I'm toying with putting the "ultimate" classic Mac together, although I'm
having a little difficulty pinning down the definition of what the ultimate
representation of the type is, so was looking for a little input from
Classic CMP'ers.
I'm aware that there's a clear divide between Motorola and PowerPC CPU'd
variants, so I'm going to plump for a PowerPC based version so that I can
get access to newer hardware and use it as a kind of bridge system between
my current computers and the more historic versions.
In terms of hardware I have a lovely mirror-door G4 PowerMac I'm intending
to use. I have the original media that shipped with this, so I can get
9.2.1 on it relatively easily. Are there any add-in cards (PCI) I should
be considering? It has a built in Airport Card (possibly Airport Extreme?)
although my home Wi-Fi is 802.11n or better with WPA2 so I'll just use
Ethernet to connect it to my LAN. Was a gigabit ethernet card ever
released with Mac OS 9 drivers? I have a couple of 600GB PATA disks that I
can use with it, but has there ever been a SATA implementation that worked
with classic Mac OS?
Also, I have an Asant? ether bridge tucked away somewhere that I hope to be
able to use to connect some of my older Mac OS boxen without Ethernet.
In terms of the software - any top-line utilities or System Extensions I
should look to get my hands on? What's the state of the art in classic Mac
OS browsing nowadays, Mr Kaiser - is Clasilla still maintained?
-Austin.
Liam, thank you so much for this information!
I did not know about all the HACKINTOSH action out there!
Good to hear that one system will use SATA drive > I will just have to
find some old installable OS for it.
The family of the deceased engineer that passed these on to us at the
SMECC Museum project tossed most any paperwork or media , so we have
what is installed on the system and of course for the diskless one we are
empty handed.
We we were out scrounging now I wish I had picked up more vintage MAC
paperwork and discs now.
We saved stuff related to the early MAC and of course ANYTHING we could
find for the APPLE II.
We do also have something that looks like an APPLE LISA but not the
twiggi (sp?) drive model I have heard reference to. it turned on last time I
tried but just a bunch of diddle crap all over the screen. (bogus
contents of memory mapped video or!?? <this machine is a mystery to me I saw
it when it came out but that is abut the only experience I have had with
LISA remember I was a HP guy in the business days... I do remember going
over to a store in Metrocenter in AZ and seeing one for the first time
with a MOUSE on it! I was amazed...
Again... thanks for the hints and help now and in the future.
Ed Sharpe archivist for SMECC _www.smecc.org_ (http://www.smecc.org)
In a message dated 7/18/2016 12:03:32 P.M. US Mountain Standard Time,
lproven at gmail.com writes:
On 18 July 2016 at 20:18, <COURYHOUSE at aol.com> wrote:
Ed, *please* will you get a proper email client? They work fine with
AOL mail. I know, I am also liamproven at aol.com & have been for 20y!
>
> will not load curvet os because?
> "This is caused by the lack of the 64 bit EFI bios. The hardware of the
> Mac Pro 1.1 is already complete 64bit capable but they do ship the efi
bios
> only in 32bit version."
>
> Ed says..... OK whatever an EFI Bios is....
There are ways around it.
http://www.pro-tools-expert.com/home-page/2015/3/2/how-to-resurrect-a-2006-m
ac-pro-11-so-it-can-run-osx-yosemit.html
Ask the Hackintosh community:
http://hq-a.weebly.com/
> ---------------------
> ok we also have a -
>
> "The Power Macintosh G5 shipped from 2003 until 2006. All models pack
> 64-bit PowerPC 970 (G5) processors in an easy-to-upgrade aluminum tower
case
> design with a single external optical drive bay"
>
> This one is missing disc drives... this has the neatest form
fitting
> insides of any of the macs I have seen.
Takes any old SATA drive, as far as I recall. No special firmware needed.
Will run up to OS X 10.5, nothing later.
--
Liam Proven ? Profile: http://lproven.livejournal.com/profile
Email: lproven at cix.co.uk ? GMail/G+/Twitter/Flickr/Facebook: lproven
MSN: lproven at hotmail.com ? Skype/AIM/Yahoo/LinkedIn: liamproven
Cell/Mobiles: +44 7939-087884 (UK) ? +420 702 829 053 (?R)
EEEKK!!! and it is not the one with the Plexiglas surrounds... kaaa
ching..$$$
It does have a nice a/d unit Ed#
In a message dated 7/19/2016 12:07:02 A.M. US Mountain Standard Time,
jwsmail at jwsss.com writes:
On 7/18/2016 10:23 PM, Sam O'nella wrote:
> There may be some archives here or vcf with enough prices. Iirc i
thought i remember one selling for something pretty high (8000/12000?) X years
ago although i think like this it's a calculated price of doubling the last
sale they saw. Although apple 1s seem to accomplish whatever that law is
called :-)
I think Straight 8's are nearly to the point that other systems which
have published tracking inventories. There are very few, this one looks
complete, or near complete.
That said I'd figure though some of the higher prices such as the
current PDP8/I and GT40 are setting for want of bids, they aren't that
far from what you have to pay to get said systems on demand. This one
may go for around the opportunistic price, and be lower, but $10 to $12k
isn't going to be surprising.
There may be some archives here or vcf with enough prices. ?Iirc i thought i remember one selling for something pretty high (8000/12000?) X years ago although i think like this it's a calculated price of doubling the last sale they saw. Although apple 1s seem to accomplish whatever that law is called :-)
I found various DEC (Qbus?) boards at my local tame recycler earlier.
They're scheduled for preprocessing this evening (e.g. ceramic ICs pulled
and diverted into different pile due to higher gold content), but I may be
able to get them a stay of execution (as of now I've got about 2 hours in
which to let him know before I'm awol for a family event).
Anything below strike anyone as being worth saving (vs. common as dirt
serial interfaces etc.)? I'm not sure at the moment if I can rescue the lot...
M7957
M8189
M8192
M8061 x 2
M8044 x 2
M8190
M8043 x 2
M7961
M8067 x 2
M7856
In addition to those, a board branded Dilog CQ1610, another marked PXX-2
with four SC44077P ics in the center, and a memory board marked 980110014
containing 128 mmc3764 RAM ics. Also several Emulex boards which didn't
contain anything that was obviously a part number (from memory a couple
that were "full width" and three that were "half width") - I'm guessing
they're probably tape controllers, but they might be hard disk.
Working status unknown, but cosmetically they looked good. It sounds like
the previous owner had complete machines which he split and scrapped at
some point in the past, and this box of boards had sat around in his garage
since.
cheers
Jules
On Jul 18, 2016 2:30 PM, "Ian S. King" <isking at uw.edu> wrote:
>
> Absent physical trauma, core seems pretty durable. The electronics around
> it may fail but the core planes themselves seem robust. At least that's
> been my experience. -- Ian
There are known cases of IBM System/3 core that had failed beyond practical
repair due to products of decayed air-sealing foam contacting and
dissolving core plane wires.
Mike
Our core in any of our classic 8 has never worked it didn't 30 years ago either. ...... ?just the thought of how many failed components.... yikes! ..... ?something to procrastinate ?about.. ?but I hate to hack out ?buckets of components. ...............
Ed# ?www.smecc.org
Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone
-------- Original message --------
From: "Ian S. King" <isking at uw.edu>
Date: 7/18/16 17:29 (GMT-07:00)
To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts" <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Subject: Re: Straight 8 up on Ebay just now
Absent physical trauma, core seems pretty durable.? The electronics around
it may fail but the core planes themselves seem robust.? At least that's
been my experience.? -- Ian
On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 2:17 PM, Ethan Dicks <ethan.dicks at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 5:02 PM,? <ethan at 757.org> wrote:
> >> 25,000, Alexandria, Va.
> >> Josh Dersch can have one for his home and for work.
> >
> > Is that a dream price for such a system or realistic?
>
> Curious myself.? They don't come up every day.? The description says:
> "Last turned on the lights worked but the memory appeared not to
> work."? I think from posts on similar systems, it could easily be
> dirty marginal switch contacts or PSU issues, etc, vs damaged core.
>
> > I notice the corrosion on the front key.
>
> I'll happily sell him a clean key for a mere 1%...
>
> -ethan
>
--
Ian S. King, MSIS, MSCS, Ph.D. Candidate
The Information School <http://ischool.uw.edu>
Dissertation: "Why the Conversation Mattered: Constructing a Sociotechnical
Narrative Through a Design Lens
Archivist, Voices From the Rwanda Tribunal <http://tribunalvoices.org>
Value Sensitive Design Research Lab <http://vsdesign.org>
University of Washington
There is an old Vulcan saying: "Only Nixon could go to China."
>> I believe these stands to be authentic DEC VT5X stands.? Is there any way
>> of telling for sure?? There are no markings on the stands.
>
>I can't be certain, but the height and the appearance suggest to me
>that they are.
>
>> Here is a picture of the stand:
>> https://drive.google.com/open?id=0BzqkBl9PETyQek51bFlXTU53a1E
The 5-leg stand seems correct to me, the vertical standing pipe
(painted black) seems also OK to me. However, the tray is a different
story. But I have to admit, that my reference is only the VT55-FB on a
roll-around stand. If the stand for the VT55-FB is identical to the
one for the VT52, then the tray is not the original one.
It is not a tray, but just a plate and significantly smaller, but not flat.
I can take pictures on Saturday of my VT55-FB with original stand.
Let me know, because I'd have to remove the VT (6 bolts, IIRC).
- Henk
In a message dated 7/17/2016 9:45:20 P.M. US Mountain Standard Time,
ard at p850ug1.demon.co.uk writes:
> The HPIL thinkjet version was also used with the hp portable and hp
> portable plus laptops.
> we have some of them in the SMECC here... but back when I was
CEO
> Computer Exchange inc we sold lost of these.. it was a small laptop
> with applications in ROM but also had a HPIL 3 1/2 disc and an HPIL
Yes. 80C86 (not 8088) based, there is a 16 bit data bus in there.
The Portable (HP110) has built-in RAM that can't be expanded. One of
the boards contains the processor and a lot of DIP-packaged 8K*8 SRAMs.
The Portable Plus used surface-mount 8K*8 SRAMs and could take more
on a plug-in 'RAM Drawer'.
> Hey!
> Remember to the hp 45 calc.. had HPIL interface also...
I think you mean the HP41 (LCD alphanumeric calculator) or maybe
the HP75 (handheld machine running BASIC, very similar to the HP85
in architecture). The HP45 was a simple-ish non-programmable
scientific calculator with an LED display. And an undocumented
stopwatch
Yes that is the 41 ! I know better! sorry!
sold oddles of 41s to surveyors etc... in the day...
> There was also a gaggle of cards to the PC and the HP 150 TOUCHSCREEN
> that would talk to HPIL and also on IBM side HPIL plus I seem to
> remember HPIB cards too.
The HP150 had HPIB as standard. There was an optional card that
added HPIL and a Centronics port. That Centronics port was a
mess. HP decided to use female DB25s for the serial ports. So to
avoid confusion they used a male DB25 for the Centronics port.
Only problem was the PCB was laid out for a female DB25 using
IBM PC pinouts. With the result that the male version ended up
effectively mirror-reversed, strobe on pin 13, etc.
There were, indeed, HP ISA HPIB and HPIL cards. From memory the
latter (at least) will not run in any reasonbly fast machine (8MHz CPU
clock tops?) There was also an HPIL card for the Integral (portable
unix machine) but I have never seen it. Was there a DIO HPIL card?
[...]
> I may be wrong but I remember a HPIL a HPIB a Parallel and maybe a
> Serial interface version of the HP Thinkjet
I have come across 6 versions :
HPIB, HPIL, RS232, Centronics, Portable (battery powered Centronics) and
IIRC an enhanced version of the RS232 one.
> Now there was another interface not to be confused with the HPIL it was
> called HP HIL HP HUMAN INTERFACE LOOP I remember? it was what the
mouse
> used on the hp 150 etc...
Yes. They are often confused... But very different to the user and
electrically.
> I may still still have my orig HP Thinkjet service training course
I think you can get the service manual for the Thinkjet (probably only
covers the original 4 versions) from the Australian Museum.
-tony
=
thanks for all this info!
great brain refresh!
Ed# _www.smecc.oprg_ (http://www.smecc.oprg)
apples support seems hosed...
Load of URL http://support.apple.com/index.html failed with error code
-310.
but from this page....
https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT202888
there is a good guide.
------------------------------
this is my 1.1
Mac Pro --- MacPro1,1 --- MA356LL/A
it works... it is a good representative artifact too .
will not load curvet os because?
"This is caused by the lack of the 64 bit EFI bios. The hardware of the
Mac Pro 1.1 is already complete 64bit capable but they do ship the efi bios
only in 32bit version."
Ed says..... OK whatever an EFI Bios is.... (( remember this is my first
real exposure to USING a MAC - yes we have a 9 inch screen one in the
museum but have never even used that))
-------
Ha wish it was a
Mac Pro (Early 2008) -- MacPro3,1 --- MA970LL/A
then I could current OS upgrade it.
---------------------
ok we also have a -
"The Power Macintosh G5 shipped from 2003 until 2006. All models pack
64-bit PowerPC 970 (G5) processors in an easy-to-upgrade aluminum tower case
design with a single external optical drive bay"
This one is missing disc drives... this has the neatest form fitting
insides of any of the macs I have seen.
----------------------------
then we have Blue iMAC still in box
------------------------------------
Then we have the old 9 inch one in museum collection.
( I do not see many of these around as I used to)
---------------------------------
thanks for any help and tips Ed# _www.smecc.org_
(http://www.smecc.org)
In a message dated 7/17/2016 7:23:10 P.M. US Mountain Standard Time,
spectre at floodgap.com writes:
> that is interesting to know the old os can be run under the newer.
> I am confused on some of the G5 stuff.
> there is a real early one that has non intel processor
> then there is a 1.1 ( i have one too) but you can not upgrade to the
> latest os (bummer)
>
> then there is the G% 3 or 3.3 dated one that will run currect os
too.
>
> is there a way to force the 1.1 one to run currest os somehow!?
I'm not sure what you're referring to. If the 1.1 is clock speed, the
slowest G5 is 1.6GHz. No Power Mac can run anything past 10.5.8; there is
no PowerPC code left in the kernel to run.
--
------------------------------------ personal:
http://www.cameronkaiser.com/ --
Cameron Kaiser * Floodgap Systems * www.floodgap.com * ckaiser at floodgap.com
-- Don't be humble ... you're not that great. -- Golda Meir
-------------------
Low End Mac looks into the history of the effort to produce a Motif-based,
clean-room Mac compatible computer in the early nineties.
http://lowendmac.com/2016/nutek-mac-clones/
--
Sent from my phone - please pardon brevity & typos.
Did MS-DOS use code copied from CP/M? Forensic software engineer Bob
Zeidman said "no" in 2012 but now he has new research to disclose at VCF
West.
That's all I can say for now. :)
that is interesting to know the old os can be run under the newer.
I am confused on some of the G5 stuff.
there is a real early one that has non intel processor
then there is a 1.1 ( i have one too) but you can not upgrade to the
latest os (bummer)
then there is the G% 3 or 3.3 dated one that will run currect os too.
is there a way to force the 1.1 one to run currest os somehow!?
Ed#
In a message dated 7/17/2016 12:47:17 P.M. US Mountain Standard Time,
cmhanson at eschatologist.net writes:
On Jul 15, 2016, at 1:49 PM, Austin Pass <austinpass at gmail.com> wrote:
> I have several G5's, but am at a loss as to what to do with them. If
they supported classic Mac OS I'd have one up and running in a heartbeat.
You can't boot MacOS 9 on them, but you can run Classic under 10.4 on a G5
and it screams.
-- Chris
What a flash back...
(SMECC is always looking for anything related to these products)
The HPIL thinkjet version was also used with the hp portable and hp
portable plus laptops.
we have some of them in the SMECC here... but back when I was CEO
Computer Exchange inc we sold lost of these.. it was a small laptop
with applications in ROM but also had a HPIL 3 1/2 disc and an HPIL
Hey!
Remember to the hp 45 calc.. had HPIL interface also...
There was also a gaggle of cards to the PC and the HP 150 TOUCHSCREEN
that would talk to HPIL and also on IBM side HPIL plus I seem to
remember HPIB cards too.
THANK YOU FOR THE INK WARNINGS!
I did not know about the corrosive qualities of the ink and did not
realize the glycerol content...
I may be wrong but I remember a HPIL a HPIB a Parallel and maybe a
Serial interface version of the HP Thinkjet
Now there was another interface not to be confused with the HPIL it was
called HP HIL HP HUMAN INTERFACE LOOP I remember? it was what the mouse
used on the hp 150 etc...
I may still still have my orig HP Thinkjet service training course
... we were also a service center for a bunch of the HP PC products and
some manuals from classes I attended or my staff attended I saved and they
are in the glassed in HP lock up area where the 2000 access and the hp
micro and mini stuff lives.
I have a bunch of odd VECTRA internals manuals too...
Just wish I had saved more of this stuff...
We also have an HP INTEGRAL (sp?) Unix all in one computer printer
combo... cool concept it has THINKJET printer built in the top of it too.
we never sold this product but SMECC was given a prototype many years
later...
REMEMBER TOO.... THINKJET printers always printed best on "special hp
thinkjet paper"
Ed# _www.smecc.org_ (http://www.smecc.org)
In a message dated 7/17/2016 12:15:58 P.M. US Mountain Standard Time,
mhs.stein at gmail.com writes:
>> for some incomprehensible reason, you can still order brand new
cartridges from... Staples!
Another thanks for the tip; I've got an HP2225B (HP-IL, with RS-232
converter) which presumably uses the same cartridge. Will have to check it out.
m
----- Original Message -----
From: "Curious Marc" <curiousmarc3 at gmail.com>
To: "General Discussion: On-Topic Posts" <cctech at classiccmp.org>
Sent: Sunday, July 17, 2016 3:19 AM
Subject: Re: Found some stuff at the scrapyard
You got yourself the first consumer inkjet printer ever, from 1984:
https://youtu.be/UiHNymmxKWs
Original "A" version with HP-IB interface, useless for regular PCs of
course. Complete with the "SomethingJet" marketing name that has been with us
since then. The key innovation of that printer was the disposable cartridge
with the micro-machined nozzles, which they had a horrendous time
manufacturing at first. And for some incomprehensible reason, you can still order
brand new cartridges from... Staples! Just put a new one in and you should be
good to go.
Marc
Sent from my iPad
> On Jul 17, 2016, at 12:34 PM, devin davison <lyokoboy0 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Actually found a pretty nice hp machine with a bunch of peripherals.
> Thankfully it came with the keyboard. Also a external hard drive and
> floppy, as well as a tiny printer.
>
> HP 362 "controller"
> Hp thinkjet 2225A printer
> Hp 9153B - HD and floppy
>
> Also a IBM wheelwriter 3 with the parallel interface, as well as what im
> assuming is a s100 backplane.
>
> Pretty interesting. I have a couple of other Hp devices, a logic
analizer,
> pattern generator, and volt meter, it will be interesting to see if i can
> get them talking with the computer. Computer works. boots into basic.
> Pretty complete setup for something at the scrapyard.
>
> https://www.slashflash.info/~devin/images/scrapyard_lot/
>
> --Devin
opps sorry many typos... see clarification interlaced..
In a message dated 7/17/2016 8:04:07 P.M. US Mountain Standard Time,
cmhanson at eschatologist.net writes:
That would be a PowerMac G5. No Power Macintosh has an Intel processor
yes that is first g5 has a more elegant interior design! I need a
disk for this have no disc have no software but have nice system.
then there is a 1.1 ( i have one too) but you can not upgrade to the
> latest os (bummer)
By "1.1" do you mean the Mac Pro? The Mac Pro has always had an Intel
processor, and the model code for the first Mac Pro was MacPro1,1.
1.1" do you mean the Mac Pro yea this runs nice and has 2 drive and
7 gig mem
> then there is the G% 3 or 3.3 dated one that will run current os
too.
This is confusing. Can you restate it or at least correct your typos
before posting? There's no G3 that can run the latest macOS, since a G3 is a
kind of PowerPC CPU.
G5 version 3 vrs the earlier 1.1 i
> is there a way to force the 1.1 one to run currest os somehow!?
Not any supported way, which is the only way I'd be allowed to discuss.
From: Brent Hilpert <hilpert at cs.ubc.ca>
> I don't think I've ever seen a wirewrapped S100 backplane, they were
> pretty much all PCB.
For what it's worth, I've seen many WW S-100 backplanes, especially
>from the days when it was common to assemble your own systems from
parts/kits, and before S-100 was a "standard".
KJ
Hi Jules
I found removing my QX-10's battery stopped the machines working. I tried
replacing it with a lithium battery after disabling the recharging circuit
but that didn't work either.
The old battery doesn't show any signs of leaking so I just left it in
there. I check all my machines with batteries once a year for any battery
leakage so I'm comfortable with leaving it there.
Terry ( Tez)
On 18/07/2016 6:38 am, "Jules Richardson" <jules.richardson99 at gmail.com>
wrote:
>
>
> There's a battery in my QX-10; anyone know if it's safe to remove it
before it leaks (i.e. it's not responsible for storing any parameters which
might be vital to system operation)?
>
> I think most of my machines which have batteries just use them for things
such as TOD clock and so it's no big deal to remove them (and they'll run
happily without), but I do also have various "unknowns" - of which the
QX-10 is one.
>
> (I don't suppose anyone is working on a big list of machines with
batteries in, which ones need consideration before removal, and which ones
refuse to function without a battery present, are they?)
>
> cheers
>
> Jules
> On Thu, 14 Jul 2016, Sean Conner wrote:
>> What I've read about VMS makes me think the networking was
>> incredible.
>
>
To be fair, I think you have to think about what was around when VMS
was developed, and what DEC was competing with. VMS is an
enterprise-grade operating system, designed for serious production work.
At the time VMS was conceived, Unix was a university product, used for
teaching and research, not for heavy production work. In fact those
early versions of Unix were completely useless for that kind of
application - too limited, unstable, and no useful security features. No
accounting at all, no useful batch functionality, nothing but the most
basic kind of security and protection functionality etc.
VMS was designed to compete with IBM mainframes and System/32-34-36 and
the likes.
In the early 80s I used both VMS version 4 and 5 and Unix version 7.
The Unix system was used for program development, the VMS system for
program development and running accounting software. The Unix system was
fine for program development in a lab but far too unstable and insecure
for running accounting systems in a corporate production environment.
> Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2016 23:34:22 -0400
> From: devin davison <lyokoboy0 at gmail.com>
> To: "General Discussion: On-Topic Posts" <cctech at classiccmp.org>
> Subject: Found some stuff at the scrapyard
> Message-ID:
> <CAOpB=UN9zNQ0Aj-z-
> 7+jLTP76KheCFdu31YWpowXvMsdqSVkAg at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> Actually found a pretty nice hp machine with a bunch of peripherals.
> Thankfully it came with the keyboard. Also a external hard drive and
floppy,
> as well as a tiny printer.
>
> HP 362 "controller"
> Hp thinkjet 2225A printer
> Hp 9153B - HD and floppy
>
> Also a IBM wheelwriter 3 with the parallel interface, as well as what im
> assuming is a s100 backplane.
I don't know what it is, but S100 it isn't. A key feature of the S100 bus is
100 pins, not 122.
James
There's a battery in my QX-10; anyone know if it's safe to remove it before
it leaks (i.e. it's not responsible for storing any parameters which might
be vital to system operation)?
I think most of my machines which have batteries just use them for things
such as TOD clock and so it's no big deal to remove them (and they'll run
happily without), but I do also have various "unknowns" - of which the
QX-10 is one.
(I don't suppose anyone is working on a big list of machines with batteries
in, which ones need consideration before removal, and which ones refuse to
function without a battery present, are they?)
cheers
Jules
Don't see too many complete looking BA123 boxes show up on eBay and
this one seems relatively cheap if you happen to be able to pick it up
locally in Richboro, Pennsylvania. Plus a few boxes of VMS
documentation too.
http://www.ebay.com/itm/232013130536
(No personal connection to, or information about, this seller)
I would grab this one myself if it was within easy driving distance.
Someone should grab it.
Hello.
I've recently acquired what came to be a Siemens PC-MX2 Set that is
comprised of:
* 4 Siemens Dossiers named:
- Informix
- BetriebeSystem SINIX Buch 1
- BetriebeSystem SINIX Buch 2 Menus
- Siemens PC-MX2 Betriebsanleitung
12 Tapes:
- 10 of them are of brand 3M, Model DC300XL/P and seem to be backups.
- 2 of them are of brand Cadmus, Model 9000 and are named:
"Munix Betriebsystem V.3/R.3-28 IS Format
Anlagennummer FO/90-9754"
and the other
"Optionale Pakete PCS
F0/89-74343 IS0055P 20-Jul-89
all files CPIO format
0. Med v.4.0
1. Munix_TCP/IP_(BSD) 7-Sep-88
2. Fortran77-32 V.4.0c"
1 Siemens branded Terminal with Serial Keyboard
1 Siemens Computer branded PC-9870
1 Siemens Dot Matrix Printer model is either PT88S-22 or -32
Is there any interest in this? I'm entertaining offers.
Location is Portugal.
Cumprimentos - Best Regards
Marcos Alves.
Whats this "BackInTheDay" stuff ? ;-) ?granted we upgraded to openvms at y2k, but the system ?is still in production. ? Ive been involved in this app since 93, and it was mature then. ?Just will not die :-(
-------- Original message --------
From: jnc at mercury.lcs.mit.edu
Date: 07/16/2016 05:55 (GMT-08:00)
To: cctalk at classiccmp.org
Cc: jnc at mercury.lcs.mit.edu
Subject: Re: VMS stability back in the day (was Re: NuTek Mac comes)
??? > From: Jonas
??? > At the time VMS was conceived, Unix was a university product, used for
??? > teaching and research, not for heavy production work.
Err, not quite. In the mid-70's, the PWB system at Bell:
? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PWB/UNIX
was being used by a community of about 1K programmers doing development of
software for various Bell commercial projects.
Yes, not accounting systems, but not "teaching and research", either. And it
was definitely production: see the uptime statistics, etc, in the BSTJ
article that describes it.
Noel
> From: Jonas
> At the time VMS was conceived, Unix was a university product, used for
> teaching and research, not for heavy production work.
Err, not quite. In the mid-70's, the PWB system at Bell:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PWB/UNIX
was being used by a community of about 1K programmers doing development of
software for various Bell commercial projects.
Yes, not accounting systems, but not "teaching and research", either. And it
was definitely production: see the uptime statistics, etc, in the BSTJ
article that describes it.
Noel
> From: Kirk Davis
> Does anyone know off hand if a 11/83 cab kit will work as a 11/44
> console? Both are 20 bin ribbon cable connectors
Say what? The 20-pin connector on the M8190 (KDJ11-B) is configuration
management, etc - the console connector is the 10-pin one (which uses the
standard DEC later serial pinout, documented here:
http://gunkies.org/wiki/DEC_asynchronous_serial_line_pinout
if anyone needs it). The 11/44 console (and TU58) seem (from a quick glance at
the prints) to use some odd pinout that is sui generis.
Time to break out the soldering iron...
Noel
I am following this closely ?as we were recently given?A g4 ... not the mirror frontA g4 .... mirror frontA g5 1st model drive missing nice internalsA g5 w Intel but not 3. So Cann not update to free latest ?os..is there a workaround ..internal design us not as cool as first g5
We have just what is on disc drive in them.. need to collect up a few things.
Then we already had blue iMac already in boxPlus early little screen mac wife used
This mac stuff is all new to me so learning curve...
Ed# ?www.smecc.org
Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone
-------- Original message --------
From: Cameron Kaiser <spectre at floodgap.com>
Date: 7/15/16 23:39 (GMT-07:00)
To: cctalk at classiccmp.org
Subject: Re: Building the Ultimate Classic Mac.
> I'm toying with putting the "ultimate" classic Mac together, although I'm
> having a little difficulty pinning down the definition of what the ultimate
> representation of the type is, so was looking for a little input from
> Classic CMP'ers.
My "heavy duty" OS 9 rig is an dual 1.25GHz MDD that I upgraded to a dual
Sonnet 1.8GHz, with 1.5GB RAM and OS 9.2.2. Everything flies on it. I haven't
had any obvious compatibility problems.
Al makes a good point though: have a spare power supply. My MDD blew
through two.
You didn't ask, but my preferred heavy duty 68K is the Q800. You can
overclock them easily with chipclips and they are the beefiest 68K Mac
that will still run A/UX. A/UX at 40MHz is a delight.
> In terms of hardware I have a lovely mirror-door G4 PowerMac I'm intending
> to use.? I have the original media that shipped with this, so I can get
> 9.2.1 on it relatively easily.? Are there any add-in cards (PCI) I should
> be considering?? It has a built in Airport Card (possibly Airport Extreme?)
> although my home Wi-Fi is 802.11n or better with WPA2 so I'll just use
> Ethernet to connect it to my LAN.? Was a gigabit ethernet card ever
> released with Mac OS 9 drivers?? I have a couple of 600GB PATA disks that I
> can use with it, but has there ever been a SATA implementation that worked
> with classic Mac OS?
I've never seen a GigE card for OS 9. There is of course 100Mbit support.
I would love to be proven wrong.
The Sonnet SATA cards work well with OS 9 and are completely bootable. I
used such a card in a 7300.
> In terms of the software - any top-line utilities or System Extensions I
> should look to get my hands on?? What's the state of the art in classic Mac
> OS browsing nowadays, Mr Kaiser - is Clasilla still maintained?
Sort of, as I have time. I'd like to do more with it but TenFourFox consumes
much of my free hacking cycles currently. That should let up relatively soon
since I've made the executive decision to fork TenFourFox at Firefox 45ESR
(due to the looming spectre of Rust becoming a build-requirement, and
known and expected issues with Electrolysis multi-process with the 10.4 SDK).
Still, the biggest need for Classilla currently is moar crypto and that's
rather hard to get right.
--
------------------------------------ personal: http://www.cameronkaiser.com/ --
? Cameron Kaiser * Floodgap Systems * www.floodgap.com * ckaiser at floodgap.com
-- Know what I hate most?? Rhetorical questions. -- Henry N. Camp -------------
Evidently, there is a kind soul with a project this weekend lacking a
cable (it's my fault), and I had hoped one might be available near he
could borrow.
Jim
--
Jim Brain
brain at jbrain.comwww.jbrain.com
I have a nice VT52, but it sits on the floor right now... I would
dearly love to track down one of the old roll-around pedestals for it
(as pictured here: http://cdn4.static.ovimg.com/m/04jldl).
Didn't happen to see one in the warehouse by any chance, did you Todd? :-)
cheers,
--FritzM.
Well, I accidentally ordered two VT100 tubes, so this weekend I tried to restore the one
I have, only to discover the keyboard is missing 3 keytops ("</,", PF2, and PF4). If someone
has one in their spares pile (missing other keytops..) in the US, I could use them.
Also, I'd like to try to find an HP 2392 terminal with or w/o keyboard if someone has a spare.
Asking for a friend... ;-)
An old buddy of mine picked up a PDP-11/73 at auction and we just went
over it tonight - cleaned out some spilled toner from some careless
stacking in a warehouse, and looked over the RL02 on top and it all
seems complete and good to go, except... the connector on the I/O
bulkhead was broken off (the ears and screws remain) and the BC06R
40-pin cable is sticking out. The drive-to-drive cable is there and
looks intact, but there's nothing at the CPU end to clamp it to.
These get brought up from time to time as people refurb 1980s PDP-11s
and such - The easiest place to get these from is dead RL02 drives,
since there are two off them on the back of each drive. Does anyone
have a loose one to sell?
Also as mentioned from time to time, the part number seems to be
obscure and buried, but it's a component in a C-AD-7012415-0-0
"transition bracket assembly", which appears to be this 40-pin ZIF
connector attacked to a rack-mountable metal bracket. All he needs is
the plastic bit, but if it comes attached to a bracket, then that's OK
too.
Yes, I know we can get him operational with a long 40-pin cable. I'd
just like to replace the one missing bit.
Thanks!
-ethan
> From: Greg Stark
> It doesn't seem reasonable to me for you to request buyers provide you
> with a list of what they would be interested in
It might seem more reasonable if you'd seen his basement... :-)
Noel
> From: Devin Davison
> I have a spare unibus chasis and am have been looking for a cpu card
> for a while.
Umm, those CPUs are all QBUS CPUs, not UNIBUS. Was your "unibus" a typo for
'QBUS'? If not, all those CPU boards are, alas, of no use to you.
> The memory boards M8067, real time clock M7856, and serial card M8043
> are of interest.
Likewise most of these boards are QBUS, the M7856 being the only UNIBUS one.
Noel
I haven't built or marketed anything myself but i believe if i understood ?correctly from several folks who have that vga was a cheaper choice due to licensing costs for dvi or hdmi at the time.?
Not sure if vga is past that point or open but when keeping home brew kits cheap for us hobbyists every dollar counts.
It would be interesting maybe as a Wikipedia page (thought there was one) to show which projects were out there and preferably which are still active. ?A shrinking but understandable issue when buying ?im batches with personal money in hopes that theyll sell eventually.
<snip hopefully>
I thought it had said CP/M code in DOS? Revisited..." Sometimes I really think I'm dyslexic.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cctalk [mailto:cctalk-bounces at classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Evan Koblentz
> Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2016 10:45 PM
> To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
> Subject: DOS code in CP/M? Revisited...
>
> Did MS-DOS use code copied from CP/M?
>
Get ready for mind blown moment. ... ;-) you were right both times! {Insert dramatic ground hog clip}
-------- Original message --------
<attempted phone technology snip>
The thing about the Amiga was its wow factor -- I remember
walking into Compucentre (Canadian chain) in the mid-80s.. and there's all
the computers from 8 bit heaven and their 16 color graphics (if you were
lucky).. and then there's this one computer on a pedestal featuring a
totally real jungle cat prowling onscreen. It just blew the doors off
everything else there, and I would go wanting for one for 20 years afterward
(now I have 5 :)). Not sure a replica can revive *that*.
</snip>
Thats an awesome story and experience that unfortunately i agree is hard to relay to people these days. To see how great lots of classics were during their heyday in comparison to what was out is what made so many historic memories.
I think its unfortunately harder for younger generation sometimes to put away their cinematic quality vr and experience vintage gaming for what it was. Graphics drawn by programming, music while gaming, going for blocks and blips to fully animated sprites and tracked music playing all while fitting on a floppy disk.
Or even the wealth and size of the virtual text world at a terminal or personal computer. Preaching to the choir here but when i did finally get around to showing selections of systems at our past vcf it was a blast and i enjoyed showing some of the comparison of commodore to some pc ascii games but also being fair and switching out to some of my favorite dos games too as well as pointing out the crispness of the pc display for text making it a probable better system out of the box for staring at text all day.
I miss closer vcfs :-(
-----Original Message-----
From: cctalk [mailto:cctalk-bounces at classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Guy Sotomayor Jr
Sent: Monday, June 20, 2016 4:04 PM
To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
Subject: Re: How do they make Verilog code for unknown ICs?
What you can do (and I?ve seen it done) is define verilog modules that provide the functions of the IC and use that in their designs. I?ve seen at least two interesting classic computer recreations using this approach (re-implemenation of the CADR lisp machine in verilog and an IBM 360/30 in verilog).
ROMs are easy (just instantiate a lookup table). PLCs are just combinatorial equations which are relatively easy with the verilog ?assign? statement.
TTFN - Guy
====****====
Do you have a pointer to that "IBM 360/30 in Verilog", Guy?
-----
paul
> From: Jules Richardson
> I just told the guy to hold off on execution and I'm going back in next
> week with a view to just buying everything
Good call. Most of those cards are worth something to someone. (E.g. I'd be
interested in the CPU's, the RLV12s, the DLV11-Js, and the M8067s - which are
MSV11-Ps. But I'll let others grab them all first, they'd only be extra
spares, for me.)
They usually sell for $30-$100+ (for the rarer ones, like the M8190 - that's
the KDJ11-B, used in both the 11/83 and 11/84). If either the M8190 or the
M8192 has the optional FPU chip, the FPJ11, that is worth big dineros.
The only exception is the M8044 - those are pretty low-value (I use them only
as test boards for working on broken systems), since they are Q18 _only_, and
can't be mixed with Q22 boards. So maybe $10 each, for those.
Noel
I have a big load of DEC items coming in within the next month or two,
probably a 24 foot truck packed, and an even larger one one possible this
fall.
I already have a 25 foot storage unit costing me a small fortune, and will
probably need another.
I need to sell off as many boxes, boards and terminals, and printers. This
includes numerous most Q bus boxes, all vaxes, and a few 8-E boxes without
covers and maybe slides.
I am trying to keep the weeks before and after VCF free of medical
appointments. I should be able to drop off items there, ship most,
including overseas. You are always welcome to stop by as long as its pre
scheduled, and too many people at once could complicate things.I think the
members who have stopped here in the past have had a good time picking and
chatting.
Please send me any requests off list.
Thanks, Paul
Hi,
I've been looking for a KK8E for some time now. It's the set of two
boards: M8340/M8341. If you have one to sell me please contact me off
list.
I'm also interested in hints that can lead me to one.
I'll give them a good home.
/Anders
I need to obtain a link to the DEC Permission to Copy Out-Of-Print
manuals. Might it still be at an HP site? Specifically, while just the
actual permission itself will be helpful, more important is to be able
to show that it still comes from an official source.
I saw the Permission Notice in the past a few times, but I never
bothered to keep a copy. Did anyone at least keep a copy?
I would imagine that bitsavers might have a copy, so that would
at least be helpful.
Jerome Fine
Hi all
Does anyone have a mirror of bode.ee.ualberta.ca or know where I can find one?
Sheesh the internet's supposed to be a repository but stuff is
disappearing off of it like there's a black hole somewhere.
W
Well Done a nice tour! Terry!
Ed#
In a message dated 7/12/2016 10:02:09 P.M. US Mountain Standard Time,
terry at webweavers.co.nz writes:
In case anyone is interested:
https://youtu.be/JrBqqL6VS6M
Terry (Tez)
On Sat, 9 Jul 2016 cctalk-request at classiccmp.org wrote:
[talk about word processors, specifically WordPerfect]
I would LOVE to find a (hobbyist) copy of WordPerfect for OpenVMS some
day. Back in the day I could fly through those key combos on WP 5.1 ...
Fred
On 2016-07-10 07:00 PM, cctalk-request at classiccmp.org wrote:
>
> Greetings
>
> I have a restored and (I think) functional PDT-150 with dual 8? floppy drives but no software. I do have some blank 8? diskettes but no real means of transferring an operating system or (say) a word processing program onto them.
>
> Any assistance would be appreciated. Happy to pay for OS/Application diskettes and freight etc
The PDT-150 was also sold with a VT-105 as the MiniMINC and can run some
versions of RT-11 (at least V3b). On my site there are images of disks,
but it requires a PC capable of writing single density format to an 8"
disk. IMD is not the most common format in DEC circles, but it is in PC
land.
http://fjkraan.home.xs4all.nl/comp/miniminc/floppyImages/
>
> Many thanks
> Brendan
Greetings & success,
Fred Jan Kraan
Hi Al,
I have a 7201-2 set that I scanned. They're ~64 MB TIF files per sheet,
about ~150GB in total. I can upload those where ever you want.
Op 11 jul. 2016 6:58 p.m. schreef "Al Kossow" <aek at bitsavers.org>:
On 7/11/16 9:14 AM, Jon Elson wrote:
> The microcode was in the ALD drawings, and might even be in bitsavers
archive, if they have the right manual.
>
360 CPU ALDs are extremely difficult to find.
If the 65 set could be scanned, I'd be happy to upload them to bitsavers.
Greetings
I have a restored and (I think) functional PDT-150 with dual 8? floppy drives but no software. I do have some blank 8? diskettes but no real means of transferring an operating system or (say) a word processing program onto them.
Any assistance would be appreciated. Happy to pay for OS/Application diskettes and freight etc
Many thanks
Brendan
--------------//----------------
brendan at mcneill.co.nz
+64 21 881 883
Stated Tothwolf tothwolf at concentric.net:
"Both contact surfaces must also be the same material or tin oxide will form
on the surface of the gold plating and cause a major headache. This was a
serious problem with 486 and earlier Pentium PCs with 30 and 72 pin SIMMs
and it led to a number of lawsuits."
Almost every DEC System Unit ("backplane") that I've ever seen uses
tinned-contacts, yet the Modules all use gold-plated fingers.
How does that situation jibe with the SIMM issue/experience?
-----
paul
I've now got a TI Silent 700 Model 763, and it is partially working.
The previous owner said that the line advance wasn't working reliably,
but that otherwise it was working. As I received it, the thermal print
head is only darkening the top scan line of characters, and only
partially. The intensity pot is already at maximum. The line advance
is working, but carriage return is unreliable, which results in the
carriage banging against the right side of the mechanism and getting
stuck there. The horizontal carriage positioning is done by stepper
motor with an encoder for feedback, so I'm surprised that it isn't
smart enough to recognize that it can't home the carriage, and avoid
ramming it into the right end of the mechanism.
I was worried that the thermal print head might be damaged. I opened
it up and found that it uses the solenoid line advance mechansim,
probably the same as is documented for the early production of Model
743/745. (Later 743/745 use a stepper motor for line advance.) With
power off, the carriage can be manually returned to the left side.
There were two loose parts inside, a spring and a small knob. These
apparently belong to the solenoid line advance mechanism, belonging on
the shaft at the opposite end of the solenoid from the link to the
pivot.
There are screws on the left and right end of the mechanism, which
when loosened, allow the printhead to be moved up and down relative to
the mechanism. The Model 743/745 maintenance manual suggests adjusting
that if characters aren't fully visible. I tried that, and could see a
little bit more of the characters, but couldn't adjust it to get the
characters entirely visible.
I accidentally discovered that with a small amount of additional
pressure against the carriage assembly, toward the paper path, the
characters are printed fully formed, and (quite suprisingly to me) the
carriage return works properly as well.
If I can't get this working reliably, I may start searching for a 743
or 745 with the solenoid line advance mechanism, to try a mechanism
transplant. (The mechanism with stepper motor line advance is not
interchangeable, and requires a different circuit board. I'm not sure
whether that mechanism was used in any model 763/765 units.)
The Operating Instructions manual for the Model 763 and 765 gives
information on 13 different commands which are accepted in command
mode. They mention the TEST command, which performs a self-test, and
the TEST INIT subcommand which resets everything to factory defaults.
There's a TEST MASK subcommand not documented in the manual which
allows examining or altering the bubble memory minor loop masks. When
installing or replacing a bubble memory module, it may be necessary to
enter this information for the new module, from the mask data printed
on the label of the bubble device.
Unlike the later Intel bubble memory, the TI parts (at least of the
92Kbit devices) don't have a specified dedicated "boot loop" to store
the mask, nor do they have a defined synchronization pattern to
provide a detectable home position, so the TMS5502/TMS9916 bubble
controller chip has to ensure that the device is rotated to the home
position on power down or power fail. The terminal firmware may be
using a specific normal minor loop, probably the first or last loop,
to store the mask and a sync pattern, but the TMS5502/TMS9916 don't
provide any automation for that. The TMS5502/TMS9916 also require
that the mask bits be provided in a bit-serial fashion at the precise
times needed during data transfers; TI app notes show the mask stored
in PROM with a counter for addressing, but the 763/765 terminal
doesn't do that. I'm not sure whether they have dedicated logic for
the mask, or whether it's being done by firmware.
The TEST MASK subcommand is probably documented in the Maintenance
Manual, which I don't have; the only reason I know about it is that a
technician left a printout showing the TEST MASK output for this
terminal between two pages of the Operating Instructions manual.
The terminal uses a TMS9980 microprocessor, which is an 8-bit-bus
version of the TMS9900, which can only address 16KB of memory. The
terminal has five TMS4732 4KB ROMS, as well as some RAM, so there must
be some bank-switching going on.
The bubble memory modules for the terminal came in two types:
1) A large "discrete" bubble module with one 92Kbit bubble device and
a whole lot of non-bubble-specific chips (presumably because the
SN753xx bubble memory support chips were not yet available for
production). Two large modules are fitted, to provide the terminal's
basic rated storage capacity of 20K characters (actually up to 22,860
characters if 18, 36, or 72 character record lengths are used). This
leaves no room for additional bubble modules. The modules show up to
the TEST MASK command as modules 2 and 6.
2) A small bubble module with two 92Kbit bubble devices and the
SN753xx bubble memory support chips. A single module provides the 20K
(22860 character) basic rated storage. Up to four of these modules can
be fitted, for up to 80K (91,440) characters.
My terminal had two large bubble modules installed. A friend gave me
three more large modules, which have been treated roughly, so they
have bent pins and possibly damaged components. I have one small
module that came from eBay some years ago. I haven't tried any of them
yet.
right on!
In a message dated 7/10/2016 6:46:28 P.M. US Mountain Standard Time,
elson at pico-systems.com writes:
On 07/10/2016 01:58 PM, Al Kossow wrote:
>
> On 7/10/16 1:14 AM, Paul Birkel wrote:
>
>> Almost every DEC System Unit ("backplane") that I've ever seen uses
>> tinned-contacts, yet the Modules all use gold-plated fingers.
>>
> I'm not near one right now, but there should be gold plating on the
finger in the DEC
> connector block at the point of contact with the pcb edge connector.
It's easier to
> see on the VAX era blocks.
>
>
Absolutely. The WW pins were tinned, but there was
selective gold plating on the card edge contact fingers.
It would take a strong light and magnifier to see it down
inside the connector, but you can rest assured the contact
was gold-gold.
Jon
Just re-subscribed to cc-talk. I'm wondering if anyone has an answer on
this - every now and again I get these warning emails about 'excessive
bounces'. I have to click a link and then they go away for a while. But
sometimes I get busy and forget.. and then the list unsubscribes me. No
idea what 'excessive bounces' means or what I can do to prevent it from
unsubscribing. Any thoughts?
Brad
Hey guys,
Getting closer to the 'construction' phase of my TVT replica. I already
built a mockup the case and reconfigured and painted the MDS keyboard I
found to match the prototypes. I also got some 'natural' colored PCB stock
and etched some boards. Pretty happy with the results. Hard to tell if I
got the right color or not.. I notice in photos my boards look closer to the
color of the original than they appear to me 'in person'.
Anyway, I remember Nick Allen was kind enough to post that photo of his TVT
unit - I meant to ask at the time, are there any more pictures of it,
especially from underneath? Or is there anyone else out there with photos
of original TVTs (not to be confused with the later CT1024)? I'm finding
the few pictures I can find of assembled TVTs very valuable in answering
assembly and part questions.
The blog of my progress on my TVT is here for those interested:
http://bradhodge.ca/blog/?cat=11
Thanks again!
Brad
I just resubmit each time and check the archive in case I missed
something.
works ok this way. never missed anything life changing.
Ed#
In a message dated 7/10/2016 12:42:20 P.M. US Mountain Standard Time,
robert.jarratt at ntlworld.com writes:
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cctalk [mailto:cctalk-bounces at classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Brad H
> Sent: 10 July 2016 19:34
> To: 'General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts'
> <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
> Subject: 'Bounces'
>
> Just re-subscribed to cc-talk. I'm wondering if anyone has an answer on
this -
> every now and again I get these warning emails about 'excessive bounces'.
I
> have to click a link and then they go away for a while. But sometimes I
get
> busy and forget.. and then the list unsubscribes me. No idea what
'excessive
> bounces' means or what I can do to prevent it from unsubscribing. Any
> thoughts?
>
>
This has affected me recently, and another friend of mine also dropped off
the list for the same reason.
Regards
Rob
yes it had just tossed my email address too so I re subed
maybe it does the dump all at once of us dumpees? Ed#
In a message dated 7/10/2016 11:34:25 A.M. US Mountain Standard Time,
vintagecomputer at bettercomputing.net writes:
Just re-subscribed to cc-talk. I'm wondering if anyone has an answer on
this - every now and again I get these warning emails about 'excessive
bounces'. I have to click a link and then they go away for a while. But
sometimes I get busy and forget.. and then the list unsubscribes me. No
idea what 'excessive bounces' means or what I can do to prevent it from
unsubscribing. Any thoughts?
Brad
actually some DEC backplane had gold dos inside on finders of
backplane
and in one instance we had a 8i that has all gold plated everything on the
backplance and heavy gold too.
back in the days - - Ed Sharpe retired CEO Computer Exchange Inc Phx
In a message dated 7/10/2016 12:30:30 P.M. US Mountain Standard Time,
tothwolf at concentric.net writes:
On Sun, 10 Jul 2016, Jon Elson wrote:
> On 07/10/2016 12:07 PM, Paul Koning wrote:
>> On Jul 10, 2016, at 9:07 AM, Tothwolf <tothwolf at concentric.net> wrote:
>>> On Sun, 10 Jul 2016, Paul Birkel wrote:
>>>> Stated Tothwolf tothwolf at concentric.net:
>>>>
>>>>> "Both contact surfaces must also be the same material or tin oxide
>>>>> will form on the surface of the gold plating and cause a major
>>>>> headache. This was a serious problem with 486 and earlier Pentium
>>>>> PCs with 30 and 72 pin SIMMs and it led to a number of lawsuits."
>>>> Almost every DEC System Unit ("backplane") that I've ever seen uses
>>>> tinned-contacts, yet the Modules all use gold-plated fingers.
>>> I'm not familiar with them used in DEC systems in that way, but the
>>> problems with mixing tin and gold plated connectors is well
>>> documented. Even the connector manufacturers warn against mixing
>>> different platings.
>> While "don't mix contact surfaces" is sufficient, it isn't necessary.
>> What matters is the "anodic index" of the metal, or rather, the
>> difference between those two values for the two metals in contact. If
>> that difference is large, you have a problem; if it's small enough, you
>> do not. "Small enough" depends on the environment; aboard an
>> oceangoing ship the number has to be smaller than in an office setting.
>> I remember looking into this topic for an investigation of what types
>> of contact platings are acceptable for lithium coin cell battery
>> holders in IT equipment.
>
> This applies to bolted contact for structural things. Gold connectors
> usually have light contact pressure to preserve the soft gold plating.
> Tin contacts usually have higher contact force to scrape the oxide off
> the tin surface. When they are mixed, the tin can wipe onto the gold
> and then allow oxides to form due to the lower contact force. Tin
> contacts are supposed to provide enough pressure to form gas-tight
> contact areas.
Another thing to keep in mind here is that electrical current is being
passed through the junction. Mixed metals greatly increases the potential
for electromigration.
> And, of course, when exposed to salty air, then everything goes downhill
> REAL fast, corrosion galore. In a salt environment, I'd use
> semi-hermetically sealed connectors, and still expect lots of problems.
> The Navy probably knows a LOT about these things.
Even in a reasonably good atmospheric environment weird issues can crop
up. I once evaluated an air handler controller which had worked perfectly
in product testing, but once field deployed, had a very high failure rate.
It was made up of two pc boards with a pair of .100" pin and socket board
to board interconnects. The two boards were physically held together with
4 nylon snap-in standoffs. The lower board contained terminal blocks,
modular connectors, and the power supply circuitry and the upper board
contained the microcontroller, network circuitry, etc.
The cause of the failures turned out to be fretting corrosion of the board
to board connectors caused by vibration. Another contributing factor was
that many installers were not installing all 4 mounting screws when
mounting the controller inside the unit (these were field retrofitted
controllers) but were instead only installing 2 screws in opposite
corners.
The fix was to replace all of the existing board to board interconnects,
both the header and socket with parts that had 30 microinches of hard gold
over nickel (the original parts had 15 microinches of gold) and to use a
contact lubricant during assembly. Repaired boards were also to be
installed using all 4 mounting screws. The vendor later redesigned the
controller so it was all on a single board (while still admitting no
fault, of course).
The classiccmp VM will go down tonight around 10pm-ish CST. There is nothing
wrong with the VM, but the NAS it's disks are on is having some issues.
We've live-migrated all VDI's off that NAS except classiccmp's. Due to the
size of those drives, they will migrate a lot faster if that VM is shut down
so that's the route we're taking. I would expect it to be back up in the wee
hours of the morning - at least that's what the guy doing the work tells me.
Just fyi..
J
what kind of wooden modem?
In a message dated 7/9/2016 9:04:37 P.M. US Mountain Standard Time,
cisin at xenosoft.com writes:
>> So, I guess that I can bring a few items for the consignment sales,
>> (which is also "information coming soon"), but NOT a station wagon full
>> of boxes of books, classic vintage computers (QX10, SMC70, early 5150,
>> 8201a, etc.), hundreds of hard-sector diskettes, 3", 3.25" disks and
>> alignment disks, another wooden modem, ARC serial analyzer, etc.
>> (priced to meet expenses and lunch both days)
>> Oh well. I would have needed to get help packing the car, etc. anyway.
On Sat, 9 Jul 2016, Evan Koblentz wrote:
> Sure you can bring a car full of stuff, as long as it's sold at
consignment.
> I do not know how much table space we will have for that. It is possible
that
> we'll ask you to bring in some at a time.
At VCF6, I only brought a few things:
http://www.vintage-computer.com/images/vcf6/vendor5.jpg
but now I have more than ten times that, that needs to go or get
DUMPSTERED.
plus all that is left of
http://www.xenosoft.com/FPUIB
and at least 100 more boxes worth.
But, my health is not good enough to even pack it all.
My assistant at the last VCF died two years ago.
I had been hoping to totally fill Prius station wagon, and sell enough
first day to do an entire additional load the second day.
But, I don't think that it is realiatic to imagine that I can manage to do
that.
Besides the need to channel it in small quantities through "consignment",
I know that I can't manage even that level of physical exertion.
So, I'll probably just fill a couple of boxes with IBM Technical
References, Windows Resource kits, etc. and end up with most of the rest
eventually going to paper recycling. (most of the FPUIB stuff has been
in that list for 2 years, so there's obviously not a big pent-up demand)
--
Grumpy Ol' Fred cisin at xenosoft.com
On 07/09/2016 09:28 PM, Jon Elson wrote:
> I have the bottom part of a DV-31ETA-A-A01 VaxStation
> 3100. It has the bottom of the case, the main CPU board
> and the power supply. I think additional memory and the
> graphics/SCSI adaptor were mezzanine boards, and are NOT
> present in this. It was quite dirty when I found it, and
> I have not tried to fire it up. Anybody have an interest
> in this?
>
> Jon
Evan,
I for one am very excited. I was wondering are there any vendors or consignment items at this time?
Ali
-------- Original message --------
From: Evan Koblentz <cctalk at snarc.net>
Date: 7/9/2016 7:30 PM (GMT-08:00)
To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts" <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Subject: VCF West has 30 exhibits
There are 30 exhibits for Vintage Computer Festival West XI next month:
http://vcfed.org/wp/festivals/vintage-computer-festival-west-xi/vcf-west-ex…
Exhibit registration is full. Contact me privately if you'd like to join
the waiting list.
My first word processor was from Wang called ?Word Processor? and then
IBM?s ?Displaywriter?. I tried ?Wordstar? originally called
?Wordmaster? but way too complicated. When desktop publishing came
along WYSIWYG printing was made possible - the writer?s true
handmaiden! In the microcomputer world, classic computing, it was
?Smartwriter? on the Coleco ADAM. Those were the days!
Happy computing.
Murray
So a friend tells me there's a maybe-abandoned HP 8510 Network Analyzer in the hallway of the engineering building of the univ. he works at.
I presume it's a unit like this, as he says it's over a metre tall:
http://www.ece.lsu.edu/emdl/facilities/network%20analyser.html
I figure its a little too far large and too far away from my needs to take it on, but out of curiousity does anyone know offhand what processor they used in these?
(I haven't looked in depth online).
Cursory guess is its mid-90s technology.
The second release of the HP 3000 Series III simulator is now available
>from the Computer History Simulation Project (SIMH) site:
https://github.com/simh/simh
This release adds a simulation of the HP 2607, 2613, 2617, and 2618 line
printers and supports the use of custom VFU tape images, as well as the
built-in HP-standard VFU tape. The full set of configurable options is
detailed in a new section of the HP 3000 Simulator User's Guide that is
provided in Microsoft Word format in the "doc" subdirectory of the code
base snapshot downloaded from the github site. A PDF version of the
updated manual is also available at:
http://alum.mit.edu/www/jdbryan/hp3000_doc.pdf
In addition, the preconfigured MPE-V/R disc image available from Bitsavers:
http://www.bitsavers.org/bits/HP/HP_3000/
...has been updated to add the following features:
- The MPE cold load command files attach the line printer to the "lp.txt"
output file and specify the "-n" option to clear the file before use.
- Preinstalled User-Defined Commands (UDCs) provide access to the COBOL
74 compiler with the MPE-V/E :COBOLII, :COBOLIIPREP, and :COBOLIIGO
commands, and to the COBOL 85 compiler with :COBOLIIX,
:COBOLIIXPREP, and :COBOLIIXGO. However, note that the simulator
currently does not provide the HP 32234A COBOL II firmware
instructions, so programs generated by the COBOLII compiler will
abort at run time with "ILLEGAL INSTRUCTION" errors, limiting the
current utility of the compilers to syntax checking.
Thanks once again go to Frank McConnell for providing the HP line printer
subsystems manuals that facilitated development of the new simulation, and
to Robert Mills for providing the COBOLII UDCs.
-- Dave
I found some BAMDUA / BAKUP newsletters (Bay Area Micro Decision Users
Association and Bay Area Kaypro Users and Programmers). Does anyone know
anything about these user groups?
--
David Griffith
dave at 661.org
A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
My classic/vintage computer activity has taken a back seat lately but I did
find a machine I had on the "classic" list for some time. It's now part of
the collection.
http://www.classic-computers.org.nz/collection/imac.htm
Some would say this is not vintage, classic or collectible (and so
shouldn't be discussed here). However, these are all subjected terms which
can be (and are!) argued about at length.
To me it's a noteworthy model which had some impact on personal computing
(notably by helping put Apple back in the game). Vintage? At only 18
years old perhaps not but a classic and collectible? As time goes by I
would say yes.
Terry (Tez)
-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: Re: Front Panels - New development - Bezels
Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2016 08:01:35 +0100
From: Rod Smallwood <rodsmallwood52 at btinternet.com>
To: Paul Birkel <pbirkel at gmail.com>
On 07/07/2016 07:18, Paul Birkel wrote:
> "MakeAnEight", oh my :->. Next it will be "SweetSixteen" I imagine.
>
> Great news on the casting-in-resin prototype. How much are these ending up costing?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cctalk [mailto:cctalk-bounces at classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Rod Smallwood
> Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2016 2:04 AM
> To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
> Subject: Front Panels - New development - Bezels
>
> Hi Guys
>
> We are able to-announce the successful test production of a PDP-8 Bezel in cast resin.
>
> The result is tough, beige colored, slightly flexible copy of the original.
>
> Bonding the panel to the bezel or adding internal stiffening brings rigidity.
>
> Painting matches the color.
>
> This will be part of our MakeAnEight parts for reproduction or repair range.
>
>
> Rod (Panelman) Smallwood
>
>
>
Hi Paul
Well I was going to call it ElevenHeaven but I like
your idea better.
They got a good result first time. That seemed too easy. Then I remembered
that when I went through the molding and casting process they said is
that it?
It just dawned on me. Screen printing is all about handling gloopy liquids.
They have all of the knowledge of mixing and all of the measuring pots and
stirring sticks you will ever need.
Cost? Well that's interesting.
Usually in a small run/custom situation its the labor cost that's the
major element.
Here it seems to be the cost of the materials to get the right result. I
should know soon.
Regards Rod
July is BASIC Month and there's another challenge happening on RetroBattlestations. The type-in program for this challenge borrows a little bit of code from the very first BASIC challenge that I did. I've created a little "turtle graphics" type program that uses a stack based command interpreter. Right now the commands are very simple, pen up & down, move forward and turn. There's also looping to make it easy to create that spirograph effect that everyone loves to do!
This time around there's more than just the random winners for typing in the program as-is. I'll also be choosing two people who can add the most interesting features or port it to the most exotic hardware. So far there are not too many platforms that have been ported to, and the only features that anyone has added has just been random colorization.
You can check it out here:
https://redd.it/4qs0f3
--
Follow me on twitter: @FozzTexx
Check out my blog: http://insentricity.com
Hi Guys
+++++++++++++++++++++++ Panels stocked and ready to ship
+++++++++++++++++++
I am pleased to be able to announce the following PDP-8 front panels are
now ex-stock.
Stock levels are 10 or less of:
PDP-8/e (Type A)
PDP-8/e (Type B)
PDP-8/f
PDP-8/m
Please order now as each type takes ten days to make and the
manufacturing slot for each comes round once in six weeks.
Rod (Panelman) Smallwood
> From: Mouse
> "The most amazing achievement of the computer software industry is its
> continuing cancellation of the steady and staggering gains made by the
> computer hardware industry." - credited to Henry Petroski
There's a reason I run considerably older software (which I prefer because
it's less bloated) on somewhat older hardware (which is cheap, used) - i.e.
hardware that's considerably newer than the software running on it - and your
quotation nails it.
The response time I get with Epsilon V8.0 (circa 1996) on an Athlon XP is
scintillating - my finger has barely started to come up on the key before the
screen reflects the command (e.g. to switch buffers). The response time is
blindingly fast.
Now, admittedly, Epsilon was fast to start with (i.e. on contemporanous
hardware), so perhaps it's not the best example. But the same is true for
other things, albeit to a lesser degree; e.g. switching windows to different
applications.
Older software on newer hardware provides a sparkling user experience, in
terms of responsiveness.
Noel
Many people used program editors to write articles and books in the
early days! Myself included... Ed#
In a message dated 7/6/2016 1:43:21 P.M. US Mountain Standard Time,
jnc at mercury.lcs.mit.edu writes:
> From: Fred Cisin
> the first person to use a word processor was probably typing business
> letters and/or legal documents, which is what they were developed for.
Depends what you mean by "word processor". If you mean 'software intended
to
format text', you need to look back to things like TJ2:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TJ-2
and 'runoff', both circa 1963. Much earlier than any of the 'word
processors'
this person wrote about.
Noel
Hi Guys,
I have a nice big batch of PDP-8/i panels in production. I
really need a real original panel to check against.
Can anybody lend me one?
Rod (Panelman) Smallwood
Hi Guys
We are able to-announce the successful test production of
a PDP-8 Bezel in cast resin.
The result is tough, beige colored, slightly flexible copy
of the original.
Bonding the panel to the bezel or adding internal
stiffening brings rigidity.
Painting matches the color.
This will be part of our MakeAnEight parts for reproduction
or repair range.
Rod (Panelman) Smallwood
I'm currently in the process of repairing a Supermicro P6DLF motherboard
which suffered shipping damage and I'm trying to find anyone else who
might have one. I can't find any photos of one of these boards online
(except for the one I recently purchased) and the board I have shows
possible signs of prior rework that I'm trying figure out.
The electrolytic capacitors on this particular board at locations CE1 and
CE6 have Sanyo OS-CON 220uF 10V polymer parts (purple sleeve and appear to
be 10SA220M) fitted and the solder work was done by hand. The joints were
completely defluxed/cleaned, but the leads were hand sheared down into the
solder joint. All of the other electrolytic capacitors on this board are
Sanyo CG series 1000uF 16V (green) that were wave soldered.
I suspect two of the Sanyo CG series parts were replaced at some point by
a prior owner with the SA series polymer parts. According to the SA series
datasheet, the largest 10mm diameter part is 220uF 10V, which may be why
those were installed. I haven't used one of these boards since the late
'90s when I built a workstation with one, and I can't remember with 100%
certainty that Supermicro didn't use a few polymer parts on these boards.
If anyone else has one of these boards and can physically check it to see
what parts are installed, it would be really helpful. Many of the original
Sanyo CG series parts were trashed on my board when it was shipped in one
of those thin USPS Priority boxes, so I'm going to end up replacing all of
them. If the two OS-CON parts turn out to be not original, I'll fit the
correct value parts in those two locations while I'm at it.
> From: Fred Cisin
> the first person to use a word processor was probably typing business
> letters and/or legal documents, which is what they were developed for.
Depends what you mean by "word processor". If you mean 'software intended to
format text', you need to look back to things like TJ2:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TJ-2
and 'runoff', both circa 1963. Much earlier than any of the 'word processors'
this person wrote about.
Noel
just have to know what to ask google for
https://www.grainger.com/category/ecatalog/N-1z0dxrh
In a message dated 7/4/2016 3:58:05 P.M. US Mountain Standard Time,
jnc at mercury.lcs.mit.edu writes:
So there was some discussion a while back about using lifts to put heavy
gear
in racks. I'm going to be doing some of that soon, and I was wondering how
I'd
go about acquiring something like that at a non-exorbitant price? (eBait
was
not useful, and Googling "user server lift" didn't produce anything
either.)
Any ideas?
Noel
There was some recent discussion of the need for M7237 (KJ11-A Stack Limit
Register) boards, and I said I had one, and could scan it (for the PCB traces
- they aren't in the FMPS) if someone wanted to duplicate it; I had a request
for same, so scans are now online, here:
http://ana-3.lcs.mit.edu/~jnc/tech/pdp11/PDP-11_Stuff.html
It will be a little bit of work to produce PCB artwork, since some of the
traces dive under chips (and I'm not about to lift the chips :-), but from
the prints (in the 11/40 print set, page 112) it should be easy to work them
out.
Noel
So there was some discussion a while back about using lifts to put heavy gear
in racks. I'm going to be doing some of that soon, and I was wondering how I'd
go about acquiring something like that at a non-exorbitant price? (eBait was
not useful, and Googling "user server lift" didn't produce anything either.)
Any ideas?
Noel
> Googling "user server lift" didn't produce anything
Oops, typo: "user" -> "used". (The prices I was seeing for these things was
high, so I was wondering if used ones might be a bargain.)
I also should have mentioned that I'm looking to put heavy assemblies (disk
drives) up high in a 6' rack - say at the 5' level, counting the raised floor
section the racks are one -q so the engine hoists aren't an option. (By an odd
coincidence, I happen to have one of those Harbour Freight units in my garage,
and it's a great engine hoist; not high enough for this, though.) And I was
hoping for something in the $200 or so range, and even the cheaper manual
units are more than that, new.
Noel
harbor freight has some excellent platform lift things...
worth checking....
we like things like this as large TV studio cameras weigh 100 to 200
<<and one here is 300 (tk42)>>
when we get a caucus in and want to clean it up and make it presentable
for display we like to work on it at bench height...
(once in a while it is good to raise a tape drive up in the air
too...)
<< I can't believe I used to grab a 7970E out of a rack... walk it across
the computer room and put in another rack by my self......no more.... I
just look at it in the rack and get tired now!!>>>
ED#
In a message dated 7/4/2016 4:12:07 P.M. US Mountain Standard Time,
elson at pico-systems.com writes:
On 07/04/2016 05:57 PM, Noel Chiappa wrote:
> So there was some discussion a while back about using lifts to put heavy
gear
> in racks. I'm going to be doing some of that soon, and I was wondering
how I'd
> go about acquiring something like that at a non-exorbitant price? (eBait
was
> not useful, and Googling "user server lift" didn't produce anything
either.)
>
I've used an "engine hoist" around the shop to move heavy
stuff. It has an extendable beam and a bottle jack to raise
it. It folds up into a pretty small package when not in
use. These can often be had pretty cheaply.
Jon
there ya go!
In a message dated 7/4/2016 4:00:56 P.M. US Mountain Standard Time,
rich.cini at verizon.net writes:
I just googled "scissor lift table" and came up with something that I
might search for if I had a similar need. Look at the images and see if those
would work for you.
Rich
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jul 4, 2016, at 6:57 PM, Noel Chiappa <jnc at mercury.lcs.mit.edu> wrote:
>
> So there was some discussion a while back about using lifts to put heavy
gear
> in racks. I'm going to be doing some of that soon, and I was wondering
how I'd
> go about acquiring something like that at a non-exorbitant price? (eBait
was
> not useful, and Googling "user server lift" didn't produce anything
either.)
> Any ideas?
>
> Noel
I'm trying to preserve my Acorn ADFS 3.5" discs. To this end, I've purchased a KryoFlux "Pro" board and a new-old-stock ALPS floppy drive.
I've hooked it all up to a Windows 8.1 VM and everything *seems* to be working. However, the .adl images I create are all 0KB in size.
I've created a profile to match the discs I'm reading (256byte sector size, tracks 0-79, MFM encoding, interleaved sides).
Recording the flux transitions captures data, but when I run the resultant data back through DTC I get the same.
Any ideas?
-Austin.
Sent from my iPad
Hi folks - if any of the folks I used to know are still on this list (Tony
Duell? Pete Turnbull? Jim Doran? Jules Richardson?), I just wanted to let
you know I'll be visiting TNMoC for the first time on 11th Aug. I
mentioned this on the Edinburgh Computer History Project list and a few of
the old Edinburgh hands will be coming along to make a day trip of it. If
anyone is going to be in the neighbourhood and wants to say hello while
we're there, let me know (or subscribe to our Yahoo group for updates)
We had an Edinburgh connection with BP through Donald Michie, and I believe
a bunch of our old computer center hardware (2976?) ended up in a shed at
TNMoC.
Best regards,
Graham
(PS I was never gone, I just don't post much.)
Bill, I hope that you can snap a few pictures with your phone to show us.
This is quite the mystery device.
On Sat, Jul 2, 2016 at 8:56 PM, Bill Sudbrink <wh.sudbrink at verizon.net>
wrote:
> No, I don't think so. I'm pretty sure that the paper
> tape on this thing is for output, probably printed or
> marked in some way because the paper seemed too flimsy
> to hold a readable punch pattern. But now I'm pretty
> determined to go back tomorrow and see if I can get
> some more info. I didn't look at the bottom of it, maybe
> there's a label.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: cctalk [mailto:cctalk-bounces at classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Chuck
> > Guzis
> > Sent: Saturday, July 02, 2016 11:30 PM
> > To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
> > Subject: Re: Maybe interesting toy in junk shop...
> >
> > On 07/02/2016 07:32 PM, Bill Sudbrink wrote:
> > > I was poking around a junk shop that I visit from time to time and I
> > > saw a toy. It didn't really strike me as that interesting when I saw
> > > it but I've been wondering about it since I left the place this
> > > morning. The thing was mostly red plastic with a cardboard bottom.
> > > It had a two-prong AC cord and a four prong "old fashioned" telephone
> > > jack. It had two big buttons and a spool of paper tape mounted on
> > > the front. The tape was about 1/4 inch wide. I call it a toy
> > > because it had that sort of feel about it. It was not clearly
> > > labeled as such. It was also styled in a way that suggested late
> > > 1960s to me. The whole thing was the size of a small shoe box. I
> > > can't find anything like it in google searches. I wonder if it might
> > > have some early modem like device in it. Does this description "ring
> > > a bell" with anyone?
> >
> >
> > Sounds like a late-model Kilburg Dialaphone. 1960-ish. Early models
> > directly operated the dial of the desk telephone--later ones just
> > pulsed
> > the line appropriately--something that AT&T objected to and that
> > Kilburg
> > unsuccessfully fought. This was years before the Carterfone episode.
> > Memory was a paper tape with printed names on it.
> >
> > That particular unit sounds like a very rare piece of kit.
> >
> > Am I getting close?
> >
> > --Chuck
> >
> > -----
> > No virus found in this message.
> > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> > Version: 2016.0.7640 / Virus Database: 4604/12477 - Release Date:
> > 06/23/16
> > Internal Virus Database is out of date.
>
>
--
Thanks,
-AJ
http://MicrotechM1.blogspot.com
So, after finding that a DL11-E wasn't working in the backplane SPC
slots (26-28) on my 11/45, I took a closer look. The problem isn't
exactly what I had expected -- -15V seems to be distributed there, but
+15 is not.
Looking closely at the print sets, the listed configurations only
mention DL11-A, the 20ma current loop model, which wouldn't require +15
to work. I wonder if some +15 distribution wires were added in an ECO,
or maybe EIA console from the backplane SPC slots was never supported
for these early 11/45s (mine is serial 152).
There's one other oddity -- the power distribution table in
EK-11045-MM-007, page 510, implies that +15 should be distributed to the
SPC slots on CA1. I'm wondering if this is a typo, since I'd expect
that pin to be NPG? The DL11-E looks to be expecting +15 on UA1 in any
case.