> Date: Sat, 26 May 2012 15:53:35 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Mr Ian Primus <ian_primus at yahoo.com>
> To: cctalk at classiccmp.org
> Subject: PDP-11/05 Control (M7261) won't deposit
> Message-ID:
> <1338072815.56383.YahooMailClassic at web121606.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> Working on a PDP-11/05. The front panel appears to work, I can step through and examine addresses in memory, and I can run the CPU and halt it. Deposit, however, does NOT work. When the deposit switch is flipped, the LED's show the correct value, but examining the address again shows no change to memory.
>
> I know that this board is the problem, having swapped in a module from a working computer. I can, with the good board, toggle a test program into core. Then, shut it off, switch in the bad board, and the program (still in core) runs, and I can examine all areas of memory and see it correctly.
>
> I've only begun to glance at the schematics for the control board, but I would assume there is some kind of write buffer that's not working correctly. I'm going to continue to try to figure this out, but without a card extender, it's very difficult to troubleshoot
>
Well, it is not likely to be the buffer (register) as this would require
16 bad FF's. Does the address
increment when you hit deposit? If so, that means the switch is being
sensed. So, the problem
is likely the write command is not getting to the memory. There are a
bunch of ways to
make a front panel work, but since this is a raw logic machine (no
microcode) they probably
worked hard to minimize the logic needed. So, probably the deposit and
exam logic
share a lot of functions, but there is probably a FF that is set for
deposit and cleared
for exam, and then feeds through some gates to perform the memory read
or write.
Something in that chain of logic is most likely where the problem is.
Jon
Hello.
I have an UC08/III, the quad QBUS board with two SCSI controllers,
with metal panel for MicroVAX).
I would try to convert it to a plain UC08, the version for LSI11
without the metal panel.
The doubt is about the electrical compatibility: if I could remove the
panel and solder in place the 50pin berg connectors,
the card could work on a PDP11 in MSCP / TMSCP?
Andrea
Hey folks. I'm looking for a DEC H9281 backplane, the four-slot, dual
width one with screw terminals for power. Does anyone have one lying
around that they can part with?
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA
On 2012-05-17 10:00, Holm Tiffe<holm at freibergnet.de> wrote:
> Hi,
> does someone has a newer firmware Version for the UC07 as G143R?
>
> I have a double UC07 in my 11/83 and have problems to get Disks
> with 4Gbytes working. (DCAS-34330 50 pin). I have an Conner CFP2107S
> wich has 2 Gigabytes, I can split the drive and successfully format
> the resulting drives with XXDP or RT11. When I connect the 4GB Disks, even
> when I fake the geometry to 2Gbytes, the controller successfully formts and
> thest the drives, but an init du0: from updat in xxdp doesn't come back.
> same with mdup.mu from an RT11 tape. It simply hangs.
>
> Disk space isn't the concern why I'm trying to use the IBM drives, those
> disk are quiet comparing to the conner 2107s, that is what I want.
>
> Any Ideas?
Sounds like there is nothing wrong with your controller. I would suspect
the software have problems with such large disks... Not that uncommon
actually. It wasn't until RSX-11M-PLUS V4.6 that RSX correctly handles
disks larger than the max capacity of the OS (which is 8GB for RSX, by
the way, but most other OSes have smaller maxes).
Johnny
...Preferably from Data General.
Guys, does anyone out there have some of these? I am a collector and ex-DG employee and would really like to have one or two of these for my collection. Price negotiable...
Many thanks,
peter
|| | | | | | | | |
Peter Van Peborgh
62 St Mary's Rise
Writhlington Radstock
Somerset BA3 3PD
UK
01761 439 234
|| | | | | | | | |
> From:?"J. David Bryan" <jdbryan at acm.org>
> Date:?Sat, 26 May 2012 00:38:37 -0400
> Subject:?Re: HP 3000 micro gx booting MPE/V, Help >>>>
> The HP Computer Museum appears to have MPE FOS images available:
> ?http://hpmuseum.net/exhibit.php?swc=22
>
> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?-- Dave
The RICM has an HP 3000 Series 70. Will this OS run on the Series 70?
http://www.ricomputermuseum.org/Home/equipment/hp3000-series-70
--
Michael Thompson
As much as I would love a pdp-8/m, and as much as I'll probably kick myself for not calling about this, the expense of buying it, crating it, and having it shipped it to California would just more than I care to take on right now. If this were west of the Rocky Mountains, it would already be in my car :)
I have no more info than what's in the post. I don't know what "worse for wear" means in this case, but I hope it's not too beaten up.
http://washingtondc.craigslist.org/nva/sys/3030206025.html
-Seth
A question of nettiquette for the list :)
If I had a question regarding the VAX POLY instruction and
alternatives for post CVAX processors which I think might be relevant
to cctech at classiccmp.org and port-vax at netbsd.org would it be
considered port manners to cross post to both? :)
(Or would cctalk@ && port-vax@ be a better cross post if any?)
Thanks
Any Hp Mpe folks left out there
I have non working 3000/37s with possibly good drives and a 3000 micro GX
that works but has a bad drive. I have tried to boot the micro GX from the
3000-37 drives and get this far.
----------------------------------------
Cold Boot >
HP 32033G.B2.02
Performing a Coldstart
Following Volumes not found
MH7957U1
List Volume tables ?
----------------------------
Seems to freeze after that. It does this on 2 different drives.
Is this even possible to do ???
Does anyone have a OS tape for one of these ??? and which manuals
cover the boot menu and/or startup.
I would like to get both going but the 3000-37's have dead mother boards.
Stan Sieler, are you still around. Seems like every search I do comes up with
your name and advice.
Thanks, Jerry
Jerry Wright
g-wright at att.net
On Tue, 22 May 2012 19:31:10 +0100 (BST), ard at p850ug1.demon.co.uk (Tony
Duell) wrote:
> I personally find it ridiculaor that people are suggesting that something
> like a paper tape reader, for which the mechanical parts could be made in
> any model engineer's workshop and the electronics is a handful of parts
> should be emulated by a scanner (many moe photodetectors than necessary
> and a powerful processor to prewcess the images from said scanner. Please
> stop trhwing silicon ant the problem!
Am I completely wrong if I think I remember that the sprocket holes have
a fixed relationship to the data holes? If so, it ought to be possible
to build an optical decoder, illuminate it with a simple light bulb,
connect it to an input-capable parallel port on a computer with suitable
software, and simply pull the tape through by hand? The sprocket holes
would function as a clock for the data.
Agreed it is rather primitive, but for a one-off job of not too much
tape it could be less work than messing around with a scanner.
/Jonas