--- arcarlini at iee.org wrote:
> Tony Duell wrote:
>
> > However, 'What is an instruction?'. I've heard i
t
> said that the 11/780
> > averaged 500,000 of its machine instructions per
> second, but that that
> > was about as much processing as 10^6 of other
> machine's instructions
>
> The VAX-11/780 cranked out about as many Dhrystone
s
> as an
> IBM System/370 158 which did (apparently) chew
> through about
> one million instructions per second.
>
**>> snip <<**
> Antonio
>
Speaking of Dhrystones.... what is one?
Also, what does the MHz, or GHz, measure
exactly?
I understand MIPS (Million Instructions Per
Second), FLOPS (Floating-point Operations Per
Second) and G-FLOPS (Giga-FLOPS) but the
aforementioned two are a mystery to me.
Regards,
Andrew D. Burton
aliensrcooluk at yahoo.co.uk
Just a thank-you to the list. I accidentally broke the top to a very
nice filing box I've been using for years (it was designed for
floppies, I think, but I now use it for paper - 8" floppies, I suspect,
since an 8?" paper sheet just barely fits).
Turns out acetone dissolves the plastic, and I was able to solvent-weld
the pieces back together with acetone. I let it dry over the weekend
and now it is all good.
But I never would have thought to try that without all the discussions
of such things here on the list. Hence the thanks. Neat the ways
knowledge finds unexpected application!
/~\ The ASCII der Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTML mouse at rodents.montreal.qc.ca
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B
>
>Subject: SWTPc 6800 vs. Altair 680
> From: "B. Degnan" <billdeg at degnanco.net>
> Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 15:59:40 -0500
> To: cctech at classiccmp.org
>
>Are the programs from the SWTPc 6800 interchangeable with the Altair 680?
>Is there a good web reference that compares these two?
>
Yes [it is a 6800 is both cases] and no [they are not identical for io
or memory maps]. Depends on the IO and where the program runs in memory
as they have slightly different memeory maps. Also if memory serves
the 680 used a differnt monitor program than SWTP so any program that
uses the monitor for IO or other routines are iffy.
Allison
Al wrote:
> "Hex Star" stands out like a sore thumb. Everyone else
> on this list uses their real name, not a "handle".
There's a couple of respected folks here using
handles but they've been doing so for at least a decade.
The concept of "screen names" has some "classic"
elements esp. w.r.t BBS's (some legit uses) and
phreaking (completely non-legit but somewhat
respectable in a techie sense.)
I grew up not with BBS's but with E-mail lists and Usenet
and had used my real name there enough that the only
time I use a screen name is when I want to hide who I am,
something only rarely done.
Before that, it was ham radio, where using a real
call sign instead of a "handle" was a way of differentiating
the hobby from CB and trying to get some respect.
Tim.
There is a product called Cyanopoxy that was written up in the model railroad press a few years ago. It can bond materials such as nylon and delrin. I haven't tried it myself, but the reviews are favorable. It is fairly expensive, though. The link is: http://www.coolchem.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=cyanopoxy.
Bob
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Message: 16
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 14:45:40 -0600 (CST)
From: Tothwolf <tothwolf at concentric.net>
Subject: Re: Thank you, list!
To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts"
<cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0702141442220.10748 at host10.invalid.domain>
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
On Tue, 13 Feb 2007, John Robertson wrote:
> At 1:40 PM -0800 2/13/07, Chuck Guzis wrote:
>>
>> Great that it worked for you, but be advised that acetone will also (in
>> my experience) turn some plastics into grainy mush, so it's not a
>> universal solution for plastics.
>
> Yes, methylene chloride is the proper plastic solvent for styrene types.
> Plexiglass, Lexan, and many plastics will soften with this, and bond
> almost instantly. Hold for a few seconds to set, then let sit overnight
> to reach maximum hardness. Doesn't dissolve the plastic other than at
> the contact point. This is the stuff they use in plastic shops...along
> with some other solvents.
Has anyone found a solvent that will solidly weld the PC+ABS blends yet? I
run into various blends of PC+ABS all the time and have yet to find
anything that will work well. Methylene Chloride will melt the ABS part of
the blend, but it makes a brittle joint.
-Toth
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Why is it that there still has been just one patch released from Apple (that
one that fixed the QuickTime exploit) to address just one of the many Month
of Apple Bugs? These bugs need to be fixed and I really hope that Apple is
actively working on patches for all of the exploits related to Mac OS X that
the MOAB team found...is it because they're putting all their programmers
energy into 10.5? If that's true they really should take a few of the
programmers and assign them to making patches for these exploits...what's
the chances of these exploits being fixed in 10.5? c'mon Apple...get on it
already! :-(
Was going through all my HP paper tapes to inventory them and came across
the following mini-cart cartridge tapes (the kind you use in a 264x
terminal, DC100 I think). Unfortunately it is an obviously incomplete set,
but thought I'd list it here in case anyone is desperate for one of them.
They are all original HP labels.
RTE II + III + IV, MINI-CART (PE), #1 (C) rev 1840
RTE II ONLY, MINI-CART (PE), #2 (C) rev 1840
DG 1000 CRTG #1*, MINI-CART PE FMGR, 24998-13301 (C) REV 2326
DG 1000 CRTG #2, MINI-CART PE FMGR, 24998-13302 (C) REV 1926
DG 1000 CRTG #5, MINI-CART PE FMGR, 24998-13305 (C) REV 1822
Jay West
I've unearthed a Televideo 925 that I'd like to put into use. The only
problem seems to be a missing keycap. I forget which one at the moment.
Does anyone here have a broken 925 keyboard?
--
David Griffith
dgriffi at cs.csubak.edu
A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
I was wondering if we can estabish that you have to
use your real name here?
"Hex Star" stands out like a sore thumb. Everyone else
on this list uses their real name, not a "handle".
-------------Original Message:
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 22:54:36 +0000
From: Philip Pemberton <classiccmp at philpem.me.uk>
Subject: Re: WTD: Fuse PROM programming algorithms
M H Stein wrote:
> If you don't find 'em elsewhere, I've got Harris ('78), Intel ('76), Signetics ('78)
> and National ('77) databooks in front of me. Don't know about Intersil; was looking
> in the MMI book a while back, but now I can't remember where I put it down at the
> time (probably the same place as the cordless phone ;) .
Don't worry about the Intersil databook - Harris bought Intersil in the
mid-70s (IIRC), so an older Intersil databook would probably have the same (or
very similar) info to the Harris book.
I'd hazard a guess that most of the PROMs from a given manufacturer will use
the same algorithm, so all I really need are scans of the pages detailing that
manufacturer's algorithm and pinouts. The latter I already have in the form of
a file called 'promref.txt' from the old Wiretap arcade archive :)
Thanks.
--
-----------Reply:
Scans of the Harris, Signetics, NS & Intel data are on the way to you.
I think someone else on the list had the MMI data; if I find mine I'll let you know.
mike