Thanks Rick
I'll get the CPU manual from bitsavers.
Rod
-----Original Message-----
From: cctech-bounces at classiccmp.org
[mailto:cctech-bounces at classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Rick Murphy
Sent: 06 June 2007 11:49
To: cctalk at classiccmp.org
Subject: Re: New DEC problem
At 04:43 AM 6/4/2007, Rod Smallwood wrote:
>Hi
> And now something for all you Decsperts to get your teeth into.
>My VAX4000-300 is failing the self test.
>
>After selecting the language it counts down to 10 and then fails test
>C5.
>
>Does anybody know what test C5 tests.
>If its an unterminated DSSI bus thats OK anything else could be a
>problem.
According to the KA670 Tech Manual (EK-KA670-TM, it's on bitsavers.) the
C5 diagnostic is for the system support chip. I don't know if an
unterminated DSSI will cause this, but it's plausible.
Hopefully this additional information will elicit a more helpful reply.
-Rick
Hi
Thanks for the positive feed back. Needless to say like all standards
S100 had different versions.
For example the Northstar Horizion had some active components on the
mother board.
However if we look at a basic passive (other than power) back plane.
What are the potential problems? Firstly the connectors are they
available? They had two rows of fifty connections.
Spacing pin to pin .125in. Mother board was thicker than the usual 1/16
in for rigidity possibily 3/32 in.
Card guides pretty standard but how high? Then the metalwork supporting
the card guides.
Possible Parts List
1. Double sided S100 motherboard (Say twelve slots)
2. Aluminium base plate drilled for backplane and card guide
supports.
3. Twelve double sided 2x50 edge connectors.
4. Card guide support frame.
5. Twenty four card guides.
6. Nuts, bolts and screws etc.
Rod Smallwood
-----Original Message-----
From: cctech-bounces at classiccmp.org
[mailto:cctech-bounces at classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Dan
Sent: 03 June 2007 12:59
To: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
Subject: Re: New pcb design for S-100 prototype board available
Rod,
I see what you mean. I'm just starting off small right now since it's
mainly a hobby. It's mostly to support the existing vintage computers
out there. I really don't know what the demand there is for a new S-100
chassis. I suppose that might be a good kit to build with the right
parts. I can look into this.
=Dan
[ My Corner of Cyberspace http://ragooman.home.comcast.net/ ]
Rod Smallwood wrote:
> Prototype boards are nice but whats really needed is an S100 card cage
with back plane and PSU.
> Its normal to build the foundations before the rest of the house!!
>
> Rod Smallwood
>
>
At 04:43 AM 6/4/2007, Rod Smallwood wrote:
>Hi
> And now something for all you Decsperts to get your teeth into.
>My VAX4000-300 is failing the self test.
>
>After selecting the language it counts down to 10 and then fails test
>C5.
>
>Does anybody know what test C5 tests.
>If its an unterminated DSSI bus thats OK anything else could be a
>problem.
According to the KA670 Tech Manual (EK-KA670-TM, it's on bitsavers.)
the C5 diagnostic is for the system support chip. I don't know if an
unterminated DSSI will cause this, but it's plausible.
Hopefully this additional information will elicit a more helpful reply.
-Rick
Have a few AT&T terminals free for local pickup.
I'm located in Kent, Wa. South of Seattle. These have been
tested.
Models 513 and 615. include keyboards (80's vintage)
-Jerry
Jerry Wright
g-wright at att.net
Hi
It would appear we are saying the same thing.
It looks like I got reasonably close and you are confiming that
I'll also take it that my interpretation of the relative positions in
the OSI model etc. are OK.
You imply this anyway.
Would you mind answering one or two DECnet questions?
Regards
Rod
-----Original Message-----
From: cctech-bounces at classiccmp.org
[mailto:cctech-bounces at classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of dave at mitton.com
Sent: 06 June 2007 00:30
To: cctech at classiccmp.org
Subject: Re: DECnet and MOP
>Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 02:32:54 +0100
>From: "Rod Smallwood" <RodSmallwood at mail.ediconsulting.co.uk>
> Subject: RE: Repairing the damage.
> To: "General Discussion: On-Topic Posts Only" <cctech at classiccmp.
org>
>
...
>I probably failed to make my self clear.
>
> 1. Yes MOP is part of a whole heap of programs that go to make up
> DECNET
>
> 2. MOP stands for Maintenance Operations Protocol and that
> what is was for.
>
> 3 It pre dates DECnet (Well at lest internally in DEC)
MOP is part of the DECnet architecture set, and like DECnet has gone
through a number of versions, and releases. It actually underwent a
boom in the later years, as Ethernet got cheap and diskless network
devices became attractive.
It is a simple lower level datagram protocol, and does not need the
normal session stack to run. In smarter network devices, a MOP
bootstrap can be in the device ROM.
All that said; architecture, implementation, and deployment vary with
platforms and time.
For those that grew up on TCP/IP only (and thus doomed to repeat the
past), it is best to think of MOP as the DECnet analog of BOOTP, with a
little bit of DHCP and ARP sprinkled in.
...
> 8. Its twenty-five years since I was a product manager in DEC SWS. No
> wonder I'm a bit hazy on this stuff!
>
> Regards
> Rod Smallwood
There's your problem. I was a software engineer for DECnet-RSX,
DECnet-PRO, DECnet-DOS, and PATHWorks. I was also the architect of the
DAP Protocol v6 and a DECnet Token Ring Datalink. The later included
MOP specfications too.
I still have copies of all the Phase IV era DNA specs.
Dave.
Had a Symbolics 3640 dropped off on Sunday evening along with a Symbolics
model OP36-DISP display. Missing are the keyboard, FD, and all the needed
cables (power cord also). I opened the front door and saw two hard drives
mounted inside. Will also be looking for manuals and some software. Anyone
would information please email me.
Thanks John
Hi
Well done that guy!!
What you have done is both the spirit and the essence of classic
computing.
You are to be congratulated on both effort and persistence.
"A shining light to lead others into the darkness of old computer
restoration"
I was at DEC (UK) in the 70's and Modcomp would pop up as competition
>from time to time.
Hasn't that front panel got DEC overtones?
Is there a keyboard terminal or screen with it?
Rod Smallwood
DecCollector
-----Original Message-----
From: cctech-bounces at classiccmp.org
[mailto:cctech-bounces at classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Lyle Bickley
Sent: 05 June 2007 05:07
To: General Discussion: On-Topic Posts Only
Subject: MODCOMP II Rescue Revisited...
A number of you probably remember me "announcing" in Jan, 2007 that I
had rescued a MODCOMP II/12 from a lab here in Silicon Valley. The link
for that is below (sorry, it's slow - the pictures are large).
http://bickleywest.com/modcomp.htm
After a lot of work cleaning up both the CPU and I/O chassis I began
checking out the system. It turned out that the I/O chassis was in
pretty bad shape.
I went back to the lab facility where I found the MODCOMP II - looked
through several more buildings - and found another lone MODCOMP II I/O
chassis. I went through the "salvage" process again - and finally picked
it up about a month ago.
It was in a lot better shape than the original I/O unit. And the really
great news - it was an identical configuration to my original I/O
chassis.
After cleaning it up, doing all the usual capacitor, power supply
checking - I powered it up - and everything "looked" good - and no bad
"cooking"
smells ;-)
I cabled up the CPU and I/O unit, powered 'em up - and to my amazement
the front panel controls seemed to work O.K.
I then did the usual hand memory tests - and core memory worked O.K.
every location I tested.
I then wrote a bunch of small diagnostics (in machine code) - and found
that I/O was not easy to code - but I did enough to check that the
console in/out ports worked O.K.
Today I loaded diagnostic monitors, and diags - and most of the system -
including I/O is working! The really good news is that all 64K (words)
of core memory passed the long manufacturing memory diagnostic - which
even tests for "hot cores" failing.
It's been months in the making this critter come alive - but it sure
feels great when the diagnostics tell you that you are on the right
track :-)
Cheers,
Lyle
--
Lyle Bickley
Bickley Consulting West Inc.
Mountain View, CA
http://bickleywest.com
"Black holes are where God is dividing by zero"
http://cgi.ebay.com/IDE-Controller-for-Hard-Drive-KS-4-16-Bit-ISA-1989_W0QQ…
Anyone have one of these they'd like to sell? I ain't
paying $50 though. Funny "Joe" seems to think generic
Taiwanese stuff should command that kind of value. And
he has a lot of it up for bidding, all priced in a
similar outrageous fashion.
____________________________________________________________________________________Ready for the edge of your seat?
Check out tonight's top picks on Yahoo! TV.
http://tv.yahoo.com/
Hi,
I recently came into possession of a vintage video card apparently for
a NuBus Mac II. Can anyone help identify it? I do not have a Mac so I
cannot plug it into anything.
It is a two card video board from Rasterops with an apparent NuBus
connector. The boards both say "RASTEROPS CORP MADE IN U.S.A."
The main board says "(C) 1987" and the daughterboard says "(C) 1988"
The back of the main card says "P.C.B. 0001-0013 REV. XB1"
The back of the daughter card says "P.C.B. 0001-0019 REV. 01"
There are no visible FCC IDs anywhere on the card but may be buried
under the circuitry. I have not disassembled the card.
Here are some photos of the card. ?Any information would be
appreciated, even confirming what Mac II NuBus video card this model
is NOT would be helpful. ?Based on an earlier post on
"comp.sys.mac.graphics" with responses and some clues, I suspect it to
be a RasterOps 24L card cannot confirm it.
http://www.geocities.com/lynchaj/img_3023.jpghttp://www.geocities.com/lynchaj/img_3024.jpghttp://www.geocities.com/lynchaj/img_3025.jpg
Thanks in advance!
Andrew Lynch
Hi
And now something for all you Decsperts to get your teeth into.
My VAX4000-300 is failing the self test.
After selecting the language it counts down to 10 and then fails test
C5.
Does anybody know what test C5 tests.
If its an unterminated DSSI bus thats OK anything else could be a
problem.
Rod Smallwood