Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 13:53:09 -0400
From: Sridhar Ayengar <ploopster at gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Free MCA stuff
To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
<cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Message-ID: <49CA6F85.6020807 at gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Liam Proven wrote:
> By the way, if this is not the place, do let me know. Peter Wendt's
> MCA site seems to have gone & I don't know any other points for MCA
> collectors or fans - but if anyone does, do please let me know!
There are indeed MCA collectors on this list.
Peace... Sridhar
---------------------------------------
Also lots of them on Vintage-Computers:
http://www.vintage-computer.com/vcforum/index.phphttp://marketplace.vintage-computer.com/
Got some manuals recently:
- Technical User Manual for Beehive DM5 Family of Video Display Terminals
Looks interesting, although I've never seen one in person. An
interesting feature is that it provides an escape sequence to download
8085 binary code directly into the terminal (as ASCII hex digit
sequences). I'm wondering what it would take to load a space invaders
game into it :-).
Has anyone ever seen a Beehive DM5 display terminal?
- Service Manual for Teletype Model 43 teleprinter
Parts list, schematics, troubleshooting procedures, mechanical
assembly drawings, etc. Basically, this is everything you ever needed
for the Model 43 Teletype. If someone needs this scanned in order to
diagnose a problem, let me know.
--
"The Direct3D Graphics Pipeline" -- DirectX 9 draft available for download
<http://www.xmission.com/~legalize/book/download/index.html>
Legalize Adulthood! <http://blogs.xmission.com/legalize/>
>> NOTIS-BG User Guide
>> NOTIS-RG New functions in the E-version
> ...
>
> Hello Bert, are these still available?
Yes, everything from that list is still available.
Hi all,
I have a non-working Cyper 100 tape drive which I am
going to dump. Before doing that, I offer any part of
the drive for the cost of shipping (from The Netherlands).
You can see the drive in the picture in the second row,
at the right-hand side. It's the tape drive on the left
above the PDP-11/55. (On the right side is the TU45):
www.pdp-11.nl/pdp11-55/pdp11-55startpage.html
Shipping the complete drive is too expensive, but if
you need the transformer or the (big) logic board, or
whatever, I am willing to disassemble it for you.
I hate to throw it away but I need the space for DEC
stuff, so on request I will even take a few pictures,
if requested.
If I have not had a reply within a week,
the complete drive will be "old iron".
- Henk.
In emptying the warehouse of Zebra Systems, we uncovered the original
Betamax tapes of these two shows.
I posted them on YouTube for your enjoyment.
We also uncovered a load of books, tapes, and some TS-1000/1500/ZX-81
Hardware.
We even found about 5 TS-1500 Computers that we'll be offering on eBay.
But for now, enjoy these:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GtDG5cWmH8shttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=awUonjY_jcs
Al Hartman
take a look at this...
http://www.sbprojects.com/projects/8049spy/8049spy.htm
best regards, Steve Thatcher
-----Original Message-----
>From: Alexandre Souza <alexandre-listas at e-secure.com.br>
>Sent: May 5, 2009 5:02 PM
>To: "General Discussion: On-Topic Posts Only" <cctech at classiccmp.org>
>Subject: Extracting a 8049 (ROM) program
>
>
> Dear friends,
>
> Anyone has a clue of how to extract a 8049 program?
>
> This is for a Kenwood TS-430 radio. It uses a 8049 for entire rig
>control, but got one fried. It would help a lot if I could extract a program
>from a known good TS-430 and program a 8749 with that.
>
> Thanks
> Alexandre
>
Hi,
An article (and video) featuring Paul Qureshi about his hacking of a Dreamcast Arcade controller, an old Atari Joystick, and an old Pacman arcade motherboard.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/8024182.stm
Regards,
Andrew B
aliensrcooluk at yahoo.co.uk
Christian Corti wrote:
> On Sat, 2 May 2009, Tim Shoppa wrote:
>> I just noticed that the total size of the Bitsavers archive seems
>> to have surpassed 100 Gigabytes in the past few days.
> No it hasn't ;-) The current total size of Bitsavers (everything including
> bits and pdf) is 96 GB on a ZFS "partition".
Maybe I did not make myself clear enough. When I wrote
100 Gigabytes, I meant 10**11 bytes, because as I see the archive with
rsync there are 100461300404 bytes in it. Certainly when I made the other
calculations I used 10**11 bytes.
I did not mean 10**8 * 2**10 bytes.
I did not mean 10**5 * 2**20 bytes.
I did not mean 10**2 * 2**30 bytes.
I suspect your 96 GB is 96 * 10**3 * 2**20 bytes, i.e. what you call
a GB is actually what a SI-sensitive person would call a KiloMebibyte.
Tim.
All,
Thanks to the kindness of Richard Lynch, I now have the 8" drive cabinet
to go with my newly-repaired Xerox 820-II. The drive mechanisms were
non-functional, unfortunately, so I need to scrounge together something
>from my junk, err parts collection.
I cannot find anything definitive regarding compatibility. I thought
these machines could use DSDD drives (one site mentioned Shugart SA851s),
but that would be 1.2M of capacity and everything I've found on the web
indicates perhaps 1/2 of that.
Can anyone tell me what will work with the unit and what low-level format
it writes?
Steve
--
[snip]
>
> Hi! The S-100 backplane PCBs have arrived. Please contact me if
> interested in getting one. Thanks and have a nice day!
>
> Andrew Lynch
[AJL>]
Hi! I updated the N8VEM wiki with some pictures of the S-100 PCB and
construction so far.
http://n8vem-sbc.pbworks.com/browse/#view=ViewFolder¶m=S100
I've partially built one of the units for testing. I've gone as far as I can
go but some parts are on back order. What is missing is the power connector
(0.200" spaced headers male). My plan is to finish assembly and test the
active terminator section before installing the S-100 connectors.
Some people have been concerned about availability of the S-100 connectors
but they are plentiful and relatively cheap. At Mouser you can get EDAC
parts which should work for $5 each. You can also substitute wire wrap
connectors which sometimes can be found on eBay for $3 each. I test
installed but did not solder some wire wrap S-100 connectors and they should
work just fine.
Thanks and have a nice day!
Andrew Lynch
>
>Subject: Re: Transistors...
> From: "bfranchuk at jetnet.ab.ca" <bfranchuk at jetnet.ab.ca>
> Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 18:07:20 -0600
> To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
>
>Scanning wrote:
>> A friggin piece of wire has a gain of 1 !!!!
>umm .999999 :)
>> / steven
>
Voltage gain, Current gain, or power gain?
Common base transistor has current gain of .99999.. and voltage gain >1 as
well as power gain. Wire is .9999999.. for all those.
Allison
[snip]
>
> Thanks and have a nice day!
>
> Andrew Lynch
Great pictures! (Once I figured out that I had to use IE vs. Firefox.) I
had forgotten how huge those connectors are. It has been a very long time
since I worked on the unit that our personal computer club at Recognition
Equipment put together...
Charlie Carothers
--
-----REPLY-----
Hi! Thanks! My hope is that this S-100 backplane will be a successful
project and make available a tool that S-100 hobbyists can use to develop
new peripherals and/or test and repair the ones they already have. The
ideal persons for this prototype phase would be those with experience in
building home brew S-100 systems and can identify and resolve issues with
the backplane, suggest improvements, etc.
There is very little S-100 development going on anymore so there appears to
be a dearth of tools available such as backplanes, prototyping boards, power
supplies, etc. Some new parts are needed, I think, for even the most basic
repairs without using the legacy systems.
Thanks and have a nice day!
Andrew Lynch
I'm attempting a painful task of extracting logic from an image of a
NMOS die manufactured in 1984. Initially, I'm only going after a small
portion of logic from the chip. I have a block diagram which appears to
roughly match the chip layout, a pinout, and an overall description of
the logic.
I have very little clue what I'm actually doing, but I'm trying to fix
that. :)
I'd like to develop a library of images of NMOS logic cells -- and
perhaps using pattern matching later, try to automate the process.
Does anyone here happen to know this stuff well enough to say, "there's
a NOR", "there's an OR", "that's an inverter." etc?
Anyone know the types of books I should be looking at to get this type
of information? NMOS Chip fabrication? Much of what I've found talks
about the actual process, but they normally show side-views of layers.
I'm looking down on the chip through a few layers and need stuff from
that perspective.
I have a couple example shots here
http://www.techtravels.org/snippet.jpghttp://www.techtravels.org/snippet2.jpg
Keith
P.S. Yes, I know, I'm crazy.
>>
>> To answer the question of why you'd want easy to use software, that
>> push
>> really does come from the corporate world. My favorite example for
>> this
>
> My entire post was about differentiating "easy to use" v "easy to
> learn".
> The corporate push is for "easy to learn", since they don't want a
> training expense for the digital sweatshop.
> Apple's marketing pushes "easy to learn" while calling it "easy to
> use".
> "Easy to use" and "easy to learn" may occasionally overlap, but are
> NOT
> the same for those who are capable of learning.
>
> Conflation of the two phrases is detrimental to the well being of our
> species.
I agree with the confusion being bad. I do not agree with the rest.
Ease of learning is important if you only want to use a program a
couple of times. Ideally you do not want to learn anything, you want
to get a job done and move on and not have irrelevant facts hanging
around in your head for ever-more. Where the Mac UI really used to
score over DOS and old Windows programs is that you learned a
technique which would be valid in every Mac program you would ever
come across, and so was worth learning. It did not matter if the
application was word processing, CAD, 3D, spreadsheet, drawing,
painting, photo retouching, page layout, music composing, video
editing, disk utility or whatever, the techniques were the same.
I find it very hard to get users to read a manual these days. If
facilities are not visible they do not find them. I know most,
probably all, of the people on this list are not manual avoiders but
we are a small minority, to write application software today which
could only be used after reading a manual would almost be commercial
suicide. Quite a few of my users remark that it is so rare to have a
printed manual available these days (we mail it out to users who pay a
small amount for it). We sell mainly via download and also have a
physical product we sell through the Apple stores and elsewhere, but
it has to be a standardised box to fit their shelves, and the box is
too small to fit the printed manual in.
For programs to be used long term I think that user configurability is
the key. There is no point hiding facilities as it makes learning
harder in the first place but once users become experienced they will
know which facilities they use most and can assign them short cuts.
The software designer should not make permanent choices on these,
though an educated guess which can be overridden can save time. There
does need to be a host of features but without impeding ease of
learning, this can be very tricky and itself takes years of experience
by the designer.
Not that my opinion is worth any more than anyone else's.
Roger Holmes.
I just noticed that the total size of the Bitsavers archive seems
to have surpassed 100 Gigabytes in the past few days.
In historical storage units, that is 160000 miles, nearly one light
second, of paper tape.
That is 1.25 Billion punched cards. At about 143 cards to the inch,
those punced cards would make a stack 137 miles high. Production of that
many cards would require three major deciduous forests, which by my exchange
table is also the same as one ship's peanut.
That is 40000 RK05 carts. At about 10 pounds per cart, that's almost half
a million pounds of RK05's.
Great job, Al!
Tim.
>Message: 12
>Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 12:56:29 -0400
>From: "Steve Robertson" < steerex at ccvn.com >
>Subject: FS: HP keyboards
>Yo,
>I've got some original HP keyboards that need a new home. The models are as follows:
<snip>
>I'd like to get a couple of dollars ($10) each plus shipping if anyone is interested?
>They are located in western North Carolina.
>See ya,
>Steve Robertson
Since you want a couple of dollars each, the $10 must be in binary. :)
Bob
> From: Ethan Dicks <ethan.dicks at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: Chips that changed the world
>> Then of course there were those programmers that thought they were
>> clever, using the top 8 bits to store flags in pointers, etc. ?
>> Royally
>> messed up when upgrading to 68020 and up.
>
> I remember reading a warning against such practices the original Mac
> system manuals (the "hernia manuals"), but faced with 128K of RAM,
> early programmers did not universally heed the warning.
As I remember it, the warning was there because Apple had already used
the top eight bits of pointers to hold flags for locked, resource,
purge-able etc and if you wrote over them the OS crashed or made your
application crash when it overwrote your flags. A big chunk of one the
developer conference was going 32 bit clean, whereby developers had to
use system routines to test and set the flags instead of system macros
which had been compiled into our source code without us realising they
were macros. For instance it was normal to get the status byte of a
handle before locking it and instead of unlocking it, restore the
status byte. As these had been done using macros they just went
straight to the master pointer and acted on its top 8 bits. There were
also system calls or macros for extracting the lower 24 bits which
very few people had used as it worked without, but Apple wanted us to
use them so they could redefine them to do nothing later. Saving a few
bytes caused both Apple and its developers a huge amount of effort
later on.
Incidentally, you refer to the "hernia manuals". Do you mean the ring
bounds ones? At least you could split them up, volume 5 was the
problem one, it was a paperback about 2" x 8.5" x 11". Later there was
a volume about OCE (IIRC, Open Connectivity Environment) which was as
bad if not worse, but at least I never needed to read it, I think that
technology died because the application programmers were intimidated
by the size of the manual.
Does anyone here happen to have a copy of the original loose leaf
QuickDraw 3D manuals? Someone chucked out my copy at work thinking
they had been supeceeded, but they were far better than the later
documentation and still apply to the Quesa open source project I use
in my work. I would be willing to pay for them to be copied or
scanned, maybe they could go on BitSavers or be put in the official
Quesa documentation at SourceForge.
Roger Holmes.
Enough people are asking about the P112 that I think I can justify
taking preorders. I don't know exactly how much it'll cost for this
run, but I'm fairly sure it'll be decently similar to how it was last
time, which was US$165. I'll have the parts costs calculated out in a
couple days. Then I'll know how many preorders will be needed to get
things rolling. Stand by for more info.
I anticipate three visible changes in the kit.
1) Depending on how many 32k chips I have left, I may go ahead and make 1M
modules of the sort that Terry made up a while ago. 512k chips in DIP
packages is very expensive, but for SMT packages, it's very cheap. The 1M
module is nothing more than a daughterboard that plugs into the P112 and
behaves exactly like a pair of DIPs.
2) Add two holes near the RTC crystal. I think it would be cleaner to
use a loop of wire to hold the crystal down instead of a blob of epoxy.
3) Change the battery holder to something more compatible with add-on
boards.
--
David Griffith
dgriffi at cs.csubak.edu
A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
> I've never heard of the "Swift board for the Apple II". Googling
> didn't turn up anything useful, although maybe I just didn't use the
> right incantation.
Try "SwyftCard".
It's interesting to see how the concepts that were swimming around
in Jef Raskin's head turned up and around into realizations in the 80's.
Tim.
The PCjr Speech Adapter sidecar is rumored to be identical to the PS/2
version, at least as far as the BIOS support on the adapter goes.
I'd like to play around with mine, but the only programming notes I can
find are in BASIC using some assembler hidden in some DATA statements.
If I get really desperate I can extract the relevant code from the DATA
statements, but I'm hoping somebody has the tech ref.
Thanks,
Mike
> I just noticed that the total size of the Bitsavers archive seems
> to have surpassed 100 Gigabytes in the past few days.
>
> In historical storage units, that is 160000 miles, nearly one light
> second, of paper tape.
Hmm, how big/high would the pile of chad be?
>
> That is 1.25 Billion punched cards. At about 143 cards to the inch,
> those punced cards would make a stack 137 miles high. Production of that
> many cards would require three major deciduous forests, which by my
> exchange
> table is also the same as one ship's peanut.
>
> That is 40000 RK05 carts. At about 10 pounds per cart, that's almost half
> a million pounds of RK05's.
>
> Great job, Al!
>
> Tim.
>
--
Certified : VCP 3.x, SCSI 3.x SCSA S10, SCNA S10
This is a very long shot (but it's on topic), so here goes.
I have some of those Sony full-height single-sided (single head) 600rpm
3.5" floppy drives -- the ones that are used in the HP9121, HP9133V,
early Apricot PCs, etc.
Now, on the main board of these drives is a little ferrite-cored
transformer. This is the only drive I've ever worked on that doesn't have
a centre-tapped read-write head, and this transformer frovides a balanced
signal into the read amplifier chain. It's surrounded by transistors that
are involved in the read/write switching (this is not done with diodes as
is conventional).
Unfortunately, I've mechanically damaged (read 'ripped it off the PCB')
this trnasformer in one drive of one of my HP9121s (long story...). So I
need to do somehtign about it. I can't find a 'spare' single-head drive
in my junk box, and I can't get a double-head one to work in the 9121
(this may be because the double-head drive I found has a fault, I've not
seriously tested it). I can't use parts of the double head drive to
repair the single-head one, the double head drive is conventional with a
centre-tapped head, diode switching and no transformer.
So what I am looking for is :
A new transformer (no chance!).
A working or defective-somwehre-else logic PCB (it's labelled 'FC-6' in
the silk-screen). No I am not going to try to desolder the transformer
>from it (the thing is _very_ fragile), but I could, say, take the
microcontroller off my existing PCB if necessary
Such a floppy drive with a fault other than in the transformer.
Winding details (yes, I am prepared to have go at making one...)
And while I'm on the subject, did anyone ever do serious repairs to such
drives and have the special tools (compliance-testing weight, alighment
pinion driver, etc). I have a load of quesitons on those...
-tony
Ahh but Jules,
We know something you dont know !! ... ner ner ...
Watch this space for some good news regarding the museum
(apart from addition of an SGI Origin 2000 obviously)
We had a great time and the Gadget Show Live a few weeks ago
See : http://www.computinghistory.org.uk/news/4058/Gadget-Show-Live-2009-Awesome/
which has helped gain us some much needed support ...
Anyway, does anyone know where I can get signed drivers for Windows Vista that
support the Origin 2000?
:-)
Jason
Curator & Chief Geek
The Centre for Computing History
-----Original Message-----
From: jules.richardson99 at gmail.com
Sent: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 16:42:05 -0500
To: cctalk at classiccmp.org
Subject: Re: free/pick-up: Origin 2000 sgi 2400, Tilburg, The Netherlands
Joost van de Griek wrote:
> On Apr 29, 2009, at 20:29, Joost van Baal wrote:
>
>> The machine will be rescued by the Centre for Computing History
>> (www.computinghistory.org.uk) near Cambridge, UK. (It might even get
>> hooked up
>> on the internet, within a couple of months.) Thanks locutus for help in
>> mediating. See http://abramowitz.uvt.nl/sgi.txt for latest status.
Knowing that museum, I'm wondering where they're going to put it ;-) (I also
believe it'll be well looked after, which is good news)
cheers
Jules
home brew S-100 backplane project
Doug Jackson doug at stillhq.com
Hi Andrew,
Could you please put me down for one.
I am in Australia, so that has to be factored into the postage.
thanks
Doug
-----REPLY-----
Hi! Thanks Doug! I will do that. Shipping overseas would be $5 per PCB.
Please contact me offlist so we can discuss further.
Two of the eight PCBs available for the initial round of testing are already
claimed.
I will post pictures of the PCBs and my build progress on the wiki.
Thanks and have a nice day!
Andrew Lynch
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrew Lynch [mailto:lynchaj at yahoo.com]
> Sent: Sunday, April 19, 2009 2:29 PM
> To: 'cctalk at classiccmp.org'
> Subject: RE: home brew S-100 backplane project
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Andrew Lynch [mailto:lynchaj at yahoo.com]
> > Sent: Friday, April 17, 2009 10:29 AM
> > To: 'cctalk at classiccmp.org'
> > Subject: home brew S-100 backplane project
> >
> > Hi!? I've been working on a home brew S-100 backplane as a side project
> [snip]
>
> Hi! The experimental prototype S-100 backplanes will be available in
> about 3 weeks. They will cost $32 each plus shipping which should be $2
> in the US and $5 overseas. All the parts are common and available from
> the usual suppliers such as Mouser, Digikey, etc.
>
> Thanks and have a nice day!
>
> Andrew Lynch
[AJL>]
Hi! The S-100 backplane PCBs have arrived. Please contact me if interested
in getting one. Thanks and have a nice day!
Andrew Lynch
Yo,
I've got some original HP keyboards that need a new home. The models are as follows:
46011A (qty 2)
46010A
C1400A
All of them are in excellent cosmetic condition but, the operational condition is unknown. I've had them for many years and they were all working when they were last connected to working system(s).
IIRC, they work with HP dumb terminals and are generally not interchangable. You'd have to do some searching to find out if they would work in your situation..
I'd like to get a couple of dollars ($10) each plus shipping if anyone is interested? They are located in western North Carolina.
See ya,
Steve Robertson
steerex [at] ccvn [dot] com
Hi
Is there anybody out there who has or knows where I can get a MSV11-J
(M8637-E(E OR F)) ?
I may be able to get my pdp11/94 running as an 11/84 if I can get a PMI
card.
Rod Smallwood
As an unexpected freebie while I was picking up another pdp8 I've acquired a
small pdp11/15. I'm really an 8-man so this is a bit of a foreigner but it
seemed a shame to let it be thrown away.
It seems to be a fairly small system in a single box but beautifully clean
for a change ;o). The configuration sheet shows KC11, KF11-A, DL11, KG11-A,
MM11-F, MM11-f, DD11-A and H720F which seems to reflect the contents OK.
I've started browsing around but I'd welcome anyone giving me a rundown on
what these modules build up to.
I was quite interested to see the construction method with the cards
upside-down in the backplane and a snazzy rotatable rack mount for servicing
- unusual (to me at least).
Bob
Hi folks,
My aunt just emailed me to let me know she's got a friend with some
old floppies that she needs to get files off of.
They're Amsoft CF2 3" floppies, unfortunately something I've never had
in my collection, so I can't really help. If anyone on the list has
easy access to an Amstrad or ZX Spectrum system with a CF2 drive and
would be willing to help (possibly for a fee, I have no idea
whether/what they'd be willing to pay), please contact me off list,
and I'll try to get you connected!
Thanks,
-Seth
Mike asks:
> My real question is - 9 faulty out of 48, spread across both machines,
> seems very high. Are 4116s that unreliable? Or perhaps they're quite
> sensitive to power supply problems?
It isn't unusual to find that many years after manufacture, that a
particular batch of DRAM chips aren't reliable anymore.
DEC and other memory board makers used to keep internal lists
of known good batches and known bad batches of chips, and even
kept track of what brand/batch are shipped with each memory board
for long-term reliability tracking.
But it seems more likely that something marginal in the timing of the
motherboards or the power supply or something else is causing your
observed flakiness.
I don't really understand what you mean about the Apple II's "wouldn't
boot", though. They do not do an extensive (or any!) power-on memory test
but maybe loading DOS 3.3 is hitting RAM hard enough at power on
that it's turning somethng else up. As others have noted, just going
into BASIC at power-up doesn't hit memory too hard, and the quickie
tests of going into hi-res graphics and looking for flakiness on the screen
is useful if not definitive.
Tim.
Hi,
I just try to get a VT05 working with my PDP-8/e.
Having a tuned KL8E interface at 2400 baud.
I need fill characters....
Found a KL8E.PA in the OS/8 V3D sources. It is a two page handler and works.
But how do I get my system to use it as terminal handler? Or is there another one?
Best wishes,
Philipp :-)
--
http://www.hachti.de
First sorry for the delayed response.
Back when the Apple ][ Europlus were being sold new, and when
Microspot was actively selling them, one of my favourite ways of
finding RAM problems, was to type HGR2<return> and watch the screen.
It switched to displaying a large chunk of the second 16k bank as pure
raster graphics and then sets it all to black (zero). It only displays
seven bits of each byte on a mono monitor but any dead chips in those
seven shows up as recurring white (or randomly flashing) vertical
lines. If there is a fault in the first bank then the machine probably
will not start up, but if it does, typing HGR<return> displays the
first bank similarly but with four(?) lines of text at the bottom.
You can switch the RAM around to test bank 3 and the eighth bit of
each byte. By using the Basic commands (moveto and lineto?) you can
find out which bit has failed, or by switching RAM chips.
On 26 Apr 2009, at 18:00, cctalk-request at classiccmp.org wrote:
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2009 23:38:28 +1200
> From: Mike van Bokhoven <mike at fenz.net>
> Subject: More broken Apples...
> To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
> <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
> Message-ID: <49F447B4.1000708 at fenz.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> Well, I dragged those Apple IIs out of storage, and spent this evening
> poking at them, with some success. Thought I'd post my results here,
> and
> hope that someone has some suggestions for me.
>
> There are three machines in total; one an Apple II Europlus, the other
> two generic II+ clones.
>
> The first thing I did was run them up - all dead, garbage on the
> screen.
> Same as last time I looked at them. Step 2 - pull all the cards and
> try
> again. After that, one of the clones ran up fine; turns out that the
> 'language card' (16k memory expansion) was killing it. Good stuff -
> one
> running Apple II, even if it's not an original.
>
> Unfortunately, the other two weren't quite so cooperative. I decided
> to
> look at the other clone first, as its behaviour was pretty
> interesting.
> The screen was entirely full of apostrophes to begin with, but
> randomly,
> blocks of them would change to lower case 'p's, and back, flickering
> very quickly. It responded to a reset by changing the pattern of ps,
> though they tended to appear in the same place. I found the ASCII
> values
> interesting:
>
> ' = 0x60 = 0110 0000
> p = 0x70 = 0111 0000
>
> So, on reset, perhaps it's clearing half the bits per byte, and the
> other four have a problem. Reseting the machine tended to lead to
> random
> behaviour for a bit, such as random display changes, and speaker
> clicks.
> At one point, the display switched to high-res mode, and I could see
> that a large amount of memory had the same sort of pattern through it,
> and was flickering the same way text was; I guess the entire memory
> space is like that. Perhaps bits 5 and 6 are permanently stuck.
>
> I checked the CPU's behaviour; on reset, the address and data lines
> would run for at least a short time, so I'm guessing the CPU is likely
> to be OK. Often they would continue to run, at which time I'd see the
> flickering. Other times, activity would stop, and the flickering would
> also stop, usually leaving a screen full of 's.
>
> So, my next step is to track down a schematic for the machine, and see
> what I can figure out. I'm guessing I should look first at anything
> that
> deals with the high four bits of memory. Thoughts, suggestions and
> intuitive guesses welcome!
On Wed, 29 Apr 2009 15:33:43 -0600, Richard <legalize at xmission.com>
wrote:
> Reasonable idea. I've seen surplus environment controlled trailers
> for sale on govliquidation.
This is a great way of going if you are willing to re-rack your
equipment. The electronics trailers are specially designed to channel
cooling to the racks - some having zone controls. Generally, there is
also sufficient power distribution to handle the equipment you
described.
A number of years ago I outfitted a thirty-foot surplus equipment
trailer with a Modcomp II, data recorders, printer, and data
acquisition equipment for an atmospheric optical transfer function
experiment. The trailer I came up with had a row of racks that
covered one side leaving the other for a console and printer and room
for everyone involved to escape the elements. We operated out of
Tucson, Arizona with sites at Cape Canaveral in the summer, Lake Tahoe
in the winter, and Bolder, Colorado in the summer. About 10,000 miles
of travel in all with no equipment failures!
There were two zones of cooling: one for the equipment in the bays and
the other for the personnel space. There was over 100 Amps available
in the racks with 3-phase 220/110V wiring.
Another avenue to investigate are surplus equipment shelters. These
shelters have environmental systems, racks, and power distribution.
You hire a crane/big fork lift and a flatbed to move the beasts and
generally will go for less than the trailers.
CRC
>
>Subject: Re: Transistors...
> From: Fred Cisin <cisin at xenosoft.com>
> Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 11:50:48 -0700 (PDT)
> To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts" <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
>
>On Tue, 28 Apr 2009, Allison wrote:
>> Common base transistor has current gain of .99999.. and voltage gain >1 as
>> well as power gain. Wire is .9999999.. for all those.
>
>Is common wire really THAT close (.9999999..) to 1.0?
>I always assumed that wire losses were more than that.
>Or does that require superconductors?
Not quite but compared to many other things unless second order effects
are important it's practical to use 1. Mostly as what you put in is
what out get out for small systems at low curents and moderatly low
frequencies. At grid tranmission line currents and distances even
that .000001 part is significant.
At RF, noticable at VHF and higher then the resistivity of the surface
is more important than bulk due to skin effect.
Thats a whole nother can of worms.
Allison
On Apr 29, 2009, at 20:29, Joost van Baal wrote:
> The machine will be rescued by the Centre for Computing History
> (www.computinghistory.org.uk) near Cambridge, UK. (It might even
> get hooked up
> on the internet, within a couple of months.) Thanks locutus for
> help in
> mediating. See http://abramowitz.uvt.nl/sgi.txt for latest status.
Joost asked me to communicate this to all of you, so here it is.
.tsooJ
It's for free or cost of shipping and living in Aberdeen, so if any one
wants it, contact :
<mailto:chas at cmac-sys.co.uk> chas at cmac-sys.co.uk
-Rik
Someone with more room to spare than I have, please rescue this machine!
Begin forwarded message:
> Resent-From: debian-mips at lists.debian.org
> From: Joost van Baal <joostvb+sgi at uvt.nl>
> Date: April 28, 2009 15:26:14 GMT+02:00
> To: debian-mips at lists.debian.org
> Subject: free/pick-up: Origin 2000 sgi 2400, Tilburg, The Netherlands
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Tilburg University in the Netherlands wants to get rid of an Origin
> 2000 sgi
> 2400. It consists of 3 cabinets of about 2 meters high; width about
> 22 inch.
> Out of the 4 panels present, 3 are still fully functional. Is has
> 48 GB RAM
> and 24 CPU's running at 200 MHz. It's free for anybody willing to
> arrange
> transportation. Please reply to joostvb+sgi at uvt.nl if you're
> interested (I am
> not subscribed to this list). If you plan to use the machine for
> Free Software
> work, you'll get a priority handling :)
>
> Bye,
>
> Joost
.tsooJ
--
I got kicked out of Barnes & Noble once for moving all the bibles into
the fiction section
--
Joost van de Griek
<http://www.jvdg.net/>
>
>Subject: RE: Ciarcia's Circuit Cellar
> From: "Andrew Lynch" <lynchaj at yahoo.com>
> Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 14:20:28 -0400
> To: <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
>
>We'll see what Steve has to say about it. I think he has those books for
>sale, doesn't he?
>
>I used to have my secretary xerox his columns (no, I didn't cut out of my
>Byte magazines, though that collection has long since been deep-sixed) but I
>don't know whether I still have those copies - probably "somewhere" but I'll
>be damned if I know where that "somewhere" is.
>
>I've built a number of Steve's projects. In my workshop a few days ago I saw
>his EEG project waiting to be revived.
>
>But there is so much to do....
>
>Vern Wright
>
>
>
>-----REPLY-----
>
>Hi! Steve and Sean generously released BYOZ80C to allow online publishing.
>I very much enjoyed his book and commend him for both writing it in the
>first place and also releasing it so as to help keep the home brew computing
>tradition alive.
>
>http://www.scribd.com/doc/13388965/Build-Your-Own-Z80-Computer
>
>You can see the full description of the release statement on the first page.
>
>Thanks and have a nice day!
>
>Andrew Lynch
Also a most useless site. Despite all claims of down loadable document
it plain doesnt do it. Sites like this have a habit of disappearing and
taking the content with it. Far too much stuff has gone lost over the
years.
Allison
At 12:00 -0500 4/28/09, Jonas wrote:
>Two diodes connected back to back will never be anything but two diodes
>connected back to back. No current gain *at all*.
Is 1.0 (as in, output current = base current times 1.0) a "gain"? I
suppose it's a legitimate value of hfe (I grant, it's not a useful
value).
--
- Mark 210-379-4635
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Large Asteroids headed toward planets
inhabited by beings that don't have
technology adequate to stop them:
Think of it as Evolution in Fast-Forward.
Hi,
Throw some ideas at me. I've got an old 4.5" B&W portable television which I
can use for something fun, such as a portable Pong game, portable TRS-80, or
whatever.
What would you like seen done with it? I'm all ears.
Alexis.
It looks like my this post from a few days ago vanished, so I'm
sending it again. My apologies if you get it twice.
I visited Mike Lee today and brought home an Apple iie and iigs.
(thanks mike) He and I were talking about lists of wanted hardware.
I think it might be useful for people to send around a list once a
month or some other interval listing what we're after and maybe what
we have to trade.
Maybe we can bring it to the meeting later this month. (is that still on?)
So I guess I'll start. :-)
Here's what I'm willing to trade:
A working amiga 2000 with a hard drive card and two floppy drives. I
can include a mouse, but not a keyboard.
I also have a Commodore 128D.
Here's what I'm after:
Commodore 64c with a 1541c, 1541-2, or 1571
A few dead (or alive) 1571s that I can hack
Amiga 500
Working Amiga 600 keyboard
Amiga 1200, dead ok.
CPU upgrades for the 2000 (040+) or any for the 1200
Really, any amiga peripheral or upgrade
A board that would allow some sort of hard drive on the iie and iigs,
so if you have something like a vulcan or scsi controller lying
around... :-)
Internal scsi devices that aren't fixed disks or tape drives, so
things like zip or jaz drives, etc.
An NEC Multisync 3D monitor
A clean IBM 5150 case I can hack
A clean IBM 5170 case I can hack
3.5" and 5.25" double density floppies I can feed to the catweasel
One of those 200-400 disk dvd changers
A smallish audio mixing board
Here's one that sold on eBay recently:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=160322759943
Look familiar?
--Chuck
-----REPLY-----
Hi! Thanks Chuck! Yes, the PCB pictured is almost exactly the same as
mine.
Mystery Solved! Thanks! Have a nice day!
Andrew Lynch
I'd love this just for the url. But it's better than that. Edible circuits!
Combining two of my best things.
http://www.evilmadscientist.com/article.php/circuitsnacks
-----
454. [Humor] I played a blank tape on full volume. The mime who lived next
door
complained. So I shot him with a gun with a silencer. --Steven Wright
--... ...-- -.. . -. ----. --.- --.- -...
tpeters at nospam.mixcom.com (remove "nospam") N9QQB (amateur radio)
"HEY YOU" (loud shouting) WEB: http://www.mixweb.com/tpeters
43? 7' 17.2" N by 88? 6' 28.9" W, Elevation 815', Grid Square EN53wc
WAN/LAN/Telcom Analyst, Tech Writer, MCP, CCNA, Registered Linux User 385531
OR,
It IS possible, looking at the release statement (inserted below) in the .pdf, that scribdb and Andrew Lynch and Bill Bradford may have an interest in where the book is hosted.
Dunno.
Vern Wright
"A Note about this book and its free availability online
Readers are encouraged to download this book of design guidelines and application notes from Steve
Ciarcia, founder and editorial director of Circuit Cellar magazine. Although the original title first
appeared in 1981, pre-dating Circuit Cellar ?the magazine,? I still get a number of purchase requests
each year from electronics enthusiasts. Some are just interested in Steve?s brand of designing and ability
to overcome obstacles, while others still find themselves tweaking projects that use parts described in
Steve?s projects.
Please note: The original work was only available as a hard copy. Thanks to Andrew Lynch and Bill
Bradford for their work in creating the PDF and getting permission from copyright holder Steve Ciarcia
to release it. Scanning done by Bill Bradford.
You will be pleased to know that the same style of embedded computing articles can be found each
month through Circuit Cellar magazine. Please visit www.circuitcellar.com to learn about this monthly
resource for professional designers and electronics enthusiasts alike.
Please enjoy ?Build Your Own Z80 Computer? as a great blast from the past. Its style is the foundation
on which Circuit Cellar magazine was built and continues to grow. I look forward to seeing you become a
part of the ongoing Circuit Cellar success story.
Sincerely,
Sean Donnelly, Publisher ? Circuit Cellar
circuitcellar at circuitcellar.com"
First thing, this is not my machine, but someone i know who asked me
to post this.
--
Tilburg University in the Netherlands wants to get rid of an Origin 2000 sgi
2400. It consists of 3 cabinets of about 2 meters high; width about 22 inch.
Out of the 4 panels present, 3 are still fully functional. Is has 48 GB RAM
and 24 CPU's running at 200 MHz. It's free for anybody willing to arrange
transportation. Please reply to joostvb+sgi at uvt.nl if you're interested. If
you plan to use the machine for Free Software work, you'll get a priority
handling :)
Here's a picture of what these things look like:
http://db313.ath.cx/~sp/auctions/SGI-O2000_main_large.jpg
And here's a description of such a machine:
http://cgi.ebay.com/Silicon-Graphics-SGI-Origin-2000-Full-Rack-Server-Runs!…
3 racks, each of them is _probably_ :
Width Height Depth Weight
71 cm 185 cm 102 cm 317 kg
(28 inches) (73 inches) (40 inches) (700 lb)
The racks have once been lifted by 6 strong man.
--Joost van Baal,
2009-04-28
---------------
I think it allmost falls within the 10 year rule ;-) (origin's started
shipping in what, 97?)
on Tue Apr 28 13:36:34 CDT 2009 silvercreekvalley wrote:
...
> server - ie something around 400MHz clock speed. Anyone
> have anything available in the UK that they would like
> to get rid of? Its for testing performance on low
> end systems.
Wow ... 400MHz ... I'm not sure any of my classic computers are that
fast. I have lots of 75-80MHz ones and a few 750KHz ones, but sorry
nothing above 100MHz
:-)
I could do with an older PC compatible rack mountable
server - ie something around 400MHz clock speed. Anyone
have anything available in the UK that they would like
to get rid of? Its for testing performance on low
end systems.
Ian.
>
>Subject: Re: Ciarcia's Circuit Cellar
> From: Ethan Dicks <ethan.dicks at gmail.com>
> Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2009 11:07:38 -0400
> To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts" <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
>
>On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 4:44 PM, Allison <ajp166 at bellatlantic.net> wrote:
>>>Hi! ?Steve and Sean generously released BYOZ80C to allow online publishing.
>>>I very much enjoyed his book and commend him for both writing it in the
>>>first place and also releasing it so as to help keep the home brew computing
>>>tradition alive.
>>>
>>>http://www.scribd.com/doc/13388965/Build-Your-Own-Z80-Computer
>>
>> Also a most useless site. ?Despite all claims of down loadable document
>> it plain doesnt do it.
>
>I had no problem with a Mac and Firefox getting a PDF to download.
I went to the mac using safari and that worked. Firfox on the NT4 box,
Ubuntu8.04 and even Ubuntu 9.04 however clicking the down load button
was a do nothing from Firefox.
>> Sites like this have a habit of disappearing and
>> taking the content with it. Far too much stuff has gone lost over the
>> years.
>
>Too true.
I have a massive abount of stuff I've downloaded form locations like that
(also oak.oakland, Simtel and ..) and when I send people to the location
it's not there anymore so it's fortunate I have the downloaded image.
The nastiest things is a the cases where Geocities was consumed and material
lost and later AOL hometown. the best example si try to find P2DOS, used to
be on simtel and Oakland to name a few now mostly dead links or not at all.
Allison
Hi,
My Zilog S8000 Winchester Controller board carries 2 ceramic DIL16
packaged chips labeled (beside a logo) just with the two lines of text.
The chip looks like this (tried to ASCII-art the logo in front of the
text)
+----------------------------------------+
| +-------+ |
| |----- | |
\ | > ----| 6306-1J |
/ |----- | 8147 |
| | > ----| |
| +-------+ |
+----------------------------------------+
I guess the 2nd line means:
81 == 1981
47 == calendar week 47
So I wonder what 6306-1J stands for? I've not analyzed the circuit to see
if it is a PROM or something like that. It is put in a socket so I guess
it must be something (onetime?) programmable...
Maybe you can tell...
--
Oliver Lehmann
http://www.pofo.de/http://wishlist.ans-netz.de/
On 4/26/2009, ard at p850ug1.demon.co.uk (Tony Duell) wrote:
>
>Message: 1
>Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 19:27:20 +0100 (BST)
>From: ard at p850ug1.demon.co.uk (Tony Duell)
>Subject: Re: Transistors...
>To: cctalk at classiccmp.org
>Message-ID: <m1Lxmay-000J3RC at p850ug1>
>Content-Type: text/plain
>
>> > If you wire two diodes in series (PN->NP), it isn't the same as a
>> > transistor (PNP), at all.
>>
>> It is. A PNP is just the same thing as a PN-+-NP.
>
>In one sense it is, but I can assure you that if you connect 2 diodes
>together in this way (no matter what sort of diodes you use), you will
>not get a transistor. The resulting circuit will not show any current gain.
>
>IIRC, what you need is a sufficiently thin base region (the 'N' in the
>example you gave) that electron-hole recombination does not occur. You
>can't join 2 n-type pieces with a bit of wire and get this.
>
>> possible space wise anyway, not even considering characteristics. But
>> that don't change the fact that you get a working transistor with just
>> two diodes.
>
Excuse the bluntness, but that is utter and complete bollocks. You do
*not* get a transistor with two diodes. Tony's comment above is
correct, for a transistor to work, the base needs to be thin enough that
electron-hole recombination does not occur (to any significant degree at
least).
Two diodes connected back to back will never be anything but two diodes
connected back to back. No current gain *at all*.
>I am not convinces. If you have got this to work, can you please tell me
>what sort of diodes you used, and I will try to recreate it (if I see it
>working on my bench, I'll be convinced!)
>
>-tony
>
/Jonas
Hi! I recently obtained a "mystery" IBM PC board. It has a Z80 CPU, two
CTCs, 8K of SRAM, and a bunch of 74LS logic. I *suspect* this board is one
of those VCR backup boards from the early 1980's.
The only text on the board is described by its previous owner on
Vintage-Computer.com forums:
QUOTE
i don't think the EGA cards used a Z80bCPU chip or a 12mhz crystal...
i did find some numbers on the card...
Audio Visual Laboratories, Inc.
27122 R0I
M14A 94V0
Serial Number 1518
i know i looks like an EGA card, but it doesn't even try to initialize a
monitor on the rca jacks or the 9-pin port...
UNQUOTE
The ROM (AM27S29PC, 512x8 bipolar PROM) has a label that says "GENESIS
7-11-84"
I did some research on Audio Visual Laboratories and apparently they are
related to the old Eagle computer people. According to Wikipedia, Eagle had
a relationship with Corvus for hard drives and backup so I am thinking this
board *may* be a Corvus XT Mirror board relabeled by AVL. That is a guess
though.
http://n8vem-sbc.pbwiki.com/browse/#view=ViewFolder
<http://n8vem-sbc.pbwiki.com/browse/#view=ViewFolder¶m=AVL> ¶m=AVL
Does anyone recognize this board? Does anyone have software and/or
documentation for the Corvus IBM XT Mirror? I already checked bitsavers.org
and Howard's archive. They mention the existence of an "IBM XT Mirror"
board but almost no other information on it.
Any help is much appreciated. Thanks in advance. Have a nice day!
Andrew Lynch
I have been gathering information on how to clean and properly lubricate
a DEC PC05 and an ASR 33. The teletype manual calls out KS-7470 oil and
KS-7471 grease. Googling, I find that there are a great number of
lubricants with KS numbers. What is the origin of this number? It seems
like it is some kind of directory of lubricants, but I can't find a
listing. I found a cross for KS-7471 in an old AT&T purchasing document,
but none for KS-7470.
-chuck
I wouldn't call the TK-81 a "mix-up". Google the Timex/Sinclair 1500.
Al
----- Original Message ----
From: "Alexandre Souza" <alexandre-listas at e-secure.com.br>
Since I wrote about the brazilian apples, I'll write a bit about the
brazilian mix-up clones.
A "mix-up" is a clone with a whole different cabinet, copied from
another computer.
Here we go:
TK85 (microdigital) - ZX81 with 16K and some circuit enhancements,
Cabinet from Sinclair Spectrum
Eric J Korpela <korpela at ssl.berkeley.edu> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 1:04 PM, Warren Wolfe <lists at databasics.us> wrote:
>> > That many
>> > orders of magnitude of complexity have come and gone since the IMSAI days
>> > are good, in terms of what one's money will buy today, but bad in that one
>> > is much less likely to be able to fix one's own equipment to component
>> > level. It's not as satisfying to say "Hmmm. You need a new video card" as
>> > to hold up the offending transistor and cackle. Or is that just me?
>
> Maybe I'm seeing this from a different angle... I don't see a lot of
> difference besides the complexity of the devices. A transistor is a
> device that you buy because you can't make one yourself without
> spending way too much money. A video card is essentially the same
> thing. You can make one yourself. Some day we will be forced to in
> order to keep our machines running. The main difference is that the
> theory of operation of a transistor can be expressed in a 1 page
> document. The theory of operation of a video card is a small book
> that requires references to other books.
And herein is a big problem. People today don't even know what a
transistor is.
The difference compared to a video card is huge, but you need to know
all this to understand that.
Yes, you can build your own transistor. It isn't difficult, and it isn't
expensive (well, compared to a transistor I guess it might be, but we're
still talking close to no money). All it requires is two diodes. That's
all it is, really.
A transistor (and now I'm just talking about bipolar transistors, since
it's the easiest, and they are very common) is extremely simply to
understand and build.
But why do that when someone have already done it for you?
The big point, however, is that a transistor is very small, extremely
cheap, and easily replaceable. A video card have none of those
attributes, and that's the real point here. You can't "fix" a video
card. You replace it. Whatever is build with discrete transistors
however, can be fixed. If the transistor breaks, you replace it.
Fixing a video card is extremely difficult at best, and in the future I
suspect that will be a lost cause. Fixing whatever item made of discrete
components will easily be done a 100 years from now, I dare say.
Johnny
--
Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus
|| on a psychedelic trip
email: bqt at softjar.se || Reading murder books
pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol
>
>Subject: Re: What kind of IC is this
> From: ard at p850ug1.demon.co.uk (Tony Duell)
> Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 22:50:52 +0000 (GMT)
> To: cctalk at classiccmp.org
>
>> > If you're lucky, eitehr th microcontroller is old enough not to
>> > have any
>> > security features, or they're not used. In which case you remove
>> > the chip
>> > from the PCB and stick it in a suitable programmer.
>>
>> Even the original Intel 8051/8751, circa 1980, has security
>> bits. :-( There are ways to get around (at least) those, though.
>
>Yes, but IIRC the 8048 series (common in classic computer stuff) doesn't...
>
>-tony
My fractional portion of currency is that the 630x is a hitachi varient of the
680x (6800 single chip mpus). I've seen and have some them from older hard
disks and DC300 tape drives that had mechanically expired.
Allison
> From: ard at p850ug1.demon.co.uk (Tony Duell)
> Subject: Re: The General Approach to Computing - A Ramble
>
>> And, while I like playing with the old computers, and fixing them,
>> nothing beats screaming speed in a personal computer.
>
> Now that's something that's never bothered me .If my machine takes 10
> minutes to complie my program, so what? I just do something else while
> it's compiling. And it gets me to check my code before compiling it,
> hopefully ending up with a etter program (the 'poke and hope' brigade
> worry me -- changing things until the program compiles and/or runs)
It depends on the size of the program. I work on a a program which
used to have a million lines of source code and on a 2GHz Intel
MacBook Pro takes around 10 minutes to compile for debugging. Building
the final version on our PowerPC server for two target architectures
take a good half hour.
You can imagine how long it would take to compile on my 1301 where the
shortest instruction (NOP) is 12 microseconds and the longest
(multiply with both operands of 12 non zero digits) is 3784
microseconds.
I have recently constructed an RS232 interface for my 1301 (Just a
level changer and one bit input the processor can sample, no fancy
UART or SCC) and using a USB to serial converter on the Mac have
connected the two. A six instruction bootstrap hand keyed into Flossie
(my 1301) and a download and go high level assembler in the Mac mean I
can write software whenever and wherever I happen to have a few
minutes free. Back at home I can power up Flossie and usually find the
core memory still contains my bootstrap, then assemble and squirt the
program down the serial port at 9600 baud, which wouldn't take long,
even to load the entire 2000 words (48 bits) core store. So far my
biggest program is only about two hundred words. When I fill the core
I'll have to start overlaying off drum or tape, or even Mac when I get
serial output working too.
I am hoping to retrieve software from about 100,000 punched cards via
the check reading brushes of the card punch, which is much more gentle
on old cards than the real card reader. Then it will be time to start
on the programs on magnetic tape, but first I have to get a higher
speed parallel interface working so I can read the tapes without
stopping between blocks and risk stretching/breaking 40 year old tapes.
I have been looking into getting the line printer working. There are
120 off 100 microfarad 100v capacitors which hold the energy required
to fire the print hammer solenoids. Each on is about an inch diameter
and three inches long. The modern equivalent is tiny and will not even
reach between the holes in the PCB, but the leads can be extended. Of
course they don't look right, maybe I should think about opening the
old cans and putting the new components inside. Maybe there are
harmful chemicals inside.
When a transistor or diode fails I don't have the option of buying new
ones, but fortunately I have ample spares of used ones of most types.
Most times I can replace the whole card (four AND gates, one flip
flop, one inverter and re-inverter, a clock gate or dozens of types of
amplifiers/attenuators). Occasionally the fault is with the wiring or
wire wrap or soldered joint. All these are very reliable but there are
literally millions of them so the odd one failing is not really
surprising.
Core failures are a totally different problem. The official method is
to use a spare row or column which has worked fine so far though long
term I am worried about running out. I don't think my eyesight would
be up to remaking a whole core plane but one day it might be necessary
to get it done.
I enjoy the intellectual task of finding the location of a logic fault
but not mechanical problems, they are just something which has to be
done, a pain in the backside.
I purchased an 820-II from eBay, but the seller did a horrible packing job
and it arrived with the case completely smashed.
Incredibly enough, the CRT was not shattered and once I diassembled it and
spread things out, it nominally fires up. I get the monitor sign-on and a
beep, but no keyboard response at all.
I've already tried reseating everything on the system board and fixed a
bad solder joint on the crystal for the keyboard MPU. No luck.
I have some schematics from the web, but they are extremely fuzzy and hard
to read. Can anyone help with theory of operation for an 820 keyboard?
I gather that it's a parallel data interface, but past that I'm a bit in
the dark.
I should mention that I'm running without a disk drive. The seller "lost"
it and I have the carcass of another on the way from a kind cctech group
member. Still, I would think there'd be some response to keyboard input
without the drive on line.
Steve
--
A few new documents are up under http://bitsavers.org/pdf/intel/MDS2
including the service manual (which unfortunately has two sheets missing
which describe part of the IOC board). Clean copies of the schematics are
there, though.
Jim Battle <frustum at pacbell.net> wrote:
> Johnny Billquist wrote:
> ...
>> > It isn't difficult, and it isn't
>> > expensive (well, compared to a transistor I guess it might be, but we're
>> > still talking close to no money).
>
> Maybe it is possible to build a transistor that has poor gain, low
> bandwidth, and poor stability, probably like the first transistors made.
>
> Jeri Ellsworth built some FETs and simple gates at home -- but she said
> it took two years to figure out how to make it work, and she needed some
> equipment (like vacuum chambers) that few people have at home. It was
> far from simple.
>
> http://trail.motionbased.com/trail/episode/view.do?episodePk.pkValue=8067618
>
> Yes, that is a FET, not bipolar. If you have some links for making
> simple bipolar transistors, please supply some. It will make for some
> interesting reading.
>
> I recall reading how IBM spent a lot of money and a lot of brainpower
> building their own transistors back in the early days. If it really was
> all that simple, I doubt that IBM would have wrestled with it as much as
> they did.
I purposely picked bipolar since they're easy. I haven't looked at what
it would take to make a FET. Don't think it's that relevant to reply
with stuff about FETs to a post about bipolars. :-)
>> > All it requires is two diodes. That's
>> > all it is, really.
>
> If you wire two diodes in series (PN->NP), it isn't the same as a
> transistor (PNP), at all.
It is. A PNP is just the same thing as a PN-+-NP.
The things left that vary is the areas between the PN and NP layers,
which would be equal if you just jused two diodes, but usually are
dissimilar in a transistor. That can be solved by using different
diodes, or putting two in parallel.
What else? Yeah, the amount of doping is also relevant. All this ends up
to is that different transistors have different specs (just as different
diodes do). You'd hardly replace a transistor with a couple of diodes on
a card anyway, since it would be so much trickier soldering wise, and
possible space wise anyway, not even considering characteristics. But
that don't change the fact that you get a working transistor with just
two diodes.
>> > A transistor (and now I'm just talking about bipolar transistors, since
>> > it's the easiest, and they are very common) is extremely simply to
>> > understand and build.
>
> I've heard of people disassembling a diode and making a point contact
> transistor, but that is already leveraging a lot of technology that put
> the $.10 diode in your hand to begin with.
Well, I did say that you'd have to use diodes. If you consider it
cheating to use diodes, then I plead guilty. It's very difficult to make
a transistor if you're only allowed to use copper, aluminium and silicon.
However, all this was just an exercise in sidetracking. The real point
was that something built with transistors can be repaired by just
replacing the transistor. A very standard, small and cheap component
that you probably still can get a hundred years from now. A graphics
card will never be at that situation. If it's broke, you replace it. Ten
years from now, that will not even be an option, since those graphics
cards are no longer manufactured, and even the bus which they interface
to is probably obsolete, meaning no other graphic card can be found
either. And it is not possible to repair it, since it's just a bunch of
highly intergrated ICs on it, which you cannot obtain, nor diagnose
which one of them actually is busted. They are also close to impossible
to remove.
Johnny
--
Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus
|| on a psychedelic trip
email: bqt at softjar.se || Reading murder books
pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol
I inherited a HP Designjet 500PS.
It has earlier in it's life a magenta printhead explosion... so was a
mess inside
(nobody bothered to properly disassemble and clean the printer....
Did that, including disassembly and reassmbly of the service station.
However, yellow stopped working... so it can't align print heads.... so
I picked
to primed tubes... but that needs a set of setup printheads that I don't
have....
and I can't get out of that step even with a power cycle.... couldn't try to
'clean' the heads either.... as it needs to align the heads first ...
which fails as
yellow is not printing.... so I've gotten myself into a realy catch 22
situation with
it....
And now I'm stuck w/o setup print heads.
So, does anyone have or know where to cheaply get a set of setup printheads
for a designjet 500, 500PS, 800, or 800PS (should all be the same). A
replacement
ink tube spare part would have the carts as well.
This is the 25" variety, but other than the spare ink tube kit being
different for
25" vs 42", the setup printheads would all be the same.
Anyone have a service station... this one fails sometimes when it tries
to ratchet
the big wheel on the left side of the service station...
Could also use a set of print heads.
Thanks,
-- Curt
>From: Vernon Wright <vern4wright at yahoo.com>
>Subject: Re: Ciarcia's Circuit Cellar
>
>I've built a number of Steve's projects. In my workshop a few days ago I
saw his EEG project >waiting to be revived.
I was the prime instigator in the HAL-4 project. When I lived in CT I was a
member of the CT Computer Club with Steve. He was always looking for ideas
for his monthly column. Being a psychologist (but almost EE major) I had
worked with biofeedback and thought a low cost EEG unit would be cool. I
wrote the specs for the hardware and software and the non-technical parts of
the article while 2 other club members did the hardware and software
respectively, and Steve Many hundreds of these kits were sold over the
years - I know because I enjoyed a $3/unit royalty on each one :-)
Never-before-revealed-fact: I spec'd the design to have two switches which
the operator could use to signal awareness of up to 3 internal states to see
if they could be correlated with the brainwave pattern. In fact, I was
inspired by Tim Leary's 'experiential typewriter' which he speculated could
be used similarly when he first started experimenting with LSD.
Brainwave feedback and analysis have progressed greatly in the past 20+
years and there's no reason why the PC software couldn't be re-written,
though not many people have a serial port to which to connect HAL. I
suppose an inline serial USB converter could be used.
I believe there is still open source hardware specs and description
available on the web.
Bob Stek
Former Saver of Lost Sols
(On topic, as NCSA Mosaic was killed in 1997.)
So, I have nothing to do on weekends except sit on highway overpasses and
snipe cars with a high powered rifle. Because of the terms of my probation,
I had enough time this weekend in Corcoran to work on this:
http://www.floodgap.com/retrotech/machten/mosaic/
This is another update of NCSA Mosaic, based on 2.7b5. I started with that
and fixed a couple seriously crippling bugs for 2.7ck6, and in this version
2.7ck7, there are more improvements to the HTML core, fixed a lot of bugs
with Gopher support, and cleaned up the source so that it would also compile
under Mac OS X.
There is a Universal binary for 10.4+ (requires X11 and OpenMotif, download
links are on the page), plus source, and source builds on Power MachTen and
most versions of OS X in general. If people build this successfully on other
systems like Linux, *BSD, etc., I would like feedback.
I'm considering porting this to A/UX next, but I will not have access to
A/UX in San Quentin, so I'd better hurry up.
--
------------------------------------ personal: http://www.cameronkaiser.com/ --
Cameron Kaiser * Floodgap Systems * www.floodgap.com * ckaiser at floodgap.com
-- I had amnesia once -- or twice. --------------------------------------------
Hello all,
Does anyone have any AUI cables they do not need? I could use about five
or six and the shorter, the better. The minimum is 2 meters, I believe.
Cables at 2m or 3m would be ideal. This would be a contribution to the
"worlds most complex network" that is growing in my basement.
Also a source for some thick Ethernet cable would be a big help.
Contact me off list if you can help.
Jim
The first three volumes of the Ciarcia's Circuit Cellar books are now
available for online viewing (but not downloading) at Google Books.
These books collect Steve Ciarcia's 70s/80s Byte columns - lots of
interesting stuff.
Links here: http://www.circuitcellar.com/newsletter/0409.html
I have no relation to these scans but thought I'd pass the link along
since these books come up now and then on the list and have lots of
classiccmp-relevant content.
-- Adam
We'll see what Steve has to say about it. I think he has those books for
sale, doesn't he?
I used to have my secretary xerox his columns (no, I didn't cut out of my
Byte magazines, though that collection has long since been deep-sixed) but I
don't know whether I still have those copies - probably "somewhere" but I'll
be damned if I know where that "somewhere" is.
I've built a number of Steve's projects. In my workshop a few days ago I saw
his EEG project waiting to be revived.
But there is so much to do....
Vern Wright
-----REPLY-----
Hi! Steve and Sean generously released BYOZ80C to allow online publishing.
I very much enjoyed his book and commend him for both writing it in the
first place and also releasing it so as to help keep the home brew computing
tradition alive.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/13388965/Build-Your-Own-Z80-Computer
You can see the full description of the release statement on the first page.
Thanks and have a nice day!
Andrew Lynch
For me, the decision wasn't about Windows vs. whatever else. It was cheap, crappy commoditized PC hardware.
For years, I'd upgraded my home desktop machine at such time as I wanted some new toy that wasn't supported on the existing hardware, or I felt I needed more performance/resources/heating. :-) That would happen, on average, every two years or so. Over the past year, I tried to upgrade three times, to be foiled by hardware failures each time. The last motherboard would not even boot up an OS. These weren't cheap bargain-table motherboards, either - they were from reputable vendors, midrange in their price ranges. (I don't need insane gamer perf features.) One burned up, one had quirky, fatal flaws (couldn't detect more than one graphics adapter) and one just never got off the dime.
Now don't get me wrong, I'm not afraid of hardware. I hack deep into hardware both for a living and as a hobby. But if I'm going to spend time hacking hardware, it should be at least twenty years old - in other words, I should be doing it because it's FUN! Then, when I need to see if Bitsavers (thank you!) or Google can help me dig out some obscure fact or figure, I want my desktop to be a reliable appliance. It should Just Work.
That's how I ended up with Macs.
It's not the OS, although I do like the idea of Unix under the hood rather than a compromised derivation of VMS. It's the hardware. It's the integration. It's the appliance-like nature that, I must admit, I ridiculed for years. But when I want to check my email or Google a part number, my Macs always work.
Of course, not to be a complete conformist :-) I don't have an Intel-(de)based Mac in the house. I'm typing this on a PowerBook G4, and my main desktop is a pair of dual G4 PowerMacs, each running two monitors and sharing mouse and keyboard through Synergy. (One of these days, I'm going to improve their integration so it looks like multimon a la Xinerama.) If they weren't so stinkin' expensive (even with being four years obsolete), I'd have G5s, but the G4s are just fine for email, etc. If I can't do it on my Macs, I probably don't need to do it.
Of course, I'm planning to rebuild my VAX 4000/300, and I plan to put SMTP on it this time. I know VMS will always get me my email.... Cheers -- Ian
________________________________________
From: cctalk-bounces at classiccmp.org [cctalk-bounces at classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Jochen Kunz [jkunz at unixag-kl.fh-kl.de]
Sent: Friday, April 24, 2009 11:50 PM
To: cctalk at classiccmp.org
Subject: Re: CDC Remote Calculator, circa 1965
On Fri, 24 Apr 2009 09:18:46 -0700
"Chuck Guzis" <cclist at sydex.com> wrote:
> A PC isn't a "real" computer?
PeeCees are no "real" computers. PeeCees are a pile of cheap junk. At
least when compared to proper personal computers like e.g. Sun, HP or
DEC workstations or even a Mac. But this gets religious now. ;-)
--
tsch??,
Jochen
Homepage: http://www.unixag-kl.fh-kl.de/~jkunz/
micheladam at theedge.ca wrote:
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Johnny Billquist <bqt at softjar.se>
> Date: Thursday, April 23, 2009 4:48 am
> Subject: Re: pdp11/70 front panel frame
>> > If I remember right, the RDC panel reused the 11/70 panel frame,
>> > by the way.
>> >
> [...]
>
> You remember right. I was a computer operator on an 11/70 in the late 70's. When the DEC service technician came by to switch out the standard front panel and replace it with the remote console, only the panel was replaced, not the frame.
>
> Should have kept it. It was pristine...
What? You mean that DEC took the original 11/70 front panel?
That's interesting.
I have two RDC panels (as well as two original fronts), and both of the
RDC panels had some sticker or text saying "Property of DEC. Must be
returned if removed from contract." (or something like that) implying
that the customer didn't own the RDC panel, and the original front panel
were to be reused when the machine went off service. So they couldn't
very well take that panel. It was the property of the customer.
I thought that was standard procedure. Interesting...
Johnny
--
Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus
|| on a psychedelic trip
email: bqt at softjar.se || Reading murder books
pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol
Am I the only classic computer enthusiast left in San Diego?
[snip]
If so, drop me a line. Don't mean to sound needy - but it's lonely down
here. San Diego was a major epicenter of the development of the S-100 CP/M
computer. We're all getting older but it can't be that of 3 million people
I'm the only one left?!?
Vern Wright
-----REPLY-----
Vern, I think the focus of S-100 system development has moved away from the
local area and is now more of an internet phenomenon. CCTALK,
Vintage-Computer.com forums, comp.os.cpm, is where a lot of activity takes
place. There are vintage computer festivals and ham radio conventions where
hobbyists meet but I think the bulk of the communication is via the
internet.
If you'd like to see active S-100 development take place once again, have
you considered starting a home brew hobbyist S-100 project? I started a
home brew computing project a couple of years ago (N8VEM) and it has been
quite successful. There is a lot of interest and all sorts of people have
built their own systems. I've had ideas of expanding the N8VEM system into
S-100 for some time now and am building a hobbyist S-100 backplane.
With the availability of low cost EDA tools and PCB fabrication its possible
for home brew hobbyists to make their home brew systems available for
everyone. Maybe if S-100 hobbyists would design and manufacture a
completely open and free system similar to the N8VEM. Recently, a hobbyist
made a completely new S-100 prototype board. I recall others (Dan Roganti?)
designing new S-100 boards months ago too. For example, start with a
backplane, another hobbyist makes a linear or SMPSU power supply PCB,
another a CPU board, yet another builds a SRAM board, someone else a serial
UART board, etc.
Many hands makes light work so maybe it could happen. I am optimistic its
possible although I am aware of the many hobbyist projects that have been
attempted on CCTALK. I think it would be fun and might recapture some of
that "lightning in a bottle" magic from the early home brew microcomputer
community.
Andrew Lynch
Chuck,
As part of the promotion of this product, each Sales office got one.
I was in Atlanta at that time (1966). So I got some time on it and
hauled it out to Lockheed for a dog and pony show. Was called the
6060. No manual that I ever found even though I looked for years.
I remember how heavy it was, a real back breaker to lug around.
Eventually we had to send it back for "updating" and it was never
returned.
Billy Pettit
As was last year, 2009 brings me to the Bay Area for all sorts of
foolishness and relaxation. I will be in town generally from 3 MAY
thru 7 MAY, and would be interested in meeting with anyone that would
like to show off their collections, or even just meet for dinner and a
beer.
Any interest?
--
Will
On 23 Apr 2009, at 11:26, cctalk-request at classiccmp.org wrote:
>
> Stumbled across this today and don't recall it having been mentioned
> on the list before.
>
> "Welcome to Silicon Genesis, a unique collection of oral history
> interviews with pioneers of the semiconductor industry. For access
> to streamed versions of the videotaped interviews, see the
> complete listing of interviews."
>
> <http://silicongenesis.stanford.edu/complete_listing.html>
Too modern for me, my classic semiconductors are Germanium :-)
Perhaps they allow the relay/valve/germanium generation (which does
NOT include me by the way) to contribute too.
Ad for a CDC 6600 remote calculator terminal on ePay, item
390046087434.
Has anyone seen one of these in the flesh, or was this a trial
balloon that never flew?
--Chuck
My PDP-11 is so lonely out here in Las Vegas,
it has been sneaking out of the house at night.
I've had to drag it out of at least two casinos already.
I knew I should have never compiled that blackjack program. ;-(
Am I the only classic computer enthusiast left in San Diego?
Since Will Rose decamped for England, and Don Maslin died, and Bill Bailey died last year, it seems that there is no one here who shares my/our interests. It's all Windoze (oh, I wish OS/2 had made it!) and Linux. No aspersion cast on either (well, even though I write for both, you get my feeling from my spelling of the former) - but there is no one here who has the slightest interest in anything before y2k! Local groups consider "technical" playing with the latest piece of hardware from Fry's.
Just wondering if there are any lurkers here who are in a similar situation, and would like to resurrect my old Dina-SIG in the form of talking, playing with, experimenting with classic computers. Maybe developing new ideas (Bill Bailey and I, before he died, were working on concepts for biological computers)....
If so, drop me a line. Don't mean to sound needy - but it's lonely down here. San Diego was a major epicenter of the development of the S-100 CP/M computer. We're all getting older but it can't be that of 3 million people I'm the only one left?!?
Vern Wright
It so happens that a man in Boulder, CO has one, possibly two DEC H960
racks with Kennedy 9000 1/2 inch tape units. The racks look to be in
very nice condition, no sides, but have the plain DEC purple/magenta
headers on the tops, also in nice condition. The Kennedys are mounted
in these racks, but could come out. One Kennedy is troubled, the other
is believed to work.
I am in Boulder today and tomorrow, and can deliver these to the Bay
Area in CA during the first week of May (3 thru 7).
I think he would like $100 for each rack, and probably something very
much less for the tape units. Nothing is bundled - buy one or both
racks, and/or buy one or both tape units.
Any interested people should not dawdle on this - please let me know
tonight, or at latest early tomorrow. There might be some bargaining
room on price - or maybe not. Regardless, I might need something for
hauling this stuff, to pay for gas.
--
Will
----- Original Message -----
From: Johnny Billquist <bqt at softjar.se>
Date: Thursday, April 23, 2009 4:48 am
Subject: Re: pdp11/70 front panel frame
> Paul Anderson <useddec at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I think I have a few front panels left, including the RDC, but
> not sure of the frames. Are they the same as an 11/40 or 11/45?
>
> I don't think so. It's been very long since I played with an
> 11/40, but
> the 11/40 and 11/45 have way fewer switches than the 11/70, and
> the
> frame lines up with the switches on the 11/70.
> Can't remember for sure the exact details of the 11/40 I played
> with,
> but it must have had some kind of filler on the panel, to get to
> the edges.
>
> If I remember right, the RDC panel reused the 11/70 panel frame,
> by the way.
>
[...]
You remember right. I was a computer operator on an 11/70 in the late 70's. When the DEC service technician came by to switch out the standard front panel and replace it with the remote console, only the panel was replaced, not the frame.
Should have kept it. It was pristine...
Michel Adam
Paul Anderson <useddec at gmail.com> wrote:
> I think I have a few front panels left, including the RDC, but not sure of the frames. Are they the same as an 11/40 or 11/45?
I don't think so. It's been very long since I played with an 11/40, but
the 11/40 and 11/45 have way fewer switches than the 11/70, and the
frame lines up with the switches on the 11/70.
Can't remember for sure the exact details of the 11/40 I played with,
but it must have had some kind of filler on the panel, to get to the edges.
If I remember right, the RDC panel reused the 11/70 panel frame, by the way.
By the way, I could kill whoever broke an 11/70 just to have a panel.
And that panel on ePay looks really clean (but that's just me, and I
don't like ePay at all anyway).
Johnny
> On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 6:39 PM, David Griffith <dgriffi at cs.csubak.edu>wrote:
>> >
>> > Does anyone here know where I could obtain a front panel frame for a
>> > pdp11/70?
>> >
>> > --
>> > David Griffith
>> > dgriffi at cs.csubak.edu
>> >
>> > A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text.
>> > Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
>> > A: Top-posting.
>> > Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
>> >
--
Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus
|| on a psychedelic trip
email: bqt at softjar.se || Reading murder books
pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol
Well, while I'm waiting for various things to arrive to aid my
resuscitation of my 11/40, I'm back to working on my IMSAI 8080.
The front panel does not work quite right with the combination of CPU
and RAM I have in the machine, so I've been debugging various things and
have made some decent progress. Now Examine and Examine Next work
properly. Deposit/Deposit Next, however, do not.
Reading through the CPA manual I got from
http://www.classiccmp.org/dunfield/imsai/cpa.pdf, there's a modification
that needs to be done to get the front panel to work with non-IMSAI RAM
cards -- this has not been done to my front panel.
Seems that that might be at least part of the problem. But step 3 (see
pg 26, for those following along at home) refers to Fig 2, referencing
points A & B. Figure 2 is not in the PDF. There is a schematic on page
28 outlining the change, but it's unreadable.
Anyone have a copy of Fig 2 they can share?
Thanks!
Josh
Ethan Dicks <ethan.dicks at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 1:36 PM, F.J. Kraan <fjkraan at xs4all.nl> wrote:
>
>> Just recently I was able to read my MiniMINC (a PDT-150) floppies with an 8"
>> drive connected to an AHA1542B (capable of single density) with Dave
>> Dunfields ImageDisk.
>>
>
> Good to know. I have at least one 1542B running around, and an old
> DOS box I can use to stuff it all into.
>
> What 8" floppy did you use? I think I have a Tandon one (TM848?) I
> can borrow from a non-DEC Qbus box.
>
The drive is a NEC 1165, very flexible. It allowed me to write to a disk
with only the wrong index hole, so the MiniMINC wouldn't see it. Writing
RT-11 V3b to the right disk it booted . So writing with this setup is
also possible. The 5 1/4" to 8" interface can the one from Dave Dunfield
or the CP/M faq.
I will try it with a Catweasel one day, but the current setup seems more
common, and a MiniMINC doesn't do RX02 anyhow :-).
Would posting an URL with the images of the disks be ok?
Fred Jan
I haven't followed this thread, but at least at one time (circa 1995) there was an outfit near or in Philly that would cut the neck off of yer crt and presumably meld a new face (?) to it. Sounds like fun. You work the buzzsaw and I'll be in the other room checking on your medical coverage.
Does anyone here know where I could obtain a front panel frame for a
pdp11/70?
--
David Griffith
dgriffi at cs.csubak.edu
A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
I've updated the p112 and zsdos pdf files to fix some stupid errors that I
never noticed. I also widened the text area. They're at
http://frotz.homeunix.org/p112/files/
--
David Griffith
dgriffi at cs.csubak.edu
A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
I'd like to get a pdp 11/70 front panel with frame. Would anyone here
take a Northstar Horizon in trade?
--
David Griffith
dgriffi at cs.csubak.edu
A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
I've just been handed a small DEC badged unit, which I think is a terminal. It appears to have been made by Termiflex.
It is a handheld unit with a two line LED display, a 4x5 keypad, three unmarked buttons on one side, and a wheel device on the other.
It has a 25 way D type and a 3 pole AMP connector.
Does anyone know anything about it?
Jim.
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 5:16 PM, Robert Jarratt
<robert.jarratt at ntlworld.com> wrote:
> Far from exhaustive, but I do find this page useful:
>
> http://www.netbsd.org/docs/Hardware/Machines/DEC/vax/sections.html
That is a good list of some of the newer stuff. It obviously misses
out on much of the pre-1972 hardware, but it's a good start to
understand DEC's patterns.
-ethan
Some of the smoke came out of my Osborne 1 this weekend. It doesn't
appear to have been fatal, as it was still functioning when I cut the
power. I'm giving the CRT some time to fully discharge before I open
it up, probably next weekend. It was probably a failing capacitor,
although it didn't explode, it merely got really warm over a period of
hours. But since there are some similar machines that I haven't
recently used, this question came to mind.
I've used the variac technique to reform capacitors, but thus far
haven't done this on a machine that contains a CRT because I don't
know what the reduced voltage is going to do to the CRT. The next
machine to power up on my list is a Compucolor II. Dare I power it at
15 volts for a few days before starting the slow ramp up to 115? Or
do I need to go in and detach the CRT circuitry before I try anything
like that.?
Hi,
Since noone else seems to have sent this to the list yet, I thought I would send a snippet and a link for those who might be interested in this.
Snippet:
NEW YORK, April 20: The world's number two software company, Oracle
Corporation, today agreed to buy hardware provider Sun Microsystems Inc
for $7.4 billion, or $9.50 per share, in cash, pushing the software
company into high-end computing system.
?We expect this acquisition to be accretive to Oracles earnings by at
least 15 cents on a non-GAAP?basis in the first full year after
closing. The business will contribute over $1.5 billion to Oracles
non-GAAP?operating profit in the first year, increasing to over $2
billion in the second year,? Oracle president Ms Safra?Catz?said in a
statement.
Source:
http://www.thestatesman.net/page.news.php?clid=12&theme=&usrsess=1&id=251752
Regards,
Andrew B
aliensrcooluk at yahoo.co.uk