Of the nine variants of KED developed by DEC, it seems
doubtful that either K52 or K62 are in use at this point.
I have mentioned in the past that a new variant, K42, which
now supports a VT420 with 48 lines is available. Inspection
of the code for K42 suggests that improvements can be made
with respect to the allocation of memory. In particular, while
K42.SAV is LINKed to execute under an Unmapped RT-11
Monitor, for versions of RT-11 which include VBGEXE, virtual
memory can be used under a Mapped Monitor. These same
improvements to K42 can also be added to K52 and K62 so
that if these variants are executed under a Mapped Monitor,
more efficient use can be made of the available memory. One
of the improvements can be an increase in the size of the cut
and paste buffer.
If no one still uses a VT52 or a VT62 terminal, then there does
not seem to be any point to including these improvements in
K52 and K62. Please respond if there is any interest to actually
use K52 or K62 under a Mapped RT-11 Monitor.
Jerome Fine
Hello, all,
I have a Tektronix 4052 Graphic Computer that I believe is in workable condition, but the old Mostek MK36xxx-series mask-programmed ROM that holds the operating firmware for the machine have failed, which is apparently a common occurrence for these devices. I have found numerous mention of these ROMs having been used in test equipment that "forget" after 10 to 15 years after production. I found the archive of 4052 firmware on Bitsavers, but am wondering if anyone out there has any suggestions as to what to do to replace the failed ROM with something of more current technology that will work. The firmware consists of 64K bytes of code. The Mostek ROMs are 24 pin devices, 5V supply, that use a clocked chip select signal, meaning that any replacement will have to emulate the clocking access scheme. There were Motorola-made programmable devices that could directly replace the Mostek parts, but these seem to be virtually unobtainable today..and even if I could find 8 of them, I don't have anything that could program them. Any other 8K x 8 ROM is in a 28 pin package, which would require some clumsy adapters to work. Along with the ROM itself, the 4052 had a unique ROMpatch implementation that allowed up to 48 ROM locations to be ''patched' in real time, and this involved a PLA device that did the address matching, and a fast bipolar ROM that contained that data to be substituted at the location to be patched. Duplicating the patched code could also prove to be very difficult. I am wondering if anyone out there may have run into the same situation with a 4052 and came up with a solution. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Rick
I have a complete VT14 (except for possibly the cover screws) 14/30,
14/35, and a lot of options available for serious inquires. It was
going to be a project down the road, but I need to shorten my list due
to health issues,
Does any else out there have one, or even know of one?
Please feel free to contact me off list.
Thanks, Paul
This 9000/350 was Stan Sieler's, IIRC, and passed through an intermediary who
couldn't maintain space for it, so I ended up with it and I put it in storage
until I could get space myself. Now that I have space, Homer is resurrected.
It is a 9000/350 (25MHz '020 + '881), 16MB RAM, 670MB main drive, HP-UX 8.0.
And I still have 10b2 on my 10MBit backbone, so it plugged right in.
http://www.floodgap.com/iv/1572
Testing the CPU (Homer doll came with it)
http://www.floodgap.com/iv/1573
Self-test
http://www.floodgap.com/iv/1575
Bringing up HP-UX
http://www.floodgap.com/iv/1574
Old school X11 as God intended
http://www.floodgap.com/iv/1576
Obligatory rear shot
I figure Stan will enjoy seeing it's still out there and operational.
--
------------------------------------ personal: http://www.cameronkaiser.com/ --
Cameron Kaiser * Floodgap Systems * www.floodgap.com * ckaiser at floodgap.com
-- The best defense against logic is ignorance. -------------------------------
Hi.
I'm looking for any information related to Z80 CPU internals,
microcode, sequencer, etc.
Is it possible to rebuild it in Verilog/VHDL/TTL on breadboard with
all that undocumented instructions, etc?
Here is what I found so far about machine cycles, but obviously, it's
not enough:
http://www.msxarchive.nl/pub/msx/mirrors/msx2.com/zaks/z80prg02.htm
I am doing my once a decade or so clean up and sorting. I have found working
distribution diskettes of the shareware software PC-Write and PC-File. I
had to break-out a 5.25 inch drive to read these. My 2005 vintage XP machine
only support on drive at a time so I have to open the case and hook up the
5.25 inch drive.
I have transferred these disks to my network drive and have tested them on a
Windows 98 laptop. I also have Norton Utilities and various copies of DOS
going back to version 1.1. (Complete with packaging.) If there are any
vintage PC users here I can email copies of the disk contents. Is there a
program that makes an "ISO" type file of a bootable floppy?
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:PC_Write_text_editor.png
Michael Holley
Andrew, Ive never seen its schematic, but the Apollo mobo I have is the most basic 030 Ive seen. Granted Ive really only gawked at Macs. Ill need to pull it out of storage. The only feature that stood out is a big ugly black chip that one might suspect was a mmu. It is a big mobo though. Maybe someone else can chime in.
----- Original Message:
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 10:53:01 -0700
From: Al Kossow <aek at bitsavers.org>
On 6/20/12 10:44 AM, Stan Sieler wrote:
>> thanks for the kind offer! If Bob declines, I'll let you know.
> CHM is interested, since apparently we have one.
------ Reply:
Excellent; I assume that if they go to you there would be a way for someone
who might need one to get a physical copy?
m
Original Message:
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 16:50:56 -0700
From: Stan Sieler <ss at allegro.com>
> hi,
> I found a box of paper tape software for an unknown computer (possibly a
> "L8" or "L8/9"?)
> ... and it's looking for a home (cost of mailing):
> If anyone can suggest what computer it's from, I'm curious!
> Stan
----- Reply:
Hi Stan,
Those are firmware and utility tapes for Burroughs series L8000 and L9000
computers, the predecessors of the B80 and B90 series and fairly rare since
they were dismissed as mere 'accounting machines' and not considered
collectible by purists and people without storage buildings:
http://www.picklesnet.com/burroughs/gallery/bpgltc.htm
Several museums have one and last I heard Bob Rosenbloom also had an L9000,
as well as an L5000; I imagine he would be delighted to have those tapes and
might even need one or two since I doubt that there are more than a handful
of those tapes left in the world and some of them are crucial to the
machine's operation.
If by any chance there are no other takers I'd gladly take care of them for
you and posterity.
m