http://theinquirer.net/inquirer/news/2261567/internet-archive-opens-its-sof…
?DIGITAL STORER the Internet Archive has opened its collected Archive
of Historical Computer Software, and the archivist who collected it
challenged anyone to match it.
The Software Archive is the work of professional archiver Jason Scott
and in a post to his website he boasted of the scale of the software
database and spoke of what a treasure trove of historical software it
is.?
--
Liam Proven ? Profile: http://lproven.livejournal.com/profile
Email: lproven at cix.co.uk ? GMail/G+/Twitter/Flickr/Facebook: lproven
MSN: lproven at hotmail.com ? Skype/AIM/Yahoo/LinkedIn: liamproven
Tel: +44 20-8685-0498 ? Cell: +44 7939-087884
At 05:13 PM 4/15/2013, Christopher Satterfield wrote:
>I actually know someone who uses a modern system to convert older audio
>formats to digital formats (usually FLAC). They also have a 1200dpi scanner
>(so old it's SCSI) they use for film or printed pictures. Works
>surprisingly well,
Some processes are better today. I recently had some old (1940s to '70s)
8 mm family movies scanned digitally.
The service cleans the film and uses a wet-gate process to reduce scratches.
They scan each frame digitally at HD resolution (1920 x 1080) using
even LED illumination. They scan the entire film edge-to-edge. Many
old cameras exposed the entire width of the film while the projector
only showed the majority of the middle, so you see more image than
ever before. I asked for a digital movie file for editing, so I sent
them a hard drive. The results are astoundingly dramatically better
>from what you got from an old projector. No playback jitter
>from worn sprocket holes. Bright, even illumination.
It's far better than the film-to-VHS transfer I paid for in the early 90s.
(Private YouTube example links available on request.) All this for a
dime or two per foot. I'll be able to edit digitally and provide
family members with DVD or Bluray copies.
The same is true for restoration and duplication of old family
photographs. With a digital process, you can undo damage and
easily multiply copies.
As with the classic computer avocation, it can come with regrets, too.
I wish I would've rescued 1930s family films from a distant cousin
who passed away a decade ago. I had a VHS copy of some of his films,
but not the originals.
- John
I've looked in all the usual places and can't find any manuals for the
D200 - does anyone have a scan?
I know there are manuals for the later D410 and D411 floating around -
but I would like to get some definitive details on the D200.
(Also - still looking for any help with the MV/2500...)
Steve
http://stephen.homedns.org/dg/
Tony Duell wrote:
> But I would also argue that nobody (or at least very few people) wil
> leb
> equally interested in hardware and software. If you are a hardware
> person, you will want to ru nthe real hardawre, you will want to laod
> the
> alignment pack and connect the 'scope to the read preamplifer. You
> will
> want to have a logic analyser conencted ot the CPU microcode address
> bus
> and wacch how it executes machine instructions.
>
Then I would be one of those very few. I find hardware and system
software (operating systems, database managers etc) equally interesting.
Actually, my view is that they are to a great extent two different
incarnations of the same thing: The hardware is a physical machine that
executes programs, the operating system is a kind of virtual machine
which executes user programs. Then there is virtual machine software,
that is also very interesting.
I wrote a very simple operating system once in my career, now I am
playing with writing another one in my spare time. Some day I will most
likely also design and built my own processor, whether with discrete
logic or an FPGA I am not sure, perhaps both.
And then the physical experience of an actual old machine running is
something special, quite like driving an old car or riding on a steam
train.
/Jonas
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 12:00 PM, <cctalk-request at classiccmp.org> wrote:
(much snipped)
You'd think by now I'd know better than to start a thread like this
while on digest mode. First, thank you to everyone who replied. I got
at least something out of every post so far and that's no small thing.
I must have misread something along the way as I thought the /23 had
separate I/D spaces. Good thing to have that correct now. I'd not mind
getting one to run it for it's own sake but to get it thinking it
could do something it couldn't would be much more annoying.
Thank you to the pointers to additional docs - the field guide as
especially nice to find as I'm still learning my way around the DEC
module names. The chassis information was quite helpful as well.
As for why, well...
I graduated HS in 1982 & took a short detour into the Army so I missed
a lot of the "glory days" of some of the things on this list. I
started with micros and as a student the closest I got allowed to the
Vax was a login prompt. The first (non DOS,OS/2,Windows) software
environment I really got to know well was Unix and then learning of
Lisp & LispM's. These days emulators are fun, capable and perfect for
most home users - I certainly would not have the room or power budget
for a CADR or PDP-10 or 11/780 in the basement! I respect those who
can but, alas, I'm not able to do that in my current rental
But I do have the room and enough of a toy budget to slowly put
together a classic PDP-11 system of the later /73, /83 or /93 type &
run the kind of software I'm familiar with on it. Might even try to
see if I can back port Franz lisp and to it from the 4.2 distribution
just to give myself a reason for it.
Ultimately I'd like to have a small collection of real classic
hardware - a Symbolics XL1200, a Vax (or Vaxstation) 4000 & a PDP-11.
I'll work on that last one for now and deal with emulation for the
rest :)
Thanks again to everyone,
William
--
Live like you will never die, love like you've never been hurt, dance
like no-one is watching.
Alex White
On 14 Apr 2013, at 23:59, "Tom Sparks" <tom_a_sparks at yahoo.com.au> wrote:
>
>>> I refuse to follow planned obsolescence.
>>> I also hate planned obsolescence
>> my X86's I buy newand keep retooling the software until they die
>
>Understandable.
>
>> my classic / remake systems (amiga, riscOS), I well upgrade/update them to a point
>> (I will not convert my desktop amigas to a tower)
>
>I bet you they'll outlive the x86s. ;)
>thats debatable,
the Operating system needs to abandon its ties to the older hardware
and become open source (RiscOS open / AROS )
if older software is need to be run emulation in the form of rosetta or wine can be used
apple inc has made thetransition through a group of cpus then there is hope
(6502 -> 68k -> PPC -> intel)
>> I am sickof products that use the Freebie marketing / razor and blades business model
>>
>> thats why I am buying older printers because I can buy the Consumables (stil-inbox) on ebay
>
>They'll outlive a new printer!
>its looking that way.......
>
>> tom
>>
>>
>
>
>
>On Apr 15, 2013, at 12:01 AM, Zane H. Healy wrote:
>
>> Also interesting is that it's the SF/Bay Area Craigslist, but the area code is Washington DC.? Photo's would have been nice.
>
>I live in Philadelphia and have a Baltimore area code.? Blame
>cell phones?
>
>
>- Dave
>
>On 14/04/13 11:24 PM, Cory Smelosky wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 14 Apr 2013, at 22:54, "Toby Thain"<toby at telegraphics.com.au>? wrote:
>> ...
>>> The dominant culture thinks nothing of discarding working, useful things. When it comes to electronics, it is fairly certain we junk far more stuff in perfect working order, than faulty stuff.
>>
>> That leaves us more to dumpster-dive for. ;)
>
>That's how I know it's true. But only a tiny part is meaningfully
>reused, recycled, or repaired.
>
>--T
>
>>
>>>
>>> Our only consolation is that one day, we will have to stop doing this. It's a very finite rope. And boy, will we feel dumb then.
>>>
>>> --Toby
>>>
>>>> or do without."? I just recently (three days ago) explained to someone
>>>> that taking a computer I was offering was actually doing me a favour,
>>>> because it lets me get rid of a machine without tripping my "aak!
>>>> throwing away working hardware!" issues.
>>>>
>>>> /~\ The ASCII??? ??? ??? ??? ? Mouse
>>>> \ / Ribbon Campaign
>>>>? X? Against HTML??? ??? mouse at rodents-montreal.org
>>>> / \ Email!??? ? ? 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39? 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>>> There is more to vintage computing than just software!!
>> I agree!!? Can you describe what is included in "more"?
>
>I don't have anything like a PDP-11.? The oldest machine I have is probably
>a BBC Micro and the biggest, noisiest machine I have is an Alphaserver 2100.
>
>> (a)? Extra noise
>
>I've been known to mess about with trying (not very successfully) to get a
>sound card to produce a 400Hz background whirr that comes and goes as I move
>around the room.? The sound of fans and disks does help create the right mood
>as long as it is not loud enough to be irritating.
>
>> (b)? Extra heat
>
>Not a problem in winter (except for the effect on system reliability).? More
>of a difficulty in summer.
>
>> (c)? Total cost is more
>
>Not necessarily.? I've paid at most nominal amounts for most if not all of my
>older equipment although I have sometimes had to invest a little more for the
>parts and peripherals I occasionally need.? I am not part of the crowd that
>collects old equipment hoping for it to increase in value.
>
>There would be an incremental cost to the world and the environment if I was to
>purchase hardware and software from companies producing the latest equipment
>and running the latest bugware.
>
>> (d)? Slower CPU
>
>If it's fast enough, I am not bothered by how much faster it could be.
>
>> (e)? Slower disk I/O
>
>Same.
>
>> (f)? Slower ethernet
>
>Same.
>
>> (g)? Less disk space
>
>I am fairly disorganised.? Less disk space gives me an incentive to keep
>things tidy and get rid of clutter.
>
>I am slightly more worried about reliability of old disk hardware. However,
>I've managed to keep ahead of the disks that have died on me so far.
>
>> (h)? Smell, touch and feel of original hardware
>
>I like the touch and feel of the original software as well as the hardware.
>If the hardware I want is not available and a good emulator is, I'll use
>the emulator to experience the software.? I'll still use something pretty old
>to run the emulator on though.
>
>Regards,
>Peter Coghlan.
>
>
>
>
Folks, I was an underbidder on the System/360 panel that recently went on
ebay.
This morning I received an obviously fake 'second chance' offer email.
The interesting part is that the sender had clearly done some research, as
ebay has not exposed your email address for many years, precisely to
prevent scams like this. Since my ebay ID is 'corestore_org' it's not too
hard to google and find an email address for me; they clearly did so, as
the email correctly associated my email address with my account name,
exactly as a genuine ebay email would.
I don't think anyone here would be taken in by such for an instant, but be
warned all the same; someone is being 'active' with scams tailored to our
interests. The email claimed to originate from 'ebay at ebay.joe211.info' and
sought a reply to 'jrengineer70 at gmail.com'.
EDIT a google reveals several other scam emails using this email address.
It never struck me before, but of course ebay doesn't even show underbidder
*account names* any more; they splash them with asterisks and display them
as x******x. Yet the scammer knew my full ebay ID, my correct email
address, AND the amount of my underbid. Someone *must* have cracked the
ebay database...
Mike
http://www.corestore.org
'No greater love hath a man than he lay down his life for his brother.
Not for millions, not for glory, not for fame.
For one person, in the dark, where no one will ever know or see.'