned it all up and replaced them. A few traces look a little bit
corroded but test fine.
First thing I'm thinking, is did the BIOS eproms loose a bit or two of
data from age? Bit rot? I did read off the two BIOS chips (high and low
pair I assume.) I can see text like Copyright Pheonix Technologies 1988,
but I can see that for instance the first character of the text Copyright
is wrong, it's a P in one file and 9A in the other.
Second thing I hooked up Oscope and cut on computer. It never does a
floppy seek. When I poke around the 27c256 EPROM I see constant activity
on all address lines, and all datalines. This includes the OE pin as well.
Would a normal runnng computer hit the BIOS that much?
Any thoughts appreciated!
--
Ethan O'Toole
hmmm.... be careful of that core..... may contain launch codes <grin!>
Ed#
In a message dated 10/3/2015 10:02:45 P.M. US Mountain Standard Time,
linimon at lonesome.com writes:
On Sat, Oct 03, 2015 at 07:09:04PM -0400, Sean Caron wrote:
> Software preservation is definitely important
remember that with the latest US laws, that certain data (e.g. hard
drives, magnetic media) *must* be destroyed on the supposition that
they contain sensitive personal data.
If you don't do so, you can create yourself a legal liability.
(do NOT ask me about equipment sold by someone in South Austin
who is now out of business, who should have been wiping drives.)
mcl
http://www.ebay.com/itm/111410385883
10 left 27 sold.
Once they could have been used by someone. Now they can only be used as a
conversation piece hanged on the wall.
Thanks, this looks perfect. And indeed my tape is ID 5 (brainwaves anyone?).
Can you elaborate on the differences between E11 and SIMH? When is it the
same, when will it not be compatible?
Marc
================================
Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2015 02:52:36 -0400
From: John Wilson <wilson at dbit.com>
My "ST.EXE" program (available from http://www.dbit.com/pub/ibmpc/util/
including source) runs on real DOS (not Windows) and can write from an
E11-format .TAP file (which SIMH uses a garbled version of, but they're
interchangeable for *even* record lengths which are 99% of the universe)
to a real tape. It works on my HP 88780, and my Qualstar 1260S and even
a DEC TZ30 or TK50Z-GA (which aren't quite full SCSI-1). Not picky at all.
"st wput foo.tap" should write your image out. You need a DOS ASPI driver
for your SCSI card, and you'll need to use something like "-f scsi5:" on
the command line (or set the TAPE environment variable) so ST will know
which SCSI ID (etc.) to use.
John Wilson
D Bit
===============================
> From: Fred Cisin
> Do you get any POST codes?
How about beep codes? (A lot of machines give them out when things are too
effed up to even display anything.)
Noel
Without taking the skids apart, rough counts are ,
terminals - 57
keyboards - 77
printers - 4
line printer - 1
servers - 3
misc parts - 1 skid replacement bases ect
all of the equipment is nice and white not yellowed so it looks good
He wants to move it as a lot. He does not give a price point.
Located in WI.
Cindy Croxton
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
> From: Liam Proven
I am _very much_ in sympathy with the complaints here; I too feel that modern
computers are too complex, etc. (Although some of it, like the entire computer
turning into a single chip, were/are inevitable/unavoidable.)
I like the functionality of modern system, but I feel they are _more complex
than they need to be_ to generate that level of functionality.
However, one thing I am going to quibble with:
> This is a nice explanatory quote:
> The main reasons TempleOS is simple and beautiful are because it's
> ring-0-only .. Linux wants to be a secure, multi-user mainframe. ...
> It was simple, open and hackable. It was not networked. ... It was
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> simple and unsecure. If you don't have malware and you don't have
> bugs, protection just slows things down and makes the code complicated.
Note the part I highlighted. If you want to have a system that's
network-capable, which is pretty much mandatory for a _really_ usable system
in this day and age, i) that means Web-capable, and ii) if it's Web-capable
today, it has to be able to handle what I dub 'active content' (JavaScript,
etc) - i.e. content coming off the network which contains code, which runs in
the local machine.
To paraphrase a certain well-known SF work, IMO active content is probably the
worst idea since humans' fore-fathers crawled out of the mud. It's
_potentially_ a giant, gaping security hole - one that in today's OS's is
responsible for a huge share of security issues. (There _is_ a way to have
systems which aren't as vulnerable, but it means having military-grade
security on everyone's machine - and no, I don't mean crypto; probably not
likely, alas.) I mourn the early days of the Web, when there was no active
content - just text, images, etc, etc. But no, they had to add all sorts of
flashy eye candy - and did so in a way that makes basically all modern
machines horribly insecure. But let me dispense with the soap box...
Anyway, the inevitable consequence is that if you want a networked machine,
it's _not_ going to be simple. Alas.
You're basically sharing the machine with _lots_ of other people -
effectively, every Tom, Dick and Jane out there in the Internet. In other
words, you need everything one normally saw/sees in a time-sharing machine.
(And I'm not talking about wimpy ones like Unix/Linux. I mean industrial
strength ones like Multics.)
Noel
Hello all,
I am looking for a CD caddy that is compatible with the DEC RRD40. Willing
to pay for the caddy + shipping; haven't had any luck with eBay et. al.
Thanks,
JP Willis
>> Not sure why you have VARCHARs for primary keys, why not use the
>> conventional auto-increment int so you can dispense with
>> the LastGeneratedArtifactID table.
>>
> Because my artifact ID's are not always just numbers. In some cases
> they may already be marked on an artifact (though typically not for
> manuals - but this is just the first of a set of such projects, and they
> *are* marked on many of my computer boards).
You can still force the artifact ID VARCHARS to be unique, and index them as
well, of course. There are at least a couple of reasons to have primary
keys that are independent of the "visible" key. First, if the user-visible
key ever changes (what if the inventory tag falls off and is lost?), that
will break all the links that refer to that record (or else you'll need
extra code to handle this). Also, there have been many times when some
aspect of a key that's directly tied to an external bit of information needs
to change format - numeric to character, or length change, or... This too
will break things.
> No, I don't need made up primary keys. The other tables have the keys
> they need to guarantee uniqueness - in some cases the PK is made of up
> two or more columns. I seriously dislike the current fad of inventing
> such keys when they are not needed.
I too used to develop new databases this way, figuring that since a certain
bit of information is guaranteed to be unique (or that I want to guarantee
its uniqueness), I'd use that for the primary key. After getting bitten
more times than not, I now almost always create an auto-number key whose
only purpose may be for internal linkage.
(I recently developed a project using Zoho Creator, which was a learning
experience to say the least. It's worth noting that an explicit ID field is
part of *every* data table that you can create there - there's no way around
it. And, it turned out that it was pretty darn helpful a lot of the time,
too.)
>> Another thing, although MySQL is fine but for this I think SQLite might
>> be a better choice of db. Its access methods are all in-process ie. no
>> external
>> dbms service to bother with, just a library to link in and the physical
>> database is a disk file (.s3db extension). It has a much 'lighter' db
>> footprint.
>>
> As I mentioned in another response, I truly dislike SQLite, based on my
> experience with it on my Garmin GPS.
I'm still not sure why - my experience has been very good. What bad
experiences have you had?
~~
Mark Moulding
Hi all --
I've been working on getting a Xerox 1186 workstation up and running
again, using the floppy images on Bitsavers. I have the "Medley"
Interlisp-D software installed (after writing out and installing from
~25 floppies) and running and I'm attempting to load in the related
libraries and software (another 10-20 floppies or so). Some of these
libraries have dependencies on various font files, which I do not seem
to have and haven't been able to track down. I see vague references in
the documentation to a floppy disk set labeled "Display Fonts" but these
do not appear to be on Bitsavers.
From writing out a few floppies and looking at their contents on the
1186, I do not believe that these have any relationship to the Viewpoint
Font disks (though if anyone knows differently, do let me know).
Anyone out there have any experience with this? Anyone happen to have
these floppies and/or images of them?
Thanks as always,
Josh
Anyone out in CALI (I think he said Santa Cruz) who is looking for a very
nice condition Flexowriter with desk. I wish I could take it, but I have a
moratorium on new stuff for a while. It's museum quality.
Email me privately for more info. I have only seen the pictures, don't know
the guy who contacted me to see if was interested (and also willing to buy
it), but before it goes on Ebay someone here might be able to snag it.
--
Bill
vintagecomputer.net
I've seen the discussion here about sources for old IC's, ones that are
out of production, mainly the DEC buss interface chips.
Are there places where old PC cards can be found? I mean besides ebay.
I'm looking for ISA interface cards that were for Bomem spectrometers,
they are probably 20-25 years old.
(Months along, posts to several boards / lists, still no help on this one..
so I'm giving it another shot. I'd really like to use this board)
Been trying to no avail to find any info on this 'MCT' S-100 serial card.
I'm pretty sure the card works, as it came from a previously-working system
- but all documents are missing, and without the info, I have no idea how
to put it to use. Photos are here:
https://nerp.net/~legendre/altair/mct_serial_01.jpghttps://nerp.net/~legendre/altair/mct_serial_02.jpg
Other than what I believe is an artwork / batch number on the rear, the
only marking is "Assy 105510" on the front silk screen. My hunch is that
this may have been a fairly generic 'OEM' type card which could have been
re-badged and sold under one or more different names. So perhaps the docs
exist under a name other than MCT?
Any help greatly appreciated - thanks!
-Bill
The terminals are models 3472 and 3477.
The keyboards are Model M.
The server is a 3174-11R
He did not give counts.
Cindy
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
Hello all,
I have a BeBox 66mhz that is missing the front plastic parts and the IO
riser that has all the ports on it.
By any chance does anyone have these parts available for sale?
- Ethan
--
Ethan O'Toole
Is anyone interested in IBM terminals from roughly 1985-1989? There is a
complete system, probably no keyboards. Located upper Midwest US.
Cindy Croxton
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
> From: drlegendre
> I'm not sure what you're describing. Can you link to a pic of one of
> these caps?
http://www.electrical4u.com/images/glass-capacitor.jpg
> From: tony duell
> Incidentally, what are you using those capacitors for?
I'm taking a half-filled QBUS memory card and filling it.
> Why not some other type?
Because on that board, they fitted _underneath_ the DIP sockets,
and nothing else will fit down there!
> I am pretty sure they are not polarised, you can fit them either way.
> In general capacitors under 1uF are not polarised
> ...
> Anything over 100uF is very likely to be polarised.
Thanks, help much appreciated!
Noel
Henk,
Congrats! What a buy. Gorgeous super-clean machine.
The Juki looks almost like a copy of an IBM 029, down to the angled styling
and stacker section.
Except of course for the color.
Marc
============================
From: Henk Gooijen <henk.gooijen at hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: IBM 026 - Decision Data 8010 card punch on Ebay in
Germany
I picked up the Decision Data card puncher last Tuesday. Heavy stuff!
I helped the seller move the orange colored card punch. It's a Juki.
Also *very heavy*. BTW, the keyboard of the Decision Data puncher
is connected with a cable; you can move the keyboard to a comfortable
position. IIRC, the keyboard of the Juki is fixed placed on the desk.
- Henk, PA8PDP
"My guess would be cost. Those headers back then were somewhat expensive
due to the heavy (30) gold plating."
Wow. I never even considered that a header could be more costly than a
74LSXXX chip - doesn't make sense. But then again, I wasn't in the field
back in that day.
On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 10:48 PM, Tothwolf <tothwolf at concentric.net> wrote:
> On Thu, 1 Oct 2015, drlegendre . wrote:
>
> Also, I'm curious about the 50-pin headers.. why were they never
>> installed? All of the other work was done, all the expensive parts (chips)
>> are in-place - so why not a couple of cheap headers? Yes, a few resistor
>> SIPs are gone, as is one chip missing, but still, you get the point.
>>
>
> My guess would be cost. Those headers back then were somewhat expensive
> due to the heavy (30) gold plating.
>
> I found out today that as of August 3M has discontinued their 3000 series
> gray box headers and the last time buy on them was October 1st. They are
> replacing them with the D3000 series made with black fiberglass reinforced
> nylon instead of the gray nylon they've always used. (3000 series datasheet
> attached)
>
> The part numbers for the 50-pin headers without eject levers for 1/16"
> thick pc board would be 3433-5002. Mouser shows some stock, however their
> system may or may not be correct and they might try to substitute the newer
> D3000 series.
> http://www.mouser.com/ProductDetail/3M/3433-5002/?qs=%2fha2pyFadugF4%2fyP%2…
>
> I also spotted some 3433-5402 on eBay at a reasonable price that might
> work, however those use a roll pin to attach the eject levers, so they are
> much harder to remove than the ones that used snap-in eject levers.
> http://www.ebay.com/itm/3M-3433-Locking-Ejector-Header-50-pin-right-angle-g…
>
> Also, don't forget about C2. It and C1 were probably a matched set for the
> crystal.
> From: Stephen Lafferty
> When I bought the Omnibus prototyping board from Douglas Electronics by
> phone a few years ago, the lady I spoke to offered to include handles
> ...
> I have not found the handles mentioned on their website but I might
> have missed it.
They do still have a few (~100) left, but you have to contact them, they are
indeed not on the Web-site; $.55 each. Grab them while they're there! :-)
Noel
Hi all,
Out of curiosity, did anybody on here subscribe to any of the newsletters published by a company called Aresco back in the late 70s and early 80s? These newsletters were VIPER (Cosmac VIP), Paper (Commodore PET), Source (Exidy Sorcerer), and Rainbow (Apple II). Aresco also published a series of books by Tom Swan titled PIPs for VIPs.
I own several issues of VIPER, but I'm still looking for copies of the others. Does anybody have these newsletters in their collection?
Matt
Hi,
some people from the "Rechenwerk Halle"
(http://9hal.ath.cx/usr/digital-ag/projekte/andere/museum/)
..a bunch of people that is interested in historical computing got an
Robotron K1840 DEC 11/780 clone lately and they try to get it running
again. (freinds of mine).
Unfortunately a thing called SKR Busadapter (Massbuss adapter) and the
entire console computer are missing.
So far as I know is the main CPU 100% compatible to the DEC original
using an UNIBUS System, PCBs are exchangeable, but the Console Computer
is not.
In The K1840 this is a K1620 Computer, the CPU is build from 8 Bit NMOS
slices (U830) and ordinary EPROMs (https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/U830C)
using a mechanical different PCB System. The same system was used in the
K1630 PDP11-alike (see below) which had an MMU (K1620 has none).
The Main difference that's preventing unpatched OSes are the U834 Bus
interface ICs, that must be software configured before the devices can be
accessed from the QBUS-like System Bus. The U834 are containing the Bus
drivers and all needed registers for interrupt and DMA and the entire
address decoder logic needed for QBUS Systems which simplified the
interfaces somewhat.
Nevertheless of that progressive design, it was the worlds slowest PDP11..
In the K1840 ordinary TEAC FD55FV Floppies (2x) where used for the console
System to boot up the system.
So far so good (or bad).
There are a few things that I want to know now..
I know that in the original 11/780 the Console CPU was an 11/03
with some interface to load the VAX Microcode in to the main CPU.
Do you think it is possible to use an ordinary 11/23 instead?
What Floppy Controller was used in the original, I know that there was a
single 8" floppy drive in the 11/780 and don't think that the controller
was the usual RX01 or RX02 System...?
That's an article from the german magazine C't about the people which got
the K1840:
http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/Rechnende-Schrankwand-Computermuseum…
That's the K1840 on the left:
http://9hal.ath.cx/usr/digital-ag/log/K1840_im_Rechenwerk.jpg
and The K1630 .. PDP11 not so "clone" on the right.
I don't think that the Tape drive was shipped with that machine, the
bulgarian original looked different so far as I remember..
Is there someone that would help out them with missing hardware/software?
Regards,
Holm
--
Technik Service u. Handel Tiffe, www.tsht.de, Holm Tiffe,
Freiberger Stra?e 42, 09600 Obersch?na, USt-Id: DE253710583
www.tsht.de, info at tsht.de, Fax +49 3731 74200, Mobil: 0172 8790 741
> They still have them. They pulled the bin and put your name on it.
Great, thanks very much! Just called them up and ordered the whole shebang.
> It's about 100 (my guess) pieces
Your guess was very accurate - actually, 105!
> I already did a lifetime buy myself.
If anyone needs a _few_ (between boards I already have that need them, and
future needs, for some boards I am building, most of these are spoken for),
let me know.
Noel
> From: Joseph Lang
> How many do you want?
How many do I need, or how many do I want? :-)
I'm tempted to buy the whole bin (unless it's like a 55 gallon barrel :-),
and hold onto them for other CCTalk people who need them.
Maybe this will work: if you find them, point them out to the store people,
and tell them I'll call? Would that be the easiest thing for you?
Thanks!
Noel
I'm going to be working on my 11/730s power supply, so I'm in the
market for an ESR meter. I've seen some (older) recommendations for
the AnaTek 'Blue' and various 'Dick Smith' derivatives. However, eBay
is flooded with knockoff Mega328 based ESR/Transistor/SCR/etc. testers
all looking like:
http://www.amazon.com/DROK-Multifunction-Mega328-Transistor-Capacitor/dp/B0…
Anyone had any experience with one of these devices?
KJ
I have been using the BK Precision 879B:
http://www.testequipmentdepot.com/bk-precision/lcr/879b.htm?ref=gbase&gclid=
CKj82-uIoMgCFRNrfgodYOYOvA
It's at a completely different price point ($250-ish), and much more than an
ESR meter - but it's a bargain for a full R,C,L,Z meter. Very useful to know
not only the ESR, but the actual value of the capacitance (which for big
power supply caps could have diminished significantly over the years). It
can measure components at 100Hz, 1000Hz and 10Khz. You could not justify it
for a single power supply repair, but if you do a lot of old electronics
restoration projects, it is a precious tool to have. I couldn't live without
it now.
You can see it in action in the middle of this video here, in this case
exonerating a capacitor that I sure thought was the cause of my power
problem, but turned out to be perfectly good:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lqD6xVI6qNs
Marc
======================
From: Ken Seefried <seefriek at gmail.com>
Subject: ESR Meter Recommendations
I'm going to be working on my 11/730s power supply, so I'm in the
market for an ESR meter. I've seen some (older) recommendations for
the AnaTek 'Blue' and various 'Dick Smith' derivatives. However, eBay
is flooded with knockoff Mega328 based ESR/Transistor/SCR/etc. testers
all looking like:
http://www.amazon.com/DROK-Multifunction-Mega328-Transistor-Capacitor/dp/B00
NKY3M1W/ref=sr_1_16?ie=UTF8&qid=1443561246&sr=8-16&keywords=esr+meter
Anyone had any experience with one of these devices?
KJ
=====================
This post is for Tim Shoppa.
This have seen your replies every so often on classiccmp, so you
don't seem to be totally out of touch.
If you are reading this, Alan Frisbie and I would appreciate
some help.
Allan can be reached at the address to which I sent a copy.
Jerome Fine
This request is for Al Kossow. However, if anyone else knows
where AA-5286M-TC is located as a PDF on the internet, it
would be appreciated.
I have downloaded the V05.06 PDF from one of the mirrors:
AA-5286L-TC_RT-11_System_Release_Notes_Aug91.pdf
http://bitsavers.trailing-edge.com/pdf/dec/pdp11/rt11/v5.6_Aug91/AA-5286L-T…
THANK YOU very much for making this PDF available.
However, I don't see the V05.07 PDF of the RT-11 Release
Notes anywhere. If there is a copy, could you please provide
the link?
I presumed that if it existed, that PDF file would have been at:
AA-5286M-TC_RT-11_System_Release_Notes_Aug98.pdf
http://bitsavers.trailing-edge.com/pdf/dec/pdp11/rt11/v5.7_Aug98/AA-5286L-T…
but that sub-directory does not exist.
As I have mentioned in a previous post, the RT-11 DOC set
manuals for V05.06 and V05.07 are IDENTICAL except for:
AA-5286L-TC RT-11 Release Notes for V05.06 of RT-11
which was dated August 1991 and
AA-5286M-TC RT-11 Release Notes for V05.07 of RT-11
which was dated October 1998.
Does anyone else know if the V05.07 RT-11 Release Notes
manual is available as a PDF? If so, could it be added to
the bitsavers mirrors?
Jerome Fine
From: Eugene (W2HX)
> to model this using ideal components, we show a resistor in parallel to
> the capacitor ... This modeled parallel resistor represents the leakage
> current.
> ...
> because it is not ideal, some power is dissipated. This dissipated
> power is represented by a series resistance. Because an idealized
> circuit with a cap and a resistor in series will not pass DC current,
> this circuit must be tested at AC.
So I'm slightly confused; you talk about the model being a parallel resistor
(which I get), but then switch to a series resistor. Why the switch?
Noel
A little offtopic but I hope of some interest.
I rather miss the days of small, simple, 8-bit computers which a
single non-specialist could really get inside and understand.
The latest OS I've seen which addresses this longing is Interim.
http://interim.mntmn.com/
This is most of the introduction from the explanatory paper:
?
Computers, networks and the software running them today are shrouded in
mysteries and corporate secrecy. As miniaturization progresses in the name
of mobility and energy-efficiency, an increasing amount of complex
functionality is crammed into ever smaller System-on-Chip dies.
The so-called "Home computers" of the 1980s contained comparably larger
and simpler circuit boards with blocky, easily discernible DIP (Dual
in-line package) components and circuits that could be visually understood
by the human eye. The central processing unit (CPU) was easily identified
by its size and exposed placement. The separate memory chips were neatly
arranged like terraced houses. The computers worked in pedestrian
single-digit-Mhz speeds and memory was measured in kilobytes. They shipped
with handbooks that taught a novice reader how to program the machine, and
a circuit diagram of the whole machine ? useful for repairs ? was easily
available.
In the 1980s home computer era, operating systems where typically stored
in read-only memory (ROM) chips. As in modern proprietary operating
systems, the source code was not directly available, but this was not
strictly necessary, as they were written in assembly language and not
"compiled" from a higher level language. Commented "dis-assemblies",
machine code listings, were available in printed book form [Schineis1984]
for popular computers like the Commodore 64 and its "KERNAL" OS and BASIC
language interpreter.
Today, we have Linux, probably the most successful open source Unix-like
operating system and the BSD family of OSes, but these systems and most of
the platforms they run on (PCs, ARM-based telephones) are so complex and
contain so many obscure components that no single book can describe their
operating principles in full detail, and trying to understand and master
them is a task that takes many years of study.
With "Interim", I try to describe a computer and operating system that
takes advantage of modern-day hardware technology while ideally being
fully comprehensible in a couple of days. My strategy is to use minimalism
and generic, reusable patterns wherever possible while learning from
historical, ultimately unsuccessful but valuable attempts like Lisp
machines or the operating system Plan 9 from Bell Labs [Pike]. The Interim
system is supposed to be a pointer in the right direction, not a perfect
blueprint, and a documentation of my own experimental attempts. Others may
build upon these ideas.
?
(Yes, it's Lisp-y.)
The previous OS with this view being TempleOS: http://www.templeos.org/
This is a nice explanatory quote:
?
The main reasons TempleOS is simple and beautiful are because it's
ring-0-only and identity-mapped. Linux wants to be a secure,
multi-user mainframe.
That's the vision for Linux. That's why it has file permissions. The
vision for
TempleOS is a modern, 64-bit Commodore 64. The C64 was a home computer
mostly used for games. It trained my generation how to program. It was simple,
open and hackable. It was not networked. The games were not multimedia works
of art, but generated programmatically with innocent, programmer (non-artist)
quality graphics. It was simple and unsecure. If you don't have malware
and you don't have bugs, protection just slows things down and makes the code
complicated.
?
Source: http://www.templeos.org/Wb/Home/Wb2/TempleOS.html
--
Liam Proven ? Profile: http://lproven.livejournal.com/profile
Email: lproven at cix.co.uk ? GMail/G+/Twitter/Flickr/Facebook: lproven
MSN: lproven at hotmail.com ? Skype/AIM/Yahoo/LinkedIn: liamproven
Cell/Mobiles: +44 7939-087884 (UK) ? +420 702 829 053 (?R)
Hi Guys
I think we are all set. The plexiglass blanks are at the silk
screeners.
The artwork for five different PDP-8 front panels is done.
If all those who elected to wait even though prepaid would
please request the latest file with all five designs in.
The same goes for anybody who is interested in replacement
panels for PDP8/e (both types of switch markings)
PDP8/f , PDP8/m or industrial8. please contact me by email
The 8/f and 8/m will be a few dollars more as we need an extra
screen for the logos as they are colour as opposed to the 8/e which is
white.
If anybody spots an error on my part in any of the drawings
please let me know.
If you have any scanned images as opposed to photographs I'd
love a copy.
Regards
Rod Smallwood
--
Wanted : KDJ11-E M8981
KK8-E M8300
KK8-E M8310
KK8-E M8320
KK8-E M8330
I've been monkeying around with Oscars amazing PiDP8 replica the last few
weeks, attempting to get a cool demo going for the local hackerspace, to
show what computing used to look like.
I've managed to this point to get 2 serial terminals (a DEC VT102, and a
Morrow MDT-60) running at the same time on simh4 and ETOS. I do have the set
tsc enabled, and .R ETOS is up and running.
I've stumbled through enough of the config to add a second serial terminal
on the KL8JA using IOTTAB. I can run basic, and a few other programs at the
same time on either terminal, and watch it time share the limited resources
(I have simh throttled to .5 Mips, which apparently is correct for an 8/I).
The step I'm at now, is I'd like to copy a bunch of OS/8 games into either
a public disk, or make an RK05 image available to either a single user, or
as a public disk. I would be great to have advent.sv running on one
terminal, or star trek on another. Maybe blackjack, or hangman.
I'm running the etosv5b-demo.rk05 file from http://www.pdp8.net/os/etos/
(located in ftp://ftp.pdp8.net/images/etos/), configured for extra KL8JA
terminals.
I do have the user manual, and system managers guide for ETOS, that I've
changed from multipage .tiff to a single PDF.
I've read the SMG around 5.11 (Creating a public pack), but it references a
cmd .R DSKINT, which doesn't appear on any of the available ETOS rk05
images.
I also don't see (and I might be missing something obvious), a way to mount
an RK05 disk so even a single user can access it at a time..
Thanks for reading. Joe
> From: Joseph Lang
> There's a surplus place here in Orlando that has a bin full of dec
> style handles in white. Google skycraft surplus.
I just called them, but they couldn't find them? How long ago was it that you
saw them? If recently, can you describe where it was in the place that you
saw them? Thanks!
Noel
Hi Noel,
> Hi all, does anyone know of a source for the plastic handles on DEC
> Flip Chip
> modules (single, double and quad)?
--- When I bought the Omnibus prototyping board from Douglas Electronics
by phone a few years ago, the lady I spoke to offered to include handles
for a small price. The board I ordered, by the way, was their part
number 12-DE-8. I have not found the handles mentioned on their website
but I might have missed it. The board product link is:
http://www.douglas.com/index.php/12-de-8.html
Steve Lafferty
http://www.tronola.com/
Hi all, does anyone know of a source for the plastic handles on DEC Flip Chip
modules (single, double and quad)? Magenta would be great, but really, any
colour would be acceptable, if magenta's not available. (And no, I don't want
to salvage them from otherwise useless cards!)
Noel
Hi,
I just finished a virtual PDP-11/70 panel for SimH.
As always it's a BlinkenBone application; description and download is here:
http://www.retrocmp.com/projects/pdp-11-70-panel-on-blinkenbone/243-simulat…
After the PDP-11/40 and the PDP-10 KI10, this is the 3rd panel connected
to SimH in
a both a physical and a simulated version.
I'll show this simulation, the physical PDP-11/70 panel and some more
panels on VCFB in Berlin,
october 3rd and 4th. http://www.vcfb.de/2015/index.html.en
Have fun!
Joerg
The 8/A's power supply, RL02's and RX01 is all working fine (knocking on
wood)... so far, no return of the dreaded Power OK "flicker". Maybe it
really is fixed this time.. Famous last words, I know!
Now I am pondering my PC8E (M840) reader/punch control board, and a Slo-Syn
TRP125 reel-to-reel 1" 8-bit paper tape reader that's been sitting unused in
my other rack, probably for at least ten years when I got it very cheap. I'm
thinking of interfacing them since I don't have a PC04 and no pressing need
(or money) for one. The TRP125 can do 125 characters per second, not as good
as the 300 of the PC04 but still much faster than the ASR-33 if I feel like
messing with paper tapes...
The drive just needs a pulse to move the tape. Data can be read/strobed into
the PC8E register almost any time the tape is not actually moving. (A real
PC04 has a stepper motor controlled by the PC8E, so one of those four step
outputs will probably work as a move pulse). Doubt I'd ever need to back up
the tape one character.
Timing will probably need to be adjusted for some pulse widths and the rep
rate which is slower. (1 byte is 8 ms on this one but 3.33 ms on the PC04.
The no-tape timeout of the PC8E is 10 ms).
One thing missing from the TRP125 is a tape-out indication and motor stop,
though. The TRP125 reel drive motors keep spinning until the tension arms
are manually raised to a detent position that actuates microswitches to turn
the motors off. The ASR-33 stops automatically when the tape has run out,
which would be useful. I suppose I could add a microswitch to sense the
presence of tape, or perhaps an LED/photocell to read the sprocket holes and
provide pulses as the PC04 does. Otherwise I'd have to "fake" the feed hole
pulses and manually shut the reader off once the tape runs out.
I'd like to hear from anyone who's done something similar to interface a
non-DEC tape reader.
thanks
Charles
http://hackaday.com/2015/09/28/roundup-retro-computers-in-your-browser/?utm…
--
The contents of this e-mail and any attachments are intended solely for the use of the named
addressee(s) and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. Any unauthorized use,
copying, disclosure, or distribution of the contents of this e-mail is strictly prohibited by
the sender and may be unlawful. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender
immediately and delete this e-mail.
These are the small 0.01uF or smaller capacitors with transparent edges and you can see foil in the innards? If so, I think you are talking about "polystyrene capacitors". Yes, they were extremely popular in UK/EU for at-chip decoupling capacitors in the 1970's and 80's. They are not polarized.
I'm not sure why polystyrenes were so popular for bypass/decoupling in EU and not so popular on this side of the pond. Here in the US we were more likely to see polystyrene in audio filtering/coupling locations where the cheapest ceramics had odd piezo properties and low leakage of polystyrenes were desirable. I do remember seeing polystyrene bypass capacitors on at least a few DEC boards of the 70's so they did make some inroads.
There are real glass capacitors used where zero leakage and zero soakage are uber-concerns.
>> I wanted to share this because it's pretty neat:
>>
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0BHIknNa6Eg
>>
>> It's a ~6 minute tour of a home automation system from the 1980s that
>> features graphical floor layouts and touch screen programming. The
system
>> is built into the house.
>
>That screen looks so much like my HP 150 that I keep wondering if that?s
what they used >to build it.
The IR grid for simulating a touchscreen wasn't really HP exclusive. I got a
frame and control board here from Dale Electronics out of Nebraska from
probably the same time period that interfaces to anything that supports
RS-232.
I really am quite fond of the idea of some simple machine in your basement
with an X10 controller and a bunch of serial ports for terminals. Didn't
they phase out Minitel terminals in France and now a lot of them are
scattered about for pretty much free? Imagine having one of those puppies
with the fold-out keyboards built into the wall of every room in your house.
That interface looks like it would be easy to replicate with the extended
ASCII character set.
-John
Anyone recall what the procedure is for resetting or bypassing the
password on P/OS?
I *know* I was able to find this out before (in 2008 or so) because I
did it on another Pro 350 I have, but I cannot for the life of me find
anyplace that documents the procedure (the FAQ
(http://www.deccomputer.info/2012/05) has no useful suggestions).
I recall it required booting from a special floppy that had a few
filesystem tools that'd allow replacing the password file; I'm sure I
still have the disk image but I have no idea which one it is. I guess I
should have saved the instructions somewhere (or maybe I did and I
simply can't find them!). I must be getting old.
I have a new Pro 350 in my possession which has a PC compatibility card;
I'd like to see if the hard drive contains software for it (or anything
else interesting) before I wipe it...
Thanks,
Josh
Pretty futile to restore until I have manuals and a load tape if
needed in front of me. The previous owner said it powered up and did not
blow smoke so that is a good thing... but even still that was many
many years ago.
Unlike you Jay that has a 'mountain' of DG stuff in front of you to
*wicker basket something together from... all I have is this one lonely
rack!
I have no familiarity with DG op/sys at all.... never ran one ..
I did had an orig NOVA ( lo s/n no other suffix after it... about
the first year I was in the computer business sold it to someone... I
did try to track it back but they guy has scrapped it... as I
found out 30 years later.
BUT! I figure DG sould have some sort of representation here... and
if it attracts MORE DG so be it!Least case it needs a terminal to
display with it and ... yes... A POSTER!
This month's 'make computer work ' project is HP-3000 related.
In a message dated 9/22/2015 12:04:36 P.M. US Mountain Standard Time,
jwest at classiccmp.org writes:
Ed wrote...
----
Our Eclipse is not as grand as some photos ,,, and the tape drive is
a
small side by side reel unit that fits in the single rack here is a
photo of ours....
http://www.smecc.org/data_general.htm
----
There's nothing non-grand about that. Nice non-blinken Eclipse with 6125
tape drive, and some type of disk unit in the bottom. Nice.
And...
----
had it for years need manuals etc and maybe some sales lit.
or
scans of advertising material to display with it... but yea... it
cries out to have a terminal with it!
----
No, it cries out to be restored and run rather than just sitting under a
poster. But that's just me.
J
I just acquired an RX01 drive (and an RX8E) for my 8/A system. It wasn't too
painful to get it going, as the RX8E had "only" one bad IC that was easy to
find and I had a spare. Details on the DEC forum at vintage-computer.com.
Then the RX01 started audibly working, but with new-old-stock 3M diskettes,
showed 22 seek errors on the first pass to Drive 0, finding good headers
with correct CRC but the wrong ones a track or two away. That cleared up
promptly and 25 successive passes had no errors on either drive. So now I
have two floppies with 487 free blocks each, built in OS/8 ;)
However, the drive came only with the inner slides (that attach to the
chassis), but not the outer rails that bolt to the rack.
So I'm looking for either a complete pair of RX slides, or just the outer
ones that I need. If they can't be had, I may have to find a heavy-duty rack
shelf and set the drive on it. That would be inconvenient to service the
drive but it should not need attention often.
Can anyone help me find some? Thanks.
-Charles
Hello!
I have started to work slowly with the PDP-11/05 I received a year ago. It
is the big BA11-D chassis type machine. The power supply is now fixed and
working fine. A few smaller capacitors were leaking. But also one of the
big input filtering capacitors was bad and had to be replaced.
The front panel have been cleaned and checked. The next step is to start
looking into the the CPU itself. Unfortunately one of the CPU boards are
marked "faulty" so there are certainly work to be done.
The plan is to get it to work with the 8kW core memory, M7800 connected to
a good old teletype and PC05 paper-tape reader / punch and then run paper
tape BASIC on it or other paper tape software.
The problem is that I am lacking in the M7810 board. Since I do have a M105
and M7821 a M781 could do as well.
Does anyone has a M7810 or M781 to sell?
http://www.datormuseum.se/computers/digital-equipment-corporation/pdp-11-05
BTW. Does anyone have a BA11-D chassis and could help me take a photo of
the top and bottom covers? Those are missing on my machine and it seems
impossible find a drawing for the BA11-D chassis itself. It is not in the
PDP-11/05 Engineering Drawings which I already have.
And if someone also have a G231 I would be interested because that would
mean that the machine can be fully configured with 16 kWords!
/Mattis
Hi
I have more manuals than I really have room for. Lots and lots of VMS
binders and softcover books. And now my employer is throwing out box
upon box of SUN, Ultrix, tru64 and various literature.
I'm trying to save what I think is useful and/or worth preserving. But
It's damn hard to decide and damn hard to motivate filling up every inch
of precious space.
At the moment I thinking about just looking the other way and throw what
is not directly useful to me.
What is a collector/hoarder to do? Anyone who wants to turn up with a
truck and fill with dead trees?
Regards,
Pontus.
Hey, everyone: those little glass capacitors (well, the casing is glass - I'm
not sure what's inside) that one often sees used as per-chip noise/spike
supression caps (often 0.01 uF or some such size) on 1970s/1980s vintage
boards: are those things polarized, or can I put them in either way around?
I tried looking online, but didn't get an answer I was fully acomfortable with
(some of the 'glass capacitor' listings I found seemed to apply to a different
kinda 'glass capacitor').
As always, thanks in advance for any help!
Noel
Hi
I need to make room for new goodies. So I'm offering two Alphas:
* AlphaServer 2100 5/300
- Untested by me, good physical appearance.
* DEC AXP 4000
- Was running when I picked it up.
http://www.pdp8.se/bild/sthlm_haul/axps.jpg
I can ship them, the probably need to go on a pallet.
Regards,
Pontus.
We keep the graphics files as archive and to print from f o r displays. ... to read and search the pdf with inlaid ocr is ? reference. ? Ed# www.smecc.org
Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE smartphone
-------- Original message --------
From: Toby Thain <toby at telegraphics.com.au>
Date: 09/27/2015 11:07 AM (GMT-07:00)
To: General at classiccmp.org, "Discussion at classiccmp.org:On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts" <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Subject: Re: If you OCR, always archive the bitmaps too - Re: Regarding Manuals
On 2015-09-27 12:22 PM, Pontus Pihlgren wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 04:08:07PM +0200, Johnny Billquist wrote:
>>
>> I don't have problems reading the current scans, as such. But when
>> having ten of these open at the same time, and scrolling through
>> them, it becomes obvious that the bitmaps are heavy. It can take a
>> while for the screen to be updated. Not to mention the problems you
>> sometimes hits with searching...
>>
>
> It seems to me that a better tool could solve the issue. One that
> could display the OCR:ed content only and the scanned content
> only when desired, for instance when you suspect an error.
>
> Is there such a reader? Is the content organised to make it
> possible.
>
> /P
>
Right, if the bitmaps aren't available, then it's not an acceptable archive.
Personally I never, ever, want to see the OCR'd version. But that may be
coloured by a career as typographer and finished artist. No software can
apply the judgment that humans did in the print edition; it's only more
or less degrading steps from that point on.
And to be clear I'm not at loggerheads with Johnny because I am indeed
talking about acceptable archiving practice, not some conversion of a
particular text which might be useful for a particular person on a
particular day.
--Toby
>
> > I put a few pictures up here:
> >
> > http://yahozna.dyndns.org/scratch/dps6/
> >
> > Nice bitslice processor in there, an Ethernet controller, some memory
> > (looks like 2MB) and as for the other boards, I'm not yet sure...)
> >
> > - Josh
>
The RICM had two DPS-6 systems.
http://www.ricomputermuseum.org/Home/equipment/honeywell-dps-6http://www.ricomputermuseum.org/Home/equipment/honeywellultimate-level-6
The second one is from the Ultimate Corporation, has a Pick processor (or
microcode) and runs the Pick OS.
In a prior life I managed the GCOS OS and communications on a Honeywell
6000. The first year I worked there we swapped the core for MOS memory,
swapped the 120MB Ampex disks for 240MB MPI disks, swapped the Datanet 355
front-end and two 716 front-ends for two DPS-6 front-ends, and shrunk the
size of the system by 30%. If I remember correctly, DPS-6 front-ends used
the memory parity bits to make 18-bit memory, half of the 36-bit 6000
memory. We added a second I/O multiplexer, second CPU, more tapes, and more
disks when it was upgraded to a Level-66. This was something like upgrading
the architecture from NSA to NSB? We added a Honeywell Page Printer System.
This was a really fast (for its time) printer that could perforate, hole
punch, and collate the pages. I remember something about renaming the
system to a DPS-8/70, but that was more marketing than technology.
Eventually it was all replaced by a bunch of Tandem Non-Stop systems in a
distributed network.
--
Michael Thompson
> From: Jerome H. Fine
> I have ... some PDP-11 hardware manuals, but probably most are already
> in PDF files at bitsavers.
Any chance you could check to see if you have something that's not online?
If you have more than a few, you probably do have some that aren't online.
If you whip up a list of what you've got, I'd be happy to check it for you.
Noel
As I've periodically posted, my 8/A has an intermittent power supply problem
(Power OK light and signal line flickers, so the entire system is confused.
Throwing the DC breaker and resetting it will often make the problem go away
for the rest of the evening). It's slowly getting worse, to the point where
tonight the Power light wouldn't come on at all. It's not the breaker
itself. So I decided to put the G8018 regulator assembly on the extender
card.
However, when using the extender, the DC breaker would immediately trip! I
tracked it down to the +5 volt crowbar being triggered. Careful examination
of about four different schematic pages shows a connection on the backplane
between edge connector pins BP2 & BR2 and the multiple +5 volt busses on
edge conn C. If you look at the schematic, BR2 is a test point but BP2 goes
to the anode end of the 5.7 volt zener that sets the crowbar voltage (its
cathode is connected to +5) and through a 10 ohm resistor to the crowbar SCR
gate with 100 ohms to ground.
This makes *no* sense because that connection shorts out the zener, so as
soon as the +5 comes up, 100/110 of the +5 is applied to the SCR gate, so
naturally it fires!
A close look at the G8018 provided the answer. There is half a finger etched
on BP2 which is also fully connected to BR2. (See picture) Looks like a
drafting mistake to me.
The Douglas extender board has sufficient depth in its female connectors
that the partial finger of BP2 made contact and caused the crowbar to
trigger as described. Cutting the "web" between the fingers fixed the
problem.
Naturally the intermittent flicker is gone for now, and I doubt it was an
"almost" connection to the SCR gate because once it fires, the +5 should
drop to near zero and trip the breaker, which has not been the case (except
with the extender card). But at least I have the regulator on the extender
card so I can start measuring when it comes back!
http://s1181.photobucket.com/user/DrCharlesMorris/media/PDP-8/P09-26-15_20.…
>>> As I mentioned in another response, I truly dislike SQLite, based on my
>>> experience with it on my Garmin GPS.
>>
>> I'm still not sure why - my experience has been very good. What bad
>> experiences have you had?
>> ~~
>> Mark Moulding
>>
>
> My Garmin has had data integrity issues in its database. Plus, lack of
> *convenient* tools, and having to rummage around here and there to find
> them.
>
> On top of that, this will be part of an online web app some day, so
> having the database in the address space of the web server is probably
> not a Good Thing.
I haven't used SQLite in an embedded environment yet. I wonder if it tends
to thrash certain areas of the data file (which would cause flash wear
problems). I appreciate the data point...
And yes, SQLite was not intended for a high-volume multi-access environment,
and my experience is definitely from embedded up through low multi-user
local network applications. I'm sure there are many good reasons why MySQL
has become the standard for web server applications. I originally
understood - perhaps erroneously - that this was to be a smallish, local
application, and for me (and the smallish types of systems I tend to build),
I'd prefer to avoid the headache of administering the MySQL subsystem.
But I stand by my statements about the separate, non-editable keys... :-)
~~
Mark Moulding
I wanted to share this because it's pretty neat:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0BHIknNa6Eg
It's a ~6 minute tour of a home automation system from the 1980s that
features graphical floor layouts and touch screen programming. The system
is built into the house.
--
Sellam ibn Abraham VintageTech
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
International Man of Intrigue and Danger http://www.vintagetech.com
Whatsoever a man soweth, that shall he also reap. The truth is always simple.
* * * NOTICE * * *
Due to the insecure nature of the medium over which this message has
been transmitted, no statement made in this writing may be considered
reliable for any purpose either express or implied. The contents of
this message are appropriate for entertainment and/or informational
purposes only. The right of the people to be secure in their papers
against unreasonable searches and seizures shall not be violated.
I have a BA11K power supply out of a pdp 11/34 that has frozen up fans.
They are frozen up pretty bad. I heard from another list member here they
are repairable, any advice on how to do so?
--Devin