At 11:17 PM 12/5/2005 -0600, you wrote:
> > I have the same problem. I've got a nice little homebrew 8MHz 6502-based
> > micro sitting next to me with an EPROM emulator hooked up. I've got EhBASIC
> > running on it, now I'm stuck in a "Now what? Write a DOS?" situation.
Anyone tried OS-65D, early disk operating system from Ohio Scientific?? Not
sure about the
hardware dependencies....
Regards, Terry King ...On The Mediterranean in Carthage, Tunisia
terry at terryking.us
Do you still have the 11/725 I need the tu58 boot tape. Please respond..
Thanks
John J Skowyra
Hewlett Packard
Manufacturing Engineering Support
Engineering Support Services
Phone: (603)-884-3397
Fax: (603)-884-3940
Cell: (603)-566-5694
Email: John.Skowyra at hp.com
Not sure if this was resolved.
I think the adventure on the diagpack2.rk05 was built for running off
a floppy. It will not run directly from the rk05 image. The one on this
image will run directly from it with
RUN RKB0:ADVENT
ftp://ftp.pdp8.net/images/os8/diag-games-kermit.rk05
It was built without EAE since my EAE wasn't working right at the time so
should work on any machine.
If you wish to put adventure on a different image/media follow these
instructions
http://www.pdp8.net/pdp8cgi/os8_html/ADVENT.DC?act=file;fn=images/os8/diag-…
Start from the EXECUTION step since the files needed for the earlier steps
no longer exist.
If you are moving between an emulator and a real PDP-8 make sure that
you disable things like EAE when building that you don't have on the
real PDP-8.
Here is a pinout for making a cable to connect an M8027 module to a standard
Centronics 36 pin connector. We have used this cable on many of our in-house
RT-11 systems and Epson-style printers.
In addition to being a DEC dealer, we are a hobbyist in the areas of RT-11,
OpenVMS, Oregon Software Pascal-2.
Thanks.
Mitch Miller
Keyways, Inc.
Centronics Compatible Cable for the DEC LPV11 Module
R. Miller 10-26-89
LPV11 Centronics Compatible
40 Pin Berg Connector 36 Pin Male Connector
--------------------- ---------------------
--------------------- ---------------------
1 1
--------------------- ---------------------
2 19
--------------------- ---------------------
3 6
--------------------- ---------------------
4 24
--------------------- ---------------------
5 7
--------------------- ---------------------
6 25
--------------------- ---------------------
7 - 8 No Connection --
--------------------- ---------------------
9 3
--------------------- ---------------------
10 21
--------------------- ---------------------
11 2
--------------------- ---------------------
12 20
--------------------- ---------------------
13 5
--------------------- ---------------------
14 23
--------------------- ---------------------
15 8
--------------------- ---------------------
16 26
--------------------- ---------------------
17 4
--------------------- ---------------------
18 22
--------------------- ---------------------
19 - 20 No Connection --
--------------------- ---------------------
21 10
--------------------- ---------------------
22 18
--------------------- ---------------------
23 \
> Tied Together --
24 /
--------------------- ---------------------
Centronics Compatible Cable for the DEC LPV11 Module
Continued
LPV11 Centronics Compatible
40 Pin Berg Connector 36 Pin Male Connector
--------------------- ---------------------
--------------------- ---------------------
25 11
--------------------- ---------------------
26 29
--------------------- ---------------------
27 - 36 No Connection --
--------------------- ---------------------
37 9
--------------------- ---------------------
38 27
--------------------- ---------------------
39 - 40 No Connection --
--------------------- ---------------------
NOTE:
Pin 1 of the 40 pin Berg Connector should be inserted into position
VV of the LPV11 connector.
Does anybody have a working Cromemco with 5.25" SSSD floppy drive[s]?
I finally made it out to pick up my Z-2D, and it came with a lot of
floppy diskettes. As it's going to be awhile before I bring up the Z-2D
to boot - it hasn't been powered up in many years, so I'll be cleaning
and then powering it up in stages - I thought I'd go ahead and image the
diskettes.
I've spot-checked a couple with 22Disk and they seem to have valid
data, so I'm going to try my hand at Dave Dunfield's ImageDisk. I'd
like for someone with a working system to try the images and see if
they're bootable.
Some of the diskette labels are totally incomprehensible to me, but
here's a list (almost all hand-labeled):
Cromemco CDOS SYSTEM DISK
Cromemco 16K BASIC
Cromemco Z-2D Test Disk 1 OF 2
CDOS 1.7 & Gen. Utils incl Copy5 [CopyS?]
CDOS & Utils vers. 1.7 incl drivers
(2.36 cdosgen this or other utils)
2.17 Utilities Backup
CDOS Ver 2.58 Boot
Z80 Assembler Deadsource Backup
Z80 Assembler Backup
Z80 Assembler
FORTRAN IV
FORTRAN IV Backup
FORTRAN Files
FORTRAN Disk (Steve)
Word Processor w/screen edit
Structured BASIC
16K BASIC Deadsource
Coblink & Rel Progs **
F) .COB Files (Disk 2) Backup
Appsadd Working Copy
OK TO BOOT HAS HARD DISK CDOS VER. 2.58
Dir Cop.dat
Mailing List Rev 07 w/CDOS 2.36
Payroll System Libraries
MICROEMACS Source
DS Boot Disk
Z-2D
Screen Editor for Soroc 120
VCALC, LCALC, Search
Subroutines Disk
Yes, it does have a Cromemco Hard Disk. I'll be looking to suck the
data off that soon, too, if it's alive.
Doc
> Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2005 02:14:13 -0800
> From: William Maddox <wmaddox at pacbell.net>
> Subject: Available: 8" Vydec compatible floppy disks
>
> I have a box of 10 Memorex "FD VI" Vydec-compatible
> 8" floppy disks. These are single-sided, double-density
> disks with hard-sectored index holes around the periphery
> of the disk (on the outside, not near the center hole).
> They are labelled as compatible with the Memorex 651 drive.
> Note that these are not the more common 32-sector format,
> or the even more common soft-sectored variety. As far as
> I know, these are useful only for Vydec word processors,
> a very early WYSIWYG WP system.
>
Early versions (PDP11/05, /10) of Monash University's MONECS used
Memorex 651 drives and the floppy disks should be compatible.
Regards,
Garry
Unfortunately, it seems that the end of IRIX is creeping closer- I was just poking around on the SGI website and it looks like they've dropped the big MIPS graphic systems (Onyxes) Linux is a fine system, but IRIX is very nice, too, and it's nice to have multiple sources of ideas to draw from (Indigo Magic is a pretty slick desktop, among other things SGI did.)
The big advantage of Linux over xBSD looks to be filesystems- Linux has JFS and XFS.
P.S.- I do know about 5dwm.org, and I look forward to seeing it.
>
>Subject: Re: Legacy apps in Windows/OS X was Re: Old MS-DOS & Win Software
> From: Scott Stevens <chenmel at earthlink.net>
> Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2005 21:05:45 -0500
> To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts" <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
>
>On Thu, 08 Dec 2005 00:27:31 +0000
>Adrian Graham <witchy at binarydinosaurs.co.uk> wrote:
>
>> On 7/12/05 23:53, "Zane H. Healy" <healyzh at aracnet.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Worst case, I setup something like my 8500/180 running an old
>> > enough version of the OS so that I can also run "Warlords 2".
>> > BTW, I do own PC versions of both games, from before I got a
>> > Mac, however, they're limited to 640x480, while the Mac
>> > versions go up to something like 1152x870. Both games are
>> > also well on topic, but still two of my favorite games of all
>> > time.
>>
>> My only take on this that springs to mind is why should you
>> expect a computer company to continue supporting older hardware
>> and software beyond a certain timeframe unless they explicitly
>> say their current product is 100% compatible with their 10/15/20
>> year old product? It's almost like expecting a car manufacturer
>> to still support manual wind-down windows and non-central
>> locking because you happen to like manual windows and door locks
>> you can activate individually.
>>
>
>It's not a matter of 'meeting the requirement' or else for the
>manufacturer. It's a matter of satisfying a customer and holding
>onto market share. I happen to prefer manual windows and
>non-central locking, and won't buy a car with electronic locks.
>That is my choice and car makers who want to sell a car to me will
>offer it.
>
>Much the same is true with Microsoft. They want to hold onto
>their legacy customers, in fact leveraging that legacy is a big
>part of how they've held onto and controlled the market. There
>come points at which it's probably to Microsoft's advantage to
>abandon legacy features, and that's when they do it. But they and
>a lot of the rest of us know that's really one of the only things
>they have going for themselves.
Therin lies the truth of the matter. It's why the VAX11/780 happend,
DGs machine Eclipse, and many others. The investment of software
and the desire for "customer retention" are often drivers of
technology choices. Its basic to even chipsets be they 8080 to 8088
then on to 80286 and Motorola did the same with 6800, 6809 and 68K.
Granted in many cases at the chip level they are not binary compatable
the idea being everyone gets to keep what they learned and has an
upgrade path. I don't think for one second that was missed in
business 101.
However, legacy can be an albatross, ones neck may be on the line
if the choice is wrong.
Allison
>
>Subject: Re: Legacy apps in Windows/OS X was Re: Old MS-DOS & Win Software
> From: "Chuck Guzis" <cclist at sydex.com>
> Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2005 18:32:54 -0800
> To: cctalk at classiccmp.org
>
>>> Consider on Windows XP that you can still run the following code:
>>>
>>> mov cl,9
>>> mov dx,offset HWMes
>>> call 5
>>> mov cl,0
>>> call 5
>>
>>Huh? Do you mean this?
>>
>>MOV AH, 9
>>MOV DX, HWMes
>>INT 21h
>>MOV AH, 0
>>INT 21h
>
>Nope, I mean what I said--try it. This little tidbit goes all the way back
>to the time before DOS 1.0, when some level of compatibility with CP/M
>applications was implemented. Notice that I didn't say "CP/M-86", which
>uses int 224 to make system calls (which will not work under MS-DOS or
>Windows of any flavor). I suspect this is an artifact of old SC-DOS/QDOS.
And it works on W98 too. I know for a fact that old DOS DBASEII used it
along with FCB support (another CP/Mism) with one caveat, the target drive
or partition have to be less tha 500mb! I know because I was running
a job costing system in DBASEII on a PIII running W98se and that was
the trick.
Allison