> Message: 26
> Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2013 18:49:25 -0400
> From: Ethan Dicks <ethan.dicks at gmail.com>
> To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts"
> <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
> Subject: Designing a replacement Alps Plotter drive gear (was Re:
> looking for Daisy Wheel Printer)
> Message-ID:
> <CAALmimn-amKc8rMuGmaua4hqmR527STr8B30qx_TJMPKSzr_Qg at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
[snip]
>
> Mention of the Alps plotter reminds me that we've had various discussions
> about all the plotter mechs with broken gears but we've never worked out
> the details on fabricating replacement gears. I've learned a lot about
> fabrication over the past couple of years, so I wanted to take another stab
> at the discussion to fill in the parts I don't (yet) understand...
>
> So I was looking at this gear generator...
>
> http://woodgears.ca/gear_cutting/template.html
>
> ... thinking that you can't fabricate a good replacement until you
> have the data on what you are replacing. I'd like to try to make
> either a flat (DXF) design file or a 3D (STL) design file of a
> gear replacement candidate. It's possible that with so few
> leaves (teeth) and such a small size (1/8" / 3mm across the
> face, 1/20" / 1.27mm shaft) that there will be fiddling for
> undercut, etc., but I wanted to at least make *something*
> that could be tried for good fit.
>
> So that web-based tool can make a bitmap image of a
> gear given the right data, but my own 2D CAD skills aren't
> honed enough to draft up a DXF of a gear. Is there anyone
> on the list here who is good with 2D CAD and has time
> to make an image of a gear? I'm fine with turning that into
> 3D and seeing how things would all turn out. I still have
> several broken plotters and would like to get them working
> again.
>
> Cheers,
>
> -ethan
Ethan,
I may be able to draw up a gear like this, but like the "gear
generator," I'd have to have the correct gear data to know what to
draw. I'm willing to try.
What specs should I try to draw a gear to? I have access to both 2D &
3D drafting/modeling software (AutoCAD & SolidWorks).
Do you intend to use a 3D printer to try to manufacture the gear?
I suppose these gears are spur gears with involute gear teeth.
What is the pressure angle?
What is the total number of teeth?
What is the pitch diameter?
You said the face width is 1/8-inch and the shaft hole fits a 1.27mm
diameter shaft.
Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gear) has all this info and
more -- I'm pretty sure that you are interested in only spur gears
right now, so you can skim over the other gear-type information on
that page.
Knowing the gear specs may even allow someone to go to the "small
gear" catalogs and maybe even be able to select an "off-the-shelf"
gear for each needed gear. It's possible.
Let me know,
Bob
At 09:35 AM 4/12/2013, John Foust wrote:
>The Rostenbach site says the original digitized material was at
>12 bits of gray, but that he worked with an 8 bit version.
I'm sorry - Rostenbach says the original was 9 bits, and that
he had a tape with those nine bits stored in twelve bits.
- John
On Thu, 11 Apr 2013 21:29:30 -0400, Ethan Dicks <ethan.dicks at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Mention of the Alps plotter reminds me that we've had various discussions
>>> about all the plotter mechs with broken gears but we've never worked out
>>> the details...
>
>> I may be able to draw up a gear like this, but like the "gear
>> generator," I'd have to have the correct gear data to know what to
>> draw.
>
> Understandable. If I had more numbers up front, I would have given them.
>
>> What specs should I try to draw a gear to? I have access to both 2D &
>> 3D drafting/modeling software (AutoCAD & SolidWorks).
>> Do you intend to use a 3D printer to try to manufacture the gear?
>
> I do not. I was contemplating trying to laser-cut some out of Delrin sheet,
> something I did not have access to the last time this conversation made
> its rounds. As before, FDM printers do not have the resolution for such
> a tiny part, and other technologies (sintered powder or UV-cured resin)
> are likely to be too brittle, especially with such fine features.
>
I didn't really think so (for the same reasons), but I haven't kept
up-to-date with today's additive manufacturing capabilities.
>> I suppose these gears are spur gears with involute gear teeth.
>
> As far as I know that is true.
>
>> What is the pressure angle?
>
> I do not know.
>
>> What is the total number of teeth?
>> What is the pitch diameter?
>
> I do not know without digging out a printer to check. I used to have
> 4MP close-up pictures (taken with my gear in 2003 back when
> Electronic Goldmine was surplusing the bare Alps printer mechs
> for a few dollars) but I don't know exactly where those photos
> are at the moment. My best approach right now would be to
> drop one on a high-res flatbed scanner (1200 dpi) to get a
> reasonable "to scale" picture, but I don't have a gear in front
> of me at the moment (I do have them in town).
>
If you find the photos or make the scans, please send them. If
possible, scan the gear next to something with a known scale such as a
6-inch machinist's scale or equal.
>> You said the face width is 1/8-inch and the shaft hole fits a 1.27mm
>> diameter shaft.
>
> That's what I've scraped from previous conversations about this
> gear. I now own a micrometer so with a gear in hand, I have
> a chance of confirming that to better accuracy.
>
>> Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gear) has all this info and
>> more -- I'm pretty sure that you are interested in only spur gears
>> right now, so you can skim over the other gear-type information on
>> that page.
>
> *nods*
>
>> Knowing the gear specs may even allow someone to go to the "small
>> gear" catalogs and maybe even be able to select an "off-the-shelf"
>> gear for each needed gear. It's possible.
>
> I think we (the cctalk community at the time) looked into that and nobody
> had such tiny gears with so few large teeth in their catalog.
Sounds like a "non-standard" gear. I can see why you (cctalk)
couldn't find one in a catalog.
> There were
> calls to remove a gear and make castings (most gears are already broken
> making that difficult) or using a lathe to make a fresh brass gear, etc.
> Someone apparently did take a stab at a homemade brass gear but
> declared it too expensive to warrant starting up a small run. Perhaps
> hobby CNC has evolved to the point now where one could do a gear
> with less labor and make an individually cut gear easily enough to
> justify selling it for around $5. Or not.
The hobby CNC world seems to have drastically increased in popularity
in the last few years. A lot of the (mostly) guys are retired now and
*may* be willing to make a small run for a reasonable cost just for
the challenge. We'd still have to be able to give them full specs so
they can program their machines. I recommend we wait on approaching
the hobby CNC community until the gear specs can be determined and you
have a go at the prototype with the laser.
>
> If I have a DXF or EPS of the face of the gear, I can see if the laser
> cutter can make an approximation out of Delrin for nearly free (I just
> spend a few minutes when I'm already working on a run and as long
> as I don't work past the quarter-hour billing tick on the tool, the time
> is already paid for by the other job). I'm not positive that this will
> work, but the cost is so low that it's worth a stab. Just need the
> silhouette to scale and I'm good to go.
>
> -ethan
Go ahead and measure what you can and send me the dimensions &
photos/scans. I'll see what I can put into DXF or EPS format for you.
Bob
At 06:06 PM 4/11/2013, Mike Loewen wrote:
> Internet sources state that the "Mona by the Numbers" image was done on a plotter. There is some info and a few links at the bottom of this page:
>http://rostenbach.com/mona/mona.htm
Yes, that's the one. I hadn't seen digitalmonalisa.com before.
It is owned by a Andrew Patros. Does anyone recognize his name
and know why he made it? At first I thought he was selling prints.
It says "Mona by the Numbers" was reproduced on a "diazo printing machine."
In the PDF on the site, it also says "Peterson used his EYE [a flying
spot scanner] to scan a 35mm slide of the Mona Lisa, and then, using
a specially designed character set, played the scan back onto a 30 inch
Cal Comp plotter. The 30 inch monochrome playback sparked a mini
collecting frenzy all over the country."
The Rostenbach site says the original digitized material was at
12 bits of gray, but that he worked with an 8 bit version.
Nelson's "Computer Lib" says each spot was 100 levels, which
makes me wonder if he wasn't misconstruing "percents" as levels.
So as I understand it, diazo was a copying technology that made copies
of the original plotter print. Does that account for the faded orange
color of the surviving prints?
<http://www.vintchip.com/DOCUMENTS/monanumbers/mona.html>http://www.vintchip.com/DOCUMENTS/monanumbers/mona.html has a nice closeup
of the bottom of an original. That site is kept by a Greg Barber.
I'd love to get an original. Does anyone recall them ever coming
up for sale?
Barring that, I'm tempted to recreate it in Illustrator so vector
reproductions could be made.
- John
I ran across some old computer art from the 1970's while sorting through
some old boxes in storage. It seems like nearly every computer lab and room
had a few posters hanging on the wall. As I recall, Snoopy was probably the
most popular subject along with "space stuff." I just had to piece these old
posters together and see what I had printed back in 1981. It turns out that
at least 2 of them were from the Princeton University Computer Center Clinic
and done by Samuel P. Harbison in 1973. The third one of the Golden Gate
Bridge is huge (8 ft. wide and 6.5 ft. tall) and no credits were given. Here
are some photos of them for those that are interested:
Golden Gate Bridge (with a PAA airplane) - 96" x 78":
http://www.solomonson.net/computers/GoldenGate.jpg
One Giant Leap (man on the moon) - 40" x 33":
http://www.solomonson.net/computers/GiantLeap.jpg
The Moon - 59" x 55":
http://www.solomonson.net/computers/Moon.jpg
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 4:20 PM, Tony Duell <ard at p850ug1.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>> One of those 4-colour pritner/ploters using the Alps mechanism. Everybody
>> >and his dog sold them at some poitn -- Tandy CGP115, Commodore 1520,
>> >there was an Atari oen, a Sharp one, theOric printer, etc.
>
> But that little Alps unit is somewhat odd, and IMHO deserves a place i na
> colleciton of hard copy peripherals.
Mention of the Alps plotter reminds me that we've had various discussions
about all the plotter mechs with broken gears but we've never worked out
the details on fabricating replacement gears. I've learned a lot about
fabrication over the past couple of years, so I wanted to take another stab
at the discussion to fill in the parts I don't (yet) understand...
So I was looking at this gear generator...
http://woodgears.ca/gear_cutting/template.html
... thinking that you can't fabricate a good replacement until you
have the data on what you are replacing. I'd like to try to make
either a flat (DXF) design file or a 3D (STL) design file of a
gear replacement candidate. It's possible that with so few
leaves (teeth) and such a small size (1/8" / 3mm across the
face, 1/20" / 1.27mm shaft) that there will be fiddling for
undercut, etc., but I wanted to at least make *something*
that could be tried for good fit.
So that web-based tool can make a bitmap image of a
gear given the right data, but my own 2D CAD skills aren't
honed enough to draft up a DXF of a gear. Is there anyone
on the list here who is good with 2D CAD and has time
to make an image of a gear? I'm fine with turning that into
3D and seeing how things would all turn out. I still have
several broken plotters and would like to get them working
again.
Cheers,
-ethan
The discussion thread about the flip chips had a discussion about a
spice model.
there is a file missing and I wonder if anyone knows where it might be found
thanks
JIm
.INCLUDE ../PDP8/PDP8_COMPONENTS.cir
Since my father passed away a couple of months ago I have been giving
serious thoguth to making a formal wil myself (when my father was around,
he would have known who to contact about various things).
My first ;'choice' is to give everything to a personal friend who has
been on this list. He shares enough of my interests that he will realise
what is valuable and what is perhaps not so valuable. But the problem is
tha said friend is about the same age as me, and it is not certainn he
wil loutlive me. Of course if he passes away long before me, I can
producve a new will, but it is worth putting a clause in the one I am
currently writing to say what happens if he is not around.
Now, as well as my classic computers there's also cmaeras, books, tools,
test gear, other electronci stuff, etc.
I would rather leave everything to one person/orgnaisation (rather than
say 'the classic computers go to <a>, the tools go to <b>, etc) or worse
still 'I leave my PDP11/45 system to <foo>', etc. In the latter case if I
have, say, swapped my 11/45 for an 11/790 at some point then <foo> gets
nothing, even though it was probably my intention that he would get the
11/70. In the former case, there could be disputes as to what category
certain things fall into -- is the 'Datacopy 300' (an early digital camera
that needs a classic PERQ to run it) a 'classic computer peripheral' or a
'camera', for example.
Does anyone have any serious suggestions for an organisation (and yes, I
am considering computer museums here, no matyter what I may have said i
nthe past) who would be prepared to take the lot and pass on that which
was of no use to them to other organisations or enthusiasts?
-tony
At 12:39 PM 4/11/2013, Sam O'nella wrote:
>http://www.vintage.org/exhibit99.html has a better picture of it from the
>now CHM.
"Better" as in that one is 320 x 240 pixels and mine was 122 x 184? :)
- John