> From: William Donzelli
> We, the big iron collectors, do not share this information on any sort
> of registry. We are a secretive bunch.
Why is that, can I ask? I mean, it's not like a thief's going to come in and
steal the thing (which is indeed the reason why collectors in other areas are
often secretive) - it would take a truck and a crane, for most models!
> From: Liam Proven
> Have you read Lawrence Wilkison's account of rescuing an S360/20 in NZ
> when he was a student?
Cool story; thanks for the link - but the page says it was a 360/30. (The
smallest 'real' 360 - the 360/20 was a lobotomized 'sorta' 360/.)
Noel
CHM was able to obtain volumes 18-20 of the IBM 2050 drawings, which are
the microcode charts and ROS dump. I got them scanned and uploaded yesterday
to http://bitsavers.org/pdf/ibm/360/fe/2050
This was one of the things that I had been trying to locate for a while now.
PDP11GUI is at v1.46 now.
Among others I fixed an annoying bug, which prevented proper terminal
output when running certain diagnostic paper tapes:
Filling <NUL> chars were sometimes interpreted as backspace!
Load from http://retrocmp.com/tools/pdp11gui
As ever, any feedback is welcome,
Joerg
> From: tony duell
>> I have a Plessey PM-D11/SPC-1 backplane here
> How many slots? I assume it's hex height. What (if anything) are the
> power input connectors?
9; yes; it has the standard 9-pin connector as used on the 11/05-10, and the
early /40s and /45s. (FWLIW, the documentation for the PM-F11 says that _it_
comes with either the same 9-pin connector power harness, or the harness with
the newer 15-/6-pin connector pair, and gives part numbers for each.)
The harness of this one is subtly different, though - instead of all fast-on
tabs at the backplane end, there is a DuPont header on the backplane (looks
like 10 pin), and a bunch of the pins on the large 9-pin connector are
connected to that (not just ACLO and DCLO, but e.g. there are a pair which
are connected to +5V, and another pair to ground (the latter two also go to
fast-on tabs).
> Is there any reason to assume it's not a clone of a standard DEC
> backplane ... the 'SPC' part of the name suggests a Unibus peripheral
> backplane
Oh, I'm sure it's _some_ form of SPC backplane - it has the NPG jumpers from
CA1 to CB1 on all 9 slots, for instance. And it has a bunch of wires running
>from 1A/B down to the CDEF part, and then back from CDEF to 9A/B. And the NPG
is routed from 1A down to CA1/CA2, and then back up to 9A.
But I'm trying to figure out exactly what sort of SPC backplane it is. E.g.
it looks like slots 2-8 _might_ be MUD (the signals from 1A/B are bussed
across all those slots on A/B, over to 9A/B). But without documentation, or
a lot of ohm-meter work...
Noel
Hi, all, I have a Plessey PM-D11/SPC-1 backplane here, and I'm interested in
finding some documentation for it. I looked online, but couldn't find
anything?
This site:
http://www.compsy.de/gebr-vax/repman_verl.htm
seems to list one, and does apparently 'rent' documentation, but I'm not sure
they're ready to rent something to someone on another continent. (If someone
in Europe can assist in dealing with them, I'd be extremely grateful.)
I do have a manual for the vaguely similar PM-F11/SPC backplane (which I would
be happy to scan promptly if anyone has a need for it; otherwise, it will get
scanned when I obtain a round tuit), and that, plus an ohmmeter, would
probably allow me to eventually figure out the PM-D11, but I figured I'd look
and see if I could save all that work, and put it into something else... :-)
Noel
On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 5:43 AM, Johnny Billquist <bqt at update.uu.se> wrote:
>> The Z-machine for RT-11 that Infocom released only handled v3 images.
>
> I only knew of the V1 version, for the original Zork I. I never knew that
> Infocom released anything past Zork I for RT-11.
I can't seem to find the definitive catalog, but I know there were
folio packaging of several of the titles available for sale. I saw
Starcross hanging on the wall at the Digital Store in Columbus, OH
(back when there _was_ a brick-and-mortar store), and I am reasonable
certain there were others, definitely more than just the V1 Zork.
>> You can run a v3 game comfortably in 48K bytes...
>> As for the PDP-11, one _could_ write a split-I&D interpreter for
>> larger games...
>
> Um? Where have you been? ZEMU have been around for about 15 years now. It
> runs all V1 to V8 games, and runs under both RT-11 and RSX.
I think I forgot ZEMU has support past V5. My apologies.
> On MIM:: (once more)
> .zem/li/sy
> -- System games --
> Game Release Serial Inform Z-Machine
> ADVENT 5 961209 6.05 5
> ZDUNGEON 13 040826 6.14 5
:-)
> ZTREK 1 000229 6.21 5
Ooh... that's right... there's an implentation of Star Trek on the
Z-machine. I'll have to go grab that to see which version it's based
on. Personally, I'm used to the one that was in Dave Ahl's "101
Computer Games", the one that has the short range scan that represents
each item with up to three chars and empty locations with all spaces
(as opposed to a simple grid with 1 char per filled spot and, ISTR, a
'.' for empty locations).
When I get the opportunity (later this weekend I think) I will check
my backups for the RSTS/E mod I was mentioning. If the RT-11 ZEMU
doesn't compile on RSTS/E as is, it should be a 1-line mod.
-ethan
Anyone got any RT11/RSTS-E games? I'm back on with my project to recreate
the PDP-11 that I goofed around with when I was a kid. (Its accessible via
the bbs... bbs.cortex-media.info 4223)
I have 2.52 version of Dungeon, and a version of Star Trek. Anyone got
anything else?
I'm still looking for Oregon Software Pascal as well...
Thanks!
Mark
> From: Jon Elson
> Well, first, rotary converters draw a LOT of imaginary power (in other
> words, they have an awful power factor) and so the line current can
> become MUCH higher than you would expect.
> ...
> We tried to rig up a phase converter scheme to run the motor-generator
> set on a 370/145 in a guy's house, and it did NOT go well. he only had
> a 60 A 240 V service, and the imaginary current was over 60 A!
Had to Google 'imaginary power'... Not a lot of experience with high-power AC
stuff! :-) ('Imaginary power' is probably not the best term to use, because
there are actual currents involved; I like the 'reactive power' name better.)
The article I read said that in reactive load which is high in inductance
(which is, I assume, the source of the high reactive load in rotary
convertors - or am I confused - a common happening, I concede :-), judicious
application of capacitance can reduce the reactive load. Why isn't this used
with rotary convertors to reduce their reactive load?
Any idea what the active and reactive powers/currents were in that attempted
installation?
Noel