I am currently rack-mounting my PDP8/e and its peripherals. And of course I want
to have the peripherals power up when I turn on the CPU. I have an 861 power
controller in the rack, but you can't just link that to the power
control sockets
on the CPU, DEC changed the wiring at some point...
Let me explain.
The 3 pin power control sockets on the 861 and just about every other power
controller and all my PDP11s carry the following 3 signals : Ground, On/ (ground
to turn the unit on) and Off/ (ground to force the unit off, e.g. for
an overheat
shutdown).
The 3 pin sockets on the PDP8/e CPU are not wired quite in parallel. One pin
is ground. Another pin is On/ (as above). But the middle pins are linked via the
frontpanel switch and overheat thermostat. The normal thing to do is to put
a jumper in each socket so that one side of the switch is grounded, the other
goes to On/. If you have more overheat thermostats in peripheral boxes, they
can be linked into the chain. There is a mains output on the PDP8/e PSU that
was (according to the printset) used to operate a contactor directly to power
up the peripherals.
A moment's thought made me realise you could use a normal power controller
with the PDP8/e. The only disadvantage is that the overheat switch in the
power controller would not shut down the CPU. Since I don't run my machines
unattended that is no great loss.
What I did was to cut a normal DEC power control cable (with the 3 pin plug
one each end) in half. Call the 2 halves 'CPU' and 'Pwr'
Then wire as follows :
CPU/Green (Gnd) - Pwr/Green (Gnd)
CPU/Red (On/) --->|--- CPU/Black (Switch)
Pwr/Red (On/) --->|--- CPU/Black (Switch)
Pwr/Black (Off/) : Not connected
Now plug the ends into the power controller and one of the CPU
power control sockets (make sure you have them the right way
round). In the other CPU power control socket fit the jumper plug
that links the middle pin to ground.
The idea is that when the CPU switch turns on, both the CPU On/
line and the power controller On/ line are pulled to ground via the
diodes. The diodes prevent the voltage from one power switching
circuit ending up in the other.
The diodes can be just about anything that will carry the power
relay coil current. I used 1N4007's as I happen to have them to
hand. I built it in a spare telephone junction box with 6 pairs of
terminals. One set of terminals carries the cables. The other
set carries the diodes and a wire between the 2 ground wires.
Needless to say construction is not critical. It's very low speed,
it's about 24V (and isolated from the mains) at < 1A.
-tony
I have a very nice SWTPC 6800 for sale. Please see the ad on the VCF
forums for complete information.
If you have inquiries, please do send them directly to me via e-mail.
Thanks!
Sellam
> From: Alfred M. Szmidt
> System 46 for the MIT CADR is licensed under a 3-clause BSD license --
> start hacking. ;-) You even have an emulator for the MIT CADR.
Everyone seems to have blown right past this, but it might be important.
Does anyone know if the Lambda matches the CADR? Or did they make changes
('improvements')? I always had the impression that it was basically a CADR
clone.
A CADR emulator, running the MIT code, would certainly be OK.
Noel
Hi folks,
Clear one problem and hit another is just what I expect to happen with this
Executel :)
After last weekend's little breakthrough my little machine is now hitting a
loop that LOOKS like it's waiting for an RST6.5 interrupt*, but at the same
time the A9 line is doing this:
http://www.binarydinosaurs.co.uk/STCExecutelOddTraceA9.jpg
(scale doubled for ease of viewing)
That doesn't look normal to me, but all 8 chips that touch A9 check out OK
and there's nothing odd resistance wise.
Before I start chasing my tail again I thought I'd ask first...
(*for anyone interested RST6.5 is triggered by the TS1/TS2 status lines from
the MR9735 teletext decoder and should be constantly active while video is
being output. At one point Tony suggested this chip needs to be initialised
and there is indeed a control word that can be passed to it to turn it on
and off which makes me wonder if there's another memory bit stuck somewhere)
Cheers!
--
Adrian/Witchy
Binary Dinosaurs creator/curator
Www.binarydinosaurs.co.uk - the UK's biggest private home computer
collection?
Hello,
amongst other panels and things (CDC 6600 dead start panel, PDP-15
frontpanel) I got this one:
http://up.picr.de/28257957bg.jpg
I *guess* it also comes from the CDC 6600 but I'm not sure. Can anyone
identify it?
Christian
I have at least one 11/44 for sale, at least one 11/24 for sale. I can
configure them as needed within reason. They can be packed and shipped as
freight carrier of your choice or pickup in IL. or IN. Please contact me
off list.
Also the following parts:
M7090
M7094
M7095
M7096
M7097
M7098
$300/SET (several available)
70-15672 backplane $70
M7093 FP11-A make offer
M7819 DZ11 board only $50
Any quantity boards ship for $10 within US.
Thanks, Paul
Next milestone reached:
tu58fs 1.0 now supports the RT-11 file system, additional to DOS11/XXDP
(phew!)
And its easier to use: I also precompiled binaries f?r Linux x64, Win32
Cygwin, ARM Beaglebone Black and RPi.
Also some batch files show typical usage, XXDP/RT-11 tape and disk
images are included.
Docs on http://retrocmp.com/tools/tu58fs
Precompiled releases at https://github.com/j-hoppe/tu58fs/releases
The RT-11 filesystem has the special features of "extended directory
entries" and "file prefixes". These are fully supported by tu58fs, but I
never heard of real-life usage. Anybody can talk about it, or has RT-11
images with dir extension and/or file prefixes?
best,
Joerg