The FPGA/Xilinx swearing around here reminds me...
Many years ago (OK, decades, actually a good chunk of a
century now) the tools for doing embedded software development from
the manufacturers were:
1. Distributed as source code
2. Widely portable
3. Well-documented in terms of file formats
Examples are the Intel 8008 PL/M compiler they released in Fortran
and the original PALASM (Monolithic Memories?) in Fortran.
(IIRC the PALASM source appeared in printed form in one of
the manuals).
Even for commercial tools, the three "good things" enumerated
above were often true. The reason for this
openness was because user's didn't all
have identical development platforms, often they had access
to a timesharing system or a departmental minicomputer that
they used for cross-compilation etc.
Since then of course the tools have become MSDOS/Windows-only,
distributed only as binaries, and sometimes the file formats/
programming process are trade secrets (often reverse-engineered
by those using them!) I can see why this happened: supposedly
everybody had a PC-clone running Microsoft software, so you
could just give away or sell binaries instead of source code.
Of course, freeware embedded tools (e.g. GNU and others) today reflect
a backlash against the Windows-ization of embedded development
tools.
A similar thing has happened to SPICE (most users are not
using the open-source Berkeley code but instead proprietary
versions which lock them in to a specific vendor and that vendor's
component models). And there's
the backlash to this in the open-source community (SPICE3
with ngspice/gEDA and some GUI's layered on top of it.)
But in my experience, outside the hobbyist community the
freeware embedded tools don't have much traction. I'd be glad to
be proven wrong! Actually I do know of a couple of
small commercial projects that used gcc for StrongARM and
have heard of a couple that use gcc for MSP430.
I myself use gputils (GNU PIC utilities) and gpsim occasionally
and am occasionally forced to plunge into hell with commercial
embedded development tools (which mostly suck) under
Windows.
OK, that's my pontification for this morning.
Tim.
Are there any Econet enthusiasts here?
I've just bought most of an Acorn Econet fileserver (it's missing the 2
floppy drioves and their cables, the mainboard and PSU look intact).
The mainboard contains :
65C102 CPU
64K EPROM (2 off 27256). I've not tried to look at their contents yet
64K DRAM
WD2793 disk controller (not what I'd expect from Acorn)
6522 VIA
Real time clcok chip and backup battery
TTL glue
An Econet module (looks like the one used in a Master or Arc, the type
with the hardware collision detection). Oddly theres a 26LS30 on the
mainboard, does this thing source the Exonet clock too?
The PSU looks to be a normal switch-mode unit giving +5V and +12V
On the back are the 5 pin DIN econet socket, a 26 pin header identified
as 'Printer' (presumably wired as a BBC micro printer port) and a 34 pin
header. I am told this is to add a hard disk, and it looks similar to a
Beeb's 1MHz bus. I assume it takes the normal SASI host adapter and ST506
bridgboard (I have spares of those somewhere...)
On the front are 2 LEDs (power and mode) and what looks like a
reflectiove optoswitch (why?)
Can anyone tell me anything more about it, how to use it, what the
intenral links do, etc?
-tony
>From: "steve" <gkicomputers at yahoo.com>
>
>
>>
>> What's odd is that th 4004's are going for very
>> little, even though they're
>> an "older' MPU.
>>
>not sure where your looking, but on ebay they don't,
>the C4004's go for hundreds, the C8008's for $20-$50
>(about the same as the D4004)
>
Hi
I often time wonder what a working sim4-01 setup
would go for. Not that I'd sell mine but I've been
thinking of a donation to the CHM. If I knew the value
I might get a tax write off.
I've never seen one come up on ebay and only know
of a couple others. I'd be interested to know if others
on the list might have one?
Dwight
>From: "Chuck Guzis" <cclist at sydex.com>
>
>Did National ever make a version of the NSC800 that ran faster than 4 MHz?
>If so, where can I get one?
>
>Cheers,
>Chuck
>
Hi
I'm not sure if it was faster but they did put is in a small
module with Forth on ROM and some I/O. I think they called
the series RA2000 or something like that. I have a couple
of these modules someplace.
Dwight
> Does anyone here have suggestions on what I should use for a
> terminal server? If I could just mount a DECserver box in my
> PDP-11 chassis that would be great, but isn't the Ethernet
> port DECnet-only?
Livingston Portmasters can be had cheap on epay.
IBM 3196 terminal, preferably color, similarly #'ed
models might be...similar, not sure. Might consider
one of *those*
IBM DisplayWriter
IBM 5520
IBM 5120
IBM System 23/Datamaster
IBM RT stuph
Mindset computer, Canon AS-100, Atari PC2, Victor
9000, Zenith Z-100/120, Atari ST series units and
parts, maybe an Atari 130XE. Kind of have a hankering
for an Amiga 2000 or later *box*.
Located in NJ, or PA, or LI, depends on the day of the
week. Could possibly trade some groovy stuph. Pickups
possible.
__________________________________
Yahoo! FareChase: Search multiple travel sites in one click.
http://farechase.yahoo.com
I have a 100u that I plan eventually to revive, too. I also have
a few spare boards that I want to hang on to, but I think there's one
or two 2/120 CPUs among them that I could part with. Contact me
off line if you're interested.
Geoff.
ghrx.at.solivant.com
>So if anyone out there has a spare, or a board that
>needs repair, etc. Let me know! Any 68010 multibus
>Sun card would do.
>