>
> I have to make a console cable for the VAX4000/300 and an VT420 Terminal.
> How are the pins to be connected? One to One or with an rollover
> (1-6,2-5,4-3)?
>
As far as I understand it, pretty much all MMJ sockets are wired the same
and the crossover between transmit and receive normally happens in the cable
so you need the rollover.
Even if this is not true in 100% of cases, it does appear to be true at least
in the case of connecting terminals to hosts.
Regards,
Peter Coghlan.
I have a sizable collection of HP-1000 circuit cards, as well as a couple of PDP cards.
They take up a lot of space in my workshop, so I'd like to find a home for them.
Please see my web site here for a complete list of parts:
The H.P. Friedrichs (AC7ZL) Homepage
Thanks and 73,PeteAC7ZL
| ? |
| ? | | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? |
| The H.P. Friedrichs (AC7ZL) HomepageThe Homepage of H. P. Friedrichs |
| |
| View on www.hpfriedrichs.com | Preview by Yahoo |
| |
| ? |
Re: RT11 / RSTS-E games
I obviously have done something wrong when moving files about etc. Hence
depending on which way you get there, they may not link.
For now all the games I have are available here:
http://www.saracom.com/pdp11/pdp11.htm
thanks
Max
------------------------------ Message: 35 Date: Thu, 7 May 2015
19:42:52 -0400 From: Ethan Dicks <ethan.dicks at gmail.com> To: "General
Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts" <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Subject: Re: RT11 / RSTS-E games Message-ID:
<CAALmim=yauqgpg7hc_4vN=1d41WtEA=MPS0P8=4wjNav-4c3TA at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 5:34 PM,
Peter Coghlan <cctalk at beyondthepale.ie> wrote:
> Lyle Bickley wrote: Ethan Dicks <ethan.dicks at gmail.com> wrote: This one? Appears to be a bad link :(
Try http://pdp11.saracom.com/games/spcinv.zip [1] instead.
Nice catch.
Thanks!
-ethan
Links:
------
[1] http://pdp11.saracom.com/games/spcinv.zip
I have a Xerox 820-II with CP/M 2.2, monitor, dual disk drive, keyboard, daisy wheel printer, manuals, and cables. Wondering if anyone is interested in saving it from the dump, OBO. Bad news, I powered it up recently and the screen flickered and jumped for about 5 minutes before the wisp of smoke. The visible damage is a film capacitor on what looks like a power supply board in the monitor. Five years ago it powered up and was working as far as I could tell. Baltimore, Maryland area (USA). Not a list subscriber, will check list daily for a while, then weekly...
Dave
Anyone have any literature on the Vermont Research 5017?
It was a cartridge drive shipped from 1975 until 1985 probably rebadged and
sold under some system manufacturer's label. Most likely the first HDD to
use embedded servo in a production drive.
Tom
I just posted the winners for the Type ?n Run contest for April on RetroBattlestations. Lots of very interesting programs that people submitted. Entries came in for a variety of computers like the IBM PC, the BBC Micro, the TRS-80 CoCo, and even one for the Texas Instruments CC-40!
Check out all the entries, and maybe submit a program of your own! The Type ?n Run contest is an ongoing challenge with winners selected every month.
http://redd.it/35ht9w
--
Follow me on twitter: @FozzTexx
Check out my blog: http://insentricity.com
naw.... the card reader read punches and the reader driver made it
readable on your machine! !
there were some for hp-2000 also and ho 3000 we would love to find
one for the smecc museum here in az if anyone has an HP setup!
Ed Sharpe archivist for SMECC
In a message dated 5/10/2015 1:56:51 A.M. US Mountain Standard Time,
robert.jarratt at ntlworld.com writes:
I recall back in the late 70s using an IBM 029 Card Punch to punch cards
for
the DECSYSTEM-20.
As I understand it, the 029 was an EBCDIC machine, but of course the
DECSYSTEM-20 was ASCII.
Does that mean there was an ASCII version of the 029, or that there was
something in the card reader software on TOPS-20 that converted EBCDIC to
ASCII?
Regards
Rob
Just another video showing one of my units for anyone who might be
interested.
I was lucky to get this one in such a clean undamaged condition. It did
require some work to get it into shape for this video though. Bad solder
joints on the analogue board...it's almost a standard feature of these
machines, just like leaky caps in the later models!
Anyway...
https://youtu.be/v_m2sfcDDvg
Terry (Tez)
Chuck Guzis wrote:
Really great (7 track) drives; substantially over-engineered as compared
to, say, a 65x drive. The 604 wasn't quite as fast as the look=alike
607, but nothing to sneeze at. If you've got 160A, 3000-series or
6000-series machine (and associated controller), it'd be a really great
drive to have.
--Chuck
____________________________________________________________
These were great tape drives. The 604 was 75ips versus 150ips for the 607. Both drives were 200/556/800 bpi 7 track units.
The weight was a killer. But they were extremely reliable, easy to work on and easy to interface. Al has manuals on them (I know because I loaned them to him) and I have a lot spare parts if someone wanted to try to get them working.
These would be a good choice for recovering old 7 track tapes. They used vacuum tensioning columns and vacuum capstans. So very little contact with the magnetic slurry side of the tape.
Billy Pettit
Chuck Guzis wrote:
Really great (7 track) drives; substantially over-engineered as compared
to, say, a 65x drive. The 604 wasn't quite as fast as the look=alike
607, but nothing to sneeze at. If you've got 160A, 3000-series or
6000-series machine (and associated controller), it'd be a really great
drive to have.
--Chuck
____________________________________________________________
These were great tape drives. The 604 was 75ips versus 150ips for the 607. Both drives were 200/556/800 bpi 7 track units.
The weight was a killer. But they were extremely reliable, easy to work on and easy to interface. Al has manuals on them (I know because I loaned them to him) and I have a lot spare parts if someone wanted to try to get them working.
These would be a good choice for recovering old 7 track tapes. They used vacuum tensioning columns and vacuum capstans. So very little contact with the magnetic slurry side of the tape.
Billy Pettit