test-drb November 2005

test-drb@ccmp.vtda.org

255 participants
692 discussions

by cclist＠sydex.com

I've found an Ampex Megastore ISA card that interfaces via a 50-pin header. I've got the software for it, but no manuals, so I don't know what it's supposed to connect to--it doesn't seem to be SCSI. Any ideas? Cheers, Chuck

19 years, 1 month

help - 11/34 console problem -- CNTRL key behaviour

by ajp166＠bellatlantic.net

> >Subject: Re: help - 11/34 console problem -- CNTRL key behaviour > From: woodelf <bfranchuk at jetnet.ab.ca> > Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 10:22:23 -0700 > To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts <cctalk at classiccmp.org> > >> >> >Well if you are going to hack the 8008 you need the right tools. >Check here for a 8008 link I just found yesterday. > >> http://www.jkearney.com/8008/ > Haveing done two commercial designs with the part I have most of that including a copy of the MARK-8 article. Never like the part it was just on the cusp of 60 ICs for s system using it or 150 ICs or so to do it >from the ground up. Much prefered the 8080 and better yet 8085 and Z80s. Allison

19 years, 1 month

VCF 8.0 Pictures

by ajp166＠bellatlantic.net

> >Subject: RE: VCF 8.0 Pictures > From: "Hans Franke" <Hans.Franke at siemens.com> > Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 17:54:15 +0100 > To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts" <cctalk at classiccmp.org> > >> >Well, we usualy employ one official hootie for VCFe, although >> >I'm not shure for next year. > >> Well for one, I insist that you also have a supply of beefcake >> for us geeky girls. Fair is fair! ;) > >Beefkake? well, Leberk?s-sandwitches are available all >day at the VCFe food court, and of course we can add >some meatloaf for the traditional dinner if you want :) > >Gruss >H. Beefcake: young men with fine bodies. ;) The sandwitches are for eating while watching. ;-) Allison

19 years, 1 month

Ultrix for DECstations

by ajp166＠bellatlantic.net

> >Subject: Re: Ultrix for DECstations > From: Paul Koning <pkoning at equallogic.com> > Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 13:17:36 -0500 > To: cctalk at classiccmp.org > >>>>>> "Patrick" == Patrick Finnegan <pat at computer-refuge.org> writes: > > Patrick> No, those were "DEC 3000"s. DECstations (3000/5000/etc) > Patrick> were all MIPS. > > Patrick> And, from what I've heard, at least one reason that DEC made > Patrick> Alpha, and didn't port VMS to the MIPS architecture, is > Patrick> because they'd have to make a lot of changes to VMS, because > Patrick> of its security model, in order to make it work with MIPS. > Patrick> Aparently, MIPS just didn't work enough like a VAX CPU to > Patrick> easily port VMS to it. > >Maybe. But I wonder what could be missing that Alpha has and MIPS >doesn't that is so critical. An advantage over VAX. At that point in time it was considered but the forward planning people already had strong feeings that the VAX killer machine was to be next generation and generally that meant larger address (more than 32bits). >Supposedly, the only reason MIPS has supervisor mode is that DEC >insisted on having it added. I'd heard that. Never able to verify it. Allison

19 years, 1 month

VCF 8.0 Pictures

by john_boffemmyer_iv＠boff-net.dhs.org

And why is the brunette girl in the background making 'steering wheel - driving motions' that seems to make the much taller older gentleman next to her seem very concerned? Hehe. Please let it not be one of those 'hey, listen to this story about how I first came across classic computers... so after the car went over the curb into the store front...' Grin. -John Boffemmyer IV At 03:09 AM 11/10/2005, you wrote: >There is a second picture of the "hot geeky blond girl" which >promotes her to "hot geeky blond 'nice legs' girl" :-) >If I ever go to a VCF (in Germany), I must hire one of those >girls you see on the bonnet at car shows. It will not matter >what old stuff I exhibit, *my* stand will be visited most! :-) > >- Henk, PA8PDP. > >BTW. Thanks for sharing the pictures! Nice to see. > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: cctalk-bounces at classiccmp.org > > [mailto:cctalk-bounces at classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of John Boffemmyer IV > > Sent: donderdag 10 november 2005 2:16 > > To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts > > Subject: Re: VCF 8.0 Pictures > > > > Simply just biased because of the following: > > 1- hot geeky blonde girl (most would stop here) > > 2- Ghirardelli chocolates (in picture) > > 3- did I mention #1? > > 4- a very, very nice Apple Lisa =) > > -John Boffemmyer IV > > > > At 06:58 PM 11/9/2005, you wrote: > > > > >On 9/11/05 23:35, "Erik Klein" > > <classiccmp at vintage-computer.com> wrote: > > > > > > > I've just finished putting up a quick page for my VCF 8.0 > > > > pictures. > > > > There are no descriptions yet (any help would be > > > > appreciated - let > > > > me know if you recognize folks, items or whatnot) but > > > > I'll hopefully get to them soon. > > > > > >I know this is subjective and opinion based, but....wow..... > > > > > >http://www.vintage-computer.com/images/vcf8/elisabeth.jpg > > > > > >Not that it's my favourite machine or anything :) > > > > > >A > >This message and attachment(s) are intended solely for the use of >the addressee and may contain information that is privileged, >confidential or otherwise exempt from disclosure under applicable law. >If you are not the intended recipient or agent thereof responsible >for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are >hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of >this communication is strictly prohibited. >If you have received this communication in error, please notify the >sender immediately by telephone and with a "reply" message. >Thank you for your cooperation. -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.12.8/165 - Release Date: 11/9/2005

19 years, 1 month

Strange request.

by Mark.Brennan＠ie.fujitsu.com

Hi, My name is Mark Brennan, I am a systems engineer with Fujitsu in Ireland and I have a request I am looking for some help with. My request is some what strange to say the least. Since I joined Wang Computer in 1988 I have been collecting Product Brochures on various computer systems it started of with Wang Vs server systems. For the last few years I have been trying to collect old product/info/fact/marketing brochures on various computer systems with very little luck, as in the future I hope to set-up a web site with details and overviews of them. I have managed to collect some information on, DG/HP/Wang/Netframe/NCR/Tandem/DEC/Sequent/SGI/Siemens-Fujitsu/Pyramid/Apoll o/Cray/KSR/Ncube/ICL/Compaq etc, I was wondering whether or not you may have or know where I maybe able to get my hands on any old product brochures/fact sheets etc on any of the HP systems/servers, I know that my request is at best strange but any help would be great. Anything that is sent to me I will copy and return the originals it people still need them that is. Regard and thanks again markb. Mark Brennan System Engineer System Services FUJITSU Fujitsu House, South County Business Park, Leopardstown, Dublin 18, Ireland Tel: +353 (0) 1 2076900 Mobile: +353 (0) 87 2222326 Fax: +353 (0) 1 2161863 E-mail mark.brennan at ie.fujitsu.com Web: <http://ie.fujitsu.com/> http://ie.fujitsu.com/ Fujitsu Services Limited, Registered in England no 96056, Registered Office 26, Finsbury Square, London, EC2A 1SL This e-mail is only for the use of its intended recipient. Its contents are subject to a duty of confidence and may be privileged. Fujitsu Services does not guarantee that this e-mail has not been intercepted and amended or that it is virus-free.

19 years, 1 month

help - 11/34 console problem -- CNTRL key behaviour

by ajp166＠bellatlantic.net

> >Subject: RE: help - 11/34 console problem -- CNTRL key behaviour > From: "Gooijen, Henk" <henk.gooijen at oce.com> > Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 09:03:40 +0100 > To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts" <cctalk at classiccmp.org> > >Tony wrote: > >> > just a short question, I have seen so much that I start doubting >> > everything :-( After you pressed the CLR key on the 11/34 >> > console (to get a clear start point), if you *only* press the >> > CNTRL key, nothing should happen, right? >> >> Right. The CNTRL key is a bit like a shift key, and should do >> nothing on its own. >> >> >> To answere one of your other posts, I would expect data to be >> written ot the display latch quite frequently (of the order of ms) >> _but_ the write pulse will be narrow (a few us at most), and if >> you've got the analyser set up to sample for long enough to display >> several display scans, you might well miss some of the write pulses >> because they occur between analyser samples. I think the K100D has >> 'gltich capture' for just this sort of problem, try selecting it for >> the input you use for the write pulse. >> >> -tony > >Ok, so the CNTRL key behaviour analysis is a good point to start with. > >Yesterday evening I checked the latch that gives the NUM 1-2-3 >signals, and the buffer that is behind it. The in- and output signals >are OK, although it is *constantly* '110', which matches the display >value "666666". On the LA (set to sample at 1 msec) I did see *one* >pulse on the CLK pin of the latch. My guess yesterday evening was, >that is not correct as just *one* pulse in 1000 msec is way to low >for a good refresh rate, just as you say Tony. It did not occur to me >that the single pulse was "by luck" detected by the LA. If the LA sees >*one*, I should see more, I'd guess. I do remember that I had to turn >up the brightness control of the scope to see the thin CLK pulses ... >I will put a picture on the webpage tomorrow. >The battery of the camera is recharging. > >Your initial remark about a failing RAM chip is still in the picture, >as the value to display is taken from the first 3 locations of the >RAM. BTW, the operator/maintenance manual has an error in the memory >allocation. It shows that the first byte is for the display, but it >is actually the first 3 bytes. So the rest of the picture can not be >correct either ... The assembler source listing proves this. Every >time a digit must be set on the output port, the 3 memory locations >are shifted 3 bits. That means with 6 digits, that at the end the >total shifted bit count is 18. The code corrects the value in the >3 memory locations by shifting 6 bit positions when the complete >6 digit number is sent to the output port. > >I am getting tempted to install the totally dead M7859, and have a >look at it, with the new knowledge build up from this module. May be >its is just a defective 8008, but I am afraid that if I get the dead >M7859 working, this weird defective one will end up on the pile of >things "I must do, when I get the time" ... >But I will first inspect the two RAM chips! 4-bit data in, 4-bit data >out, 4 address bits, one select pin and one clock pin (the WE* pin >is tied to GND). Should be possible to see it all with the 16 channels >and make a conclusion of the RAM's condition. You might have been >correct from the beginning, Tony! Never seen a dead 8008. I thought I'd killed one (at $180 then!) by installing it backward and then tossed it on the floor in the engineering lab. some days later after pulling from the bottom of my shoe I tried it again and it was still alive. The ram however is definately suspect. But I've seen IO messups with 8008 and with scanned displays and keyboards are harder to look at. It would be goof if you could run a different program and see it's results. We used a set of ROMs all different to test. They were short programs that would either loop or do something and halt. For example we had one that would write (this was a time display) 00:00:00 then increment all the displays without doing anything else. Another would write a 8 tot he last display and halt. the most useful ones were those that would repeatedly loop input or output to a port. Very handy as back (1973) then logic analysers were not to be had and a 15mhz dual trace scope was the usual tool. Allison

19 years, 1 month

MSCP SCSI controller speed

by ajp166＠bellatlantic.net

> >Subject: Re: MSCP SCSI controller speed > From: 9000 VAX <vax9000 at gmail.com> > Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 00:23:01 -0500 > To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts" <cctalk at classiccmp.org> > >You are right. Those two are not the bottleneck. I measured the actual >execution time when run "dd if=syssrc.tar of=/dev/null" (photo >attached). NetBSD 1.5.2 moves 16kB a time. The measured time is: > >4.75ms MSCP-pre-DMA overhead >0.4ms SCSI overhead >7ms DMA of 16kB >4.2ms MSCP-post-DMA overhead >31ms idle time > >What kills the speed is the 31ms idle time. I blame NetBSD for that. You need a real time or single user os to get better results. Plain old dos might do far better or maybe a custom kernal tuned for this use. >> nor wished to program PCs. That and someone gave me a CMD SCSI adaptor. ;) >> > >You are lucky. Nobody gives me CMD card. But from now on I probably >will not need one any more. It was a lot of years ago, pre epay inflation. That and I got a broken BA123 microvax with it. Allison

19 years, 1 month

VCF 8.0 Pictures

by henk.gooijen＠oce.com

> Am 10 Nov 2005 9:09 meinte Gooijen, Henk: > > > There is a second picture of the "hot geeky blond girl" > > which promotes her to "hot geeky blond 'nice legs' girl" :-) > > If I ever go to a VCF (in Germany), I must hire one of those > > girls you see on the bonnet at car shows. It will not matter > > what old stuff I exhibit, *my* stand will be visited most! :-) > > I have to see that ... your booth at VCFe 6.0 is reserved :) > > Gruss > H. > -- > VCF Europa 7.0 am 29/30.April und 01.Mai 2006 in Muenchen > http://www.vcfe.org/ Yes, I am giving it serious thoughts! Do you provide the girlz, Hans? Would be an BIG incentive! :-) On display I can have: 1) SIMH connected to homebrew PDP-11/40 console running RT11 2) Homebrew pdp8/e running (slow) OS/8 or DMS 3) PDP-11/03, a real one for a change :-) decoding HAM radio RTTY 4) SIMH connected to a *real* PDP-11/70 console but items 3 and 4 are "under development" ... - Henk, PA8PDP. This message and attachment(s) are intended solely for the use of the addressee and may contain information that is privileged, confidential or otherwise exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient or agent thereof responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by telephone and with a "reply" message. Thank you for your cooperation.

19 years, 1 month

VCF 8.0 Pictures

by henk.gooijen＠oce.com

There is a second picture of the "hot geeky blond girl" which promotes her to "hot geeky blond 'nice legs' girl" :-) If I ever go to a VCF (in Germany), I must hire one of those girls you see on the bonnet at car shows. It will not matter what old stuff I exhibit, *my* stand will be visited most! :-) - Henk, PA8PDP. BTW. Thanks for sharing the pictures! Nice to see. > -----Original Message----- > From: cctalk-bounces at classiccmp.org > [mailto:cctalk-bounces at classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of John Boffemmyer IV > Sent: donderdag 10 november 2005 2:16 > To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts > Subject: Re: VCF 8.0 Pictures > > Simply just biased because of the following: > 1- hot geeky blonde girl (most would stop here) > 2- Ghirardelli chocolates (in picture) > 3- did I mention #1? > 4- a very, very nice Apple Lisa =) > -John Boffemmyer IV > > At 06:58 PM 11/9/2005, you wrote: > > >On 9/11/05 23:35, "Erik Klein" > <classiccmp at vintage-computer.com> wrote: > > > > > I've just finished putting up a quick page for my VCF 8.0 > > > pictures. > > > There are no descriptions yet (any help would be > > > appreciated - let > > > me know if you recognize folks, items or whatnot) but > > > I'll hopefully get to them soon. > > > >I know this is subjective and opinion based, but....wow..... > > > >http://www.vintage-computer.com/images/vcf8/elisabeth.jpg > > > >Not that it's my favourite machine or anything :) > > > >A This message and attachment(s) are intended solely for the use of the addressee and may contain information that is privileged, confidential or otherwise exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient or agent thereof responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by telephone and with a "reply" message. Thank you for your cooperation.

19 years, 1 month

← Newer
1
...
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
...
70
Older →

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

test-drb November 2005