test-drb July 2012

test-drb@ccmp.vtda.org

196 participants
250 discussions

Start a nNew thread

potter pens.

by bfranchuk＠jetnet.ab.ca

I just noticed this ad about space pens. Will the same cartridges fit on the older plotter? http://www.spacepen.com/

12 years, 4 months

Composite Black and White monitor dead

by terry＠webweavers.co.nz

Hi Guys, I posted this note on Vintage Computer Forums, and thought I'd see if anyone could help here too. T actually an acceptable looking TRS-80 Model 1 monitor I snagged for $3 but I figure the principles are the same regardless. It's dead. No raster and no glow in the tube neck. The board does heat uo though and there is that smell of old electronics being startled awake after many years. I've done no tests yet, but I have Sam's Facts for the model 1, and they provide a troubleshooting guide for the monitor and say what voltages should be on cetain components. I suspect something to do with the AC power supply of maybe horizontal sweep. Some faulty power transistor maybe? What I would appreciate from anyone who knows, is a link to a page or doc which explains how composite B/W monitors work. The Sam's document is great >from the perspective of troubleshooting detail but it does assume you know, conceptually, just what's going on. I don't and I'd like to get some understanding before I start poking around. Incidently the SAM's fact PDF covers the 110V version while I have a 240V one. There are some differences, one of which is there appears to be no fuses in the AC circuits! Thanks Tez

12 years, 4 months

Finding a Honeywell 316?

by wackyvorlon＠me.com

My father worked in a mine in the '70s that was using a Honeywell 316 for process control. I was thinking it might be neat to see if I could track one down. What are they worth the days? How common are they? Sent from my iPad

12 years, 4 months

Looking for DEC VT125 Maintenance print sheets (since VK100 MP is AWOL)

by jgevaryahu＠gmail.com

Does anyone have a copy of the DEC VT125 Maintenance print sheet set? The mp sheets are DEC part number #MP-01053-00 These should hopefully be slightly easier to find than the VK100 MP sheets. These are needed for repairing a VK100 and for a project reverse-engineering how the hardware worked, since it turns out the VT125 uses an almost but not exactly identical state machine "engine" for drawing vectors to the VK100. This VT125 information should be extrapolatable to the VK100 hardware which preceded it. The Tech manual for the VT125 is on bitsavers as part of the VT100 Tech manual revision 3 ( http://www.bitsavers.org/pdf/dec/terminal/vt100/EK-VT100-TM-003_VT100_Techn… starting on page 6-70, pdf page 316) I'd be more than willing to scan (at high quality) or photocopy the MP sheets if anyone has a copy they could lend me. A good quality 11x17 1:1 photocopy of the originals is better than nothing, as long as the tiny labels on the schematics are still readable. (If all you have is a poor photocopy, though, let me know! A poor copy is better than no copy at all!) I am fine paying for shipping, handling, finding/digging out of a pile, etc. P.S. Does anyone have a VT125 and the means to dump the three code roms on it? I'd love to get my hands on a copy of those as well. P.P.S. Does anyone have a VT125 and a desoldering station/know-how to remove and dump the ?five? proms on it? They're not immediately necessary but it would be convenient to have copies of their data for the future and to help with potential repairs. P.P.P.S. If anyone has a not-installed VT100->VT125 upgrade kit which they are willing to sell, let me know off-list. -- Jonathan Gevaryahu jgevaryahu at gmail.com jgevaryahu at hotmail.com

12 years, 4 months

See the ENIAC in person - well, part of it anyway.

by gilcarrick＠gmail.com

The 3rd annual Vintage Computer Festival Southwest http://vintage.org/2012/southwest/ is this August 4th-5th. We will feature a tour of the Ross Perot collection http://mit-a.com/perotcollection.shtml of vintage computing, including several sections of the original ENIAC computer. ? We will also be adding a special tour of the Cowboy Stadium IT infrastructure. http://mit-a.com/CowboyStadiumTour.shtml The regular tour lasts an hour and a half - this one will run slightly longer. The group tours cost $20 and everyone says it is definitely worth it. We will need to have at least 15 or so people for this tour, and will need to sign up (and pay) in advance.? ? The VCF SW 3.0 will be at UT Arlington. http://www.uta.edu/uta/ More exhibitors, vendors, and speakers are registering frequently, so check the website. We are still looking for exhibitors, vendors, and volunteers (who get to attend free.) Gil -- A. G. (Gil) Carrick Director Museum of Information Technology at Arlington 1012 Portofino Drive Arlington, TX 76012 817-264-MITA (6482) - gil.carrick (Skype) http://MIT-A.com

12 years, 4 months

Microsoft licensing

by saquinn624＠aol.com

Richard writes: Wrong. As long as you have the certificate of authenticity for copies of MS-DOS, you can continue to ship product using that operating system. Medical device manufacturers are doing this because if they change the operating system, they have to requalify their devices which is a very expensive process. So they continue to buy NOS copies of MS-DOS, as long as they have the certificate of authenticity, and use those to ship their products. They will continue to do this as long as the cost of obtaining NOS MS-DOS product is less than the recertification process. Given the number of NOS copies still in the marketplace, they won't need to upgrade the OS for some time. There is a local guy who mostly deals in C=64 equipment that has been making quite a nice side business of finding NOS copies of MS-DOS for some time now. You would think so, wouldn't you, but as I said before Microsoft is being very creative. The software that you're talking about is unused, possibly retail or possibly OEM, but in any case the license has not been attached so it can be used on any device (for OEM, provided that the equipment is new). You would think that an OEM license, since it is attached permanently to the hardware, would transfer with the hardware, right? You would think that presenting the certificate of authenticity or other evidence that the hardware was licensed would be enough to show a license, right? Not so fast. A couple of years ago MS, upon a closer reading of the license agreement, noted the part that says that all copies must be transferred when the license transfers. Most people understood (and probably understand) this to mean that you can't keep any copies because there's only one license, but MS reinterpreted it to mean that if all copies are not transferred then it is not a valid license transfer and the license is invalidated, requiring a new license transfer. They set up a new "Refurbisher Program," whereby people selling used computers can give Microsoft more money to make sure nothing bad happens to their nice business. In an interesting twist, the now "meaningless" original "Certificate of Authenticity" must still be present, otherwise you need to cough up the full retail price should you want Windows - thus, per MS, the computer product the license is tied to is the mainboard (which cannot be replaced unless in cases of failure, when MS may choose to make an exemption if they really feel like it), the COA, and any manufacturer provided backup media, including the "recovery partition" of a disk which, if it is damaged, now appears to nuke your license for Windows. At this point they only seem to be targeting used computer stores selling machines with Windows, but until someone takes them to court and wins it could be anyone they want to squeeze. As noted, one copy of MS-DOS is probably not going to be a big deal, but MS appears to not be taking the "live and let live -after all we've already been paid" attitude and it might get worse. I found all of this out because of the good part of the program - MS will give really cheap upgrade licenses to qualifying nonprofits using used computers through the same program. Want to check it out? Search MS for "refurbisher program"

12 years, 4 months

IBM 7090 mainframe!

by peter＠vanpeborgh.eu

Does anyone know (of) anyone running/restoring an IBM 7090, early 60s vintage? I am about to clear out a friend's collection of vintage computer bits and I may find relevant modules and documentation, h/w and s/w. peter || | | | | | | | | Peter Van Peborgh 62 St Mary's Rise Writhlington Radstock Somerset BA3 3PD UK 01761 439 234 || | | | | | | | |

12 years, 4 months

cctech Digest, Vol 107, Issue 47

by jonas＠otter.se

On Sun, 29 Jul 2012 18:48:32 +0100 (BST), ard at p850ug1.demon.co.uk (Tony Duell) wrote: > Incidnetaslly, I never met a school maths or physics teacher who realsied > that. I must say I cannot understand how you succeeded in getting such universally and consistently incompetent teachers. During my year in the UK in the 5th form, *all* of my teachers were intelligent, clueful, helpful and sensible. Admittedly, it was a private school (not one of the expensive and fashionable ones) and may have been able to recruit better teachers. I don't know if the state schools are generally bad or not. /Jonas

12 years, 4 months

PDP11/05 front panel switch

by iamcamiel＠gmail.com

Hi Again, While I'm still struggling with the powers supply in the /84, I decided to also take a good look at the /05. Amazingly, the power supplies on this one (1972) are 13 years older than those on the /84 (1985), yet their outputs look absolutely perfect. Plugged in the cards, and it seems to work, apart from one annoying little thing: one of the front panel switches is bad. I noticed it when I was depositing, then reading back some data, then took a multimeter to determine that it's the switch itself that's broken. Cosmetically it looks ok, but it doesn't work. It's just one of the address/data switches, all other switches work fine. Are there any replacements for these switches to be found? Camiel.

12 years, 4 months

cctech Digest, Vol 107, Issue 47

by jonas＠otter.se

On Sun, 29 Jul 2012 16:58:16 -0700 (PDT), Fred Cisin <cisin at xenosoft.com> wrote: > Except that it's MODE.COM (.EXE? (gotta check a copy sometime, and see > what the first two bytes are!)) contained [EGA,CGA] options that are > inapplicable for video boards other than the Compaq ones (that had an > internal and an external video). Do you mean "its MODE.COM contained options blabla"? /Jonas

12 years, 4 months

← Newer
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
...
25
Older →

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

test-drb July 2012