--- "Russ Blakeman" wrote:
I've seen NuBus centronics adapters on ebay that allow you to have a
standard 25 pin centronics compatible parallel port - you might look around
for one. I'm not sure if your machine has NuBus or PCI but I'm guessing that
it's NuBus.
------
PCI actually. The question then becomes, how does the driver deal with it -- I mean, the LaserWriter 8 driver for this printer looks at the printer port, so how would it "know" to look at an adapter card...hmmm.
------
Why is she worried about upgrading if the OS doens't suit her
needs?
--- end of quote ---
She's in no rush, but clearly the software developers will eventually no longer support the old OS and then she will have to upgrade. So it's good to find out what will happen when the time comes. She is a graphic designer and webmaster so it matters that she be able to run new versions of Photoshop, Illustrator, GoLive, etc. and at some point OS 9 will be obsolete.
Thanks,
-- MB
On Apr 1, 22:56, Chad Fernandez wrote:
> Pete,
>
> Pete Turnbull wrote:
> > Are the arrows like a left and right angle bracket (more properly
called
> > chevrons or a "greater than" and "less than") with three dots between?
>
> Nope, more like an arrow pointing left, and an arrow pointing right.
> With a "0-3" below one, and a "4-7" below the other set.
Then it ain't what I was thinking of. Fortunately someone else posted more
useful info last night :-)
> >What was this machine used for?
>
> Computin stuff I guess :-) I have no idea, really :-)
Much like most of mine, then. Though a few are used as door furniture :-)
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
On Apr 1, 19:31, Geoff Reed wrote:
> http://www.blackbox.nl/techweb/connect/db15hd.htm
> it's a DB15HD, if you go to google and search, a heckuva lot of hits
come
> up for it. looking in a "Pocket PC-Ref" book I have also referrs to it as
> DB15HD. the D shell looks to be the same size as a DB-9
As Tony pointed out, it can't properly be a "DB" anything, since a standard
9-pin shell is DE. Just because some people commonly refer to it as DB
doesn't mean it's correct, after all lots of people call the standard 9-pin
shell a DB. Amp, for example, refer to their entire standard series as
"DB" but that's not what most other manufacturers do.
McMurdo refer to the type used for VGA as HDE15 (and the next sizes up as
HDA26 and HDB44) which seems much more likely to be correct.
And I wouldn't particularly believe BlackBox, they're just one reseller.
> At 06:43 PM 3/31/01 +0100, you wrote:
> > >
> > > I've seen the VGA plug referred to as DB15HD
> >
> >I could believe DE15HD, or HDE15. But not DB-anything -- it's not a size
> >B shell after all (which is how this thread got started...)
> >
> >-tony
>
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
I just posted a bunch of pictures of some prototype Atari stuff I found
today at a local electronics flea market.
Thanks to Curt Vendel's Atari Historical Society website
(http://www.atari-history.com) I've learned that they are prototype boards
for AtariTel, which was supposed to be a breakthrough new business phone
system but Atari never released it.
I have what look to be the initial raw prototypes and then etched
prototype development boards, and then an almost complete phone (missing
the handset and top cover). There's also a hacked handset used during
development and a rough prototype of the case made from plexiglass. From
the scanned preliminary product description document found on AHS, I
learned that the project inception was in 1981. The boards I got have
either 1983 or 1984 copyright dates on them.
There was also an unlabeled hacked carthridge in the pile (not pictured).
I don't know if the ROM is still good on it though. It's been in a pretty
rough climate. If it does work I imagine it has some interesting code on
it perhaps.
The whole pile of cards looked as though they had been sitting in a box
outside under a tree or something. The solder traces were starting to
corrode and chip leads starting to rust. I cleaned off a lot of bug and
leaf debris and lots of dirt. It's a shame they had to be stored like
this, but I guess the guy who designed this stuff didn't think it was
significant.
Also in the pile were some odd items. There was a board labelled "Misty
001". Is this related to something else? There was also a home-made
acoustic coupler box. I don't know what it's purpose is, but it had an
Atari serial connector on the back. Both of these are pictured.
The photos are at:
http://www.siconic.com/crap/AtariTel
Sorry I didn't label the pictures properly. You'll just have to go
through and check them all out if you're at all interested in this. It
was really cool discovering this stuff. In their heyday, Atari hand their
hands in everything it seems.
Sellam Ismail Vintage Computer Festival
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
International Man of Intrigue and Danger http://www.vintage.org
4/1/01 7:33:53 PM, Chad Fernandez <fernande(a)internet1.net> wrote:
>
>The 2 RF35 (I think that's the number) don't have the cables hooked up
>for the panel. I assumed they didn't use the panel. Am I wrong on
>this? They look like later, more modern drives to me, so I thought they
>wouldn't use the panel, and I didn't see any place to hook them up. The
>drive mounted lights do come on.
They should use the panel. There is a 10 pin header that is nestled between
the power plug and the 50 pin DSSI plug, that is where a 10 pin cable
goes from the drive to the back side of the disk bulkhead. That also
sets the unit numbers for the drive. Perhaps someone set them up to
override the unit numbers because they were short of plugs or something.
When you type 'sho dev' they show up as DIAxx what numbers do the
drives show up as?
>Mine seems to have a standard 4 connector cable. If I made a cable, how
>many memory boards could I use?
As many as you can fit, however the CPU is limited to addressing 64MB of
RAM so you can't get more than that. Also the 4MB disables itself if you
install a full 64MB (4 x 16MB is common)
>> The 4Plex should work fine on it, *if* you have a SCSI interface in there.
>
>Good. What should I look for in a SCSI card?
Existence. :-) Actually SCSI cards for this beast aren't hard to find, they are
just hard to afford for many collectors. You want a SCSI card with an 'sbox'
handle. Examples are the Emulex UC-08, CMD CQD-223, etc. I prefer the
CMD ones but Emulex, Dilog, and others made them.
You can buy them all day for $500 each from DEC resellers. On Ebay they
go for less than $300 usually, and of course if you buy a couple of tons of
VAXen before they get scrapped you can often salvage one or two. I sold
one as part of a cherry 4000/200 and now I kinda wish I hadn't (I just got
a VAX 4000/700A that I _really_ would like to put a SCSI drive on.)
If you get one with non-Sbox handles you will either have to adapt a
blank Sbox "bar" to mount the connector or you will have to run the
cable out from between the bars. I've done both.
Alternate mechanisms to getting a SCSI CD-ROM are to get an RRD40
controller (slow but it works!) You may be able to find a DEC reseller who
will sell you the drive and controller for less than $100.
> When I do get a SCSI
>card, should I remove the TK70, or just mount the cd-rom in an external
>case? I would like the cd-rom internal, but I don't know how important
>that TK70 might be.
No doubt the TK70 will be critical if you find a piece of software that only
comes on the original TK50 media. I prefer my VAXen to sport a TKxx
drive. Something I've been doing lately is making 'vax boxes' which are
2 unit SCSI cases with a VAX compatible CD-ROM drive and a removable
SCSI drive. Then I get a couple of trays for the SCSI drives (these are pretty
cheap these days) and put VMS on a 200 - 500Mb SCSI disk and NetBSD
on a 1GB disk (not that NetBSD is that much less efficient, just that I
like room to build kernels and such.) Then one can swap out disks to run
different OS'es.
Mounting the CDROM in the case will be problematic and frankly doesn't
get you all that much.
--Chuck
On Apr 1, 14:53, Chad Fernandez wrote:
> That card I thought was SCSI is a serial
> card, I think. It has the same little double arrows on it as the
> console port, even if the connectors are centronics 50.
Are the arrows like a left and right angle bracket (more properly called
chevrons or a "greater than" and "less than") with three dots between?
That's the standard symbol for a network interface, and a 50-way
Centronics-style connector is what used to be used to connect a
"harmonica". A harmonica is a distribution block with a 50-way input and
(usually) 12 10baseT ports. If I were you, I'd take that card out and have
a look at it, it might be interesting. What was this machine used for?
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
Evening folks, I am looking for a circuit using the parallel port on a
pc to Ide interface, does anyone have a schematic for one?
I also have 20 (2.5 in) toshiba 4.8 gig drives (new and in sealed
antistatic). these are 2 mm interface ata4 44pin that I will offer to
sell to the group before listing them at ebay. ($75 ea + shipping)
I also have AMD K6-2 233 AFR Socket 7 processors (new) these also will
be offered to the group for ($20 ea), before I place them on ebay as
well.
I am going to put them up in two weeks, so if any one is interested
please email me at
elecdata(a)kcinter.net
Thanks
Bill Claussen
Elecdata1 (ebay)
I seem to have a couple disk II interface and 1 parallel cards for appleII
machines, if anyone has need of these critters they are available for $5
(to cover shipping and getting them to the shipping location, i'm currently
outta work, but if these are useful to you, they're yours.)
Is anyone in the Seattle area or close by interested in taking a bunch of old Mac
Classics and SE's off of my hands (approx 30)?? All are in working condition.
Please contact me for more information.
Hi,
I'm a long time lurker, first time poster. I recently obtained a mobo that
was sitting around a local computer store, and am having a little trouble
with it. It's a 386SX motherboard, with onboard parallel, serial, and PS/2
connectors. I was planning on building a little box based on this, but the
problem is the lack of ISA or PCI (obviously) slots. Instead, what i have is
a bigass connector. It's about 2 1/2 times bigger than a PCI slot. I'm
thinking this may be an extension to plug in another card with slots, but I
have no idea. Can anyone help me? If you need more info let me know, i can
supply it. The brands Faraday and WDC are displayed prominently on a lot of
the ICs.
-Lanny
Hi Folks,
TI-59/58 Diagrams !!!!
(I've also posted this message on the oddcalc list)
I've come accross an old schoolproject that "M.B. van der Mark" once
wrote. It details a lot about the TI59 hardware. The material is very old
though and cannot be scanned with good quality, it is also written
in dutch.
So I took it upon myself to revamp and translate this material. For
starters I made a new drawing of the TI59/58 schematic.
In the coming weeks (or month) I will add the diagrams for the
powersupply, the PC100 Printer .... and the abbreviated translation
of the rest of the material that details some of basics of operation
of this marvelous programmable calculator.
I will put this material on my website at
http://xgistor.ath.cx
Drill down to: Go Files >> Various Downloadble Files >> TI59
You can mail any comments via this list of if you prefer
to contact me directly: click on the e-mail link of my
main page.
Sipke de Wal
-----------------------------------------------
"Vini Vidi Foooooooooooooooooooooootshy"
-----------------------------------------------
ps: I any of you out there have a site that covers
TI59/58 stuff. Feel free to make a link to my page
It is a dynamic DNS though, so it can be down
occasionally for a few minutes .
From: M.Buckett <M.Buckett(a)dcs.hull.ac.uk>
>> But how many times per hour did you have to reboot it?
>
>About once every 2 weeks, but by that time the upload speed had dropped
>considerably. You could tell how long it would be before the next reboot
>by the amount of HD activity. Just before failing the HD would be going
>non-stop, I suspect a few memory leaks.... There was talk of buying
You suspect right. Most cases where WIN9x has to reboot to keep
perfomance always seem to track back to a driver or app that never
"leaks" memory. More ram or more cpu cannot help that much.
Allison
>a timer plug to cut the power once a day for 15 minutes so it never
>got too bad. Mind you you had to do all the configuration before you
>started capturing images as the computer would start to fail to respond
>to keyboard events once the webcam software had started.
>
>Matthew Buckett
Hi,
Does anyone know where I can find a Prolinea 4100 setup disk? Dozens of
those computers around but everybody seems to have thrown away the setup
disks.
Thanks in advance
Wim
We are trying to get an APC operational, and would like to ask if
anyone has a couple of the optional memory expansion boards that they would
part with for a reasonable price?
Also, does anyone know where I could track down a tape punch and
reader for a Model 33 Teletype?
Thanks
Charlie Fox
Chas E. Fox Video Productions
793 Argyle Rd. Windsor ON N8Y 3J8
foxvideo(a)wincom.net
Check out:
Camcorder Kindergarten at http://chasfoxvideo.com
> I would really like to learn how to use these devices, so any tips on
> getting started, words of wisdom RE different roms etc.?
A good place to start.
FP4's will probably have PROM 4.1, or perhaps 4.1.2. You can manage
them from a DIRECTLY connected LocalTalk or EtherTalk (Phase I)
connected Mac running FastPath Manager (FPM). [This is also true for
FP2's or FP3's which were upgraded to 2U's or 3U's] FPM uses "KLAP" --
a packet with "LAP" type 0x4b (the letter 'K'), which cannot be
routed.
An FP4 could be upgraded in two ways; Just a new PROM (5.1), or a new
PROM, and a 256K SRAM memory board (for a total of 512K), which came
with a new case, and a fan. A box with PROM v5.1 can be managed with
FPM, or via Shiva Net Manager (SNM). SNM only speaks KLAP over DDP
(or was that ATP). DDP is the regular AppleTalk network layer, so you
can speak to boxes via intervening AppleTalk routers. ATP is the
transaction protocol, layered on DDP. The CPU clock on the FP4 68000,
was, I believe 8MHz.
FP5's started with PROM v5.0 [FP5's use their PROM only to load the
"VROM" -- a protected memory version of the PROM code]. FP5's came
with 512K standard, and could be built with (or, I suppose upgraded
to) up to 1MB, and the CPU clock was, I believe 10MHz.
The FP4 is perhaps, more flexible in the hands of a hacker, since you
could take direct control of the SCC, and do async or perhaps sync
serial. On the FP5, the SCC is part of the I/O Processor (a Zilog
Z181), and I never did an API to load code into the IOP. All versions
of the FastPath PROM provide a vector of routines which the download
can call. In PROM v4 and up, this includes access to the Ethernet
driver, which is how we got away with replacing the iNTEL Ethernet
controller from the FP1/2/3/4 with the Fujitsu EtherStar -- the
download (K-STAR) doesn't care what the hardware is (direct SCC and
i82586 on the FP4, or IOP and EtherStar in the FP5).
On powerup, the PROM spends 20(?) seconds flashing LEDs, then starts
the download, or the built in PROM GW (removed in v5), which is a
simple Phase1/LocalTalk router (with no IP capabilities). Its's best
to pause or reset the box before it gets rolling, in case it's
misconfigured or otherwise frotzed. Once you have it paused, you can
set the configuration and download K-STAR (NOTE!! With FPM and K-STAR
8+, the Phase II zone list is sent appended to the download, so it
only gets set when downloading code!! -- SNM can set the zone list any
time -- although the details of how we did that escape me at the
moment).
AppleTalk routing; If you set VERY LITTLE configuration, K-STAR will
autoconfigure, either learning information, or supplying it. If you
set some things, but not others, autoconfiguration may be disabled.
IP; Most people will probably want to use the box to IP-enable
LocalTalk Mac's. The simplest way is to use K-STAR IP, and supply
"dynamic" addresses. The Mac IP addresses will directly follow the
FastPaths, so assign a big enough block. MacTCP has an option
"dynamic", which you DO NOT want to use (it means randomly pick an
address to use!!) -- you want to use a "server" assigned address.
I can't (off the top of my head) think of any other pitfalls.
-phil
On Mar 27, 22:02, Mike Ford wrote:
> >I'm old, dirts older. When I was in school you were really cool of your
> >radio
> >had six transistors, cooler if it had FM and rich if your portable tape
>
> Are you sure you weren't trying to impress people with the catwhisker on
> your crystal set? ;)
Don't be silly. My crystal set had a germanium diode, and I bet Allison's
did too :-)
I do remember my father buying a Philips Compact Cassette recorder when
they were new and even cooler than my 7-transistor radio finished in red
artificial leatherette. A cassette recorder of the same model still
happily reads and writes tapes on some of my older home micros, despite
being old when they were new (if you see what I mean).
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
I have three of the "old style" touch tone phones available (real bell, can be used with an acoustic modem),
If anyone wants them please let me know, we can work something out.
--Chuck
From: Lanny Cox <chronic(a)nf.sympatico.ca>
>It's about 2 1/2 times bigger than a PCI slot, as i originally
mentioned. It
>looks a lot like an ISA port (ISA style connectors and black casing),
but is
>a lot bigger. There's only one connector on the mobo, which does support
the
>riser card theory. Luckily, the system has onboard video, serial and
>parallel ports, etc. so it won't be so bad.
Thats the case. Most pizza boxen that are under 5" high have to mount the
card
horizontally so the do the 120 pin connector and riser with the cards
plugging into
the riser sideways.
I have a AT&T P100, Dell 486DX and Dell 386sx/16 all using risers like
that.
Allison
From: Jim Strickland <jim(a)calico.litterbox.com>
Any springy material. I used P-bronze, pen springs straightend
and even common copper wire. Springy materials work better
as you could rely on them maintaining pressure.
Allison
Our local Wacky Willy surplus store has got a box of new SCSI II terminators
that are labeled "Differential-C". They have the 50 pin mini "D" male
connector.
Wacky is asking $2.50 each. If anyone is interested in some of these I would
be happy to help them out for $5 shipping. I bet I could get 6 or 8 in a mail
box. Please reply to me off list. Overseas shipping slightly higher.
I don't know if these are rare or not. They are new in sealed bags.
Paxton
Portland, Oregon
USA
Does anybody have some spare SMD disk cables they can part with? I could
make some, but I would have to buy the pieces and, frankly, I don't need a
hundred feet of 60-conductor ribbon cable.
Drop me a line off-list and I'm sure we can arrange a suitable deal.
Thanks!
ok
r.
ps. that's "Silly Retro-Computing Geek"
Well, I got my Solbourne (hi Mike!) this weekend. It's a S3000DX with 40MB RAM
and runs OS/MP 4.1a. Two drives, nice box, excellent condition.
The problem is that this box was production and I have no CDs to boot from, so
I can't get into it in service mode so I can wipe it out. For lack of nothing
better to do, I was able to "cp sd.si(,,)etc/password bw()" from the boot
monitor and get the encrypted root password so that the 4-processor HP PA-RISC
2.0 L-class in the server room can have something to do other than run the
school :-), but since there's > 6.6e+15 possibilities in that I was wondering
if there's a faster way. It can understand UFS from the boot monitor, which
is nice, and it does have a floppy drive, but I don't know what file system
it expects to be on it (otherwise I'd copy etc/password off, blast the root
crypt, and put a new one on -- or does this not work so good?).
Any suggestions? How about hacking a Sun box with no password -- since this
is a perverted SunOS machine in concept? :-)
--
----------------------------- personal page: http://www.armory.com/~spectre/ --
Cameron Kaiser, Point Loma Nazarene University * ckaiser(a)stockholm.ptloma.edu
-- I couldn't care less about apathy. -----------------------------------------
Available immediately:
Approximately 30 Mostek MK4801AN-1 (aka "4118A") 1K*8 SRAM chips with
1982 date stamps. You pay USPS priority mail shipping ($3.95) -
first to reply to me at "shoppa(a)trailing-edge.com" gets them.
Also available: about 100 Motorola MC4024 VCO chips. Same deal.
Tim. (shoppa(a)trailing-edge.com)
>I was not into games when these were popular so...anybody remember any good
>titles that could be played head-to-head on these?
You want to get a copy of mazewar. Endless amusement, runs over localtalk.
--Chuck
Okay, I whipped up a quick site for my HP 9845 stuff. It has scanned
screen shots from some of my games. If you're curious, check it out.
http://www.sixstring.com/terry/hp9845/
I'm still hoping to find a working HP that can play these!
Terry
Is it true that there was never a release of PC/MS-DOS 1.0, and that the
first production release was 1.10?
Sellam Ismail Vintage Computer Festival
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
International Man of Intrigue and Danger http://www.vintage.org
a few A1200 Amiga questions (do they hit the 10 year limit? I know I got my
A500 in the early 90's, and I think A3000's were around then, right??)...
Anyway, here goes:
Do all 1200's come with built in IDE hard drive controllers - or did
commodore do things on the cheap and only add controllers for machines
shipped with drives (I'm assuming the controller lives on the main board
itself)?
Will the 1200 accept any size (capacity) drive? Or wasn't the OS / ROM code
hard-drive aware and cheated by making the drive look like a big floppy (I'm
sure there were systems which did this, but I can't remember if the amiga
was one of them)?
Presumably 2.5 drives are the preferred method - but there's nothing to stop
3.5" IDE drives being used with a suitable adpator (OK that's actually an
IDe question - I think it's just the connectors that differ between them
though, right?)
On the hardware side of things, someone said the 1200's IDE controller is
basically unbuffered I/O straight to the CPU (which sounds possible
certainly with IDE) and so it's real easy to toast things - is that true?
What are the options of networking a '1200 (ideally TCP/IP stack on the
Amiga, using SLIP or something to a Unix box maybe? Are there things around
that allow this, with NFS mounting of drives for data copying?)
Can PC SVGA multisync monitors be used with the 1200, or won't the monitor
sync to a low enough frequency for the Amiga (seem to remember that was the
problem with the 500, not sure if the 1200 has any sort of 'fix' for this on
the Amiga side though)
Having seen how cheap 1200's are these days, and having a pile of spare IDE
drives lying around (both 3.5 and 2.5) I'm quite keen to get a 1200 to put
Deluxe Paint on - it's still far better than any art package I've seen on
modern systems despite being ancient by modern software standards! I can't
be bothered using my old A500 for this though - too slow and too painful
without a hard disk...
directions to an Amiga FAQ that may answer some or all of the above would be
most useful too! :-)
cheers!
Jules
On Mar 30, 8:39, Richard Erlacher wrote:
> Well, if the purpose of the crystal + (what we used was a safety-pin) is
to
> function as a diode, then is it still a crystal radio if a diode is used
> instead?
Sure. Early germanium diodes are point-contact devices made using a small
crystal of germanium.
I've not tried it, but I imagine a modern Schottky diode would be a good
replacement. Some of them have an even lower voltage drop than normal
germanium diodes, so the set would be a little more sensitive.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
From: Tony Duell <ard(a)p850ug1.demon.co.uk>
>I read somewhere that a piece of coke (the fuel, not the drug, OK :-))
>was used by POWs in the second world war as a detector. Using much the
>same cats whisker arangement as with the galena crystal. Might be worth
a
>try.
I will work but you want to find a peice that has really been fired and
has a
bit of rainbow color to it. IT's the contaminating oxides and all that
makes it
work though germainium is better.
>I would recomend getting the set working with a germanium diode first.
>Then, when you know the coil, tuning capacitor, headphones, aerial,
>earth, etc are OK, try the home-made detector.
Good way to go.
Allison
Can anyone point me to a good website about the Motorola 6800 (6800, not
68000)? I'm designing a simple computer around it, and need some info.
Thanks,
Owen
>That's interesting, there was an Appletalk hardware/software solution for the
>Amiga which was called... Doubletalk. It existed both as an external box for
>A500s and a Zorro card for the big boxes.
There was also the Emplant Deluxe with it's Localtalk ports, which I
used to connect my A4000 up to various Mac's. I never ran it as the Emplant
emulator but as a hardware extension of Shapeshifter's emulation.
Jeff
Speaking of the fastpath4 boxes, is anyone interested in two of them? I have
no interest in them right now. Prefer trades for IBM stuff, primarily PS/2.
Extra credit given if anyone can find me a Serverguard card for a PS/2.
In a message dated 3/30/01 1:34:46 PM Central Standard Time,
ethan_dicks(a)yahoo.com writes:
<< --- Mike Ford <mikeford(a)socal.rr.com> wrote:
> >--- Mike Ford <mikeford(a)socal.rr.com> wrote:
> >
> >I take it you resolved the issue of ROM code, driver software, etc. I
still
> >have that Fastpath4 sitting idle, waiting for the chance to put it to use.
> >
> >Any pointers on how to get it up and active?
>
> RTFM ;)
Love to. Need the FM.
> The FastPath is the most powerfull of the boxes that I know of, supporting
> the bridging of a complete localtalk LAN to a ethernet network, with both
> Appletalk and TCP/IP support among other features.
Perfect.
>>
I recognized a CRT tube at the local surplus place (R@RE NEW IN BOX! :-)
that looked like the CRT from a VT320 and I bought it ($2.14 including
tax), took it home and opened up my worst VT320 (this is one I had already
tweaked the internal "brightness control" so that I had enough raster to
see it) and sure enough, same Phillips part number. So I carefully
disassembled the VT320, removed the old tube, put in the replacement tube,
and voila` a nice bright VT320 with no screen burn at all. Alas it was yet
another amber tube, I really wish I could find some green tubes which I prefer.
Anyway, yet another piece of classic equipment, brought back into peak
operating efficiency.
--Chuck
On March 30, Tony Duell wrote:
> IMHO yes. Not the _original_ type, but a crystal set none-the-less. It
> uses equivalent components in the same circuit. And some germanium diodes
> (at least over here) appear to have a crystal and catswhisker in them.
Same over here...some silicon diodes as well. That's a
point-contact electrode for the anode if memory serves.
> Some old service manuals (I am showing my age now), used CRxx as a
> designation for 'semiconductor diode' in the parts lists and schematics.
> I always assumed CR stood for Crystal Rectifier.
CR does indeed stand for Crystal Rectifier. At least in the stuff
I've seen over here..
-Dave McGuire
Nope, the Sun video connectors are called 13W3's.
At 09:46 AM 3/30/01 +0100, you wrote:
> > It's video, and the official designation is PITA-23. :-P
>
>ha ha - ditto on the DA26 my Xterm uses - trying to find a connector for
>that was impossible. Ended up soldering a PC VGA connector to the board via
>a short bit of cable and using that instead :-)
>
>What about the Sun monitor connectors with the embedded 3 connectors for RGB
>- do they still fall under the same D-type categorisation?
>
>cheers
>
>Jules
On Mar 29, 19:05, Tony Duell wrote:
> I can't think of a 405-line only (as opposed to dual-standard 405/625
> switchable) portable with an isolated chassis (and presumably transistors
> at least in the signal stages?). I don't suppose you can remember the
> manufacturer, can you?
Nope, I can't even remember the nationality :-) Maybe I'm remembering
wronly about it being single-standard, but I don't think so. And I don't
recall any transistors. I *think* it was isolated-chassis, but I also
remember adding fairly high-voltage non-polar caps to the video input.
About the only thing I can remember is that it was a wooden case with
channel selector and ON/Volume (I think) on the top, and finished in
tasteful dark green leatherette.
Unfortunately I've nothing left from that set now -- the top few lines of
the display were never very stable on the Sorcerer (partly my kludge and
partly the Sorcerer's video signal not being quite right) so we parted
company when I bought a proper monitor.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
>
> Sure, albeit a less "authentic" one. I've always heard that
>germanium diodes are better for this (does this have something to do
>with their forward voltage drop of 0.3V vs. silicon's 0.7V?)...like
>the venerable 1N34A.
>
> -Dave McGuire
>
Yes... A silicon diode will require a stronger signal to overcome the .7
volt threshold.
Since we've already violated the purist aspects by using a semiconductor
diode, you could use a battery to apply a forward bias to the diode. In this
model, the signal doesn't need to overcome the entire .7 volt forward bias
voltage and makes a radio that is MUCH more sensitive.
Steve
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
Sure, albeit a less "authentic" one. I've always heard that
germanium diodes are better for this (does this have something to do
with their forward voltage drop of 0.3V vs. silicon's 0.7V?)...like
the venerable 1N34A.
-Dave McGuire
On March 30, Richard Erlacher wrote:
> Well, if the purpose of the crystal + (what we used was a safety-pin) is to
> function as a diode, then is it still a crystal radio if a diode is used
> instead?
>
> Dick
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Tony Duell" <ard(a)p850ug1.demon.co.uk>
> To: <classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org>
> Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2001 10:58 AM
> Subject: Re: Crystal Radios (was Re: List spammer ID'd)
>
>
> > >
> > > When I built mine, we (the CubScout pack) used toilet paper roll cores which
> we
> > > varnished and then applied our magnet wire. We even went rock hunting to
> find
> > > galena crystals to use. I don't remember any sort of diode ... there
> could've
> > > been one, though ... that was nearly 50 years ago, after all.
> >
> > The galena + catswhisker is a (poor-quality) diode.
> >
> > My suggestion to use a ready-made diode (in the UK I'd use something like
> > an OA81) is that you know that diode is good. You can then wind the coil
> > and wire up the rest of the set, knowing that if it doesn't work the
> > problem is not due to the fact you've not found a spot of the right
> > impurities in the crystal. When you've got it working, you can then swap
> > the diode for the crystal and catswhisker, knowing that if it doesn't
> > work the problem is with that.
> >
> > Otherwise there are too many variables IMHO.
> >
> > -tony
> >
> >
>------------------------------
>
>Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2001 10:55:31 -0800 (PST)
>From: "Eric J. Korpela" <korpela(a)ellie.ssl.berkeley.edu>
>Subject: D connector tirade (was: Re: Age-old ethernet equipment)
>
>The standard options I'm aware of are:
>DE-9, DA-15, DB-25, DC-37, DD-50, DE-15, DA-26, DB-44, DC-62, DE-78,
>and the occasional 2DE-19 and 2DB-52. Those 19 pin "D style" connectors
>that Apple, Atari & NeXT were so fond of don't really count because
>they were really just an attempt to force people to buy branded
>products.
This has been bugging me for a while. NeXT mono monitor cables have
a D connector with 19 pins at either end. They are (apparently) in pretty
short supply relative to mono NeXT systems. Does anyone know the real
designation for those connectors, and whether it's practical to think about
building substitute cables?
I'm still worried that this issue may become particularly relevant
Sunday evening when Curt unloads his $1k stack of NeXT systems.
- Mark
>a few A1200 Amiga questions (do they hit the 10 year limit? I know I got my
>A500 in the early 90's, and I think A3000's were around then, right??)...
If I remember the dates correctly, the A500 was introduced in '87 as a
companion to the A2000 and the A3000 arrived on the scene in either '90 or
'91 with the A1200 in '93.
>Do all 1200's come with built in IDE hard drive controllers - or did
>commodore do things on the cheap and only add controllers for machines
>shipped with drives (I'm assuming the controller lives on the main board
>itself)?
Yes, the A1200 has built-in IDE
>Will the 1200 accept any size (capacity) drive?
I've used drives up to 4+ gig on both SCSI and IDE equipped Amiga's
without a problem.
>What are the options of networking a '1200 (ideally TCP/IP stack on the
>Amiga, using SLIP or something to a Unix box maybe? Are there things around
>that allow this, with NFS mounting of drives for data copying?)
Both Miami and Termite are good TCP/IP stacks that work with either
ethernet or dialup connections. I'm not sure about the mounting of a NFS
drive, but given how extensible the Amiga file system is, I'd hazard a guess
that it is likely possible.
>Can PC SVGA multisync monitors be used with the 1200, or won't the monitor
>sync to a low enough frequency for the Amiga (seem to remember that was the
>problem with the 500, not sure if the 1200 has any sort of 'fix' for this on
>the Amiga side though)
IF the monitor syncs down to ~15 khz it will work fine with the A1200
without any kind of scan doubler. Even the A4000 didn't fix this
compatibility with SVGA multisync monitors....for some reason only the A3000
did.
Jeff
On Mar 29, 15:40, Iggy Drougge wrote:
> Pete Turnbull skrev:
> >On Mar 29, 6:39, Iggy Drougge wrote:
> >Well, they would really all be the same network -- they'd be all one
> >collision domain (any packet or collision appearing on one port would be
> >seen on all the others. That's what a repeater does).
>
> True, but at least they will look like that and there won't be a dozen
> unused ports.
Yes, I see what you mean. You won't get any more bandwidth on any part of
the net, nor on the whole net, but you will have the advantage that it's
easier to isolate a fault if one occurs. And of course, extra
blinkenlights, which is always A Good Thing :-)
> >> What management would be involved with a repeater?
>
> >Partitioning segments [...] Monitoring traffic levels [or] types
> >[...] Keeping a list of MAC addresses [...] setting [IP address]
> > or telling [the repeater] to use bootp/dhcp) or upgrade
> >the firmware, or set passwords.
>
> That monitoring seems interesting.
If you think so, find out about SNMP (Simple Network Management Protocol)
and possibly RMON.
If you have Windows, look for the SNMP service which is buried in one of
the subdirectories on your CD; it includes "snmputil" which you can use to
retrieve or set information (but beware if you install it on an
Internet-accessible machine as it makes a lot of things available to remote
enquirers and has a lot of security problems).
If you have Linux, look on the net for UCD SNMP (which has some command
line utilities) and SNMPY or SCOTTY. There's also gxsnmp but it's only in
an early stage of development.
For a bit of fun, take a look at Netcool (expensive!) or MRTG (free!).
There's lots more, but that'll give you some idea.
http://rak.isternet.sk/linux-netman/snmp.html is a reasonable place to
start.
> >> IOW it's just a glorified OFF switch. =)
>
> >Partitioning, is, yes. Segmenting isn't, it's just a way of making one
> >big(ish) hub do the job of a few smaller ones.
>
> I was rather hoping it had that ability.
Segementing? Not many repeaters do, especially old ones, as it needs a
fair amount of extra electronics. Basically it's done by a crossbar
switch, which is inside one large ASIC in modern repeaters that provide it.
The most common form of segmenting in hubs is in dual-speed (10/100baseT)
hubs; what they really do is segment the ports into a 10baseT segment and a
100baseT segement, with a little store-and-forward switch in between.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
> It's video, and the official designation is PITA-23. :-P
ha ha - ditto on the DA26 my Xterm uses - trying to find a connector for
that was impossible. Ended up soldering a PC VGA connector to the board via
a short bit of cable and using that instead :-)
What about the Sun monitor connectors with the embedded 3 connectors for RGB
- do they still fall under the same D-type categorisation?
cheers
Jules
The March winds have been unsurpassed at depositing Macintosh parts at my
feet. Last week, at my new job, a new co-worker gave me a pair of AAUI
10BaseT transceivers; the show at Dayton disgorged a Quadra 660AV; and the
university surplus turned out to be a gold mine. For $5 each, I picked up
a 15" Mac monitor, two LC IIIs, two IIsis, an external 170Mb disk, and an Apple
external 80Mb disk. I got for free from the cable bin, some LocalTalk cables,
three LocalTalk dongles, one PhoneNet dongle (w/terminator) and three data-
center-grade AUI cables, including a DEC-branded one (perfect for my VAX8200)
Most of these accessories I've been looking for with some intensity of late.
In amongst the bits were Ethernet cards all around. I picked up the IIsis,
not for themselves, but because ISTR that the IIsi PDS slot is compatible
with the PDS slot on the SE/30. If so, then I can finally stick that SE/30
on my network without using up my one and only SCSI<->Ethernet dongle. A
surprise in the lot was inside one of the LC IIIs - an Apple IIe card. It
stood out because of the DB44? connector on the back, rather than the expected
RJ-45. I have heard of the Apple IIe compatibility card, but where can I find
a cable for this connector, which I presume is for attaching an external drive
to? I haven't gotten home yet, so I have no idea if there is software on the
Mac's drive to control it, but I hope there is.
Finally, now that I have an abundance of Ethernet-capable Macs, I want to turn
to a long-standing project - turning a Mac into an Ethernet<->LocalTalk print
server. I don't care if I have to sacrifice one of my larger Macs and run
a variety of UNIX, but what I want is to be able to print from other machines,
UNIX, Windoze, Amiga, etc., over whatever protocol I can manage to universally
support, and print to this HP Deskwriter 660 that is sitting here, lonely.
Additionally, I could drive an HP LaserJet 4/ML over the LocalTalk port from
the same print server. Are there any packages for the Mac that will let me
share the printer with non-Apple-based machines? Is there something like
CAP (Columbua AppleTalk Protocol?) for Windoze? (I've used it with Linux)
I am not a Mac newbie, but my experience with Mac printers is limited to "plug
it in, load a driver and go". I've never had to mess with them much, because
they are, in my experience, fairly well behaved. I will go RTFM once I know
where the FM is (and any software to go with it).
-ethan
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail.
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/?.refer=text
I found a really easy way to get past the prom passwords in the NVRAM
in SUN sparcstations. I have tried it on a Sparc LX,IPX, and IPC and I
really think it should work on any model.
If there is a well known fix, disregard. After much searching the web
on this, all I ever found was "replace NVRAM chip"
I will post the procedure here if anyone is interested.
Brian.
On Mar 29, 7:50, Arno Kletzander wrote:
> Just typing in snoop at the prompt ends up with
> snoop: Command not found.
> In which subdirectory might this program be (if it's on the system at
all),
> or how can we search for it? If it isn't, where can one possibly get it?
/usr/sbin/snoop on my Solaris systems -- but it might be elsewhere on an
older system, and it's not installed by default.
Alternative is tcpdump, which uses a library called libpcap. The home page
for both is http://ee.lbl.gov/ or http://www.tcpdump.org/ , and they can be
downloaded from ftp://ftp.ee.lbl.gov/ You'll need a decent C compiler --
which probably means gcc, as Sun stopped providing a compiler with the OS a
long time ago.
> The printer manual has surfaced, but it only contains the information
that
> the Ethernet card was an add-on and had its own Installation and
Configuration
> Guide with it - which must be buried even deeper than the manual itself
if
> we were given it at all
On most of the Ethernet-enabled printers I've come across (mostly HPs,
Lexmarks, and Xeroxes) you can do the setup from the front panel --
sometimes tedious, but usually not too hard to understand.
> I guess the remaining problem is really the IP address of the printer, as
> the data transfer between the computers and the printer must be all right
by
> now: Whenever a ping or something else occurs on the network, the orange
DATA
> LED on the printer's back side blinks a few times (what should indicate
it is
> receiving the data).
A reasonable assumption. Have you tried printing out status pages?
Sometimes that will show you things like IP address, protocols enabled,
that sort of thing. Usually you can do it by holding down one of the
buttons when you turn the power on.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
On Mar 29, 18:48, Mike Kenzie wrote:
> My Sparc 1+ currently fails when booting linux. I get this
> message:
>
> IDPROM: unknown format type!
> program terminating
>
> Is there a way to by pass the PROM?
>
> The current PROM is a 525-1107-04 Can other sparc PROMS be
> used as a replacement?
The IDPROM isn't a PROM, it's an NVRAM chip. I don't recognise that part
number, the usual IDPROM for a Sparcstation 1+ is 525-1109-xxx. The NVRAM
is an unusually tall 24-pin device with a barcode on the top (usually), and
I think the number you quoted is the boot EPROM, which is quite a different
thing. You could replace the IDPROM with one from another 1+, or read the
Sun NVRAM FAQ about reprogramming one, but you can't just use one from a
different type of motherboard as the type code would be wrong.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
Okay, I whipped up a quick site for my HP 9845 stuff. It has scanned
in screen shots from some of the games I wrote with a friend.
If you're curious, check it out.
http://www.sixstring.com/terry/hp9845/
I'm still hoping to find a working HP that can play these!
Terry
On Mar 29, 19:07, Tony Duell wrote:
> >
> > On Mar 29, 6:20, Iggy Drougge wrote:
> >
> > > What is a DD50? I'm thinking of the connector used on PS/2s, which
looks
> > like
> > > a small Centronics connector.
> >
> > DD50 is a large D-connector, twice as big as a DB25 :-)
>
> Not really. It isn't a super-long shell with only 2 rows of pins (which,
> becuase of the offset between the rows would imply an odd number of pins
> total). It has 3 rows of pins in a shell a little shorter (although
> wider) than the DC shell (DC37, for example).
Nitpicker! I know it has three rows, but it does occupy twice the area
(near enough) :-)
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
Saw this on comp.sys.dec, thought to pass it on:
From: <tsm(a)palindrome.org>
Newsgroups: comp.os.vms,comp.sys.dec
Subject: Free MicroVAX II, Terminals in Portland, OR
-- Please disregard this message if you are not in the Portland, Oregon
area. --
I have a MicroVAX II, which I hope to find a new owner for. It is in the
H9642 cabinet, which is about 26"x40"x36" (WxHxD), and weighs a couple of
hundred pounds. It is not fully decked out, but contains the disk, and a
complete system's worth of boards (CPU, memory, disk controller, network,
etc.). It'll take a bit of work to put back together.
I also have two LA-120's (terminal-printers), with some spare ribbons, huge
box of paper, and a box of spare parts.
I can also throw in a Wyse monitor which will work with the system. I also
have a couple of boxes full of VMS and VAX documentation to the interested
party. A couple of boxes of misc. VAX hardware also.
All of this stuff is FREE, but preference given to whoever is willing to
take the most stuff. Items located in North Portland (Rose Quarter & St.
Johns area). I will NOT ship any of this stuff (so I apologize for the
worldwide distribution of the message); taker must arrange for
transportation of equipment. You will need a van or pickup truck to haul
this stuff.
Feel free to e-mail me back, or call me at 503-240-4922 if interested.
Thanks,
Terry Murphy
>The other thing to consider is: Will OS X run at a useful speed on her
>computer? Does the new versions of Photoshop require more RAM and / or
>computing power?
I just finished an install of OS X on a Beige G3/300 with 192MB RAM and
it seems to run fine. I'm doing the initial testing on the G3/300 before
installing it on the newer G4's we have. I installed it over the top of a
current OS 8.6 setup and in fact, this email is being sent from Outlook
running on 'Classic' under OS X. The install went painlessly, the speed is
acceptable and it was quite simple getting the network settings put back to
where everything worked. OS X ships with 3 CD's, one of which is OS 9.1,
which I had to upgrade 8.6 to prior to installing OS X. 9.1 is what it
actually uses to run 'Classic' applications.
BTW, for those familiar with NeXTstep, it's easy to see the lineage
behind OS X. They even kept the spinning multicolored pinwheel while the
system is loading.
Jeff
> DE-9, DA-15, DB-25, DC-37, DD-50, DE-15, DA-26, DB-44, DC-62, DE-78,
Well, so much for tirades. :) Can't even keep them straight myself.
That should be DD-78.
Eric
Everything past the early PowerMacs is PCI, not NuBus.
I'm going to agree that there's no compelling reason for her to upgrade to
OSX. Hell, Adobe and other major vendors aren't going to have their apps
carbonized for a few months yet. OSX is not essential even on the newest G4
until there's applications that can take advantage of its next-gen
capabilities (i.e. multithreading for multiprocessing, integrated G4
acceleration). If she were to upgrade to OSX she'd still be running the
majority of her stuff in a "Classic" environment window. If she decides
she's absolutely got to keep using this localtalk printer after LocalTalk
support is dropped, perhaps she could use a LocalTalk to EtherNet adapter.
Assuming the software will support such a thing.
Once ATM and Photoshop and Freehand and Premiere and InDesign are
OSX-native, look out!
Now - who wants to help me track down a 2 to 9 gig internal SCSI harddrive
for my Quadra 700 running NetBSD that I use as my BIND and Sendmail server?
-carl
"Russ Blakeman"
<rhblake(a)bigfoot.com> To: <classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org>
Sent by: cc:
owner-classiccmp@clas Subject: RE: Apple LWPro parallel port?
siccmp.org
03/29/01 11:44 AM
Please respond to
classiccmp
I've seen NuBus centronics adapters on ebay that allow you to have a
standard 25 pin centronics compatible parallel port - you might look around
for one. I'm not sure if your machine has NuBus or PCI but I'm guessing
that it's NuBus. Why is she worried about upgrading if the OS doens't suit
her needs?
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org
[mailto:owner-classiccmp@classiccmp.org]On Behalf Of Marion Bates
Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2001 10:32 AM
To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org
Subject: OT: Apple LWPro parallel port?
Hi all,
My mom has the following setup:
- Beige G3 minitower
- Apple LaserWriter Pro 600
- OS 9.1
The printer and Mac are connected via LocalTalk. (This printer requires
AppleTalk.)
She is afraid that the next upgrade (OS X) will make the printer
unuseable, since Apple is phasing out LocalTalk (this Mac is the last
model that still comes with a damn serial port).
The printer has no Ethernet capability, but it does have a parallel port
in addition to the LocalTalk port.
The questions are: Is there any sort of hardware/software conversion kit
that would allow the Mac to use that parallel port if LocalTalk becomes
unavailable in the future? Does anyone have any experience with running OS
X and making it play nice with legacy hardware like this? Also, do they
still make LocalTalk PCI cards, and if so, is there any chance that the
drivers would work under OS X? This printer still works like new and she's
not ready to just chuck it and buy a new one.
Sigh. Old hardware doesn't wear out fast enough to keep pace with new
software. ;)
TIA,
-- Marion "Still using a PowerComputing100 with a G3 upgrade card and OS
7.6.1 so I can run my $1200 1993 Apple Color OneScanner which is not as
good as today's lamest $79 USB scanner but it still works goddammit" Bates
>I've seen NuBus centronics adapters on ebay that allow you to have a
standard 25 pin centronics
>compatible >parallel port - you might look around for one. I'm not sure if
your machine has NuBus or
>PCI but I'm guessing >that it's NuBus. Why is she worried about upgrading
if the OS doens't suit her
>needs?
The Beige G3 is a PCI based tower. It was the first G3 powered
desktop/tower that Apple sold and is generally had in speeds between 233 and
300 mhz.
Jeff
On Mar 29, 6:20, Iggy Drougge wrote:
> What is a DD50? I'm thinking of the connector used on PS/2s, which looks
like
> a small Centronics connector.
DD50 is a large D-connector, twice as big as a DB25 :-)
"A small Centronics" connector could be lots of things, but if you mean a
half-pitch connector with clips, that's a half-density 50-pin D-connector
(even though it doesn't look quite like a miniaturised D-connector), and is
the device recommended in the SCSI-2 standard.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
On Mar 29, 0:31, Tony Duell wrote:
> Looking at Poole&Molloy (Radio and Television Servicing -- annual volumes
> that cover the major TVs and radios for each year), it's amazing how many
> sets from nominally different manufactures contain the same chassis...
I know. Sometimes there only seem to be about two or three "current"
models (plus variations for tube size).
> The result was that my parents ordered the failed servoid out of the
> house, returned the rented TV, and I've been landed with repair jobs here
> ever since.
LOL! Serves you right!
> > 405-line 14" 'portable'.
> Converting a 405 line set to a (presumably 625 line) monitor is not the
> most trivial job, I wouldn't have thought. Don't tell me it was a live
> chassis set as well....
No, thankfully it wasn't. I don't recall having to do much to change the
frequencies, though.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
>Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2001 01:34:58 +0100 (BST)
>From: ard(a)p850ug1.demon.co.uk (Tony Duell)
>Subject: Re: ZX-TEAM meeting/TS1000 least expandable???
>
>> I thought that since the ZX80's memory couldn't be expanded, there were
no
>> expansion port either.
>
>I am sure I've seen Sinclair adverts for a 16K RAM pack for the ZX80. And
>maybe a smaller RAM pack (3K? 4K?) as well. I always assumed the
>connector was the same, because things like the ZX printer would work on
>the ZX80 if you fitted the later ROM, I think.
My ZX80 came with a ZX81 16K RAM pack and it works fine; ISTR physical
differences aside the only real difference between the 80 and 81 was the ROM
anyway, so by the time you'd bunged a 81 ROM in your 80 you ended up with an
81! The ROM even came with a 81 keyboard, overlay or real keyboard; can't
remember which.
The Jupiter Ace had a 4K RAM pack as well as a 16K one, and if anyone has a
spare Ace (UK) or Ace 4000 (US) I'd be happy to take it off them :o)
--
Adrian Graham MCSE/ASE/MCP
C CAT Limited
Gubbins: http://www.ccat.co.uk (work)
<http://www.snakebiteandblack.co.uk> (home)
<http://www.binarydinosaurs.co.uk> (The Online Computer Museum, now W3C
compliant!)
0/0
>Hi all,
>
>My mom has the following setup:
>
>- Beige G3 minitower
>- Apple LaserWriter Pro 600
>- OS 9.1
>
>The printer and Mac are connected via LocalTalk. (This printer requires
>AppleTalk.)
>
>She is afraid that the next upgrade (OS X) will make the printer unuseable,
>since Apple is phasing out LocalTalk (this Mac is the last model that still
>comes with a damn serial port).
My first suggestion would be that, unless she has a specific reason for
upgrading to OS X, she should stay with 9.1. Like all Version 1.0 items, OS
X is going to need a few things worked out and will likely be adopted
immediately by: a) developers, b) hard core geeks that just have to have the
latest and greatest thing released, c) people that don't know any better and
give in to some form or another of pressure to upgrade. She'd be better off
waiting for it to mature a little bit, especially if she is just a casual
user.
As for the serial ports, since the Beige G3 is a supported machine, I
would thing that it's serial ports would be supported as well. The only G3
or newer system not supported by OS X is the original G3 Powerbook.
Jeff
>That's interesting, there was an Appletalk hardware/software solution for the
>Amiga which was called... Doubletalk. It existed both as an external box for
>A500s and a Zorro card for the big boxes.
There was also the Emplant Deluxe with it's Localtalk ports, which I
used to connect my A4000 up to various Mac's. I never ran it as the Emplant
emulator but as a hardware extension of Shapeshifter's emulation.
Jeff
IBM mainframes, Hitachi mainframes, and Amdahl mainframes.. They sound like
they're 3380-equivalent, at least the Amdahls do. I wish they were closer,
or I'd buy 'em, could use more storage.
Will J
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
On Mar 29, 6:39, Iggy Drougge wrote:
> I see. I really must create a lot of small networks now, so that I may
> saturate all those ports.
Well, they would really all be the same network -- they'd be all one
collision domain (any packet or collision appearing on one port would be
seen on all the others. That's what a repeater does).
> What management would be involved with a repeater? All other hubs and
> repeaters I've used have been entirely automatic.
Partitioning segments deliberately, eg to lock out a faulty host -- maybe
one that's jabbering, or responding to things it shouldn't -- or an
intruder. Monitoring traffic levels (counting packets, octets, collisions,
etc). Monitoring traffic types (unicast packets, multicast packets,
broadcast packets). Keeping a list of MAC addresses seen. Since all this
is usually done by talking to the repeater (or whatever) over the network,
the repeater itself has to have an IP address, and so there are ways to set
that up (setting it by hand, or telling it to use bootp/dhcp) or upgrade
the firmware, or set passwords for read/write operations.
> I'd think so too, but I heard on Usenet that old repeaters (the kind
which
> actually call themselves repeaters =) could slow down modern networks.
Don't
> ask me how, though.
I don't see why, if you're talking about repeaters. Old switches might
well be slow, since they work on a store-and-forward basis. A repeater
("hub") works on the bit level; a switch works at the packet level and
looks at the type and addressing of each packet before passing it on.
Newer switches use ASICs to do this in hardware at wire speed, older ones
use more conventional processing (or a combination).
> >> What does partitioning actually entail?
>
> >See above. Some more modern 3Com hubs also have the capability to split
> >the unit into segments (eg, the SuperStack II PS 40 hubs and others can
> >have 4 segments) but assigning ports to different segments isn't usually
> >called partitioning.
>
> IOW it's just a glorified OFF switch. =)
Partitioning, is, yes. Segmenting isn't, it's just a way of making one
big(ish) hub do the job of a few smaller ones.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
Yes, you can do that and the perfomance is very good on the
K2-350 box here at work. I use teh 3.5" loaded one to install windows and apps as it's faster than 4x CDrom and since some systems here dont have cdrom at all it really beats floppies
or sucking it down the 10mbs eitherpipe.
I've never tried to boot one directly but I have used one as
C: via floppy boot for W95.
Allison
------Original Message------
From: "Richard Erlacher" <edick(a)idcomm.com>
To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org
Sent: March 29, 2001 4:30:02 AM GMT
Subject: Re: ide harddrive
IF you have a DLL to support EPP under W9x, you can certainly do that. I've not
yet found one that comes with enough pre-sale doc to verify that it's up to that
kind of performance. There are a few PCI parallel port boards that claim to
have the speed, however. I tabled my S-100 bus probe a year or more ago for the
simple reason that the ports on the motherboards I was considering were not fast
enough. The PCI ones may breathe new life into the project.
The datasheet for the SMC34C60 turned up immediately on a search via GOOGLE.COM.
There's an IP product that pops up too, perhaps worth a look. Be careful not to
mix up the EPP and ECP functions on the SMC part! The two are TOTALLY
different!
Dick
----- Original Message -----
From: "ajp166" <ajp166(a)bellatlantic.net>
To: <classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org>
Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2001 7:46 PM
Subject: Re: ide harddrive
> From: Richard Erlacher <edick(a)idcomm.com>
>
> >I'd be VERY interested in seeing that schematic, Tony! I've no doubt
> that it can be done, but I wonder how fast it will be.
>
> The commercial ones are at least several mb/sec using drives designed for
> DMA33. Only took a minute or less to transfer a set of 28 .CAB files
> (w95).
>
> The device driver runs as a SCSI device under W9x or NT4.
>
Undoubtedly that's a driver for the device under Windows, and not a generic port
driver. Too bad ...
>
> Allison
>
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: "Tony Duell" <ard(a)p850ug1.demon.co.uk>
> >To: <classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org>
> >Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2001 11:01 AM
> >Subject: Re: ide harddrive
> >
> >
> >> >
> >> > Evening folks, I am looking for a circuit using the parallel port on
> a
> >> > pc to Ide interface, does anyone have a schematic for one?
> >>
> >> Somewhere I have an data sheet for a chip to convert a parallel port
> into
> >> an ISA slot. No, I don't mean a chip for adding a printer port to the
> ISA
> >> bus (like the 82C11 does), I mean a chip that connects to a parallel
> port
> >> (either 'original' or one of the enhanced bidirectional ports), and to
> >> some DRAM, and which allows you to connect anything that you'd
> normally
> >> connect to ISA on the other side of it. It allows you to read/write
> any
> >> port or memory location from the parallel port side, it allows the ISA
> >> device to do DMA into the memory hung off the chip (which can then be
> >> read/written from the parellel port), and so on.
> >>
> >> I think it was made by SMC, but don't quote me on that.
> >>
> >> It looked like a fun device to work with, but I don't know where on
> earth
> >> you'd find one.
> >>
> >> If anyone is interested, I will try and find the data sheet and post
> the
> >> number of the device.
> >>
> >> -tony
> >>
> >>
> >
>
>
> Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2001 19:36:07 +0100 (BST)
> From: ard(a)p850ug1.demon.co.uk (Tony Duell)
> Subject: Re: ZX80/81 expansion
>
> > My ZX80 came with a ZX81 16K RAM pack and it works fine;
> ISTR physical
> > differences aside the only real difference between the 80
> and 81 was the ROM
>
> I thought the ZX81 hardware provided some kind of interrupt
> to the Z80 to
> allow for 'simultaneous' processing and display, and that you
> couldn't
> get this on the ZX80 simply by dropping in the new ROM. There were
> various circuits (a couple of TTL chips IIRC) to add this
> feature to the
> ZX80, though.
Yah, the ZX80 couldn't think and talk at the same time so it blanked the
screen while it was processing! In the ZX81 this was known as FAST mode,
with the slower SLOW mode being able to do both. However, this still meant
that in SLOW mode the machine was 4 times slower than in FAST! Probably
sometime tonight I'll upload the Your Computer reviews of the ZX81, Jupiter
Ace and a couple of others for your reading pleasure, unless you've already
got them round somewhere. Oh, hang on, you're text only aren't you?
> Keyboard overlay I think. The keyboards were somewhat different
> physically, weren't they -- the ZX80 used contacts on the
> main PCB, the
> ZX81 had a separate membrane keyboard linked up with tapewire.
<thinks>. Yep. Looking at the pic on the museum site the keyboard is part of
the main PCB, whereas on the ZX81 it was separate. I still think its funny
to look at the design for the ZX80 and compare it with the heath-robinson
nature of the Issue 1 Spectrum :o)
> I have an Ace, but it's not 'spare' if you see what I mean.
Bugger :)
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2001 22:21:07 +0000
> From: jpero(a)sympatico.ca
> Subject: Re: MacOS on CD-ROM? (was Re: Mac SE/30)
>
> The biggest difference this Basilisk II is freeware where other
> emulators you talked about ( saw them ) are payware.
I think I need to get my paws on that then......
--
Adrian Graham MCSE/ASE/MCP
C CAT Limited
Gubbins: http://www.ccat.co.uk (work)
<http://www.snakebiteandblack.co.uk> (home)
<http://www.binarydinosaurs.co.uk> (The Online Computer Museum)
0/0
On Mar 28, 22:50, Paul Braun wrote:
> But if you REALLY want to do it right, you wind your own coil on a
> shellacked oatmeal box.....or, a shellacked salt box.
>
> All of mine used a germanium diode and a prewound coil, so there.
> I'll shut up now.
:-)
Everyone (at least, everyone in the UK) knows you wind a hundred turns[1]
or so of 24swg DCC (double cotton covered) copper wire (actually, I used
enamelled copper) on a toilet roll centre, to make a coil about 2" long.
I recall one maths teacher using a toilet roll centre for some
demonstration in a maths class (nothing to do with radio or electronics).
In his distinctive accent, which was all the more noticable to Scottish
schoolchildren, he announced that this was a "wiyah fohmah". Despite
heckling, he subsequently refused to acknowledge that it might have had any
connection with more mundane functions.
[1] to be honest, I can't remember the standard number of turns. It might
have been less than a hundred, and I'm too lazy to work it out right now.
And it doesn't have to be 24swg, you just use whatever you can scrounge.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
OT, sorry - but are there any SCSI fans on the list who know anything about
the SCSI SCA standard? If so can you dro me an email off-list if you know
the answer to the following...
I've got a couple of drives with SCA connectors and adapters plugged into
them to bring them out to the more normal 68-pin connectors. There's a bunch
of inline resistors on each adaptor which I'd like to know whether they are
terminators or just something that's needed when connecting an SCA device to
a normal SCSI bus.
Both drives work together happily despite the resistors (have been doing for
the last 2 years anyway) which surprises me if those are terminators, but
nothing works if I try to chain anything else onto the same bus which makes
me wonder...
ps. one of the drives is 6 years old, but not ten - so take notice of 60% of
this email or something :-)
cheers
Jules
Peter Turnbull wrote:
>Another way to see what's happening, is to use 'snoop' if you have it
>on one of the Suns (tcpdump for Linux/BSD/etc is similar).
Just typing in snoop at the prompt ends up with
snoop: Command not found.
In which subdirectory might this program be (if it's on the system at all),
or how can we search for it? If it isn't, where can one possibly get it?
The printer manual has surfaced, but it only contains the information that
the Ethernet card was an add-on and had its own Installation and Configuration
Guide with it - which must be buried even deeper than the manual itself if
we were given it at all
I guess the remaining problem is really the IP address of the printer, as
the data transfer between the computers and the printer must be all right by
now: Whenever a ping or something else occurs on the network, the orange DATA
LED on the printer's back side blinks a few times (what should indicate it is
receiving the data).
--
GMX - Die Kommunikationsplattform im Internet.
http://www.gmx.net
From: Richard Erlacher <edick(a)idcomm.com>
>I'd be VERY interested in seeing that schematic, Tony! I've no doubt
that it
>can be done, but I wonder how fast it will be.
The commercial ones are at least several mb/sec using drives designed for
DMA33. Only took a minute or less to transfer a set of 28 .CAB files
(w95).
The device driver runs as a SCSI device under W9x or NT4.
Allison
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Tony Duell" <ard(a)p850ug1.demon.co.uk>
>To: <classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org>
>Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2001 11:01 AM
>Subject: Re: ide harddrive
>
>
>> >
>> > Evening folks, I am looking for a circuit using the parallel port on
a
>> > pc to Ide interface, does anyone have a schematic for one?
>>
>> Somewhere I have an data sheet for a chip to convert a parallel port
into
>> an ISA slot. No, I don't mean a chip for adding a printer port to the
ISA
>> bus (like the 82C11 does), I mean a chip that connects to a parallel
port
>> (either 'original' or one of the enhanced bidirectional ports), and to
>> some DRAM, and which allows you to connect anything that you'd
normally
>> connect to ISA on the other side of it. It allows you to read/write
any
>> port or memory location from the parallel port side, it allows the ISA
>> device to do DMA into the memory hung off the chip (which can then be
>> read/written from the parellel port), and so on.
>>
>> I think it was made by SMC, but don't quote me on that.
>>
>> It looked like a fun device to work with, but I don't know where on
earth
>> you'd find one.
>>
>> If anyone is interested, I will try and find the data sheet and post
the
>> number of the device.
>>
>> -tony
>>
>>
>
From: Richard Erlacher <edick(a)idcomm.com>
>I've seen, and, in fact, own, several parallel port to SCSI interfaces,
but
>never a parallel port to IDE type. It's quite conceivable, though. The
>software would be a pain, however.
I have one for Parallel to 3.5" IDE and another for parallel to 2.5" ide.
They work quite well and are much faster than zip or jazz drives.
Also with ECP or EPP the transfers are 8bit bidirectional. The logic
to do that is fairly simple as you simply stack up bytes or half bytes
until you have a 16bit word to write and to read you reverse that to
move successive chunks.
Allison
>From: "Russ Blakeman" <rhblake(a)bigfoot.com>
>To: <classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org>
>Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2001 5:32 AM
>Subject: RE: ide harddrive
>
>
>> I thought I've seen external cases for IDE HDD's off parallel ports
before,
>> I'll have to run back through my feeble memory banks and figure out
where I
>> saw one.
>>
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: owner-classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org
>> > [mailto:owner-classiccmp@classiccmp.org]On Behalf Of Clint Wolff
(VAX
>> > collector)
>> > Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2001 11:33 PM
>> > To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org
>> > Subject: Re: ide harddrive
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > it'd be a fairly complicated schematic... The IDE interface is 16
bit
>> > wide data, and a standard parallel port only has four bits of input.
>> > An enhanced parallel port (EPP) can turn the data bits around, but
>> > then you don't have any lines for RD*/WR*/A0-A2/CS1Fx*CS3Fx*, etc...
>> >
>> > I certainly wouldn't want to do it, though I'm sure it can be
done...
>> >
>> > clint
>> >
>> > On Tue, 27 Mar 2001, bill claussen wrote:
>> >
>> > > Evening folks, I am looking for a circuit using the parallel port
on a
>> > > pc to Ide interface, does anyone have a schematic for one?
>> > >
>> > > I also have 20 (2.5 in) toshiba 4.8 gig drives (new and in sealed
>> > > antistatic). these are 2 mm interface ata4 44pin that I will
offer to
>> > > sell to the group before listing them at ebay. ($75 ea + shipping)
>> > >
>> > > I also have AMD K6-2 233 AFR Socket 7 processors (new) these also
will
>> > > be offered to the group for ($20 ea), before I place them on ebay
as
>> > > well.
>> > >
>> > > I am going to put them up in two weeks, so if any one is
interested
>> > > please email me at
>> > > elecdata(a)kcinter.net
>> > >
>> > > Thanks
>> > >
>> > > Bill Claussen
>> > > Elecdata1 (ebay)
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>
ard(a)p850ug1.demon.co.uk (Tony Duell) wrote:
> I've found enough of the data sheet (long story) to be able to say that
> the device in question (printer port -> ISA slot, in that direction) is
> the SMC34C60 (it was made by SMC, I remembered it correctly).
>
> I don't know if you can still get a data sheet (it was about 6 years ago
> I was looking at this), but it might be worth trying to hunt it down
Don't know how much this will help you, Tony, but keying "34C60" into
www.google.com brings up a link to a PDF datasheet as the first item:
http://www.smsc.com/main/datasheets/34c60.pdf
-Frank McConnell
From: Mike Ford <mikeford(a)socal.rr.com>
>>I'm old, dirts older. When I was in school you were really cool of
your
>>radio
>>had six transistors, cooler if it had FM and rich if your portable tape
>
>Are you sure you weren't trying to impress people with the catwhisker on
>your crystal set? ;)
I still have a few feet of very thin phosphorBronze wire from that! Nice
springy material.
The first one used a commercial diode but otherwise traditional. Later
on
I tried a long list of other rectifing materials:
Galena,
Carborundum
Super-Blue blade and pencil
CupricOxide
selenium (from a rectifier)
Silver oxides and sulphides
Rusty nails
I'd read about these in various books as a kid.
Allison
From: Bryan Pope <bpope(a)wordstock.com>
>Shack), but a razor blade and pencil lead... How do you put it
together?
Substitue the blade and pencil lead for the diode in a standard ckt.
The key is the blade be used some (corrosion) and you probe it for the
spot that renders a crude rectifieng junction.
Allison
From: R. D. Davis <rdd(a)smart.net>
>My crystal radio used a germanium diode as well - it was one of those
>Radio Shack kits back in the 1970's.... still have it somewhere.
I have no pretense of my age. By the 1970s I was working as a radio
tech (land mobile and marine) with a commercial license.
>time I checked, there were a few places still selling real "cats
>whiskers" (no - you don't catch the neighbor's cat to get one of these
Cats whisker is a thin peice of springy phospor bronze wire. Try a
peice of had drawn #30 copper with the end filed or cut to a point.
Allison
From: Russ Blakeman <rhblake(a)bigfoot.com>
>I don't think Allison's quite that old but neither am I. I can remember
>JFK's funeral on TV (BW Motorola) and they made one of the best Chevy's
when
>I was born (57) and I don't think Allison is much off from that. At
least
>she won't tell us I'm sure.
Thankyou but... I watched JFK too, Sylvania 21". Heard it on AM
broadcast
regen I'd brought to school. I was pre-'57 Chevy though my parents had
a 57 nomad wagon.
Allison
From: Russ Blakeman <rhblake(a)bigfoot.com>
>Six transistors? Hell most people on the list here had to go home after
>school to listen to info on the radio about the bombing of Japan.
That was by time I was in middle school. before that it was a Philco
AA5 (Tube set).
Allison
From: Pete Turnbull <pete(a)dunnington.u-net.com>
>Don't be silly. My crystal set had a germanium diode, and I bet
Allison's
>did too :-)
V1 did. I was an avid experimenter. By 1963 I was using transistors in
a regen.
Allison
Is this a similar keyboard then the one from a TRS80 model 2000? Looks a lot
like the same on the photos I have seen...and since the machine are from a
similar "era"...
If thats the case, I hooked up a more recent Tandy TX (83 Keys?) keyboard to
an old TRS80 model 2000 and all works fine...the pinout on the connector is
just not the same (I made an DIN adapter plug so I did not have to modify
the TX keyboard)...
I suspect this might also work fort machines like the TRS80 model IVP...and
similars...
Claude
>---------- Forwarded message ----------
>Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 11:20:53 -0500
>From: Club 27 <thomas_disher(a)sympatico.ca
<mailto:thomas_disher@sympatico.ca
<mailto:thomas_disher@sympatico.ca> > >
>Subject: Need Tandy 6000 Keyboard
>
>Dear Museum founder: Have a Tandy 6000 HD system operating in Xenix.
>Have all the original 8 ? " floppies for the OS, and for 'Scripsit' (Word
>Processing), and for 'Unify' (a RDMS) -- including all the Owners Manuals,
>and even the Technical Service Manual. However, I really need to keep
>this old mini-computer working for another 2 years before I pass it along
>to some collector or museum.
> I am prepared to make a deal (YOU can set the terms) with the
>individual who is directly instrumental in providing the assistance I need
>to keep my keyboard operational or who can assist me to acquire one or
>preferably two old keyboards for this unit. The problem is that the
>individual key contacts are failing, one after another. They are easily
>repaired/replaced-but I have run out of the ability to switch the sound
>contact pads from the seldom used redundant keys to those that have
>failed. I am unable to find a source for these wee electrical contacts,
>and am looking to - beg, borrow or steal, or buy - a whole keyboard or two
>from which I can pirate the needed parts.
> Can you help me, and/or redirect me ? What would be your terms ?
>Tom - at Club 27
>
On Mar 28, 17:22, John Honniball wrote:
> Well, I can remember the days of 405-line TV here in
> England. We watched it on a valve set made by Pye (now
> part of Philips). By the time of the Moon landings we had
> dual-standard 405/625 and VHF/UHF sets. Oh, and BBC 2 was
> a new channel on UHF, 625-line only!
I had a collection of Ferguson 405-line sets. They all seemed to be
remarkably similar inside, and by the time I was about 14 I got to be
reasonably good at fixing them. My first "video monitor" was a cast-off
405-line 14" 'portable'. I stripped out the tuner (it was a turret tuner
and almost every segment was broken) and some of the RF valves. It had a
series heater chain so I added a few high-wattage resistors to make up for
that, and tweaked the circuit a bit to handle the video from my first Exidy
Sorcerer.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
From: Jeffrey S. Sharp <jss(a)ou.edu>
>I'm 22. These were cool when I was in early grade school. If you
wanted to
>be the coolest kid, your boombox had a TV and detachable speakers.
I'm old, dirts older. When I was in school you were really cool of your
radio
had six transistors, cooler if it had FM and rich if your portable tape
could take
5 or 7" reels.
Allison
On Mar 28, 21:43, Peter Joules wrote:
> I remember my prep school trying to raise funds to buy a reel to reel
video
> recorder (1969). My dad said that it was a ridiculous idea - "no one
will
> ever want to record TV programmes"
The school I worked in around 1981 was still using B/W reel-to-reel video.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
On Mar 28, 19:18, Tony Duell wrote:
> > I do remember my father buying a Philips Compact Cassette recorder when
> > they were new and even cooler than my 7-transistor radio finished in
red
>
> Cassette? Heck, I've got a portable reel-to-reel audio recorder here.
> I've even got a portable reel-to-reel _video_ recorder and camera that is
> still operational. And a portable U-matic recorder in need of a little
TLC...
Well, he already had a Ferrograph reel-to-reel, to replace the old Grundig
reel-to-reel he had before :-) He was into gadgets. I had a little
portable reel-to-reel, it took 3" reels.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
In a message dated 3/26/01 3:07:26 PM Central Standard Time, azog(a)azog.org
writes:
<< I think I recall seeing somewhere that you can bypass extensions on bootup
by pressing a shift key, but that didn't work, so I assume that this isn't
an extension, but something intergral into the OS itself... >>
no password schemes are in the os itself. try holding down the left shift key
again as soon as you see the happy mac. if its system 7 or higher, it will
say extensions disabled. if that don't work, you'll need to find a system
floppy to boot from so you can mount the hard drive and take a look around.
Such as http://members.aol.com/djadamson7/articles/foxhole.html
-----Original Message-----
From: Lawrence LeMay [mailto:lemay@cs.umn.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2001 2:38 PM
To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org
Subject: Re: Crystal Radios (was Re: List spammer ID'd)
They are known as Foxhole Radios, and you can find more information by
using a web search engine.
-Lawrence LeMay
Woah, just stepped over the threshold from reading to contributing - even if
it's only a question :-)
I've a TK50 drive that I'm trying to get to work with my Vax.
After discovering that it didn't work (the tape never wound itself out into
the drive) I took off the cover.
There appears to be a piece of stiffish tape connected to the central spinny
bit (okay, I know stiffish, and spinny bit aren't the most technical of
words! :-), but the other end appears to have been chewed off. I presume
this would have the task of extracting the tape from the cartridge.
Is there anyplace I can get spares for this part (in the UK), or
instructions for constructing something similar myself (I've got a few
sacrifical tapes while I experiment).
I'd be grateful for any ideas. In fact I'm intrigued how the things meant to
work!
Cheers,
Duncan.
Hi,
I'm new to the group. Does anyone have any information on the old HP
9845 desktop computers, specifically, if any working units still exist?
I have manuals and a bunch of old software, including some extremely
high-end games, both on 8" floppy and on tape. I'd love to at least be
able to pull off some listings or get some of the data transferred to a
current medium.
Thanks.
RT
Hi, I have a 'Morse Technologies KP 286HF' mainboard with
an AMD-Processor - the board works, but I don't have the slightest
idea about the jumper settings ... I put 4 MB in it, but it only
recognizes 640Kb and I assume, that for clocking it to 12Mhz the
(not available) Turbo-Button should be pressed ?!?
For any hints or links to manuals I would be very glad ...
Cheers,
Mario
At 12:21 AM 3/27/01 -0800, you wrote:
>> > There I found and passed up a HP 9000 835 and a HP 9836A. BUT I did
>> > bring home a HP 9000 520 (aka HP 9020). :-)
>
>Can a 9000-520 read 9845 disks/tapes?
I don't know but the drive on the 520 is 5 1/4" and I think you said
that your disks were 8" so that won't work. Besides my 520 seems to have
problems.
What kind of drive were your 8" disks recorded on? The HP 9885 and
9895 are very different. FWIW I have both. I'd guessing that the best way
to read your disk would be an one of the NEWER 9000 series 200 or 300
machines such as a 9836. How many disk do you have that need to be
transferred anyway?
Joe
>
>I'll ask my ex-NASA buddies if they still have any 9000 stuff. (They
>replaced our 9845 with those right after I left.)
>
>RT
>
At 12:20 AM 3/27/01 -0800, you wrote:
>
>
>> P.S. If the BASIC listing uses keywords in optional ROMs, and the working
>> machine doesn't have those ROMs, what happens when you try to print out the
>> listing?
>
>Good question....
>
I don't know for sure but it will probably print something like "XROM
xx,yy". That's what some of the other HPs do. xx will be an id number
assigned to that ROM and yy will be the number of the routine in the ROM.
XROM of courxe means eXternal ROM. XROM xx,yy is how HP usually encodes
the call in memory. If the ROM is present then the routine name will be
printed (or executed in the run mode) otherwise it prints the XROM message
(or halts with an error and displays the XROM numbers in run mode).
I have plenty of 9845 ROMs, I can probably loan you what you need.
Joe
Here's the URL to Jim Brick's website. As many of you may well know,
Brick was co-author of _Bit-Slice Microprocessor Design_ with John Mick.
http://www.brick.org/jim/
Sellam Ismail Vintage Computer Festival
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
International Man of Intrigue and Danger http://www.vintage.org
>Jeff Hellige skrev:
>Well, transceivers do have the tendency to fall off their mounting point... =)
>As for the size of AUI transceivers, they have been absolutely gargantuan once
>upon a time. We've got a BULL 10B2 transceiver connected to a pocket hub at
>the usergroup, and the transceiver actually dwarfs the hub!
>Then again, I have a stack of pocket transceivers which are actually smaller
>than my AAUI ones.
>The cable is a nice addition, though.
I actually came up with an HP transceiver that proves my own point
invalid. It's about the size of a zippo cigarette lighter, but a little
thicker. It's a model# 28685B Ethertwist transceiver and it has dip
switches to enable SQE, Link and Loopback test as well as use of a long
cable. It also has 6 status LEDS near the 10base-T connector. I do have a
small 5-port hub that isn't much larger than some of the AAUI transceivers I
have though.
Jeff
If anyone has a programmer's manual for either of these daisywheel
printers, I'd really love to know how to invoke the following functions:
DECFIL (Right Justification)
DECFPP (Positioning)
DECPSPP (Print Specified Printwheel Position)
DECPTS (Printwheel Table Select)
DECSS (Set Space Size)
DECUND (Programmable Underline Character)
I don't need full descriptions, but I would like to know the sequence in
the form:
CSI ? 80 h
or
CSI Ps ; Ps " z
I have a database that is supposed to cover every ANSI-compliant
sequence for DEC terminals and printers, but it has some gaps!
Cheers,
Paul
I just picked up a complete Sparc 10 system and I am having some video
problems. When the system boots, the video is all ripped and looks like
it wants to be in two columns. It seems to be in the wrong video mode.
It does the same thing with both the mono monitor and color monitor I
have for it. Popped the cover and it has a SUN GX video option board
installed.
Any idea's?
Thanks,
Brian.
Here's something I found this morning that I thought some of you might
be interested in. It's a graphing of the Unix timeline/family tree by Eric
Levenez:
http://perso.wanadoo.fr/levenez/unix/history.html
Jeff
On Mar 28, 1:33, Tony Duell wrote:
>On Mar 28, 0:52, Iggy Drougge wrote:
> > As for impedance, I was under the impression, judging from the current
> > discussion on the topic of 10B5 wiring, that the actual work of making
the AUI
> > output ethernet-worthy lay in the transceiver.
>
> That's one part of it. But the AUI interface is part of the standard too
> -- any device should be able to work with any transceiver. The AUI
> interface consists of 3 differential ECL signals (AC coupled
> essentially), which should be carried on twisted-pair transmission lines
> (I think the characteristic impedance is somewhere around 100 Ohms, but
> don't quote me on that).
78 ohms. The standard also specifies maximum length of 50m for the thick
AUI cable, but "office grade" cables have higher losses and are typically
only rated for a quarter of that.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
On Mar 27, 20:13, Lawrence Walker wrote:
> The Atari ST is an integrated machine. I guess you mean a TT.
> Also the DEC Micros - Rainbow et al, with the LK201 KB.
The MegaST uses an RJ12 for its separate keyboard.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
Well, that last "ghetto blaster" spam was interesting in the fact that the
sender made no attempt at all to hide their identity, or to relay through
open third-party servers. Because of this, I believe it may just have been
sheer ignorance on the part of bitways that turned them to the Dark Side of
the 'Net.
I've fired off a LART to mediascape.de, which appears to be the upstream
provider for the company that did the deed. I will know shortly if this is
true.
Maybe we could all chip in and send them a ten-year old boom-box? ;-)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Bruce Lane, Owner and head honcho, Blue Feather Technologies
http://www.bluefeathertech.com // E-mail: kyrrin(a)bluefeathertech.com
Amateur Radio: WD6EOS since Dec. '77 (Extra class as of June-2K)
"I'll get a life when someone demonstrates to me that it would be
superior to what I have now..." (Gym Z. Quirk, aka Taki Kogoma).
>From: Ethan Dicks <ethan_dicks(a)yahoo.com>
>Subject: Mac haul and print server questions
>
>The March winds have been unsurpassed at depositing Macintosh parts at my
>feet. Last week, at my new job, a new co-worker gave me a pair of AAUI
>10BaseT transceivers; the show at Dayton disgorged a Quadra 660AV; and the
>university surplus turned out to be a gold mine. For $5 each, I picked up
>a 15" Mac monitor, two LC IIIs, two IIsis, an external 170Mb disk,
>and an Apple
>external 80Mb disk. I got for free from the cable bin, some LocalTalk cables,
>three LocalTalk dongles, one PhoneNet dongle (w/terminator) and three data-
>center-grade AUI cables, including a DEC-branded one (perfect for my VAX8200)
>Most of these accessories I've been looking for with some intensity of late.
Nice haul.
>Finally, now that I have an abundance of Ethernet-capable Macs, I want to turn
>to a long-standing project - turning a Mac into an Ethernet<->LocalTalk print
>server. I don't care if I have to sacrifice one of my larger Macs and run
>a variety of UNIX, but what I want is to be able to print from other machines,
>UNIX, Windoze, Amiga, etc., over whatever protocol I can manage to universally
>support, and print to this HP Deskwriter 660 that is sitting here, lonely.
>Additionally, I could drive an HP LaserJet 4/ML over the LocalTalk port from
>the same print server. Are there any packages for the Mac that will let me
>share the printer with non-Apple-based machines? Is there something like
>CAP (Columbua AppleTalk Protocol?) for Windoze? (I've used it with Linux)
The closest thing to CAP for Windows would be PC-MACLAN from Miramar
systems (www.miramarsys.com). There is also, of course, Thursby's
Dave which whould give you Windows networking on the Mac.
If we're talking just printing, then you might want to look for one
of the old 'lpd' packages for the mac, though I'm not sure how the
Windows boxes would fit in.
Personally, I'd consider moving the LaserJet to a Linux box running
netatalk (like CAP, but nicer) and possibly also installing a
LocalTalk board. As an alternative to the LocalTalk card, use a
second system (LC III or IIsi) with a minimal system running Apple's
LocalTalk Bridge.
<<<john>>>
I second that :)
At 04:27 PM 3/27/01 -0500, you wrote:
>On Tue, 27 Mar 2001, Curt Vendel wrote:
>
> > Hi Guys,
> >
> > Arrangements are set for me to drive down Sunday to pick up the
> equipment, I
> > will start working on the list of who has asked for what and post it
> here in the
> > mailinglist, the stuff is getting spoken for quickly, up to about 15
> people have
> > asked for 1 workstation each, a few asked for 2. I will post where
> we are at
> > sometime late tonight.
> >
> >
> > Curt
>
>Hi Curt,
>
>Is it too late for me to put in a request for a workstation?
>
>Thanks,
>
>greg
>
>Gregory Travis
>Cornerstone Information Systems ATS
>greg(a)ciswired.com
>812 330 4361 ext. 18