In case you had not seen it already. I finally managed to control my big HP 7970E 9-track tape and my HP 2631G dot matrix from the little HP 85 that could. Hey, they all talk the same HP-IB after all (well, not really but close enough). Here is the resulting demo of this odd 1970's trio:
https://youtu.be/YS9dGYUbNd0
Marc
> From: Jacob Ritorto
> Can I tear apart my little BA23 .. and put the Micro/PDP-11 backplane
> .. into the spot that my 11/03 backplane currently occupies and run it
> via the (working) stock 11/03 power supply?
> ...
> Specifically, would I have to butcher power and clock lines to do this,
> or is it all plug compatible?
I'm not absolutely sure exactly what you have that's holding the '11/03
backplane'; if it's a standard BA11-M enclosure, the answer, sadly, is 'no'.
The BA-23 uses the H9278-A backplane and H7864 power supply; the BA11-M uses
the H9270-A and H780 backplane. The power connections between the first two
are completely different from the latter pair; the first uses a long,
single-width Molex-type connector, the latter uses bare wire ends to a
terminal block on the backplane.
Also, the H9270-A is a four-slot backplane, and the H9278-A (an eight-slot)
almost certainly will not physically fit into the space for the former.
If your '11/03 backplane' is a different kind of backplane, in some other kind
of box (e.g. BA11-N or BA11-S), the answer, sadly, is still 'no', because they
both also use terminal blocks for power. (Although if you have a BA11-S, you'd
already be set, those are Q22 native.)
Really, it's not that hard to upgrade an H9270-A (or the H9273-A in a BA11-N)
to Q22 (I have done several of the latter); the transplant you speak of (were
it possible) is on the same order of magnitude of work.
Noel
PS: In dragging my BA23 out to look at it, it dawned on me that I will
probably never, ever use it - I now have several BA11-N/S boxes, and prefer
them. (I don't need to run the later disks that need the BA23.) So if someone
is interested in the either the BA23, or the spare H7864 I have for it, please
let me know. I'll let either go for my original cost plus shipping.
All ?
I picked-up a Heath H-11 machine the other day and it has a single 4kw memory board. From my prior experiences with DEC (an 11/34a many years ago; now at the RI Computer Museum), I know my way around the field guide?but I?m having trouble trying to identify the correct module number suitable for the LSI-11 CPU. Even though it?s a Heath machine, I assume it?s module compatible with DEC. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks!
Rich
--
Rich Cini
Collector of Classic Computers
Build Master and lead engineer, Altair32 Emulator
http://www.classiccmp.org/cinihttp://www.classiccmp.org/altair32
I have an 11/73 card in one of my video editing systems...
does this mean I can give my H-11 more balls?
In a message dated 2/9/2016 11:36:30 A.M. US Mountain Standard Time,
jacob.ritorto at gmail.com writes:
On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 11:27 AM, Noel Chiappa <jnc at mercury.lcs.mit.edu>
wrote:
>
>
> I'm not absolutely sure exactly what you have that's holding the '11/03
> backplane'; if it's a standard BA11-M enclosure, the answer, sadly, is
> 'no'.
> [...]
> If your '11/03 backplane' is a different kind of backplane, in some other
> kind
> of box (e.g. BA11-N or BA11-S), the answer, sadly, is still 'no', because
> they
> both also use terminal blocks for power. (Although if you have a BA11-S,
> you'd
> already be set, those are Q22 native.)
>
>
OK, now that I know what I'm looking for, my target options here are:
Chassis:
BA11-N and "OBA11-R" (an expansion box)
Backplanes currently in these chassis are:
H9273 and H9273-A
Power supplies are all H786.
> Really, it's not that hard to upgrade an H9270-A (or the H9273-A in a
> BA11-N)
> to Q22 (I have done several of the latter); the transplant you speak of
> (were
> it possible) is on the same order of magnitude of work.
>
> Noel
>
So, since grafting in the Micro backplane would involve butcher work, I'm
now wholeheartedly convinced that I should be moving to your setup with the
BA11-N/S boxes, Noel. And I'm sold on the Q-22 backplane conversion
(despite failing the first time I tried it years ago). Going to study what
prints I have, review previous advice and go for it.
Thank you for all the tips and hand-holding!
--jake
On Mon, 08 Feb 2016 at 18:46:13 +0000, Adrian Graham wrote:
> Having had another bit of CBM kit with a failed CPU I'm wondering where you
> lovely US folk get your spares from since ebay seems a bit ridiculous for
> replacements at ukp8 a pop being the lowest price. They're surely not THAT
> valuable?
The first place I always check for things like that is Anchor Electronics
(anchor-electronics.com). I see that they don't list the 6502, but they
do have the 6502B for $4.95. I have no idea whether they ship outside the
US or not. The second place I check is Jameco, and someone else already
posted that they have them.
allan
--
Allan N. Hessenflow allanh at kallisti.com
> From: Henk Gooijen
> you need some some components to generate the AC LO and DC LO signals.
> The 11/04 needs them.
You could also do what I did on an off-brand LSI-11 chassis I had, whose
power supply was working (producing good +5V/+12V), but whose power control
board (to generate AC/DC OK signals) wasn't working - and I didn't have a
circuit diagram for it.
So I was lazy, and cheated: I disconnected the control board connection to
the backplane, and the pull-up termination resistors brought the AC/DC lines
up to their 'OK' state! :-)
I don't _recommend_ this, but it does work! If you do this, probably best to
power on the machine with the HALT switch asserted, so it doesn't try to run
while the power is still coming on! :-)
Noel
Yesterday I picked up the PDP11/04 that Jay mentioned a few days ago.
Less than 15 miles from home !
The machine spend its early days as a processor in chemical analysis apparatus, and was subsequently bought by the employee using it.
Before he could make use of it better, more powerful, easier to use machines came along and the -11 spend the next 30 years in a garage.
The -04 is an entry level machine, and the cards inside match this :
M7263 KD11 CPU
2 x M7264 16K DRAM cards
M7856 DL11 SLU/RTC
M7846 RX01 controller
2 x M7814 DZ11-F
and of course the M9301, M9302 and M9202.
Alas it has just the simple 2-switch frontpanel.
The machine also had the battery backup option, and the lead/acid batteries will celebrate their 40th birthday next year !
Better not try to charge them....
Overall the machine is in very good condition, both CPU and RX01, and it is packed in a very nice half-height rack with the red PDP11 bezel at the top.
Pictures next week when the machine is cleaned and reassembled, restoration is to start next winter, after a house move which will nearly double working area for the hobby.
Many thanks to Roland for preserving the machine, and to Jay for acting as an interface !
Jos
Exciting stuff for a Friday night, right? Here's a visual aid in case
you're needing further inspiration:
https://www.instagram.com/p/_K-zHhHvLn78Qu5ijWqMf-HBem1LKMLaEdI1c0/ The
M2333K is the smaller one on the left with the green and yellow lights on.
I'm booting from rl0, which contains the tuhs 2.9.1 rl02 image I wrote with
vtserver earlier.
I want to use my nice, roomy smd disk so I can pull in all the sources and
recompile stuff and I've managed to get this *so* close to working but I'm
getting
xp0a: hard error bn xxxx cs2=1100 <MXF, IR> er1=0
on every single block when I try to mkfs /dev/xp0a 4800
This disk was working fine years ago via MSCP attached to the 11/73 (before
I lost the Micro/11 power supply).
Anyway, I referred to
http://bitsavers.trailing-edge.com/pdf/emulex/SC2151001-CC_SC21tech_Jan87.p…
to set the emulation on the Emulex card for two rm03s and they're showing
up in xxdp's zrmlb1 formatter, though they won't format there, screensful
of errors.
I think I set the m2333k to 32 sectors, per this manual:
http://manx.classiccmp.org/collections/antonio/chrisq/B03P-4760-0101A_-_M23…
Because XXDP is reputed to be really strict, I figured that was normal and
then tried the Emulex on-board formatting procedure against both xp0 and
xp4 and they formatted perfectly without error. Guess the Emulex on-board
stuff doesn't bother verifying much?
So I think that maybe I've misunderstood the hard sectoring / sector sizing
thing. Does anyone remember the gist of it and would you be able to
describe? Do you see any other mistakes?
thx
jake
2nd go, apologies if another version of this arrives but I sent it from a
non-list address so it might not get through with the emergency moderation
going on.
Hi folks,
Having had another bit of CBM kit with a failed CPU I'm wondering where you
lovely US folk get your spares from since ebay seems a bit ridiculous for
replacements at ukp8 a pop being the lowest price. They're surely not THAT
valuable?
I know Mouser have got the 're-released' WDC 65C02 which I may end up going
for since for 10 they're as low as ukp4.37, but don't us collectors have
bundles of spares?
Funny when I think of the number of BBC Micros that have been tossed over
the years....
--
Adrian/Witchy
Binary Dinosaurs creator/curator
Www.binarydinosaurs.co.uk - the UK's biggest private home computer
collection?
Hi there!
Does anyone on here do much with RS/6000 boxes? I'm looking for a 7009-C10, 7011-250, or (mostly) PCI-based 7012 system capable of running AIX 4.1.
By any chance, anyone have such a system that they'd be willing to sell?
Thanks much!!
-Ben
Rumor has it that one or more people have designed and 3d-printed cases for
their HP-85 PRM-85 boards. Anyone have any of those cases available? I'd
like to get my PRM-85 a proper case :)
Best,
J
Five untested TK50 tapes available for postage and from 94025. Two have no
labels, the remainder have the following:
VMS 5.1-1 Maintenance Update
OD/OT Drivers for VMS 4.x 20-MAR-89
CZTK1D0 MICRO-11 CUST TK50
Please reply off-list if you'd like.
--
Lee Courtney
Hi all
I have the following gear in my stable:
- Sun Blade 100
- SGI O2
- VAXstation 3100
- AlphaStation 500
- HP C3700
I would like to start eliminating spinning SCSI drives from these
boxes for noise, heat and capacity reasons. Could you kind folks
recommend a solution? I've seen SCSI to CF converters advertised but
I didn't know if there was one kind over another that people have been
successful with or if there is a totally different approach I should
be considering.
Thanks,
Bryan
Just wanted to let folks know where I am with respect to the MEM11 project.
I had decided to take a break from writing J1 code and updating the simulator to actually work on
the hardware.
To make things easy for myself, I decided to use my FPGA eval board and build a daughter board
with CPLDs and other parts (FRAMs, etc) so that I could have another vehicle for validating the J1
code. This should also be a fairly simple board to build and I could focus on functionality (and test
points) rather than trying to make it fit into an SPC form factor.
I wrote a lot of the Verilog code for the CPLDs and quickly found out that my partitioning wouldn?t
fit in any reasonably sized CPLDs. Even with some additional re-partitioning, it was touchy as to
if it would fit (changing a couple of lines of Verilog code caused the design to no longer fit).
I went back and thought about the problem and decided that the easiest thing to do would be to
create a non-SPC formfactor board that was SW & HW functionally correct. So, I?ve been working
on writing all of the code to fit in an FPGA. One advantage is that I could re-use a lot of the code
that I wrote for the CPLDs.
Last night I managed to get a reasonably clean synthesis of the design. The only thing missing is
the UNIBUS code (which I hadn?t written yet). It fits easily into the FPGA that I?ve chosen (a Xilinx
Spartan 3-E 500).
By going this route, I?ve discovered some incorrect assumptions that I?ve made in terms of how the
HW will appear to the J1 code. So I have to update the simulator to match this and the relevant J1
code.
So, things are moving forward. I also wanted to get folk's opinion on the need to actually produce
an SBC form factor board. In other words (and sort of in line with how peripherals were done on the
original 11/20) is it OK to have the MEM11 be outside of the 11/20 chassis and connect via BC11A
(my replica) cables?
I wanted to put that out, because it may require a fair amount of work to make everything fit into an
SPC form factor. That?s assuming of course that the power requirements for the MEM11 can be
fulfilled by a single SPC slot. One of the things that I can do with the ?prototype? is actually measure
the incoming power. I?m hoping that it will but in the worst case, it may require splitting the MEM11
functionality across multiple boards.
TTFN - Guy
> From: Guy Sotomayor
> I also wanted to get folk's opinion on the need to actually produce an
> S[P]C form factor board. ... is it OK to have the MEM11 be outside of
> the 11/20 chassis and connect via BC11A (my replica) cables?
Well, that's going to up the cost; for some people, that might be an issue.
Also, I dunno if there are people out there with table-top 11/15's-20's (they
did exist BITD, I worked with a table-top one), but for them, an additional
box might be a hassle too.
> That's assuming of course that the power requirements for the MEM11
> can be fulfilled by a single SPC slot. ... in the worst case, it may
> require splitting the MEM11 functionality across multiple boards.
I guess I don't see the harm in making it two SPC (quad) boards? A flat cable
or two to connect across (I dunno how extensive the interconnect requirements
between the halves would be, and I have forgotten what the inter-slot
interconnect capabilities of an SPC backplane are - ISTR that it has some
bussing on the F section pins) would be easy and cheap.
Noel
There is the software side to classic computing: Back in the early
days we wrote/coded in BASIC-TinyBASIC running in 2K(talk about
writing efficient code!); EASY and SmallFORTRAN. What apps/programs
are written in today I don?t know. They certainly can?t run in 2 or 4
K but is the outcome the same ? make a computer or computer-like
machine do what we want it to.
On the lighter side: ?Computers can never completely replace humans.
They may become capable of artificial intelligence(much in the news
today), but they will never master real stupidity.?
Happy computing all.
Murray :)
Greetings!
I have a Televideo luggable that I have been playing with. Its a 10MHz 286
with a meg of RAM, 2 360k drives and four expansion slots. I've been trying
to figure out how capable I can make this machine for the hell of it. Did
anyone make an upgrade kit to go from a 286 to a 386? It would be
interesting to get this thing going with that, a Hard Card and an ethernet
card, somewhat capable of doing some modern tasks.
Thanks!
Joe
<https://www.avast.com/sig-email> This email has been sent from a
virus-free computer protected by Avast.
www.avast.com <https://www.avast.com/sig-email>
<#DDB4FAA8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
Today I discovered that I hadn't replaced the NiCd battery in time in my Amiga 3000. Pictures:
https://twitter.com/nf6x/status/696042894939979776https://twitter.com/nf6x/status/696050264306921472https://twitter.com/nf6x/status/696065578977472512
It's a fairly typical 3.6V 60mAH 3-cell NiCd pack, 16mm diameter x 18mm long, polarized with 2 pins on the positive end and 1 pin on the negative end.
In the past I have usually replaced these sorts of batteries with new ones of the same type. This time, I'm thinking of at least installing a remote holder. Not only to prevent further PCB damage in the future, but also to make the battery easier to replace. Lots of screws need to come out to extract an A3000 motherboard:
https://twitter.com/nf6x/status/696047816938946560
While I begin to figure out how I'd like to perform this repair, I'm curious about what others have decided to do in similar circumstances. Many options come to mind:
* Solder in the same kind of NiCd pack to keep things original.
* Solder in a supercap instead.
* Reconfigure the circuit to use a non-rechargeable lithium coin cell in a holder instead. I don't think I've seen one of those leak before.
* Yet some other remote battery option.
--
Mark J. Blair, NF6X <nf6x at nf6x.net>
http://www.nf6x.net/
Hi folks,
Having had another bit of CBM kit with a failed CPU I'm wondering where you
lovely US folk get your spares from since ebay seems a bit ridiculous for
replacements at ukp8 a pop being the lowest price. They're surely not THAT
valuable?
I know Mouser have got the 're-released' WDC 65C02 which I may end up going
for since for 10 they're as low as ukp4.37, but don't us collectors have
bundles of spares?
Funny when I think of the number of BBC Micros that have been tossed over
the years....
--
Adrian/Witchy
Binary Dinosaurs creator/curator
Www.binarydinosaurs.co.uk - the UK's biggest private home computer
collection?
Has anyone made a list of all the known software for the PERQ?
I'm on the hunt for a rumoured port of VAX ML (written in Pascal) to
the PERQ at Edinburgh.
thanks.
Tired of EVERYTHING with a gear being called STEAMPUNK? Yikes I am...
This fun and creative video pretty much sums things up!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TFCuE5rHbPA
Enjoy - Ed#
Hi Folks,
I'm looking for some insights in getting an original Altair running again.
My buddy asked for my help getting his Altair running again. He went
through and replaced all the electrolytic caps, cleaned up everything and
then tried to get the MITS 88 2-SIO board to run a simple echo program. It
wouldn't work and now I have the Altair,
I've been looking it over for about a week and I've noticed the following.
1). The 2Mhz base oscillator circuit will not reliably start up when it's
hot. It's perfect when cool.
2). The original MITS 2-phase clock circuit was modified. The 74123 was
replaced with a 74221 along with RC changes.
3). The MITS 2-SIO card has two Motorola 6850 ACIA's that don't seem to do
what their data sheets say they should be doing.
Some questions for you. (I've searched for insights on these topics and
information is scarce).
a). Was the Altair known for hot start issue(s) ? If so are their tried and
true fixes?
b). Going to a 74221 appears to be an excellent move. The RC changes were
prompted by that move. There is no longer an RC delay circuit from phase 0
to phase 1, which appears to make sense. I don't see one-shots as a wise
clocking design choice but my buddy wants to stay with it. Are their tried
and true fixes here?
c). I hand assembled some code to exercise the 6850. I know it has a
software reset and then you set attributes. I tried my buddies echo
program. It looks for a received character and then echo's it. I'm using a
laptop and PuTTy along with an RS-232 breakout box. I can see characters
going in but nothing coming out. The 6850 appears to drive the bus for a
finite amount of time and then turn off its drivers. I don't have any
experience with the part and I don't know if that's the way it's supposed to
work or that the Altair has a bus timing issue.
Any thoughts on what I'm seeing and suggestions/fixes ?
Thanks Robo
I am very envious of the animators skills on those singing people in
the still portraits..
Heh is there any easy way to do this? Ed#
In a message dated 2/7/2016 1:13:03 P.M. US Mountain Standard Time,
pete at dunnington.plus.com writes:
On 07/02/2016 17:50, COURYHOUSE at aol.com wrote:
>
> Tired of EVERYTHING with a gear being called STEAMPUNK? Yikes I am...
> This fun and creative video pretty much sums things up!
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TFCuE5rHbPA
Epic!
--
Pete
Well, about two weeks since my last announcement, but I figured I should
do another one.
I've cut a new release of TCP/IP for RSX, and I encourage everyone to
update to this latest release.
A short list of changes since my last release:
Documentation:
. I've worked some on the documentation, and filled out some parts that
were previously TBD.
TCP:
. Performance improvements. In general, I've improved file transfer
performance by about 20% by tuning when TCP ACK messages as well as
window updates are sent. On links where packets are dropped from time to
time, the performance improvements can be significantly higher.
. Bugfix. Retry counter were incorrectly reset under some circumstances.
. Bugfix. TCP did not resend an ACK if the same data was received twice.
. Bugfix. TCP sockets could erronously be left in a closed state with
no task. However, looking at the socket, it looked like a task was
associated.
FTP:
. Size calculation for stream type files in RSX mode was done incorrectly.
Applications:
. I've included a precompiled version of PCL.TSK
As usual, the distribution is available from:
ftp://mim.update.uu.se/bqtcp.dsk
ftp://mim.update.uu.se/bqtcp.tap
ftp://ftp.update.uu.se/pub/pdp11/rsx/tcpip/tcpip.dsk
The documentation is also available through ftp on Mim, or also at
http://mim.update.uu.se/tcpipdoc
Johnny
--
Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus
|| on a psychedelic trip
email: bqt at softjar.se || Reading murder books
pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol
I have two "flippy organizers" (that's around 20 floppies each) full of
these oddball floppies.
Picture at
https://www.flickr.com/photos/131070638 at N02/22020178558/in/dateposted/
They are 8", hard sectored, and the sectors are on the outer edge rather
than the hub, and there is an odd cutout on one edge that goes inside the
drive.
I know I don't have a machine that uses these, so they are available for
trade.
J
> Date: Sat, 6 Feb 2016 00:46:33 -0500
> From: Dan K <100dashsix at gmail.com>
> To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts"
> <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
> Subject: Re: Calibration of 8" floppy drive?
> Message-ID:
> <CAAQ+N0XNG=NnWGRnt8oxN4WeXTuoLCXPO9BQRn9oaSjZfVNW
> 5A at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> Are there any good alternative solutions I can do to replace it? I'm
> sure I don't want the plastic touching the disk media.
>
> -Dan
Seems like eons since I learned to align PerSci 299B's with Dysan alignment
disks and 'cat's eyes' on a 'scope :)
I echo the other sentiments here - do NOT undo or unscrew anything relating
to head positions especially involving allen (hex) screws unless you have a
'scope, an alignment disk, a very good quality set of hex screwdrivers (keys
will normally NOT suffice) and a modicum of experience. Granted, lead screw
single-headers are a little easier to do than voice-coil double-headers but
if you don't have to get into it then don't - explore all other options
first.
I'm afraid my TM-848's are double headers so the top head provides the
pressure but back when the drives were single headed felt pads did the job
of the second head. The tension was provided by the spring, the pad just
prevented scoring. I do NOT speak from experience BUT if I had to use
anything the kind of small felt pads you can get from hardware stores (e.g.
B&Q in the UK) seem remarkably similar in composition and would be worth a
try especially if you have one original to compare. Cut to shape, most are
self-adhesive too - bonus.
HTH
James
I've finally had my fill of the general grumpiness and bluntly worded
interactions on this list.
Over the years I have learned a lot and would like to particularly express
my thanks to Tony Duell, Fred Cisin and Chuck Guzis for being unfailingly
polite and very forthcoming with technical advice.
--
Gentlemen, I stumbled across a reference to Mosaic 4.0 for VMS dated 2006.
I ran Mosaic on my VMS workstation around 1994 and had abandoned it long
ago first for Netscape 3.0.3 and later for Seamonkey.
I did not know that there was any development on Mosaic in recent decades
I found Seamonkey to be glacially slow on AlphaServer 4100 "desktop" and
so I have not attempted to do much web browsing on VMS in recent years.
So... Is Mosaic 4.0 useful in 2016? Is it more useful than Seamonkey?
Netscape? AFAIR, HP had a port of Firefox to IA64 VMS but not to Alpha,
has anybody been so burdened with spare time that they have attempted
to port firefox to Alpha or VAX VMS? Or any other web browser?
I hope to attempt a port of the heritage version of nroff/troff to VMS
some time in the next couple years (I think groff would be much more
difficult). But that is a differant subject.
--
Richard Loken VE6BSV, Systems Programmer - VMS : "...underneath those
Athabasca University : tuques we wear, our
Athabasca, Alberta Canada : heads are naked!"
** rlloken at telus.net ** : - Arthur Black
I have two intermittently functional 8" floppy drives that I debugged
to the best of my ability, and as far as I've been able to tell their
problems must be limited to the circuitry that deals with the actual
magnetic interface with the disk. The intercommunication seems normal
and the head load solenoids fire, but after that the drive often
aborts the process, presumably because it wasn't able to read data
properly. I think the signal for reading the disk-rotation hole even
fires correctly.
The drives are Siemens FDD 100-8 drives used in an S-100 bus system,
and controlled by a Jade "Double D" disk controller. The machine was
in a functional state when stored, and I have known-good copies of
disks that I've been able to boot from at least a few times. (Unless
the drives somehow damaged them.)
Can someone knowledgeable about 8" floppy drives share information
about how these things were serviced and maintained, and what sort of
procedures were required to test and calibrate them?
Information I've picked up through osmosis leads me to believe that
there's a floppy disk with a special pattern on it, and you use
specialized test equipment to check the flux off the head and dial it
into proper settings. I suspect there the drive has trim pots or
similar that allow for this.
So, how do you deal with your 8" drives, and what do you do when they
don't work?
Thanks,
Dan
I had already turned on emergency moderation mode to try and stem the tide
of this escalating further. I had also already emailed a few people off-list
about this, which is primarily how it should be handled. Those who should
have been corrected... were. Quietly.
I'm rather tired of (a very few) people commenting "oh, this list is so much
smaller than other forums" or "there's such a low SNRatio here" or "Everyone
here is unfriendly (or things like that)". Screw all of that. I submit that
while this list may be small, it has the best content and expertise, far
better than others (I've looked). I submit that while the SNRatio gets off
track once in a great while, I've seen that happen elsewhere, and at least
as often if not more. Perhaps some should use their technical expertise to
study the function of the "delete" key. Quite frankly I don't think it
happens here all that often. Unfriendly? Perhaps there are a few that are
brisque at times. On the one hand - Guess what... that's life. In any crowd
there's always a few grumpy old men (of which I am one - especially at the
moment), and socially well-adjusted people should learn how to deal with it
and get along. On the other hand - That doesn't mean I don't correct those
that need correcting (and I did) .. but I really don't need to hear the
whining. It seems that there are one or two people that state they don't
want to participate because of one or more of the above... yet they stay
here solely to voice that opinion. Odd.
J
Great to hear! EK2 should make it a successfully revival.?
Sellam, you helping for fun too or happily still basking in the glory of making your goal of VCF X?
Glad its back though. The more the merrier for all regions to enjoy.
- John
<div>-------- Original message --------</div><div>From: Evan Koblentz <cctalk at snarc.net> </div><div>Date:02/05/2016 4:21 PM (GMT-06:00) </div><div>To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts" <cctalk at classiccmp.org> </div><div>Subject: VCF West is BACK ... woohoo! </div><div>
</div>Mark your calendars: Vintage Computer Festival West is back! August 6-7
this year at the Computer History Museum (Mountain View, Calif., just
like before).
We * just * signed the contract today. I'll email again when we have the
web site ready and stuff.
Primary organizer out there will be Erik Klein.
Mark your calendars: Vintage Computer Festival West is back! August 6-7
this year at the Computer History Museum (Mountain View, Calif., just
like before).
We * just * signed the contract today. I'll email again when we have the
web site ready and stuff.
Primary organizer out there will be Erik Klein.
Hello all - I have uploaded some new documents related to an employee
club at Hewlett Packard that sought to explore these new
"micro-computers" and, given the evidence at hand, design their own
(apparently a Z80-based CPU card of their own design, an S-100
backplane and an HP case.) The story as I know it is incomplete and
I'm sure more details will be filled in soon by those who were there.
The documents were lent to me for scanning by the daughter of an HP
employee. I'll be returning them to her soon; I believe she will be
offering them to CHM as a donation.
http://chiclassiccomp.org/docs/index.php?dir=%2Fcomputing%2FHP/HPMCIG
The docs are divided into directories as follows:
Micro Minutes: 30 issues of the newsletter of the Hewlett-Packard
Micro-Computer Interest Group, various dates between 1979 and 1983.
Some issues undated.
Non-HP_Docs: Documents from other vendors that were likely used by
the club. I'll place them in their own vendor directories also but I
thought leaving copies here help give us an idea of what the club was
working with or discussing at the time
Club_Notes: Emails, memos, handwritten notes, receipts and other
club-related ephemera
I thought it spoke well of HP as a company at that time that they
supported an employee hobbyist organization. Enjoy digging through a
unique bit of early Silicon Valley history.
-j
--
silent700.blogspot.com
Retrocomputing and collecting in the Chicago area:
http://chiclassiccomp.org
Does anyone out there have access to an HP-UX 11.x system? I am
looking for a ROM image file for the FX-e video card to help me write
an OpenBSD frame buffer driver for this platform.
Thanks,
Bryan
All ?
Does anyone know of an on-line archive of Heathkit manuals pertaining to the H11 (LSI-11) Heathkit computer? I haven?t been able to produce much that?s useful from Googling, so I thought I?d ask.
Let me know.
Thanks!
Rich
--
Rich Cini
Collector of Classic Computers
Build Master and lead engineer, Altair32 Emulator
http://www.classiccmp.org/cinihttp://www.classiccmp.org/altair32
Hi
I'm trying to boot a Bull DPX/2 and got stuck waiting for NFS to do
something, at least that is what I believe.
Is there anyone on the list with B.O.S experience that could help me
bring the sytem up under some kind of single user environment without
network.
I have a OS install kit with bootable floppies and I managed to get a
prompt using the "boot_unix" floppy and following the manuals that I
have.
However, not even "ls" would work from this prompt, only "cat". (You are
supposed to enter "os_install", but I don't want to mess up the existing
installtion.
/P
The "PDP-11/04 and floppy disk" I posted already was claimed by a
listmember. But after the fact, the owner sent me a picture. The listmember
who is getting it is getting a pretty nice system. One of the dec mid-height
cabinets that has the sloped front at the top. RX02 at the top, 11/04 under
that, and dec filler panels. Nice DEC magenta insignia on the slope at the
top front. Very nice.
Also - the dual 11/73 rack system has been claimed by another list member.
Best,
J
I received the following this morning....
------
I recently acquired a pdp11/73 with dual CPUs and am looking to sell it.
Would you know anyone interested.
I would like this to survive and wish to find it a good home. I live In
Massachusetts.
------
The person also gave me a picture, which I posted (temporarily) at
http://www.ezwind.net/pdp1173/
This particular machine is too new for my tastes, but the dual cpu (and
status panel) is rather unusual.
If anyone is interested, please email me off-list and I'll forward the
contact details.
Best,
J
This now has enough followers to move on to the next stage of the
approvals process -- gathering enough example questions...
http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/94441/
--
Liam Proven ? Profile: http://lproven.livejournal.com/profile
Email: lproven at cix.co.uk ? GMail/G+/Twitter/Flickr/Facebook: lproven
MSN: lproven at hotmail.com ? Skype/AIM/Yahoo/LinkedIn: liamproven
Cell/Mobiles: +44 7939-087884 (UK) ? +420 702 829 053 (?R)
I recently picked up an HP 9815s ( was originally an 'a' model but was
upgraded with an 's' cpu board and the option 002 i/o long before me), that
displays the "---------------" when turned on. I've scrounged through
Google and learned that this particular display is generated by the display
board when it has nothing else better to do to direct its attention. After
checking that the power supply was putting out the recommended voltages and
chasing the +5v around the cpu board and puzzling that for a bit, I've
checked for activity at the cpu and found no voltage at all being applied
at Vcc the cpu. I've been studying Tony Duell's schematic for the
9815(thank you Mr. Duell), but have not found a reason why this voltage
might not be present. Is Vcc switched somewhere? I done some meager
sleuthing of the traces around the 6800 and think I chased Vcc to a
transistor close by, but need to investigate further this weekend. Anyone
chased this type of failure on the 9815 or traced out wether this Vcc is
applied at power on or switched by some logic at the power supply board?
Puzzled, but determined,
Tom
At 09:25 AM 2/4/2016, Liam Proven wrote:
>A fair point, but then, one is not going to use MS-DOS to browse the Web in 2016, right?
In my world it is impossible for any one computer to do everything that I need to do with a computer, thus my five active PCs and many spares, plus old stuff like my CP/M machines in my personal museum. I don't use an MS-DOS machine to browse, and I don't use an NT-series-OS machine to run MS-DOS programs that need UART register access that NT does not allow.
Dale H. Cook, Roanoke/Lynchburg, VA
Osborne 1 / Kaypro 4-84 / Kaypro 1 / Amstrad PPC-640
http://plymouthcolony.net/starcity/radios/index.html
Is there a utility that will read .IMD diskette archive files and recover
the data? I've found a wealth of BigBoard & BigBoard II data (and lots of
other stuff too) on many different sites, all saved in .IMD format. Is it
possible to read these files and recover the data instead of writing a
floppy disk with DiskImage?
Thanks, Jim Simpson
Yesterday I dug out my NexTstation (68040 25MHz slab with 32MB of 100ns
SIMMs) which has OpenStep 4.2 for Mach installed. The lithium battery
was flat and it wouldn't boot so I've ordered a replacement and
temporarily kludged a pair of alkaline AAs to get it going. So far, so
good, though it thinks today is September 6 2001 :-)
Then I used SimpleNetworkStarter, set to "Use the network, but don't
share administrative data". I've also edited /etc/hostconfig and
reslv.conf to sensible values (eg TIME=-NO-) so it now boots quite quickly.
Is there a way to disable NetInfo completely, and if so will things like
DNS lookups still work?
Is there an easy way to make it get its time/date settings from my NTP
server? During startup it does claim to start netinfo, lookupd, ntpd
(see below), then inetd,
I have an SGI running IRIX which is my DHCP, DNS, and NTP server, and I
plan to set up the NexT to use DHCP to get its IP address etc (it's
static ATM).
--
Pete
Delayed response, work has been busy. That deal was passed off to the first
responder so it has likely been claimed. If that deal doesn't work out, I'll
email the next person on the list :)
But do not fret... I just see another user sent me an email today about
wanting to get rid of a machine... will post that one shortly ;)
J
Seems Windows 98 has got a few mentions on the list of late - must have just
come into the "classic era".
A while ago a good friend approached me as he wanted to get an old game up
and running that he really likes - Recoil (might ring a bell with a few list
folk) - wants the real experience, not the VM experience.
I'd be happy to help him out anyway but he has thrown a few old machines at
me from time to time rather than see them go to the tip so he definitely
gets help.
The game is quite particular and will only run on Win 98. I've resurrected a
HP e-Vectra that I have (very nice little machine by the way) that has a
serial on it for Win 98 SE but I really need the "actual" HP Recovery media
for it as I'm having some dramas getting the right video and sound drivers
for it.
I've struck out at HP and have tried a few vendors that still list parts for
this machine but no joy.
Be most grateful if someone can help me out or point me somewhere please.
Thank you!!!
++++++++++
Kevin Parker
++++++++++
[Please excuse the lack of threading - I read cctalk in digest form.]
On Wed, 3 Feb 2016, Jim Simpson wrote:
> Is there a utility that will read .IMD diskette archive files and recover
> the data? I've found a wealth of BigBoard & BigBoard II data (and lots of
> other stuff too) on many different sites, all saved in .IMD format. Is it
> possible to read these files and recover the data instead of writing a
> floppy disk with DiskImage?
Jim (and other cctalkers),
Grab a copy of the SIMH Altairz80 simulator from
http://schorn.ch/altair.html and the zip file of my cpmplus for the
CompuPro Disk1 controller from the Other Operating systems link at
http://schorn.ch/altair_5.php
This supports IMD disks in BB II 1.4Mb (1024byte x 9 sector) format. You
can attach the IMD file and use the "W" command to extract files to the
host operating system -
mini:cpmplus tony$ altairz80 cpm3bk
Altair 8800 (Z80) simulator V4.0-0 Beta git commit id: 4ff1e317
LDRBIOS for SIMH System - V3.2-Y2K 01-AUG-2008
DISK1 8" boot floppy
CPMLDR3 - CP/M V3.0 Loader
Copyright (C) 1982, Digital Research
BNKBIOS3 SPR FA00 0600
BNKBIOS3 SPR C600 1A00
RESBDOS3 SPR F400 0600
BNKBDOS3 SPR 9800 2E00
61K TPA
CP/M Plus for SIMH System - V3.2-Y2K 06-AUG-2008
Banked memory
CCP loads from A: and reloads from bank 0
DISK2 dual 20Mb M20 winchesters (A-F)
DISK1 8" (I-L) [BB-II] floppies
A>SETDEF * A: [ORDER=(COM,SUB) DISPLAY UK]
Drive Search Path:
1st Drive - Default
2nd Drive - A:
Search Order - COM, SUB
Program Name Display - On
Date format used - UK
A> <CTRL-E>
Simulation stopped, PC: 0FE8F (AND 02h)
sim> att disk1a3 ../s100/BB2-011.IMD
sim> go
A>l:
%FDDISK1 unit 3 is type BigBoard-II 1024x9 Read-Only
L>dir
L: BULLETIN : BYE COM : CALL-JAN PQN : COMMANDS HLP : DIR COM
L: ELAPSED COM : HELP COM : HELP HLP : INFO : MAGAZINE HLP
L: MBOOT ASM : NEWS : PAMSFEB1 0Q6 : PASSWORD COM : RBBS COM
L: TYPE COM : USERDISK CQT : WHATSNEW HLP : XYAM COM : XYAMHELP T
SYSTEM FILE(S) EXIST
L>w
A:W COM
WRITE V-1.17 (01-Mar-08) SIMH Interface V004
Usage: WRITE <file name> [B|T]
Copy <file name> to host environment. Default is text, B for binary, T for
Text
Examples
WRITE BDOS.MAC copy BDOS.MAC as text file
WRITE PIP.COM B copy PIP.COM as binary file
WRITE PIP.COM copy PIP.COM as binary file [.COM .REL .DAT imply B]
WRITE TEST.DAT T copy TEST.DAT as text file
WRITE *.COM copy all files matching *.COM as binary files
WRITE SRC/BDOS.MAC copy BDOS.MAC to directory SRC as a text file
WRITE COM/*.COM B copy *.COM to directory COM as binary files
L>w type.com b
A:W COM
WRITE V-1.17 (01-Mar-08) SIMH Interface V004
Write "TYPE.COM" to "TYPE.COM".
3.5kB written (Binary).
If you need to support other CP/M disk formats, the BIOS source files and
submit files to put them together are in the A1: directory on the hard disk
image. There's also CP/M program to make IMD disk images natively under
CP/M-Plus in A3: (it will span the IMD file across multiple floppies if the
image file is too large). I used this to copy all my 8" floppies (including
BB II ones) to IMD images.
Tony
--
Tony Nicholson <tony.nicholson at computer.org>
just for grins I took on of the SMECC e-machines out of back room and
fired it up... yea Win 98 SE running just great! last time I used
this particular old office system was '07! heh it has a 4 gig
hardrive
Ed# _www.smecc.org_ (http://www.smecc.org)
In a message dated 2/4/2016 11:53:40 A.M. US Mountain Standard Time,
radiotest at juno.com writes:
At 11:08 AM 2/4/2016, Ethan O'Toole wrote:
>If you're trying to bitbang the RS232 port to decode POCSAG or something
perhaps.
Not quite - this is not an asynchronous protocol, this is single-purpose
software written decades ago to communicate with highly specialized hardware
that is still in use.
>If you're trying to use old Windows software in more modern versions of
Windows ...
Nope, these are MS-DOS apps that require access to the UART registers.
Anyone who thinks that MS-DOS is dead and buried doesn't have to work with
some of the vintage (but still in use) technology that I sometimes deal with
at work. I am certain that there are many on this list whose vocations
involve decades-old hardware that is still in use.
Dale H. Cook, Roanoke/Lynchburg, VA
Osborne 1 / Kaypro 4-84 / Kaypro 1 / Amstrad PPC-640
http://plymouthcolony.net/starcity/radios/index.html
I was looking back at the discussion on what Mentec actually owned, back when it existed. The discussion on the list suggested that Mentec had a license but did not actually own the IP. It seems an odd arrangement that doesn't say much for the business skills of those making it, but I suppose it's posssible.
I found that there are some RSTS manuals at www.computinghistory.co.uk with Mentec cover pages. Among other things, a free for the download RSTS 10.1 internals manual, over 600 pages of good stuff.
The cover has a Mentec logo but no other ownership clues. I was hoping to see the copyright page to find out whose name appears there. Unfortunately, the scan omits the copyright page.
Does anyone have any manuals from Mentec? If yes, does it say "Copyright ... Mentec"? Or "Copyright ... someone else"?
paul
At 08:08 AM 2/4/2016, Liam Proven wrote:
>But NT is a better OS in every important or material way.
It is unusable in one important way. This thread began as a discussion of running serial port terminal emulators on a PC. At work I still use some MS-DOS programs (admittedly not terminal emulators) over serial ports. For my purposes (setting up a variety of vintage specialized hardware over RS-232) NT-based operating systems are sometimes unusable because they present the application program with a virtual serial port, and MS-DOS programs running under those operating systems cannot read from or write to the UART registers. Some of the setup programs for that vintage hardware were written before the mid-1990s and access the UART registers, so I have to run those under Win98 or earlier. I have a portable MS-DOS 3.3 machine that I use to set up that vintage hardware.
Dale H. Cook, Roanoke/Lynchburg, VA
Osborne 1 / Kaypro 4-84 / Kaypro 1 / Amstrad PPC-640
http://plymouthcolony.net/starcity/radios/index.html
> From: CuriousMarc
> Needless to say, you'd only boot to this Windows 98 for retro-computing
> purposes.
BTW, are you indicating that Win 98SE _in general_ should only be used for
retro-computing, or only Win 98SE _in the particular configration you
described_ should only be used that way?
Because, if the latter, I happily use Win 98SE on most of my machines, for
the vast majority of my work!
Of course, I don't need to run the latest and greatest uSloth
bloatware^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H applications, so they fact that they probably
won't run on the older Windows (What a shock! You don't think they would by
any chance want to encourage people to pay them a large pile of dineros for
the latest and 'greatest' version of their OS, do you?) is not a problem for
me.
The biggest issue, actually, for me, is that the latest Adobe Reader which
will run under Win 98SE is 6.0, and that doesn't support some of the latest
PDF's (in particular, encrypted ones).
Noel
> From: Guy Sotomayor
> When I have some time .. I'll fire up my 11/40 .. and then re-cable it
> using cables with a pair of BC11A-T ends and some ribbon cable. I'll
> run memory diagnostics on it for a while (I have 128KW of memory on it
> split between two racks, so this should be a good test) and see how it
> does
Might be interesting to throw a 'scope on a line on each end of the cable,
and see how things look after making it through the cable.
Noel
So, I figure it's unlikely, but I've been jonesing for a "larger" VAX
and I'd like to track down an 11/750 (or an 11/730). If anyone out
there has one for sale trade (in any condition apart from "pile of
slag"), let me know. I have DEC and various other gear for trade.
Thanks as always!
- Josh
On Feb 4, 2016 01:30, "Mark J. Blair" <nf6x at nf6x.net> wrote:
>
>
> > On Feb 3, 2016, at 20:37, Lee Courtney <leec2124 at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Date on the 730 notice is Aug 2009 - I suspect it is long gone by now.
:-(
>
> Where do you see that? The listing states:
>
> "Status: Open 2/1/16 - 02/07/16 23:59:00"
>
Lee must have quickly glanced at the message and seen the join date of the
author and thought it was the date of the message. I've done that a few
times on vintage-computer.com.
Jim
I just received the BC11A-T variant boards (the ribbon cables come out the ?top??yea not imaginative naming) this afternoon. I inserted a couple of the ribbon cable connectors on the board and everything looks great!
When I have some time (probably in a couple of weeks) I?ll fire up my 11/40 (to make sure it?s still working after all of this time) and then re-cable it using cables with a pair of BC11A-T ends and some ribbon cable. I?ll run memory diagnostics on it for a while (I have 128KW of memory on it split between two racks, so this should be a good test) and see how it does vs with the ?standard? BC11A cables.
TTFN - Guy
I have been messing with the Hercules emulator, and have really been
wanting to take a look at ibm AIX, and get a working install on an emulated
system 370. I have found no mention of install media or disk images of a
working system for download online.
Is there a good place to get the install media?
McDonnell Douglas dec 10
SPACELAB list?
In a message dated 2/2/2016 10:47:44 P.M. US Mountain Standard Time,
jws at jwsss.com writes:
I was talking to a former co-worker who worked for McDonnell Douglas
Network Systems Company who owned Tymshare at one point, and he had a
picture of a 1mb memory from one of the nodes.
He passed along this link to the manual for the node processor.
http://bitsavers.trailing-edge.com/pdf/tymshare/tymnet/NPD-604_Engine_Family
_Maintainence_Print_Manual_Apr85.pdf
Wondering if any survive and are working.
It was a 64 bit microword, 32 bit data path TTL logic type machine,
similar to one of the ones I worked on pre-bitslice days. Also wonder
if the microcode survived.
Date on the drawings was 1978 though this manual set is coded as April
1985.
thanks
Jim
I was talking to a former co-worker who worked for McDonnell Douglas
Network Systems Company who owned Tymshare at one point, and he had a
picture of a 1mb memory from one of the nodes.
He passed along this link to the manual for the node processor.
http://bitsavers.trailing-edge.com/pdf/tymshare/tymnet/NPD-604_Engine_Famil…
Wondering if any survive and are working.
It was a 64 bit microword, 32 bit data path TTL logic type machine,
similar to one of the ones I worked on pre-bitslice days. Also wonder
if the microcode survived.
Date on the drawings was 1978 though this manual set is coded as April 1985.
thanks
Jim
Our group here in NJ + surroundings now has monthly-ish repair workshops
(vs. a few times per year before). At the workshop this past weekend,
David Gesswein continued restoring our PDP-8.
David summarized: "I fixed the known fault of accumulator bit
going to zero when it was rotated left. This was a bad diode on one
of the accumulator boards. I also replaced two bad bulbs and a third
that died during the repair. Since one that died was one I previously
replaced I'm going to use the not quite matching bulbs with heavier
wires for future repairs. The wires are just too thinn on the 1762 bulbs
and now that they have aged they break too easy. I then found that the
teletype interface wasn't working and replaced a diode on a R220 to fix
output. Input is not working properly. I have traced it to a particular
flip flop on a R220 where when the data changes it feeds through to the
output without the clock active. I ran out of time to identify the
component that needs replacing."
Here's a little video of the computer chasing its lights. :)
http://www.vcfed.org/evan/pdp8lights.mp4
>Ulrich Tagge wrote:Hi Glen,
> [Snip]
>
> List/change parameters in the Setup table
>
> A - ANSI Video terminal (1) 0=No, 1=Yes = 1
> B - Power up 0=Dialog, (1)=Automatic, 2=ODT, 3=24 = 1
> C - Restart 0=Dialog, (1)=Automatic, 2=ODT, 3=24 = 1
> D - Ignore battery 0=No, 1=Yes = 0
> E - PMG 0-(7) 1=.4us, 2=.8, 3=1.6, 4=3.2,...7=25.6 = 7
> F - Disable clock CSR 0=No, 1=Yes = 0
> G - Force clock interrupts 0=No, 1=Yes = 0
> H - Clock 0=Power supply, 1=50Hz, 2=60Hz, 3=800Hz = 1
Does anyone have an idea as to how the choice of the 800Hz
option was made?
I could understand 1000Hz or perhaps 1200Hz which allows
division by both 50 and 60. But 800Hz seems like such an
unlikely value.
On the other hand, on the PRO350, the clock rate was 64Hz
and every 16 ticks, I assume that one tick was discarded so
as to support the appearance of a 60 Hz clock.
Jerome Fine
I successfully imaged OS revs E0, F0, F1, G0 and H0 of the Pascal
Microengine from the original
distribution media this morning with the application of cyclomethicone
as Chuck suggested. I
was worried since they were 79'ish vintage BASF media, but the
lubrication did the trick and
they read without errors.
http://bitsavers.org/bits/WesternDigital/microengine_distributions_E0-H0.zip
THAT IS WHAT WE USED TO CALL THE CYLON EYE PROGRAM!
eD# _WWW.SMECC.ORG_ (http://www.SMECC.ORG)
In a message dated 2/2/2016 1:27:02 P.M. US Mountain Standard Time,
cctalk at snarc.net writes:
Our group here in NJ + surroundings now has monthly-ish repair workshops
(vs. a few times per year before). At the workshop this past weekend,
David Gesswein continued restoring our PDP-8.
David summarized: "I fixed the known fault of accumulator bit
going to zero when it was rotated left. This was a bad diode on one
of the accumulator boards. I also replaced two bad bulbs and a third
that died during the repair. Since one that died was one I previously
replaced I'm going to use the not quite matching bulbs with heavier
wires for future repairs. The wires are just too thinn on the 1762 bulbs
and now that they have aged they break too easy. I then found that the
teletype interface wasn't working and replaced a diode on a R220 to fix
output. Input is not working properly. I have traced it to a particular
flip flop on a R220 where when the data changes it feeds through to the
output without the clock active. I ran out of time to identify the
component that needs replacing."
Here's a little video of the computer chasing its lights. :)
http://www.vcfed.org/evan/pdp8lights.mp4
Hi List,
I have a working 11/84, and I have decidec, to test some of my spare
cards, starting with: KDJ11-B.
I see the following error, when powering up the system, which points me
to the Clock.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Error 61
M8190 clock Error
See troubleshooting documentation
Command Description
1 Rerun test
2 Loop on test
Type a command then press the RETURN key:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Any hints, what the problem could be? Is the clock in this new PDP's
still generated out of the line frequency? Could it by, that the KDJ11-B
is configured to a wrong HZ value?
Many Greetings
Ulrich
While browsing various 8 inch floppies I have found a couple of disks that
seems to contain ISIS-II stuff.
I discovered a document specifying the format of the disk and managed to
extract the contents:
Disk1:
arbetsrumsdatorn:ISIS mattis_lind$ ls UNKN2
ATTRIB DSPERR ICE80.OV1 ISIS.LAB PLM80.OV0 PLMCOD.CSD
COPY EDIT ICE80.OV2 ISIS.MAP PLM80.OV1 PLMNOC.CSD
DELETE FORMAT ISIS.BIN ISIS.T0 PLM80.OV2 RENAME
DIR ICE80 ISIS.CLI PLM80 PLM80.OV3 SUBMIT
DSP ICE80.OV0 ISIS.DIR PLM80.LIB PLM80.OV4 SYSTEM.LIB
Disk2:
arbetsrumsdatorn:ISIS mattis_lind$ ls DISK2
ALIAS DEBUG EXEC LINK RELEAS TTY
ALLOC DELETE FORMAT MDUP REMAP TXT
ANALYZ DGEN FRAPP MEMDMP RENAME TXW
ASM DIR HEXBIN MOVE RESCUE XREF
ASSIGN DIRPAC INIT MYLOAD SEDIT
ATTRIB DROP ISIS.DIR O SYS
DCONVA DRSTC ISIS.ERR PAGE SYSTEM
DCOPY EDIT ISIS.LAB PROM T2
DDUMC ETX ISIS.MAP RASM TPGEN
If someone is interested in these I put them here:
http://www.datormuseum.se/documentation-software/isis-ii-floppy-disks
There were also a DSDD format on some disks which seemed a little bit
different. The ISIS.DIR used 32 byte entries rather than 16 byte entries
and the directory linkage block structure seemed to be different. I didn't
spend any time other than recognize the difference.
Is there any documentation that specify the various ISIS disk formats there
is?
/Mattis
> From: Dale H. Cook
> I have spare IDE drives for my 98SE laptops.
Might want to drag them out once a year and run them, to prevent anything
sticking over time. (I should take my own advice, here.... :-)
Noel
On Sun, 31 Jan 2016, Pete Lancashire wrote:
>> On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 1:24 AM, Henk Gooijen <henk.gooijen at hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Spend the extra few dollars (or what your currency is) and pack it in a
>> very strong box. I've actually had EPROMs show up cracked in half
>
>Seconded. The machines the USPS uses for automated sorting of mail are not
>gentle on parcels.
>
I'd rather strongly suggest you not us the USPS period. In the last 6
months or so they've flat out lost 4 items either destined to or
shipped by me, and one item apparently (according to the tracking web
site) sat in a sorting facility in Utah for nearly a month before
magically showing up. Glad it wasn't perishable.
KJ
While I was reading through the HP 200/300 BASIC Manual I came across some
interesting points I hadn't considered in the past.
I thought HP manuals were dry and hard to read, but I was wrong. See for
yourself...
Installing, Using, and Maintaining the BASIC 5.0 System
=============================================
Loading BASIC, page 1-16
-------------------------------
If You See Nothing on the Monitor Screen
Here are some possible explanations:
- The monitor's brightness is not turned all the way up.
- The monitor is not plugged in.
- The computer is not plugged in.
- Your eyes are not pointed in the right direction, or are obscured by your
eyelids.
Other Maintenance Tasks, page 17-1
--------------------------------------------
The following list mentions some things users take for granted or tend to
forget.
...
- ...
- ...
- Rotate your tires and otherwise examine your system to see that it is
performing nicely.
Maybe the author had a good friend in final quality control of the manuals.
Martin
Hi
My employer is moving house and need to clear out some old stuff. We
have ported to many, many Unix systems over the years and have kept some
of the machines.
Available is:
1x IBM RS/6000 big and beige
1x Bull DPX/2
1x Concurrent Computer Corporation in rack
1x Sperry unix machine
1x NCR (same as above, other label)
Possibly 1 VAX 4000 and possibly one Alphaserver 2000.
Pickup only. We will remove hard drives since they contain source code.
In a few weeks, this will be gone.
A few pictures here:
http://www.update.uu.se/~pontus/slask/jobb_vind/
Items are in Uppsala, Sweden.
/P
Hi folks,
This is as always a tremendous long shot, but I figured I would put
it out there anyway.
I am still eagerly looking for any and all Symbolics systems. I know
very well how rare these things are, and how much money they are
worth.
If you have any systems you would be willing to let go of,
let's talk. I'm happy to entertain trades if that's something
you're interested in, but I'm also happy just to pay fair market
prices.
For reference, I am located near Seattle, WA.
Best Wishes,
-Seth
P.S.: I also know how difficult they are to care for and keep running!
I'm all too familiar with dying ESDI drives and bad power supplies.
Come one come all!
Its the day of reckoning.
I finally have some storage on loan from a company called Funsoft!
Hopefully by the end of the night I will have Linux installed and a
portal to the internet to which people can connect and play on it!
http://www.twitch.tv/conmega
-Connor Krukosky
Just received an email from someone who has a PDP-11/04 with "Floppy Disk"
looking for a good home.
The machine is located in Switzerland. Please email me off-list if
interested.
J
In the original Unix BSTJ of 1978 Sandy Fraser described a system he called
"Circuit Design Aids". Schematic capture was done on a 4014 and conversion
went all the way to wire wrap.
CDA was rehabbed and rewritten by many people over the years. It became
known as the Unix Circuit Design System (UCDS) and it was available from
Bell Labs under a separate
license as I recall. UCDS was used to design many projects including the
5620, Belle and others.
When Plan9 arrived, UCDS was converted to Plan9 (not too hard...) and
renamed back to CDA. The code was released in the first Plan9 CDROM.
So. It occurred to me that I could back port it to Linux. I did so with
help from H. Trickey and the Plan9 compatibility library. I put all of
this code on https://github.com/kahrs/cda.
The interested and curious can find it there. I make no promises about
full functionality, however, it is available for those who want to tinker.
Hi,
I've been messing around with my PDP11/83 and a Microvax, both
in BA23 boxes here.
These fans make too much noise for my home office area, and I cannot
possibly need the original airflow. Even with the internal jumper set
for 10V to power the 12V rated fan motor, these are still noisy. It's
not even just the noise of the air moving, but largely a whine from
the fan motors. One box is worse than the other with the wine.
I've unplugged the front fan, since instead of spinning drives I have
solid state CF cards and SCSI converters -- no heat in the front of
the box at all.
I have some 24V fans in my junk box that fit and make almost no sound at
12V, but at half voltage might not move enough air to keep the power
supply, CPU, memory, SCSI, and ethernet boards happy. My guess is so
long as there is some air movement over the boards, the biggest issue
of concern is cooling the power supply.
Does anyone have any suggestions for figuring out how much airflow I
actually need, and achieving it with either stock fans at further reduced
voltage, or some kind of replacements? I don't need an accurate solution,
or something with complicated compensation for varying temperature,
just something quieter, moving less air, but still enough air.
Mark
--
Mark G. Thomas (Mark at Misty.com), KC3DRE
Does anyone want to have their children exploited for profit and
entertainment?
"I'm currently Producing a show for TLC that features children who have a
passion for collecting. I was wondering if you know any kids who have a
sizable collection of vintage computers? If you can think of anyone who
would be interested in appearing on our show, I would greatly appreciate
it if you could connect me with their parents to discuss the show
further."
If anyone is interested e-mail me privately and I'll give you all the
contact details for this producer.
--
Sellam Abraham VintageTech
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
International Man of Intrigue and Danger http://www.vintagetech.com
Whatsoever a man soweth, that shall he also reap. The truth is always simple.
* * * NOTICE * * *
Due to the insecure nature of the medium over which this message has
been transmitted, no statement made in this writing may be considered
reliable for any purpose either express or implied. The contents of
this message are appropriate for entertainment and/or informational
purposes only. The right of the people to be secure in their papers
against unreasonable searches and seizures shall not be violated.
Does anyone have a PDP-11/03 or LSI-11 with the KEV11-C CIS
(Commercial Instruction Set) option? It may have also been known as
DIS (Dibol Instruction Set). It apparently consists of two microcode
ROM chips (MICROMs), 23-004B5 and 23-005B5.
Last month I posted here about building a circuit to dump the contents
of MICROMs:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/22368471 at N04/albums/72157662054690240
I've dumped the base LSI-11 instruction set chips and the EIS/FIS
chip. I've partially disassembled the former:
https://github.com/brouhaha/lsi11uc
and verified that the latter matches the EIS/FIS microcode source code
provided with the KUV11 writable control store support software. I'd
like to dump the CIS microcode ROMs as well. The resulting dump would
be usable by anyone with a KUV11. I'm contemplating developing a
MICROM replacement board, which would be useful for those without a
KUV11.
I've made more progress with the WD9000 Pascal Microengine microcode
than the LSI-11 microcode because someone provided a photomicrograph
of the CP2161 control chip and I was able to dump the PLAs. I should
be getting a photomicrograph of the CP1621 control chip of the LSI-11
soon, and will be able to do the same for it.
I'm looking for a bunch of OS patches necessary to get Firefox 2 running under Solaris 8 on my Sun Ultra 60. The patch mirror I used previously appears to have dumped the Sun patches in 2014, and the only up to date references I've seen to Sun patches now appear to be locked behind an Oracle cu$tomer $upport login. Perhaps Oracle bludgeoned any open mirrors to death with stacks of C&D letters?
Are there any open mirrors of old Solaris patches lurking out there? Or maybe somebody has a private stash of patches? The ones I need are these ones (or later versions):
108434-17
108435-17
108652-79
108773-18
109704-03
111721-04
114542-01
I have older versions of all but the last one already, which I fetched a few years ago. But the older versions won't allow Firefox 2 (which is the latest browser I've found for Solaris 8 so far) to run. I have Netscape 4.76 on the machine, which is too old to deal well with the modern web. I'm not sure how much better Firefox 2 will be, but I'd like to find out!
--
Mark J. Blair, NF6X <nf6x at nf6x.net>
http://www.nf6x.net/
I was trying to archive a bunch of 8 inch floppy disks. Everything was well
until I tried an Inmac brand disk. It had severe sticky shed problems.
Since it was a non-important disk it wasn't that bad. Baking might solve
the problem so before continuing with the rest of the Inmac branded disks
with more valuable content I searched internet for knowhow on baking.
Then I found this article
https://www.questia.com/library/journal/1G1-359998950/the-new-non-baking-cu…
on a cure for the sticky shed without baking the tape.
I haven't read the article in ARSC since I am not a member. But maybe
someone knows what this is about?
/Mattis
On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 12:51 PM, Brian L. Stuart
<blstuart at bellsouth.net> wrote:
> I'll be glad to loan them to you for the good of the community and history.
That would be great, thanks! I'll email you my contact information.
Could you please post the markings of the other 40-pin chips as well,
and/or a photograph?
Best regards,
Eric
On Sat, 1/30/16, Eric Smith <spacewar at gmail.com> wrote:
> Does anyone have a PDP-11/03 or LSI-11 with the KEV11-C CIS
> (Commercial Instruction Set) option? It may have also been known as
> DIS (Dibol Instruction Set).? It apparently consists of two microcode
> ROM chips (MICROMs), 23-004B5 and 23-005B5.
Eric,
It turns out my quad height LSI-11 card has the 23-004B5 and 23-005B5
chips on it. The full markings are:
DEC
3025D
23-004B5
8030 B
and
DEC 3026 D (or maybe B)
23-005B5
8015 C
I'll be glad to loan them to you for the good of the community and history.
BLS
From: jnc at mercury.lcs.mit.edu (Noel Chiappa)
> > Win-98 SE ... it would have been nice if it recognized USB storage
> > devices natively.
>
> There is that package you can add (my copy is in a self-extracting
> archive,
> called "nusb23e.exe") that recognizes USB drives, etc. I run a number of
> USB
> devices (memory sticks, mice, etc) on my 98SE's and they all work fine.
Thanks for the tip - I wish I'd known about that 15 years ago!
From: "Jerome H. Fine" <jhfinedp3k at compsys.to>
>> >mark at markesystems.com wrote:
>>
>>> QUESTION: Is it even possible to run Win98SE on a current
>>> Intel I7 CPU with SATA hard disk drives? I realize that it might
>>
>> Almost certainly not, at least practically. Even if you can get it to
>> boot and install, it will have no idea how to handle any of the modern
>
> Then I am really confused. I have two older systems that
> are able to run 64-bit Windows 7, an E8400 and a Q9550.
> Both take SATA drives which are still available. The mother
>
> I can also still boot from both system using an old DOS 3.5"
> floppy media and run Ghost 7.0 with these old SATA drives,
> but as far as I can understand, using the device drivers on the
> floppy drive.
I believe that Win98 tries to use its own drivers for disk, but if it can't
find any that work it just uses the ones built into the BIOS. Performance
suffers, because all disk I/O becomes blocking, but it still works. With a
modern disk with built-in cache, one probably wouldn't even notice the
difference (except for the floppy).
> Is it likely that either of these two systems be able to run
> Win98SE with the SATA hard drives, in one case 500 GB
> each and the other system has 1 TB drives. In that case, it
I would expect that you could successfully boot and install Win98, although
you couldn't use all the drive in one volume (FAT32 is good for a little
over 100 gig); I've never tried partitioning up a terabyte drive and running
Win98 on a appropriately-sized partition, but it seems like it might work
OK. As above, the BIOS will take care of the fact that Win98 never heard of
SATA, and also abstract the USB keyboard and I think the mouse to look like
AT-type devices.
As I mentioned, though, it won't know about the video adapter, so that will
run in VGA 640x480 16-color mode; the sound card won't be available either,
nor the network interface. VirtualBox simulates all nice period-style
hardware for those things.
> As I mentioned, the only two applications I would run would
> be the DOS variant of Ersatz-11 and Netscape 7.2 for e-mail
> and newsgroups.
I suspect that both of those would run on Windows XP, and VirtualBox handles
that extremely well.
From: Chuck Guzis <cclist at sydex.com>
> I didn't mention that I've got 98SE running on an 820 chipset
> (RIMM/RDRAM is silly cheap now) with a Tuallie 1.4GHz in a Powerleap
> slocket. It doesn't much agree with the Crystal CS4622 audio, but
> perhaps that's just a matter of finding the right driver.
As I predicted... :-)
>> Windows 98 was supposed to support a maximum of 2GB of memory, however
>> it has a bug in the Vcache driver which causes problems unless you limit
> Exactly what I've done with 440GX system. Using a different XMS driver,
> I keep a 1GB RAMdisk there.
But it runs quite nicely in just 64 or 128 meg, which was much more typical
of a machine of that period.
> On faster, more modern systems, I use VirtualBox. Just not worth the
> extra trouble finding drivers--but I suspect 98SE will run on P4 systems
Yup, that's what seems to work best for me.
From: "js at cimmeri.com" <js at cimmeri.com>
> The one thing I'm not seeing mentioned
> in re VirtualBox is that what if you
> have a legacy Win 98SE system with
> hardware in it, like a GPIB card or
> sound card? Or if you have software
> that talks to hardware via serial or
> parallel ports eg. eprom burners, Zector
> ZVG vector graphic driver for MAME, etc.
Yup, that's true. VirtualBox will provide one or two com ports (optionally
mapped to the real host ports, or just pipes to other virtual machines), but
it doesn't support the parallel port. And as you've pointed out, any
specialized hardware won't work at all (because the backplane doesn't really
exist).
> The other hassle is having to
> essentially rebuild an Win98 (or any
> other) machine from scratch in order to
> try to replicate an existing setup. I
Also true...
From: Josh Dersch <derschjo at gmail.com>
> everything else, you're SOL. I could see it being possible to modify
> VirtualBox to support parallel port forwarding or other exotic hardware
Wow! I guess it is open source, but that would be quite a bit of work, I
expect. If you do it, let me know - I've got an old Needham's PROM
programmer that would be nice to have working again.
From: John Foust <jfoust at threedee.com>
> No one has mentioned the Windows Virtual PC, a Microsoft product,
> that lets you run Windows XP apps in a virtual environment under
> Windows 7 Pro, letting XP apps run in their natural window on
> the 7 desktop, or you can run the virtual XP machine desktop
> in its own window.
I used an earlier version of Virtual PC on XP, and found that it worked
fairly well, although it was very resource intensive. So many applications
failed to run correctly on Win7 that Microsoft felt compelled to make a very
tightly integrated version for that operating system (Pro or greater only);
it was pretty neat how tightly integrated it was. That's how I ran
QuickBooks and a couple of other recalcitrant programs, but it wasn't a
panacea. In particular, applications that had several programs running
simultaneously, especially if they communicated via DDE (DDEML) were still
broken, and the tight integration was always a little scary to me. (If I
fired up a "stand-alone" XP machine, it would always want to log off or shut
down the one that had been running some other application, and because of
the Draconian security, I was never sure that I'd be able to get it back...)
> It will also run Windows 98, with a few gotchas:
This is what I did with the earlier Virtual PC on top of XP, and it worked
fairly well. Like VirtualBox, it's free, but I find that VirtualBox tries
to do less integration "magic", and therefore feels like a more stable and
clearly delineated product.
I've seen no mention of Virtual PC on Win8 / 8.1 / 10 - does it still exist,
and is that "XP-mode" feature still available?
~~
Mark Moulding
I have got a HP 9000/217 machine with a standard video card. This card has a monochrome composite output (resolution is as low as about 512x400, but I might replace it with a higher resolution card). A small 9" HP monitor that I used for testing only shows me 2 or 3 bands of the image and cannot capture the signal properly.
All I have are modern TFT monitors which usually have VGA and/or DVI inputs, no separate R-G-B or monochrome jacks.
What is the preferred way to connect "old" composite video signals to a modern TFT monitor without losing too much sharpness? I understand that interpolation is an unavoidable problem.
Searching the internet did not give me a clear answer. Do you have any recommendations?
Thank you, Martin
Has anyone found a source for replacement ribbons, or even re-inking
supplies, for the Commodore VIC-1525 printer?
This printer was manufactured in Japan by Seikosha for CBM, and was also
sold in the USA by Radio Shack, re-badged under the Tandy / TRS-80 brand.
For reference - The VIC-1525 employs an odd two-cassette ribbon system,
that uses a continuous-loop ribbon only about 24" in total length. One
cassette contains a spring tensioner mechanism, with the second cassette
holding the inking roller and (friction?) gear.
The ribbon loop is strung side-to-side between the two cartridges, with the
front strand passing in front of the print head, and the rear strand
passing through the ribbon advance clutch.
Google turns up nothing, except for some homebrew recipes for making new
ink.. and one site offering exorbitantly priced NOS ribbons that are just
as likely dried up.
Thanks for any & all input..
I know Chuck Guzis has written about this, but I don't see that he's done
so publicly in the last few years, so I thought I'd ask here about his and
others' views on the perennial question of whether (some) 3.5" DSHD disks
can be reliably used in DSDD-only drives. The oft-repeated claim is that
writing can appear to work just fine, but that even a few months later read
errors will occur.
On <http://www.retrotechnology.com/herbs_stuff/guzis.html> Chuck was quoted
as (actually, correct me if I'm wrong -- it's a little hard to be sure this
was Chuck's words) as saying "Usually, they're just fine, with the error
rate approximately the same, whether or not 2D or HD media was used." Just
before that, he said "I think that the overall quality of DSHD 3.5" media
isn't what it used to be, so that might contribute to the general
impression that 3.5" HD diskettes used as 2D aren't reliable. I have
problems enough finding reliable 3.5" DSHD floppies used as such." Chuck et
al., what's your feeling now, both on the overall reliability of HD disks
in DD drives, and on whether it depends on how recently the disks were
produced?
Elsewhere on the page (I don't recall now if it was Herb or Chuck that said
it) it was conjectured that HD disks that have never been formatted as HD,
-OR- disks that have gone through a good degaussing, will have better luck
retaining data. What does everyone think about this? And would an
electromagnetic library security system (the kind that's like a tube
through which checked-out materials are put; often with a caution not to
put tapes or floppies through it) be a suitable degausser?
--
Eric Christopherson
I'm a retired software engineer. My first home computer was a Z80 CP/M
system built on the Big-Board II back in the mid '80s. I bought a bare board
kit and went from there. It took me several months to collect all the parts
before I had a running system.
After discovering some very old M80 assembler listings while rummaging in
my basement, I've been bit by the "nostalgia bug" so I dug out my old system
and powered it on. It still runs after all of these years. The problem is
that I've lost most of my old 5.25 media and therefore the system utilities
. I'm looking for any Big-Board II system disk images/files I can find.
I'm also trying to recover all of the Micro Cornucopia UG diskette data.
Ultimately I want to put all of that old data on optical media for safe
keeping.
I'm looking for any BB-II stuff or Micro-C user group disk stuff. Help here
will be much appreciated!
Thanks, Jim Simpson
> From: CuriousMarc
> I could run Explorer 5.5, but never 6.0.
?? 6.0 runs fine on all my 98SE machines.
If you need to get to a later Web site (many don't work with older IE's now),
there is a version of Opera (9.80, Version/10.63) which works under 98SE and
makes most sites accessible. There are only a _very_ few where I have to use
another browser running under a later Windows.
Noel
To my surprise, I found something just barely old enough to interest me on the e-waste pile at work: An IBM PS/2 85 from around 1993 or so. The hard drive is long gone and it didn't include a keyboard, but it did come with a model 8516 touch screen display and original mouse. I already had a nice Model M to plug into it, plus some scsi2sd adapters sitting around waiting for projects like this one.
I'm new to the PS/2 line, but after some poking around I found images of the reference and diagnostic disks necessary to set this machine up. I also found the ADF file needed for the Cabletron ethernet card in it. The machine has 12M of parity RAM, with one SIMM slot pair still open. It has a 2.88M 3.5" floppy and a 1.2M 5.25" floppy. The 5.25" floppy is a motor-eject style which I haven't encountered before. This model has a 486SX 33MHz CPU, and the math coprocessor socket is empty. Aside from a bunch of dust that I cleaned out, it's in pretty nice cosmetic shape. This particular model was intended for duty as a server.
I've been posting pictures of the machine on Twitter over the last few days, starting on 1/21/2016:
https://twitter.com/nf6x/media
I replaced the CMOS battery (conveniently, a CR2032 coin cell, available at the local supermarket), reconfigured the CMOS settings, set up a scsi2sd as four emulated 512M SCSI hard drives, milled a pair of generic PC hard drive mounting rails to length for use in a PS/2, and installed MS-DOS 6.22 on it. OS/2 2.0 would probably be more appropriate for this machine, but I don't have it. I see original OS/2 2.0 boxes in the shrink wrap on eBay, but eBay and I are seeing other people at this time.
Well, I seem to have it fully working aside from not having suitable software installed to test out the touch screen and networking card. The monitor sometimes makes a bit of high-pitch whine which by some miracle I can still hear. Younger folks might find it objectionable. I wonder if it would be effective as a child repellant? :) Thankfully, it doesn't seem to set my dogs to howling.
And now that it is cleaned up and working, I have no clue about what to do with it! I just didn't want to see it go to the landfill or end up as toxic dust in some poor guy's lungs in India, so I got permission and then carted it home. I am not normally interested in PC-family machines, but actual IBM ones interest me a bit. And the countless ways IBM found to make the PS/2 line incompatible with regular PC lines give me things to bitch about, and that in turn gives my life purpose. :)
So, would any of y'all like to help me brainstorm about interesting applications for this vintage heap, or maybe point me towards non-eBay sources of software that it would like to run?
--
Mark J. Blair, NF6X <nf6x at nf6x.net>
http://www.nf6x.net/
Wow...that fired some old brain cells. I saved one of these around
86-87 and had it hooked to a VAX/BSD4 system for a while. All I
really remember about it was that it was pretty well made but after
wasting too much time mucking about I could never finesse a termcap
entry for it that didn't have some more or less annoying corner-case
breakage. I suspected that even though it had a serial port and "VT
compatibility", IBM didn't much want to encourage anyone hooking one
up to a non-IBM system.
KJ
I run Windows 98SE on a 14 year old Pentium III. I have
replaced the power supply twice and all three hard disk drives.
It is a really good system to run the Ersatz-11 emulator for the
PDP-11, specifically RT-11. Since Ersatz-11 has built-in VT100
emulation, I don't need a separate terminal emulator. I also run
Netscape 7.2 for e-mail and newsgroups. And that is all - no
surfing the internet or google of any sort. Incidentally, I use
Ghost 7.0 for backups to DVDs.
Aside from the daylight savings time changing 3 weeks too late
in the spring and a week early in the fall, I really like the system
and I would like to use it for another 20 years. Since I am
77 years old now, I figure that will be just about satisfactory.
The Pentium III hardware is more than a bit of a concern. I would
be very pleased to upgrade to 64-bit Windows 10, but the DOS
variant of Ersatz-11 is not supported and I really would prefer to
keep using Netscape 7.2 since I have over 100,000 e-mails
and posts to newsgroups that it is important to be able to keep.
QUESTION: Is it even possible to run Win98SE on a current
Intel I7 CPU with SATA hard disk drives? I realize that it might
be possible under a virtual machine, but I really want all of the
advantages that Win98SE provides. One problem, of course,
is that there must be a patch to Win98SE when more than 1 GB
of actual physical RAM is present. But I can't seem to find out
anything else.
What leads me to believe that there is a reasonable chance is
that the IDENTICAL 3.5" floppy media is able to boot DOS
>from drive A: and run on both the Pentium III (with a 3.5" HD
floppy drive, of course) AND on a Q9550 Core 2 quad CPU
which also has a 3.5" HD floppy drive which currently runs
64-bit Windows 7 from the C: drive, of course, using three
SATA hard drives where the C: drive has an NTFS file
structure and all the other partitions on all of the SATA drives
have a FAT32 file structure. So without really understanding
the details of the device drivers and the BIOS, it would seem
that the SATA drive hardware and software is compatible.
Ghost 7.0 is a file on the F: drive of the Q9550 CPU
(first extended partition of the 1st physical SATA hard drive).
Ghost is able to take a file produced as a backup image on
the Pentium III system (and copied over the router connecting
the Pentium III and the Q9500 systems - that also provides
internet access for both systems) and re-create the same files
on a specified partition on the Q9550 via the Ghost 7.0
program while the Q9550 is booted from the 3.5" floppy
media.
Since the SATA hard drives on the Q9550 system don't seem
to have a problem with DOS on the floppy, then I have some
hope that Win98SE could manage them as well. Has anyone
experience or knowledge about being able to run Win98SE
using an Intel I7 CPU with SATA hard drives all of them using
a FAT32 file structure?
Alternatively, does it seem reasonable to attempt to keep a
system with a Pentium III CPU and associated hardware
running for another 20 years?
Jerome Fine
VCF East is April 15-17; the exhibit halls are open April 16-17 (April
15 is all tech repair classes -- to be announced soon).
Click here to register an exhibit: http://tinyurl.com/htlfsmh
Hi folks,
I recently picked up a Symbolics system built around an 8" Control Data Corp. Sabre hard drive.
Some files read when I show the FEP directory listing but many show as "Error reading file header, wrong pkid read" which I assume is some sort of FEP FS integrity check.
In short, the drive becomes ready and much of the data appears still there, but I have some brand of consistent read errors that preclude the machine from booting.
It's not a software issue as the machine was deinstalled in a working condition.
Anyone familiar with these terrible drives? Am I totally up the creek? I tried a couple different orientations.
Thanks,
- Ian
Sent from Outlook Mobile
Vetusware is highly unreliable and tries to charge for accounts, which
isn't worth it at all because most of the things I've gotten from there
haven't worked. Try: https://winworldpc.com/library
Their images are tested, I've used the OS/2 Warp 4 images to install on
an old thinkpad 760. I'd also suggest you try some other OSes, Nextstep
3.3 should work (and may have network drivers), as well as Unixware, GEM
(on top of DOS), and possibly even AT&T SVR4 or one of the later Xenix
variants. If you do decide to go with OS/2, you should also be able to
find native applications and development tools there too.
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
I'm currently writing a bit of code for the 4004 at the moment, and playing
with it in the online Javascript emulator found here:
http://e4004.szyc.org/emu/
According to http://e4004.szyc.org/iset.html (which I believe is copied
straight from the MCS-4 Users Manual), the DAA instruction should increment
the accumulator by 6 if carry is set or if the accumulator is greater than
9. Carry should be set following the instruction if the resulting addition
generated a carry; otherwise it's unaffected.
Let's say the accumulator is currently 9, carry is not set. I add another
9. Accumulator is now 2 with a carry. Running DAA should turn this into 8
with carry set, indicating that 9+9=(1)8. Am I thinking through this
correctly?
I ask, because according to the simulator's source code, DAA won't do that,
if I'm following it correctly:
function opDAA() { //DAA Decimal Adjust Accumulator
if(A_reg > 9) A_reg += 6;
C_flag=0; if (A_reg & 0xf0) {A_reg&=0xf; C_flag=1;}
incPC();
}
It says that it'll only add 6 if the accumulator is greater than 9, not if
a carry is already set. It will then reset carry and set it if and only if
there was a carry.
Have I found a bug in the simulator? Am I misreading the MCS-4 Users
Manual?
In any event, this is my proposed fix to better match what the instruction
description says:
function opDAA() { //DAA Decimal Adjust Accumulator
if((A_reg > 9) | (C_flag)) A_reg += 6;
if (A_reg & 0xf0) {A_reg&=0xf; C_flag=1;}
incPC();
}
Seems to work as I would expect it to.
Thanks,
Kyle
>mark at markesystems.com wrote:
>> Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2016 11:44:44 -0500
>> From: "Jerome H. Fine" <jhfinedp3k at compsys.to>
>> Subject: Can Windows 98SE run on an Intel I7 with SATA gard drives?
>>
>> I run Windows 98SE on a 14 year old Pentium III. I have
>> replaced the power supply twice and all three hard disk drives.
>
>> QUESTION: Is it even possible to run Win98SE on a current
>> Intel I7 CPU with SATA hard disk drives? I realize that it might
>> be possible under a virtual machine, but I really want all of the
>> advantages that Win98SE provides. One problem, of course,
>
>
> Almost certainly not, at least practically. Even if you can get it to
> boot and install, it will have no idea how to handle any of the modern
> peripherals, and drivers certainly won't be available. So sound won't
> work, the screen will be limited to VGA-16, and I'm not sure about the
> keyboard and mouse (there's a reasonable chance that the BIOS will
> emulate the legacy PS-2 devices, just as it's abstracting the details
> of the SATA disks).
Then I am really confused. I have two older systems that
are able to run 64-bit Windows 7, an E8400 and a Q9550.
Both take SATA drives which are still available. The mother
boards are ASUS5B. I would guess they are both about
7 years old and I would hope that some of that old hardware
might be a bit easier to find.
I can also still boot from both system using an old DOS 3.5"
floppy media and run Ghost 7.0 with these old SATA drives,
but as far as I can understand, using the device drivers on the
floppy drive.
Is it likely that either of these two systems be able to run
Win98SE with the SATA hard drives, in one case 500 GB
each and the other system has 1 TB drives. In that case, it
would still be possible to use current SATA drives, but the
1 GB limit on physical memory for Win98SE would need
to be patched. By the way, the Pentium III that is 12 years
old has 768 MB of memory, so it is possible to run Win98SE
with more than 500 MB of physical memory.
As I mentioned, the only two applications I would run would
be the DOS variant of Ersatz-11 and Netscape 7.2 for e-mail
and newsgroups.
Jerome Fine
>mark at markesystems.com wrote:
>> Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2016 11:44:44 -0500
>> From: "Jerome H. Fine" <jhfinedp3k at compsys.to>
>> Subject: Can Windows 98SE run on an Intel I7 with SATA gard drives?
>>
>> I run Windows 98SE on a 14 year old Pentium III. I have
>> replaced the power supply twice and all three hard disk drives.
>
>> QUESTION: Is it even possible to run Win98SE on a current
>> Intel I7 CPU with SATA hard disk drives? I realize that it might
>> be possible under a virtual machine, but I really want all of the
>> advantages that Win98SE provides. One problem, of course,
>
> Almost certainly not, at least practically. Even if you can get it to
> boot and install, it will have no idea how to handle any of the modern
> peripherals, and drivers certainly won't be available. So sound won't
> work, the screen will be limited to VGA-16, and I'm not sure about the
> keyboard and mouse (there's a reasonable chance that the BIOS will
> emulate the legacy PS-2 devices, just as it's abstracting the details
> of the SATA disks).
Then I am really confused. I have two older systems that
are able to run 64-bit Windows 7, an E8400 and a Q9550.
Both take SATA drives which are still available. The mother
boards are ASUS5B. I would guess they are both about
7 years old and I would hope that some of that old hardware
might be a bit easier to find.
I can also still boot from both system using an old DOS 3.5"
floppy media and run Ghost 7.0 with these old SATA drives,
but as far as I can understand, using the device drivers on the
floppy drive.
Is it likely that either of these two systems be able to run
Win98SE with the SATA hard drives, in one case 500 GB
each and the other system has 1 TB drives. In that case, it
would still be possible to use current SATA drives, but the
1 GB limit on physical memory for Win98SE would need
to be patched. By the way, the Pentium III that is 12 years
old has 768 MB of memory, so it is possible to run Win98SE
with more than 500 MB of physical memory.
As I mentioned, the only two applications I would run would
be the DOS variant of Ersatz-11 and Netscape 7.2 for e-mail
and newsgroups.
Jerome Fine
Hi Guys
What a week!
First I had to reject a batch of panels because some text was not
centered right.
Then whilst the matt black on the front gave a really nice finish I felt
the resistance to abrasion could be better.
So I've switched to a silk textured surface base material. It mimics the
diffuse layer on the front side of the original board really well. But
of course it resists abrasion better (because its the surface of the
actual material and not just a coating) and also it provides a better
key for the inks to adhere to. It gives the same effect of there being
a front matt black layer as did the original. It looked good on the
sample. It still leaves me the option to put black on the front if needed.
I took the opportunity to add rounded corners and have them drill the
big hole for the key lock
Next the great US snow storm stopped shipments to the US (they are
still not caught up) and then my email stated acting up. Some emails
came through and some didn't.
Any way it looks like I am just about back on track.:
The first batch of predrilled silk textured front panel blanks are due
now and the silk screen shop will run them when they arrive.
The new packaging has arrived. The shippers will start to accept new
parcels for the US on Monday or Tuesday.
Finally they fixed my email late yesterday and its still OK.
Rod